Element contents
Series: Elements in Public Policy
How Ideas and Institutions Shape the Politics of Public Policy
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 May 2019
Summary
This Element provides a critical review of existing literature on the role of ideas and institutions in the politics of public policy with the aim of contributing to the study of the politics of public policy. Because most policy scholars deal with the role of ideas or institutions in their research, such a critical review should help them improve their knowledge of crucial analytical issues in policy and political analysis. The following discussion brings together insights from both the policy studies literature and new institutionalism in sociology and political science, and stresses the explanatory role of ideas and institutions.
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Series: Elements in Public PolicyOnline ISBN: 9781108634700Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 30 May 2019
References
Akerlof, G. A., and Kranton, R. E.. (2010). Identity Economics: How Our Identities Shape Our Work, Wages, and Well-being, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Amenta, E. (1998). Bold Relief: Institutional Politics and the Origins of Modern Social Policy, Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bacchi, C. (2012). Why study problematizations? Making politics visible. Open Journal of Political Science, 2(1): 1–8. http://file.scirp.org/pdf/OJPS20120100003_72526218.pdfCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bachrach, P., and Baratz, M. S.. (1962). Two faces of power. The American Political Science Review, 56(4): 947–952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays, Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Ban, C. (2016). Ruling Ideas: How Global Neoliberalism Goes Local, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bardach, E. (1977). The Implementation Game. What Happens After a Bill Becomes a Law, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, F. R., and Jones, B. D.. (1993). Agendas and Instability in American Politics, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, F. R., Jones, B. D., and Mortensen, P. B.. (2018). Punctuated equilibrium theory: Explaining stability and change in public policymaking. In Weible, C. M. and Sabatier, P. A., eds., Theories of the Policy Process, 4th edn. Boulder: Westview Press, pp. 55–101.Google Scholar
Béland, D. (2005). Ideas and social policy: An institutionalist perspective. Social Policy & Administration, 39(1): 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Béland, D. (2007a). Social Security: History and Politics from the New Deal to the Privatization Debate, updated paperback edn., Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Béland, D. (2007b). Ideas and institutional change in social security: Conversion, layering, and policy drift. Social Science Quarterly, 88(1): 20–38.Google Scholar
Béland, D. (2009). Ideas, institutions, and policy change. Journal of European Public Policy, 16(5): 701–718.Google Scholar
Béland, D. (2010a). Reconsidering policy feedback: How policies affect politics. Administration & Society, 42(5): 568–590.Google Scholar
Béland, D. (2010b). The idea of power and the role of ideas. Political Studies Review, 8(2): 145–154.Google Scholar
Béland, D. (2016a). Ideas and institutions in social policy research. Social Policy & Administration, 50(6): 734–750.Google Scholar
Béland, D. (2016b). Kingdon reconsidered: Ideas, interests and institutions in comparative policy analysis. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 18(3): 228–242.Google Scholar
Béland, D. (2017). Identity, politics, and public policy. Critical Policy Studies, 11(1): 1–18.Google Scholar
Béland, D., Carstensen, M. B., and Seabrooke, L., eds. (2016). Ideas, Political Power, and Public Policy, London: Routledge [reprint of special issue of Journal of European Public Policy].Google Scholar
Béland, D., and Cox, R. H., eds. (2011a). Ideas and Politics in Social Science Research, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Béland, D., and Cox, R. H.. (2011b). Introduction: Ideas and politics. In Béland, D. and Cox, R. H., eds., Ideas and Politics in Social Science Research. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 3–20.Google Scholar
Béland, D., and Cox, R. H.. (2016). Ideas as coalition magnets: Coalition building, policy entrepreneurs, and power relations. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(3): 428–445.Google Scholar
Béland, D, Foli, R., Howlett, M., Ramesh, M., and Woo, J. J.. (2018). Instrument constituencies and transnational policy diffusion: The case of conditional cash transfers. Review of International Political Economy, 25(4): 463–482. DOI:10.1080/09692290.2018.1470548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Béland, D., and Hacker, J. S.. (2004). Ideas, private institutions, and American welfare state “exceptionalism”: The case of Health and Old-Age Insurance, 1915–1965. International Journal of Social Welfare, 13(1): 42–54.Google Scholar
Béland, D., and Howlett, M.. (2016). How solutions chase problems: Instrument constituencies in the policy process. Governance, 29(3): 393–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Béland, D., and Lecours, A.. (2008). Nationalism and Social Policy: The Politics of Territorial Solidarity, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Béland, D., and Ridde, V.. (2016). Ideas and policy implementation: Understanding the resistance against free health care in Africa. Global Health Governance, X(3): 10–23.Google Scholar
