Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Books
  3. Politics in the Roman Republic
  • Cited by 46
Publisher:
Cambridge University Press
Online publication date:
March 2017
Print publication year:
2017
Online ISBN:
9781139410861
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139410861
Subjects:
Ancient History, Classical Studies, History of Ideas, Politics and International Relations
Series:
Key Themes in Ancient History
Information

Book description

The politics of the Roman Republic has in recent decades been the subject of intense debate, covering issues such as the degree of democracy and popular influence, 'parties' and ideology, politics as public ritual, and the character of Rome's political culture. This engaging book examines all these issues afresh, and presents an original synthesis of Rome's political institutions and practices. It begins by explaining the development of the Roman constitution over time before turning to the practical functioning of the Republic, focusing particularly on the role of the populus Romanus and the way its powers were expressed in the popular assemblies. Henrik Mouritsen concludes by exploring continuity and change in Roman politics as well as the process by which the republican system was eventually replaced by monarchy. This original and readable book will be important for all students and scholars of Roman history and of politics in general.

Refine List

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

Contents

Contents
  • Chapter 2 - Leaders and Masses in the Roman Republic
    pp 54-104
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • HTML
    • Export citation
References

Bibliographic Essay

The Roman republic, its politics and spectacular ‘fall’ have fascinated centuries of scholars and historians, going all the way back to renaissance Italy, where humanists such as Flavio Biondo and Machiavelli first subjected the republican constitution to serious study. Since then the amount of written works on the topic has grown exponentially and the sheer scale of the secondary literature means that this brief survey can merely skim the surface and mention a few major contributions, mostly from the last decades.

Useful introductions to Roman politics include Nicolet 1980, Beard and Crawford 1985, Patterson 1999, as well as the relevant chapters in Wiseman 1985b, Flower 2014, and Morstein-Marx and Rosenstein 2010. The fundamental syntheses of Roman politics and its workings remain Meier 1980 (1966), Gruen 1974, Finley 1983, Brunt 1988, and Pani 1997. Although very different in scope and approach, each of these works represents invaluable contributions to our understanding of the political process.

The Political System

The fundamental study of the Roman republican constitution remains Mommsen’s monumental Das Römische Staatsrecht, which still provides an inexhaustible source of information and interpretations, now to be read in conjunction with the papers in Nippel and Seidensticker eds., 2005. A useful overview of the political institutions in English can be found in Lintott 1999, while a short summary can be found in Mouritsen 2015a. A number of important studies have appeared dedicated to individual institutions and offices. For the assemblies, Taylor 1966 and Staveley 1972 are still essential; for levels of participation in assemblies, see Mouritsen 2001. The consulship was recently discussed by Pina Polo 2011, who is also responsible for an important study of the contio, 1996. Brennan published an exhaustive study of the praetorship in Rome, while the workings of the senate have been the subject of detailed investigations by Bonnefond-Coudry 1989 and Ryan 1998. For the evolution of Rome’s constitution the standard accounts are Cornell 1995 and the papers collected in Raaflaub 2005 (1986). Linke 1995 offers an original interpretation of Rome’s early state formation drawing on anthropological approaches. On public law in republican Rome Bleicken 1975b is fundamental, as is the edition of statutes in Crawford 1996.

Leaders and Masses

Gelzer’s classic work on republican politics and society from 1912 (and Seager’s 1969 English edition) is still worth consulting on these issues. Nicolet 1980 represented an innovative way at looking at politics from the perspective of the citizen rather than the politicians. The volume edited by Wallace-Hadrill 1989 is still important on clientela in Rome. Through a series of articles culminating in the monograph The Crowd in Rome in the Late Republic Millar sparked a lively debate on the extent of popular influence on Roman politics. Critical responses include Jehne ed. 1995c and Hölkeskamp 2010 (2004). The interaction between politicians and the ‘people’, its scale and implications, have been the object of intense discussion in recent years, mostly focused on the contiones. Among the contributions have been Pina Polo 1996, Mouritsen 2001, Morstein-Marx 2004, Flaig 2003, and the collection of papers recently published by Steel and Van der Blom 2013.

While much Anglo-Saxon scholarship since Millar’s intervention has evolved around the existence (or absence) of a Roman ‘democracy’, German scholarship has over the last two decades moved in a different direction, developing its own distinctive voice and approach to the Roman republic and particularly its ‘political culture’. The result has been some stimulating and original new contributions to our understanding of the republic. For example, Hölkeskamp 2011 (1987) traced the formation of the nobilitas and its distinct value system, Flaig 2003 applied sociological models in the study on political performance and rituals, while Jehne in a series of articles has explored a wide variety of aspects of political practice and ideology in republican Rome. In a major study Walter 2004 considered the relationship between public memory, ideology and politics. The identity of the elite is also the subject of Flower’s interesting discussion of ancestor masks, 1996. The mos maiorum is the subject of an important volume edited by Linke and Stemmler 2000.

The Practice of Politics

In a ground-breaking chapter Hopkins and Burton 1983 investigated the composition of the Roman elite and its degree of continuity and fluidity. Their results were refined in a study by Badian 1990c which concentrated on the consuls, reaching somewhat different but nevertheless compatible results. Most recently Beck 2005 revisited the issue in a major study.

Traditionally, an important strand of scholarship interpreted political practice according to the so-called factio theory, which assumed that family groups, reconstructed on the basis of marriages, adoptions and office holding, formed the basic building stones of Rome’s political structure. The leading proponents of this approach were historians like Münzer and Scullard, but after the critiques of e.g. Meier 1980 (1966) and Brunt 1988 the approach has been largely abandoned. In its place the ‘two-party-model’ has emerged as the dominant framework used to interpret Roman politics, especially during the later republic. While central already to Mommsen’s Römische Geschichte, it was most fully developed in Taylor’s 1949 classic exploration of Roman ‘party politics’. Despite fundamental criticism by e.g. Strasburger 1939, Meier 1965, and Gruen 1974, the binary model has now become part and parcel of the discussion, often closely associated with Millar’s ‘Roman democracy’ paradigm, cf. e.g. Wiseman 2009. Most recently Robb’s 2010 examination of political terminology has placed the issue on a new footing, and there may be signs that the ‘ideological’ trend may have peaked, cf. Russell 2013.

The end of the Roman republic has been much debated, and the classic contributions remain those of Syme 1939, Meier 1980 (1966), Gruen 1974, and Brunt 1988, who still define the main positions. Jehne’s (2009b) exploration of Caesar’s options represents an original addition to this discussion. Most recently Blösel 2011 has added another aspect to the debate, focusing on the ‘demilitarisation’ of the Roman ruling class which was to have far-reaching consequences for its survival.

