Element contents
Geopolitics of Digital Heritage
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 January 2024
Summary
Geopolitics of Digital Heritage analyzes and discusses the political implications of the largest digital heritage aggregators across different scales of governance, from the city-state governed Singapore Memory Project, to a national aggregator like Australia's Trove, to supranational digital heritage platforms, such as Europeana, to the global heritage aggregator, Google Arts & Culture. These four dedicated case studies provide focused, exploratory sites for critical investigation of digital heritage aggregators from the perspective of their geopolitical motivations and interests, the economic and cultural agendas of involved stakeholders, as well as their foreign policy strategies and objectives. The Element employs an interdisciplinary approach and combines critical heritage studies with the study of digital politics and communications. Drawing from empirical case study analysis, it investigates how political imperatives manifest in the development of digital heritage platforms to serve different actors in a highly saturated global information space, ranging from national governments to transnational corporations.
Keywords
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Online ISBN: 9781009182072Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 08 February 2024
References
Abélès, M. (2000). Virtual Europe. In Wilson, T. M., and Bellier, I., eds., An Anthropology of the European Union. Oxford: Berg, pp. 31–52.Google Scholar
Abélès, M. (2004). Identity and Borders: An Anthropological Approach to EU Institutions. In Twenty-First Century Papers: On-Line Working Papers from The Center for 21st Century Studies, 1–26. https://minds.wisconsin.edu/handle/1793/28962Google Scholar
AIATSIS Website. (2022). Code of Ethics. https://aiatsis.gov.au/research/ethical-research/code-ethics.Google Scholar
Albinski, H., and Tow, W. (2002). ANZUS – Alive and Well after Fifty Years. Australian Journal of Politics and History, 48(2), 153–173.Google Scholar
Al-Rodhan, N. (2014). Meta-Geopolitics: The Relevance of Geopolitics in the Digital Age. E-International Relations. www.e-ir.info/2014/05/25/meta-geopolitics-the-relevance-of-geopolitics-in-the-digital-age/.Google Scholar
Amato, F., Martellozzo, F., Nolè, G., and Murgante, B. (2017). Preserving Cultural Heritage by Supporting Landscape Planning with Quantitative Predictions of Soil Consumption. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 23, 44–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2015.12.009.Google Scholar
Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Ang, I., Isar, Y. R., and Mar, P. (2015). Cultural Diplomacy: Beyond the National Interest? International Journal of Cultural Policy, 21(4), 365–381.Google Scholar
Ashworth, G. (1994). Heritage, Tourism and Sustainability. Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.Google Scholar
Ashworth, G. J., Graham, B. J., and Tunbridge, J. E. (2007). Pluralising Pasts: Heritage, Identity and Place in Multicultural Societies. London Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Aspinall, E. (2020). We Mustn’t Allow Our National Library’s Focus to Turn Inward. The Canberra Times, 30 May. www.canberratimes.com.au/story/6772932/we-mustnt-allow-our-national-librarys-focus-to-turn-inward/.Google Scholar
Aukia, J. (2019). Struggling for Recognition? Strategic Disrespect in China’s Pursuit of Soft Power. East Asia, 36(4), 305–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Australian Government (AG). (2012). Australia in the Asian Century. White Paper. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia. https://apo.org.au/sites/default/files/resource-files/2012-10/apo-nid31647.pdf.Google Scholar
Australian Library and Information Association (ALIA). (2018). Submission in Response to the Australian Government Soft Power Review. https://read.alia.org.au/alia-submission-response-australian-government-softpower-review-october-2018.Google Scholar
Ayres, M. L. (2013). ‘Singing for their Supper’: Trove, Australian Newspapers, and the Crowd. ILFA WLIC Singapore. https://library.ifla.org/id/eprint/245/1/153-ayres-en.pdfGoogle Scholar
Badenoch, A. W. (2011). Harmonized Spaces, Dissonant Objects, Inventing Europe? Mobilizing Digital Heritage. Culture Unbound, 3, 295–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barr, M. D., and Skrbiš, Z. (2011). Constructing Singapore: Elitism, Ethnicity and the Nation-Building Project. Copenhagen: Nias.Google Scholar
Bell, E. C. (2022). Understanding Soft Power Discourse in the National Library of Australia. Journal of Documentation, 78(6), 1457–1475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bendiek, A., Godehardt, N., and Schulze, D. (2019). The Age of Digital Geopolitics. International Politics and Society Journal. www.ips-journal.eu/in-focus/chinas-new-power/article/show/the-age-of-digital-geopolitics-3593/.Google Scholar
Bertrand, M., and Kamenica, E. (2018). Coming Apart? Cultural Distances in the United States Over Time. University of Chicago. www.nber.org/papers/w24771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bettivia, R., and Stainforth, E. (2019). The Dynamics of Scale in Digital Heritage Cultures. In Lähdesmäki, T., Thomas, S. and Zhu, Y., eds., Politics of Scale: New Directions in Critical Heritage Studies. New York: Berghahn Books, pp. 50–62.Google Scholar
Bjola, C., and Holmes, M. (2015). Digital Diplomacy: Theory and Practice. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bjola, C., and Pamment, J. (2019). Countering Online Propaganda and Extremism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Björk, B., and Lundén, T. (2021). Territory, State and Nation. New York: Berghahn Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackburn, K. (2013). The ‘Democratization’ of Memories of Singapore’s Past. Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde, 169(4), 431–456. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134379-12340064.Google Scholar
Blaschke, M. (2012). Explore Historic Sites with the World Wonders Project. https://blog.google/outreach-initiatives/arts-culture/explore-historic-sites-with-world/.Google Scholar
Bogais, J., Garbuio, M., Groutsis, D. et al. (2022). Conquering ‘The Tyranny of Distance’: Australian–European Economic and Geopolitical Relationships Past, Present and Future. European Management Journal, 40(3), 310–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2022.02.003.Google Scholar
Bonacchi, C., and Krzyzanska, M. (2019). Digital Heritage Research Re-Theorised: Ontologies and Epistemologies in a World of Big Data. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 25(12), 1235–1247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonde Thylstrup, N. (2018). The Politics of Mass Digitization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Borriello, A., and Brack, N. (2019). ‘I Want My Sovereignty Back!’: A Comparative Analysis of the Populist Discourses of Podemos, the 5 Star Movement, the FN and UKIP during the Economic and Migration Crises. Journal of European Integration, 41(7), 833–853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brew, C. (2019). Making Trove More Accessible. National Film and Sound Archive Digital Directions, Canberra. https://trove.nla.gov.au/sites/default/files/2019-12/Making%20Trove%20more%20accessible.pdf.Google Scholar
