Abercrombie, N. and B. Longhurst (1998). Audiences: A Sociological Theory of Performance and Imagination. London, Sage
Adams, K. L. (1999). ‘Deliberate dispute and the construction of oppositional stance’. Pragmatics 9: 231–48
Agar, M. and MacDonald, J. (1995). ‘Focus groups and ethnography’. Human Organization 54: 78–86
Antaki, C. (1994). Explaining and Arguing: The Social Organization of Accounts. London, Sage
Antaki, C. (1998). ‘A conversation-analytic approach to arguments’. In M. Bondi, ed., Forms of Argumentative Discourse. Bologna, CLUEB (Cooperativa Libraria Universitaria Editrice Bologna): 57–70
Antaki, C., Condor, S., and Levine, M. (1996). ‘Social identities in talk: speakers’ own orientations’. British Journal of Social Psychology 35: 473–92
Antaki, C., Diaz, F., and Collins, A. F. (1996). ‘Keeping your footing: conversational completion in three-part sequences’. Journal of Pragmatics 25 (2): 151–71
Antaki, C., Houtkoop-Steenstra, H. and Rapley, M. (2000). ‘“Brilliant. Next question …”: high-grade assessment sequences in the completion of interactional units’. Research on Language and Social Interaction 33 (3): 235–62
Antaki, C. and Rapley, M. (1996a). ‘“Quality of life” talk: the liberal paradox of psychological testing’. Discourse and Society 7: 293–316
Antaki, C. and Rapley, M. (1996b). ‘Questions and answers to psychological assessment schedules: hidden troubles in “quality of life” interviews’. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 40: 421–37
Antaki, C. and S. Widdicombe (1998). Identities in Talk. London, Sage
Arendt, H. (1963). On Revolution. London, Faber and Faber
Atkinson, J. M. and P. Drew (1979). Order in Court: The Organisation of Verbal Interaction in Judicial Settings. London, Macmillan
Atkinson, J. M. and J. Heritage, eds. (1984). Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
Auer, P., ed. (1998). Code-Switching in Conversation: Language, Interaction and Identity. London, Routledge
Auer, P. and A. di Luzio, eds. (1992). The Contextualisation of Language. Amsterdam, Benjamins
Aukrust, V. G. and Snow, C. E. (1998). ‘Narratives and explanations during mealtime conversations in Norway and the U.S.’ Language in Society 27: 221–46
Baker, R. and R. Hinton (1999). ‘Do focus groups facilitate meaningful participation in social research?’ In R. S. Barbour and J. Kitzinger, eds., Developing Focus Group Research. London, Sage: 79–98
Bakhtin, M. (1986). Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. Austin, University of Texas Press
Banfield, A. (1982). Unspeakable Sentences: Narration and Representation in the Language of Fiction. Boston, MA, Routledge and Kegan Paul
Barber, B. (1996). ‘Foundationalism and democracy’. In S. Benhabib, ed., Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political. Princeton, Princeton University Press: 348–59
Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an Ecology of Mind. New York, Ballantine
Bauer, M. W. (2000). ‘Classical content analysis: a review’. In M. W. Bauer and G. Gaskell, eds., Qualitative Researching with Text, Image, and Sound. London, Sage: 131–51
Baynham, M. (1996). ‘Direct speech: what's it doing in non-narrative discourse?’ Journal of Pragmatics 25 (1): 61–81
Baynham, M. (1999). ‘Double-voicing and the scholarly ‘I’: on incorporating the words of others in academic discourse’. Text 19: 485–504
Baynham, M. and Slembrouck, S. (1999). ‘Speech representation and institutional discourse’. Text 19: 439–57
Beach, W. A. (1990). ‘Language as and in technology: Facilitating topic organization in a videotext focus group meeting’. In M. J. Medhurst, A. Gonzalez, and T. R. Peterson, eds., Communication and the Culture of Technology. Pullman, WA, Washington State University Press: 199–219
Beck, U. (1992). Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London, Sage
Beck, U. (1995). Ecological Politics in an Age of Risk. Cambridge, Polity Press
Becker, H. S. (1998). Tricks of the Trade: How to Think About Your Research While You’re Doing It. Chicago, University of Chicago Press