Bibliography

Adamietz, J. 1989. Marcus Tullius Cicero. Pro Murena. Darmstadt.
Almond, G. A. and Verba, S. 1963. The Civic Culture. Princeton.
Alonso-Nuñes, J. M. 1982. The Ages of Rome. Amsterdam.
Alston, R. 2002. ‘The role of the military in the Roman revolution’, Aquila 3: 7–41.
Alston, R. 2015. Rome’s Revolution. Death of the Republic and Birth of the Empire. Oxford.
Amici, C. M. 2005. ‘Evoluzione architettonica del Comizio a Roma’, RPAA 77: 351–79.
Arena, V. 2011. ‘The consulship of 78 BC. Catulus versus Lepidus: an optimates versus populares affair’, in Consuls and res publica. Holding High Office in the Roman Republic, ed. Beck, H., Duplá, A., Jehne, M. and Pina Polo, F.. Cambridge: 299–318.
Arena, V. 2012. Libertas and the Practice of Politics in the Late Roman Republic. Cambridge.
Asmis, E. 2005. ‘A new kind of Model. Cicero’s Roman constitution in De republica’, AJPh 126: 376–416.
Astin, A. E. 1958. The Lex Annalis before Sulla. Coll. Latomus 23. Brussels.
Astin, A. E. 1967. Scipio Aemilianus. Oxford.
Atkins, E. M. 2000. ‘Cicero’, in The Cambridge History of Greek and Roman Political Thought, ed. Rowe, C. and Schofield, M.. Cambridge: 477–516.
Atkins, J. W. 2013. Cicero on Politics and the Limits of Reason. Cambridge.
Badian, E. 1962a. ‘From the Gracchi to Sulla (Forschungsbericht 1940–59)’, Historia 11: 197–245.
Badian, E. 1962b. ‘Waiting for Sulla’, JRS 52: 47–61.
Badian, E. 1972. ‘Tiberius Gracchus and the beginning of the Roman revolution’, ANRW 1.1: 668–731.
Badian, E. 1990a. ‘Diskussion: Sektion I Politik und Religion’, in Staat und Staatlichkeit in der frühen römischen Republik, ed. Eder, W.. Stuttgart: 84–9.
Badian, E. 1990b. ‘Kommentar: Magistratur und Gesellschaft’, in Staat und Staatlichkeit in der frühen römischen Republik, ed. Eder, W.. Stuttgart: 458–75.
Badian, E. 1990c. ‘The consuls 179–49 B.C.’, Chiron 20: 371–413.
Badian, E. 1996. ‘Tribuni plebis and res publica’, in Imperium sine fine. T. Robert S. Broughton and the Roman Republic, ed. Linderski, J.. Historia Einzelschriften 105. Stuttgart: 187–213.
Badian, E. 2009. ‘From the Iulii to Caesar’, in A Companion to Julius Caesar, ed. Griffin, M.. Oxford: 11–22.
Beard, M. and Crawford, M. H. 1999. Rome in the Late Republic. 2nd edn. London. 1st edn. 1985.
Beard, M., North, J. and Price, S. 1998. Religions of Rome. Cambridge.
Beck, H. 2005. Karriere und Hierarchie. Die römische Aristokratie und die Anfänge des cursus honorum in der mittleren Republik. Klio Beiheft 10. Berlin.
Beck, H., Duplá, A., Jehne, M., and Pina Polo, F. eds. 2011. Consuls and res publica. Holding High Office in the Roman Republic. Cambridge.
Beness, L. and Hillard, T. 2012. ‘Another voice against the “tyranny” of Scipio Aemilianus in 129 B.C.?’, Historia 61: 270–81.
Béranger, J. 1972. ‘Les jugements de Cicéron sur les Gracques’, ANRW 1.1: 732–63.
Bergk, A. 2011. ‘The development of the praetorship in the third century BC’, in Consuls and res publica. Holding High Office in the Roman Republic, ed. Beck, H., Duplá, A., Jehne, M., and Pina Polo, F.. Cambridge: 61–74.
Betts, E. 2011. ‘Towards a multisensory experience of movement in the city of Rome’, in Rome, Ostia, Pompeii. Movement and Space, ed. Laurence, R. and Newsome, D. J.. Oxford: 118–32.
Bleckmann, B. 2002. Die römische Nobilität im Ersten Punischen Krieg. Untersuchungen zur aristokratischen Konkurrenz in der Republik. Klio Beiheft 5. Berlin.
Bleicken, J. 1955. Das Volkstribunat der klassischen Republik. Studien zu seiner Entwicklung zwischen 287 und 133 v. Chr. Zetemata 13. Munich.
Bleicken, J. 1975a. Die Verfassung der römischen Republik. Paderborn.
Bleicken, J. 1975b. Lex Publica. Gesetz und Recht in der römischen Republik. Berlin – New York.
Bleicken, J. 1981. ‘Das römische Volkstribunat. Versuch einer Analyse seiner politischen Funktion in republikanischer Zeit’, Chiron 11: 87–108.
Blom, H. 2010. Cicero’s Role Models. The Political Strategy of a Newcomer. Oxford.
Blösel, W. 1998. ‘Die Anakyklosis – Theorie und die Verfassung im Spiegel des sechsten Buches des Polybius und Ciceros “De re publica”, Buch II’, Hermes 126: 31–57.
Blösel, W. 2011. ‘Die Demilitarisierung der römischen Nobilität von Sulla bis Caesar’, in Von der militia equestris zur militia urbana. Prominenzrollen und Karrierefelder im antiken Rom, ed. Blösel, W. and Hölkeskamp, K.-J.. Stuttgart: 55–80.
Bonnefond-Coudry, M. 1989. Le sénat de la république romaine de la guerre d’Hannibal à Auguste. Collection de l’École française de Rome. 273. Paris – Rome.
Botsford, G. W. 1909. The Roman Assemblies from their Origin to the End of the Republic. New York.
Brennan, T. C. 2000. The Praetorship in the Roman Republic. 2 vols. Oxford.
Brennan, T. C. 2014. ‘Power and process under the Republican “constitution” ’, in The Cambridge Companion to the Roman Republic, ed. Flower, H.. 2nd edn. Cambridge: 19–53. 1st edn. 2004.
Bringmann, K. 1977. ‘Weltherrschaft und innere Krise Roms im Spiegel der Geschichtsschreibung des zweiten und ersten Jahrhunderts v. Chr.’, A&A: 28–49.
Bringmann, K. 2003. ‘Zur Überlieferung und zum Entstehungsgrund der lex Claudia de nave senatoris’, Klio 85: 312–21.
Brunt, P. A. 1971. Italian Manpower 225 B.C. – A.D. 14. Oxford.
Brunt, P. A. 1988. The Fall of the Roman Republic and Related Essays. Oxford.
Bruun, C. ed. 2000. The Roman Middle Republic. Religion, Politics, and Historiography c. 400 – 133 B.C. Acta Instituti Romani Finlandiae 23. Rome.
Burckhardt, L. A. 1988. Politische Strategien der Optimaten in der späten römischen Republik. Historia Einzelschriften 57. Stuttgart.
Burckhardt, L. A. 1990. ‘The political elite of the Roman Republic: comments on recent discussion of the concepts nobilitas and homo novus’, Historia 39: 77–99.
Burton, P. 2014. ‘The revolt of Lepidus (cos. 78 BC) revisited’, Historia 63: 404–21.
Casavola, F. P. 1988. ‘Relazione introduttiva’, in Roma tra oligarchia e democrazia. Classi sociali e formazione del diritto in epoca medio-repubblicana. Napoli: 23–37.
Cavaggioni, F. 2010. Generali e sconfitta militare a Roma agli albori della repubblica (509–290 A.C.). Padova.
Champion, C. B. 2004. Cultural Politics in Polybius’ Histories. Berkeley.
Clemente, G. 1983. ‘Il plebiscito Claudio e le classe dirigenti romane nell’età dell’imperialismo’, Ktema 8: 253–9.
Cornell, T. J. 1991. ‘Rome: the history of an anachronism’, in City States in Classical Antiquity and Medieval Italy, ed. Molho, A., Raaflaub, K., and Emlen, J.. Ann Arbor – Stuttgart: 53–69.
Cornell, T. J. 1995. The Beginnings of Rome. Italy and Rome from the Bronze Age to the Punic Wars (c.1000–264 BC). London – New York.
Cornell, T. J. 2000. ‘The lex Ovinia and the emancipation of the Senate’, in The Roman Middle Republic. Religion, Politics, and Historiography c. 400–133 B.C., ed. Bruun, C.. Acta Instituti Romani Finlandiae 23. Rome: 69–89.
Courrier, C. 2014. La plèbe de Rome et sa culture (fin du IIe siècle av. J.-C. – fin du 1er siècle ap. J.-C.). Rome.
Crawford, M. H. ed. 1996. Roman Statutes. BICS Suppl. 64. London.
David, J.-M. 1983. ‘Sfida o vendetta, minaccia o ricatto: L’accusa pubblica nelle mani dei giovani Romani alla fine della Repubblica’, in La paura dei padri nella società antica e medievale, ed. Pellizer, E. and Zorzetti, N.. Roma – Bari: 99–112.
David, J.-M. 1992. Le patronat judiciaire au dernier siècle de la République romaine. Rome.
David, J.-M. 1993. ‘Conformisme et transgression: à propos du tribunat de la plèbe à la fin de la République romaine’, Klio 75: 219–27.
Deininger, J. 1980. ‘Explaining the change from Republic to Principate in Rome’, Comparative Civilizations Review 4: 77–101.
Deininger, J. 1996. ‘Der Wandel von der Republik zum Prinzipat in Rome: ein Ausnahmefall der antiken Verfassungsentwicklung?’ in Griechenland und Rom. Vergleichende Untersuchungen zu Entwicklungstendenzen und –höhepunkten der antiken Geschichte, Kunst und Literatur, ed. Schmidt, E. G.. Tbilisi – Erlangen – Jena: 81–94.
Deininger, J. 1998. ‘Zur Kontroverse über die Lebensfähigkeit der Republik in Rom’, in Imperium Romanum. Studien zu Geschichte und Rezeption. Festschrift für Karl Christ zum 75. Geburtstag, ed. Kneissl, P. and Losemann, V.. Stuttgart: 123–36.
De Libero, L. 1992. Obstruktion. Politische Praktiken im Senat und in der Volksversammlung der ausgehenden römischen Republik. Hermes Einzelschriften 59. Stuttgart.
Deniaux, E. 1993. Clientèles et pouvoir à l’époque de Cicéron. Collection de l’École française de Rome. 182. Paris – Rome.
De Sanctis, G. 1907. Storia di Roma I-II. La conquista del primato in Italia. Turin.
Develin, R. 1975. ‘Comitia tributa plebis’, Athenaeum 53: 302–77.
Develin, R. 1977a. ‘Comitia tributa again’, Athenaeum 55: 425–6.