Brew, C. (2020). Trove Preview – What’s the Same and What’s Changed. Trove Blog. https://trove.nla.gov.au/blog/2020/01/29/trove-preview-whats-same-and-whats-changed.Google Scholar
Brown, D., and Nicholas, G. (2012). Protecting Indigenous Cultural Property in the Age of Digital Democracy: Institutional and Communal Responses to Canadian First Nations and Māori Heritage Concerns. Journal of Material Culture, 17(3), 307–324.Google Scholar
Bui, H., and Lee, T. (2015). Commodification and Politicization of Heritage: Implications for Heritage Tourism at the Imperial Citadel of Thang Long, Hanoi (Vietnam). ASEAS – Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies, 8(2), 187–202.Google Scholar
Byrne, D. (1996). Deep Nation: Australia’s Acquisition of an Indigenous Past. Aboriginal History, 20, 82–107.Google Scholar
Caines, M. (2013). Arts head: Amit Sood, Director, Google Cultural Institute. The Guardian, 3 December. www.theguardian.com/culture-professionals-network/culture-professionals-blog/2013/dec/03/amit-sood-google-cultural-institute-art-project.Google Scholar
Calligaro, O. (2021). European Identity Between Culture and Values: From European Heritage to “Our European Way of Life”. In Foret, F., and Vargovčíková, J., eds., Value Politics in the European Union. London: Routledge, pp. 133–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, F., and Kenderdine, S. (2007). Theorizing Digital Cultural Heritage: A Critical Discourse. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, F., and Mengler, S. (2015). Transvisuality, Geopolitics and Cultural Heritage in Global Flows: The Israeli-Palestinian Conflict and The Death of the Virtual Terrorist. In Christensen, T., Michelsen, A., and Wiegand, F., eds., Transvisuality: The Cultural Dimension of Visuality, 2, pp. 59–72.Google Scholar
Campaign for Accountability (CFA). (2019). Google’s Diplomatic Edge. Report. https://bit.ly/31XDbSb.Google Scholar
Candeloro, D. (2021). Digital Fashion Exhibition: Salvatore Ferragamo Museum and Google Arts & Culture. Fashion Communication, 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81321-5_11.Google Scholar
Castells, M. (2008). The New Public Sphere: Global Civil Society, Communication Networks, and Global Governance. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616(1), 78–93.Google Scholar
Caswell, M., Gabiola, J., Zavala, J., Brilmyer, G., and Cifor, M. (2018). Imagining Transformative Spaces: The Personal-Political Sites of Community Archives. Archival Science, 18, 73–93.Google Scholar
Caswell, M., Harter, C., and Bergis, J. (2017). Diversifying the Digital Historical Record: Integrating Community Archives in National Strategies for Access to Digital Cultural Heritage. D-Lib Magazine, 23(5–6). www.dlib.org/dlib/may17/caswell/05caswell.htmlGoogle Scholar
Cheney-Lippold, J. (2011). A New Algorithmic Identity: Soft Biopolitics and the Modulation of Control. Theory, Culture and Society, 28(6), 164–181.Google Scholar
Cheng, N. (2018). This is my Doodle: Non-Participation, Performance, and the Singapore Memory Project. Performance Paradigm. https://performanceparadigm.net/index.php/journal/article/view/213.Google Scholar
Chew, I., and Haliza, J. (2013). Preserving the Crowdsourced Memories of a Nation, The Singapore Memory Project. In Duranti, L. and Elizabeth, S., eds., The Memory of the World in the Digital Age: Digitization and Preservation. Vancouver: UNESCO and The University of British Columbia, pp. 354–365.Google Scholar
Chong, A. (2010). Small State Soft Power Strategies: Virtual Enlargement in the Cases of the Vatican City State and Singapore. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 23(3), 383–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2010.484048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chong, T. (2005). Singapore’s Cultural Policy and Its Consequences: From Global To Local. Critical Asian Studies, 37(4), 553–568.Google Scholar
Christen, K., Davis, L., Griffith, Z., and Neely, J. (2018). Traditional Knowledge and Digital Archives: An Interview with Kim Christen. disClosure: A Journal of Social Theory, 27(5), 8–14. https://doi.org/10.13023/disclosure.27.02.Google Scholar
Chua, B. Ht. (2006). Communitarian Ideology and Democracy in Singapore. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ciolfi, L., Damala, A., Hornecker, E., Lechner, M., and Maye, L. (2017). Cultural Heritage Communities. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Coe, P. (1994). The Struggle for Aboriginal Sovereignty. Social Alternatives, 13, 10–12.Google Scholar
Conti, G. (2009). Googling Security: How Much Does Google Know about You? Boston: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Cook, T. (2013). Evidence, Memory, Identity, and Community: Four Shifting Archival Paradigms. Archival Science, 13, 95–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coombe, R., and Weiss, L. (2015). Neoliberalism, Heritage Regimes, and Cultural Rights. In Meskell, L., ed., Global Heritage: A Reader. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell, pp. 43–69.Google Scholar
Cooper, M. (2015). Google Cultural Institute Puts Us All Onstage. The New York Times. 1 December. www.nytimes.com/2015/12/02/arts/music/google-cultural-institute-puts-us-all-onstage.html.Google Scholar
Cousins, J. (2017). Creating a Renaissance for the Library in the Digital Era. Liber Quarterly, 26(4), 260–272.Google Scholar
Cowin, J. (2020). Digital Worlds and Transformative Learning: Google Expeditions, Google Arts and Culture, and the Merge Cube. International Research and Review, 10(1), 42–53.Google Scholar
Curthoys, A. (1999). Expulsion, Exodus and Exile in White Australian Historical Mythology Journal of Australian Studies, 23(61), 1–19.Google Scholar
Curtin, P. A., and Gaither, T. K. (2007). International Public Relations: Negotiating Culture, Identity, and Power. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Dalbello, M. (2004). Institutional Shaping of Cultural Memory: Digital Library as Environment for Textual Transmission. Library Quarterly, 74(3), 265–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalbello, M. (2009). Cultural Dimensions of Digital Library Development, Part II: The Cultures of Innovation in Five European National Libraries (Narratives of Development). Library Quarterly, 79(1), 1–72.Google Scholar
Daley, B. (2021). Making Europeana Collections Multilingual. https://pro.europeana.eu/post/making-europeana-collections-multilingual.Google Scholar
Dallwitz, D., Dallwitz, J., and Lowish, S. (2019). A ra Irititja and A ra Winki in the APY Lands: Connecting Archives to Communities through Mobile Apps on Portable Devices. Archives and Manuscripts, 47(1), 35–52.Google Scholar
Davis, B. (2016). Google’s Sprawling New Art App Has Grand Ambitions But Is Still Pretty Clunky. Artnet News. https://news.artnet.com/art-world/google-arts-culture-app-grand-ambitions-566183.Google Scholar
Davis, B. (2017). Google Disrupts Curating Via Artificial Intelligence. Artnet News. https://news.artnet.com/art-world/google-artificial-intelligence-812147.Google Scholar