Bell, A. (1991). The Language of News Media. Oxford, Blackwell
Bell, A. and P. Garrett, eds. (1998). Approaches to Media Discourse. Oxford, Blackwell
Bell, P. and T. van Leeuwen (1994). The Media Interview: Confession, Context, Conversation. Kensington, University of New South Wales Press
Belson, W. A. (1981). The Design and Understanding of Survey Questions. Aldershot, Hampshire, Gower
Berlant, L. (1997). The Queen of America Goes to Washington City: Essays on Sex and Citizenship. Durham, NC, Duke University Press
Bertrand, J. T., Brown, J. E., and Ward, V. M. (1992). ‘Techniques for Analyzing Focus Group Data’. Evaluation Review 16 (2): 198–209
Billig, M. (1978). Fascists: A Social Psychological View of the National Front. London/New York, Academic Press
Billig, M. (1987). Arguing and Thinking: A Rhetorical Approach to Social Psychology. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
Billig, M. (1991a). Ideology and Opinions: Studies in Rhetorical Psychology. London, Sage
Billig, M. (1991b). Talking of the Royal Family. London, Routledge
Billig, M. (1995). Banal Nationalism. London, Sage
Billig, M. (1999). ‘Whose terms? Whose ordinariness?’ Discourse & Society 10: 543–58
Billig, M., S. Condor, D. Edwards, M. Gane, D. Middleton, and A. Radley (1988). Ideological Dilemmas: A Social Psychology of Everyday Thinking. London, Sage
Bilmes, J. (1988). ‘The concept of preference in conversation analysis’. Language in Society 17: 161–81
Bloor, M., J. Frankland, M. Thomas, and K. Robson (2001). Focus Groups in Social Research. London, Sage
Blumer, H. (1948). ‘Public opinion and public opinion polling’. American Sociological Review 13: 242–9
Blum-Kulka, S. (1997a). Dinner Talk: Cultural Patterns of Sociability and Socialization in Family Discourse. Mahwah, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Blum-Kulka, S. (1997b). ‘Discourse pragmatics’. In T. A. van Dijk, ed., Discourse as Social Interaction. London, Sage: 38–63
Blumler, J. G. and M. Gurevitch (1996). ‘Media change and social change: linkages and junctures’. In J. Curran and M. Gurevitch, eds., Mass Media and Society. London, Arnold: 120–40
Boden, D. (1994). The Business of Talk. Cambridge, Polity Press
Boden, D. and D. Zimmerman, eds. (1991). Talk and Social Structure: Studies in Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis. Cambridge, Polity Press
Boltanski, L. (1999). Distant Suffering. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
Bourdieu, P. (1971/1993). ‘Public opinion does not exist’. In Sociology in Question. London, Sage: 149–57
Boyle, R. (2000). ‘Whatever happened to preference organisation?’ Journal of Pragmatics 32 (5): 583–604
Brannigan, A. (1981). The Social Basis of Scientific Discoveries. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
Briggs, C. L. (1986). Learning How to Ask. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
Brown, G. and G. Yule (1983). Discourse Analysis. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
Brown, P. and S. Levinson (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Use. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
Brown, R. and A. Gilman (1960). ‘The pronouns of politeness and solidarity’. In T. A. Sebeok, ed., Style in Language. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press: 253–76
Bryce, J. (1888). The American Commonwealth, 2 vols. London, Macmillan
Bucholtz, M. (2000). ‘The politics of transcription’. Journal of Pragmatics 32: 1439–65
Burgess, J., Limb, M., and Harrison, C. M. (1988a). ‘Exploring environmental values through the medium of small groups: 2. Illustrations of a group at work’. Environment and Planning A 20 (4): 457–76
Burgess, J., Limb, M., and Harrison, C. M. (1988b). ‘Exploring environmental values through the medium of small groups: 1. Theory and practice.’ Environment and Planning A 20: 309–26
Buttny, R. (1997). ‘Reported speech in talking race on campus’. Human Communication Research 23 (4): 477–506
Buttny, R. (1998). ‘Putting prior talk into context: reported speech and the reporting context’. Research on Language and Social Interaction 31 (1): 45–58
