Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-31T20:30:09.230Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
Series:   Elements in Perception

Ecological Psychology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2024

Miguel Segundo-Ortin  and
Vicente Raja
Miguel Segundo-Ortin
Affiliation:
Universidad de Murcia, Spain
Vicente Raja
Affiliation:
Universidad de Murcia, Spain

Summary

Ecological psychology is one of the main alternative theories of perception and action available in the contemporary literature. This Element explores and analyzes its most relevant ideas, concepts, methods, and experimental results. It discusses the historical roots of the ecological approach. The Element then analyzes the works of the two main founders of ecological psychology: James and Eleanor Gibson. It also explores the development of ecological psychology since the 1980s until nowadays. Finally, the Element identifies and evaluates the future of the ecological approach to perception and action.
Get access

Keywords

affordancesdirect perceptionembodied cognitionJ. J. GibsonE. J. Gibson
Type
Element
Information
Series: Elements in Perception
Online ISBN: 9781009451413
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication: 18 April 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abney, D. H., Paxton, A., Dale, R., & Kello, C. T. (2014). Complexity matching in dyadic conversation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(6), 2304–2315.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Adolph, K. E. (2019). An ecological approach to learning in (not and) development. Human Development, 63(3–4), 180–201. https://doi.org/10.1159/000503823.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Adolph, K. E., & Hoch, J. E. (2019). Motor development: Embodied, embedded, enculturated, and enabling. Annual Review of Psychology, 70(1), 141–164. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102836.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Adolph, K. E., & Kretch, K. S. (2015). Gibson’s theory of perceptual learning. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.23096-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aguilera, M., Bedia, M. G., Santos, B. A., & Barandiaran, X. E. (2013). The situated HKB model: How sensorimotor spatial coupling can alter oscillatory brain dynamics. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 7, 117. http://doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2013.00117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Agyei, S. B., Holth, M., van der Weel, F. R. (Ruud), & van der Meer, A. L. H. (2015). Longitudinal study of perception of structured optic flow and random visual motion in infants using high‐density EEG. Developmental Science, 18(3), 436–451. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12221.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Amazeen, E. L., & Turvey, M. T. (1996). Weight perception and the haptic size-weight illusion are functions of the inertia tensor. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22(1), 213–232.Google ScholarPubMed
Araújo, D., & Davids, K. (2011). What exactly is acquired during skill acquisition? Journal of Consciousness Studies, 18(3–4), 7–23.Google Scholar
Araújo, D., Davids, K., & Hristovski, R. (2006). The ecological dynamics of decision making in sport. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 7(6), 653–676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2006.07.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ash, M. G. (1995). Gestalt psychology in German culture, 1890–1967: Holism and the quest for objectivity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ayala, S. (2016). Speech affordances: A structural take on how much we can do with our words. European Journal of Philosophy, 24(4), 879–891. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejop.12186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baggs, E., & Chemero, A. (2019). The third sense of environment. In Wagman, J. & Blau, J. (Eds.), Perception as Information Detection (pp. 5–20). New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barker, R. G. (1975). Ecological psychology: Concepts and methods for studying the environment of human behavior. San Francisco, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Barker, R. G. (Ed.). (1978). Habitats, environments, and human behavior: Studies in ecological psychology and eco-behavioral science from the Midwest Psychological Field Station, 1947–1972 (1st ed). New York: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Baron, R. M. (2007). Situating coordination and cooperation between ecological and social psychology. Ecological Psychology, 19(2), 179–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/10407410701332106.Google Scholar
Bernstein, N. A. (1967). The coordination and regulation of movements. New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Bingham, G. P. (2004). A perceptually driven dynamical model of bimanual rhythmic movement (and phase perception). Ecological Psychology, 16(1), 45–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blau, J. J. C., & Wagman, J. B. (2023). Introduction to ecological psychology: A lawful approach to perceiving, acting, and cognizing. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Brancazio, N., & Segundo-Ortin, M. (2020). Distal engagement: Intentions in perception. Consciousness and Cognition, 79, 102897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2020.102897.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bruineberg, J., Chemero, A., & Rietveld, E. (2018). General ecological information supports engagement with affordances for “higher” cognition. Synthese, 196, 5231–5251.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bruineberg, J., & Rietveld, E. (2019). What’s inside your head once you’ve figured out what your head’s inside of. Ecological Psychology, 31(3), 198–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cancar, L., Díaz, A., Barrientos, A., Travieso, D., & Jacobs, D. M. (2013). Tactile-sight: A sensory substitution device based on distance-related vibrotactile flow. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, 10(6), 272. https://doi.org/10.5772/56235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carello, C., & Turvey, M. T. (2019). Challenging the axioms of perception: The retinal image and the visibility of light. In Wagman, J. & Blau, J. (Eds.), Perception as Information Detection (pp. 51–69). New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chemero, A. (2003). An outline of a theory of affordances. Ecological Psychology, 15(2), 181–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chemero, A. (2009). Radical embodied cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cisek, P. (2007). Cortical mechanisms of action selection: The affordance competition hypothesis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 362(1485), 1585–1599.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, A. (2016). Surfing uncertainty: Prediction, action, and the embodied mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costall, A. (1995). Socializing affordances. Theory & Psychology, 5(4), 467–481. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354395054001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costall, A. (2012). Canonical affordances in context. Avant: Trends in Interdisciplinary Studies, 3(2), 85–93.Google Scholar
