Element contents
Children's Voices and Agency
Ways of Listening in Early Childhood Quantitative, Qualitative and Mixed Methods Research
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 September 2024
Summary
The increased international legislation emphasising children's participation agenda heightened the need for high-quality research in early childhood. Listening to young children asserts their participation, agency and voices in research, an approach commonly associated with qualitative research methods. This Element provides a novel perspective to listening to children's voices by focusing on research methods in early childhood studies that are broadly categorised as quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods. Locating these research methods from a children's rights perspective, this Element is based on values that young children have the right to be involved in research irrespective of culture and context. Each section discusses how the different methodologies and approaches used in early childhood research align with the principles of children's participation and agency, as well as their right to express their views on matters that affect them. The Element concludes with a roadmap for future early childhood research and its ethical dissemination.
Keywords
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Online ISBN: 9781009285407Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 17 October 2024
References
Aubrey, C., & Dahl, S. (2005). That child needs a good listening to! Reviewing effective interview strategies. Journal of Education, 35, 99–119. https://doi.org/10.10520/AJA0259479X_108Google Scholar
Barata, M. C., & Yoshikawa, H. (2014). Mixed methods in research on child well-being. In Ben-Arieh, A., Casas, F., Frønes, I., & Korbin, J. (Eds.). Handbook of child well-being (pp. 2879–2893). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9063-8_114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barratt Hacking, E., Cutter-Mackenzie, A., & Barratt, R. (2013). Children as active researchers. The potential of environmental education research involving children. In Stevenson, R. B., Brody, M., Dillon, J., & Wals, A. E. J. (Eds.). International handbook of research on environmental education (pp. 438–458). Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benjamin, T. E., Lucas-Thompson, R. G., Little, L. M., Davies, P. L., & Khetani, M. A. (2017). Participation in early childhood educational environments for young children with and without developmental disabilities and delays: A mixed methods study. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatircs, 37(1), 87–107. https://doi.org/10.3109/01942638.2015.1130007CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
BERA. (2018). Ethical guidelines for educational research (4th ed.). British Educational Research Association (BERA). www.bera.ac.uk/publication/ethical-guidelines-for-educational-research-2018-onlineGoogle Scholar
Bergold, J., & Thomas, S. (2012). Participatory research methods: A methodological approach in motion. [110 paragraphs]. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 13(1), Art. 30. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs1201304Google Scholar
Bertam, T., Formosinho, J., Gray, C., Pascal, C., & Whalley, M. (2015). EECERA Ethical Code for Early Childhood Researchers. European Early Childhood Education Research Association (EECERA). www.eecera.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/EECERA-Ethical-Code.pdfGoogle Scholar
Bishop, K. (2014). Challenging research: Completing participatory social research with children and adolescents in a hospital setting. HERD: Heard Environments Research & Design Journal, 7(2), 76–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/193758671400700205CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blaisdell, C., McNair, L. J., Addison, L., & Davis, J. M. (2022). ‘Why am I in all of these pictures?’ From learning stories to lived stories: The politics of children’s participation rights in documentation practices. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 30(4), 572–585. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2021.2007970CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradbury-Jones, C., Isham, L., & Taylor, J. (2018). The complexities and contradictions in participatory research with vulnerable children and young people: A qualitative systematic review. Social Science & Medicine, 215, 80–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.08.038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryman, A., & Bell, E. (2019). Social research methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cillessen, A. H. N., & Marks, P. E. L. (2017). Methodological choices in peer nomination research. New Directions in Peer Nomination Methodology: New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 157, 21–44. https://doi-org.ejournals.um.edu.mt/10.1002/cad.20206Google Scholar
Clark, A. (2005). Ways of seeing: Using the Mosaic approach to listen to young children’s perspectives. In Clark, A., Kjørholt, A. T., & Moss, P. (Eds.). Beyond listening: Children’s perspectives on early childhood services (pp. 29–49). The Policy Press.Google Scholar
Clark, A. (2010). Young children as protagonists and the role of participatory, visual methods in engaging multiple perspectives. American Journal of Community Psychology, 46(1–2), 115–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-010-9332-yCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, A., & Moss, P. (2011). Listening to young children: The Mosaic approach. National Children’s Bureau.Google Scholar
Clarke, V., Braun, V., Frith, H., & Moller, N. (2019). Editorial introduction to the special issue: Using story completion methods in qualitative research. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 16(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2018.1536378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in Education. Routledge.Google ScholarPubMed