De Largy Healy, J., and Glowczewski, B. (2016). Indigenous and Transnational Values in Oceania: Heritage Reappropriation, From Museums to the World Wide Web. eTropic: Electronic Journal of Studies in the Tropics, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.25120/etropic.13.2.2014.3313.Google Scholar
Delanty, G. (1995). Inventing Europe: Idea, Identity, Reality. London: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Deng, M. (2020). Singapore as Non-Place: National Cinema Through the Lens of Temporal Heterogeneity. Asian Cinema, 31(1), 37–53. https://doi.org/10.1386/ac_00012_1.Google Scholar
Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, Australia (DFAT). (2022a). United Kingdom Country Brief. www.dfat.gov.au/geo/united-kingdom/Pages/united-kingdom-country-brief.Google Scholar
Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, Australia (DFAT). (2022b). China-Australia Free Trade Agreement. www.dfat.gov.au/trade/agreements/in-force/chafta/Pages/australia-china-fta.Google Scholar
Department of Home Affairs, Australia (DHA). (2022). Country Profiles. www.homeaffairs.gov.au/research-and-statistics/statistics/country-profiles/profiles.Google Scholar
Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development and Communications, Australia (DITRDCA). (2020). $8 Million to Enhance Australia’s Trove Portal. www.arts.gov.au/departmental-news/8-million-enhance-australias-trove-portal.Google Scholar
Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development and Communications, Australia (DITRDCA). (2023). National Cultural Policy – Revive: A Place for Every Story, a Story for Every Place. www.arts.gov.au/publications/national-cultural-policy-revive-place-every-story-story-every-place.Google Scholar
Department of Statistics Singapore (DoSS). (2022). Environment. https://bit.ly/3pWJIKJGoogle Scholar
De Cesari, C. (2013). Thinking Through Heritage Regimes. In Bendix, R. F., Eggert, A., and Peselmann, A., eds., Heritage Regimes and the State. Göttingen: Universitätsverlag Göttingen Press, pp. 399–413.Google Scholar
De Cesari, C. (2020). Heritage beyond the Nation-State? Current Anthropology, 61(1), 30–56. https://doi.org/10.1086/707208.Google Scholar
Di Blasio, M., and Di Blasio, R. (1983). Constructing a Cultural Context Through Museum Storytelling. Roundtable Reports, 8(3), 7–9.Google Scholar
Dijkink, G. (1998). Geopolitical Codes and Popular Representations. GeoJournal, 46(4), 293–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dittmer, J., and Bos, D. (2019). Popular Culture, Geopolitics, and Identity. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Dittmer, J., and Gray, N. (2010). Popular Geopolitics 2.0: Towards New Methodologies of the Everyday. Geography Compass, 4(11), 1664–1677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodds, K., Kuus, M., and Sharp, J. (2016). Introduction: Geopolitics and Its Critics. In Dodds, K., Kuus, M., and Sharp, J., eds., The Ashgate Research Companion to Critical Geopolitics. London: Routledge, pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
Dunin-Wąsowicz, R. (2015). Culture for Europe: Struggles for Contemporary Meanings and Social Understandings of Europe through Cultural Institutions, Festivals, and Art Projects. PhD Thesis, London School of Economics.Google Scholar
Dyson, G. (2012). Turing’s Cathedral: The Origins of the Digital Universe. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Edwards, A. (2010). What’s Your Message? RunCoCo’s Crowdsourcing Lessons from The Great War Archive. RunCoCo Blog. https://blogs.it.ox.ac.uk/runcoco/2010/09/24/whats-your-message/.Google Scholar
Elad, S. (2010). Google and the Digital Divide: The Bias of Online Knowledge. Oxford: Chandos.Google Scholar
Erway, R. (2009). A View on Europeana from the US Perspective. Liber Quarterly, 19(2), 103–121.Google Scholar
Europa. (2010). i2010 strategy for an Innovative and Inclusive European Information Society. http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/doc/factsheets/035-i2010-en.pdf.Google Scholar
Europa. (2018). New European Agenda for Culture. https://culture.ec.europa.eu/policies/strategic-framework-for-the-eus-cultural-policy.Google Scholar
Europa. (2022). EU Motto. https://european-union.europa.eu/principles-countries-history/symbols/eu-motto_en.Google Scholar
European Commission (EC). (2016). Joint Communication to the European Parliament and the Council, Towards an EU Strategy for International Cultural Relations. https://eurlex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=JOIN%3A2016%3A29%3AFIN.Google Scholar
European Commission (EC). (2021a). EC Recommendation on a Common European Data Space for Cultural Heritage. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32021H1970.Google Scholar
European Commission (EC). (2021b). The Digital Europe Programme 2021–2022. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/activities/work-programmes-digital.Google Scholar
Europeana. (2011). Strategic Plan 2011–2015. https://pro.europeana.eu/files/Europeana_Professional/Publications/Strategic%20Plan%202011–2015%20%28colour%29.pdf.Google Scholar
Europeana. (2014). Europeana Strategy 2015–2020. http://pro.europeana.eu/files/Europeana_Professional/Publications/Europeana%20Strategy%202020.pdf.Google Scholar
Europeana. (2020). Strategic Plan 2020–2025. https://pro.europeana.eu/files/Europeana_Professional/Publications/EU2020StrategyDigital_May2020.pdf.Google Scholar
Europeana Conference (EC). (2022). Culture & Tourism: From a Project Case Study Toward Data Spaces Synergies. https://youtu.be/YjQqPV8CEjM.Google Scholar
Europeana Storytelling Task Force (ESTF). (2021). Europeana as a Powerful Platform for Storytelling: Report and Recommendations. https://pro.europeana.eu/project/europeana-as-a-powerful-platform-for-storytelling.Google Scholar
Evans, J., and Wilson, J. Z. (2018). Inclusive Archives and Recordkeeping: Towards a Critical Manifesto. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 24(8), 857–860.Google Scholar
Fiott, D. (2021). In Search of Meaning and Action. In Fiott, D., ed., European Sovereignty: Strategy and Interdependence. Paris: European Union Institute for Security Studies. Chaillot Paper, 169, 4–6.Google Scholar
flickr, . (2022). PictureAustralia Australia Day Group to Close After 20 November. Trove: Australia in Pictures. www.flickr.com/groups/pictureaustralia_ppe/discuss/72157594353310827/.Google Scholar
Flinn, A., Stevens, M., and Shepherd, E. (2009). Whose Memories, Whose Archives? Independent Community Archives, Autonomy, and the Mainstream. Archival Science, 9, 71–86.Google Scholar
Flint, C. (2022). Putting the ‘Geo’ into Geopolitics: A Heuristic Framework and the Example of Australian Foreign Policy. GeoJournal, 87(4), 2577–2592.Google Scholar
Foo, S., Tang, C., and Ng, J. (2010). Libraries for Life: A Case Study of National Library Board, Singapore. International Conference commemorating the 40th Anniversary of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, Seoul, Korea, October 8.Google Scholar