Develin, R. 1977b. ‘Lex curiata and the competence of magistrates’, Mnemosyne 30: 49–65.
Develin, R. 1978a. ‘The Atinian plebiscite, tribunes and the Senate’, CQ 28: 141–4.
Develin, R. 1978b. ‘Scipio Aemilianus and the Consular elections of 148 B.C.’, Latomus 37: 484–8.
Develin, R. 1978c. ‘The third century reform of the comitia centuriata’, Athenaeum 56: 346–77.
Develin, R. 1979. ‘The voting position of the equites after the centuriate reform’, RhM 122: 154–61.
Develin, R. 1985. The Practice of Politics at Rome 366–167 B.C. Coll. Latomus. 188. Bruxelles.
Diehl, H. 1988. Sulla und seine Zeit im Urteil Ciceros. Hildesheim.
Doblhofer, G. 1990. Die Popularen der Jahre 111–99 vor Christus: eine Studie zur Geschichte der späten römischen Republik. Vienna.
Duplá, A. 2011. ‘Consules populares’, in Consuls and res publica. Holding High Office in the Roman Republic, ed. Beck, H., Duplá, A., Jehne, M., and Pina Polo, F.. Cambridge: 279–98.
Dyck, A. R. 2004. A Commentary on Cicero, De Legibus. Ann Arbor.
Eder, W. 1990a. ‘Der Bürger und sein Staat – Der Staat und seine Bürger’, in Staat und Staatlichkeit in der frühen römischen Republik, ed. Eder, W.. Stuttgart: 12–32.
Eder, W. 1991. ‘Who Rules? Power and Participation in Athens and Rome’, in City States in Classical Antiquity and Medieval Italy, ed. Molho, A., Raaflaub, K., and Emlen, J.. Ann Arbor – Stuttgart: 169–96.
Eder, W. 1996. ‘Republicans and sinners: the decline of the Roman Republic and the end of a provisional arrangement’, in Transitions to Empire. Essays in Graeco-Roman History 360–146 B.C. in Honor of E. Badian, ed. Wallace, R. W. and Harris, E. M.. Oklahoma: 439–61.
Eder, W. ed. 1990b. Staat und Staatlichkeit in der frühen römischen Republik. Stuttgart.
Eilers, C. 1996. ‘Silanus <and> Murena (I.Priene 121)’, CQ 46: 175–82.
Evans, R. J. 2007. ‘The Sulpician law on debt: implications for the political elite and broader ramifications’, AClass 50: 81–94.
Fantham, E. 1973. ‘Aequabilitas in Cicero’s political theory, and the Greek tradition of proportional justice’, CQ 23: 285–90.
Ferrary, J.-L. 1984a. ‘L’archéologie du ‘De re publica’ (2.2.4–37,63): Cicéron entre Polybe et Platon’, JRS 74: 87–98.
Ferrary, J.-L. 1997. ‘Optimates et populares: le problème du role de l’idéologie dans la politique’, in Die späte römische Republik. La Fin de la République romaine. un débat franco-allemand d’histoire et d’historiographie, ed. Bruhns, H., David, J.-M., Nippel, W.. Collection de l’École française de Rome 235. Rome: 221–31.
Ferrary, J.-L. 2012. ‘L’iter legis, de la rédaction de la rogatio à la publication de la lex rogata’, in Leges publicae. La legge nell’esperienza giuridica romana, ed. Ferrary, J.-L.. Pavia: 3–37.
Ferrary, J.-L. ed. 1984b. Leges publicae. La legge nell’esperienza giuridica romana. Pavia.
Fezzi, L. 1999. ‘La legislazione tribunicia di Publio Clodio Pulchro (58 a.C.) e la ricerca del consenso a Roma’, SCO 47: 245–341.
Fezzi, L. 2008. Il tribuno Clodio. Rome.
Finer, S. E. 1997. The History of Government from the Earliest Times. Volume II: The Intermediate Ages. Oxford.
Finley, M. I. 1983. Politics in the Ancient World. Cambridge.
Fiori, R. 2014. ‘La convocazione dei comizi centuriati’, ZRG 131: 60–176.
Flaig, E. 1995a. ‘Entscheidung und Konsens. Zu den Feldern der politischen Kommunikation zwischen Aristokratie und Plebs’, in Demokratie in Rom? Die Rolle des Volkes in der Politik der römischen Republik, ed. Jehne, M.. Historia Einzelschriften 96. Stuttgart: 77–127.
Flaig, E. 1995b. ‘Die Pompa Funebris. Adlige Konkurrenz und annalistische Erinnerung in der römische Republik’, in Memoria als Kultur, ed. Oexle, O. G.. Göttingen: 115–48.
Flaig, E. 2003. Ritualisierte Politik: Zeichen, Gesten und Herrschaft in alten Rom. Göttingen.
Flaig, E. 2004. ‘Review of F. X. Ryan, Rank and Participation in the Republican Senate’, Gnomon 76: 331–41.
Flower, H. I. 1996. Ancestor Masks and Aristocratic Power in Roman Culture. Oxford.
Flower, H. I. 2010. Roman Republics. Princeton.
Flower, H. I. ed. 2014. The Cambridge Companion to the Roman Republic. 2nd edn. Cambridge. 1st edn. 2004.
Forsythe, G. 1988. ‘The political background of the Lex Calpurnia of 149 B.C.’, AncW 17: 109–19.
Forsythe, G. 2005. A Critical History of Early Rome. From Prehistory to the First Punic War. Berkeley.
Fraccaro, P. 1957. ‘La procedura del voto nei comizi tribute romani’, in Opuscula II. Studi sull’età della rivoluzione romana. Scritti di diritto public. Militaria. Pavia: 235–54.
Frederiksen, M. W. 1966. ‘Caesar, Cicero and the problem of debt’, JRS 56: 128–41.
Frier, B. W. 1971. ‘Sulla’s propaganda and the collapse of the Cinnan Republic’, AJPh 92: 585–604.
Fritz, K.. 1954. The Theory of the Mixed Constitution in Antiquity. New York.
Gabba, E. 1976. Republican Rome, the Army and the Allies. Transl. Cuff, P. J.. Oxford.
Gabba, E. 1984. ‘Il consenso popolare alla politica espansionistica romana fra III et II sec. a.C.’ in The Imperialism of Mid-Republican Rome, ed. Harris, W. V.. PMAAR 29: Rome: 115–29.
Gabba, E. 1987. ‘Maximus Comitiatus’, Athenaeum 75: 203–5.
Gabba, E. 1988. ‘Assemblee ed esercito a Rome fra IV e III sec.a.C.’, in Roma tra oligarchia e democrazia. Classi sociali e formazione del diritto in epoca medio-repubblicana. Napoli: 41–54.
Gabba, E. 1990. ‘Democrazia a Roma’, Athenaeum 85: 266–71.
Garnsey, P. D. A. 1988. Famine and Food Supply in the Graeco-Roman World. Cambridge.
Garnsey, P. D. A. 2010. ‘Roman patronage’, in From the Tetrarchs to the Theodosians. Later Roman History and Culture, 284–450 CE, ed. McGill, S.. Cambridge: 33–54.
Gauthier, P. 1974. ‘“Générosité” romaine et “avarice” greque. Sur l’octroi du droit de cité’, in Mélanges d’histoire ancienne offerts a William Seston. Paris: 207–15.
Gauthier, P. 1981. ‘La citoyenneté en Grèce et à Rome; participation et intégration’, Ktema 6: 167–79.
Gauthier, P. 1990. ‘Quorum et participation civique dans les démocraties grecques’, CCG 1: 73–99.
Gelzer, M. 1912. Die Nobilität der römischen Republik. Leipzig – Berlin. Rev. English edn. 1969. The Roman Nobility. Transl. R. Seager. Oxford: 1–140.
Giovannini, A. 1985. ‘Auctoritas patrum’, MH 42: 28–36.
Giovannini, A. 1990. ‘Magistratur und Volk. Ein Beitrag zur Entstehungsgeschichte des Staatsrechts’, in Staat und Staatlichkeit in der frühen römischen Republik, ed. Eder, W.. Stuttgart: 606–36.
Giovannini, A. 1995. ‘Catilina et le problème des dettes’, in Leaders and Masses in the Roman World. Studies in Honor of Zvi Yavetz, ed. Malkin, I. and Rubinsohn, Z. W.. Leiden – New York – Köln: 15–32.
Giovannini, A. 2012. ‘Le senatus consultum ultimum. Les mensonges de Cicéron’, Athenaeum 100: 181–96.
Girardet, K. M. 1983. Die Ordnung der Welt. Ein Beitrag zur philosophischen und politischen Interpretation von Ciceros Schrift De Legibus. Historia Einzelschriften 42. Stuttgart.
Goldbeck, F. 2010. Salutationes. Die Morgenbegrüssungen in Rom in der Republik und der frühen Kaiserzeit. Klio Beifhefte 16. Berlin.
Golden, G. K. 2013. Crisis Management during the Roman Republic. The Role of Political Institutions in Emergencies. Cambridge.
Goldmann, F. 2002. ‘Nobilitas als Status und Gruppe. Überlegungen zum Nobilitätsbegriff der römischen Republik’, in Res publica reperta. Zur Verfassung und Gesellschaft der römischen Republik und des frühen Prinzipats. Festschrift für Jochen Bleicken zum 75. Geburtstag, ed. Spielvogel, J.. Stuttgart: 53–66.
Graeber, A. 2001. Auctoritas Patrum. Formen und Wege der Senatsherrschaft zwischen Politik und Tradition. Berlin.
Grieve, L. 1985. ‘The reform of the comitia centuriata’, Historia 34: 278–309.
Grieve, L. 1987. ‘Proci patricii: a question of voting order in the centuriate assembly’, Historia 36: 302–17.
Griffin, M. 1973. ‘The tribune C. Cornelius’, JRS 63: 196–213.
Griffin, M. 2009. ed. A Companion to Julius Caesar. Oxford.
Grimm, D. 2009. Souveränität. Herkunft und Zukunft eines Schlüsselbegriffs. Berlin.
Gruen, E. S. 1968. Roman Politics and the Criminal Courts, 149–78 B.C. Cambridge, MA.
Gruen, E. S. 1974. The Last Generation of the Roman Republic. Berkeley.
Gruen, E. S. 1990. ‘Review of L. A. Burckhardt, Politische Strategien der Optimaten in der späten römischen Republik’, Gnomon 62: 179–81.
Gruen, E. S. 1991. ‘The Exercise of Power in the Roman Republic’, in City States in Classical Antiquity and Medieval Italy, ed. Molho, A., Raaflaub, K., and Emlen, J.. Ann Arbor – Stuttgart: 252–67.
Gruen, E. S. 1996. ‘The Roman oligarchy: image and perception’, in Imperium Sine Fine. T. Robert S. Broughton and the Roman Republic, ed. Linderski, J.. Historia Einzelschriften 105. Stuttgart: 215–43.
Gruen, E. S. 2009. ‘Caesar as politician’, in A Companion to Julius Caesar, ed. Griffin, M.. Oxford: 23–36.