Béland, D., and Viriot Durandal, J.-P.. (2003). L’expertise comme pouvoir: le cas des organisations de retraités face aux politiques publiques en France et aux États-Unis. Lien social et politiques, 50: 105–123.Google Scholar
Béland, D., and Waddan, A.. (2012). The Politics of Policy Change: Welfare, Medicare, and Social Security Reform in the United States, Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Béland, D., and Waddan, A.. (2015). Breaking down ideas and institutions: The politics of tax policy in the US and the UK. Policy Studies, 36(2): 176–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benford, R. D., and Snow, D. A. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26: 611–639.Google Scholar
Bennett, A., and Checkel, J. T., eds. (2015). Process Tracing: From Metaphor to Analytic Tool, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bennett, C. J., and Howlett, M. (1992). The lessons of leaming: Reconciling theories of policy leaming and policy change. Policy Sciences, 25: 275–294.Google Scholar
Benz, A., and Broschek, J., eds. (2013). Federal Dynamics: Continuity, Change, and the Varieties of Federalism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Berger, P. L., and Luckmann, T.. (1967). The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge, New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Berman, S. (1998). The Social Democratic Moment: Ideas and Politics in the Making of Interwar Europe, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berman, S. (2006). The Primacy of Politics: Social Democracy and the Ideological Dynamics of the Twentieth Century, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Berman, S. (2011). Ideology, history and politics. In Béland, D. and Cox, R., eds., Ideas and Politics in Social Science Research. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 105–126.Google Scholar
Berman, S. (2013). Ideational theorizing in political science: The evolution of the field since Peter Hall’s “policy paradigms, social learning and the state.” Governance, 23(6): 217–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bevir, M., and Blakely, J. (2018). Interpretative Social Science: An Anti-Naturalist Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bevir, M., and Rhodes, R. A. W.. (2003). Interpreting British Governance, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bhatia, V. (2010). Social rights, civil rights, and health reform in Canada. Governance, 23(1): 37–58.Google Scholar
Bhatia, V., and Coleman, W.. (2003). Ideas and discourse: Reform and resistance in the Canadian and German health systems. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 36(4): 715–739.Google Scholar
Bleich, E. (2003). Race Politics in Britain and France: Ideas and Policymaking since the 1960s, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Blyth, M. (1997). Any more bright ideas? The ideational turn of comparative political economy. Comparative Politics, 29(2): 229–250.Google Scholar
Blyth, M. (2002). Great Transformations: Economic Ideas and Institutional Change in the Twentieth Century, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Blyth, M., Helgadottir, O., and Kring, W.. (2016). Ideas and historical institutionalism. In Fioretos, O., Falleti, T. G., and Sheingate, A., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Historical Institutionalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 142–162.Google Scholar
Bonoli, G. (2001). Political institutions, veto points, and the process of welfare state adaptation. In Pierson, P., ed., The New Politics of the Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 238–264.Google Scholar
Boothe, K. (2015). Ideas and the Pace of Change: National Pharmaceutical Insurance in Canada, Australia, and the United Kingdom, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bradford, N. (1998). Commissioning Ideas: Canadian National Policy Innovation in Comparative Perspective, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Bradford, N. (2016). Ideas and collaborative governance: A discursive localism approach. Urban Affairs Review, 52(5): 659–684.Google Scholar
Brooks, C., and Manza, J.. (2007). Why Welfare States Persist: The Importance of Public Opinion in Democracies, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, A. L. (2003). How Policies Make Citizens: Senior Political Activism and the American Welfare State, Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, A. L. (2012). Policy makes mass politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 15: 331–351.Google Scholar
Campbell, J. L. (2002). Ideas, politics, and public policy. Annual Review of Sociology, 28: 21–38.Google Scholar
Campbell, J. L. (2004). Institutional Change and Globalization. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, J. L., and Pedersen, O. K.. (2011). Knowledge regimes and comparative political economy. In Béland, D. and Cox, R. H., eds., Ideas and Politics in Social Science Research. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 167–190.Google Scholar