Buttny, R. (1999). ‘Discursive constructions of racial boundaries and self-segregation on campus’. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 18 (3): 247–68
Buttny, R. and Williams, P. L. (2000). ‘Demanding respect: the uses of reported speech in discursive constructions of interracial contact’. Discourse & Society 11 (1): 109–33
Button, G. (1991). ‘Conversation-in-a-series’. In D. Bowen and D. Zimmerman, eds., Talk and Social Structure: Studies in Ethno-methodology and Conversation Analysis. Cambridge, Polity Press: 251–77
Button, G. and N. Casey (1984). ‘Generating topic: the use of topic initial elicitors’. In J. M. Atkinson and J. Heritage, eds., Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 167–90
Button, G. and J. R. E. Lee (1987). Talk and Social Organisation. Clevedon, Avon, Multilingual Matters
Caldas-Coulthard, C. R. (1994). ‘On reporting reporting: the representation of speech in factual and factional narratives’. In M. Coulthard, ed., Advances in Written Text Analysis. London, Routledge: 295–308
Calhoun, C., ed. (1992). Habermas and the Public Sphere. Studies in contemporary German social thought. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press
Carter, R. and McCarthy, M. (1995). ‘Grammar and the spoken language’. Applied Linguistics 16 (2): 141–58
Catterall, C. and MacLaren, P. (1997). ‘Focus group data and qualitative analysis programmes: coding the moving picture as well as the snapshots’. Sociological Research Online 2 (1)
Clark, H. H. and Gerrig, R. J. (1990). ‘Quotations as demonstrations’. Language 66 (4): 764–805
Clayman, S. E. (1988). ‘Displaying neutrality in television news interviews’. Social Problems 35 (4): 474–92
Clayman, S. E. (1991). ‘News interview openings: aspects of sequential organization’. In P. Scannell, ed., Broadcast Talk. London, Sage: 48–75
Clayman, S. E. and J. Heritage (2002). The News Interview: Journalists and Public Figures on the Air. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
Coates, J. (1996). Women Talk: Conversation Between Women Friends. Oxford, Blackwell
Coates, J. (2000). ‘Small talk and subversion: female speakers backstage’. In J. Coupland, ed., Small Talk. Harlow, Longman: 241–64
Coates, J. and Thornborrow, J. (1999). ‘Myths, lies and audiotapes: some thoughts on data transcripts’. Discourse & Society 10 (4): 594–7
Collins, H. M. (1985). Changing Order: Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice. London, Sage
Cook, G. (1995). ‘Theoretical issues: transcribing the untranscribable’. In G. Leech, G. Myers, and J. Thomas, eds., Spoken English on Computer. Harlow, Longman: 35–53
Coupland, J., ed. (2000). Small Talk. Harlow, Pearson Education
Coupland, N. and V. Ylänne-McEwen (2000). ‘Talk about the weather: small talk, leisure talk, and the travel industry’. In J. Coupland, ed., Small Talk. Harlow, Pearson: 163–82
Dahlgren, P. and C. Sparks, eds. (1991). Communication and Citizenship: Journalism and the Public Sphere in the New Media Age. London, Routledge
Dayan, D. and E. Katz (1992). Media Events: The Live Broadcasting of History. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press
Delin, J. (2000). The Language of Everyday Life. London, Sage
Douglas, M. and A. Wildavsky (1982). Risk and Culture: An Essay on the Selection of Technological and Environmental Dangers. Berkeley, CA, University of California Press
Dove, J. and D. Harsent (2002). ‘When she died …’ Channel 4 (UK), August 2002
Drew, P. and K. Chilton (2000). ‘Calling just to keep in touch: regular and habitualised telephone calls as an environment for small talk’. In J. Coupland, ed., Small Talk. Harlow, Longman: 137–62
Drew, P. and J. Heritage, eds. (1992). Talk at Work: Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
Drew, P. and Holt, E. (1998). ‘Figures of speech: figurative expressions and the management of topic transition in conversation’. Language in Society 27: 495–522
Drew, P. and M.-L. Sorjonen (1997). ‘Institutional dialogue’. In T. A. van Dijk, ed., Discourse as Social Interaction. London, Sage: 92–118