Hackl, U. 1972. ‘Das Ende der römischen Tribusgründungen 241 v. chr’, Chiron 2: 135–70.
Hahm, D. E. 1995. ‘Polybius’ applied political theory’, in Justice and Generosity. Studies in Hellenistic Social and Political Philosophy, ed. Laks, A. and Schofield, M.. Cambridge: 7–47.
Hall, U. 1964. ‘Voting Procedure in Roman Assemblies’, Historia 13: 267–306.
Hantos, Th. 1988. Res publica constituta. Die Verfassung des Dictators Sulla. Hermes Einzelschriften 50. Stuttgart.
Harris, W. V. 1985. War and Imperialism in Republican Rome, 327–70 B.C. Rev. ed. Oxford. 1st ed. 1979.
Harris, W. V. 1989. Ancient Literacy. Cambridge, MA.
Harris, W. V. 1990. ‘On defining the political culture of the Roman Republic: some comments on Rosenstein, Williamson, and North’, CPh 85: 288–94.
Heikkilä, K. 1993. ‘Lex non iure rogata: Senate and Annulment of Laws in the Late Republic’, in Senatus Populusque Romanus. Studies in Roman Republican Legislation, ed. Vaahtera, J.. Acta Instituti Romani Finlandiae 13. Rome: 117–42.
Hellegouarc’h, J. 1972. Le vocabulaire latin des relations et des partis politique sous la république. 2nd edn. Paris. 1st edn. 1963.
Hermon, E. 1982. ‘La place de la loi curiate dans l’histoire constitutionelle de la fin de la République romaine’, Ktema 7: 297–307.
Hiebel, D. 2009. Rôles institutionnel et politique de la contio sous la république romaine (287 – 49 av. J.-C.). Paris.
Hinard, F. 1985. Les proscriptions de la Rome républicaine. Paris – Rome.
Hölkeskamp, K.-J. 1990. ‘Senat und Volkstribunat im frühen 3. Jh. v. Chr.’, in Staat und Staatlichkeit in der frühen römischen Republik, ed. Eder, W.. Stuttgart: 437–57. Repr. 2004. Senatus populusque Romanus. Die politische Kultur der Republik – Dimensionen und Deutungen. Stuttgart: 85–103.
Hölkeskamp, K.-J. 1993. ‘Conquest, competition and consensus: Roman expansion in Italy and the rise of the nobilitas’, Historia 42: 12–39.
Hölkeskamp, K.-J. 1994. Review of N. S. Rosenstein, Imperatores Victi. Military Defeat and Aristocratic Competition in the Middle and Late Republic, Gnomon 66: 332–41.
Hölkeskamp, K.-J. 1995. ‘Oratoris maxima scaena: Reden vor dem Volk in der politischen Kultur der Republik’, in Demokratie in Rom? Die Rolle des Volkes in der Politik der römischen Republik, ed. Jehne, M.. Historia Einzelschriften 96. Stuttgart: 11–49. Repr. 2004. Senatus populusque Romanus. Die politische Kultur der Republik – Dimensionen und Deutungen. Stuttgart: 219–56.
Hölkeskamp, K.-J. 1996. ‘Exempla und mos maiorum: Überlegungen zum kollektiven Gedächnis der Nobilität’, in Vergangenheit und Lebenswelt. Soziale Kommunikation, Traditionsbildung und Historisches Bewusstsein, ed. Gehrke, H.-J. and Möller, A.. Tübingen: 301–38. Repr. 2004. Senatus populusque Romanus. Die politische Kultur der Republik – Dimensionen und Deutungen. Stuttgart: 169–98.
Hölkeskamp, K.-J. 2000. ‘The Roman Republic: government of the people, by the people, for the people?’, SCI 19: 203–23.
Hölkeskamp, K.-J. 2004. Senatus populusque Romanus. Die politische Kultur der Republik – Dimensionen und Deutungen. Stuttgart.
Hölkeskamp, K.-J. 2006. ‘Konsens und Konkurrenz. Die politische Kultur der römischen Republik in neuer Sicht’, Klio 88: 360–96.
Hölkeskamp, K.-J. 2008. ‘Hierarchie und Konsens. Pompae in der politischen Kultur der römischen Republik’, in Machtfragen. Zur kulturellen Repräsentation und Konstruktion von Macht in Antike, Mittelalter und Neuzeit, ed. Arweiler, A. H. and Gauly, B. M.. Stuttgart: 79–126.
Hölkeskamp, K.-J. 2009. ‘Eine politische Kultur (in) der Krise? Gemässigt radikale Vorbemerkungen zum kategorischen Imperativ der Konzepte’, in Eine politische Kultur (in) der Krise? Die “letzte Generation” der römischen Republik, ed. Hölkeskamp, K.-J. and Müller-Luckner, E.. Munich: 1–25.
Hölkeskamp, K.-J. 2010. Reconstructing the Roman Republic. An Ancient Political Culture and Modern Research. Rev. edn., transl. Heitmann-Gordon, H.. Princeton. 1st edn. 2004.
Hölkeskamp, K.-J. 2011. Die Entstehung der Nobilität. 2nd edn. Stuttgart. 1st edn. 1987.
Hölkeskamp, K.-J. and Müller-Luckner, E. eds. 2009. Eine politische Kultur (in) der Krise? Die “letzte Generation” der römischen Republik. Munich.
Hölkeskamp, K.-J. and Stein-Hölkeskamp, E. eds. 2000. Von Romulus zu Augustus. Grosse Gestalten der römischen Republik. Munich.
Holleran, C. 2011. ‘Migration and the urban economy of Rome’, in Demography and the Graeco-Roman World, ed. Holleran, C. and Pudsey, A.. Cambridge: 155–80.
Holleran, C. 2012. Shopping in Ancient Rome. Oxford.
Hölscher, T. 1978. ‘Die Anfänge der römischen Repräsentationskunst’, MDAI(R) 85: 315–57.
Hölscher, T. 2001. ‘Die Alten vor Augen. Politische Denkmäler und öffentliches Gedächnis im republikanischen Rom’, in Institutionalität und Symbolisierung. Verstetigungen kultureller Ordnungsmuster in Vergangenheit und Gegenwart, ed. Melville, G.. Cologne: 183–211.
Hopkins, K. 1978. Conquerors and Slaves. Cambridge.
Hopkins, K. 1983. Death and Renewal. Cambridge.
Hopkins, K. 1991. ‘From violence to blessing: symbols and rituals in ancient Rome’, in City States in Classical Antiquity and Medieval Italy, ed. Molho, A., Raaflaub, K. and Emlen, J.. Ann Arbor – Stuttgart: 479–98.
Hopkins, K. and Burton, G. 1983. ‘Political succession in the late Republic (249–50 BC)’, in Death and Renewal. Cambridge: 31–119.
Humm, M. 2000. ‘Spazio e tempo civici: riforma delle tribù e riforma del calendario alla fine del quarto secolo a.C.’, in The Roman Middle Republic. Religion, Politics, and Historiography c. 400 – 133 B.C., ed. Bruun, C.. Acta Instituti Romani Finlandiae 23. Rome: 91–119.
Humm, M. 2005. Appius Claudius Caecus. La république accomplie. Rome.
Humm, M. 2012. ‘The curiate law and the religious nature of the power of Roman magistrates’, in Law and Religion in the Roman Republic, ed. Tellegen-Couperus, O.. Leiden: 57–84.
Hurlet, F. 2012. ‘Démocratie à Rome? Quelle démocratie? En relisant Millar (et Hölkeskamp)’, in Rome, a City and Its Empire in Perspective. The Impact of the Roman World through Fergus Millar’s Research, ed. Benoist, S.. Leiden: 19–43.
Jehne, M. 1993. ‘Geheime Abstimmung und Bindungswesen in der römischen Republik’, HZ 257: 593–613.
Jehne, M. 1995a. ‘Einführung: Zur Debatte um die Rolle des Volkes in der römischen Republik’, in Demokratie in Rom? Die Rolle des Volkes in der Politik der römischen Republik, ed. Jehne, M.. Historia Einzelschriften 96. Stuttgart: 1–9.
Jehne, M. 1995b. ‘Die Beeinflussung von Entscheidungen durch “Bestechung”: zur Funktion des ambitus in der römischen Republik’, in Demokratie in Rom? Die Rolle des Volkes in der Politik der römischen Republik, ed. Jehne, M.. Historia Einzelschriften 96. Stuttgart: 51–76.
Jehne, M. 2000a. ‘Wirkungsweise und Bedeutung der centuria praerogativa’, Chiron 30: 661–78.
Jehne, M. 2000b. ‘Jovialität und Freiheit. Zur Institutionalität der Beziehungen zwischen Ober- und Unterschichten in der römischen Republik’, in Mos Maiorum. Untersuchungen zu den Formen der Identitätsstiftung und Stabilisierung in der römischen Republik, ed. Linke, B. and Stemmler, M.. Historia Einzelschriften 141. Stuttgart: 207–35.
Jehne, M. 2000c. ‘Rednertätigkeit und Statusdissonanzen in der späten römischen Republik’, in Rede und Redner. Bewertung und Darstellung in den antiken Kulturen, ed. Neumeister, C. and Raeck, W.. Möhnesee: 167–89.
Jehne, M. 2001. ‘Integrationsrituale in der römischen Republik. Zur einbindenden Wirkung der Volksversammlungen’, in Integrazione Mescolanza Rifiuto. Incontri di popoli, lingue e culture in Europa dall’Antichità all’Umanesimo, ed. Urso, G.. Rome: 89–113. Repr. 2003. Sinn (in) der Antike. Orientierungssysteme, Leitbilder und Wertkonzepte im Altertum, ed. K.-J. Hölkeskamp, J. Rüsen, and E. Stein-Hölkeskamp. Mainz: 279–97.
Jehne, M. 2005. ‘Die Volksversammlungen in Mommsens Staatsrecht, oder: Mommsen als Gesetzgeber’, in Theodor Mommsens langer Schatten. Das römische Staatsrecht als bleibende Herausforderung für die Forschung, ed. Nippel, W. and Seidensticker, B.. Hildesheim: 131–60.
Jehne, M. 2006a. ‘Who attended Roman assemblies? Some remarks on political participation in the Roman Republic’, in Repúblicas y ciudadanos. Modelos de participación cívica en el mundo antiguo, ed. Simón, F. Marco, Pina Polo, F., and Remesal Rodriguez, J.. Barcelona: 221–234.
Jehne, M. 2006b. ‘Römer, Latiner und Bundesgenossen im Krieg. Zu Formen und Ausmass der Integration in der republikanischen Armee’, in Herrschaft ohne Integration? ed. Jehne, M. and Pfeilschifter, R.. Frankfurt a. M.: 243–67.
Jehne, M. 2006c. ‘Methods, models and historiography’, in A Companion to the Roman Republic, ed. Rosenstein, N. and Morstein-Marx, R.. Oxford: 3–28.
