Ackema, Peter.
1995.
Syntax below zero. PhD dissertation,
Utrecht University.
Google Scholar
Ackema, Peter and
Ad Neeleman.
2004.
Beyond morphology: interface conditions on word formation.
Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Ackema, Peter and
Ad Neeleman.
2007. Morphology ≠ syntax. In
Gillian Ramchand and
Charles Reiss (eds.),
The Oxford handbook of linguistic interfaces, 325–52.
Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Ackerman, Farrell and
Gregory T. Stump.
2004. Paradigms and periphrastic expression: a study in realization-based lexicalism. In
Louisa Sadler and
Andrew Spencer (eds.),
Projecting morphology, 111–57.
Stanford:
CSLI Publications. Google Scholar
Ackerman, Farrell,
James P. Blevins and
Robert Malouf.
2009. Parts and wholes: implicative patterns in inflectional paradigms. In
James P. Blevins and
Juliette Blevins (eds.),
Analogy in grammar: form and acquisition, 54–82.
Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. and
R. M. W. Dixon.
1998.
Dependencies between grammatical systems.
Language 74,
56–80.
Google Scholar
Albright, Adam. 2002.
Islands of reliability for regular morphology: evidence from Italian.
Language 78,
684–709.
Google Scholar
Anderson, Stephen R. 1985. Typological distinctions in word formation. In
Timothy Shopen (ed.),
Language typology and syntactic description, vol. III: Grammatical categories and the lexicon, 30–56.
Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Anderson, Stephen R. ,
1992.
A-morphous morphology.
Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Anderson, Stephen R.,
2005.
Aspects of the theory of clitics.
Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Anderson, Stephen R.,
Lea Brown,
Alice Gaby and
Jacqueline Lecarme.
2006.
Life on the edge: there’s morphology there after all! Lingue e linguaggio 5,
33–48.
Google Scholar
Arlotto, Anthony. 1972.
Introduction to historical linguistics.
Boston:
Houghton Mifflin.
Google Scholar
Aronoff, Mark. 1976.
Word formation in generative grammar.
Cambridge, MA:
MIT Press.
Google Scholar
Aronoff, Mark. ,
1992a. Noun classes in Arapesh. In
Geert Booij and
Jaap van Marle (eds.),
Yearbook of Morphology 1991, 21–32.
Dordrecht:
Kluwer.
Google Scholar
Aronoff, Mark.,
1992b. Stems in Latin verbal morphology. In
Mark Aronoff (ed.),
Morphology now, 5–32.
Albany, NY:
State University of New York Press.
Google Scholar
Aronoff, Mark.,
1994.
Morphology by itself: stems and inflectional classes.
Cambridge, MA:
MIT Press.
Google Scholar
Baerman, Matthew.,
2007a.
Morphological reversals.
Journal of Linguistics 43.1,
33–61.
Google Scholar
Baerman, Matthew.,
2007b. Morphological typology of deponency. In Baerman
et al. (eds.), 1–19.
Google Scholar
Baerman, Matthew.,
2008.
Historical observations on defectiveness: the first singular non-past.
Russian Linguistics 37 (1),
81–97.
Google Scholar
Baerman, Matthew,
Dunstan Brown and
Greville G. Corbett.
2005.
The syntax–morphology interface: a study of syncretism.
Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Baerman, Matthew and
Greville G. Corbett.
2010. Introduction. In Baerman, Corbett and Brown (eds.), 1–18.
Google Scholar
Baerman, Matthew,
Greville G. Corbett,
Dunstan Brown and
Andrew Hippisley (eds.).
2007.
Deponency and morphological mismatches.
Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Baerman, Matthew,
Greville G. Corbett and
Dunstan Brown (eds.).
2010.
Defective paradigms: missing forms and what they tell us.
Oxford:
British Academy and Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Baker, Mark. 1985.
The mirror principle and morphosyntactic explanation.
Linguistic Inquiry 16,
373–416.
Google Scholar
Baker, Mark. 1988.
Incorporation: a theory of grammatical function changing.
University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar
Baldi, Philip. 1976.
Remarks on the Latin r-form.
Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Sprachforschung 90,
222–57.
Google Scholar
Baltin, Mark and
Chris Collins (eds.).
2007.
The handbook of contemporary syntactic theory.
Oxford:
Blackwell.
Google Scholar
Barnetová, V. et al.
1979.
Russkaja grammatika, vol. I.
Prague:
Academia Praha.
Google Scholar
Bauer, Laurie. 1990.
Be-heading the word.
Journal of Linguistics 26,
1–31.
Google Scholar
Bauer, Laurie. 2001.
Morphological productivity.
Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Bauer, Laurie.,
2005. Productivity: theories. In Štekauer and Lieber (eds.), 315–34.
Google Scholar
Bauer, Laurie.,
2009. Typology of compounds. In
Rochelle Lieber and
Pavol Štekauer (eds.),
The Oxford handbook of compounding, 343–56.
Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Beard, Robert. 1995.
Lexeme-morpheme base morphology: a general theory of inflection and word formation.
Albany, NY:
State University of New York Press.
Google Scholar
Beard, Robert. ,
1998. Derivation. In
Andrew Spencer and
Arnold Zwicky (eds.),
Handbook of morphology, 44–65.
Oxford:
Blackwell.
Google Scholar
Bleiching, Doris,
Guido Drexel and
Dafydd Gibbon.
1996. Ein Synkretismusmodell für die deutsche Morphologie. In
Dafydd Gibbon (ed.),
Natural language processing and speech technology: results of the third KONVENS conference, Bielefeld, 237–48.
Berlin:
Mouton de Gruyter.
Google Scholar
Blevins, James P. 2006.
Word-based morphology.
Journal of Linguistics 42,
531–73.
Google Scholar
Bobaljik, Jonathan David. 2002. Syncretism without paradigms: remarks on Williams. 1981. In
Geert Booij and
Jaap van Marle (eds.),
Yearbook of Morphology 2001, 53–85.
Dordrecht:
Kluwer.
Google Scholar
Bonami, Olivier and
Gilles Boyé.
2006.
Deriving inflectional irregularity. In Stefan Müller (ed.),
Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on HPSG,
Varna, 24–27 July 2006, 360–81. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Google Scholar
Bonnet, Max. 1968.
Le Latin de Grégoire de Tours. 2nd edn.
Hildesheim:
Georg Olms.
Google Scholar
Booij, Geert. 1977.
Dutch morphology. a study of word formation in generative grammar.
Dordrecht:
Foris.
Google Scholar
Booij, Geert. 1996. Inherent versus contextual inflection and the split morphology hypothesis. In
Geert Booij and
Jaap Van Marle (eds.),
Yearbook of Morphology, 1–16.
Dordrecht:
Kluwer.
Google Scholar
Booij, Geert E.,
2002.
The morphology of Dutch.
Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Booij, Geert E.,
2005. Compounding and derivation: evidence for construction morphology. In
Wolfgang Dressler,
Dieter Kastovsky,
Oskar Pfeiffer and
Franz Rainer (eds.),
Morphology and its demarcations: selected papers from the 11th Morphology Meeting, Vienna, February 2004, 109–32.
Amsterdam:
John Benjamins.
Google Scholar
Booij, Geert E.,
2009. Compounding and Construction Morphology. In
Rochelle Lieber and
Pavol Štekauer (eds.),
The Oxford handbook of compounding, 201–16.
Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Boyé, Gilles and
Patricia Cabredo Hofherr.
2010. Defectiveness in French and Spanish verbs. In Baerman, Corbett and Brown (eds.), 35–52.
Google Scholar
Bredenkamp, Andrew,
Louisa Sadler and
Andrew Spencer.
1998. Investigating argument structure: the Russian nominalization database. In
John Nerbonne (ed.),
Linguistic Databases, 137–60.
Stanford:
CSLI Publications.
Google Scholar
Brown, Dunstan. 1998a.
Defining ‘subgender’: virile and devirilized nouns in Polish.
Lingua 104,
187–233.
Google Scholar
Brown, Dunstan. 1998b. From the general to the exceptional: a network morphology account of Russian nominal inflection. PhD dissertation, University of Surrey.
Google Scholar
Brown, Dunstan.,
1998c. Stem indexing and morphonological selection in the Russian verb. In
Ray Fabri,
Albert Ortmann and
Teresa Parodi (eds.),
Models of inflection, 196–221.
Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Google Scholar
Brown, Dunstan.,
2001. Constructing a typological database for inflectional morphology: the SMG database for syncretism. In
Steven Bird,
Peter Buneman and
Mark Liberman (eds.),
Proceedings of the IRCS workshop on linguistic databases, Institute for Research in Cognitive Science, University of Pennsylvania, December 11–13, 2001, 56–64.
Google Scholar
Brown, Dunstan.,
2007.
Peripheral functions and overdifferentiation: the Russian second locative.
Russian Linguistics 31,
61–76.
Google Scholar
Brown, Dunstan and
Andrew Hippisley.
1994.
Conflict in Russian genitive plural assignment: a solution represented in DATR.
Journal of Slavic Linguistics 34,
48–76.
Google Scholar
Brown, Dunstan,
Greville G. Corbett,
Norman M. Fraser,
Andrew Hippisley and
Alan Timberlake.
1996.
Russian noun stress and Network Morphology.
Linguistics 34,
53–107.
Google Scholar
Brown, Dunstan,
Carole Tiberius and
Greville G. Corbett.
2004. Inflectional syncretism and corpora. Paper presented at the
Fifth International Workshop on Linguistically Interpreted Corpora (LINC-04).
Twentieth International Conference on Computational Linguistics.
Geneva, Switzerland. 29 August 2004. Paper available at
www.coli.uni-sb.de/linc04/brown.pdf.
Google Scholar
Brown, Dunstan,
Carole Tiberius and
Greville G. Corbett. ,
2007.
The alignment of form and function: corpus-based evidence from Russian.
International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 12.4,
511–34.
Google Scholar
Brown, Dunstan,
Carole Tiberius,
Marina Chumakina,
Greville Corbett and
Alexander Krasovitsky.
2009. Databases designed for investigating specific phenomena. In
Marin Everaert,
Simon Musgrave and
Alexis Dimitriadis (eds.),
The use of databases in cross-linguistic studies, 117–54.
Berlin and New York:
Mouton de Gruyter.
Google Scholar
Browne, Wayles. 1993. Serbo-Croat. In
Bernard Comrie and
Greville G. Corbett (eds.),
The Slavonic languages, 306–87.
London and New York:
Routledge.
Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan. 1985.
Morphology: a study of the relation between meaning and form.
Amsterdam:
John Benjamins.
Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan,
Revere Perkins and
William Pagliuca.
1994.
The evolution of grammar.
Chicago and London:
University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar
Cahill, Lynne and
Gerald Gazdar.
1997.
The inflectional phonology of German adjectives, determiners, and pronouns
. Linguistics 35,
211–45.
Google Scholar
Cahill, Lynne and
Gerald Gazdar.
1999.
German noun inflection
. Journal of Linguistics 35,
1–42.
Google Scholar
Carnie, Andrew. 2007.
Syntax: a generative introduction. 2nd edn.
Oxford:
Blackwell.
Google Scholar
Carstairs, Andrew. 1983.
Paradigm economy.
Journal of Linguistics 19,
115–28.
Google Scholar
Carstairs, Andrew. 1984.
Outlines of a constraint on syncretism.
Folia Linguistica 18,
73–85.
Google Scholar
Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrew. 1992.
Current morphology.
London:
Routledge.
Google Scholar
Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrew. 1994.
Inflection classes, gender, and the principle of contrast.
Language 70,
737–88.
Google Scholar
Cattell, R. 1976.
Constraints on movement rules.
Language 52,
18–50.
Google Scholar
Černyx, P. Ja. 1953.
Jazyk Uloženija 1649 Goda: voprosy orfografii, fonetiki i morfologii v svjazi s istoriej Uložennoj knigi.
Moscow:
Izdatel´stvo Akademii nauk SSSR.
Google Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro and
Sally McConnell-Ginet.
2000.
Meaning and grammar: an introduction to semantics.
Cambridge, MA:
MIT Press.
Google Scholar
Chumakina, Marina,
Andrew Hippisley and
Greville Corbett.
2004.
Istoričeskie izmenenija v russkoj leksike: slučaj čeredujuščegosja suppletivizma [Historical changes in the Russian lexicon: alternating suppletion].
Russian Linguistics 28,
281–315.
Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1991. Form and function in identifying cases. In
Frans Plank (ed.),
Paradigms: the economy of inflection, 41–55.
Berlin and New York:
Mouton de Gruyter.
Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville G. 1980. Animacy in Russian and other Slavonic languages: where syntax and semantics fail to match. In
Catherine V. Chvany and
Richard D. Brecht (eds.),
Morphosyntax in Slavic, 43–61.
Columbus, OH:
Slavica.
Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville G. 1982.
Gender in Russian: an account of gender specification and its relationship to declension
. Russian Linguistics 6,
197–232.
Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville G.,
1991.
Gender.
Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville G.,
2000.
Number.
Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville G.,
2006.
Agreement.
Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville G.,
2007. Deponency, syncretism and what lies between. In Baerman
et al. (eds.), 21–44.
Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville G.,
2009. Canonical inflection classes. In
Fabio F. Montermini,
Gilles Boyé and
Jesse Tseng (eds.),
Selected proceedings of the Sixth Decembrettes: morphology in Bordeaux, 1–11.
Somerville, MA:
Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville G., Forthcoming. Canonical morphosyntactic features. In
Dunstan Brown,
Greville G. Corbett and
Marina Chumakina (eds.),
Canonical morphology and syntax.
Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville G. and
Matthew Baerman.
2006.
Prolegomena to a typology of morphological features.
Morphology 16,
231–46.
Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville G. and
Norman Fraser.
1993.
Network Morphology: a DATR account of Russian nominal inflection.
Journal of Linguistics 29,
113–42.
Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville G. and
Norman Fraser.
1997.
Vyčislitel/naja lingvistika i tipologija [Computational linguistics meets typology].
Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Serija 9. Filologija,
122–40.
Google Scholar
Corbin, Danielle. 1987.
Morphologie dérivationelle et structuration du lexique (2 vols.).
Tübingen:
Niemeyer.
Google Scholar
Cubberley, Paul. 1994.
Handbook of Russian affixes.
Columbus, OH:
Slavica.
Google Scholar
Daelemans, W.,
K. de Smedt and
G. Gazdar.
1992.
Inheritance in natural language processing.
Computational Linguistics 18,
205–18.
Google Scholar
Dal´, Vladimir. 1880.
Tolkovyj slovar´ velikorusskago jazyka, vol I.
Moscow and St Petersburg:
M. O. Vol´f.
Google Scholar
Deo, Ashwini. 2007.
Derivational morphology in inheritance-based lexica: insights from Pāṇini.
Lingua 117,
175–201.
Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. 1994.
Ergativity.
Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Dodyxudoeva, Lelja R. 1988.
Šugnanskij glagol v istoričeskom osveščenii.
Dušanbe:
Akademija Nauk Tadžiskoj SSR.
Google Scholar
Donohue, Mark. 2001. Animacy, class and gender in Burmeso. In
Andrew Pawley,
Malcolm Ross and
Darrell Tryon (eds.),
The boy from Bundaberg: studies in Melanesian linguistics in honour of Tom Dutton, 97–115.
Canberra:
Pacific Linguistics.
Google Scholar
Doroszewski, Witold. 1962.
O kulturę słowa: Poradnik językowy.
Warsaw:
PIW.
Google Scholar
Dressler, Wolfgang U.,
Marianne Kilani-Schoch,
Natalia Gagarina,
Lina Pestal and
Markus Pöchtrager.
2006.
On the typology of inflection class systems.
Folia Linguistica 40, 1–2,
51–74.
Google Scholar
Embick, David and
Alec Marantz.
2008.
Architecture and blocking.
Linguistic Inquiry 39.1,
1–53.
Google Scholar
Embick, David and
Rolf Noyer.
2001.
Movement operations after syntax.
Linguistic Inquiry 32.4,
555–95.
Google Scholar
Embick, David and
Rolf Noyer.
2007. Distributed morphology and the syntax–morphology interface. In
Gillian Ramchand and
Charles Reiss (eds.),
The Oxford handbook of linguistic interfaces, 289–324.
Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Ernout, Alfred. 1945.
Morphologie historique du Latin.
Paris:
Klincksiek.
Google Scholar
Ernout, Alfred and
François Thomas.
1953.
Syntaxe Latine. 2nd edn.
Paris:
Klincksieck.
Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas. 1997. Head classes and agreement classes in the Mayali dialect chain. In
Mark Harvey and
Nicholas Reid (eds.),
Nominal classification in aboriginal Australia, 105–46.
Amsterdam:
John Benjamins.
Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas. 2004.
Bininj Gun-wok: a pan-dialectal grammar of Mayali, Kunwinjku and Kune.
Canberra:
Pacific Linguistics.
Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas,
Dunstan Brown and
Greville G. Corbett.
1998. Emu divorce: a unified account of gender and noun class assignment in Mayali. In
M. C. Gruber,
D. Higgins,
K. Olson and
T. Wysocki (eds.),
Proceedings of the 34th annual meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 127–42 . Chicago: CLS.
Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas. 2001. Dalabon pronominal prefixes and the typology of syncretism: a Network Morphology analysis. In
Geert Booij and
Jaap van Marle (eds.),
Yearbook of Morphology 2000, 187–232.
Dordrecht:
Kluwer.
Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas,
Dunstan Brown and
Greville G. Corbett,
2002.
The semantics of gender in Mayali: partially parallel systems and formal implementation.
Language 78,
111–55.
Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas,
Janet Fletcher and
Belinda Ross.
2008.
Big words, small phrases: mismatches between pause units and the polysynthetic word in Dalabon.
Linguistics 46,
89–129.
Google Scholar
Evans, Roger and
Gerald Gazdar.
1996.
DATR: a language for lexical knowledge representation.
Computational Linguistics 22.2,
167–216.
Google Scholar
Evans, Roger,
Gerald Gazdar and
Lionel Moser.
1993. Prioritised multiple inheritance in DATR. In
Ted Briscoe,
Ann Copestake and
Valeria de Paiva (eds.),
Inheritance, defaults and the lexicon, 38–46.
Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Fedjanina, Nina A. 1976.
Udarenie v sovremennom russkom jazyke.
Moscow:
Russkij jazyk.
Google Scholar
Finkel, Raphael and
Gregory Stump.
2007.
Principal parts and morphological typology.
Morphology 17,
39–75.
Google Scholar
Fischer, Wolfdietrich. 1997. Classical Arabic. In
Robert Hetzron (ed.),
The Semitic languages, 187–219.
London:
Routledge.
Google Scholar
Flickinger, Daniel. 1987.
Lexical rules in the hierarchical lexicon. PhD
dissertation, Stanford University.
Google Scholar
Flobert, Pierre. 1975.
Les verbes déponents Latins des origines à Charlemagne.
Paris:
Les Belles Lettres.
Google Scholar
Fortson, Benjamin W. 2004.
Indo-European language and culture: an introduction.
Oxford:
Blackwell.
Google Scholar
Fortune, Reo F. 1942.
Arapesh. (
Publications of the American Ethnological Society 19.)
New York:
J. J. Augustin.
Google Scholar
Frank, Wright Jay. 1999.
Nuer noun morphology. MA thesis,
State University of New York,
Buffalo.
Google Scholar
Fraser, Norman M. and
Greville G. Corbett.
1995. Gender, animacy and declensional class assignment: a unified account for Russian. In
Geert Booij and
Jaap van Marle (eds.),
Yearbook of Morphology 1994, 123–50.
Dordrecht:
Kluwer.
Google Scholar
Fraser, Norman M. and
Greville G. Corbett.
1997.
Defaults in Arapesh.
Lingua 103,
25–57.
Google Scholar
Gabka, K. 1975.
Die russische Sprache der Gegenwart, vol. II.
Düsseldorf:
Brücken-Verlag.
Google Scholar
Garde, P. 1980.
Grammaire russe.
Paris:
Institut d’
études slaves. (Collection de grammaires de l’Institut d’études slaves, VII, I.)
Google Scholar
Gazdar, Gerald,
Ewan Klein,
Geoffrey Pullum and
Ivan Sag.
1985.
Generalized phrase structure grammar.