Campbell, J. L., and Pedersen, O. K.. (2014). The National Origins of Policy Ideas Knowledge Regimes in the United States, France, Germany, and Denmark. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cairney, P., and Weible, C. M.. (2017). The new policy sciences: Combining the cognitive science of choice, multiple theories of context, and basic and applied analysis. Policy Sciences, 50(4): 619–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capano, G., and Galanti, M. T.. (2018). Policy dynamics and types of agency: From individual to collective patterns of action. European Policy Analysis, 4(1): 23–47.Google Scholar
Carstensen, M. B. (2010). Ideas are not as stable as political scientists want them to be: A theory of incremental ideational change. Political Studies, 59(3): 596–615.Google Scholar
Carstensen, M. B. (2011). Paradigm man vs. the bricoleur: An alternative vision of agency in ideational change. European Political Science Review, 3(1): 147–167.Google Scholar
Carstensen, M. B., and Schmidt, V. A.. (2016). Power through, over and in ideas: Conceptualizing ideational power in discursive institutionalism. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(3): 318–337.Google Scholar
Chwieroth, J. M. (2010). Capital Ideas: The IMF and the Rise of Financial Liberalization, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Clasen, J., and Siegel, N. A.. (2007). Comparative welfare state analysis and the “dependent variable problem.” In Clasen, J. and Siegel, N. A., eds., Investigating Welfare State Change: The “Dependent Variable Problem” in Comparative Analysis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 3–12.Google Scholar
Coleman, W. D., Skogstad, G. D., and Atkinson, M. M.. (1996). Paradigm shifts and policy networks: Cumulative change in agriculture. Journal of Public Policy, 16(3): 273–301.Google Scholar
Cox, R. H. (1998). The consequences of welfare reform: How conceptions of social rights are changing. Journal of Social Policy, 26(1): 1–16Google Scholar
Cox, R. H. (2001). The social construction of an imperative: Why welfare reform happened in Denmark and the Netherlands but not in Germany. World Politics, 53: 463–498.Google Scholar
Cox, R. H., and Béland, D.. (2013). Valence, policy ideas and the rise of sustainability. Governance, 26(2): 307–328.Google Scholar
Craft, J. (2016). Backrooms and Beyond: Partisan Advisers and the Politics of Policy Work in Canada, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Craft, J., and Howlett, M.. (2013). The dual dynamics of policy advisory systems: The impact of externalization and politicization on policy advice. Policy and Society, 32(3): 187–197.Google Scholar
Daigneault, P.-M. (2014). Reassessing the concept of policy paradigm: Aligning ontology and methodology in policy studies. Journal of European Public Policy, 21(3): 453–469.Google Scholar
Daigneault, P.-M., and Béland, D.. (2015). Taking explanation seriously in political science. Political Studies Review, 13(3): 384–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desmoulins, L. (2000). French public policy research institutes and their political impact as another illustration of the French exception. In McGann, J. G. and Weaver, R. K., eds., Think Tanks and Civil Societies: Catalyst for Ideas and Action. New York: Transaction Publishers, pp. 139–168.Google Scholar
Dilworth, R., and Weaver, T. P. R., eds. Forthcoming. How Ideas Shape Urban Political Development, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Dobbin, F. (1994). Forging Industrial Policy: The United States, Britain and France in the Railway Age, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, P. J., and Powell, W. W.. (1983). The Iron Cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2): 147–160.Google Scholar
Dolowitz, D. P., and Marsh, D.. (2000). Learning from abroad: The role of policy transfer in contemporary policy‐making. Governance, 13(1): 5–23.Google Scholar
Dunlop, C., and Radaelli, C. (2018). The lessons of policy learning: types, triggers, hindrances and pathologies. Policy & Politics, 46(2): 255–272.Google Scholar
Evans, P. B., Rueschemeyer, D., and Skocpol, T., eds. (1985). Bringing the State Back In, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fearon, J. D. (1999). What is Identity (As We Now Use the Word)? Palo Alto: Stanford University.Google Scholar
Fenwick, T. B. (2015). Avoiding Governors: Federalism, Democracy, and Poverty Alleviation in Brazil and Argentina, South Bend: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Fioretos, O., Falleti, T. G., and Sheingate, A., eds. (2016). The Oxford Handbook of Historical Institutionalism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fischer, F. (2003). Reframing Public Policy: Discursive Politics and Deliberative Practices, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Foli, R. (2016). Transnational actors and policymaking in Ghana: The case of the Livelihood Empowerment Against Poverty. Global Social Policy, 16(3): 268–286.Google Scholar
Forbath, W. E. (1991). Law and the Shaping of the American Labor Movement, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1997). Polemics, politics and problematizations: An Interview with Michel Foucault. In Robinow, P. (ed.), Ethics, Subjectivity and Truth [The Essential Works of Foucault (Vol. 1), 1954–1984], New York: New Press, pp. 111–119.Google Scholar
Fraser, N., and Gordon, L.. (1994). “Dependency” demystified: Inscriptions of power in a keyword of the welfare state. Social Politics, 1(1): 4–31.Google Scholar
