Agassiz, Louis (1962). Essay on classification. Reprint of 1859 edition. Edited by Lurie, Edward. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Alberch, Pere (1982). “Developmental constraints in evolutionary processes.” In Evolution and development. Edited by Bonner, John Tyler. New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 313–332
Alberch, Pere (1989). “The logic of monsters: Evidence for internal constraint in development and evolution,” Geobios, mémoire spécial no. 12: 21–57
Allen, Garland E. (1966). “Thomas Hunt Morgan and the problem of sex determination, 1903–1910,” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 110: 53
Allen, Garland E. (1978a). Life sciences in the twentieth century. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press
Allen, Garland E. (1978b). Thomas Hunt Morgan: The man and his science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
Allen, Garland E. (1985). “T. H. Morgan and the split between embryology and genetics, 1910–35.” In A history of embryology. Edited by Horder, T. J., Witkowski, J. A., and Wylie, C. C.. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, pp. 113–146
Amundson, Ron (1983). “E. C. Tolman and the intervening variable: A study in the epistemological history of psychology,” Philosophy of Science 50: 268–282
Amundson, Ron (1985). “Psychology and epistemology: The place versus response controversy,” Cognition 20: 127–153
Amundson, Ron (1986). “The unknown epistemology of E. C. Tolman,” British Journal of Psychology 77: 525–531
Amundson, Ron (1989). “The trials and tribulations of selectionist explanations.” In Issues in evolutionary epistemology. Edited by Hahlweg, K. and Hooker, C. A.. New York: State University of New York Press, pp. 413–432
Amundson, Ron (1994). “Two concepts of constraint: Adaptationism and the challenge from developmental biology,” Philosophy of Science 61: 556–578
Amundson, Ron (1996). “Historical development of the concept of adaptation.” In Adaptation. Edited by Rose, Michael and Lauder, George V.. New York: Academic Press, pp. 11–53
Amundson, Ron (2000). “Embryology and evolution 1920–1960: Worlds apart?,” History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 22: 335–352
Amundson, Ron (2003). “Phylogenetic reconstruction then and now,” Biology and Philosophy 17: 679–694
Amundson, Ron (forthcoming). “Functions of myth: Essentialism as the foe of twentieth-century evolution theory,” Journal of the History of Biology
Appel, Toby A. (1987). The Cuvier–Geoffroy debate: French biology in the decades before Darwin. New York: Oxford University Press
Aquinas, Thomas (1952). Summa theologica. Chicago: Encyclopedia Brittanica
Arthur, Wallace (1997). The origin of animal body plans: A study in evolutionary developmental biology. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press
Arthur, Wallace (2001). “Developmental drive: An important determinant of the direction of phenotypic evolution,” Evolution and Development 3: 271–278
Asma, Stephen T. (1996). Following form and function: A philosophical archaelogy of life science. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press
Atran, Scott (1990). Cognitive foundations of natural history. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press
Bacon, Francis (1960). The new organon and related writings. New York: Bobbs-Merrill
Barrett, Paul H., Gautrey, Peter J., Herbert, Sandra, Kohn, David, and Smith, Sydney (1987). Charles Darwin's notebooks, 1836–1844. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press
Barry, Martin (1837a). “On the unity of structure in the animal kingdom,” The Edinburgh New Philosophical Journal 22 (January): 116–141
Barry, Martin (1837b). “Further observations on the unity of structure,” The Edinburgh New Philosophical Journal 22 (April): 345–364
Bateson, William (1922). “Evolutionary faith and modern doubts,” Science 55: 55–61
Beatty, John (1985). “Speaking of species: Darwin's strategy,” In The Darwinian heritage. Editing by Kohn, David. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 265–281
Beatty, John (1986). “The Synthesis and the synthetic theory.” In Integrating scientific disciplines. Edited by Bechtel, William. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, pp. 125–135
Beatty, John (1994). “The proximate/ultimate distinction in the multiple careers of Ernst Mayr,” Biology and Philosophy 9: 333–356
Bechtel, William (1986). Integrating scientific disciplines. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff
Bell, Sir Charles (1833). The hand: Its mechanism and vital endowments as evincing design. London: William Pickering
Bentham, Jeremy (1969). A Bentham reader. New York: Pegasus
Beurton, Peter, Falk, Raphael, and Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg (2000). The concept of the gene in development and evolution. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press
Bolker, Jessica A. (2001). “Evolutionary developmental biology: Developmental and genetic mechanisms of evolutionary change.” In Encyclopedia of the life sciences. New York: Macmillan. www.els.net [doi: 10.1038/npg.els.0001517]
Bowler, Peter J. (1977). “Darwinism and the argument from design: Suggestions for a reevaluation,” Journal of the History of Biology 10: 29–43
Bowler, Peter J. (1983). The eclipse of Darwinism. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press
Bowler, Peter J. (1984). Evolution: The history of an idea. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press
Bowler, Peter J. (1988). The non-Darwinian revolution. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press
Bowler, Peter J. (1996). Life's splendid drama. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Bowler, Peter J. (1999). “Evolution: History.” In Encyclopedia of the life sciences. New York: Macmillan. www.els.net [doi: 10.1038/npg.els.0001517]
Boyd, Richard (1991). “Realism, anti-foundationalism and the enthusiasm for natural kinds,” Philosophical Studies 61: 127–148