Corr, C., Snodgrass, M. R., Greene, J. C., Meadan, H., & Santos, R. M. (2020). Mixed methods in early childhood special education research: Purposes, challenges, and guidance. Journal of Early Intervention, 42(1), 20–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053815119873096CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coyne, I., Mallon, D., & Chubb, E. (2021). Researching with young children: Exploring the methodological advantages and challenges of using hand puppets and draw and tell. Children & Society, 35(5), 813–830. https://doi.org/10.1111/chso.12452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage.Google Scholar
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage.Google Scholar
Dahlberg, G., Moss, P., & Pence, A. (2013). Beyond quality in early childhood education and care: Languages of evaluation. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daly, A. (2020). Assessing children’s capacity: Reconceptualising our understanding through the UN convention on the rights of the child. The International Journal of Children’s Rights, 28(3), 471–499. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718182-02803011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daly, A. (2022). Climate competence: Youth climate activism and its impact on international human rights law. Human Rights Law Review, 22(2), ngac011. https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngac011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danby, S., & Farrell, A. (2004). Accounting for young children’s competence in education research: New perspectives on research ethics. Australian Educational Research, 31(3), 35–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03249527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawadi, S., Shrestha, S., & Giri, R. A. (2021). Mixed-methods research: A discussion on its types, challenges, and criticisms. Journal of Practical Studies in Education, 2(2), 25–36. https://doi.org/10.46809/jpse.v2i2.20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeLay, D., Laursen, B., Kiuru, N., et al. (2021). A comparison of dyadic and social network assessments of peer influence. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 45(3), 275–288. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025421992866CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2014). Internet, phone, mail and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method (4th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dockett, S., Einarsdottir, J., & Perry, B. (2009). Researching with children: Ethical tensions. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 7(3), 283–298. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476718X09336971CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dockett, S., Einarsdottir, J., & Perry, B. (2017). Photo elicitation: Reflecting on multiple sites of meaning. International Journal of Early Years Education, 25(3), 225–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760.2017.1329713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dockett, S., Main, S., & Kelly, L. (2011). Consulting young children: Experiences from a museum. Visitor Studies, 14(1), 13–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/10645578.2011.557626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doyle, J., Edwards, D., & Haddow, A. (2022). Applying mixed methods research in large-scale programs: Tracing the long-term outcomes of development scholarship alumni. Journal of Studies in International Education, 28(1), 87–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/10283153221126246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebrahim, H., & Francis, D. (2008). You said, ‘Black girl’: Doing difference in early childhood. Africa Education Review, 5(2), 274–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/18146620802449894CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, C., Gandini, L., & Forman, G. (2011). The hundred languages of children: The Reggio Emilia experience in transformation. Praeger.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, S. (2021). Process quality, curriculum and pedagogy in early childhood education and care. OECD education working papers No. 247. OECD. www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/eba0711e-en.pdf?expires=1670225864&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=884B21A68603557818C458EBC3F4124AGoogle Scholar
Ellingson, L. L., & Sotirin, P. (2020). Making data in qualitative research: Engagements, ethics, and entanglements. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elwick, S. (2015). ‘Baby-cam’ and researching with infants: Viewer, image and (not)knowing. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 16(4), 322–338. https://doi.org/10.1177/146394911561632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Commission. (2021). Early childhood education and care and the Covid-19 pandemic: Understanding and managing the impact of the crisis on the sector. European Commission. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2766/60724Google Scholar
European Union. (2016). Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation). European Union. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/ojGoogle Scholar
Fàbregues, S., Escalante-Barrios, E. L., Molina-Azorin, J. F., Hong, Q. N., & Verd, J. M. (2021). Taking a critical stance towards mixed methods research: A cross-disciplinary qualitative secondary analysis of researchers’ views. Plos One, 16(7), e0252014. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252014CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fanghorban, R., Roudsari, R. L., & Taghipour, A. (2014). Skype interviewing: The new generation of online synchronous interview in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being, 9, 24152. http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/qhw.v9.24152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
File, N., Mueller, J. J., Wisneski, D. B., & Stremmel, A. J. (2017). Understanding research in early childhood education: Quantitative and qualitative methods. Routledge.Google Scholar