Costall, A., & Morris, P. (2015). The “textbook Gibson”: The assimilation of dissidence. History of Psychology, 18(1), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Craig, C. M., Delay, D., Grealy, M. A., & Lee, D. N. (2000). Guiding the swing in golf putting. Nature, 405, 295–296.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Craig, C. M., & Lee, D. N. (1999). Neonatal control of nutritive sucking pressure: Evidence for an intrinsic τ-guide. Experimental Brain Research, 124, 371–382.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Craig, C., Pepping, G. J., & Grealy, M. (2005). Intercepting beats in predesignated target zones. Experimental Brain Research, 165, 490–504.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crowther, R., Pohlmann, J., & Davids, K. (2016). An ecological dynamics framework for rehabilitation of multifidus atrophy and fatty infiltration: A case study. Research to Practice, 2016. Exercise & Sports Science Australia (ESSA), Melbourne.Google Scholar
Cutting, J. E. (1978). Generation of synthetic male and female walkers through manipulation of a biomechanical invariant. Perception, 7(4), 393–405. https://doi.org/10.1068/p070393.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cutting, J. E. (1982). Two ecological perspectives: Gibson vs. Shaw and Turvey. American Journal of Psychology, 95(2), 199–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davids, K., Araújo, D., Seifert, L., & Orth, D. (2015). Expert performance in sport: An ecological dynamics perspective. In Baker, J. & Farrow, D. (Eds.), Routledge handbook of sport expertise (pp. 130–144). New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davids, K., Araújo, D., Vilar, L., Renshaw, I., & Pinder, R. (2013). An ecological dynamics approach to skill acquisition: Implications for development of talent in sport. Talent Development and Excellence, 5(1), 21–34.Google Scholar
Davids, K., Button, C., & Bennett, S. (2008). Dynamics of skill acquisition: A constraints-led approach. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.Google Scholar
Davis, T. J., Riley, M. A., Shockley, K., & Cummins-Sebree, S. (2010). Perceiving affordances for joint actions. Perception, 39(12), 1624–1644. https://doi.org/10.1068/p6712.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dewey, J. (1896). The reflex arc concept in psychology. Psychological Review, 3, 357–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewey, J. (1922[2007]). Human nature and conduct: An introduction to social psychology. New York: Cosimo.Google Scholar
van Dijk, L., & Kiverstein, J. (2020). Direct perception in context: Radical empiricist reflections on the medium. Synthese. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02578-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Dijk, L., Withagen, R., & Bongers, R. M. (2015). Information without content: A Gibsonian reply to enactivists’ worries. Cognition, 134, 210–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Djebbara, Z. (2022). Affordances in everyday life. London: Springer International.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dotov, D. G. (2014). Putting reins on the brain: How the body and environment use it. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 795. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00795.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duarte, R., Araújo, D., Correia, V., Davids, K., Marques, P., & Richardson, M. J. (2013). Competing together: Assessing the dynamics of team–team and player–team synchrony in professional association football. Human Movement Science, 32(4), 555–566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2013.01.011.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fajen, B. R. (2008). Perceptual learning and the visual control of braking. Perception & Psychophysics, 70(6), 1117–1129. https://doi.org/10.3758/PP.70.6.1117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fajen, B. R. (2021). Visual control of locomotion. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108870474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fajen, B. R., & Warren, W. H. (2003). Behavioral dynamics of steering, obstacle avoidance, and route selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 343–362.Google ScholarPubMed
Falandays, J. B., Yoshimi, J., Warren, W. H., & Spivey, M. J. (2023). A potential mechanism for Gibsonian resonance: Behavioral entrainment emerges from local homeostasis in an unsupervised reservoir network. Cognitive Neurodynamics, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11571-023-09988-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Favela, L. H. (2021). The dynamical renaissance in neuroscience. Synthese, 199, 2103–2127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernandez, L., & Bootsma, R. J. (2008). Non-linear gaining in precision aiming: Making Fitts’ task a bit easier. Acta Psychologica, 129(2), 217–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.06.001.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Field, D. T., & Wann, J. P. (2005). Perceiving time to collision activates the sensorimotor cortex. Current Biology, 15, 453–458.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Franchak, J. M., & Adolph, K. E. (2014). Gut estimates: Pregnant women adapt to changing possibilities for squeezing through doorways. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 76, 460–472. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-013-0578-y.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Franchak, J. M., Celano, E. C., & Adolph, K. E. (2012). Perception of passage through openings depends on the size of the body in motion. Experimental Brain Research, 223(2), 301–310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-012-3261-y.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fultot, M., Frazier, P. A., Turvey, M. T., & Carello, C. (2019). What are nervous systems for? Ecological Psychology, 31(3), 218–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Georgopoulos, A. P. (2007). A tribute to tau. In Pepping, G., & Grealy, M. A. (Eds.), Closing the gap: The scientific writings of David N. Lee (pp. 157–161). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Giblin, G., Farrow, D., Reid, M., Ball, K., & Abernethy, B. (2015). Exploring the kinaesthetic sensitivity of skilled performers for implementing movement instructions. Human Movement Science, 41, 76–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibson, E. J. (1963). Perceptual learning. Annual Review of Psychology, 14(1), 29–56. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.14.020163.000333.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibson, E. J. (1969). Principles of perceptual learning and development. Hoboken, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Gibson, E. J. (1991). An odyssey in learning and perception. Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
