During the early modern period, the publication process decisively shaped the history play and its reception. Bringing together the methodologies of genre criticism and book history, this study argues that stationers have – through acts of selection and presentation – constructed some remarkably influential expectations and ideas surrounding genre. Amy Lidster boldly challenges the uncritical use of Shakespeare's Folio as a touchstone for the history play, exposing the harmful ways in which this has solidified its parameters as a genre exclusively interested in the lives of English kings. Reframing the Folio as a single example of participation in genre-making, this book illuminates the exciting and diverse range of historical pasts that were available to readers and audiences in the early modern period. Lidster invites us to reappraise the connection between plays on stage and in print, and to reposition playbooks within the historical culture and geopolitics of the book trade.

'A valuable resource for those focused on Shakespeare or book history … Recommended.'

J. Rodzvilla Source: Choice

‘Lidster’s work is worthwhile for those studying the history play in its many forms. The prose throughout is lucid and helpful, and an appendix detailing various collections of plays in the period shows off the depth of Lidster’s organized approach. … Ultimately, this is a remarkable book, one that finds surprising insights through those publisher names that lurk near the bottom of the title pages.’

Kyle Pivetti Source: Shakespeare Quarterly