Fleer, M., & van Oers, B. (Eds.). (2018). International handbook of early childhood education, Vol. 1. Springer Nature.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleet, A., & Harcourt, D. (2018). (Co)-researching with children. In Fleer, M., & van Oers, B. (Eds.). International handbook of early childhood education, Vol. 1 (pp. 165–201). Springer Nature.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flewitt, R. S. (2022). Ethical provocations for early childhood research. In Kumpulainen, K., Kajamaa, A., Erstad, O., et al. (Eds.). Nordic childhoods in the digital age: Insights into contemporary research on communication, learning and education (pp. 207–213). Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flewitt, R., & Ang, L. (2020). Research methods for early childhood education. Bloomsbury Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, M. (2009). Ethics. In Tisdall, E. K. M., Davis, J., & Gallegher, M. (Eds.). Researching with children and young people: Research design, methods and analysis (pp. 11–28). Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerholm, T., Kallioinen, P., Toner, S., et al. (2019). A randomized controlled trial to examine the effect of two teaching methods on preschool children’s language and communication, executive functions, socioemotional comprehension, and early math skills. BMC Psychology, 7(59), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-019-0325-9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilliat-Ray, S., Jacobs, S., Gregg, S. E., et al. (2022). Research ethics. In Engler, S., & Stausberg, M. (Eds.). The Routledge handbook of research methods in the study of religion (pp. 88–109). Routledge.Google Scholar
Gold, Z. S., Perlman, J., Howe, N., et al. (2022). An observational study of children’s problem solving during play with friends. Journal of Cognition and Development, 24(4), 503–523. https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2022.2058509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gooding, P. (2021) The library in digital humanities: Interdisciplinary approaches to digital materials. In Schuster, K., & Stuart, D. (Eds.). Routledge international handbook of research methods in digital humanities (pp. 137–152). Routledge Handbooks Online.Google Scholar
Gopalan, M., Rosinger, K., & Bin Ahn, J. (2020). Using quasi-experimental research design in education research: Growth, promise, and challenges. Review of Research in Education, 44, 218–243. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X20903302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greig, A., Taylor, J., & MacKay, T. (2013). Doing research with children: A practical guide. Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2018). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 173–202). Sage.Google Scholar
Guimond, F. A., Altman, R., Vitaro, F., Brendgen, M., & Laursen, B. (2022). The interchangeability of liking and friend nominations to measure peer acceptance and friendship. International Journal of Behaviour Development, 46(4), 358–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/01650254221084097Google ScholarPubMed
Hansen Sandseter, E. B., Stroli, R., & Sando, O. J. (2022). The dynamic relationship between outdoor environments and children’s play. Education 3–13, 50(1), 97–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2020.1833063Google Scholar
Harrison, L. J., & Wang, C. (2018). Current approaches in quantitative research in early childhood education. In Fleer, M., & van Oers, B. (Eds.). International handbook of early childhood education, Vol. 1 (pp. 295–316). Springer Nature.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, R. A. (1992). Children’s participation: From tokenism to citizenship. UNICEF. www.unicef-irc.org/publications/pdf/childrens_participation.pdfGoogle Scholar
Hirosawa, E., & Oga-Baldwin, W. L. O. (2023). Surveys and questionnaires with young language learners. In Butler, Y. G., & Haung, B. H. (Eds.). Research methods for understanding child second language development. Routledge.Google Scholar
Hoyte, F., Degotardi, S., & Torr, J. (2015). What it is all about: Topic choices in young children’s play. International Journal of Play, 4(2), 136–148. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21594937.2015.1060566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, A., & Prout, A. (2015). Constructing and reconstructing childhood: Contemporary issues in the sociological study of childhood. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, V., Colwell, J., & Hart, R. (2014). Steps to engaging young children in research. Volume 2: The researcher toolkit. Education Research Centre, University of Brighton. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.22139.82720Google Scholar
Kähler, J., Hahn, I., & Köller, O. (2020). The development of early scientific literacy gaps in kindergarten children. International Journal of Science Education, 42(12), 1988–2007. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1808908CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koller, D., & Murphy, E. (2022). Dolls as a rights-affirming early childhood research method. The International Journal of Children’s Rights, 30(4), 922–956. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718182-30040005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lahman, M. K. E. (2018). Ethics in social science research: Becoming culturally responsive. Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laursen, B. (2015). I don’t quite get it … Personal experiences within the person-oriented approach. Journal of Person-Oriented Research, 1(1-2), 42-47. https://doi.org/10.17505/jpor.2015.05CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laursen, B., Legget-James, M. P., & Valdes, O. M. (2023). Relative likeability and relative popularity as sources of influence in children’s friendships. PLoS ONE, 18(5), e0283117. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283117CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lazar, I., Darlington, R., Murray, H., et al. (1982). Lasting effects of early education: A report from the consortium for longitudinal studies. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 47(2/3), i, iii, v–vii, ix–xiv, 1–151. https://doi.org/10.2307/1165938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeMasters, A. C., & Vandermaas-Peeler, M. (2023). Exploring outdoor play: A mixed-methods study of the quality of preschool play environments and teacher perceptions of risky play. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor, 23(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2021.1925564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenette, C., Vaughan, P., & Boydell, K. (2022). How can story completion be used in culturally safe ways? International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 21(ahead of print). https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069221077764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liebenberg, L., & Ungar, U. (2015). Using mixed methods in research with young children across cultures and contexts. In Saracho, O. N. (Ed.). Handbook of research methods in early childhood education: Review of research methodologies, Vol. 1 (pp. 383–402). Information Age.Google Scholar
Loebach, J., & Cox, A. (2022). Playing in ‘the backyard’: Environmental features and conditions of a natural playspace which support diverse outdoor play activities among younger children. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(10), 12661. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912661CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luken, M. M., & Sauzet, O. (2021). Patterning strategies in early childhood: A mixed methods study examining 3- to 5-year-old children’s patterning competencies. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 23(1), 28–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2020.1719452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lundy, L. (2007). ‘Voice’ is not enough: Conceptualising article 12 of the United Nations convention on the rights of the child. British Educational Research Journal, 33(6), 927–942. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920701657033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacDonald, C. (2009). The importance of identity and policy: The case for and of children. Children and Society, 23(4), 241–251. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-0860.2008.00170.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacNaughton, G., Hughes, P., & Smith, K. (2008). Young children as active citizens: Principles, policies and pedagogies. Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Marks, P. E. L. (2017). Introduction to the special issue: 20th-Century origins and 21st-Century developments of peer nomination methodology. New Directions in Peer Nomination Methodology: New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 157, 7–19. https://doi-org.ejournals.um.edu.mt/10.1002/cad.20205Google Scholar
Mehari, K. R., Waasdrop, T. E., & Leff, S. S. (2019). Measuring relational and overt aggression by peer report: A comparison of peer nominations and peer ratings. Journal of School Violence, 18(3), 362–374. https://doi-org.ejournals.um.edu.mt/10.1080/15388220.2018.1504684CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Melhuish, E., Belsky, J., Leyland, A. H., Barnes, J., & The National Evaluation of Sure Start Research Team. (2008). Effects of fully-established Sure Start Local Programmes on 3-year-old children and their families living in England: A quasi-experimental observational study. The Lancet, 372, 1641–1647. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61667-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mertens, D. M. (2015). Evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods. Sage.Google Scholar
Messinger, D. S., Prince, E. B., Zheng, M., et al. (2019). Continuous measurement of dynamic classroom social interactions. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 43(3), 263–270. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025418820708CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, V. A., & Nelson, R. M. (2006). A developmental approach to child assent for nontherapeutic research. The Journal of Pediatrics, 149(1), s25–s30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2006.04.047CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moller, N. P., Clarke, V., Braun, V., Tischner, I., & Vossler, A. (2021). Qualitative story completion for counseling psychology research: A creative method to interrogate dominant discourses. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 68(3), 286–298. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000538CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morrow, V. (2008). Dilemmas in children’s participation in England. In Invernizzi, A., & Williams, J. (Eds.). Children and citizenship (pp. 120–130). Sage.Google Scholar
Mukherji, P., & Albon, D. (2018). Research methods in early childhood: An introductory guide. Sage.Google Scholar
Nguyen, K. T. N. H., Stuart, J. J., Shah, A. H., et al. (2023). Novel methods for leveraging large cohort studies for qualitative and mixed methods research. American Journal of Epidemiology, 192(5), 821–829. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwad030CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nur, I., & Arnas, Y. A. (2022). Turkish preschool children’s representations of friendship: Story completion method adaptation study. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 9(2), 357–375. https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.958145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OECD. (2018). Engaging young children: Lessons from research about quality in early childhood education and care, starting strong. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264085145-enGoogle Scholar
OECD. (2022a). Early childhood education and care workforce development: A foundation process quality. OECD. www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/e012efc0-en.pdf?expires=1670225921&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=9B6F69E3A5FD5064F94FEEE4D3491FC9Google Scholar