Gibson, E. J. (1994). Has psychology a future? Psychological Science, 5(2), 69–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1994.tb00633.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, E. J. (1997). An ecological psychologist’s prolegomena for perceptual development: A functional approach. In Dent-Read, C. & Zukow-Goldring, P. (Eds.), Evolving explanations of development: Ecological approaches to organism–environment systems. (pp. 23–45). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10265-001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, E. J. (2000). Perceptual learning in development: Some basic concepts. Ecological Psychology, 12(4), 295–302. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326969ECO1204_04.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, E. J. (2001). Perceiving the affordances: A portrait of two psychologists. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, E. J., & Pick, A. D. (2000). An ecological approach to perceptual learning and development. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, E. J., & Rader, N. (1979). Attention. In Hale, G. A. & Lewis, M. (Eds.), Attention and cognitive development (pp. 1–21). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-2985-5_1.Google Scholar
Gibson, E. J., & Walk, R. D. (1960). The “Visual Cliff.” Scientific American, 202(4), 64–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibson, E. J., & Walker, A. S. (1984). Development of knowledge of visual-tactual affordances of substance. Child Development, 55(2), 453–460.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibson, J. J. (1933). Adaptation, after-effect and contrast in the perception of curved lines. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 16, 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, J. J. (1950a). The perception of the visual world. Cambridge, MA: Riverside.Google Scholar
Gibson, J. J. (1950b). The implications of learning theory for social psychology. In Miller, J. G. (Ed.), Experiments in social process: A symposium on social psychology (pp. 149–167). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Gibson, J. J. (1960). The concept of the stimulus in psychology. American Psychologist, 15, 694–703. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0047037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, J. J. (1966). The senses considered as perceptual systems. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Gibson, J. J. (1967[1982]). Autobiography. In Reed, E. S. & Jones, R. (Eds.), Reasons for realism (pp. 7–22). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Gibson, J. J. (1970a[1982]). On theories for visual space perception. In Reed, E. S. & Jones, R. (Eds.), Reasons for realism (pp. 76–89). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Gibson, J. J. (1970b[1982]). A history of the ideas behind ecological optics: Introductory remarks on ecological optics. In Reed, E. S. & Jones, R. (Eds.), Reasons for realism (pp. 90–101). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Gibson, J. J. (1972[1982]). Unpublished material. In Reed, E. S. & Jones, R. (Eds.), Reasons for realism (pp. 348–349), Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Gibson, J. J. (1979[1982]). What is involved in surface perception? In Reed, E. S. & Jones, R. (Eds.), Reasons for realism (pp. 106–112), Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Gibson, J. J. (1979[2015]). The ecological approach to visual perception. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Gibson, J. J., & Crooks, L. E. (1938). A theoretical field-analysis of automobile-driving. American Journal of Psychology, 51(3), 453. https://doi.org/10.2307/1416145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, J. J., & Gibson, E. J. (1955). Perceptual learning: Differentiation or enrichment? Psychological Review, 62, 32–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibson, J. J., & Waddell, D. (1952). Homogeneous retinal stimulation and visual perception. American Journal of Psychology, 65(2), 263–270. https://doi.org/10.2307/1418360.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gray, R. (2021). How we learn to move: A revolution in the way we coach and practice sports skills. Perception and Action Consulting & Education, LLC.Google Scholar
Haken, H., Kelso, J. A. S., & Bunz, H. (1985). A theoretical model of phase transitions in human hand movements. Biological Cybernetics, 51, 347–356.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hasson, U., Nastase, S. A., & Goldstein, A. (2020). Direct fit to nature: An evolutionary perspective on biological and artificial neural networks. Neuron, 105(3), 416–434.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heft, H. (1989). Affordances and the body: An intentional analysis of Gibson’s ecological approach to visual perception. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 19(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.1989.tb00133.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heft, H. (2001). Ecological psychology in context: James Gibson, Roger Barker, and the legacy of William James’s radical empiricism. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heft, H. (2003). Affordances, dynamic experience, and the challenge of reification. Ecological Psychology, 15(2), 149–180. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326969ECO1502_4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heft, H. (2017). Perceptual information of “an entirely different order”: The “cultural environment” in The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems. Ecological Psychology, 29(2), 122–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/10407413.2017.1297187.Google Scholar