Foreign Policy (FP). (2019). FP’s Diplomat of the Year. Foreign Policy. https://foreignpolicy.com/fp-diplomat-of-the-year/.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1991). Governmentality. In Burchell, G., Gordon, C., and Miller, P., eds., The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality. London: Wheatsheaf Harvester, pp. 87–104.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (2002). Archaeology of Knowledge. Trans. A. M. Sheridan Smith. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Freire, N., Meijers, E., Voorburg, R., and Isaac, A. (2018). Aggregation of Cultural Heritage Datasets through the Web of Data. Procedia Computer Science, 137, 120–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.09.012.Google Scholar
Gajardo, T., and Lau, Y. (2017). The Woman Who is Bringing Museums & Cultural Sites from All Over the World to your fingertips. The Artling, March 15. https://theartling.com/en/artzine/interview-head-google-arts-culture-suhair-khan/.Google Scholar
Gibson, C. (1999). Cartographies of the Colonial and Capitalist State: A Geopolitics of Indigenous Self-determination in Australia. Antipode, 31, 45–79.Google Scholar
Gibson, C. (2016). Indigenous Geopolitics. In Dodds, K., Kuus, M., and Sharp, J., eds., The Ashgate Research Companion to Critical Geopolitics. London: Routledge, pp. 421–438.Google Scholar
Gibson, W. (1993). Disneyland with the Death Penalty. Wired. www.wired.com/1993/04/gibson-2/.Google Scholar
Gillespie, T. (2014). The Relevance of Algorithms. In Gillespie, T., Boczkowski, P., and Foot, K., eds., Media Technologies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 167–194.Google Scholar
Glovine, A. M. (2008). The Heritage-Scape: UNESCO, World Heritage, and Tourism. Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Goh, D. P. S. (2013). Walking the Global City. Space and Culture, 17(1), 16–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331212451686.Google Scholar
Google Arts & Culture (GAC). (2022a). Partners. https://about.artsandculture.google.com/partners/.Google Scholar
Google Arts & Culture (GAC). (2022b). About. https://about.artsandculture.google.com/partners/.Google Scholar
Google Arts & Culture (GAC). (2022c). Arts & Culture Experiments. https://experiments.withgoogle.com/collection/arts-culture.Google Scholar
Google Arts & Culture (GAC). (2022d). Wonders of Vietnam. https://artsandculture.google.com/project/wonders-of-vietnam.Google Scholar
Google Arts & Culture (GAC). (2023). World Wonders. https://artsandculture.google.com/project/explore-world-heritage.Google Scholar
Gramer, R. (2017). Denmark Creates the World’s First Ever Digital Ambassador. Foreign Policy. https://foreignpolicy.com/2017/01/27/denmark-creates-the-worlds-first-ever-digital-ambassador-technology-europe-diplomacy/.Google Scholar
Grau, D. (2021). Under Discussion: The Encyclopedic Museum. Los Angeles, CA: Getty Research Institute.Google Scholar
Gray, J. E. (2020). Google Rules: The History and Future of Copyright under the Influence of Google. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grincheva, N. (2012). Canada’s Got Treasures! Constructing National Identity through Cultural Participation. In Austen, S., Bishop, Z., Deventer, K., Lala, R., and Ramos, M., eds., The Cultural Component of Citizenship. Brussels: European House for Culture, pp. 79–99.Google Scholar
Grincheva, N. (2019). The Form and Content of ‘Digital Spatiality’: Mapping the Soft Power of DreamWorks Animation in Asia. Asiascape: Digital Asia, 6(1), 58–83.Google Scholar
Gustin, S. (2013). Google Unveils Tools to Access Web from Repressive Countries. The Business Times. 21 October. https://business.time.com/2013/10/21/google-digital-rebels/.Google Scholar
Hall, S. (1992). The West and the Rest: Discourse and Power. In Hall, S., and Gieben, B., eds., Formations of Modernity. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press in association with the Open University, pp. 185–227.Google Scholar
Hall, S. (1999). Un-Settling ‘The Heritage’, Re-Imagining the Post-Nation. Whose Heritage? Third Text, 13(49), 3–13.Google Scholar
Harvey, D.C. (2001). Heritage Pasts and Heritage Presents: temporality, meaning and the scope of heritage studies. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 7(4), 319–138.Google Scholar
Heng, D., Thiam, S., and Aljunied, S. M. (2009). Reframing Singapore: Memory, Identity, Trans-Regionalism. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herwitz, D. (2012). Heritage, Culture, and Politics in the Postcolony. NYC: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Higgott, R. (2020). EU Cultural Diplomacy: A Contextual Analysis of Constraints and Opportunities. In Carta, C., and Higgott, R., eds., Cultural Diplomacy in Europe: Between the Domestic and the International. London, Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 19–40.Google Scholar
Hill, M., and Kwen, F. L. (2016). The Politics of Nation Building and Citizenship in Singapore. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hillis, K., Petit, M., and Jarrett, K. (2012). Google and the Culture of Search. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, E., and Ranger, T. (1992). The Invention of Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Holley, H. (2011). Trove: Innovation in Access to Information in Australia Ariadne, 64. www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue64/holley/.Google Scholar
Hooton, F. (2006). PictureAustralia and the flickr Effect NLA Gateways, 80. https://webarchive.nla.gov.au/awa/20060529045055/http://pandora.nla.gov.au/pan/11779/20060524-0000/www.nla.gov.au/pub/gateways/issues/80/story01.html.Google Scholar
Hooton, F. (2007). Democratising History: Evaluating PictureAustralia’s flickr Pilot Project. NLA Gateways, 84. https://webarchive.nla.gov.au/awa/20070525063525/http://pandora.nla.gov.au/pan/11779/20070524-0000/www.nla.gov.au/pub/gateways/issues/84/story13.html.Google Scholar
Hulsman, J. C. (2019). Digital Geopolitics and Political Risk. Aspenia Online. https://aspeniaonline.it/digital-geopolitics-and-political-risk/.Google Scholar
Hunt, W. A. (2010). Google’s Foreign Policy: And a Wider East/West Geopolitical Shift. The International Journal of Science in Society, 1(4), 105–114. https://doi.org/10.18848/1836-6236/cgp/v01i04/51507.Google Scholar
Isaac, A. (2013). Europeana Data Model Primer. https://pro.europeana.eu/files/Europeana_Professional/Share_your_data/Technical_requirements/EDM_Documentation/EDM_Primer_130714.pdf.Google Scholar
Ismail, F. (2013). Real History is Written in People’s Everyday Lives. New Straits Times, 26 March. http://www.nst.com.my/nation/general/real-history-is-written-in-people-s-everyday-lives-1.241799.Google Scholar
Jeanneney, J. (2007). Google and the Myth of Universal Knowledge: A View from Europe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jiang, M. (2013). The Business and Politics of Search Engines: A Comparative Study of Baidu and Google’s Search Results of Internet Events in China. New Media & Society, 16(2), 212–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813481196.Google Scholar
Jin, D. Y. (2017). Digital Platforms, Imperialism and Political Culture. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jin, T. (2022). Virtual Wonders: Google Arts & Culture Makes Art Accessible to All. AmCham China. www.amchamchina.org/virtual-wonders-google-arts-culture-makes-art-accessible-to-all/.Google Scholar