OECD. (2022b). Education at a glance 2022: OECD indicators. OECD. www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/education-at-a-glance-2022_3197152b-enGoogle Scholar
O’Farrelly, C., & Tatlow-Golden, M. (2022). It is up to you if you want to take part. Supporting young children’s informed choice about research participation with simple visual booklets. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 30(1), 63–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2022.2026434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearce, L. (2012). Mixed methods inquiry in sociology. American Behavioral Scientist, 56(6), 829–848. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764211433798CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, L. K., Mitsven, S. G., Custode, S., et al. (2022). Reciprocal patterns of peer speech in preschoolers with and without hearing loss. Early Childhood Quarterly, 60, 201–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2022.02.003CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. International Universities Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plano Clark, V. L., & Ivankova, N. V. (2016). Mixed methods research: A guide to the field. Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plucker, J. A., & Makel, M. C. (2021). Replication is important for educational psychology: Recent developments and key issues. Educational Psychologist, 56(2), 90–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2021.1895796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prout, A. (2005). The future of childhood: Towards the interdisciplinary study of children. Routledge Falmer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prout, A. (2011). Taking a step away from modernity: Reconsidering the new sociology of childhood. Global Studies Childhood, 1(1), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.2304/gsch.2011.1.1.4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prout, A., & James, A. (1997). A new paradigm for the sociology of childhood? In James, A., & Prout, A. (Eds.). Constructing and reconstructing childhood: Contemporary issues in the sociological study of childhood (2nd ed., pp. 7–33). Routledge.Google Scholar
Punch, S. (2002). Research with children: The same or different from research with adults? Childhood, 9(3), 321–341. https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568202009003005Google Scholar
Qvortrup, J. (2006). Editorial: Are children subjects or a liability? Childhood, 13(4), 435–439. https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568206068555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rinaldi, C. (2021). In dialogue with Reggio Emilia: Listening, researching and learning (2nd ed.). Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roni, S. M., Merga, M. K., & Morris, J. E. (2020). Conducting quantitative research in education. Springer Nature Singapore.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roth-Cline, M., & Nelson, R. M. (2013). Parental permission and child assent in research on children. Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine, 86(3), 291–301. PMID: 24058304, PMCID: PMC3767214Google ScholarPubMed
Sammons, P., Siraj-Blatchford, I., Sylva, K., et al. (2005). Investigating the effect of pre-school provision: Using mixed methods in the EPPE research. International Journal of Social Research and Methodology, 8(5), 207–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570500154840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartzman, H. B. (1976). The anthropological study of children’s play. Annual Review of Anthropology, 5, 289–328. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.05.100176.001445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, D., & Usher, R. (2011). Researching education: Data methods and theory in educational enquiry. Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Sheridan, M. D. (2008). From birth to five years: Children’s developmental progress. Routledge.Google Scholar
Shier, H. (2001). Pathways to participation: Openings, opportunities and obligations. Children and Society, 15, 107–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/chi.617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siagian, C., Habib, M., Bennouna, C., et al. (2021). Handbook for children’s participation in research in Indonesia. PUSKAPA.Google Scholar
Sivertsen, A. H., & Moe, B. (2022). Four-to-six-year-old children’s experiences of participating in different physical environments and activities in early childhood education and care institutions in Norway. Education 3–13, 50(7), 857–867. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2021.1914703Google Scholar
Slot, P. (2018). Structural characteristics and processes of quality early childhood education and care: A literature review. OECD working papers No. 176. OECD. www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/edaf3793-en.pdf?expires=1670225846&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=923119C26ADA60D23A691BEDE1158BC7Google Scholar
Spiteri, J. (2016). Young children’s perceptions of environmental sustainability: A Maltese perspective. Unpublished PhD thesis. Edinburgh: The University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Spiteri, J. (2020). A reflection on research methods that engage young children with environmental sustainability. An Leanbh Og, 13(1), 149–170. https://omepireland.ie/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/AN-LEANBH-OG-VOL13.pdfGoogle Scholar