Heft, H. (2018). Places: Widening the scope of an ecological approach to perception–action with an emphasis on child development. Ecological Psychology, 30(1), 99–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heft, H. (2019). Revisiting “The discovery of the occluding edge and its implications for perception” 40 years on. In Wagman, J. B. & Blau, J. J. C. (Eds.), Perception as information detection: Reflections on Gibson’s ecological approach to visual perception (pp. 151–173). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Heft, H. (2020). Ecological psychology as social psychology? Theory & Psychology, 30(6), 813–826. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354320934545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heft, H., Hoch, J., Edmunds, T., & Weeks, J. (2014). Can the identity of a behavior setting be perceived through patterns of joint action? An investigation of place perception. Behavioral Sciences, 4(4), 371–393. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs4040371.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heras-Escribano, M. (2019). The philosophy of affordances. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, S. C. (2017). Toward conceptualizing race and racial identity development within an attractor landscape. SAGE Open, 7(3), https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244017719310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodges, B. H., & Baron, R. M. (2007). On making social psychology more ecological and ecological psychology more social. Ecological Psychology, 19(2), 79–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/10407410701331918.Google Scholar
Hodges, B. H., & Rączaszek-Leonardi, J. (2022). Ecological values theory: Beyond conformity, goal-seeking, and rule-following in action and interaction. Review of General Psychology, 26(1), 86–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/10892680211048174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hohwy, J. (2013). The predictive mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holden, J. G., Riley, M., Gao, J., & Torre, K. (2013). Fractal analyses: Statistical and methodological innovations and best practices. Frontiers in Physiology. http://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2013.00097.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holt, E. B. (1915a). Response and cognition I: The specific response relation. Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods, 12, 365–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holt, E. B. (1915b). The Freudian wish and its place in ethics. New York: H. Holt.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, C. L. (1943). Principles of behavior: An introduction to behavior theory. New York: Appleton.Google Scholar
Jacobs, D. M., & Michaels, C. F. (2007). Direct learning. Ecological Psychology, 19(4), 321–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology (Vols. 1 & 2). New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Johansson, G. (1973). Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Perception & Psychophysics, 14(2), 201–211. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kayed, N. S., Farstad, H., & Van der Meer, A. L. H. (2008). Preterm infants’ timing strategies to optical collisions. Early Human Development, 84, 381–388.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Käufer, S., & Chemero, A. (2015). Phenomenology: An introduction. Malden, MA: Polity.Google Scholar
Kelso, J. A. S. (1995). Dynamic patterns. Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
Kiefer, A. W., Kushner, A. M., Groene, J., Williams, C., Riley, M. A., & Myer, G. D. (2015). A commentary on real-time biofeedback to augment neuromuscular training for ACL injury prevention in adolescent athletes. Journal of Sports Science & Medicine, 14(1), 1.Google ScholarPubMed
Kinsella-Shaw, J. M., Shaw, B., & Turvey, M. T. (1992). Perceiving “walk-on-able” Slopes. Ecological Psychology, 4(4), 223–239. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326969eco0404_2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koffka, K. (1935). Principles of Gestalt psychology. San Diego, CA: Harcourt, Brace.Google Scholar
Konczak, J., Meeuwsen, H. J., & Cress, M. E. (1992). Changing affordances in stair climbing: The perception of maximum climbability in young and older adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18(3), 691–697. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.18.3.691.Google ScholarPubMed
Kono, T. (2009). Social affordances and the possibility of ecological linguistics. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 43(4), 356–373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-009-9097-8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kretch, K. S., & Adolph, K. E. (2013). Cliff or step? Posture-specific learning at the edge of a drop-off. Child development, 84(1), 226–240. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01842.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kugler, P. N., & Turvey, M. T. (1987). Information, natural law, and the self-assembly of rhythmic movement. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
van de Langenberg, R., Kingma, I., & Beek, P. J. (2007). Perception of limb orientation in the vertical plane depends on center of mass rather than inertial eigenvectors. Experimental Brain Research, 180, 595–607.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, D. N. (2009). General tau theory: Evolution to date. Perception, 38, 837–858.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, D. N., Lishman, J. R., & Thomson, J. A. (1982). Regulation of gait in long jumping. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8(3), 448–459.Google Scholar
Lee, D., Port, N. L., Kruse, W., & Georgopoulos, A. P. (2001). Neuronal clusters in the primate motor cortex during interceptin of moving targets. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13, 319–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, D. N., & Reddish, P. E. (1981). Plummeting gannets: A paradigm of ecological optics. Nature 293, 293–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Y., Lee, S., Carello, C., & Turvey, M. T. (2012). An archer’s perceived form scales the “hitableness” of archery targets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38(5), 1125–1131. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029036.Google ScholarPubMed
Lewin, L. (1931). The conflict between Aristotelian and Galileian modes of thought in contemporary psychology. Journal of General Psychology, 5(2), 141–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lobo, L., Nordbeck, P. C., Raja, V., et al. (2019). Route selection and obstacle avoidance with a short-range haptic sensory substitution device. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2019.03.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lobo, L., Travieso, D., Barrientos, A., & Jacobs, D. M. (2014). Stepping on obstacles with a sensory substitution device on the lower leg: Practice without vision is more beneficial than practice with vision. PLOS ONE, 9(6), e98801. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098801.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mace, W. (1977). James J. Gibson’s strategy for perceiving: Ask not what’s inside your head, but what’s your head inside of. In Shaw, R. & Bransford, J. (Eds.), Perceiving, acting, and knowing: Toward an ecological psychology (pp. 43–65). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Madruga-Parera, M., Bishop, C., Fort-Vanmeerhaeghe, A., Beato, M., Gonzalo-Skok, O., Romero-Rodríguez, D. (2022). Effects of 8 weeks of isoinertial vs. cable-resistance training on motor skills performance and interlimb asymmetries. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 36(5), 1200–1208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marr, D. (1982). Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information. Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