Jehne, M. 2009a. ‘Caesar’s Alternative(n). Das Ende der römischen Republik zwischen autonomen Prozess und Betriebsunfall’, in Eine politische Kultur (in) der Krise? Die “letzte Generation” der römischen Republik, ed. Hölkeskamp, K.-J. and Müller-Luckner, E.. Munich: 141–60.
Jehne, M. 2009b. Der Grosse Trend, der kleine Sachzwang und das handelde Individuum. Caesars Entscheidungen. Munich.
Jehne, M. 2010. ‘Die Dominanz des Vorgangs über den Ausgang. Struktur und Verlauf der Wahlen in der römischen Republik’, in Technik und Symbolik vormoderner Wahlverfahren, ed. Dartmann, C., Wassilowsky, G., and Weller, T.. HZ Beiheft 52. Munich: 17–34.
Jehne, M. 2011. ‘Blaming the people in front of the people. Restraint and outbursts of orators in Roman contiones’, in Praise and Blame in Roman Republican Rhetoric, ed. Smith, C. and Corvino, R.. Swansea: 111–25.
Jehne, M. 2013a. ‘Politische Partizipation in der römischen Republik’, in Politische Partizipation. Idee und Wirklichkeit von der Antike bis in die Gegenwart, ed. Reinau, H. and von Ungern-Sternberg, J.. Berlin: 103–44.
Jehne, M. 2013b. ‘Konsensfiktionen in römischen Volksversammlungen’, in Genesis und Dynamiken der Mehrheitsentscheidung, ed. Flaig, E. and Müller-Luckner, E.. Munich: 129–52.
Jehne, M. 2013c. ‘Der römische Senat als Hüter des Gemeinsinns’, in Gemeinsinn und Gemeinwohl in der römischen Antike, ed. Jehne, M. and Lundgreen, C.. Stuttgart: 23–50.
Jehne, M. 2013d. ‘Feeding the plebs with words: the significance of senatorial public oratory in the small world of Roman politics’, in Community and Communication. Oratory and Politics in Republican Rome, ed. Steel, C. and Van der Blom, H.. Oxford: 49–62.
Jehne, M. 2014a. ‘Gerechtigkeitskonkurrenzen in der politischen Praxis der römischen Republik’, in Gerechtigkeit, ed. Melville, G., Vogt-Spira, G., Breitenstein, M.. Cologne – Weimar – Vienna: 58–73.
Jehne, M. 2014b. ‘Das Volk als Institution und als diskursive Bezugsgrösse in der römischen Republik’, in Staatlichkeit in Rom? Diskurse und Praxis (in) der römischen Republik, ed. Lundgreen, C.. Stuttgart: 117–37.
Jehne, M. ed. 1995c. Demokratie in Rom? Die Rolle des Volkes in der Politik der römischen Republik. Historia Einzelschriften 96. Stuttgart.
Johnson, T. and Dandeker, C. 1989. ‘Patronage: relation and system’, in Patronage in Ancient Society, ed. Wallace-Hadrill, A.. London – New York: 219–42.
Kaster, R. A. 2006. Marcus Tullius Cicero. Speech on Behalf of Publius Sestius. Oxford.
Keaveney, A. 2005. Sulla. The Last Republican. 2nd edn. London – New York. 1st edn. 1982.
Kloft, H. 1977. Prorogation und ausserordentliche Imperien 326–81 v. Chr. Untersuchungen zur Verfassung der römischen Republik. Meisenheim am Glan.
Kneissl, P. and Losemann, V. eds. 1998. Imperium Romanum. Studien zu Geschichte und Rezeption. Festschrift für Karl Christ zum 75. Geburtstag. Stuttgart.
Kruschwitz, P. 2002. Carmina Saturnia Epigraphica. Einleitung, Text und Kommentar zu den saturnischen Versinschriften. Hermes Einzelschriften 84. Stuttgart.
Kunkel, W. 1973. An Introduction to Roman Legan and Constitutional History. 2nd edn., transl. Kelly, J. M.. Oxford. 1st English edn. 1966; 6th German edn. 1972.
Laurence, R. 1994. ‘Rumour and communication in Roman politics’, G&R 41: 62–74.
Levick, B. 1981. ‘Professio’, Athenaeum 59: 378–88.
Levick, B. 1982. ‘Morals, politics and the fall of the Roman Republic’, G&R 29: 53–62.
Ligt, L. 2012. Peasants, Citizens and Soldiers. Studies in the Demographic History of Roman Italy 225 BC – AD 100. Cambridge.
Linderski, J. 1990. ‘The auspices and the Struggle of the Orders’, in Staat und Staatlichkeit in der frühen römischen Republik, ed. Eder, W.. Stuttgart: 34–48.
Linderski, J. ed. 1996. Imperium sine fine. T. Robert S. Broughton and the Roman Republic. Historia Einzelschriften 105. Stuttgart.
Linderski, J. and Kaminska-Linderski, A. 1973. ‘A. Gabinius A.f. Capito and the first voter in the legislative comitia tribute’, ZPE 12: 247–52.
Linke, B. 1995. Von der Verwandtschaft zum Staat. Die Entstehung politischer Organisationsformen in der frührömischen Geschichte. Stuttgart.
Linke, B. 2005. Die römische Republik von den Gracchus bis Sulla. Darmstadt.
Linke, B. 2010. Review of M. Rieger, Tribus und Stadt. Die Entstehung der römischen Walhbezirke im urbanen und mediterranen Kontext (ca. 750–450 v. Chr.), Gnomon 82: 177–9.
Linke, B. and Stemmler, M. eds. 2000. Mos Maiorum. Untersuchungen zu den Formen der Identitätsstiftung und Stabilisierung in der römischen Republik. Historia Einzelschriften 141. Stuttgart.
Lintott, A. W. 1987. ‘Democracy in the Middle Republic’, ZRG 104: 34–52.
Lintott, A. W. 1990. ‘Electoral bribery in the Roman Republic’, JRS 80: 1–16.
Lintott, A. W. 1994. ‘The crisis of the Republic: sources and source-problems’, CAH IX. Cambridge: 1–15.
Lintott, A. W. 1997. ‘The theory of the mixed constitution at Rome’, in Philosophia Togata II: Plato and Aristotle at Rome, ed. Barnes, J. and Griffin, M.. Oxford: 70–85.
Lintott, A. W. 1999. The Constitution of the Roman Republic. Oxford.
Lo Cascio, E. 1997. ‘Le procedure di recensus dalla tarda repubblica al tardo antico e il calcolo della popolazione di Roma’, in La Rome impériale. Démographie et logistique. Collection de l’École française de Rome 230. Rome: 1–76.
Lovano, M. 2002. The Age of Cinna. Crucible of Late Republican Rome. Historia Einzelschriften 158. Stuttgart.
Luisi, N. D. 1995. ‘Sul problema delle tabelle di voto nelle votazioni legislative: contributo all’interpretazione di Cic. “ad Att.” 1,14,5’, Index 23: 419–51.
Lundgreen, C. 2009a. ‘Geheim(nisvoll)e Abstimmung in Rom’, Historia 58: 36–70.
Lundgreen, C. 2009b. Regelkonflikte in der römischen Republik. Geltung und Gewichtung von Normen in politischen Entscheidungsprozessen. Historia Einzelschriften 221. Stuttgart.
Lundgreen, C. 2014a. ‘Gesetze und die Grenzen ihrer Geltung: leges und konkurrierende Normen in der römischen Republik’, in Gesetzgebung und politische Kultur in der römischen Republik, ed. Walter, U.. Heidelberg: 108–67.
Lundgreen, C. 2014b. ‘Staatsdiskurse in Rom? Staatlichkeit als analytische Kategorie für die römische Republik’, in Staatlichkeit in Rom? Diskurse und Praxis (in) der römischen Republik, ed. Lundgreen, C.. Stuttgart: 15–61.
Lundgreen, C. ed. 2014c. Staatlichkeit in Rom? Diskurse und Praxis (in) der römischen Republik. Stuttgart.
Mackie, N. 1992. ‘Popularis ideology and popular politics at Rome in the first centuries B.C.’, RhM 135: 49–73.
MacMullen, R. 1980. ‘How many Romans voted?’ Athenaeum 58: 454–7.
Malkin, I. and Rubinsohn, Z. W. eds. 1995. Leaders and Masses in the Roman World. Studies in Honor of Zvi Yavetz. Leiden – New York – Köln.
Marco Simón, F., Pina Polo, F., and Remesal Rodríguez, J. eds. 2012. Vae victis! Perdedores en el mundo antiguo. Barcelona.
Marcone, A. 2005. ‘Tra antico e moderno. Democrazia e democrazie’, in Storia romana e storia moderna. Fasi in prospettiva, ed. Pani, M.. Bari: 85–100.
Marshall, A. J. 1984. ‘Symbols and showmanship in Roman public life: the fasces’, Phoenix 38: 120–41.
Marshall, B. A. 1984. ‘Faustus Sulla and political labels in the 60’s and 50’s B. C.’, Historia 33: 199–219.
Marshall, B. A. 1997. ‘Libertas populi: the introduction of secret ballot in Rome and its depiction on coinage’, Antichthon 31: 54–73.
Mayer, E. 2012. The Ancient Middle Classes. Cambridge, MA.
McCall, J. B. 2002. The Cavalry of the Roman Republic. London – New York.
Meier, C. 1956. ‘Praerogativa centuria’, RE suppl. 8: 567–98.
Meier, C. 1965. ‘Populares’, RE suppl. 10: 549–615.
Meier, C. 1968. ‘Die loca intercessionis bei Rogationen’, MH 25: 88–100.
Meier, C. 1980. Res publica amissa. 2nd edn. Frankfurt. 1st edn. 1966.
Meier, C. 1990. ‘C. Caesar Divi filius and the formation of the alternative in Rome’, in Between Republic and Empire. Interpretations of Augustus and His Principate, ed. Raaflaub, K. A. and Toher, M.. Berkeley: 54–70.
Meier, C. 1997. ‘Der griechische und der römische Bürger. Gemeinsamkeiten und Unterschiede im Ensemble gesellschaftlicher Bedingungen’, in Griechenland und Rom. Vergleichende Untersuchungen zu Entwicklungstendenzen und –höhepunkten der antiken Geschichte, Kunst und Literatur, ed. Schmidt, E. G.. Tbilisi – Erlangen – Jena: 41–66.
Meissner, B. 2000. ‘Gaius Flaminius – oder: wie ein Aussenseiter zum Sündenbock wurde’, in Von Romulus zu Augustus. Grosse Gestalten der römischen Republik, ed. Hölkeskamp, K.-J. and Stein-Hölkeskamp, E.. Munich: 92–105.
Melville, G. ed. 2009. Institutionalität und Symbolisierung. Verstetigungen kultureller Ordnungsmuster in Vergangenheit und Gegenwart. Cologne.
Meyer, E. 1961. Römischer Staat und Staatsgedanke. 2nd edn. Zürich – Stuttgart. 1st edn. 1948.
Millar, F. 1984. ‘The political character of the classical Roman Republic, 200–151 B.C.’, JRS 74: 1–19.