Freeden, M. (1996). Ideologies and Political Theory: A Conceptual Approach, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Freeden, M. (2003). Ideology: A Very Short Introduction, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Freeden, M., Sargent, L. T., and Stears, M., eds. (2013). The Oxford Handbook of Political Ideologies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ganghof, S. (2017). The empirical uses of theoretical models: The case of veto player theory. Political Studies Review, 15(1): 49–59.Google Scholar
Garritzmann, J. L. (2015). Attitudes towards student support: How positive feedback effects prevent change in the four worlds of student finance. Journal of European Social Policy, 25(2): 139–158.Google Scholar
Genieys, W., and Smyrl, M., eds. (2008). Elites, Ideas, and the Evolution of Public Policy, Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Gofas, A., and Hay, C., eds. (2009). The Role of Ideas in Political Analysis: A Portrait of Contemporary Debates, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Goldstein, J., and Keohane, R. O.. (1993). Ideas and foreign policy: An analytical framework. In Goldstein, J. and Keohane, R. O., eds., Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions, and Political Change. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, pp. 3–30.Google Scholar
Green-Pedersen, C., and Walgrave, S., eds. (2014). Agenda Setting, Policies, and Political Systems: A Comparative Approach, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Greer, S., Béland, D., Lecours, A., and Dubin, K. (2019). Putting Federalism in its Place. Unpublished book manuscript.Google Scholar
Gusfield, J. R. (1980). The Culture of Public Problems: Drinking-Driving and the Symbolic Order, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Haas, P. M. (1992). Introduction: Epistemic communities and international policy coordination. International Organization, 46(1): 1–35.Google Scholar
Hacker, J. S. (1997). The Road to Nowhere: The Genesis of President Clinton’s Plan for Health Security, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hacker, J. S. (2004). Privatizing risk without privatizing the welfare state: The hidden politics of welfare state retrenchment in the United States. American Political Science Review, 98: 243–260.Google Scholar
Hacker, J. S., and Pierson, P.. (2002). Business power and social policy: Employers and the formation of the American welfare state. Politics and Society 30(2): 277–325.Google Scholar
Hajer, M. A. (1995). The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, P. A. (1986). Governing the Economy: The Politics of State Intervention in Britain and France, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, P. A. (1989). Introduction. In Hall, P. A., ed., The Political Power of Economic Ideas: Keynesianism across Nations. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 1–26.Google Scholar
Hall, P. A. (1993). Policy paradigms, social learning and the state: The case of economic policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics, 25(3): 275–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, P. A., and Soskice, D., eds. (2001). Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, P. A., and Taylor, R. C. R.. (1996). Political science and the three new institutionalisms. Political Studies, 44(5): 936–957.Google Scholar
Halligan, J. (1995). Policy advice and the public sector. In Peters, B. G. and Savoie, D. T., eds., Governance in a Changing Environment. Montréal and Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press, pp. 138–172.Google Scholar
Hansen, R., and King, D.. (2001). Eugenic ideas, political interests, and policy variance: Immigration and sterilization policy in Britain and the US. World Politics, 53(2): 237–263.Google Scholar
Hattam, V. C. (1993). Labor Visions and State Power: The Origins of Business Unionism in the United States, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hay, C. (2006). Constructivist institutionalism. In Binder, S. A., Rhodes, R. A. W., and Rockman, B. A., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 56–74.Google Scholar
Hay, C. (2011). Ideas and the construction of interests. In Béland, D. and Cox, R. H., eds., Ideas and Politics in Social Science Research. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 65–82.Google Scholar
Hay, C., and Wincott, D.. (1998). Structure, agency and historical institutionalism. Political Studies, 46(5): 951–957.Google Scholar
Heclo, H. (1974). Modern Social Politics in Britain and Sweden: From Relief to Income Maintenance, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hogan, J., and Howlett, M., eds. (2015). Policy Paradigms in Theory and Practice: Discourses, Ideas and Anomalies in Public Policy Dynamics, New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Hood, R., and Hoyle, C.. (2015). The Death Penalty: A Worldwide Perspective, 5th edn., Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Howlett, M., and Mukherjee, I., (2014). Policy design and non-design: Towards a spectrum of policy formulation types. Politics and Governance, 2(2): 57–71.Google Scholar
Howlett, M., Ramesh, M., and Perl, A.. (2009). Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems, 3rd edn., Toronto: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Huddy, L., and Bankert, A.. (2017). Political partisanship as a social identity. In Thompson, W. R., ed., Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, http://politics.oxfordre.com/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228637-e-250Google Scholar