Marsh, K. L., Johnston, L., Richardson, M. J., & Schmidt, R. C. (2009). Toward a radically embodied, embedded social psychology. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39(7), 1217–1225. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsh, K. L., Richardson, M. J., Baron, R. M., & Schmidt, R. C. (2006). Contrasting approaches to perceiving and acting with others. Ecological Psychology, 18(1), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326969eco1801_1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthis, J. S., Muller, K. S., Bonnen, K. L., & Hayhoe, M. M. (2022) Retinal optic flow during natural locomotion. PLoS ONE Computational Biology, 18(2), e1009575. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009575.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McArthur, L. Z., & Baron, R. M. (1983). Toward an ecological theory of social perception. Psychological Review, 90(3), 215–238. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.90.3.215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Meer, A. L. H., Svantesson, M., & van der Weel, F. R. (2012). Longitudinal study of looming in infants with high-density EEG. Developmental Neuroscience, 34(6), 488–501. https://doi.org/10.1159/000345154.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van der Meer, A. L. H., & van der Weel, F. R. (2019). The optical information for self-perception in development. In Wagman, J. & Blau, J. (Eds.), Perception as information detection (pp. 110–129). New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Meer, A. L. H., van der Weel, F. R., & Lee, D. N. (1994). Prospective control in catching by infants. Perception, 23(3), 287–302. https://doi.org/10.1068/p230287.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Merchant, H., Battaglia-Mayer, A., & Georgopoulos, A. P. (2003a). Interception of real and apparent motion targets: Psychophysics in humans and monkeys. Experimental Brain Research, 152, 106–112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Merchant, H., Battaglia-Mayer, A., & Georgopoulos, A. P. (2003b). Functional organization of parietal neuronal responses to optic-flow stimuli. Journal of Neurophysiology, 90, 675–682.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Merchant, H., Battaglia-Mayer, A., & Georgopoulos, A. P. (2004). Neural responses during interception of real and apparent circularly moving stimuli in motor cortex and area 7a. Cerebral Cortex, 14, 314–331.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Merchant, H., & Georgopoulos, A. P. (2006). Neurophysiology of perceptual and motor aspects of interception. Journal of Neurophysiology, 95, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Michaels, C. F., & Carello, C. (1981). Direct perception. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Michotte, A. (1946). La perception de la causalité. Louvain: Études de Psychologie.Google Scholar
Nalepka, P., Kallen, R. W., Chemero, A., Saltzman, E., & Richardson, M. J. (2017). Herd those sheep: Emergent multiagent coordination and behavioral-mode switching. Psychological Science, 28(5), 630–650.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nalepka, P., Lamb, M., Kallen, R. W., Shockley, K., Chemero, A., Saltzman, E., et al. (2019). Human social motor solutions for human–machine interaction in dynamical task contexts. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science (PNAS), 116(4), 1437–1446.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Neisser, U. (1976). Cognition and reality: Principles and implications of cognitive psychology. New York: W. H. Freeman/Times Books/Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Newell, K., Liu, Y.-T., & Mayer-Kress, G. (2008). Landscapes beyond the HKB model. In Fuchs, A. & Jirsa, V. K. (Eds.), Coordination: Neural, behavioral and social dynamics (pp. 27–44). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newen, A., De Bruin, L., & Gallagher, S. (2018). The Oxford handbook of 4E cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Orden, G. C., Holden, J. G., & Turvey, M. T. (2003). Self-organization of cognitive performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132(3), 331–350.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Orden, G. C., Hollis, G., & Wallot, S. (2012). The blue-collar brain. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, art. 207.Google ScholarPubMed
Pagano, C. C., & Turvey, M. T. (1995). The inertia tensor as a basis for the perception of limb orientation. Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 21(5), 1070–1087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedersen, S., & Bang, J. (2016). Historicizing affordance theory: A rendezvous between ecological psychology and cultural-historical activity theory. Theory & Psychology, 26(6), 731–750. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354316669021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pezzulo, G., & Cisek, P. (2016). Navigating the affordance landscape: Feedback control as a process model of behavior and cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(6), 414–424.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pijpers, J. R., Oudejans, R. R. D., & Bakker, F. C. (2007). Changes in the perception of action possibilities while climbing to fatigue on a climbing wall. Journal of Sports Sciences, 25(1), 97–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410600630894.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pillai, A. S., & Jirsa, V. K. (2017). Symmetry breaking in space–time hierarchies shapes brain dynamics and behavior. Neuron, 94, 1010–1026.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pinder, R. A., Davids, K., Renshaw, I., & Araújo, D. (2011). Representative learning design and functionality of research and practice in sport. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 33(1), 146–155. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.33.1.146.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Port, N. L., Kruse, W., Lee, D., & Georgopoulos, A. P. (2001). Motor cortical activity duringinterception of moving targets. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13, 306–318. https://doi.org/10.1162/08989290151137368.