Johns, A. (2018). The Promise and Peril of Universal Libraries. www.abaa.org/member-articles/the-promise-and-peril-of-universal-libraries.Google Scholar
Johnston, C. (2021). A Pathway to Intangible Cultural Heritage Protection?: Examining the Victorian Legislation in the context of Australian Heritage Practice Historic Environment, 33(1/2), 62–80.Google Scholar
Kaihao, W. (2018). Spanish Pilgrimage Route Soon in Baidu Encyclopedia. China Daily. www.chinadailyhk.com/articles/228/66/156/1518064537773.html.Google Scholar
Kalay, Y. E., Kvan, T., and Affleck, J. (2007). New Heritage: New Media and Cultural Heritage. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kaplan, R. (2012). The Revenge of Geography: What The Map Tells Us About Coming Conflicts and the Battle Against Fate. NYC: Random House.Google Scholar
Kathiravelu, L. (2017). Rethinking Race: Beyond the CMIO Categorisations. Dr.ntu.edu.sg. https://hdl.handle.net/10356/152310.Google Scholar
Kawasaki, K. (2004). Cultural Hegemony of Singapore among ASEAN Countries: Globalization and Cultural Policy. International Journal of Japanese Sociology, 13(1), 22–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6781.2004.00051.x.Google Scholar
Kelley, R. (2014). Agency Change: Diplomatic Action Beyond the State. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Kersel, M., and Luke, C. (2015). Civil Societies? Heritage Diplomacy and Neo-Imperialism. In Meskell, L., ed., Global Heritage: A Reader. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell, pp. 70–93.Google Scholar
King, R. (2008). The Singapore Miracle, Myth and Reality. Inglewood, WA: Insight Press.Google Scholar
Kizhner, I., Terras, M., Rumyantsev, M. et al. (2021). Digital Cultural Colonialism: Measuring Bias in Aggregated Digitized Content Held in Google Arts and Culture. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 36(3), 607–640.Google Scholar
Kizhner, I., Terras, M., Rumyantsev, M., Sycheva, K., and Rudov, I. (2018). Accessing Russian Culture Online: The Scope of Digitization in Museums Across Russia. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 34(2), 350–367. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqy035.Google Scholar
Knutsen, T. L. (2014). Halford J. Mackinder, Geopolitics, and the Heartland Thesis. The International History Review, 36(5), 835–857. www.jstor.org/stable/24703263.Google Scholar
Labadi, S. (2005). A Review of the Global Strategy for a Balanced, Representative and Credible World Heritage List 1994–2004. Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites,7, 89–102.Google Scholar
Lähdesmäki, T. (2014). The EU’s Explicit and Implicit Heritage Politics European Societies, 16(3), 401–421.Google Scholar
Lähdesmäki, T., Čeginskas, V. L., Kaasik-Krogerus, S., Mäkinen, K., and Turunen, J. (2020). Creating and Governing Cultural Heritage in the European Union: The European Heritage Label. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lähdesmäki, T., Suzie, T., and Zhu, J. (eds.) (2019). Politics of Scale. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Larson, C. (2010). State Department Innovator Goes to Google. Foreign Policy, 7 September. https://foreignpolicy.com/2010/09/07/state-department-innovator-goes-to-google/.Google Scholar
Li, J., He, L., Sung, H. and Shengnan, M. (2014). Forbidden City: Imperial Treasures from the Palace Museum, Beijing. Richmond: Virginia Museum of Fine Arts.Google Scholar
Lee, H. L. (2011). PMO | National Day Rally 2011. Prime Minister’s Office Singapore. 21 August 2019. https://bit.ly/3AYv3EZ.Google Scholar
Lee, T. (2004). Popularising Policy: (Re)forming Culture and the Nation in Singapore. Asia Pacific Journal of Arts and Cultural Management, 2(1), 55–69.Google Scholar
Lee, T. (2012). The Media, Cultural Control and Government in Singapore. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lee, W. (2014). Amit Sood, founder of Google Art Project, talks about how technology changes experience of viewing art. Herald Interview, 22 September.Google Scholar
Lévy, M., Niggemann, E., and De Decker, J. (2011). The New Renaissance, Report of the Comité des Sages on Bringing Europe’s Cultural Heritage Online. Brussels: Publications Office. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2759/45571.Google Scholar
Lewi, H., Smith, W., Vom Lehn, D., and Cooke, S. eds. (2020). The Routledge International Handbook of New Digital Practices in Galleries, Libraries, Archives, Museums and Heritage Sites. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Li, J., Sun, C., Xanat, V. M., and Ochiai, Y. (2022). Electroencephalography and Self-Assessment Evaluation of Engagement with Online Exhibitions: Case Study of Google Arts and Culture Culture and Computing, 316–331. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05434-1_21.Google Scholar
Li, S., and Womack, B. (2012). Google China Business Grows, ‘Continues to Thrive’, Alegre Says. Bloomberg, 24 January. www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2012-01-24/google-china-business-grows-continues-to-thrive-alegre-says#xj4y7vzkg.Google Scholar
Liaropoulos, A. (2021). EU Digital Sovereignty: A Regulatory Power Searching for Its Strategic Autonomy in the Digital Domain. In Proceedings of the 20th European Conference on Cyber Warfare and Security.24–25 June.Google Scholar
Liew, K. K., and Pang, N. (2015). Fuming and Fogging Memories: Civil Society and State in Communication of Heritage in Singapore in the Cases of the Singapore Memories Project and the ‘Marxist Conspiracy’ of 1987. Continuum, 29(4), 549–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/10304312.2015.1051806.Google Scholar
Liew, K. K., Pang, N., and Chan, B. (2014). Industrial Railroad to Digital Memory Routes: Remembering the Last Railway in Singapore. Media, Culture & Society, 36(6), 761–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443714532984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, C. (2016). Alibaba Helps Sell British Museum Products. China Daily. www.chinadaily.com.cn/world/2016-11/02/content_27255172.html.Google Scholar
Macdonald, M. (2013). Memorylands: Heritage and Identity in Europe Today. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Macmillan, F. (2017). Heritage, Imperialism and Commodification: How the West Can Always Do It Best. Europa Ethnica, 74(3–4), 114–124. https://doi.org/10.24989/0014-2492-2017-34-114.Google Scholar
MacroTrends (MT). (2022). Vietnam Tourism Statistics 2003–2022. www.macrotrends.net/countries/VNM/vietnam/tourism-statistics.Google Scholar
Madiega, T. (2020). Digital Sovereignty for Europe (Briefing PE 651.992; EPRS Ideas Papers). European Parliamentary Research Service. www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2020/651992/EPRS_BRI(2020)651992_EN.pdf.Google Scholar
Malpas, J. (2007). Cultural Heritage in the Age of New Media. In Kalay, Y. E., Kvan, T., and Affleck, J., eds., New heritage: New Media and Cultural Heritage. London: Routledge, pp. 13–26.Google Scholar
Mankekar, P. (1999). Screening Culture, Viewing Politics: An Ethnography of Television,Womanhood, and Nation in Postcolonial India. Durham, NC: Duke UniversityGoogle Scholar
Manners, I. (2002). ‘Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms?’. Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(2), 235–258.Google Scholar