Millar, F. 1986. ‘Politics, persuasion and the people before the Social War (150–90 B.C.)’ JRS 76: 1–11.
Millar, F. 1989. ‘Political power in mid-Republican Rome: Curia or Comitium?’ JRS 79: 138–50.
Millar, F. 1995. ‘Popular politics at Rome in the late Republic’, in Leaders and Masses in the Roman World. Studies in Honor of Zvi Yavetz, ed. Malkin, I. and Rubinsohn, Z. W.. Leiden – New York – Köln: 91–113.
Millar, F. 1998. The Crowd in Rome in the Late Republic. Michigan.
Mitchell, R. E. 1990. Patricians and Plebeians. The Origins of the Roman State. Ithaca, NY – London.
Molho, A., Raaflaub, K., and Emlen, J.. eds. 1991. City States in Classical Antiquity and Medieval Italy. Ann Arbor – Stuttgart.
Mommsen, Th. 1854–5. Römische Geschichte. Leipzig.
Mommsen, Th. 1887. Römisches Staatsrecht. Leipzig.
Moreau, P. 2003. ‘Donner la parole au peuple? Rhétorique et manipulation des contiones à la fin de la République romaine’, in Argumentation et discours politique. Antiquité grecque et latine, Révolution française, Monde contemporain, ed. Bonnafous, S., Chiron, P., Ducard, D., and Levy, C.. Rennes: 175–89.
Morel, J.-P. 1987. ‘La topographie de l’artisanat et du commerce dans la Rome antique’, in L’urbs. Espace urbain et histoire Ier avant J.-C. – IIIe siècle après J.-C. Collection de l’École française de Rome 98. Rome: 127–55.
Morley, N. 2009. ‘The poor in the city of Rome’, in Poverty in the Roman World, ed. Atkins, M. and Osborne, R.. Cambridge: 21–39.
Morstein-Marx, R. 1998. ‘Publicity, popularity and patronage in the commentariolum petitionis’, ClAnt 17: 259–88.
Morstein-Marx, R. 2004. Mass Oratory and Political Power in the Late Roman Republic. Cambridge.
Morstein-Marx, R. 2013. ‘“Cultural hegemony” and the communicative power of the Roman elite’, in Community and Communication. Oratory and Politics in Republican Rome, ed. Steel, C. and Van der Blom, H.. Oxford: 29–47.
Morstein-Marx, R. and Rosenstein, N. 2010. ‘The transformation of the Republic’, in A Companion to the Roman Republic, ed. Rosenstein, N. and Morstein-Marx, R.. Oxford: 625–37.
Mouritsen, H. 1998. Italian Unification. A Study in Ancient and Modern Historiography, BICS Suppl. 70. London.
Mouritsen, H. 2001. Plebs and Politics in the Late Roman Republic. Cambridge.
Mouritsen, H. 2004. ‘Pits and politics: interpreting colonial fora in republican Italy’, PBSR 72: 37–67.
Mouritsen, H. 2005. ‘Review of R. Morstein-Marx, Mass Oratory and Political Power in the Late Roman Republic’, JRS 95: 251–2.
Mouritsen, H. 2011a. ‘Lottery and elections: containing elite competition in Venice and Rome’, in Competition in the Ancient World, ed. Fisher, N. and van Wees, H.. Swansea: 221–38.
Mouritsen, H. 2011b. The Freedman in the Roman World. Cambridge.
Mouritsen, H. 2012. ‘Review of E. Mayer, The Ancient Middle Classes: Urban Life and Aesthetics in the Roman Empire, 100 BCE-250 CE’, BMCR 9: 40.
Mouritsen, H. 2013. ‘From meeting to text: the contio in the late Republic’, in Community and Communication. Oratory and Politics in Republican Rome, ed. Steel, C. and Van der Blom, H.. Oxford: 63–82.
Mouritsen, H. 2014. ‘Pagane Lebensmodelle? Gods, pietas, and the Roman maiores’, in Der Mensch zwischen Weltflucht und Verantwortung. Lebensmodelle der paganen und der jüdisch-christlischen Antike, ed. Nesselrath, H.-G. and Rühl, M.. Tübingen: 47–62.
Mouritsen, H. 2015a. ‘The incongruence of power: the Roman constitution in theory and practice’, in A Companion to Greek Democracy and the Roman Republic, ed. Hammer, D.. Oxford: 146–63.
Mouritsen, H. 2015b. ‘Status and social hierarchies: the case of Pompeii’, in Social Status and Prestige in the Roman World, ed. Kuhn, A.. Stuttgart: 87–114.
Mouritsen, H. 2015c. ‘New Pompeian graffiti and the limits of Roman literacy’, in Antike. Kultur. Geschichte. Festschrift für Inge Nielsen zum 65. Geburstag, ed. Faust, S., Seifert, M., and Ziemer, L.. Aachen: 201–14.
Mouritsen, H. 2017. ‘Cicero’s familia urbana and the social structure of late Republican Rome’, in Politische Kultur und soziale Struktur der römischen Republik, ed. Harders, A.-C. and Haake, M.. Stuttgart: 215–30.
Nicholls, J. J. 1956. ‘The reform of the comitia centuriata’, AJPh 77: 225–54.
Nicholls, J. J. 1967. ‘The content of the lex curiata’, AJPh 88: 257–78.
Nicolet, C. 1959. ‘“Confusio suffragiorum”. A propos d’une réforme électorale de Caius Gracchus’, MEFRA 71: 145–210.
Nicolet, C. 1970. ‘Le livre III des Res Rusticae de Varron et les allusions au déroulement des comices tributes’, REA 72: 113–37.
Nicolet, C. 1973. ‘Polybe et les institutions romaines’, in Polybe, ed. Gabba, E.. Fondation Hardt, Entretiens sur l’antitquité classique 20. Vandoeuvres – Genève: 209–58.
Nicolet, C. 1980. The World of the Citizen in Republican Rome. Transl. Falla, P. S.. London. 1st edn. 1976.
Nicolet, C. 1983. ‘Polybe et la “constitution” de Rome: aristocratie et démocratie’, in Demokratia et aristokratia. À propos de Caius Graccuhs: mots grecs et réalités romaines, ed. Nicolet, C.. Paris: 15–35.
Nielsen, I. and Poulsen, B. 1992. The Temple of Castor and Pollux I. Rome.
Nippel, W. 1980. Mischverfassungstheorie und Verfassungsrealität in antike und früher Neuzeit. Stuttgart.
Nippel, W. 1981. ‘Die Plebs urbana und die Rolle der Gewalt in der späten römischen Republik’, in Von Elend der Handarbeit, ed. Mommsen, H. and Schulze, W.. Stuttgart: 70–92.
Nippel, W. 1988. Aufruhr und ‘Polizei’ in der römischen Republik. Stuttgart.
Nippel, W. 1995. Public Order in Ancient Rome. Cambridge.
Nippel, W. and Seidensticker, B. eds. 2005. Theodor Mommsens langer Schatten. Das römische Staatsrecht als bleibende Herausforderung für die Forschung. Hildesheim.
North, J. A. 1981. ‘The development of Roman imperialism’, JRS 71: 1–9.
North, J. A. 1990. ‘Politics and Aristocracy in the Roman Republic’, P&P 126: 3–21.
North, J. A. 2002. ‘Introduction: Pursuing Democracy’, in Representations of Empire. Rome and the Mediterranean World, ed. Bowman, A. K. et al. Oxford: 1–12.
North, J. A. 2007. ‘The constitution of the Roman Republic’, in A Companion to the Roman Republic, ed. Rosenstein, N. and Morstein-Marx, R.. Oxford: 256–77.
Oakley, S. 1993. ‘The Roman conquest of Italy’, in War and Society in the Roman World, ed. Rich, J. and Shipley, G.. London: 9–37.
Ostwald, M. 2000. Oligarchia. The Development of a Constitutional Form in Ancient Greece. Historia Einzelschriften 144. Stuttgart.
Paananen, U. 1972. Sallust’s Politico-Social Terminology. Helsinki.
Paananen, U. 1993. ‘Legislation in the comitia centuriata’, in Senatus Populusque Romanus. Studies in Roman Republican Legislation, ed. Vaahtera, J.. Acta Instituti Romani Finlandiae 13. Rome: 9–73.
Palmer, R. E. A. 1970. The Archaic Community of the Romans. Cambridge.
Pani, M. 1997. La politica in Roma antica: cultura e prassi. Rome.
Papi, E. 2002. ‘La turba inpia: artigiani e commercianti del Foro Romano e dintorni (I sec. a.C. – 64 d.C.)’, JRA 15: 45–62.
Patterson, J. R. 1999. Political Life in the City of Rome. London.
Perelli, L. 1982. Il movimento popolare nell’ultimo secolo della repubblica. Torino.
Perl, G. and El-Qalqili, I. 2002. ‘Zur Problematik der lex Oppia (215/195 v. Chr.)’, Klio 84: 414–39.
Pfeilschifter, R. 2005. Titus Quinctius Flamininus. Untersuchungen zur römischen Griechenlandpolitik. Hypomnemata 162. Göttingen.
Phillips, D. A. 2004. ‘Voter turnout in consular elections’, AHB 18: 48–60.
Pina Polo, F. 1995. ‘Procedures and Functions of Civil and Military Contiones in Rome’, Klio 77: 203–16.
Pina Polo, F. 1996. Contra arma verbis. Der Redner vor dem Volk in der späten römischen Republik. HABES 22. Heidelberg.
Pina Polo, F. 2011. The Consuls at Rome. The Civil Functions of the Consuls in the Roman Republic. Cambridge.
Pina Polo, F. 2012. ‘Veteres candidate: losers in the elections in Republican Rome’, in Vae victis! Perdedores en el mundo antiguo, ed. Marco Simón, F., Pina Polo, F., and Remesal Rodríguez, J.. Barcelona: 63–82.
Pittinger, M. R. P. 2008. Contested Triumphs: Politics, Pageantry, and Performance in Livy’s Republican Rome. Berkeley.
Polverini, L. 2005. ‘Democrazia a Roma? La costituzione repubblicana secondo Polibio’, in Popolo e potere nel mondo antico, ed. Urso, G.. Pisa: 85–96.
Powell, J. G. F. 1990. ‘The tribune Sulpicius’, Historia 39: 446–60.
Prugni, G. 1987. ‘Quirites’, Athenaeum 65: 127–61.
Raaflaub, K. A. 1991. ‘City-state, territory and empire in classical antiquity’, in City States in Classical Antiquity and Medieval Italy, ed. Molho, A., Raaflaub, K., and Emlen, J.. Ann Arbor – Stuttgart: 565–88.
Raaflaub, K. A. 1993. ‘Politics and society in fifth-century Rome’, in Bilancio critico su Roma arcaica fra monarchia e repubblica. In memoria di Ferdinando Castagnoli. Atti dei convegni Lincei 100. Rome: 129–57.