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Port, R. (2003). Meter and speech. Journal of Phonetics, 31, 599–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rader, N. de V. (2018). Uniting Jimmy and Jackie: Foundation for a research program in developmental ecological psychology. Ecological Psychology, 30(2), 129–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/10407413.2018.1439110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramstead, M. J. D., Sakthivadivel, D. A. R., Heins, C., et al. (2023). On Bayesian mechanics: A physics of and by beliefs. Interface Focus, http://doi.org/10.1098/rsfs.2022.0029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raja, V. (2018). A theory of resonance: Toward an ecological cognitive architecture. Minds and Machines, 28(1), 29–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raja, V. (2019a). J. J. Gibson’s most radical idea: The development of a new law-based psychology. Theory & Psychology, 29(6), 789–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raja, V. (2019b). From metaphor to theory: The role of resonance in perceptual learning. Adaptive Behavior, 27(6), 405–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raja, V. (2021). Resonance and radical embodiment. Synthese, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02610-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raja, V., & Anderson, M. L. (2019). Radical embodied cognitive neuroscience. Ecological Psychology, 31(2), 166–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raja, V., & Anderson, M. L. (2021). Behavior considered as an enabling constraint. In Calzavarini, F. and Viola, M. (Eds.), Neural mechanisms: New challenges in the philosophy of neuroscience (pp. 209–232). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raja, V., Biener, Z., & Chemero, A. (2017). From Kepler to Gibson. Ecological Psychology, 29(2), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raja, V., Valluri, D., Baggs, E., Chemero, A., & Anderson, M. L. (2021). The Markov blanket trick: On the scope of the free energy principle and active inference. Physics of Life Reviews, 39, 49–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reed, E. S. (1988). James J. Gibson and the psychology of perception. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Reed, E. S. (1993). The intention to use a specific affordance: A conceptual framework for psychology. In: Wozniak, R. H. and Fischer, K. W. (Eds.), Development in context: Acting and thinking in specific environments (pp. 45–76), New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Reed, E. S. (1996). Encountering the world: Toward an ecological psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Reed, E. S., & Jones, R. (1982). Reasons for realism: Selected essays of James J. Gibson. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Regia-Corte, T., & Wagman, J. B. (2008). Perception of affordances for standing on an inclined surface depends on height of center of mass. Experimental Brain Research, 191(1), 25–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-008-1492-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, M. J., Marsh, K. L., & Baron, R. M. (2007). Judging and actualizing intrapersonal and interpersonal affordances. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perceptions & Performance, 33, 845–859.Google ScholarPubMed
Richardson, M. J., Marsh, K. L., Isenhower, R. W., Goodman, J. R. L., & Schmidt, R. C. (2007). Rocking together: Dynamics of intentional and unintentional interpersonal coordination. Human Movement Science, 26(6), 867–891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2007.07.002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rietveld, E., & Kiverstein, J. (2014). A rich landscape of affordances. Ecological Psychology, 26(4), 325–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/10407413.2014.958035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riley, M., & van Orden, G. C. (2005). Tutorials in contemporary nonlinear methods for the behavioral sciences. http://www.nsf.gov/sbe/bcs/pac/nmbs/nmbs.jsp.Google Scholar
Riley, M., Richardson, M., Shockley, K., & Ramenzoni, V. (2011). Interpersonal synergies. Frontiers in Psychology, 2. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00038.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rio, K. W., Dachner, G. C., & Warren, W. H. (2018). Local interactions underlying collective motion in human crowds. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2018.0611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Rugy, A., Taga, G., Montagne, G., Buekers, M. J., & Laurent, M. (2002). Perception–action coupling model for human locomotor pointing. Biological Cybernetics, 87, 141–150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ryan, K. J., & Gallagher, S. (2020). Between ecological psychology and enactivism: Is there resonance? Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savelsbergh, G. J. P., Williams, A. M., Kamp, J. V. D., & Ward, P. (2002). Visual search, anticipation and expertise in soccer goalkeepers. Journal of Sports Sciences, 20(3), 279–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/026404102317284826.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmidt, R., & Richardson, M. (2008). Dynamics of interpersonal coordination. In Fuchs, A. & Jirsa, V. K. (Eds.), Coordination: Neural, behavioral, and social dynamics (pp. 282–308). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Schneider, K., Zernicke, R. F., Schmidt, R. A., & Hart, T. J. (1989). Changes in limb dynamics during the practice of rapid arm movements. Journal of Biomechanics, 22(8–9), 805–817.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schögler, B., Pepping, G. J., & Lee, D. N. (2008). TauG-guidance of transients in expressive musical performance. Experimental Brain Research, 198: 361–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedgwick, H. A. (1973). The visible horizon: A potential source of visual information for the perception of size and distance. Doctoral Dissertation, Cornell University. Dissertation Abstracts International, 34, 1301B–1302B (University Microfilms No. 73‑22530).Google Scholar
Sedgwick, H. A. (2001). J. J. Gibson’s “ground theory of space perception.” i-Perception, 12(3), 1–55.Google Scholar
Segundo-Ortin, M. (2019). Toward a radical enactive cognitive science. University of Wollongong Thesis Collection 2017. https://ro.uow.edu.au/theses1/691.Google Scholar
