Element contents
The Pluralistic Frameworks of Ibn Rushd and Abdullahi Ahmed An-Na'im
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 January 2025
Summary
The purpose of this Element is to analyse the assiduous attempts of two Islamic political thinkers-the 12th century Andalusian philosopher Ibn Rushd and the contemporary Sudanese reformist Abdullahi Ahmed An-Na'im-to theorise Islamic politics through an approach the author refers to as 'pluralistic frameworks'. A pluralistic framework, is a systematic mediation of Islamic ethics and politics that incorporates extra-Islamic traditions of thought from diverse sources. Pluralistic frameworks selectively and self-consciously enable dialogue, synthesis, and hybridity and seek to maintain a distinct conception of Islamic ethics that concords with a preferred set of political arguments. They enable reflexivity within the ethical purview of Islam and with an awareness of the normativity of sharī'a.Both Ibn Rushd and An-Na'im reconcile sharī'a in two very different ways, but to a common end; Ibn Rushd lays out a method of harmonisation with Greek thought, while An-Na'im resorts to the radical subversion of sharia under liberal thought.
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Online ISBN: 9781009386333Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 20 February 2025
Bibliography
Abou El Fadl, K. (2013). ‘The sharīʿa’. In Esposito, J. & Shahin, E. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Islam and Politics (pp. 7–26). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Adamson, P. & Di Giovanni, M. (eds.). (2018). Interpreting Averroes: Critical Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anjum, O. (2007). Islam as a discursive tradition: Talal Asad and his interlocutors. Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East, 27(3), pp. 656–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anjum, O. (2012). Politics, Law, and Community in Islamic Thought: The Taymiyyan Moment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
An-Na’im, A. A. (1986). The Islamic law of apostasy and its modern applicability: A case from the Sudan. Religion, 16(3), 197–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
An-Na’im, A. A. (1990). Toward an Islamic Reformation: Civil Liberties, Human Rights, and International Law. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
An-Na’im, A. A. (ed.) (1992). Human Rights in Cross-Cultural Perspectives: A Quest for Consensus. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
An-Na’im, A. A. (1998). Shari’a and positive legislation: Is an Islamic state possible or viable? Yearbook of Islamic and Middle Eastern Law, 5(1), pp. 29–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
An-Na’im, A. A. (2008). Islam and the Secular State. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
An-Na’im, A. A. (2014). Islamic politics and the neutral state: A friendly amendment to Rawls? In Bailey, T. & Gentile, V. (eds.), Rawls and Religion (pp. 242–265). New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aristotle, (1996). The Politics and Constitution of Athens, ed. Everson, S., trans. B. Jowett. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Aristotle, (2000). Nicomachean Ethics, trans. R. Crisp. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arkoun, M. (1994). Rethinking Islam today. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 588(1), pp. 18–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asad, T. (1993). Genealogies of Religion: Discipline and Reasons of Power in Christianity and Islam. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asad, T. (1999). Religion, nation-state, secularism. In van der Veer, P. & Hartmut, L. (eds.), Nation and Religion: Perspectives on Europe and Asia (pp. 178–196). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Asad, T. (2003). Formations of the Secular: Christianity, Islam, Modernity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Asad, T. (2009). The idea of an anthropology of Islam. Qui parle, 17(2), pp. 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auda, J. (2008). Maqasid Al-Shari’ah as Philosophy of Islamic Law. London: International Institute of Islamic Thought.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, T. (2021). A Culture of Ambiguity: An Alternative History of Islam. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belo, C. (2022). Averroes on family and property in the Commentary on Plato’s ‘Republic’. In Orwin, A. (ed.), Plato’s Republic in the Islamic Context: New Perspectives on Averroes’s Commentary (pp. 113–132). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.Google Scholar
Berman, L. V. (1967). Excerpts from the lost Arabic original of Ibn Rushd’s ‘Middle Commentary on the Nicomachean Ethics’. Oriens, 20, pp. 31–59.Google Scholar
Bilgrami, A. (2012). Secularism: Its content and context. Economic and Political Weekly, 47(4), pp. 89–100.Google Scholar