Boyd, Richard (1999). “Homeostasis, species, and higher taxa.” In Species: new interdisciplinary essays. Edited by Wilson, Robert A.. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 141–186
Brandon, Robert N. (1990). Adaptation and environment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
Bromberger, Sylvan (1966). “Why-questions.” In Mind and cosmos. Edited by Colodny, R. G.. Pittsburgh, PA: Pittburgh University Press, pp. 86–108
Brook, Andrew (1994). Kant and the mind. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press
Brower, Andrew V. Z. (2000). “Homology and the inference of systematic relationships: Some historical and philosophical perspectives.” In Homology and systematics. Edited by Scotland, R. and Pennington, R. T.. London: Taylor & Francis, pp. 10–21
Brush, Stephen G. (2002). “How theories become knowledge: Morgan's chromosome theory of heredity in America and Britain,” Journal of the History of Biology 35: 471–535
Buckland, William (1836). Geology and mineralogy considered with reference to natural theology, 2 vols. London: William Pickering
Budd, Graham (1999). “Does evolution in body patterning genes drive morphological change – or vice versa?,” Bioessays 21: 326–332
Burian, Richard M. (1988). “Challenges to the Evolutionary Synthesis,” Evolutionary Biology 23: 247–269
Burian, Richard M. (1997). “On conflicts between developmental and genetic viewpoints – and their attempted resolution in molecular biology.” In Structures and norms in science. Edited by Chiera, M. L. Dalla. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 243–264
Burian, Richard M. (2005). “Lillie's Paradox – or, some hazards of cellular geography.” In The epistemology of development, evolution, and genetics. Edited by Burian, Richard M.. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, pp. 183–209
Burian, Richard M., Jean Gayon, and Doris T. Zallen (1991). “Boris Ephrussi and the synthesis of genetics and embryology.” In A conceptual history of modern embryology. Edited by Gilbert, Scott F.. New York: Plenum Press, pp. 207–227
Burkhardt, Frederick, and Smith, Sydney (1986). Correspondence of Charles Darwin. Vol. 2. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press
Buss, Leo (1987). The evolution of individuality. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
Cain, Arthur J. (1958). “Logic and memory in Linnaeus's system of taxonomy,” Proceedings of the Linnean Society of London 169: 144–163
Camardi, Giovanni (2001). “Richard Owen, morphology, and evolution,” Journal of the History of Biology 34: 481–515
Cannon, S. F. (1978). Science in culture: The early Victorian period. Vol. 2. New York: Dawson and Science History
Carpenter, William B. (1838). “Review of Whewell, ‘A history of the inductive sciences,’” British and Foreign Medical Review 5: 319–342
Carpenter, William B. (1889). Nature and man: Essays scientific and philosophical. New York: D. Appleton
Carroll, Sean B. (2000). “Homeotic genes and the evolution of arthropods and chordates.” In Shaking the tree: Readings from nature in the history of life. Edited by Gee, Henry. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 69–88
Carroll, Sean B. (2001). “The big picture,” Nature 409: 669
Carroll, Sean B., Grenier, Jennifer K., and Weatherbee, Scott D. (2001). From DNA to diversity. Malden, MA: Blackwell Science
Chambers, Robert (1844). Vestiges of the natural history of creation. London: Churchill
Chung, Carl (2003). “On the origin of the typological/population distinction in Ernst Mayr's changing views of species, 1942–1959,” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 34C: 277–296
Churchill, Frederick B. (1974). “William Johannsen and the genotype concept,” Journal of the History of Biology 7: 5–30
Churchill, Frederick B. (1980). “The modern evolutionary synthesis and the biogenetic law.” In The evolutionary synthesis. Edited by Mayr, Ernst and Provine, William. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 112–122
Coleman, William (1964). Georges Cuvier, zoologist. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Coleman, William (1976). “Morphology between type concept and descent theory,” Journal of the History of Medicine 31: 149–175
Coleman, William (1980). “Morphology in the evolutionary synthesis.” In The evolutionary synthesis. Edited by Ernst, Mayr and Provine, William. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 174–180
Conklin, Edwin G. (1908). “The mechanism of heredity,” Science 27: 89–99
Crombie, A. C. (1994). Styles of scientific thinking in the European tradition. 4 vols. London: Duckworth
Dana, James Dwight (1857). “Thoughts on species,” Annals and Magazine of Natural History 20: 485–497
Darwin, Charles (1859). On the origin of species. London: John Murray
Darwin, Charles (1909). The foundations of the origin of species: Two essays written in 1842 and 1844 by Charles Darwin. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press
Davis, D. Dwight (1949). “Comparative anatomy and the evolution of vertebrates.” In Genetics, paleontology and evolution. Edited by Jepsen, Glenn L., Simpson, George Gaylord, and Mayr., ErnstPrinceton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 64–87
De Beer, Gavin R. (1938). “Embryology and evolution.” In Evolution: essays on aspects of evolutionary biology presented to Professor E. S. Goodrich on his seventieth birthday. Edited by Beer, Gavin R.. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press, pp. 57–78
Beer, Gavin R. (1951). Embryos and ancestors. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press
Beer, Gavin R. (1971). Homology, an unsolved problem. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press
Robertis, Eddy M., and Sasai, Yoshiki (1996). “A common plan for dorsoventral patterning in Bilateria,” Nature 380: 37–40