Cambridge, MA:
Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar
Gerdts, Donna B. 1998. Incorporation. In
Arnold Zwicky and
Andrew Spencer (eds.),
The handbook of morphology, 84–100. Oxford: Blackwell.
Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele. 2006.
Constructions at work: the nature of generalization in language.
Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Goldsmith, John and
Jeremy O’
Brien.
2006.
Learning inflectional classes.
Language Learning and Development 2,
219–50.
Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1963. Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In
Joseph H. Greenberg (ed.),
Universals of language, 73–113.
Cambridge, MA:
MIT Press.
Google Scholar
Gvozdev, A. N. 1961.
Sovremennij russkij jazyk.
Moscow:
Prosveščenie.
Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane.
2005.
Verdubbeling van subjectpronomina in de Zuide-Nederlandse dialecten: een reactie uit Lapscheure.
Taal en Tongval 56,
119–59.
Google Scholar
Halle, Morris. 1970. A note on the accentual patterns of the Russian nominal declension. In
Roman Jakobson and
Shigeo Kawamoto (eds.),
Studies in general and oriental linguistics, 167–74.
Tokyo:
TEC.
Google Scholar
Halle, Morris. 1990. An approach to morphology.
NELS, BLSA Twentieth Annual Meeting, 151–84.
University of Massachusetts,
Amherst.
Google Scholar
Halle, Morris and
Alec Marantz.
1993. Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In
K. Hale and
S. J. Keyser (eds.),
The view from Building 20: essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, 111–76.
Cambridge, MA:
MIT Press.
Google Scholar
Hansson, Gunnar O. 2007. Productive syncretism in Saami inflectional morphology. In
Ida Toivonen and
Diane Nelson (eds.),
Saami linguistics, 91–135.
Amsterdam:
John Benjamins.
Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi. 1994. Hug a tree: deriving the morphosyntactic feature hierarchy. In
Andrew Carnie and
Heidi Harley (eds.),
MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 21, 275–80.
Cambridge, MA:
MIT Press.
Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi and
Rolf Noyer.
1999.
Distributed morphology.
Glot International 4.4,
3–9.
Google Scholar
Harris, Alice and
Lyle Campbell.
1995.
Historical syntax in cross-linguistic perspective.
Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Harris, Roy (trans.).
1983.
Course in general linguistics. [Cours de linguistique générale by
F. de Saussure.]
London:
Duckworth.
Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1993. More on the typology of inchoative/causative verb alternations. In
Bernard Comrie and
Maria Polinsky (eds.),
Causatives and Transitivity, 87–120.
Amsterdam: John
Benjamins.
Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2002.
Understanding morphology.
London:
Arnold.
Google Scholar
Heath, Jeffrey. 1991. Pragmatic disguise in pronominal-affix paradigms. In
Frans Plank (ed.),
Paradigms: the economy of inflection, 75–89.
Berlin:
Mouton de Gruyter.
Google Scholar
Heath, Jeffrey. 1998.
Pragmatic skewing in 1 <-> 2 pronominal combinations in Native American languages.
International Journal of American Linguistics 64,
83–104.
Google Scholar
Hippisley, Andrew. 1996.
Russian expressive derivation: a Network Morphology account.
Slavonic and East European Review 74.2,
201–22.
Google Scholar
Hippisley, Andrew. 1997.
Declarative derivation. Ph
D dissertation,
University of Surrey.
Google Scholar
Hippisley, Andrew. 1998.
Indexed stems and Russian word formation: a Network Morphology account of Russian personal nouns.
Linguistics 36,
1039–124.
Google Scholar
Hippisley, Andrew.,
2001. Word formation rules in a default inheritance framework: a network account of Russian personal nouns. In
Geert Booij and
Jaap van Marle (eds.),
Yearbook of morphology 1999, 221–61.
Dordrecht:
Kluwer.
Google Scholar
Hippisley, Andrew.,
2007. Declarative deponency: a Network Morphology account of morphological mismatches. In Baerman
et al. (eds.), 145–74.
Google Scholar
Hippisley, Andrew.,
2009. Towards a declarative definition of derivational relatedness: an orthogonal multiple inheritance approach to word-formation typology. Paper read at
Universals and Typology in Word-Formation,
Šafárik University,
Košice, Slovakia, August 2009.
Google Scholar
Hippisley, Andrew.,
2010a. Paradigmatic realignment and morphological change: diachronic deponency in Network Morphology. In
Franz Rainer et al. (eds.),
Variation and change in morphology, 107–27.
Amsterdam:
John Benjamins.
Google Scholar
Hippisley, Andrew.,
2010b. A declarative approach to language change: regularization as realignment. In Max Bane, Juan José Bueno Holle, Thomas Grano, April Lynn Grotberg and Yaron McNabb (eds.),
Proceedings of the 44th annual meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 261–75.
Chicago:
CLS.
Google Scholar
Hippisley, Andrew and
Gerald Gazdar.
1999. Inheritance hierarchies and historical reconstruction: towards a history of Slavonic colour terms. In
Sabrina Billings,
John Boyle and
Aaron Griffith (eds.),
Proceedings of the 35th annual of the Chicago Linguistic Society, vol. I, 125–40.
Chicago:
CLS.
Google Scholar
Hippisley, Andrew,
Marina Chumakina,
Greville G. Corbett and
Dunstan Brown.
2004.
Suppletion: frequency, categories and distribution of stems.
Studies in Language 28.2,
389–421.
Google Scholar
Hjelmslev, Louis. 1943.
Omkring sprogteoriens grundlœggelse.
Copenhagen:
Ejnar Munksgaard.
Google Scholar
Hjelmslev, Louis. ,
1961.
Prolegomena to a theory of language. Trans. of Hjelmslev 1943.
Madison, WI:
University of Wisconsin Press.
Google Scholar
Hock, Hans Henrich. 1986.
Principles of historical linguistics.
The Hague:
Mouton.
Google Scholar
Hualde, Jose Ignacio and Jon Ortiz de Urbina (eds.).
2003.
A grammar of Basque.
Berlin and New York:
Mouton de Gruyter.
Google Scholar
Huang, Cheng-Teh J. 1982.
Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar.
PhD dissertation,
MIT.
Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney and
Pullum, Geoffrey K. et al.
2002.
The Cambridge grammar of the English language.
Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Huntley, David. 1980. The evolution of genitive-accusative animate and personal nouns in Slavic dialects. In
Jacek Fisiak (ed.),
Historical morphology, 189–212.
The Hague, Paris and New York:
Mouton.
Google Scholar
Ilola, Eeva and
Arto Mustajoki.
1989.
Report on Russian morphology as it appears in Zaliznyak’s grammatical dictionary. (Slavica Helsingiensia 7.)
Department of Slavonic Languages, University of Helsinki. Google Scholar
Isačenko, A. V. 1968.
Die russische Sprache der Gegenwart, vol. I.
Halle:
Max Niemeyer Verlag.
Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. 1975.