Black, A. (2001). The History of Islamic Political Thought: From the Prophet to the Present. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Bouhafa, F. (2019). Averroes’ corrective philosophy of law. In Adamson, P. & Giovanni, Matteo Di (eds.), Interpreting Averroes: Critical Essays (pp. 64–80). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Butterworth, C. (2004). Ethical and political philosophy. In Adamson, P. & Taylor, R. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Arabic Philosophy. Cambridge Companions to Philosophy (pp. 266–286). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connolly, W. E. (1999). Why I Am Not a Secularist. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Dallmayr, F. (2004). Beyond monologue: For a comparative political theory. Perspectives on Politics, 2(2), pp. 249–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devji, F. & Kazmi, Z. (eds.). (2017). Islam after Liberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Giovanni, M. (2018). Averroes, philosopher of Islam. In Adamson, P. & Giovanni, Matteo Di (eds.), Interpreting Averroes: Critical Essays. (pp. 9–26). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eickelman, D. & Piscatori, J. (1996). Muslim Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El Amine, L. (2016). Beyond East and West: Reorienting political theory through the prism of modernity. Perspectives on Politics, 14(1), pp. 102–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El Shamsy, A. (2013). The Canonization of Islamic Law: A Social and Intellectual History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emon, A. M. (2010). Islamic Natural Law Theories. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Euben, R. L. (1997). Comparative political theory: An Islamic fundamentalist critique of rationalism. Journal of Politics, 59(1), pp. 28–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Euben, R. L. (1999). Enemy in the Mirror: Islamic Fundamentalism and the Limits of Modern Rationalism: A Work of Comparative Political Theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Fadel, M. (2008). The true, the good and the reasonable: The theological and ethical roots of public reason in Islamic law. Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence, 21(1), pp. 5–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fadl, K. A. (2014). Reasoning with God: Reclaiming Shari’ah in the Modern Age. London: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Fadl, K. A. (2017). Qur’anic ethics and Islamic law. Journal of Islamic Ethics, 1(1/2), pp. 7–28. https://doi.org/10.1163/24685542-12340002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gellner, E. (1991). Islam and Marxism: Some comparisons. International Affairs, 67(1), pp. 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghannouchi, R. (2022). Public Freedoms in the Islamic State, trans. D. Johnston. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ghannouchi, R. & March, A. F. (2023). On Muslim Democracy: Essays and Dialogues. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutas, D. (2002). The study of Arabic philosophy in the twentieth century: An essay on the historiography of Arabic philosophy. British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies, 29(1), pp. 5–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, J. (1989). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1995). Reconciliation through the public use of reason: Remarks on John Rawls’ political liberalism. Journal of Philosophy, 92(3), pp. 109–131.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (2006). Religion in the public sphere. European Journal of Philosophy, 14, pp. 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, J. (2008). Notes on post‐secular society. New Perspectives Quarterly, 25(4), pp. 17–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haidar, H. H. (2006). Rawls and religion: Between the decency and justice of reasonable religious regimes. Politics and Ethics Review, 2(1), pp. 62–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallaq, W. B. (1984). Was the gate of ijtihad closed? International Journal of Middle East Studies, 16(1), pp. 3–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallaq, W. B. (2002). The quest for origins or doctrine: Islamic legal studies as colonialist discourse. UCLA Journal of Islamic and Near Eastern Law, 2(1), pp. 1–32.Google Scholar
Hallaq, W. B. (2011). Maqasid and the challenges of modernity. Al-Jami’ah: Journal of Islamic Studies, 49(1), pp. 1–31.Google Scholar
Hallaq, W. B. (2013) . The Impossible State: Islam, Politics, and Modernity’s Moral Predicament. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Harvey, R. (2023). Whose justice? When Maturidi meets MacIntyre. Justice in Islam: New Ethical Perspectives. London: International Institute of Islamic Thought.Google Scholar