De Robertis, Eddy M., and Yoshiki Sasai (2000). “A common plan for dorsoventral patterning in Bilateria.” In Shaking the tree: Readings from nature in the history of life. Edited by Gee., HenryChicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 89–99
Desmond, Adrian (1989). The politics of evolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Di Gregorio, Mario A (1995). “A wolf in sheep's clothing: Carl Gegenbaur, Ernst Haeckel, the vertebral theory of the skull, and the survival of Richard Owen,” Journal of the History of Biology 28: 247–280
Dietrich, Michael R. (1995). “Richard Goldschmidt's ‘heresies’ and the Evolutionary Synthesis,” Journal of the History of Biology 28: 431–461
Dobzhansky, Theodosius (1937). Genetics and the origin of species. New York: Columbia University Press
Dobzhansky, Theodosius (1950). “Human diversity and adaptation,” Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology 15: 385–400
Dobzhansky, Theodosius (1951). Genetics and the origin of species. 3rd and revised New York: Columbia University Press
Dobzhansky, Theodosius (1955). Evolution, genetics, and man. New York: Wiley
Dobzhansky, Theodosius (1970). Genetics of the evolutionary process. New York: Columbia University Press
Eigen, Edward A. (1997). “Overcoming first impressions: George Cuvier's types,” Journal of the History of Biology 30: 179–209
Endler, John A. (1986). Natural selection in the wild. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
Endler, John A., and McLellan, Tracy (1988). “The processes of evolution: Towards a newer synthesis,” Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 19: 395–421
Ephrussi, Boris (1951). “Remarks on cell heredity.” In Genetics in the twentieth century. Edited by Dunn, L. C.. New York: Macmillan, pp. 241–262
Ephrussi, Boris (1953). Nucleo-cytoplasmic relations in micro-organisms. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press
Ereshefsky, Marc (2001). The poverty of the Linnean hierarchy. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press
Falk, Raphael (1997). “Muller on development,” Theory in Bioscience 116: 349–366
Falk, Raphael (2000). “The gene – a concept in tension.” In The concept of the gene in development and evolution. Edited by Beurton, Peter, Falk, Raphael, and Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, pp. 317–345
Falk, Raphael, and Schwartz, Sara (1993). “Morgan's hypothesis of the genetic control of development,” Genetics 134: 671–674
Farber, Paul L. (1976). “The type-concept in zoology during the first half of the nineteenth century,” Journal of the History of Biology 9: 93–119
Gayon, Jean (1989). “Critics and criticisms of the Modern Synthesis: The viewpoint of a philosopher,” Evolutionary Biology 26: 1–49
Gayon, Jean (1998). Darwinism's stuggle for survival. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press
Gayon, Jean (2000). “From measurement to organization: A philosophical scheme for the history of the concept of heredity.” In The concept of the gene in development and evolution. Edited by Beurton, Peter, Falk, Raphael, and Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, pp. 69–90
Gee, Henry (2000). Shaking the tree: Readings from nature in the history of life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Gegenbaur, Carl (1870). “Die Stellung und Bedeutung der Morphologie,” Gegenbaurs Morphologisches Jahrbuch 1: 1–19
Gerhardt, John, and Kirschner, Marc (1997). Cells, embryos, and evolution. Malden, MA: Blackwell
Ghiselin, Michael T. (1969). The triumph of the Darwinian method. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press
Ghiselin, Michael T. (1980). “The failure of morphology to assimilate Darwinism.” In The Evolutionary Synthesis. Edited by Mayr, Ernst and Provine, William. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 180–193
Ghiselin, Michael T. (1997). Metaphysics and the origin of species. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press
Ghiselin, Michael T. (2002). “An autobiographical anatomy,” History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 24: 285–291
Gilbert, Scott (2001). “Ecological developmental biology: Developmental biology meets the real world,” Developmental Biology 233: 1–12
Gilbert, Scott F. (1978). “The embryological origins of the gene theory,” Journal of the History of Biology 11: 307–351
Gilbert, Scott F. (1980). “Owen's Vertebral Archetype and evolutionary genetics – a Platonic appreciation,” Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 23: 475–488
Gilbert, Scott F. (1988). Developmental Biology. 2nd ed. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates
Gilbert, Scott F. (1991). “Induction and the origins of developmental genetics.” In A conceptual history of modern embryology. Edited by Gilbert, Scott F.. New York: Plenum Press, pp. 181–206
Gilbert, Scott F. (1996). “Enzymatic adaptation and the entrance of molecular biology into embryology.” In The philosophy and history of molecular biology: New perspectives. Edited by Sarkar, Sahotra. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, pp. 101–123
Gilbert, Scott F. (1998). “Bearing crosses: A historiography of genetics,” American Journal of Medical Genetics 76: 168–182
Gilbert, Scott F. (2000). “Genes classical and genes developmental: The different uses of genes in evolutionary syntheses.” In Concept of the gene in development and evolution: Historical and epistemological perspectives. Edited by Buerton, Peter, Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg, and Falk, Raphael. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, pp. 178–192
Gilbert, Scott F. (2003a). Developmental biology. 7th ed. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates
Gilbert, Scott F. (2003b). “Evo–devo, devo–evo, and devgen–popgen,” Biology and Philosophy 18: 347–352
Gilbert, Scott F., and Bolker, Jessica A. (2001). “Homologies of process and modular elements of embryolic construction,” Journal of Experimental Zoology (Molecular and Developmental Evolution) 291: 1–12
Gilbert, Scott F., and Marion Faber (1996). “Looking at embryos: The visual and conceptual aesthetics of emerging form.” In The elusive synthesis: Aesthetics and science. Edited by Tauber, A. I.. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, pp. 125–151
Gilbert, Scott F., Opitz, John M., and Raff, Rudolf A. (1996). “Resynthesizing evolutionary and developmental biology,” Developmental Biology 173: 357–372
Gillespie, Charles Coulston (1960). The edge of objectivity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
Gillespie, Neal C. (1987). “Natural order, natural theology, and social order: John Ray and the ‘Newtonian ideology,’” Journal of the History of Biology 20: 1–47
Glacken, Clarence J. (1967). Traces on the Rhodian shore. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press
Goldschmidt, Richard (1940). The material basis of evolution. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press
Gould, Stephen Jay (1977). Ontogeny and phylogeny. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Gould, Stephen Jay (1980). “G. G. Simpson, paleontology, and the Modern Synthesis.” In The Evolutionary Synthesis. Edited by Mayr, Ernst and Provine, William. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 153–172
Gould, Stephen Jay (1983). “The hardening of the modern synthesis.” In dimensions of Darwinism. Edited by Grene, Marjorie. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, pp. 71–93
Gould, Stephen Jay (2002). The structure of evolutionary theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Gould, Stephen Jay, and Lewontin, Richard C. (1979). “The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: A critique of the adaptationist programme,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B205: 581–598
Gould, Stephen Jay, and Vrba, Elizabeth S. (1982). “Exaptation – a missing term in the science of form,” Paleobiology 8: 4–15
Grene, John, and Ruse, Michael (1994). “Special issue on Ernst Mayr at ninety,” Biology and Philosophy 9 (3)
Griesemer, James R. (2000). “Reproduction and the reduction of genetics.” In Concept of the gene in development and evolution: Historical and epistemological perspectives. Edited by Buerton, Peter, Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg, and Falk, Raphael. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, pp. 240–285
Griesemer, James R., and William C. Wimsatt (1989). “Picturing Weismannism: A case study of conceptual evolution.” In What the philosophy of biology is. Edited by Ruse, Michael. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, pp. 75–137
Griffiths, Paul (1997). What emotions really are. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Guyer, Paul (1987). Kant and the claims of knowledge. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press
Hacking, Ian (1983). Representing and intervening. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press
Hall, Brian K. (1994). Homology: The hierarchical basis of comparative biology. San Diego, CA: Academic Press
Hall, Brian K. (1999a). Evolutionary developmental biology. 2nd ed. Dordrecht: Kluwer
Hall, Brian K. (1999b). Homology. Chichester, England: Wiley
Hall, Brian K. (2000). “Evo–devo or devo–evo – does it matter?,” Evolution and Development 2: 177–178
Hamburger, Viktor (1980). “Embryology and the Modern Synthesis in evolutionary theory.” In The Evolutionary Synthesis. Edited by Mayr, Ernst and Provine, William. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 97–112
Harrison, Ross G. (1937). “Embryology and its relations,” Science 85: 369–374
Hertwig, Oscar (1894). The biological problem of to-day: Preformation or epigenesis?New York: Macmillan
Hertwig, Paula (1934). “Probleme der heutigen Vererbungslehre,” Die Naturwissenschaften 25: 425–430
Hinchliffe, J. Richard (1989). “Reconstructing the archetype: Innovation and conservatism in the evolution and development of the pentadactyl limb.” In Complex organismal functions: Integration and evolution in vertebrates. Edited by Wake, David B. and Roth., G.Chichester, England: Wiley, pp. 171–189
Hodge, M. J. S. (1985). “Darwin as a lifelong generation theorist.” In The Darwinian heritage. Edited by Kohn, David. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 207–243
Holder, Nigel (1983). “Developmental constraints and the evolution of vertebrate digit patterns,” Journal of Theoretical Biology 104: 451–471
Holland, P. W. H. (1998). “Major transitions in animal evolution: A developmental genetic perspective,” American Zoologist 38: 829–842
Hopkins, William (1860). “Physical theories of the phenomenon of life,” Fraser's Magazine (June): 739–753
Horder, T. J. (1989). “Syllabus for an embryological synthesis.” In Complex organismal functions: Integration and evolution in vertebrates. Edited by Wake, David B. and Roth, G.. Chichester, England: Wiley, pp. 315–348
Horn, H. S., J. T. Bonner, W. Pohle, M. J. Katz, M. A. R. Koehl, H. Meinhardt, R. A. Raff, W.-E. Reif, S. C. Stearns, and R. Strathman (1982). “Adaptive aspects of development.” In Evolution and development. Edited by Bonner, John Tyler. New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 215–235
Hubby, J. L., and Lewontin, R. C. (1966). “A molecular approach to the study of genic heterozygosity in natural populations I. The number of alleles at different loci in Drosophila pseudoobscura,” Genetics 54: 577–594
Hull, David L. (1965). “The effect of essentialism on taxonomy: 2000 years of stasis,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 15, 16: 314–326, 1–18
Hull, David L. (1973). Darwin and his critics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Hull, David L. (1983). “Darwin and the nature of science.” In Evolution from molecules to men. Edited by Bendall, D. S.. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, pp. 63–80
Hull, David L. (1999). “Why did Darwin fail? The role of John Stuart Mill.” In Biology and epistemology. Edited by Creath, Richard and Maienschein, Jane. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, pp. 48–63
Hurlbutt, R. H. (1965). Hume, Newton, and the design argument. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press
Huxley, Julian (1940). The new systematics. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press
Huxley, Julian (1942). Evolution: The modern synthesis. New York: Harper and Brother
Huxley, Thomas Henry (1893a). “Evolution in biology.” In Collected essays vol. 2: Darwiniana. London: Macmillan, pp. 187–226
Huxley, Thomas Henry (1893b). “Lectures on evolution.” In Collected essays vol. 4: Science and Hebrew tradition. London: Macmillan, pp. 46–138
Huxley, Thomas Henry (1894). “Owen's position in the history of anatomical science.” In The life of Richard Owen, by his grandson. Vol. 2. Edited by Owen, Rev. Richard. London: John Murray 273–332
Jacob, François (1976). The logic of life. New York: Pantheon
Jacob, François, and Monod, Jacques (1961). “Genetic regulatory mechanisms in the synthesis of proteins,” Journal of Molecular Biology 3: 318–356
Jacobsen, A. G. (1966). “Inductive processes in embryonic development,” Science 152 (3718): 25–34
Jepsen, Glenn L., Mayr, Ernst, and Simpson, George Gaylord (1949). Genetics, Paleontology, and evolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
Johnston, Timothy D., and Gottlieb, Gilbert (1990). “Neophenogenesis: A developmental theory of phenotype evolution,” Journal of Theoretical Biology 147: 471–495
Keller, Evelyn Fox (2000a). Century of the gene. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Keller, Evelyn Fox (2000b). “Decoding the genetic program.” In The concept of the gene in development and evolution. Edited by Beurton, Peter, Falk, Raphael, and Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, pp. 159–177
Keyes, David N., Lewis, David L., Jane, E. Selegue, Bret, J. Pearson, Lisa, V. Goodrich, Ronald, L. Johnson, Julie, Gates, Matthew, P. Scott, and Sean, B. Carrol (1999). “Recruitment of a hedgehog regulatory circuit in butterfly eyespot evolution,” Science 283: 532–534
Kitcher, Patricia (1990). Kant's transcendental psychology. New York: Oxford University Press
Kohler, Robert E. (1993). “Subcultures in genetics,” Science 261: 1061–1062
Kohler, Robert E. (1994). Lords of the fly. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Lankester, E. Ray (1870). “On the use of the term homology in modern zoology, and the distinction between homogenetic and homoplastic agreements,” Annual Magazine of Natural History 6: 34–43
Lankester, E. Ray (1967). “Degeneration: A chapter in Darwinism.” In The intepretation of animal form. Edited by Coleman, William. New York: Johnson Reprint Corporation, pp. 57–132
Larson, James L. (1994). Interpreting nature: The science of living form from Linnaeus to Kant. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press
Laudan, Larry (1980). “Why was the logic of discovery abandoned?” In Scientific discovery: Logic and rationality. Edited by Nickles, Thomas. Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 173–183
Lenoir, Timothy (1982). The strategy of life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Lillie, Frank R. (1927). “The gene and the ontogenetic process,” Science 66: 361–368
Love, Alan C. (2003). “Evolutionary morphology, innovation, and the synthesis of evolutionary and developmental biology,” Biology and Philosophy 18: 309–345
Love, Alan C., and Raff, Rudolf A. (2003). “Knowing your ancestors: Themes in the history of evo–devo,” Evolution and Development 5: 327–330
Lovejoy, Arthur O. (1936). The great chain of being. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Lyell, Charles (1832). Principles of geology. 1st ed.London: John Murray
Lyell, Charles (1835). Principles of geology. 4th ed. London: John Murray
Lyons, Sherrie (1999). Thomas Henry Huxley: The evolution of a scientist. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books
M'Cosh, James, and Dickie, George (1855). Typical forms and special ends in creation. New York: Hurst & Company
Maienschein, Jane (1991a). “The origins of Entwicklungsmechanik.” In A conceptual history of modern embryology. Edited by Gilbert, Scott F.. New York: Plenum Press, pp. 43–61
Maienschein, Jane (1991b). Transforming traditions in American biology: 1880–1915. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press
Maienschein, Jane (1999). “Competing epistemologies and developmental biology.” In Biology and epistemology. Edited by Creath, Richard and Maienschein, Jane. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, pp. 122–137
Maynard Smith, John (1982). Evolution and the theory of games. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press
Maynard Smith, John, Richard, M. Burian, Stuart, A. Kauffman, Pere Alberch, J. Campbell, Brian, C. Goodwin, Lande, R., Raup, David M., and Wolpert, Lewis (1985). “Developmental constraints and evolution,” Quarterly Review of Biology 60: 265–287
Mayr, Ernst (1959a). “Concerning a new biography of Charles Darwin, and its scientific shortcomings: Review of Gertrude Himmelfarb, Darwin and the Darwinian Revolution,” Scientific American 201 (11): 209–216
Mayr, Ernst (1959b). “Darwin and the evolutionary theory in biology.” In Evolution and anthropology: A centennial appraisal. Edited by Meggers, B. J.. Washington, DC: Anthropological Society of Washington, pp. 1–10
Mayr, Ernst (1959c). “Where are we?,” Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology 24: 1–14
Mayr, Ernst (1961). “Cause and effect in biology,” Science 134: 1501–1506
Mayr, Ernst (1966). Animal species and evolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Mayr, Ernst (1970). Populations, species, and evolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Mayr, Ernst (1974). “Behavior programs and evolutionary strategies,” American Scientist 62: 650–659
Mayr, Ernst (1976). “Agassiz, Darwin, and evolution.” In Evolution and the diversity of life: Selected essays. Edited by Mayr, Ernst. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 251–276
Mayr, Ernst (1980a). “Prologue: Some thoughts on the history of the Evolutionary Synthesis.” In The Evolutionary Synthesis. Edited by Mayr, Ernst and Provine, William. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 1–48
Mayr, Ernst (1982). The growth of biological thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Mayr, Ernst (1984). “The triumph of the evolutionary synthesis,” Times Literary Supplement November 2, 1984: 1261–1262
Mayr, Ernst (1988). Toward a new philosophy of biology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Mayr, Ernst (1991). “An overview of current evolutionary biology.” In New perspectives on evolution. Edited by Warren, Leonard and Koprowski, Hilary. New York: Wiley Liss, pp. 1–14
Mayr, Ernst (1992). “Controversies in retrospect,” Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology 8: 1–34
Mayr, Ernst (1994a). “Recapitulation reinterpreted: The somatic program,” Quarterly Review of Biology 69: 223–232
Mayr, Ernst (1994b). “Reply to John Beatty,” Biology and Philosophy 9: 357–358
Mayr, Ernst and Provine, William (1980). The Evolutionary Synthesis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
McOuat, Gordon R. (1996). “Species, rules and meaning: The politics of language and the ends of definitions in 19th century natural history,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 27 (4): 473–519
Mivart, St. George (1871). On the genesis of species. New York: Appleton
Moore, James (1991). “Deconstructing Darwinism: The politics of evolution in the 1860s,” Journal of the History of Biology 24: 353–408
Morange, Michel (1998). A history of molecular biology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Morgan, Thomas Hunt (1910). “Chromosomes and heredity,” American Naturalist 44: 449–496
Morgan, Thomas Hunt (1919). The physical basis of heredity. Philadelphia: Lippincott
Morgan, Thomas Hunt (1926). The theory of the gene. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press
Morgan, Thomas Hunt (1932). “The rise of genetics,” Science 76: 261–267, 285–288
Morgan, Thomas Hunt, Sturtevant, A. H., Muller, H. J., and Bridges, C. B. (1915). The mechanism of Mendelian heredity. New York: Henry Holt
Multauf, Robert P. (1966). The origins of chemistry. London: Oldbourne
Müller, Fritz (1869). Facts and arguments for Darwin. London: John Murray
Müller-Wille, Staffan (1995). “Linnaeus concept of a “symmetry of all parts,” Jahrbuch für Geschichte und Theorie der Biologie 2: 41–47
Nyhart, Lynn (1995). Biology takes form. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Oken, Lorenz (1807). Über die Bedeutrung der Schadelknochen. Jena, Germany: Göpferdt
Olson, Everett C. (1960). “Morphology, paleontology, and evolution.” In Evolution after Darwin, vol. 1: The evolution of life. Edited by Tax, Sol. Chicago: Chicago University Press, pp. 523–545
Oppenheimer, Jane M. (1966). “The growth and development of developmental biology.” In Major problems in developmental biology. Edited by Locke, Michael. New York: Academic Press, pp. 1–27
Ospovat, Dov (1981). The development of Darwin's theory. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press
Owen, Richard (1843). Lectures on the comparative anatomy and physiology of the invertebrate animals. London: Longman Brown Green and Longmans
Owen, Richard (1848). The archetype and homologies of the vertebrate skeleton. London: J. van Voorst
Owen, Richard (1849). On the nature of limbs. London: J. van Voorst
Paley, William (1809). Natural theology. 12th ed. London: J. Faulder
Pearson, Karl (1892). Grammar of science. London: Walter Scott
Pinto-Correia, Clara (1997). The ovary of Eve. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Popper, Karl R. (1950). The open society and its enemies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
Poulton, Edward B. (1908). “What is a species?” In Essays on evolution. Edited by Poulton, Edward B.. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press, pp. 46–94
Provine, William (1971). The origins of theoretical population genetics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Provine, William (1980). “Epilogue.” In The Evolutionary Synthesis. Edited by Mayr, Ernst and Provine, William. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 399–411
Provine, William (1986). Sewall Wright and evolutionary biology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Provine, William (1988). “Progress in evolution and meaning in life.” In Evolutionary progress. Edited by Nitecki, Matthew H.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 49–74
Quine, Willard van Orman (1969). “Natural kinds.” In Ontological relativity and other essays. Edited by Quine, Willard van Orman. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 114–138
Raff, Rudolf, and Kaufmann, Thomas C. (1983). Embryos, genes, and evolution. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press
Raff, Rudolf A. (1996). The shape of life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Raven, Charles E. (1953). Science and religion. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press
Reeve, Hudson Kern, and Paul, W. Sherman (1993). “Adaptation and the goals of evolutionary research,” Quarterly Review of Biology 68: 1–32
Rehbock, Philip F. (1985). The philosophical naturalists. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press
Reif, Wolf-Ernst, Thomas, Junker, and Uwe, Hossfeld (2000). “The synthetic theory of evolution: General problems and the German contribution to the synthesis,” Theory in Biosciences 119: 41–91
Richards, Eveleen (1987). “A question of property rights: Richard Owen's evolutionism reassessed,” British Journal for the History of Science 20: 129–171
Richards, Robert J. (2002). The Romantic conception of life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Rienesl, J., and Gunter, P. Wagner (1992). “Constancy and change of basipodial variation patterns: A comparative study of crested and marbled newts – Triturus cristatus, Triturus marmoratus – and their natural hybrids,” Journal of Evolutionary Biology 5: 307–324
Robert, Jason Scott (2002). “How developmental is evolutionary developmental biology?,” Biology and Philosophy 17: 591–611
Roe, Shirley (1981). Matter, life, and generation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press
Roget, Peter Mark (1834). Animal and vegetable physiology considered with respect to natural theology. 2 vols.London: William Pickering
Roth, V. Louise (1984). “On homology,” Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 22: 13–29
Roth, V. Louise (1988). “The biological basis of homology.” In Ontogeny and systematics. Edited by Humphries, C. J.. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 1–26
Roux, Wilhelm (1986). “The problems, methods, and scope of developmental mechanics.” In Defining biology: Lectures from the 1890s. Edited by Maienschein, Jane. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 108–146
Rupke, Nicolaas A. (1993). “Richard Owen's vertebrate archetype,” ISIS 84: 231– 251
Rupke, Nikolaas A. (1994). Richard Owen: Victorian naturalist. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press
Ruse, Michael (1979). The Darwinian revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Ruse, Michael (1996). Monad to man: The concept of progress in evolutionary biology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Russell, Edwin S. (1916). Form and function. London: John Murray
Saha, Margaret (1991). “Spemann seen through a lens.” In A conceptual history of modern embryology. Edited by Gilbert, Scott F.. New York: Plenum Press, pp. 91–108
Sander, Klaus (1983). “The evolution of patterning mechanisms: Gleanings from insect embryogenesis and spermatogenesis.” In Development and evolution. Edited by Goodwin, Brian C., Holder, Nigel, and Wylie, C. C.. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, pp. 353–379
Sander, Klaus (1985). “The role of genes in ontogenesis: Evolving concepts from 1883 to 1983 as perceived by an insect embryologist.” In A history of embryology. Edited by Horder, T. J., Witkowski, J. A., and Wylie, C. C.. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, pp. 363–395
Sandler, Iris, and Laurence, Sandler (1985). “A conceptual ambiguity that contributed to the neglect of Mendel's paper,” History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 7: 3–70
Sapp, Jan (1987). Beyond the gene: Cytoplasmic inheritance and the struggle for authority in genetics. New York: Oxford University Press
Sapp, Jan (1990). “The nine lives of Gregor Mendel.” In Experimental inquiries. Edited by Grand, H. E.. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, pp. 137–166
Sarkar, Sahotra (1999). “From the Reactionsnorm to the adaptive norm: The norm of reaction, 1909–1960,” Biology and Philosophy 14: 235–252
Scharf, Sara (2003). “Contrasts along a continuum: Purposes and constraints in natural and artificial classifications in systematic biology, 1730s–1830s,” unpublished manuscript, University of Toronto
Schwartz, Sara (2000). “The differential concept of the gene.” In Concept of the gene in development and evolution: Historical and epistemological perspectives. Edited by Buerton, Peter, Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg, and Falk, Raphael. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, pp. 26–39
Schwenk, Kurt (1995). “A utilitarian approach to evolutionary constraint,” Zoology 98: 251–262
Shubin, Neil, Cliff, Tabin, and Sean, Carrol (1997). “Fossils, genes and the evolution of animal limbs,” Nature 388: 639–648
Shubin, Neil, Cliff Tabin, and Sean Carroll (2000). “Fossils, genes and the evolution of animal limbs.” In Shaking the tree: Readings from nature in the history of life. Edited by Gee, Henry. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 100–127
Shubin, Neil, David, B. Wake, and Andrew, J. Crawford (1995). “Morphological variation in the limbs of Taricha granulosa (Caudata: Salamandridae): Evolutionary and phylogenetic mechanisms,” Evolution 49: 874–884
Shubin, Neil H., and Pere, Alberch (1986). “A morphological approach to the origin and basic organization of the tetrapod limb,” Evolutionary Biology 20: 319–387
Sloan, Phillip R. (1992). “On the edge of evolution.” In The Hunterian lectures in comparative anatomy, May and June 1837. Edited by Owen, Richard. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 3–72
Sloan, Phillip R. (2002). “Preforming the categories: Eighteenth-century generation theory and the biological roots of Kant's a priori,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 40: 229–253
Sloan, Phillip R. (2003). “Whewell's philosophy of discovery and the Archetype of the vertebrate skeleton,” Annals of Science 60: 39–61
Smith, W. C., and Harland, R. M. (1992). “Expression cloning of noggin, a new dorsalizing factor localized to the Spemann organizer in Xenopus embryos,” Cell 70: 829–840
Smocovitis, Vassiliki Betty (1992). “Unifying biology: The Evolutionary Synthesis and modern biology,” Journal of the History of Biology 25: 1–65
Smocovitis, Vassiliki Betty (1996). Unifying biology: The Evolutionary Synthesis and modern biology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
Smocovitis, Vassiliki Betty (1999). “The 1959 Darwin centennial celebration in America,” Osiris 14: 274–323
Sober, Elliott (2000). Philosophy of biology. 2nd. ed. Boulder, CO: Westview Press
Spemann, H. (1915). “Zur Geschichte und Kritik des Begriffs der Homologie.” In Die Kultur der Gegenwart. Edited by Hinneberg, E.. Leipzig, Germany: Teubner, pp. 63–96
Spurway, H. (1949). “Remarks on Vavilov's law of homologous variation,” Supplemento a La Ricerca Scientifica 19: 18–24
Stevens, Peter F. (1994). The development of biological systematics. New York: Columbia University Press
Stevens, Peter F. (1997). “How to interpret botanical classifications – suggestions from history,” Bioscience 47: 243–250
Stevens, Peter F., and Cullens, S. P. (1990). “Linnaeus, the cortex-medulla theory, and the key to his understanding of plant form and natural relationships,” Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 71: 179–220
Strickland, Hugh E. (1840). “Observations on the affinities and analogies of organized beings,” Magazine of Natural History 4: 210–226
Tax, Sol (1960). Evolution after Darwin vol. 1: The evolution of life. Chicago: Chicago University Press
Thieffry, Denis (1996). “Escherichia coli as a model system with which to study cell differentiation,” History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 18: 163–193
Steen, Wim J. (1996). “Screening-off and natural selection,” Philosophy of Science 63: 115–121
Weele, Cor (1999). Images of development: Environmental causes in ontogeny. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press
Fraassen, Bas (1980). The scientific image. Oxford: Clarendon Press
Speybroeck, Linda (2002). “Philosophers and biologists exploring epigenetics,” Biology and Philosophy 17: 743–746
Vavilov, N. I. (1922). “The law of homologous series in variation,” Journal of Genetics 12: 47–87
Waddington, Conrad H. (1939). An introduction to modern genetics. London: Allen & Unwin
Waddington, Conrad H. (1940). Organisers and genes. London: Cambridge University Press
Waddington, Conrad H. (1953). “Epigenetics and evolution.” In Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology VII: Evolution. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, pp. 186–199
Wagner, Günter P. (1989a). “The biological homology concept,” Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 20: 51–69
Wagner, Günter P. (1989b). “The origin of morphological characters and the biological basis of homology,” Evolution 43: 1157–1171
Wagner, Günter P. (2000). “What is the promise of developmental evolution? Part I: Why is developmental biology necessary to explain evolutionary innovations,” Journal of Experimental Zoology 288: 95–98
Wagner, Günter P. (2001a). The character concept in evolutionary biology. San Diego, CA: Academic Press
Wagner, Günter P. (2001b). “Characters, units, and natural kinds: An introduction.” In The character concept in evolutionary biology. Edited by Wagner, Günter P.. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp. 1–10
Wagner, Günter P. (forthcoming). The biological homology concept and its applications. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
Waisbren, Steven James (1988). “The importance of morphology in the Evolutionary Synthesis as demonstrated by the contributions of the Oxford Group: Goodrich, Huxley, and de Beer,” Journal of the History of Biology 21: 291–330
Wake, David B. (1991). “Homoplasy: The result of natural selection, or evidence of design limitations?,” American Naturalist 138: 543–567
Wake, David B. (1996). “Evolutionary developmental biology – prospects for an evolutionary synthesis at the developmental level.” In New perspectives on the history of life: Essays on systematic biology as historical narrative. Edited by Ghiselin, Michael T. and Pinna, G.. San Francisco: California Academy of Sciences, pp. 97–107
Wallace, Bruce (1986). “Can embryologists contribute to an understanding of evolutionary mechanisms?” In Integrating scientific disciplines. Edited by Bechtel, William. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, pp. 149–163
Walsh, Denis M. (2003). “Fit and diversity: Explaining adaptive evolution,” Philosophy of Science 70: 280–301
Waterhouse, George R. (1843). “Observations on the classification of the Mammalia,” Annals and Magazine of Natural History 12: 399–412
Whewell, William (1836). Astronomy and general physics, considered with reference to natural theology. Philadelphia: Carey, Lea & Blanchard
Whewell, William (1837). History of the inductive sciences: From the earliest to the present times. 2 vols., 1st ed. New York: Appleton
Whewell, William (1863). History of the inductive sciences: From the earliest to the present times. 2 vols., 3rd ed., with additions. New York: Appleton
Williams, George C. (1966). Adaptation and natural selection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
Williams, George C. (1992). Natural selection: Domains, levels, and challenges. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press
Winsor, Mary P. (1976). Starfish, jellyfish, and the order of life. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press
Winsor, Mary P. (1979). “Louis Agassiz and the species question,” Studies in History of Biology 4: 89–117
Winsor, Mary P. (2003). “Non-essentialist methods in pre-Darwinian taxonomy,” Biology and Philosophy 18: 387–400
Winsor, Mary P. (forthcoming). “The creation of the Essentialism Story (an exercise in metahistory),” Journal of the History of Biology
Winther, Rasmus G. (2000). “Darwin on variation and heredity,” Journal of the History of Biology 33: 425–455
Winther, Rasmus G. (2001). “August Weismann on germ-plasm variation,” Journal of the History of Biology 34: 517–555
Wolpert, Lewis (1991). The triumph of the embryo. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press
Wray, Gregory A. (2001). “Development: Resolving the Hox paradox,” Science 292 (5525): 2256–2257
Wright, Sewall (1941). “The physiology of the gene,” Physiological Reviews 21: 487–527
Wright, Sewall (1945). “Genes as physiological agents,” American Naturalist 79: 289–303
Zirkle, Conway (1951). “The knowledge of heredity before 1900.” In Genetics in the 20th century. Edited by Dunn, Leslie C.. New York: Macmillan, pp. 35–57
Zirkle, Conway (1959). “Species before Darwin,” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 103: 636–644