Raaflaub, K. A. 2005. ‘The conflict of the orders in archaic Rome: a comprehensive and comparative approach’, in Social Struggles in Archaic Rome. New Perspectives on the Conflict of the Orders, ed. Raaflaub, K. A.. 2nd edn. Berkeley: 1–46. 1st edn. 1986.
Rathbone, D. W. 1993. ‘The census qualifications of the assidui and the prima classis’, in De Agricultura: In Memoriam Pieter Willem de Neeve, ed. Sancisi-Weerdenburg, H. et al. Amsterdam: 121–52.
Rich, J. W. 1976. Declaring War in the Roman Republic in the Period of Transmarine Expansion. Brussels.
Rich, J. W. 2012. ‘Roman attitudes to defeat in battle under the Republic’, in Vae victis! Perdedores en el mundo antiguo, ed. Marco Simón, F., Pina Polo, F., and Remesal Rodríguez, J.. Barcelona: 83–111.
Richardson, J. H. 2008. ‘Ancient historical thought and the development of the consulship (1)’, Latomus 67: 328–41, 627–33.
Rieger, M. 2007. Tribus und Stadt. Die Entstehung der römischen Wahlbezirke im urbane und mediterranen Kontext (ca. 750–450 v. Chr.). Göttingen.
Rilinger, R. 1976. Der Einfluss des Wahlleiters bei den römischen Konsulwahlen von 366 bis 50 v. Chr. Vestigia 24. Munich.
Rilinger, R. 1982. ‘Die Interpretation des Niedergangs der römischen Republik durch “Revolution” und “Krise ohne Alternative”’, AKG 64: 279–306.
Rilinger, R. 1989. ‘“Loca intercessionis” und legalismus in der späten Republik’, Chiron 19: 481–98.
Ritter, H.-W. 1998. ‘Zu Libertas und den Tabellargesetzen in der republikanischen Münzprägung’, in Imperium Romanum. Studien zu Geschichte und Rezeption. Festschrift für Karl Christ zum 75. Geburtstag, ed. Kneissl, P. and Losemann, V.. Stuttgart: 608–14.
Robb, M. A. 2010. Beyond Populares and Optimates. Political Language in the Late Republic. Historia Einzelschriften 213. Stuttgart.
Robinson, A. 1994. ‘Cicero’s use of the Gracchi in two speeches before the people’, A&R 39: 71–6.
Roddaz, J.-M. 2005. ‘Popularis, populisme, popularité’, in Popolo e potere nel mondo antico, ed. Urso, G.. Pisa: 97–122.
Rogers, G. M. 2002. ‘Polybius was right’, in Millar, F., Rome, the Greek World, and the East I. The Roman Republic and the Augustan Revolution, ed. Rogers, G. M. and Cotton, H. M.. Chapel Hill – London: IX–XVI.
Rosenstein, N. 1990a. Imperatores Victi. Military Defeat and Aristocratic Competition in the Middle and Late Republic. Berkeley – Los Angeles – Oxford.
Rosenstein, N. 1990b. ‘War, failure, and aristocratic competition’, CPh 85: 255–65.
Rosenstein, N. 1995. ‘Sorting out the lot in Republican Rome’, AJP 116: 43–75.
Rosenstein, N. and Morstein-Marx, R. eds. 2006. A Companion to the Roman Republic. Oxford.
Rosillo-López, C. 2010. La corruption à la fin de la République romaine (IIe – Ier s. av. J.-C.). Aspects politiques et financiers. Historia Einzelschriften 200. Stuttgart.
Rüpke, J. 1990. Domi Militiae: die religiöse Konstruktion des Krieges in Rome. Stuttgart.
Russell, A. 2013. ‘Speech, competition, and collaboration: tribunician politics and the development of popular ideology’, in Community and Communication. Oratory and Politics in Republican Rome, ed. Steel, C. and Van der Blom, H.. Oxford: 101–15.
Ryan, F. X. 1994. ‘The praetorship of Favonius’, AJP 115: 587–601.
Ryan, F. X. 1995. ‘Sexagenarians, the bridge and the centuria praerogativa’, RhM 138: 188–90.
Ryan, F. X. 1998. Rank and Participation in the Republican Senate. Stuttgart.
Ryan, F. X. 2001. ‘Knappe Mehrheiten bei der Wahl zum Konsul’, Klio 83: 402–24.
Sandberg, K. 1993. ‘The concilium plebis as a legislative body during the Republic’, in Senatus Populusque Romanus. Studies in Roman Republican Legislation, ed. Vaahtera, J.. Acta Instituti Romani Finlandiae 13. Rome: 74–96.
Sandberg, K. 2000. ‘Tribunician and non-tribunician legislation in mid-Republican Rome’, in The Roman Middle Republic. Religion, Politics, and Historiography c. 400 – 133 B.C., ed. Bruun, C.. Acta Instituti Romani Finlandiae 23. Rome: 121–40.
Sandberg, K. 2001. Magistrates and Assemblies. A Study of Legislative Practice in Republican Rome. Acta Instituti Romani Finlandiae 24. Rome.
Sandberg, K. 2004. ‘Consular legislation in pre-Sullan Rome’, Arctos 38: 133–62.
Santalucia, B. 2012. ‘Le clausole autoprotettive delle leges’, in Leges publicae. La legge nell’esperienza giuridica romana, ed. Ferrary, J.-L.. Pavia: 116–37.
Santangelo, F. 2006. ‘Sulla and the Senate: a reconsideration’, CCG 17: 7–22
Santangelo, F. 2008. ‘Cicero and Marius’, Athenaeum 96: 597–607.
Santangelo, F. 2014. ‘Roman politics in the 70s B.C.: a story of realignments?’ JRS 1–27.
Scheid, J. 2003. An Introduction to Roman Religion. 2nd edn. Edinburgh. 1st edn. 1998.
Scheidel, W. 2004. ‘Human mobility in Roman Italy, 1: the free population’, JRS 94: 1–26.
Scheidel, W. and Friesen, S. J. 2009. ‘The size of the economy and the distribution of income in the Roman Empire’, JRS 99: 61–91.
Schmidt, E. G. ed. 1997. Griechenland und Rom. Vergleichende Untersuchungen zu Entwicklungstendenzen und –höhepunkten der antiken Geschichte, Kunst und Literatur. Tbilisi – Erlangen – Jena.
Schofield, M. 1995. ‘Cicero’s definition of Res Publica’, in Cicero the Philosopher, ed. Powell, J. G. F.. Oxford: 63–83.
Scholz, P. 2011. Den Vätern folgen. Sozialisiation und Erziehung der republikanischen Senatsaristokratie. Berlin.
Schovánek, J. G. 1972. ‘The date of M. Octavius and his lex frumentaria’, Historia 21: 235–43.
Scobie, A. 1986. ‘Slum, Sanitation, and Mortality in the Roman World’, Klio 68: 309–433.
Seager, R. 2013. ‘Polybius’ distortions of the Roman constitution: a simpl(istic) explanation’, in Polybius and His World. Essays in Memory of F. W. Walbank, ed. Gibson, B. and Harrison, T.. Oxford: 247–54.
Shackleton Bailey, D. R. 1965–70. Letters to Atticus. Cambridge.
Shackleton Bailey, D. R. 1981. Cicero. Epistulae ad Quintum Fratrem et M. Brutum. Cambridge.
Shackleton Bailey, D. R. 1986. ‘Nobiles and novi reconsidered’, AJPh 107: 255–60.
Shatzman, I. 1975. Senatorial Wealth and Roman Politics. Brussels.
Sion-Jenkis, K. 2000. Von der Republik zum Prinzipat. Ursachen für den Vervassungsvechsel in Rom im historischen Denken der Antike. Palingenesia 69. Stuttgart.
Smith, R. E. 1957. ‘The lex Plotia agraria and Pompey’s Spanish veterans’, CQ 7: 82–5.
Spielvogel, J. 1993. Amicitia und res publica. Ciceros Maxime während der innenpolitischen Auseinandersetzungen der Jahre 59–50 v. Chr. Stuttgart.
Spielvogel, J. ed. 2002. Res publica reperta. Zur Verfassung und Gesellschaft der römischen Republik und des frühen Prinzipats. Festschrift für Jochen Bleicken zum 75. Geburtstag. Stuttgart.
Stanton, G. R. and Bicknell, P. J. 1987. ‘Voting in tribal groups in the Athenian Assembly’, GRBS 28: 51–92.
Stasse, B. 2005. ‘La loi curiate des magistrats’, RIDA 52: 375–400.
Staveley, E. S. 1953. ‘The reform of the comitia centuriata’, AJPh 74: 1–33.
Staveley, E. S. 1969. ‘The role of the first voter in the Roman legislative assemblies’, Historia 18: 513–20.
Staveley, E. S. 1972. Greek and Roman Voting and Elections. London.
Steel, C. 2013. The End of the Roman Republic, 146–44 BC. Conquest and Crisis. Edinburgh.
Steel, C. 2014. ‘Rethinking Sulla: the case of the Roman senate’, CQ 64: 657–68.
Steel, C. and Van der Blom, H. eds. 2013. Community and Communication. Oratory and Politics in Republican Rome. Oxford.
Stein-Hölkeskamp, E. 2013. ‘Macht, Memoria und Monumente: Marius, Sulla und der Kampf um den öffentlichen Raum’, Klio 95: 429–46.
Stemmler, M. 1997. Eques Romanus – Reiter und Ritter. Begriffsgeschichtliche Untersuchungen zu den Entstehungsbedingungen einer römischen Adelskategorie im Heer und in den comitia centuriata. Prismata 8. Frankfurt a. M.
Stemmler, M. 2000. ‘Die römische Manipularordnung und der Funktionswandel der Centurien’, Klio 82: 107–28.
Stemmler, M. 2001. ‘Institutionalisierte Geschichte. Zur Stabilisierungsleistung und Symbolizität historischer Beispiele in der Redekunst der römischen Republik’, in Institutionalität und Symbolisierung. Verstetigungen kultureller Ordnungsmuster in Vergangenheit und Gegenwart, ed. Melville, G.. Cologne: 219–40.
Stewart, R. 1998. Public Office in Early Rome. Ritual Procedure and Political Practice. Ann Arbor.
Strasburger, H. 1939. ‘Optimates’, RE 18.1: 773–98.
Straumann, B. 2011. ‘Constitutional thought in the late Roman republic’, HPTh 32: 280–92.
Stumpf, G. R. 1985. ‘C. Atinius C.f. Praetor in Asia 122–121 v. Chr., auf einem Kistophor’, ZPE 61: 186–90.
Syme, R. 1939. The Roman Revolution. Oxford.
Syme, R. 1964. Sallust. Berkeley.
Tan, J. 2008. ‘Contiones in the age of Cicero’, ClAnt 27: 163–201.
Tatum, W. J. 1999. The Patrician Tribune Publius Clodius Pulcher. Chapel Hill, NC – London.