Drew, P. and A. Wootton (1988). Erving Goffman: Exploring the Interaction Order. Cambridge, Polity Press
Dunbar, R. (1995). The Trouble with Science. London, Faber and Faber
Dunwoody, S. and R. J. Griffin (1993). ‘Journalistic strategies for reporting long-term environmental issues: a case study of three superfund sites’. In A. Hansen, ed., The Mass Media and Environmental Issues. Leicester, Leicester University Press: 22–50
Durant, J. and M. Bauer (1997). Public Understanding of Science in Britain: 1996 National Survey. London, The Science Museum
Duranti, A. and C. Goodwin (1992). Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon. Cambridge, England/New York, Cambridge University Press
Eagly, A. H. and S. Chaiken (1993). The Psychology of Attitudes. Fort Worth, TX, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich
Edelsky, C. (1981). ‘Who's got the floor?’ Language in Society 10: 383–421
Edwards, D. (1997). Discourse and Cognition. London, Sage
Eggins, S. and D. Slade (1997). Analysing Casual Conversation. London, Cassell
Fairclough, N. (1988). Language and Power. London, Longman
Fairclough, N.(1992). Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge, Polity Press
Fairclough, N.(1995). Media Discourse. London, Edward Arnold
Fairclough, N.(2003). Analysing Discourse: Text Analysis for Social Research. London, Routledge
Fairclough, N. and R. Wodak (1997). ‘Critical discourse analysis’. In T. A. van Dijk, ed., Discourse as Social Interaction. London, Sage: 258–84
Fowles, J. (1996). Advertising and Popular Culture. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage
Frankland, J. and M. Bloor (1999). ‘Some issues in the systematic analysis of focus group materials’. In R. S. Barbour and J. Kitzinger, eds., Developing Focus Group Research. London, Sage: 144–55
Fraser, N. (1992). ‘Rethinking the public sphere: a contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy’. In C. Calhoun, ed., Habermas and the Public Sphere. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press: 109–42
Gallup, G. H. and S. F. Rae (1940). The Pulse of Democracy: The Public Opinion Poll and How It Works. New York, Simon and Schuster
Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall
Georgakopoulou, A. and D. Goutsos (1997). Discourse Analysis: An Introduction. Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press
Gilbert, G. N. and M. Mulkay (1984). Opening Pandora's Box: A Sociological Analysis of Scientists’ Discourse. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
Ginzberg, C. (1994). ‘Killing a Chinese Mandarin: the moral implications of distance’. New Left Review (298): 107–19
Goffman, E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Garden City, NY, Doubleday
Goffman, E.(1963). Behavior in Public Places: Notes on the Social Organization of Gatherings. New York, Free Press
Goffman, E. (1971). Relations in Public: Microstudies of the Public Order. London, Penguin
Goffman, E.(1974). Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. New York, Harper and Row
Goffman, E.(1981). Forms of Talk. Oxford, Blackwell
Goodwin, C. (2000). ‘Action and embodiment within situated human interaction’. Journal of Pragmatics 32: 1489–522
Goodwin, C. and M. H. Goodwin (1990). ‘Interstitial argument’. In A. D. Grimshaw, ed., Conflict Talk: Sociolinguistic Investigations of Arguments in Conversations. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 85–117
Goodwin, C. and M. H. Goodwin(1992). ‘Assessments and the construction of context’. In A. Duranti and C. Goodwin, eds., Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 147–90
Goodwin, M. H. (1990). He-Said-She-Said: Talk as Social Organization Among Black Children. Bloomington, IN, Indiana University Press
Greatbatch, D. (1988). ‘A turn-taking system for British news interviews’. Language in Society 17 (3): 401–30
Grice, P. (1989). Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press
Gumperz, J. J. (1982). Discourse Strategies. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