Immergut, E. M. (1992). Health Politics: Interests and Institutions in Western Europe, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jacobs, A. M. (2009). How do ideas matter? Mental models and attention in German pension politics. Comparative Political Studies, 42(2): 252–279.Google Scholar
Jacobs, A. M. (2011). Governing for the Long Term: Democracy and the Politics of Investment, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jacobs, A. M. (2015). Process tracing the effects of ideas. In Bennett, A. and Checkel, J. T., eds., Process Tracing: From Metaphor to Analytic Tool. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 41–73.Google Scholar
Jacobs, A. M., and Weaver, R. K.. (2015). When policies undo themselves: Self-undermining feedback as a source of policy change. Governance, 28(4): 441–457.Google Scholar
Janigan, M. (2012). Let the Eastern Bastards Freeze in the Dark: The West versus the Rest since Confederation, Toronto: Knopf.Google Scholar
Jenkins-Smith, H. C., Nohrstedt, D., Weible, C. M., and Ingold, K.. (2018). The Advocacy Coalition Framework: An overview of the research program. In Weible, C. M. and Sabatier, P. A., eds., Theories of the Policy Process, 4th edn. Boulder: Westview Press, pp. 135–172.Google Scholar
Jenson, J. (1989). Paradigms and political discourse: Protective legislation in France and the United States before 1914. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 22(2): 235–258.Google Scholar
Jenson, J. (2010). Diffusing ideas for after neoliberalism: The social investment perspective in Europe and Latin America. Global Social Policy, 10(1): 59–84.Google Scholar
Jobert, B., and Muller, P.. (1987). L’État en action: politique publiques et corporatismes, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Jones, B. D., and Baumgartner, F. R.. (2005). The Politics of Attention: How Government Prioritizes Problems, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kay, A. (2007). Tense layering and synthetic policy paradigms: The politics of health insurance in Australia. Australian Journal of Political Science, 42(4): 579–591.Google Scholar
Kay, A. (2005). A critique of the use of path dependency in policy studies. Public Administration, 8(3): 553–571.Google Scholar
Kay, S. J. (1999). Unexpected privatizations: Politics and social security reform in the Southern Cone. Comparative Politics, 31(4): 403–422.Google Scholar
King, A. (1973). Ideas, institutions and the policies of governments: A comparative analysis: Part III. British Journal of Political Science, 3(4): 409–423.Google Scholar
Kingdon, J. W. (2011) [1984]. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies, updated 2nd edn., New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Laclau, E., and Mouffe, C.. (1985). Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics, London: Verso.Google Scholar
Lamont, M., and Molnár, V.. (2002). The study of boundaries in the social sciences. Annual Review of Sociology, 28: 167–195.Google Scholar
Lecours, A., ed. (2005). New Institutionalism: Theory and Analysis, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Lecours, A., and Béland, D.. (2010). Federalism and fiscal policy: The politics of equalization in Canada. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 40(4): 569–596.Google Scholar
Leff, M. H. (1983). “Taxing the ‘Forgotten Man”: The Politics of Social Security Finance in the New Deal. Journal of American History 70(2): 359–379.Google Scholar
Lepsius, M. R. (2017). Max Weber and Institutional Theory, ed. Wendt, Claus, Basel: Springer.Google Scholar
Lieberman, R. C. (2002). Ideas, institutions, and political order: Explaining political change, American Political Science Review, 96(4): 697–712.Google Scholar
Light, P. C. (1995). Still Artful Work: The Continuing Politics of Social Security Reform, New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Lindblom, C. E. (1959). The science of “muddling through.” Public Administration Review, 19(2): 79–88.Google Scholar
Lindquist, E., and Wellstead, A.. (2018). “Causal mechanisms in policy process research: Are we taking them seriously? Should we?” Paper presented at the Toronto Public Policy and Governance Workshop, March 17, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Lipsky, M. (2010) [1980]. Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services, 30th anniversary expanded edn., New York: Russel Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Lowi, T. J. (1964). American business, public policy, case-studies, and political theory. World Politics, 16(4): 677–715.Google Scholar
Lynch, J. (2006). Age in the Welfare State: The Origins of Social Spending on Pensioners, Workers, and Children, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mahon, R., and McBride, S., eds. (2008). The OECD and Transnational Governance, Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Mahoney, J. (2000). Path dependence in historical sociology. Theory and Society, 29(4): 507–548.Google Scholar