Segundo-Ortin, M. (2020). Agency from a radical embodied standpoint: An ecological-enactive proposal. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01319.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Segundo-Ortin, M. (2022). Socio-cultural norms in ecological psychology: The education of intention. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-022-09807-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segundo-Ortin, M., & Heras-Escribano, M. (2021). Neither mindful nor mindless, but minded: Habits, ecological psychology, and skilled performance. Synthese. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-021-03238-w.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segundo-Ortin, M., & Heras-Escribano, M. (2023). The risk of trivializing affordances: Mental and cognitive affordances examined. Philosophical Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2023.2228341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segundo-Ortin, M., Heras-Escribano, M., & Raja, V. (2019). Ecological psychology is radical enough: A reply to radical enactivists. Philosophical Psychology, 32(7), 1001–1023. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2019.1668238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segundo-Ortin, M., & Kalis, A. (2022). Intentions in ecological psychology: An Anscombean proposal. Review of Philosophy and Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-022-00661-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segundo-Ortin, M., & Satne, G. (2022). Sharing attention, sharing affordances: From dyadic interaction to collective information. In Wehrle, M., D’Angelo, D., & Solomonova, E. (Eds.), Access and Mediation (pp. 91–112). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110647242-005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shockley, K., Carello, C., & Turvey, M. T. (2004). Metamers in the haptic perception of heaviness and moveableness. Perception & Psychophysics, 66(5), 731–742. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194968.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silva, P., Keifer, A., Riley, M. A., & Chemero, A. (2019). Trading perception and action for complex cognition: Application of theoretical principles from ecological psychology to the design of interventions for skill learning. In Cappuccio, M. (Ed.), Handbook of embodied cognition and sport psychology (pp. 47–74), Cambridge, MA: MIT.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snow, J. C., & Culham, J. C. (2022). The treachery of images: How realism influences brain and behavior. Trends in Cognitive Science, 25(6), 506–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solomon, H. Y., & Turvey, M. T. (1988). Haptically perceiving the distances reachable with hand-held objects. Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 14 3, 404–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stadler, M., & Kruse, P. (1990). The self-organization perspective in cognition research: Historical remarks and new experimental approaches. In Haken, H. and Stadler, M. (Eds.), Synergetics of Cognition (pp. 32–52). Berlin: Springer Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoffregen, T. A. (2003). Affordances as properties of the animal-environment system. Ecological Psychology, 15(2), 115–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoffregen, T., Yang, C.-M., Giveans, M., Flanagan, M., & Bardy, B. (2009). Movement in the perception of an affordance for wheelchair locomotion. Ecological Psychology, 21, 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/10407410802626001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strogatz, S. H. (1994). Nonlinear dynamics and chaos. Reading, MA: Perseus.Google Scholar
Sun, H., & Frost, B. J. (1998). Computation of different optical variables of looming objects in pigeon nucleus rotundus neurons. Nature Neuroscience, 1, 296–303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swanson, L. W. (2015). Neuroanatomical terminology: A lexicon of classical origins and historical foundations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Szokolszky, A. (2003). An interview with Eleanor Gibson. Ecological Psychology, 15(4), 271–281. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326969eco1504_2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tan, H.-R. M., Leuthold, A. C., Lee, D. N., Lynch, J. K., & Georgopoulos, A. P. (2009). Neural mechanisms of movement speed and tau as revealed by magnetoencephalography. Experimental Brain Research, 195, 541–552.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomas, B. J., Jeffrey, B., Riley, M. A., & Wagman, J. B. (2019). Information and its detection: The consequences of Gibson’s Theory of information pickup. In Wagman, J. & Blau, J. (Eds.), Perception as information detection (pp. 237–251). New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Titchener, E. B. (1898). The postulates of a structural psychology. Philosophical Review, 7(5), 449–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tognoli, E., & Kelso, J. A. S. (2014). The metastable brain. Neuron, 81, 35–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tognoli, E., Zhang, M., Fuchs, A., Beetle, C., & Kelso, J. A. S. (2020). Coordination dynamics: A foundation for understanding social behavior. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. http://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.00317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Travassos, B., Araújo, D., Davids, K., Vilar, L., Esteves, P., & Vanda, C. (2012). Informational constraints shape emergent functional behaviours during performance of interceptive actions in team sports. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 13(2), 216–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2011.11.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsao, T., & Tsao, D. Y. (2022). A topological solution to object segmentation and tracking. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science (PNAS), 119, e2204248119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2204248119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turvey, M. T. (1992). Affordances and prospective control: An outline of the ontology. Ecological Psychology, 4(3), 173–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turvey, M. T. (2019). Lectures on perception: An ecological approach. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Turvey, M. T., & Fonseca, S. (2014). The medium of haptic perception: A tensegrity hypothesis. Journal of Motor Behavior, 46(3), 143–187.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turvey, M. T., Shaw, R., Reed, E. S., & Mace, W. (1981). Ecological laws for perceiving and acting: A reply to Fodor and Pylyshyn. Cognition, 10, 237–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Weel, F. R., Sokolovskis, I., Raja, V., & van der Meer, A. L. H. (2022). Neural aspects of prospective control through resonating taus in an interceptive timing task. Brain Sciences, 12(12), 1737. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12121737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varoqui, D., Froger, J., Pélissier, J.