Morphological and semantic regularities in the lexicon.
Language 51,
639–71.
Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. 1990.
Semantic structures.
Cambridge, MA:
MIT Press.
Google Scholar
Jakobi, Angelika. 1990.
A Fur grammar: phonology, morphophonology, and morphology.
Hamburg:
Helmut Buske.
Google Scholar
Karcevskij, S. 1932. Sur la structure du substantif russe.
Charisteria Guilelmo Mathesio quinquagenario: a discipulis et circuli linguistici pragensis sodalibus oblata, 65–73. Prague: Cercle linguistique de Prague.
Google Scholar
Kastovsky, Dieter. 2005. Hans Marchand and the Marchandeans. In
Štekauer and
Lieber (eds.), 99–124.
Google Scholar
Kay, Paul. 1997. Construction Grammar. In
Paul Kay (ed.),
Words and the grammar of context, 123–32.
Stanford:
CSLI Publications.
Google Scholar
Kemmer, Suzanne. 1993.
The middle voice.
Amsterdam: John
Benjamins.
Google Scholar
Kennedy, Benjamin. 1962.
Revised Latin primer.
Harlow:
Longman.
Google Scholar
Kibrik, Aleksandr E. 1977a.
Opyt strukturnogo opisanija Arčinskogo jazyka, vol. II: Taksonomičeskaja grammatika. (Publikacii otdelenija strukturnoj i prikladnoj lingvistiki 12.) Moscow:
Izdatel´stvo Moskovskogo Universiteta.
Google Scholar
Kibrik, Aleksandr E. 1977b.
Arčinskij jazyk: teksty i slovar´.
Moscow:
Izdatel´stvo Moskovskogo Universiteta.
Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1982. Lexical morphology and phonology. In
In-Seok Yang (ed.),
Linguistics in the morning calm: selected papers from SICOL-1981, 3–91.
Seoul:
Hanshin Publishing.
Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1983. Word formation and the lexicon. In
Frances Ingemann (ed.),
Proceedings of the 1982 Mid-American Linguistics Conference, 3–29.
University of Kansas.
Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul.,
2005. Blocking and periphrasis in inflectional paradigms. In
Geert Booij and
Jaap van Marle (eds.),
Yearbook of Morphology 2004, 113–35.
Dordrecht:
Kluwer.
Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Valentin. 1967.
Russische historische Grammatik, vol. II: Die Entwicklung des Formensystems.
Heidelberg:
Carl Winter.
Google Scholar
Klavans, Judith. 1985.
The independence of syntax and phonology in cliticization.
Language 61,
94–120.
Google Scholar
Klenin, Emily. 1983.
Animacy in Russian: a new interpretation.
Columbus, OH:
Slavica.
Google Scholar
Kotyczka, Josef. 1980.
Kurze polnische Sprachlehre.
Berlin:
Volk und Wissen.
Google Scholar
Krieger, Hans Ulrich and
John Nerbonne.
1993. Feature-based inheritance networks for computational lexicons. In
Ted Briscoe,
Ann Copestake and
Valeria de Paiva (eds.),
Inheritance, defaults and the lexicon, 90–136.
Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Kuhn, Jonas. 2007. Interfaces in constraint-based theories of grammar. In
Gillian Ramchand and
Charles Reiss (eds.),
The Oxford handbook of linguistic interfaces, 613–50.
Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Kühner, Raphael. 1955.
Ausführliche Grammatik der Lateinischen Sprache (revised by Andreas Thierfelder).
Hamburg:
Hahn.
Google Scholar
Ladd, D. Robert,
Bert Remijsen and
Caguor Adong Manyang.
2009.
On the distinction between regular and irregular inflectional morphology: evidence from Dinka.
Language 85,
659–70.
Google Scholar
Lavidas, Nikolaos and
Dimitra Papangeli.
2007. Deponency in the diachrony of Greek. In Baerman
et al. (eds.), 97–26.
Google Scholar
LeTourneau, Mark S. 2003. Interpretability, feature strength, and impoverished agreement in Arabic. In
Dilworth B. Parkinson and
Samira Farwaneh (eds.),
Perspectives on Arabic linguistics XV, 85–134.
Amsterdam:
John Benjamins.
Google Scholar
Lieber, Rochelle. 1992.
Deconstructing morphology.
University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar
Lieber, Rochelle. 2000. Internal structure of words. In
G. Booij,
C. Lehmann and
J. Mugdan (eds.),
Morphology: an international handbook on inflection and word formation, 404–16.
Berlin:
Mouton de Gruyter.
Google Scholar
Lieber, Rochelle.,
2004.
Morphology and lexical semantics.
Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Lieber, Rochelle.,
2007.
The category of roots and the roots of categories: what we learn from selection in derivation.
Morphology 16,
247–72.
Google Scholar
Lieber, Rochelle.,
2009. A lexical semantic approach to compounding. In
Rochelle Lieber and
Pavol Štekauer (eds.),
The Oxford handbook of compounding, 78–104.
Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Lodge, Gonzalez. 1901–33.
Lexicon Plautinum, vols. I-II. Leipzig. Reprinted 1962,
Hildesheim:
Olms.
Google Scholar
Luís, Ana and
Spencer, Andrew. 2005. A paradigm function account of ‘mesoclisis’ in European Portuguese. In
Geert Booij and
Jaap Van Marle (eds.),
Yearbook of Morphology 2004, 177–228.
Dordrecht:
Kluwer.
Google Scholar
Maiden, Martin. 2002. Sound change, morphemic structure and the rise of suppletion in the Romance verb. Paper presented at the
Surrey Linguistics Circle,
University of Surrey.
Google Scholar
Maiden, Martin. 2004.
When lexemes become allomorphs: on the genesis of suppletion.
Folia Linguistica 38,
227–56.
Google Scholar
Maiden, Martin and
Paul O’
Neill.
2010. On morphomic defectiveness: evidence from the Romance languages of the Iberian peninsula. In Baerman, Corbett and Brown (eds.), 103–24.
Google Scholar
Mańczak, Witold. 1956.
Ile jest rodzajów w polskim? Język Polski 36.2,
116–21.
Google Scholar
Marchand, Hans. 1960.
The categories and types of present-day English word-formation.
Wiesbaden:
Harassowitz.
Google Scholar
Matthews, Peter H. 1972.
Inflectional morphology.
Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Matthews, Peter H. 2007. How safe are our analyses? In Baerman
et al. (eds.), 297–316.
Google Scholar
Matthews, William Kleesmann. 1960.
Russian historical grammar.
University of London, Athlone Press.
Google Scholar
McMahon, April. 1994.
Understanding language change.
Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Mel’
čuk, Igor. 2006.
Aspects of the theory of morphology.
Berlin:
Mouton de Gruyter.
Google Scholar
Meyer, Peter. 1994.
Grammatical categories and the methodology of linguistics. Review of W. Andries van Helden, Concept formation between morphology and syntax.