Mahoney, J., and Thelen, K., eds. (2009). Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Maioni, A. (1998). Parting at the Crossroads: The Emergence of Health Insurance in the United States and Canada, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Marier, P. (2005). Where did the bureaucrats go? Role and influence of the public bureaucracy in the Swedish and French pension reform debate. Governance, 18(4): 521–544.Google Scholar
Marsh, D. (2009). Keeping ideas in their place: In praise of thin constructivism. Australian Journal of Political Science, 44(4): 679–696.Google Scholar
McGann, J. G., and Weaver, R. K., eds. (2000). Think Tanks and Civil Societies: Catalyst for Ideas and Action, New York: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
McNamara, K. R. (1998). The Currency of Ideas: Monetary Politics in the European Union, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Mehta, J. (2011). The varied roles of ideas in politics: From “whether” to “how.” In Béland, D. and Cox, R. H., eds., Ideas and Politics in Social Science Research. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 23–26.Google Scholar
Mettler, S., and SoRelle, M.. (2018). Policy feedback theory. In Weible, C. M. and Sabatier, P. A., eds., Theories of the Policy Process, 4th edn. Boulder: Westview Press, pp. 103–134.Google Scholar
Mintrom, M., and Luetjens, J.. (2017). Policy entrepreneurs and problem framing: The case of climate change. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 35(8): 1362–1377.Google Scholar
Mintrom, M., and Norman, P.. (2009), Policy entrepreneurship and policy change. Policy Studies Journal, 37(4): 649–667.Google Scholar
Morriss, P. (2006). Steven Lukes on the concept of power. Political Studies Review, 4(2): 124–135.Google Scholar
Müller, J.-W. (2016). What is Populism? Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Myles, J., and Pierson, P.. (2001). The comparative political economy of pension reform. In Pierson, P., ed., The New Politics of the Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 305–333.Google Scholar
Nichols, T. (2017). The Death of Expertise: The Campaign against Established Knowledge and Why it Matters, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Noy, S. (2017). Banking on Health: The World Bank and Health Sector Reform in Latin America, New York: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Obinger, H., Leibfried, S., and Castles, F. G., eds. (2005). Federalism and the Welfare State: New World and European Experiences, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Orenstein, M. A. (2008). Privatizing Pensions: The Transnational Campaign for Social Security Reform, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Orloff, A. S. (1993). The Politics of Pensions: A Comparative Analysis of Canada, Great Britain and the United States, 1880–1940, Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Orren, K., and Skowronek, S. (2004). The Search for American Political Development, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ouimet, M., Landry, R., Ziam, S., and Bédard, P.-O. (2009), The absorption of research knowledge by public civil servants. Evidence & Policy, 5(4): 331–350.Google Scholar
Padamsee, T. (2009). Culture in connection: Re-contextualizing ideational processes in the analysis of policy development. Social Politics, 16(4): 413–445.Google Scholar
Palier, B. (2002). Gouverner la sécurité sociale, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Palier, B. (2005). Ambiguous agreements, cumulative change: French social policy in the 1990s. In Streeck, W. and Thelen, K., eds., Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 127–144.Google Scholar
Palier, B., and Surel, Y.. (2005). Les “trois I” et l’analyse de l’État en action. Revue française de science politique, 55(1): 7–32.Google Scholar
Parkhurst, J. (2017). The Politics of Evidence: From Evidence-Based Policy to the Good Governance of Evidence, Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Parsons, C. (2002). Showing ideas as causes: The origins of the European Union. International Organization, 56(1): 47–84.Google Scholar
Parsons, C. (2007). How to Map Arguments in Political Science, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Parsons, C. (2016). Ideas and power: Four intersections and how to show them. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(3): 446–463.Google Scholar
Peters, B. G. (2011). Institutional Theory in Political Science: The New Institutionalism, 3rd edn., London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Peters, B. G., Pierre, J., and King, D. S.. (2005). The politics of path dependence: Political conflict in historical institutionalism. Journal of Politics, 67(4): 1275–1300.Google Scholar
Pfau-Effinger, B. (2005). Culture and welfare state policies: Reflections on a complex interrelation. Journal of Social Policy, 34(1): 3–20.Google Scholar
Pierson, P. (1993). When effect becomes cause: Policy feedback and political change. World Politics, 45(4): 595–628.Google Scholar
Pierson, P. (1994). Dismantling the Welfare State? Reagan, Thatcher, and the Politics of Retrenchment, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pierson, P. (1995). Fragmented welfare states: Federal institutions and the development of social policy. Governance, 8(4): 449–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, P. (2000). Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. American Political Science Review, 94(2): 251–267.Google Scholar
Polletta, F., and Jasper, J. M.. (2001). Collective identity and social movements. Annual Review of Sociology, 27: 283–305.Google Scholar