Stenger, K. M., Ritter-Gooder, P. K., Perry, C., & Albercht, J. A. (2014). A mixed methods study of food safety knowledge, practices and beliefs in Hispanic families with young children. Appetite, 83, 194–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2014.08.034CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stephenson, A. (2009). Horses in the sandpit: Photography, prolonged involvement and ‘stepping back’ as strategies for listening to children’s voices. Early Child Development and Care, 179(2), 13–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430802667047CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stroli, R., & Hansen Sandseter, E. B. (2019). Children’s play, well-being and involvement: How children play indoors and outdoors in Norwegian early childhood education and care institutions. International Journal of Play, 8(1), 65–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/21594937.2019.1580338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun, Y., Blewitt, C., Edwards, S., et al. (2023). Methods and ethics in qualitative research exploring young children’s voice: A systematic review. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22(ahead of print). https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231152449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Syrjämäkia, M., Reunamob, J., Pesonenc, H., Pirttimaad, R., & Kontu, E. (2023). The involvement of autistic children in early childhood education. European Journal of Special Needs Education (ahead of print), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2023.2179310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tashakkori, A., & Creswell, J. W. (2007). Editorial: The new era of mixed methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1, 3–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/2345678906293042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Templeton, M., Cuevas-Parra, P., & Lundy, L. (2023). Children’s participation in international fora: The experience and perspectives of children and adults. Children & Society, 37, 786–805. https://doi.org/10.1111/chso.12629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thunberg, S., & Arnell, L. (2022). Pioneering the use of technologies in qualitative research – A research review of the use of digital interviews. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 25(6), 757–768. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2021.1935565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tisdall, E. K. M. (2010). Not so ‘new’? Looking critically at childhood studies. Exploring children’s relationships across minority and majority worlds. ESRC Seminar Series, 29 April 2010. www.academia.edu/1970598/Not_So_New_Looking_Critically_at_Childhood_StudiesGoogle Scholar
Tisdall, E. K. M. (2015). Children and young people’s participation: A critical consideration of Article 12. In Vandenhole, W., Desmet, E., Reynaert, D., & Lembrechts, S. (Eds.). Routledge international handbook of children’s rights studies (pp. 185–200). Routledge.Google Scholar
Tisdall, E. K. M., & Cuevas-Parra, P. (2022). Beyond the familiar challenges for children and young people’s participation rights: The potential of activism. The International Journal of Human Rights, 26(5), 792–810. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2021.1968377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tisdall, E. K. M. & Punch, S. (2012). Not so new? Looking critically at childhood studies. Children’s Geographies, 10(3), 249–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2012.693376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
UN Committee on the Rights of the Child. (2009). General comment No. 12 (2009): The right of the child to be heard. Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights. www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/crc/docs/advanceversions/crc-c-gc-12.pdfGoogle Scholar
UNESCO. (2017). Early childhood care and education. UNESCO. http://en.unesco.org/themes/early-childhood-care-and-educationGoogle Scholar
UNESCO. (2020). Education for sustainable development: A roadmap. UNESCO. www.gcedclearinghouse.org/sites/default/files/resources/200782eng.pdfGoogle Scholar
UNESCO. (2023). What you need to know about early childhood care and education. UNESCO Digital Library. www.unesco.org/en/early-childhood-education/need-knowGoogle Scholar
UNICEF. (2019). An environment fit for children: UNICEF’s approach to climate change. UNICEF. www.unicef.org/media/73331/file/An-Environment-Fit-for-Children-2019.pdfGoogle Scholar
United Nations. (1989). United Nations convention on the rights of the child. Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights. www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/convention-rights-childGoogle Scholar
United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world. The 2030 agenda for sustainable development A/RES/70/1. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs Sustainable Development. https://sdgs.un.org/2030agendaGoogle Scholar
Urbina-Garcia, A., Jindal-Snape, D., Lindsay, A., et al. (2021). Voices of young children aged 3–7 years in educational research: An international systematic literature review. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 30(1), 8–31. http://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2021.1992466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaughn, L. M., & Jacquez, F. (2020). Participatory research methods – Choice points in the research process. Journal of Participatory Research Methods, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.35844/001c.13244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
White, H., & Sabarwal, S. (2014). Quasi-experimental design and methods. Methodological Briefs, Impact Evaluation No. 8. UNICEF. www.unicef-irc.org/KM/IE/img/downloads/Quasi-Experimental_Design_and_Methods_ENG.pdfGoogle Scholar
WMA Declaration of Helsinki. (6 September 2022). WMA declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Ferney-Voltaire WMA The World Medical Association. www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki-ethical-principles-for-medical-research-involving-human-subjects/Google Scholar
Wu, C., Zhang, Q., Liu, S., Wang, L., & Zhao, Q. (2022). Child executive function linking marital adjustment to peer nominations of prosocial behaviour. Journal of Marriage and Family, 85, 829–844. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamaguchi, S., Bentayeb, N., Holtom, A., et al. (2022). Participation of children and youth in mental health policymaking: A scoping review (Part 1). Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 50, 58–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-022-01223-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar