Crossref Citations
This Book has been
cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
Smolka, Jennifer
2022.
Argumentation in the Interpretation of Statutory Law and International Law: Not Ejusdem Generis.
Languages,
Vol. 7,
Issue. 2,
p.
132.
Hadži-Stević, Brano
2022.
The principle of coherence in Serbian Constitutional Court decisions about uniqueness of legal system.
Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta, Novi Sad,
Vol. 56,
Issue. 1,
p.
257.
Walton, Douglas
and
Macagno, Fabrizio
2022.
Encyclopedia of the Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy.
p.
1.
Rotolo, Antonino
and
Sartor, Giovanni
2022.
Encyclopedia of the Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy.
p.
1.
Suharsono, Agus
2023.
Argumentasi Hukum Hakim Agung Dalam Putusan Sengketa Pajak Pertambahan Nilai Penjualan Agunan Oleh Perusahaan Jasa Keuangan.
Yustitiabelen,
Vol. 9,
Issue. 1,
p.
24.
Walton, Douglas
and
Macagno, Fabrizio
2023.
Encyclopedia of the Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy.
p.
1881.
Macagno, Fabrizio
and
Salvato, Lucia
2023.
Argumentation and the interpretation of religious texts.
Journal of Argumentation in Context,
Vol. 12,
Issue. 1,
p.
2.
Macagno, Fabrizio
and
Damele, Giovanni
2023.
The boundaries of lying.
Journal of Argumentation in Context,
Vol. 12,
Issue. 1,
p.
19.
Rotolo, Antonino
and
Sartor, Giovanni
2023.
Argumentation and explanation in the law.
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence,
Vol. 6,
Issue. ,
Guitton, Clement
Tamò-Larrieux, Aurelia
and
Mayer, Simon
2023.
Mapping the Issues of Automated Legal Systems: Why Worry About Automatically Processable Regulation?.
Artificial Intelligence and Law,
Vol. 31,
Issue. 3,
p.
571.
Rotolo, Antonino
and
Sartor, Giovanni
2023.
Encyclopedia of the Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy.
p.
159.
Sartor, Giovanni
2023.
Interpretation, Argumentation, and the Determinacy of Law.
Ratio Juris,
Vol. 36,
Issue. 3,
p.
214.
Liga, Davide
2024.
New Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence.
Vol. 14644,
Issue. ,
p.
132.
Marji, Zaid
and
Licato, John
2024.
Evaluating large language models’ ability to generate interpretive arguments.
Argument & Computation,
p.
1.
Zorzetto , Silvia
2024.
Analogy and legal reasoning: a cluster of open questions.
Revista de la Facultad de Derecho de México,
Vol. 74,
Issue. 290,
p.
303.
Bilgin, Onur
Fields, Logan
Laverghetta, Antonio
Marji, Zaid
Nighojkar, Animesh
Steinle, Stephen
and
Licato, John
2024.
Exploring Prompting Approaches in Legal Textual Entailment.
The Review of Socionetwork Strategies,
Vol. 18,
Issue. 1,
p.
75.
Spaić, Bojan
and
Isibor, Roberto
2024.
When legal interpretation is not about language.
Journal of Argumentation in Context,
Vol. 13,
Issue. 1,
p.
131.
Stein, Dieter
2024.
On Genre as the Primary Unit of Language (Not Only) in Law.
Languages,
Vol. 9,
Issue. 11,
p.
333.
Araszkiewicz, Michał
and
Koszowy, Marcin
2024.
The Structure of Arguments from Deontic Authority and How to Successfully Attack Them.
Argumentation,
Vol. 38,
Issue. 2,
p.
171.