Manners, I., and Diez, T. (2007). Reflecting on Normative Power Europe. In Berenskoetter, F., and Williams, M. J., eds., Power in World Politics. New York: Routledge, pp. 173–188.Google Scholar
Mansfield, E. C. (2014). Google Art Project and Digital Scholarship in the Visual Arts. Visual Resources: An International Journal of Documentation, 30(1), 110–17.Google Scholar
Marton, A. (2011). Forgotten as Data – Remembered through Information. Social Memory Institutions in the Digital Age: The Case of the Europeana Initiative. PhD Thesis, London School of EconomicsGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, D. (2022). Presentation at Data To Power Webinar: GLAM Collections and Exhibitions in Immersive Environments. www.youtube.com/watch?v=VH-Kn5hGabw&t=3689s.Google Scholar
McCrary, Q. (2011). The Political Nature of Digital Cultural Heritage. LIBER Quarterly, 20(3–4), 357–368.Google Scholar
McDonald, M. (1996). ‘Unity in Diversity’: Some Tensions in the Construction of Europe. Social Anthropology, 4, 47–60.Google Scholar
Medcalf, R. (2020). Indo-Pacific Empire: China, America, and the Contest for the World’s Pivotal Region. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Medeiros, B. (2021). ‘There’s No Way Abraham Lincoln Could Work at Google’: Fox News and the Politics of Breaking Up Big Tech. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 46(1), 39–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/01968599211039211.Google Scholar
Meskell, L., and Brumann, C. (2015). UNESCO and New World Orders. In Meskell, L., ed. Global Heritage: A Reader. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell, pp. 22–42.Google Scholar
Metakides, G. (2022). A Crucial Decade for European Digital Sovereignty. In Werthner, H., Prem, E., Lee, E. A., and Ghezzi, C., eds., Perspectives on Digital Humanism. Cham: Springer International, pp. 219–226.Google Scholar
Mignolo, W. D. (2002). The Geopolitics of Knowledge and the Colonial Difference. The South Atlantic Quarterly, 101(1), 57–96.Google Scholar
Miller, R., Ruru, J., Behrendt, L., and Lindberg, T. (2012). Discovering Indigenous Lands. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ministry of Culture, Community, and Youth (MCCY). (2013). The Report of the Arts and Culture Strategic Review, Singapore. https://bit.ly/3TwSFIn.Google Scholar
Mirrlees, T. (2013). Global Entertainment Media: Between Cultural Imperialism and Cultural Globalization. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
National Gallery Singapore Representative (NGSR). (2023). Interview by Grincheva. February 2023.Google Scholar
National Heritage Board (NHB). (2008). Renaissance City Plan III: Heritage Development Plan. NHB: Singapore.Google Scholar
National Heritage Board (NHB). (2010). Singapore’s Heritage and Museums Go Virtual with a Package of Online Initiatives. NHB’s Overall E-engagement Strategy. Singapore: NHB.Google Scholar
National Library Board (NLB). (2023). E-mail Interview by Natalia Grincheva, 27 February 2023.Google Scholar
National Library of Australia (NLA). (2009). New Directions 2009–2011. www.nla.gov.au/library/NLA_Directions_2009-2011.pdf.Google Scholar
National Library of Australia (NLA). (2020a). Collection Development Policy. www.nla.gov.au/sites/default/files/collection_development_policy_revised_2_july.pdfGoogle Scholar
National Library of Australia (NLA). (2020b). Annual Report 2019–2020. www.nla.gov.au/sites/default/files/national_library_of_australia_annual_report_2019-20.pdf.Google Scholar
National Library of Australia (NLA). (2021). Trove Strategy 2021–2023. www.nla.gov.au/sites/default/files/2022-10/Trove%20Strategy_1.pdf.Google Scholar
National Library of Australia (NLA). (2022). Annual Report 2021–2022. www.nla.gov.au/sites/default/files/2022-10/NLA%20AR%202021–22%20Web.pdf.Google Scholar
Neale, M. (2017). The Third Archive and Artist as Archivist. In Jorgensen, D., and Mclean, I., eds., Indigenous Archives: The Making and Unmaking of Aboriginal Art. Perth: University of Western Australia Press, pp. 269–294.Google Scholar
Neumann, K. (2019). In Search of ‘Australia and the Australian People’: The National Library of Australia and the Representation of Cultural and Linguistic Diversity. In Darian-Smith, K., and Hamilton, P., eds., Remembering Migration: Oral Histories and Heritage in Australia. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 285–299.Google Scholar
Ng, E. (2011). The Library as an Online Community Touch-Point. IFLA World Library and Information Congress, San Juan, Puerto Rico, 13–18 August.Google Scholar
Website, NLA. (2022). National Library of Australia 2030. www.nla.gov.au/content/national-library-of-australia-2030Google Scholar
Nye, J. S. (1990). Bound to Lead: The Changing Nature of American Power. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Nye, J. S. (2004). Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. New Delhi: Knowledge World.Google Scholar
Ó Tuathail, G., and Agnew, J. (1992). Geopolitics and Discourse: Practical Geopolitical Reasoning in American Foreign Policy. Political Geography, 11(2), 190–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/0962-6298(92)90048-x.Google Scholar
Ó Tuathail, G. (1999). Understanding Critical Geopolitics: Geopolitics and Risk Society. The Journal of Strategic Studies, 22(2–3), 107–124.Google Scholar
Ó Tuathail, G. (2005). Critical Geopolitics: The Politics of Writing Global Space. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Parkinson, G. (2020). Will Technology End the English Language’s Global Domination? https://newseu.cgtn.com/news/2020-12-26/Will-technology-end-the-English-language-s-global-domination–WfQn5ByAKI/index.html.Google Scholar
Parry, R. (2007). Recoding the Museum: Digital Heritage and the Technologies of Change. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pascoal, S., Tallone, L., and Furtado, M. (2019). Cultural Tourism: Using Google Arts & Culture Platform to Promote a Small City in the North of Portugal. Advances in Tourism, Technology and Smart Systems, 171, 47–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2024-2_5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Passerini, L. ed. (1998). The Question of European Identity: A Cultural Historical Approach. Florence: European Historical Institute.Google Scholar
Pearson, L. (2017). Opinion: Invasion Day, Survival Day, or Day of Mourning? All of the Above. Special Broadcasting Service. www.sbs.com.au/nitv/article/opinion-invasion-day-survival-day-or-day-of-mourning-all-of-the-above/4iundmt2r.Google Scholar
Peter-Agbia, P. (2022). Bringing Art to the Streets with Pop Legends BTS. https://blog.google/outreach-initiatives/arts-culture/bringing-art-to-the-streets-with-pop-legends-bts/.Google Scholar
Pin, W. W. (2014). Memory and the Nation: On the Singapore Memory Project. Alexandria: The Journal of National and International Library and Information Issues, 25(3), pp. 63–70. https://doi.org/10.7227/alx.0031.Google Scholar
Potter, E. (2002). Cyber-Diplomacy: Managing Foreign Policy in the Twenty-First Century. Montreal, QC: McGill-Queen’s Press.Google Scholar