Russian Linguistics 18,
341–77.
Google Scholar
Miller, Philip H. 1992.
Clitics and constituents in phrase structure grammar.
New York:
Garland.
Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne. 1984.
The evolution of noun incorporation.
Language 60,
847–94.
Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne and
Greville G. Corbett.
1999. The effect of noun incorporation on argument structure. In
Lunella Mereu (ed.),
Boundaries of morphology and syntax, 49–71.
Amsterdam:
John Benjamins.
Google Scholar
Mofu, Suriel Semuel. 2008.
Biak morphosyntax. PhD dissertation,
Oxford University.
Google Scholar
Müller, Gereon. 2004. On decomposing inflection class features: syncretism in Russian noun inflection. In
Gereon Müller,
Lutz Gunkel and
Gisela Zifonun (eds.),
Explorations in nominal inflection, 189–227.
Berlin:
Mouton de Gruyter.
Google Scholar
Müller, Gereon. 2008.
Review of Matthew Baerman, Dunstan Brown and Greville G. Corbett, The syntax–morphology interface: a study of syncretism.
Word Structure 1,
199–232.
Google Scholar
Nixon, Paul. 1924.
Plautus (5 vols.).
Cambridge, MA:
Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar
Noyer, Rolf. 1997.
Features, positions and affixes in autonomous morphological structure.
New York:
Garland.
Google Scholar
Noyer, Rolf. 1998. Impoverishment theory and morphosyntactic markedness. In
Steven G. Lapointe,
Diane K. Brentari and
Patrick M. Farrell (eds.),
Morphology and its relation to phonology and syntax, 264–85.
Stanford:
CSLI Publications.
Google Scholar
Palmer, Bill. 2009.
Kokota grammar: Oceanic Linguistics Special Publication.
Honolulu:
University of Hawai’i Press.
Google Scholar
Palmer, Bill and
Dunstan Brown.
2007.
Heads in Oceanic indirect possession.
Oceanic Linguistics 46,
199–209.
Google Scholar
Payne, John. 1980.
The decay of ergativity in Pamir languages.
Lingua 51,
147–86.
Google Scholar
Perlmutter, David M. and
Janez Orešnik.
1973. Language-particular rules and explanation in syntax. In
Stephen R. Anderson and
Paul Kiparsky (eds.),
A festschrift for Morris Halle, 419–59.
New York:
Holt, Rinehart and Winston. Google Scholar
Plag, Ingo. 2002. The role of selectional restrictions, phonotactics, and parsing in constraining suffix ordering in English. In
Geert Booij and
Jaap Van Marle (eds.),
Yearbook of Morphology 2001, 285–314.
Dordrecht:
Kluwer.
Google Scholar
Plag, Ingo. 2003.
Word-formation in English.
Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Plag, Ingo and
Harald Baayen.
2009.
Suffix ordering and morphological processing.
Language 85,
109–52.
Google Scholar
Plank, Frans. 1994. Inflection and derivation. In
R. Asher (ed.),
Encyclopedia of language and linguistics, vol. III., 1671–8.
Oxford:
Pergamon Press.
Google Scholar
Plank, Frans and
Wolfgang Schellinger.
1997.
The uneven distribution of genders over numbers: Greenberg’s Nos. 37 and 45.
Linguistic Typology 1,
53–101.
Google Scholar
Priestly, T. M. S. 1993. Slovene. In
Bernard Comrie and
Greville G. Corbett (eds.),
The Slavonic languages, 388–454.
London:
Routledge.
Google Scholar
Przepiórkowski, Adam. 2003. A hierarchy of Polish genders. In
Piotr Bański and
Adam Przepiórkowski (eds.),
Generative linguistics in Poland: morphosyntactic investigations, 109–22.
Warsaw:
Instytut Podstaw Informatyki PAN.
Google Scholar
Rainer, Franz. 2005. Constraints on productivity. In Štekauer and Lieber (eds.), 335–52.
Google Scholar
Rappaport, Gilbert C. 2010. The grammaticalization of the category
masculine personal in West Slavic. In
Björn Hansen and
Jasmina Grković (eds.),
Diachronic Slavic syntax: gradual changes in focus, Wiener Slawistischer Almanach Sonderband 74, 169–80.
Munich, Berlin and Vienna:
Verlag Otto Sagner.
Google Scholar
Redkin, V. A. 1971.
Akcentologija sovremennogo russkogo literaturnogo jazyka: posobie dlja učitelej.
Moscow:
Prosveščenie.
Google Scholar
Reformatskij, A. A. 1975. Fonemy jot i ‘i’ v russkom jazyke. In
A. Reformatskij (ed.),
Fonologičeskie ètjudy, 74–96.
Moscow:
Nauka.
Google Scholar
Riehemann, Suzanne. 1998.
Type-based derivational morphology.
Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 2,
49–77.
Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian. 2007. Head movement. In Baltin and Collins (eds.), 113–47.
Google Scholar
Ross, Malcolm. 2005. Pronouns as a preliminary diagnostic for grouping Papuan languages. In
Andrew Pawley,
Robert Attenborough,
Robin Hide and
Jack Golson (eds.),
Papuan pasts: cultural, linguistic and biological histories of Papuan-speaking peoples, 15–66.
Canberra:
Pacific Linguistics.
Google Scholar
Sag, Ivan A.,
Thomas Wasow and
Emily M. Bender (eds.).
2003.
Syntactic theory: a formal introduction.
Stanford:
CSLI Publications.
Google Scholar
Saloni, Zygmunt. 1988.
O tzw. formach nieosobowych męskoosobowych we współczesnej polszczyźnie.
Biuletyn Polskiego towarzystwa jezykoznawczego 41,
155–66.
Google Scholar
Samvelian, Pollet. 2007.
A (phrasal) affix analysis of the Persian ezafe.
Journal of Linguistics 43,
605–45.
Google Scholar
Šanskij, N. M. 1975.
Russkij jazyk. Leksika. Slovoobrazovanie.
Moscow:
Prosveščenie.
Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward. 1911.
The problem of incorporation in American languages.
American Anthropologist 13,
250–82.
Google Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand de. 1915.
Cours de linguistique générale.
Paris:
Payot.
Google Scholar
Scalise, Sergio and
Emiliano Guevara.
2005. The lexicalist approach to word-formation and the notion of the lexicon. In Štekauer and Lieber (eds.), 147–88.
Google Scholar
Scalise, Sergio and
Antonietta Bisetto.
2009. The classification of compounds. In
Rochelle Lieber and
Pavol Štekauer (eds.),
The Oxford handbook of compounding, 34–53.
Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
Schmitz, Leonhard. 2004.
Grammar of the Latin language.
New York:
Hippocrene. First published 1851 by Lea & Blanchard.
Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elizabeth. 1982.
The syntax of words.
Cambridge, MA:
MIT Press.