Pressman, J. L., and Wildavsky, A. (1984). Implementation: How Great Expectations in Washington Are Dashed in Oakland; Or, Why It’s Amazing that Federal Programs Work at All, This Being a Saga of the Economic Development Administration as Told by Two Sympathetic Observers Who Seek to Build Morals on a Foundation of Ruined Hopes (3rd edn). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Quadagno, J., and Street, D.. (2006). Recent trends in US social welfare policy: Minor retrenchment or major transformation? Research on Aging, 28(3): 303–316.Google Scholar
Rayner, J. (2015). Is there a fourth institutionalism? Ideas, institutions and the explanation of policy change. In Hogan, J. and Howlett, M. (eds.), Policy Paradigms in Theory and Practice: Discourses, Ideas and Anomalies in Public Policy Dynamics, New York: Palgrave, pp. 61–80.Google Scholar
Restier-Melleray, C. (1990). Experts et expertise scientifique: Le cas de la France. Revue française de science politique, 40(4): 546–585.Google Scholar
Rich, A. (2004). Think Tanks, Public Policy, and the Politics of Expertise. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, R. (1994). Closing the Door to Destitution: The Shaping of the Social Security Acts of the United States and New Zealand. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Rich, A., and Weaver, R. K.. (1998). Advocates and analysts: Think tanks and the politicization of expertise in Washington. In Cigler, A. and Loomis, B., eds., Interest Group Politics, 5th edn. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press, pp. 235–253.Google Scholar
Roberts, N. C., and King, P. J. (1991), Policy entrepreneurs: Their activity structure and function in the policy process. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 1(2): 147–175.Google Scholar
Rochefort, D. A., and Cobb, R. W., eds. (1994). The Politics of Problem Definition: Shaping the Policy Agenda, Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Rodrik, D. (2014). When ideas trump interests: Preferences, worldviews, and policy innovations. Journal of Economic Perspective, 28(1): 189–208.Google Scholar
Sabatier, P. A. (1988). An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein. Policy Sciences, 21(2/3): 129–168.Google Scholar
Sabatier, P. A., and Jenkins-Smith, H. C., eds. (1993). Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach, Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Saint-Martin, D. (2000). Building the New Managerialist State: Consultants and the Politics of Public Sector Reform in Comparative Perspective, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schattschneider, E. E. (1935). Politics, Pressures and the Tariff, New York: Prentice‐Hall.Google Scholar
Schickler, E. (2001). Disjointed Pluralism: Institutional Innovation and the Development of the US Congress, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Schlager, E. (1995). Policy making and collective action: Defining coalitions within the Advocacy Coalition Framework. Policy Sciences, 28(3): 243–270.Google Scholar
Schlager, E, and Cox, M.. (2018). The IAD Framework and the SES Framework: An introduction and assessment of the Ostrom Workshop Frameworks. In Weible, C. M. and Sabatier, P. A., eds., Theories of the Policy Process, 4th edn. Boulder: Westview Press, pp. 215–252.Google Scholar
Schmidt, V. A. (2002a). Does discourse matter in the politics of welfare state adjustment? Comparative Political Studies, 35(2): 168–193.Google Scholar
Schmidt, V. A. (2002b). The Futures of European Capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schmidt, V. A. (2008). Discursive institutionalism: The explanatory power of ideas and discourse. Annual Review of Political Science, 11: 303–326.Google Scholar
Schmidt, V. A. (2011). Reconciling ideas and institutions through discursive institutionalism. In Béland, D. and Cox, R. H., eds., Ideas and Politics in Social Science Research. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 47–82.Google Scholar
Schneider, A., and Ingram, H.. (1993). Social construction of target populations: Implications for politics and policy. American Political Science Review, 87(2): 334–347.Google Scholar
Schön, D. A., and Rein, M.. (1994). Frame Reflection: Toward the Resolution of Intractable Policy Controversies, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Shanahan, E. A., Jones, M. D., McBeth, M. K., and Radaelli, C.. (2018). The narrative policy framework. In Weible, C. M. and Sabatier, P. A., eds., Theories of the Policy Process, 4th edn. Boulder: Westview Press, pp. 173–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sides, J., Tesler, M., and Vavreck, L.. (2018). Identity Crisis: The 2016 Presidential Campaign and the Battle for the Meaning of America, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1957). Models of Man, Social and Rational: Mathematical Essays on Rational Human Behavior in a Social Setting, New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Skocpol, T. (1992). Protecting Soldiers and Mothers: The Political Origins of Social Policy in the United States, Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of the Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Skogstad, G., ed. (2011). Policy Paradigms, Transnationalism, and Domestic Politics, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Somers, M., and Block, F.. (2005). From poverty to perversity: Ideas, markets, and institutions over 200 years of welfare debate. American Sociological Review, 70(2): 260–287.Google Scholar