Gunthner, S. (1999). ‘Polyphony and the “layering of voices” in reported dialogues: an analysis of the use of prosodic devices in everyday reported speech’. Journal of Pragmatics 31 (5): 685–708
Haarman, L., ed. (1999). Talk About Shows. Bologna, CLUEB (Cooperativa Libraria Universitaria Editrice Bologna)
Habermas, J. (1962/1989). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge, Polity Press
Hall, C., Sarangi, S., and Slembrouck, S. (1999). ‘Speech representation and the categorisation of the client in social work discourse’. Text 19: 539–70
Hamilton, H. (1998). ‘Reported speech and survivor identity in on-line bone marrow transplanation narratives’. Journal of Sociolinguistics 2 (1): 53–67
Handelsman, D. (2002). ‘Towards virtual encounter: Horton's and Wohl's “Mass communication and para-social interaction”’. In E. Katz, J. D. Peters, T. Liebes, and A. Orloff, eds., Canonic Texts in Media Research. Cambridge, Polity Press: 137–51
Harris, S. (1991). ‘Evasive action: how politicians respond to questions in political interviews’. In P. Scannell, ed., Broadcast Talk. London, Sage: 76–99
Hartford, B. S. and Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1992). ‘Closing the conversation – evidence from the academic advising session’. Discourse Processes 15 (1): 93–116
Heath, C. (1986). Body Movement and Speech in Medical Interaction. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
Herbst, S. (1993). Numbered Voices: How Opinion Polling Has Shaped American Politics. Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Press
Heritage, J. (1984a). ‘A change of state token and aspects of its sequential placement’. In J. M. Atkinson and J. Heritage, eds., Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 299–345
Heritage, J.(1984b). Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge, Polity Press
Heritage, J.(1985). ‘Analysing news interviews: aspects of the production of talk for an overhearing audience’. In T. A. van Dijk, ed., Handbook of Discourse Analysis, vol. Ⅲ. New York, Academic Press: 95–117
Heritage, J.(1997). ‘Conversation analysis and institutional talk: analysing data’. In D. Silverman, ed., Qualitative Research: Theory, Method, and Practice. London, Sage: 161–82
Hester, S. and P. Eglin, eds. (1997). Culture in Action: Studies in Membership Categorization Analysis. Lanham, MD, University Press of America
Hoijer, B. (1990). ‘Studying viewers’ reception of television programmes: theoretical and methodological considerations’. European Journal of Communications 5: 29–56
Holbrook, B. and Jackson, P. (1996). ‘Shopping around: focus group research in North London’. Area 28 (2): 136–42
Holmes, J. (2000). ‘Doing collegiality and keeping control at work: small talk in government departments’. In J. Coupland, ed., Small Talk. Harlow, Longman: 32–61
Holmes, J., M. Stubbe, and B. Vine (1999). ‘Constructing professional identity: “Doing power” in policy units’. In S. Sarangi and C. Roberts, eds., Talk, Work, and Institutional Order: Discourse in Medical, Mediation, and Management Settings. Berlin, Mouton de Gruyter: 351–85
Holt, E. (1996). ‘Reporting on talk: the use of direct reported speech in conversation’. Research on Language and Social Interaction 29 (3): 219–45
Holt, E. (1999). ‘Just gassing: an analysis of direct reported speech in a conversation between employees of a gas company’. Text 19 (4): 505–38
Hopkins, C. (1995). My Life in Advertising and Scientific Advertising. Lincolnwood, IL, NTC Business Books
Hopper, R. (1992). Telephone Conversation. Bloomington, IN, Indiana University Press
Horton, D. and Wohl, R. (1956). ‘Mass communication and para-social interaction: observations on intimacy at a distance’. Psychiatry 19: 215–29
Houtkoop-Steenstra, H. (2000). Interaction and the Standardized Survey Interview: The Living Questionnaire. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
Houtkoop-Steenstra, H. and Antaki, C. (1997). ‘Creating happy people by asking yes–no questions’. Research on Language and Social Interaction 30 (4): 285–313