-Y., & Bardy, B. G. (2011). Effect of coordination biofeedback on (re)learning preferred postural patterns in post-stroke patients. Motor Control, 15(2), 187–205. https://doi.org/10.1123/mcj.15.2.187.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vaughan, J., Mallett, C. J., Potrac, P., López-Felip, M. A., & Davids, K. (2021). Football, culture, skill development and sport coaching: Extending ecological approaches in athlete development using the skilled intentionality framework. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 635420. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.635420.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vauclin, P., Wheat, J., Wagman, J. B., & Seifert, L. (2023). A systematic review of perception of affordances for the person-plus-object system. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-023-02319-w.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venkatraman, V., Lee, J., & Schwarz, C. (2016). Steer or brake? Modeling drivers’ collision avoidance behavior using perceptual cues. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 16–6657. https://doi.org/10.3141/2602-12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vilhelmsen, K., Agyei, S. B., van der Weel, F. R. (Ruud), & van der Meer, A. L. H. (2019). A high‐density EEG study of differentiation between two speeds and directions of simulated optic flow in adults and infants. Psychophysiology, 56(1), e13281. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagemans, J., Elder, J. H., Kubovy, M., et al. (2012). A century of Gestalt psychology in visual perception: I. Perceptual grouping and figure-ground organization. Psychological Bulletin, 138(6), 1172–1217.Google ScholarPubMed
Wagman, J. B. (2019). A guided tour of Gibson’s theory of affordances. In Wagman, J. & Blau, J. (Eds.), Perception as information detection (pp. 130–148). New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagman, J. B., Lozano, S., Jiménez, A. A., Covarrubias, P., & Cabrera, F. (2019). Perception of affordances in the animal kingdom and beyond. In Riveros, I. Z., González, F. Cabrera, Candia, J. A. Camacho, & Gutiérrez, E. C. (Eds.), Aproximaciones al estudio del comportamiento y sus aplicaciones (Volumen II) (pp. 70–108), Ocotlán, Jalisco: Universidad de Guadalajara.Google Scholar
Wagman, J. B., Shockley, K., Riley, M. A., & Turvey, M. T. (2001). Attunement, calibration, and exploration in fast haptic perceptual learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 33, 323–327.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wagman, J. B., & Taylor, K. R. (2005). Perceiving affordances for aperture crossing for the person-plus-object system. Ecological Psychology, 17(2), 105–130. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326969eco1702_3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walton, A. E., Richardson, M. J., Langland-Hassan, P., & Chemero, A. (2015). Improvisation and the self-organization of multiple musical bodies. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(6).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, Y., & Frost, B. J. (1992). Time to collision is signalled by neurons in the nucleus rotundus of pigeons. Nature, 356, 236–238.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warren, W. H. (1984). Perceiving affordances: Visual guidance of stair climbing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10(5), 683–703. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.10.5.683.Google ScholarPubMed
Warren, W. H. (1998). Visually controlled locomotion: 40 years later. Ecological Psychology, 10(3–4), 177–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, W. H. (2006). The dynamics of perception and action. Psychological Review, 113(2), 358–389.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warren, W. H. (2018). Collective motion in human crowds. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27(4), 232–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417746743.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warren, W. H. (2019). Perceiving surface layout: Ground theory, affordances, and the objects of perception. In Wagman, J. & Blau, J. (Eds.), Perception as information detection (pp. 151–173). New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, W. H. (2021). Information is where you find it: Perception as an ecologically well-posed problem. I-Perception, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/20416695211000366.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warren, W. H., & Whang, S. (1987). Visual guidance of walking through apertures: Body-scaled information for affordances. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 371–383. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.13.3.371.Google ScholarPubMed
van der Weel, F. R., & van der Meer, A. L. H., (2009). Seeing it coming: Infants’ brain responses to looming danger. Naturwissenschaften, 96, 1385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-009-0585-y.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, A. D., Bingham, G. P. (2008). Identifying the information for the visual perception of relative phase. Perception & Psychophysics, 70, 465–476.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Wit, M. M., de Vries, S., van der Kamp, J., & Withagen, R. (2017). Affordances and neuroscience: Steps toward a successful marriage. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 80, 622–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Withagen, R., Araújo, D., & de Poel, H. J. (2017). Inviting affordances and agency. New Ideas in Psychology, 45, 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2016.12.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Withagen, R., & Chemero, A. (2009). Naturalizing perception: Developing the Gibsonian approach to perception along evolutionary lines. Theory & Psychology, 19(3), 363–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Withagen, R., de Poel, H. J., Araújo, D., & Pepping, G.-J. (2012). Affordances can invite behavior: Reconsidering the relationship between affordances and agency. New Ideas in Psychology, 30(2), 250–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2011.12.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woods, C. T., McKeown, I., Rothwell, M., Araújo, D., Robertson, S., & Davids, K. (2020). Sport practitioners as sport ecology designers: How ecological dynamics has progressively changed perceptions of skill scquisition in the sporting habitat. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00654.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save element to Kindle

To save this element to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Ecological Psychology
Available formats
×

Save element to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Ecological Psychology
Available formats
×

Save element to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Ecological Psychology
Available formats
×