Tatum, W. J. 2010. ‘The Plebiscitum Atinium once more’, in Res Historica. Terra, Mare et Homines II. Studies in Memory of Professor Tadeusz Loposzko, ed. Kowalski, H. and Madejski, P.. Lublin: 198–208.
Tatum, W. J. 2013. ‘Campaign rhetoric’, in Community and Communication. Oratory and Politics in Republican Rome, ed. Steel, C. and Van der Blom, H.. Oxford: 133–50.
Taylor, L. R. 1949. Party Politics in the Age of Caesar. Berkeley.
Taylor, L. R. 1957. ‘The centuriate assembly before and after the reform’, AJPh 78: 337–54.
Taylor, L. R. 1960. The Voting Districts of the Roman Republic. Rome.
Taylor, L. R. 1962. ‘Forerunners of the Gracchi’, JRS 52: 19–27.
Taylor, L. R. 1966. Roman Voting Assemblies. Ann Arbor.
Thommen, L. 1989. Das Volkstribunat der späten römischen Republik. Historia Einzelschriften 59. Stuttgart.
Thommen, L. 1995. ‘Les lieux de la plèbe et de ses tribuns dans la Rome républicaine’, Klio 77: 358–70.
Tiersch, C. 2009. ‘Politische Öffentlichkeit statt Mittbestimmung? Zur bedeutung der contiones in der mittleren und späten römischen Republik’, Klio 91: 40–68.
Timmer, J. 2008. Altersgrenzen politischer Partizipation in antiken Gesellschaften. Berlin.
Timmer, J. 2009. ‘Auseinandertreten, wenn alle einer Meinung sind – Überlegungen zur discessio’, Klio 91: 384–405.
Ungern-Sternberg, J. 1970. Untersuchungen zum spätrepublikanischen Notstandsrecht. Senatus consultum ultimum und hostis-Erklärung. Vestigia 11. Munich.
Ungern-Sternberg, J. 1990. ‘Die Wahrnehmung des “Ständeskampfes” in der römischen Geschichtsschreibung’, in Staat und Staatlichkeit in der frühen römischen Republik, ed. Eder, W.. Stuttgart: 92–102.
Ungern-Sternberg, J. 1991. ‘Die politische und soziale Bedeutung der spätrepublikanischen leges frumentariae’, in Nourrir la plebe, ed. Giovannini, A.. Basel: 19–41.
Ungern-Sternberg, J. 1998. ‘Die Legitimitätskrise der römischen Republik’, HZ 266: 607–24.
Ungern-Sternberg, J. 2014. ‘The crisis of the Republic’, in The Cambridge Companion to the Roman Republic, ed. Flower, H. I. 2nd edn. Cambridge: 78–98. 1st edn. 2004.
Urso, G. ed. 2005. Popolo e potere nel mondo antico. Pisa.
Vaahtera, J. 1990. ‘Pebbles, points, or ballots: the emergence of the individual vote in Rome’, Arctos 24: 161–77.
Vaahtera, J. 1993a. ‘On the religious nature of the place of assembly’, in Senatus Populusque Romanus. Studies in Roman Republican Legislation, ed. Vaahtera, J.. Acta Instituti Romani Finlandiae 13. Rome: 97–116.
Vaahtera, J. 1993b. ‘The origin of Latin suffragium’, Glotta 71: 6–80.
Vaahtera, J. ed. 1993c Senatus Populusque Romanus. Studies in Roman Republican Legislation. Acta Instituti Romani Finlandiae 13. Rome.
Vervaet, F. J. 2004. ‘The lex Valeria and Sulla’s empowerment as dictator (82–79 BCE), CCG 15: 37–84.
Vervaet, F. J. 2009. ‘Pompeius’ career from 79 to 70 BCE: constitutional, political and historical considerations’, Klio 91: 406–34.
Veyne, P. 1990. Bread and Circuses. Transl. Pearce, E.. London.
Vervaet, F. J. 2000. ‘La “plèbe moyenne” sous le Haut-Empire’, Annales (HSS) 55: 1169–99.
Vishnia, R. F. 1989. ‘Lex Atinia de tribunis plebis in senatum legendis’, MH 46: 163–76.
Vishnia, R. F. 1996. State, Society, and Popular Leaders in Mid-Republican Rome. London.
Vishnia, R. F. 1998. ‘The refusal of the centuriate assembly to declare war on Macedon (200 BC) – a reappraisal’, SCI 17: 34–44.
Vishnia, R. F. 2008. ‘Written ballot, secret ballot and the iudicia populi. A note on the leges tabellariae (Cicero, De legibus 3.33–39)’, Klio 90: 334–46.
Vlassopoulos, K. 2010. Politics: Antiquity and Its Legacy. London – New York.
Walbank, F. W. 1972. Polybius. Berkeley.
Wallace-Hadrill, A. 1989. ‘Patronage in Roman Society: from Republic to Empire’, in Patronage in Ancient Society, ed. Wallace-Hadrill, A.. London – New York: 63–87.
Wallace-Hadrill, A. 2013. ‘Trying to define and identify the Roman “middle classes”’, JRA 26: 605–9.
Wallace-Hadrill, A. ed. 1989. Patronage in Ancient Society. London – New York.
Waller, M. 2011. ‘Victory, defeat and electoral success at Rome, 343–91 B.C.’, Latomus 70: 18–38.
Wallinga, T. 1994. ‘Ambitus in the Roman Republic’, RIDA 41: 411–42.
Walter, U. 1998. ‘Der Begriff des Staates in der griechischen und römischen Geschichte’, in Althistorisches Kolloquium aus Anlass des 70. Geburtstag von Jochen Bleicken, ed. Hantos, Th. and Lehmann, G. A.. Stuttgart: 9–27.
Walter, U. 2001. ‘Die Botschaft des Mediums. Überlegungen zum Sinnpotential von Historiographie im Kontext der römischen Geschichtskultur zur Zeit der Republik’, in Institutionalität und Symbolisierung. Verstetigungen kultureller Ordnungsmuster in Vergangenheit und Gegenwart, ed. Melville, G.. Cologne: 241–79.
Walter, U. 2004. Memoria und res publica. Zur Geschichtskultur im republikanischen Rom. Frankfurt a. M.
Walter, U. 2009. ‘Struktur, Zufall, Kontingenz? Überlegungen zum ende der römischen Republik’, in Eine politische Kultur (in) der Krise? Die “letzte Generation” der römischen Republik, ed. Hölkeskamp, K.-J. and Müller-Luckner, E.. Munich: 27–51.
Walter, U. 2014a. ‘Ordnungszersetzung: der Fall der späten römsichen Republik’, in Aufruhr – Katastrophe – Konkurrenz – Zerfall. Bedrohte Ordnungen als Thema der Kulturwissenschaften, ed. Frie, E. and Meier, M.. Tübingen: 83–115.
Walter, U. 2014b. ‘Meister der Macht ohne Formierung von Staatlichkeit: die römische Aristokratie’, in Staatlichkeit in Rom? Diskurse und Praxis (in) der römischen Republik, ed. Lundgreen, C.. Stuttgart: 91–116.
Ward, A. M. 1970. ‘Politics in the trials of Manilius and Cornelius’, TAPhA 101: 545–56.
Ward, A. M. 2004. ‘How democratic was the Roman Republic?’ NECJ 31: 101–19.
Warrior, V. M. 1996. The Initiation of the Second Macedonian War. An Explication of Livy Book 31. Historia Einzeschriften 97. Stuttgart.
Welwei, K.-W. 1996. ‘Caesars Diktatur, der Prinzipat des Augustus und die Fiktion der historischen Notwendigkeit’, Gymnasium 103: 477–97.
Welwei, K.-W. 2000. ‘Lucius Iunius Brutus – ein fiktiver Revolutionsheld’, in Von Romulus zu Augustus. Grosse Gestalten der römischen Republik, ed. Hölkeskamp, K.-J. and Stein-Hölkeskamp, E.. Munich: 48–57.
Welwei, K.-W. 2002. ‘Demokratische Verfassungselemente in Rom aus der Sicht des Polybios’, in Res publica reperta. Zur Verfassung und Gesellschaft der römischen Republik und des frühen Prinzipats. Festschrift für Jochen Bleicken zum 75. Geburtstag, ed. Spielvogel, J.. Stuttgart: 25–35.
Whitehead, D. 1991. ‘Norms of citizenship in ancient Greece’, in City States in Classical Antiquity and Medieval Italy, ed. Molho, A., Raaflaub, K., and Emlen, J.. Ann Arbor – Stuttgart: 135–54.
Williamson, C. 1990. ‘The Roman aristocracy and positive law’, CPh 85: 266–76.
Williamson, C. 2005. The Laws of the Roman People. Public Law in the Expansion and Decline of the Roman Republic. Ann Arbor.
Winterling, A. 2008. ‘“Krise ohne Alternative” in alten Rom’, in Christian Meier zur Diskussion, ed. Bernett, M., Nippel, W., and Winterling, A.. Stuttgart: 219–39.
Wirszubski, C. 1950. Libertas as a Political Idea at Rome during the Late Republic and Early Principate. Cambridge.
Wiseman, T. P. 1971. New Men in the Roman Senate 139 BC-AD 14. Oxford.
Wiseman, T. P. 1985a. Catullus and His World. Cambridge.
Wiseman, T. P. 1994. ‘The senate and the populares’, CAH IX. Cambridge: 327–67.
Wiseman, T. P. 1995. Remus: A Roman Myth. Cambridge.
Wiseman, T. P. 1999. ‘Democracy alla romana’, JRA 12: 537–40.
Wiseman, T. P. 2004. The Myths of Rome. Exeter.
Wiseman, T. P. 2009. Remembering the Roman People. Essays on Late-Republican Politics and Literature. Oxford.
Wiseman, T. P. 2010. ‘The two-headed state: how Romans explained civil war’, in Citizens of Discord. Rome and Its Civil Wars, ed. Breed, B. W., Damon, C., and Rossi, A.. Oxford: 25–44.
Wiseman, T. P. ed. 1985b. Roman Political Life 90 BC – AD 69. Exeter.
Yakobson, A. 1992. ‘Petitio and Largitio: Popular Participation in the Centuriate Assembly of the Late Republic’, JRS 82: 32–52.
Yakobson, A. 1993. ‘Dionysius of Halicarnassus on a democratic change in the centuriate assembly’, SCI 12: 139–53.
Yakobson, A. 1995. ‘Secret ballot and its effect in the late Roman Republic’, Hermes 123: 126–42.
Yakobson, A. 1999. Elections and Electioneering in Rome. Historia Einzelschriften 128. Stuttgart.
Yakobson, A. 2010. ‘Traditional political culture and the people’s role in the Roman Republic’, Historia 59: 282–302.
Zecchini, G. 1997. Il pensiero politico romano. Dall’età arcaica alla tarda antichità. Rome.
Zecchini, G. 2006. ‘In margine a “Rekonstruktionen einer Republik” di K.-J. Hölkeskamp’, StudStor 47: 395–404.
Ziolkowski, A. 1992. The Temples of Mid-Republican Rome and Their Historical and Topographical Context. Rome.

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.