Hutchby, I. (1996). Confrontation Talk: Arguments, Asymmetries, and Power on Talk Radio. Mahwah, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Hutchby, I. (2001). ‘Conversation as spectacle: the argumentative frame of the Ricky Lake Show’. In A. Tolson, ed., Television Talk Shows: Discourse, Performance, Spectacle. Mahwah, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: 155–72
Hutchby, I. and R. Wooffitt (1998). Conversation Analysis: Principles, Practices and Applications. Cambridge, Polity Press
Hyland, K. (1998). Hedging in Scientific Research Articles. Amsterdam, John Benjamins
Hymes, D. (1972). ‘Models of the interaction of language and social life’. In J. J. Gumperz and D. Hymes, eds., Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication. New York, Holt, Rinehart, and Winston: 35–71
Jacquemet, M. (1996). Credibility in Court: Communicative Practices of the Comorra Trials. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
Jefferson, G. (1984a). ‘On step-wise transition from talk about a trouble to inappropriately next-positioned matters’. In J. M. Atkinson and J. Heritage, eds., Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 191–222
Jefferson, G.(1984b). ‘On the organization of laughter in talk about troubles’. In J. M. Atkinson and J. Heritage, eds., Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 346–69
Jefferson, G., H. Sacks, and E. A. Schegloff (1987). ‘Notes on laughter in the pursuit of intimacy’. In G. Button and J. R. E. Lee, eds., Talk and Social Organisation. Clevedon, Avon, Multilingual Matters: 152–205
Johnstone, B. (1993). ‘Community and contest: Midwestern men and women creating their worlds in conversational storytelling’. In D. Tannen, ed., Gender and Conversational Interaction. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 62–80
Jucker, A. (1993). ‘The discourse marker “well”: a Relevance-Theoretical account’. Journal of Pragmatics 19: 435–52
Kasper, G. (1990). ‘Linguistic politeness: current research issues’. Journal of Pragmatics 14: 193–218
Katz, E. and P. F. Lazarsfeld (1955). Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications. Glencoe, IL, Free Press
Katz, E., J. D. Peters, T. Liebes, and A. Orloff, eds. (2003). Canonic Texts in Media Research. Cambridge, Polity Press
King, Martin Luther (1963). ‘I have a dream’, speech given at the March on Washington, Washington DC, 28 August 1963
Kitzinger, J. (1994). ‘The methodology of focus groups – the importance of interaction between research participants’. Sociology of Health and Illness 16 (1): 103–21
Kitzinger, J. (1995). ‘Qualitative research – introducing focus groups’. British Medical Journal 311 (7000): 299–302
Kitzinger, J. (1998). ‘Resisting the message: the extent and limits of media influence’. In D. Miller, J. Kitzinger, K. Williams, and P. Beharrell, eds., The Circuit of Mass Communication. London, Sage: 192–212
Kitzinger, J. and C. Farquhar (1999). ‘The analytical potential of “sensitive moments” in focus group discussions’. In R. S. Barbour and J. Kitzinger, eds., Developing Focus Group Research. London, Sage: 156–72
Klewitz, G. and Couper-Kuhlen, E. (1999). ‘Quote-unquote? The role of prosody in the contextualization of reported speech sequences’. Pragmatics 9 (4): 459–85
Kotthoff, H. (1993). ‘Disagreement and concession in disputes – on the context-sensitivity of preference structures’. Language in Society 22 (2): 193–216
Kress, G., C. Jewitt, J. Ogburn, and C. Tsatsarelis (2001). Multimodal Teaching and Learning: The Rhetorics of the Science Classroom. London, Continuum
Kress, G. and T. van Leeuwen (2001). Multi-modal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London, Arnold
Krueger, R. A. (1994). Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage
Krueger, R. A. (1998). Moderating Focus Groups. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage
Lakoff, G. (1973). ‘Hedges: a study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts’. Journal of Philosophical Logic 2: 458–508