Steensland, B. (2008). The Failed Welfare Revolution: America’s Struggle over Guaranteed Income Policy, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Steinmo, S., and Watts, J.. (1995). It’s the institutions stupid! Why comprehensive health insurance always fails in America. Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, 20(2): 329–372.Google Scholar
Steinmo, S., Thelen, K., and Longstreth, F., eds. (1992). Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stiller, Sabina. 2010. Ideational Leadership in German Welfare State Reform: How Politicians and Policy Ideas Transform Resilient Institutions, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Stone, D. (2004). Transfer agents and global networks in the transnationalisation of policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 11(3): 545–566.Google Scholar
Stone, D. (2012). Policy Paradox: The Art of Political Decision Making, 3rd edn., New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Stone, D., and Denham, A., eds. (2004). Think Tank Traditions: Policy Analysis across Nations, Manchester: University of Manchester Press.Google Scholar
Streeck, W., and Thelen, K., eds. (2005). Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Svallfors, S. (2010). Policy feedback, generational replacement, and attitudes to state intervention: Eastern and Western Germany, 1990–2006. European Political Science Review, 2(1): 119–135.Google Scholar
Tarrow, S. (2005). The New Transnational Activism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Teles, S. (1998). “The dialectics of trust: Ideas, finance, and pension privatization in the US and the UK.” Paper presented in October at the Annual Meeting of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management (New York City).Google Scholar
Thaler, R. H., and Sunstein, C. R.. (2008). Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness, New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Thelen, K. (2004), How Institutions Evolve: The Political Economy of Skills in Germany, Britain, the United States, and Japan, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tomer, J. F. (2017). Advanced Introduction to Behavioral Economics, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Tsebelis, G. (2002). Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tilly, C. (2005). Identities, Boundaries, and Social Ties, Boulder: Paradigm Publisher.Google Scholar
Voss, J.-P., and Simons, A.. (2014). Instrument constituencies and the supply side of policy innovation: The social life of emissions trading. Environmental Politics, 23(5): 735–754.Google Scholar
Walsh, J. I. (2000). When do ideas matter? Explaining the successes and failures of Thatcherite ideas. Comparative Political Studies, 33(4): 483–516.Google Scholar
Weaver, R. K. (1989). The changing world of think tanks. PS: Political Science & Politics, 22(3): 563–578.Google Scholar
Weaver, R. K. (2010). Paths and forks or chutes and ladders: Negative feedbacks and policy regime change. Journal of Public Policy, 30(2): 136–162.Google Scholar
Weaver, T. (2016). Blazing the Neoliberal Trail: Urban Political Development in the United States and the United Kingdom, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (1978) [1922]. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Weible, C. M., and Sabatier, P. A., eds. (2018). Theories of the Policy Process, 4th edn., Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
Weible, C. M., Sabatier, P. A., Jenkins-Smith, H. C., Nohrstedt, D., Henry, A.D., and de Leon, P.. (2011). A quarter century of the Advocacy Coalition Framework: An introduction to the special issue. Policy Studies Journal, 39(3): 349–360.Google Scholar
Weir, M. (1989). Ideas and politics: The acceptance of Keynesianism in Britain and in the United States. In Hall, P. A., ed., The Political Power of Economic Ideas: Keynesianism across Nations. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 53–86.Google Scholar
Weir, M. (1992). Politics and Jobs: The Boundaries of Employment Policy in the United States, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wendt, A. (1999). Social Theory of International Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Weyland, K. (2008). Toward a new theory of institutional change. World Politics, 60(1): 281–314.Google Scholar
White, L. A. (2002). Ideas and the welfare state: Explaining child care policy development in Canada and the United States. Comparative Political Studies, 35(6): 713–743.Google Scholar
Wincott, D. (2011). Ideas, policy change and the welfare state. In Daniel, B. and Cox, R. H., eds., Ideas and Politics in Social Science Research. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 143–166.Google Scholar
Woods, N. (2006). The Globalizers: The IMF, the World Bank, and their Borrowers, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Wright Mills, C. (1959). The Sociological Imagination, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zohlnhöfer, R., Herweg, N., and Huß, C.. (2016). Bringing formal political institutions into the multiple streams framework: An analytical proposal for comparative policy analysis. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 18(3): 243–256.Google Scholar