Povroznik, N. (2018). Towards a Global Infrastructure for Digital Cultural Heritage. In Digital Heritage. Progress in Cultural Heritage: Documentation, Preservation, and Protection. EuroMed, vol. 11196. Cham: Springer, pp. 607–615. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01762-0_53.Google Scholar
Powers, S. M., and Jablonski, M. (2015). The Real Cyber war: The Political Economy of Internet Freedom. Urbana: University Of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Public Service Division (PSD). (n.d.). Cultivating a Harmonious society, Becoming One People. www.psd.gov.sg/heartofpublicservice/our-institutions/cultivating-a-harmonious-society-becoming-one-people/.Google Scholar
Punathambekarm, A., and Mohan, S. (2019). Global Digital Cultures: Perspectives from South Asia. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Quang, T., William, N., and Paulson, D. (2022). Rising Tensions: Heritage-Tourism Development and the Commodification of ‘Authentic’ Culture among the Cham Community of Vietnam. Cogent Social Sciences, 8(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2022.2116161.Google Scholar
Rahman, F. (2020). The Intersection of Emergent Technologies and Geopolitics: Implications for Singapore. S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. www.jstor.org/stable/resrep24284#metadata_info_tab_contents.Google Scholar
Regional Coordinator Asia (RCA). (2022). Interview by Natalia Grincheva. November 2022.Google Scholar
Remaking Singapore Committee (RSC). (2003). Changing Mindsets, Deepening Relationships: The Report of the Remaking Singapore Committee. Singapore: Government of Singapore.Google Scholar
Ronfeldt, D., and Arquilla, J. (1999). The Emergence of Noopolitik: Toward an American Information Strategy. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.Google Scholar
Ronfeldt, D., and Arquilla, J. (2020). Noopolitik: A New Paradigm for Public Diplomacy. In Snow, N., and Cull, N., eds., Routledge Handbook of Public Diplomacy. London: Routledge, pp. 445–480.Google Scholar
Ross, M. (2022). Oh, the Places You Will (Virtually) Go. The Mercury News. www.mercurynews.com/2022/07/21/oh-the-places-you-will-go-courtesy-of-google-arts-and-culture/.Google Scholar
Roy, D. (1994). Singapore, China, and the ‘Soft Authoritarian’ Challenge. Asian Survey, 34(3), 231–242. https://doi.org/10.2307/2644982.Google Scholar
Saran, S. (2020). Navigating the Digitisation of Geopolitics, ORF. www.orfonline.org/expert-speak/navigating-the-digitisation-of-geopolitics-60612/.Google Scholar
Sharma, K. (2017). High Culture has Been Under Lock and Key, says Google’s Amit Sood. mint. www.livemint.com/Companies/xERUCxIqSLD9Z2zmUpWVOL/High-culture-has-been-under-lock-and-key-says-Google-Cultur.html.Google Scholar
Shepherd, R. (2006). UNESCO and the Politics of Cultural Heritage in Tibet. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 36(2), 243–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472330680000141.Google Scholar
Sherratt, T. (2016). Hacking Heritage: Power and Participation in Digital Cultural Collections. 2016 Digital GLAM Symposium. http://discontents.com.au/hacking-heritage-power-and-participation-in-digital-cultural-collections/index.html.Google Scholar
Sherratt, T. (2019). Trove: Connecting Us to the Past. https://timsherratt.org/blog/trove-connecting-us/.Google Scholar
Shore, C. (2000). Building Europe: The Cultural Politics of European Integration. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Shore, C. (2006). ‘In Uno Plures’ (?) EU Cultural Policy and the Governance of Europe. Cultural Analysis, 5, 7–26.Google Scholar
Singapore 21 Committee (S21C). (2001). Singapore 21: Together, We Make the Difference. Singapore: Singapore 21 Committee. https://www.nlb.gov.sg/main/article-detail?cmsuuid=66f2445b-43c1-407a-a3e8-a89083d6f868.Google Scholar
Singapore Memory Portal (SMP). (2015). SG Heart Map. www.singaporememory.sg/campaigns/sg-heart-map?nextrecord=9&listtype=campaigns&id=115&campaign=sg-heart-map.Google Scholar
Singapore Memory Portal (SMP). (n.d.). Help & Information, Singapore Memory. www.singaporememory.sg/Help-Info.Google Scholar
Singapore Tourism Board (STB). (2000). Official Guide: Singapore New Asia. Singapore: Singapore Tourism Board.Google Scholar
SimilarWeb (SW). (2022). Google Arts and Culture Statistics. www.similarweb.com/website/artsandculture.google.com/#overview.Google Scholar
Singapore Tourist Promotion Board, & Ministry of Information and the Arts (STPB & MIA). (1995). Singapore, Global City for the Arts. Joint report.Google Scholar
Sood, A. (2015). Step on Stage with the Google Cultural Institute. Google Official Blog: Arts & Culture. https://blog.google/outreach-initiatives/arts-culture/step-on-stage-with-google-cultural/.Google Scholar
Sood, A. (2022). Techies are the New Artists, Says Google Art Czar Amit Sood. The Times of India, 10 August. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/india-business/techies-are-the-new-artists-says-google-art-czar-amit-sood/articleshow/93468078.cms?utm_source=contentofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst.Google Scholar
StatCounter Global Stats (SC). (2022). Search Engine Market Share China 2019. https://gs.statcounter.com/search-engine-market-share/all/china.Google Scholar
StatCounter (SC). (2022). Search Engine Market Share China | StatCounter Global Stats. https://gs.statcounter.com/search-engine-market-share/all/china.Google Scholar
Statista. (2022). Search Engine Market Share Worldwide | Statista. [online] Statista.www.statista.com/statistics/216573/worldwide-market-share-of-search-engines/.Google Scholar
Statistics Singapore (SS). (2023). Population in Brief. Report.www.population.gov.sg/files/media-centre/publications/population-in-brief-2023.pdf.Google Scholar
Susan, L., and Brian, W. (2012). Google China Business Grows, ‘Continues to Thrive’, Alegre Says. Bloomberg, 24 January. www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2012-01-24/google-china-business-grows-continues-to-thrive-alegre-says.Google Scholar
Tan, G. (2012). Giving the Past a Present: The Singapore Memory Project. International Conference on New Media, Memories and Histories, 5–6 October 2012, Wee Kim Wee School of Communication.Google Scholar
Tan, K. P. (2016). Choosing What to Remember in Neoliberal Singapore: The Singapore Story, State Censorship and State-Sponsored Nostalgia. Asian Studies Review, 40(2), 231–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357823.2016.1158779.Google Scholar
Tang, C. (2013). Acquiring, Organising and Providing Access to Digital Content: The Singapore Memory Project Experience. Paper presented at the IFLA World Library and Information Congress, Singapore, Future Libraries: Infinite Possibilities Singapore. https://library.ifla.org/id/eprint/214/1/198-tang-en.pdf.Google Scholar
Taylor, J., and Gibson, L. K. (2017). Digitisation, Digital Interaction and Social Media: Embedded Barriers to Democratic Heritage. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 23(5), 408–420.Google Scholar
TED. (2017). Every Piece of Art You’ve Ever Wanted to See – Up Close and Searchable | Amit Sood. www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjB6DQGalU0.Google Scholar
The White House. (2021). Remarks by President Biden, Prime Minister Morrison of Australia, and Prime Minister Johnson of the United Kingdom Announcing the Creation of AUKUS, 15 September. www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/speeches-remarks/2021/09/15/remarks-by-president-biden-prime-minister-morrison-of-australia-and-prime-minister-johnson-of-the-united-kingdom-announcing-the-creation-of-aukus/.Google Scholar
Timmers, P. (2022). The Technological Construction of Sovereignty. In Werthner, H., Prem, E., Lee, E. A., and Ghezzi, C., eds., Perspectives on Digital Humanism. Cham: Springer International, pp. 213–218.Google Scholar
Tretter, E. (2011). The ‘Value’ of Europe: The Political Economy of Culture in the European Community. Geopolitics, 16(4), 926–948.Google Scholar
Website, Trove. (2022a). Technical Specifications. https://trove.nla.gov.au/technical-specifications.Google Scholar
Website, Trove. (2022b). Cultural Safety for First Australians. https://trove.nla.gov.au/help/using-trove/cultural-safety-first-australians.Google Scholar
Tuoi Tre News (TTN). (2021). Google Arts & Culture Brings Vivid, Energetic Vietnam to the World. https://tuoitrenews.vn/news/vietnam-life/vietnamese-culture/20210122/google-arts-culture-brings-vivid-energetic-vietnam-to-the-world/58938.html.Google Scholar
Turčalo, S., and Kulović, A. (2018). Contemporary Geopolitics and Digital Representations of Space. Croatian International Relations Review, 24(81), 7–22. https://doi.org/10.2478/cirr-2018-0001.Google Scholar
Udell, M. K. (2019). The Museum of the Infinite Scroll: Assessing the Effectiveness of Google Arts and Culture as a Virtual Tool for Museum Accessibility. Master’s Projects and Capstones, 979. https://repository.usfca.edu/capstone/979.Google Scholar
UNESCO. (2009). Google and UNESCO Announce Alliance to Provide Virtual Visits of Several World Heritage Sites. https://bit.ly/2N7eHS8.Google Scholar
UNESCO. (2022). Discover the Memory of the World Register on Google Arts & Culture. www.unesco.org/en/articles/discover-memory-world-register-google-arts-culture.Google Scholar
Valtysson, B. (2012). Europeana. Information, Communication & Society, 15(2), 151–170.Google Scholar
Valtysson, B. (2018). Camouflaged Culture: The ‘Discursive Journey’ of the EU’s Cultural Programmes. Croatian International Relations Review, 24(82), 14–37.Google Scholar
Valtysson, B. (2020). Digital Cultural Politics From Policy to Practice. Cham: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Van Dijck, J., Poell, T., and de Waal, M. (2018). The Platform Society: Public Values in a Connective World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Van Ham, P. (2008). Place Branding: The State of the Art. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616(1), 126–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716207312274.Google Scholar
Verhoeven, D. (2016). As Luck Would Have It: Serendipity and Solace in Digital Research Infrastructure. Feminist Media Histories, 2(1), 7–28.Google Scholar
Wang, A. (2020). Rules of Engagement in the Global Arts City: The Case of The Substation in Singapore. In Byrnes, W., and Brkić, A., eds., The Routledge Companion to Arts Management. London: Routledge, pp. 187–202.Google Scholar
Wani, S. A., Ali, A., and Ganaie, S. A. (2019). The Digitally Preserved Old-aged Art, Culture and Artists. PSU Research Review, 3(2), 111–122. https://doi.org/10.1108/prr-08-2018-0026.Google Scholar
Werthner, H. (2022). Geopolitics, Digital Sovereignty … What’s in a Word? In Werthner, H., Prem, E., Lee, E. A., and Ghezzi, C., eds., Perspectives on Digital Humanism. Cham: Springer International, pp. 241–248.Google Scholar
Widodo, J., Wong, Y.C. and Ismail, F. (2017). Digital Historic Urban Landscape Methodology for Heritage Impact Assessment of Singapore. ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 4, 327–334.Google Scholar
Wikimedia. (2022). Characterizing Wikipedia Citation Usage: First Round of Analysis. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Characterizing_Wikipedia_Citation_Usage/First_Round_of_Analysis.Google Scholar
Wilson-Barnao, C. (2017). How Algorithmic Cultural Rcommendation Influence the Marketing of Vultural collections. Consumption Markets & Culture, 20(6), 559–574. https://doi.org/10.1080/10253866.2017.1331910.Google Scholar
Wilson-Barnao, C. (2021). Digital Access and Museums as Platforms. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429298691-1.Google Scholar
Winter, T. (2020). Geocultural Power: China’s Belt and Road Initiative. Geopolitics, 26(5), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2020.1718656.Google Scholar
Winter, T. (2021). Geocultural Power: China’s Belt and Road Initiative. Geopolitics, 26(5), 1376–1399.Google Scholar
Winter, T. (2022a). Geocultural power and the Digital Silk Roads. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 40(5), 923–940. https://doi.org/10.1177/02637758221118569.Google Scholar
Winter, T. (2022b). Geocultural Diplomacy. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 28(4), 385–399. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2021.1967943.Google Scholar
Winter, T. (2023). Heritage Diplomacy: An Afterword. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 29(1), 130–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2022.2141728.Google Scholar
World Bank (WB) (n.d.a). Literacy Rate, Adult Total (% of People Ages 15 and Above) – Singapore | Data. Data.worldbank.org. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SE.ADT.LITR.ZS?locations=SG&name_desc=true.Google Scholar
World Bank (WB). (n.d.). Individuals Using the Internet (% of Population) – Singapore | Data. Data.worldbank.org. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/IT.NET.USER.ZS?locations=SG.Google Scholar
World Bank (WB). (n.d.c). GDP (Current US$) – Singapore | Data. Data.worldbank.org. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.CD?locations=SG.Google Scholar
World Bank (WB). (2019). Vietnam’s Economy Expanded by 6.8 Percent in 2019 but Reforms are Needed to Unleash the Potential of Capital Markets. www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2019/12/17/vietnams-economy-expanded-by-68-percent-in-2019-but-reforms-are-needed-to-unleash-the-potential-of-capital-markets.Google Scholar
World Economic Forum (WEF). (2015). Which Languages Rule the Internet? www.weforum.org/agenda/2015/11/which-languages-rule-the-internet/.Google Scholar
Yeo, S. (2016). Geopolitics of Search: Google versus China? Media, Culture & Society, 38(4), 591–605. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443716643014.Google Scholar
Yeo, S. (2018). Access Now, But for Whom and at What Cost? Information, Communication & Society, 23(4), 588–604. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2018.1529192.Google Scholar
Yue, A. (2006). Cultural Governance and Creative Industries in Singapore. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 12(1), 17–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286630600613176.Google Scholar
Zheleva, E. (2011). 5 Questions with Amit Sood and James David from Google Art. Social Media Week. https://socialmediaweek.org/blog/2011/07/5-questions-with-amit-sood-and-james-david-from-googleart/.Google Scholar
Zuboff, S. (2019). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. New York: Profile Books.Google Scholar