Hashemi, N. (2009). Islam, Secularism, and Liberal Democracy: Toward a Democratic Theory for Muslim Societies. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hefner, R. W. (2020). Islam and covenantal pluralism in Indonesia: A critical juncture analysis. Review of Faith & International Affairs, 18(2), pp. 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbes, T. ([1651] 2008). Leviathan (Gaskin, J.C.A Ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hoover, J. (2007). Ibn Taymiyya’s Theodicy of Perpetual Optimism. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hourani, A. (1983). Arabic Thought in the Liberal Age 1798–1939. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hourani, G. H. (1961). Introduction and notes. In Hourani, G. H. (ed.), Averroës: On the Harmony of Religion and Philosophy (pp. 1–43). London: Luzac.Google Scholar
Hourani, G. F. (1985). Reason and Tradition in Islamic Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, W. S. (2001). Mahmoud Mohammed Taha and the Republican Brotherhood: Transforming Islamic society. Journal for Islamic Studies, 21, pp. 71–84.Google Scholar
Huntington, S. P. (1993). The clash of civilizations? Foreign Affairs, 72(3), pp. 22–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rushd, Ibn. (1954). The Incoherence of the Incoherence, trans. S. van den Bergh. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rushd, Ibn. (1961). On the Harmony of Religion and Philosophy, trans. G. H. Hourani. London: Luzac.Google Scholar
Rushd, Ibn. (1974). Averroes Commentary on Plato’s Republic, trans. R. Lerner. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Rushd, Ibn. (2000). The Distinguished Jurist’s Primer (2 vols.), trans. Imran Ahsan Khan Nyazee. Reading: Garnet.Google Scholar
Rushd, Ibn (2001). Exposition on Religious Arguments, trans. E. Najjar. Oxford: Oneworld.Google Scholar
Idris, M. (2018). War for Peace: Genealogies of a Violent Ideal in Western and Islamic Thought. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Idris, M. (2021a). Islam, Rawls, and the disciplinary limits of late twentieth-century liberal philosophy. Modern Intellectual History, 18(4), pp. 1034–1057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Idris, M. (2021b). The Kazanistan Papers: Reading the Muslim Question in the John Rawls Archives. Perspectives on Politics, 19(1), pp. 110–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iqtidar, H. (2011). Secularizing Islamists? Jama‘at-e-Islami and Jama‘at-ud-Da‘wa in Urban Pakistan. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Iqtidar, H. (2016). Redefining ‘tradition’ in political thought. European Journal of Political Theory, 15(4), pp. 424–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iqtidar, H. (2017). Introduction: Tolerance in modern Islamic thought. ReOrient, 2(1), pp. 5–11.Google Scholar
Iqtidar, H. (2020). Theorizing popular sovereignty in the colony: Abul Aʿla Maududi’s ‘Theodemocracy’. Review of Politics, 82(4), pp. 595–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iqtidar, H. (2021). Jizya against nationalism: Abul a‘la Maududi’s attempt at decolonizing political theory. Journal of Politics, 83(3), pp. 1145–1157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iqtidar, H. & Scharbordt, O. (2022). Divine sovereignty, morality and the state: Maududi and his influence. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society, 32(2), pp. 277–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, S. A. (2002). On the Boundaries of Theological Tolerance in Islam: Abmid Al-Ghazâlî’s Fay al Al-Tafriqa Bayna Al-Islâm Wa Al-Zandaqa. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jenco, L. K. (2011). Recentering political theory: The promise of mobile locality. Cultural Critique, 79, pp. 27–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenco, L. K., Idris, M., & Thomas, M. C. (2020). Introduction. In Comparison, Connectivity, and Disconnection (pp. 1–40). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kaminski, J. J. (2017). The Contemporary Islamic Governed State: A Reconceptualization. Cham: Palgrave MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, I. (1998). Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, trans. M. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, I. ([1785] 2012). Kant: Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Khan, S. (2017). Fallacies of foundational principles: Rawls’s political liberalism and Islamophobia. ReOrient, 3(1), pp. 50–64.Google Scholar
Kymlicka, W. (1995). Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Leaman, O. (1980). Ibn Rushd on happiness and philosophy. Studia Islamica, 52(1), pp. 167–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lerner, R. (1974). Introduction and notes. In Lerner, R. (ed.), Averroës on Plato’s Republic (pp. xiii–xxviii). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, B. (2002). What Went Wrong? The Clash between Islam and Modernity in the Middle East. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, J. ([1689] 1980). Second Treatise of Eovernment, ed. Macpherson, C. B.. Cambridge: Hackett.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. (1988). Whose Justice? Which Rationality? Notre Dame, IN: Notre Dame University Press.Google Scholar