Lakoff, R. (1973). ‘The logic of politeness, or, minding your p's and q's’. In C. Corum, T. C. Smith-Stark and A. Weiser, eds., Papers from the Ninth Regional Meeting. Chicago, Chicago Linguistics Society: 292–305
Lane, R. E. and D. O. Sears (1964). Public Opinion. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall
Latour, B. (1987). Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Milton Keynes, Open University Press
Latour, B. and S. Woolgar (1979). Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts. London, Sage
Lazarsfeld, P. (1944). ‘The controversy over detailed interviews – an offer for negotiation’. Public Opinion Quarterly 8: 38–60
Leech, G. (2000). ‘Grammars of spoken English: new outcomes of corpus-oriented research’. Language Learning 50 (4): 675–724
Leech, G. N. and M. Short (1981). Style in Fiction: A Linguistic Introduction to English Fictional Prose. London, Longman
Leudar, I. and Antaki, C. (1996). ‘Backing footing.’ Theory & Psychology 6 (1): 41–6
Levinson, S. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
Levinson, S. (1988). ‘Putting linguistics on a proper footing: explorations in Goffman's concepts of participation’. In P. Drew and A. Wootton, eds., Erving Goffman: Exploring the Interaction Order. Cambridge, Polity Press: 161–227
Levinson, S. (1992). ‘Activity types and language’. In P. Drew and J. Heritage, eds., Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 66–100
Liebes, T. and J. Curran (1998). Media, Ritual and Identity. London, Routledge
Lippmann, W. (1922). Public Opinion. New York; London, Free Press
Livingstone, S. and P. Lunt (1994). Talk on Television: Audience Participation and Public Debate. London, Routledge
Low, G. (1999). ‘What respondents do with questionnaires: accounting for incongruity and fluidity’. Applied Linguistics 20 (4): 503–33
Lucy, J. A. (1993). Reflexive Language: Reported Speech and Metapragmatics. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
Luhmann, N. (2000). The Reality of the Mass Media. Cambridge, Polity Press
Lury, A. (1994). ‘Advertising: moving beyond the stereotypes’. In R. Keat, N. Whiteley and N. Abercrombie, eds., The Authority of the Consumer. London, Routledge: 91–101
Lynch, M. and D. Bogen (1997). ‘Lies, recollections, and categorical judgements in testimony’. In S. Hester and P. Eglin, eds., Culture in Action: Studies in Membership Categorization Analysis. Lanham, MD, University Press of America: 99–121
Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
Macgregor, B. and Morrison, D. E. (1995). ‘From focus groups to editing groups – a new method of reception analysis’. Media Culture & Society 17 (1): 141–50
Macnaghten, P., R. Grove-White, M. Jacobs, and B. Wynne (1995). Public Perceptions and Sustainability in Lancashire: Indicators, Institutions, Perceptions. Lancaster, Centre for the Study of Environmental Change, Lancaster University
Macnaghten, P. and G. Myers (2004). ‘Focus groups: the moderator's view and the analyst's view’. In J. G. Giampietro Gobo, Clive Seale, David Silverman, eds., Qualitative Research Practice. London, Sage: 65–79
Malone, M., J. (1997). Worlds of Talk: The Presentation of Self in Everyday Conversation. Cambridge, Polity Press
Marriott, S. (2000). ‘Election night’. Media Culture & Society 22: 131–48
Matoesian, G. M. (2000). ‘Intertextual authority in reported speech’. Journal of Pragmatics 32: 879–914
Matoesian, G. M. and Coldren, J. R. J. (2002). ‘Language and bodily conduct in focus groups evaluations of legal policy’. Discourse & Society 13 (4): 469–93
May, R. M. and R. Pitts (2000). ‘Communicating science behind the global change issues’. In J. Smith, ed., The Daily Globe: Environmental Change, the Public, and the Media. London, Earthscan: 15–25
Maybin, J. (1997). ‘Story voices: the use of reported speech in 10–12 year olds’ spontaneous narratives’. Current Issues in Language and Society 3: 36–48
Maybin, J. (1999). ‘Framing and evaluation in ten- to twelve-year-old school children's use of repeated, appropriated, and reported speech in relation to their induction into educational procedures and practices’. Text 19 (4): 459–84