Google Scholar
Siegel, Dorothy. 1977. The adjacency constraint and the theory of morphology. In
M. J. Stein (ed.),
Proceedings of the 8th Annual Meeting of the North-Eastern Linguistics Society, 189–97.
Amherst:
University of Massachusetts.
Google Scholar
Skorik, Pjotr Ja. 1977.
Grammatika čukotskogo jazyka (Čast’ 2: Glagol, Narečie, Služebnie Slova).
Leningrad:
Nauka.
Google Scholar
Smith-Stark, T. Cedric. 1974. The plurality split. In
M. W. L. Galy,
R. A. Fox and
A. Brucks (eds.),
Proceedings of the 10th annual meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 657–71.
Chicago:
CLS.
Google Scholar
Sowa, John F. 2000.
Knowledge representation: logical, philosophical, and computational foundations.
Pacific Grove, CA:
Brooks Cole Publishing Co.
Google Scholar
Spencer, Andrew. 1991.
Morphological theory.
Oxford:
Blackwell.
Google Scholar
Spencer, Andrew. 1993.
Review of Rochelle Lieber, Deconstructing morphology.
Language 69,
580–7.
Google Scholar
Spencer, Andrew.,
2000a. Agreement morphology in Chukotkan. In
Wolfgang U. Dressler,
Oskar E. Pfeiffer,
Markus Pöchtrager and
John R. Rennison (eds.),
Morphological Analysis in Comparison, 191–222.
Amsterdam and Philadelphia:
John Benjamins.
Google Scholar
Spencer, Andrew.,
2000b. Morphology and syntax. In
Geert Booij,
Christian Lehmann and
Joachim Mugdan (eds.),
Morphology: an international handbook on inflection and word formation, 312–35.
Berlin:
Mouton de Gruyter.
Google Scholar
Spencer, Andrew.,
2002.
Gender as an inflectional category.
Journal of Linguistics 38,
279–312.
Google Scholar
Spencer, Andrew.,
2004. Morphology – an overview of central concepts. In
Louisa Sadler and
Andrew Spencer (eds.),
Projecting Morphology, 67–110.
Stanford:
CSLI Publications.
Google Scholar
Spencer, Andrew.,
2005. Towards a typology of ‘mixed categories’. In
C. Orhan Orgun and
Peter Sells (eds.),
Morphology and the web of grammar: essays in memory of Steven G. Lapointe, 95–138.
Stanford:
CSLI Publications.
Google Scholar
Sridhar, S. N. 1990.
Kannada.
London and New York:
Routledge.
Google Scholar
Stang, Christian S. 1952.
La langue du livre ‘Učenie i xitrost′ ratnago stroenija pexotnyx″ ljudej’ 1647. Oslo: Norske Videnskaps-Akademi.
Google Scholar
Stankiewicz, Edward. 1978. The inflection of Serbo-Croatian substantives and their genitive plural endings. In
H. Birnbaum (ed.),
American contributions to the Eighth International Congress of Slavists, vol I: Linguistics and Poetics, 666–81.
Columbus, OH:
Slavicas.
Google Scholar
Steinhauer, Hein. 1985.
Number in Biak; counterevidence to two alleged language universals.
Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde 141,
462–85.
Google Scholar
Štekauer, Pavol and
Rochelle Lieber (eds.).
2005.
Handbook of word-formation.
Dordrecht:
Springer.
Google Scholar
Stewart, Thomas and
Gregory Stump.
2007. Paradigm function morphology and the morphology–syntax interface. In
Gillian Ramchand and
Charles Reiss (eds.),
The Oxford handbook of linguistic interfaces, 383–421.
Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Stolz, Thomas. 2008. Kymrische Ausnahmen order walisische Regeln? Was die substantivische Pluralvariation uns lehrt. In
Cornelia Stroh and
Aina Urdze (eds.),
Morphologische Irregularität: neue Ansätze, Sichtweisen und Daten, 111–50.
Bochum:
Universitätsverlag Dr. N. Brockmeyer.
Google Scholar
Strecker, Karl. 1929.
Einführung in das Mittellatein.
Berlin:
Weodmann.
Google Scholar
Stump, Gregory T. 1990. Breton inflection and the split morphology hypothesis. In
R. Hendrick (ed.),
The syntax of the modern Celtic languages, 97–119.
San Diego:
Academic Press.
Google Scholar
Stump, Gregory T. 1991.
A paradigm-based theory of morphosemantic mismatches.
Language 67,
675–725.
Google Scholar
Stump, Gregory T.,
1993.
Review of Rochelle Lieber, Deconstructing morphology.
Journal of Linguistics 29,
485–90.
Google Scholar
Stump, Gregory T.,
1998. Inflection. In
Andrew Spencer and
Arnold Zwicky (eds.),
The handbook of morphology, 13–43.
Oxford:
Blackwell.
Google Scholar
Stump, Gregory T.,
2001.
Inflectional morphology: a theory of paradigm structure.
Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Stump, Gregory T.,
2002. Morphological and syntactic paradigms: arguments for a theory of paradigm linkage. In
Geert Booij and
Jaap van Marle (eds.),
Yearbook of Morphology 2001, 147–80.
Dordrecht:
Kluwer.
Google Scholar
Stump, Gregory T.,
2005a. Rules about paradigms. In
C. Orhan Orgun and
Peter Sells (eds.),
Morphology and the web of grammar: essays in memory of Steven G. Lapointe, 49–82.
Stanford:
CSLI Publications.
Google Scholar
Stump, Gregory T.,
2005b. Word-formation and inflectional morphology. In
Štekauer and
Lieber (eds.), 49–72.
Google Scholar
Stump, Gregory T.,
2006.
Heteroclisis and paradigm linkage.
Language 82,
279–322.
Google Scholar
Stump, Gregory T.,
2010. Morphology. In
Patrick Hogan (ed.),
The Cambridge encyclopedia of the language sciences, 515–19.
Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Švedova, N. Ju (ed.).
1984.
Slovar’ russkogo jazyka S.I. Ožegova.
Moscow:
Russkij Jazyk.
Google Scholar
Švedova, N. Ju.,
N. D. Artunjunova,
A. V. Bondarko,
Val. Vas. Ivanov,
V. V. Lopatin,
I. S. Uluxanov and
F. P. Filin.
1980.
Russkaja grammatika, vol. I.
Moscow:
AN SSSR.
Google Scholar
Szymanek, Bogdan. 1988.
Categories and categorization in morphology.
Lublin:
Catholic University Press.
Google Scholar
Thorndahl, W. 1974.
Genetivens og lokativens -у/-ю-endelser i Russiske middelaldertekster. (med Tysk resumé).
Copenhagen:
Rosenkilde og Baggers Forlag.
Google Scholar
Thornton, Anna.
2011. Overabundance (multiple forms realizing the same cell): a non-canonical phenomenon in Italian verb morphology. In
Maria Goldbach,
Marc-Olivier Hinzelin,
Martin Maiden and
John Charles Smith (eds.),
Morphological autonomy: Perspectives from Romance inflectional morphology.
Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Timberlake, Alan. 1993. Russian. In
Bernard Comrie and
Greville G. Corbett (eds.),
The Slavonic languages, 827–86.
London:
Routledge.
Google Scholar
Timberlake, Alan. 2004.
A reference grammar of Russian.
Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Tixonov, A. N. 1985.
Slovoobrazovatel´nyj slovar´ russkogo jazyka.
Moscow:
Russkij Jazyk.
Google Scholar
Tokarski, Jan. 1993.
Schematyczny indeks a tergo polskich form wyrazowych. Opracowanie i redakcja: Zygmunt Saloni.
Warsaw:
Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Google Scholar
Tosco, Mauro. 2001.
The Dhaasanac language.
Cologne:
Rüdiger Köppe.
Google Scholar
Touretzky, D. 1986.
The mathematics of inheritance systems.
London:
Pitman.
Google Scholar
Townsend, Charles. 1975.
Russian word-formation.
Columbus, OH:
Slavica.
Google Scholar
Trask, Robert Lawrence. 1997.
A student’s dictionary of language and linguistics.
London:
Arnold.
Google Scholar
Tseng, Jesse. 2003. Phrasal affixes and French morphosyntax. In
Gerald Penn,
Gerhard Jäger,
Paola Monachesi and
Shuly Wintner (eds.),
Proceedings of Formal Grammar 2003, 177–88.
Stanford:
CSLI Publications.
Google Scholar
Uluxanov, I. C. 1979.
Slovoobrazovatel´nye otnošenija meždu častjami reči.
Voprosy jazykoznanija 28.4,
101–10.
Google Scholar
Unbegaun, B. O. 1935.
La langue russe au XVIe siècle (1500–1550), vol. I: La flexion des noms.
Paris.
Google Scholar
Unbegaun, B. O. 1969. Les anciens russes vus par eux-memes.
Selected papers on Russian and Slavonic Philology, 272–86.
Oxford:
Clarendon Press.
Google Scholar
Uspensky, Boris A. 1965.
Strukturnaja tipologija jazykov.
Moscow:
Nauka.
Google Scholar
van den Heuvel, Wilco. 2006.
Biak: description of an Austronesian language of Papua.
Utrecht:
LOT.
Google Scholar
van Helden, W. Andries. 1993.
Case and gender: concept formation between morphology and syntax (2 vols.).
Amsterdam:
Rodopi.
Google Scholar
van Marle, Jaap. 1985.
On the paradigmatic dimension of morphological productivity.
Dordrecht:
Foris.
Google Scholar
Vasmer, Maks. 1986.
Ètimologičeskij slovar´ russkogo jazyka, ed. and trans.
O. N. Trubačev. 2nd edn.
Moscow:
Progress.
Google Scholar
Vinogradov, V. V 1960.
Grammatika russkogo jazyka, vol 1: Fonetika i morfologija.
Moscow:
Nauka.
Google Scholar
Vinogradov, V. V(ed.).
1954.
Slovar´ jazyka Puškina.
Moscow: Gosudarstvennoe izdatel′stvo inostrannyx i nastsional′nyx slovarej.
Google Scholar
Vinogradov, V. V.,
Istrina, E. S. and
S. G. Barxudarov (eds.).
1953.
Grammatika russkogo jazyka, vol. L: Fonetika i morfologija.
Moscow:
AN SSSR.
Google Scholar
Walker, G. S. M. (ed.).
1957.
Sancti Columbani opera.
Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies.
Google Scholar
Wertz, C. A. 1977.
The number of genders in Polish.
Canadian Slavonic Papers 19,
50–63.
Google Scholar
Williams, Edwin. 1981.
On the notions ‘lexically related’ and ‘head of word’.
Linguistic Inquiry 12,
245–74.
Google Scholar
Williams, Edwin.,
2007. Dumping lexicalism. In
Gillian Ramchand and
Charles Reiss (eds.),
The Oxford handbook of linguistic interfaces, 353–81.
Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Worth, Dean S. 1966.
On the stem/ending boundary in Slavic indeclinables.
Zbornik za Filologiju i Lingvistiku 9,
11–16.
Google Scholar
Wunderlich, Dieter. 2001. A correspondence-theoretic analysis of Dalabon transitive paradigms. In
Geert Booij and
Jaap van Marle (eds.),
Yearbook of Morphology 2000, 233–52.
Dordrecht:
Kluwer.
Google Scholar
Wunderlich, Dieter and
Ray Fabri.
1995.
Minimalist morphology: an approach to inflection.
Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 14,
236–94.
Google Scholar
Wurzel, Wolfgang U. 1984.
Flexionsmorphologie und Natürlichkeit.
Berlin:
Akademie-Verlag.
Google Scholar
Xu, Zheng,
Mark Aronoff and
Frank Anshen.
2007. Deponency in Latin. In Baerman
et al. (eds.), 127–44.
Google Scholar
Yonge, C. D. (trans.).
1856.
The Orations of Marcus Tullius Cicero.
London:
Henry G. Bohn.
Google Scholar
Zaliznjak, Andrej A. 1967.
Russkoe imennoe slovoizmenenie.
Moscow:
Nauka.
Google Scholar
Zaliznjak, Andrej A. 1973. O ponimanii termina ‘padež’ v lingvističeskix opisanijax. In
Andrej A. Zaliznjak (ed.),
Problemy grammatičeskogo modelirovanija, 53–87.
Moscow:
Nauka.
Google Scholar
Zaliznjak, Andrej A.,
1977.
Grammatičeskij slovar′ russkogo jazyka.
Moscow:
Russkij jazyk.
Google Scholar
Zieniukowa, Jadwiga. 1981.
Rodzaj męski osobowy we współczesnych językach zachodniosłowiańskich.
Wrocław:
Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich, Wydawnictwo Polskiej Akademii Nauk.
Google Scholar
Žukova, Alevtina N. 1972.
Grammatika korjakskogo jazyka: fonetika, morfologija.
Leningrad:
Nauka.
Google Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold. 1985a.
Heads.
Journal of Linguistics 21,
1–29.
Google Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold. 1985b. How to describe inflection. In
Mary Niepokuj,
Mary Van Clay,
Vassiliki Nikiforidou and
Deborah Feder (eds.),
Proceedings of the eleventh annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 372–86.
Berkeley Linguistics Society.
Google Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold.,
1992. Some choices in the theory of morphology. In
R. D. Levine (ed.),
Formal grammar: theory and implementation, 327–71.
Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold.,
1993. Heads, bases and functors. In
Norman Fraser and
Greville G. Corbett (eds.),
Heads in grammatical theory, 292–315.
Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold.,
1996. Syntax and phonology. In
K. Brown and
J. Miller (eds.),
Concise encyclopedia of syntactic theories, 300–5.
Oxford:
Elsevier Science.
Google Scholar 