Makdisi, G. (1991). Religion, Law and Learning in Classical Islam. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
March, A. F. (2008). Islamic Legal Theory, Secularism and Religious Pluralism: Is Modern Religious Freedom Sufficient for the Shariʿa ‘Purpose [Maqsid]’ of ‘Preserving Religion [Hifz Al-Din]?’ Islamic Law and Law of the Muslim World Paper No. 09–78, Yale Law School, Public Law Working Paper No. 208.Google Scholar
March, A. F. (2009). What is comparative political theory? Review of Politics, 71(4), pp. 531–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, A. F. (2011). Islam and Liberal Citizenship: The Search for an Overlapping Consensus. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
March, A. F. (2012). Islamic political thought. In Gaus, G., D’Agostino, F., & Muldoon, R. (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Social and Political Philosophy (pp. 204–214). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
March, A. F. (2015). Political Islam: Theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 18(1), pp. 103–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, A. F. (2019). The Caliphate of Man: Popular Sovereignty in Modern Islamic Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
March, A. F. (2023). After sovereignty: From a hegemonic to agonistic Islamic political thought. Political Theory, 52(2), pp. 259–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marenbon, J. (2007). Latin Averroism. In Akasoy, A., Montgomery, J. E., & Pormann, P. E. (eds.), Islamic Crosspollinations: Interactions in the Medieval Middle East (pp. 135–147). Exeter: Short Run Press.Google Scholar
Maududi, A. A. (1960). The Islamic Law and Constitution, ed. and trans. Ahmed, K.. Lahore: Islamic Publications.Google Scholar
Nanji, A. (1991). Islamic ethics. In Singer, P. (ed.), A Companion to Ethics (pp. 106–118). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
O’Sullivan, D. P. (2003). Punishing apostasy: The case of Islam and Shari’a law re-considered (Doctoral dissertation, Durham University).Google Scholar
Omar, A. (2019). Ibn Rushd’s The Decisive Treatise: A text for political reform. Medieval History Journal, 22(1), pp. 131–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philpott, D. (2008). Arguing with An- Na’im. Immanent Frame. 14 July. Accessed 2 June 2023. http://blogs.ssrc.org/ tif/ 2008/07/14/ arguing-with-annaim.Google Scholar
Rahman, F. (1982). Islam and Modernity: Transformation of an Intellectual Tradition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (1997). The idea of public reason revisited. University of Chicago Law Review, 64(3), pp. 765–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Razek, A. A. (2012). Islam and the Foundations of Political Power, trans. M. Loutfi. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenthal, E. I. J. (1953). The place of politics in the philosophy of Ibn Rushd. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, 15(2), pp. 246–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenthal, E. I. J. (1956). Introduction and notes. In Rosenthal, E. I. J. (ed.), Averroës Commentary on Plato’s Republic (pp. 1–18). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Roy, O. (1994). The Failure of Political Islam. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Soroush, A. (1998). The evolution and devolution of religious knowledge. In Kurzman, C. (ed.), Liberal Islam: A Sourcebook (pp. 244–251). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, D. J. (2015). Shari’a. In Bowering, G. (ed.), Islamic Political Thought: An Introduction (pp. 219–237). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Strauss, L. (1988). Persecution and the Art of Writing. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taha, M. M. (1987). The Second Message of Islam. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
Taliaferro, K. (2017). Ibn Rushd and natural law: Mediating human and divine law. Journal of Islamic Studies, 28(1), pp. 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tampio, N. (2014). Islamic political thought. In Gibbons, T. (ed.), The Encyclopaedia of Political Thought (pp. 1–10). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Von Kügelgen, A., A Call for Rationalism: “Arab Averroists” in the Twentieth Century, Alif: Journal of Comparative Poetics, 16, 97–132.Google Scholar
Wilson, M. B. (2008). The failure of nomenclature: The concept of ‘orthodoxy’ in the study of Islam. Comparative Islamic Studies, 3(2), p. 169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaman, M. Q. (2012). Modern Islamic Thought in a Radical Age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 1
- Cited by