Maynard, D. W. (1980). ‘Placement of topic changes in conversation’. Semiotica 30: 263–90
Maynard, D. W. (1984). Inside Plea Bargaining: The Language of Negotiation. New York, Plenum
Maynard, D. W. (1997). ‘The news delivery sequence: bad news and good news in conversational interaction’. Research on Language and Social Interaction 30 (2): 93–130
Maynard, D. W. and Zimmerman, D. H. (1984). ‘Topical talk, ritual, and the social organization of relationships’. Social Psychology Quarterly 47: 301–16
McCarthy, M. (1998). Spoken Language and Applied Linguistics. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
McGuigan, J. (1998). ‘What price the public sphere?’ In D. K. Thussu, ed., Electronic Empires: Global Media and Local Resistance. London, Arnold: 81–107
McHoul, A. (1978). ‘The organisation of turns at formal talk in the classroom’. Language in Society 19: 183–213
Mehan, H. (1979). Learning Lessons: Social Organization in the Classroom. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press
Meinhof, U. and Galasinski, D. (2000). ‘Memory and the construction of identities on the former East-West German Border’. Discourse Studies 2: 323–53
Mercer, N. (2000). Words and Minds: How We Use Language to Think Together. London, Routledge
Merton, R. K. (1987). ‘The focused interview and focus groups – continuities and discontinuities’. Public Opinion Quarterly 51 (4): 550–66
Merton, R. K., M. Fiske, and P. L. Kendall (1956). The Focused Interview: A Manual of Problems and Procedures. New York, Free Press: London, Collier Macmillan
Merton, R. K. and Kendall, P. L. (1946). ‘The focused interview’. American Journal of Sociology 51: 541–57
Meyrowitz, J. (1985). No Sense of Place: The Impact of Electronic Media on Social Behavior. New York, Oxford University Press
Michael, M. (1996). ‘Ignoring science: discourses of ignorance in the public understanding of science’. In A. Irwin and B. Wynne, eds., Misunderstanding Science: The Public Reconstruction of Science and Technology. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 107–25
Middleton, D. and D. Edwards, eds. (1990). Collective Remembering. London, Sage
Miller, D., J. Kitzinger, K. Williams, and P. Beharrell (1998). The Circuit of Mass Communication. London, Sage
Mitchell, P. (1998). ‘Authorial voice in radio news: a framework for the linguistic and pragmatic analysis of “Objective” discourse representation’. PhD dissertation, Centre for Language and Communication, Cardiff University
Mitchell-Kiernan, C. (1972). ‘Signifying and marking: two Afro-American speech acts’. In J. J. Gumperz and D. Hymes, eds., Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication. Oxford, Blackwell: 161–79
Moerman, M. (1988). Talking Culture: Ethnography and Conversation Analysis. Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Press
Mondada, L. (1995). ‘L’entretien comme lieu de negotiation d’objets de discours’. Cahiers de Linguistique Sociale (28–9): 219–24
Montgomery, M. (1985). ‘DJ Talk’. Media Culture & Society 8: 421–40
Montgomery, M. (1999). ‘Speaking sincerely: public reactions to the death of Diana’. Language and Literature 8: 5–34
Morgan, D. L. (1988). Focus Groups as Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage
Morgan, D. L. and R. A. Krueger (1993). ‘When to use focus groups and why’. In D. L. Morgan, ed., Successful Focus Groups. Newbury Park, CA, Sage: 3–19
Morgan, D. L. and R. A. Krueger (1998). The Focus Group Kit. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage
Morrison, D. (1998). The Search for a Method: Focus Groups and the Development of Mass Communication Research. Luton, University of Luton Press
Muhlhausler, R. and R. Harre (1990). Pronouns and People. Oxford, Blackwell
Mulkay, M. (1979). Science and the Sociology of Knowledge. London, George Allen and Unwin
Myers, G. (1998). ‘Displaying opinions: topics and disagreement in focus groups’. Language in Society 27 (1): 85–111
Myers, G. (1999). Ad Worlds: Brands, Media, Audiences. London, Arnold
Myers, G. (2000a). ‘Becoming a group: face and sociability in moderated discussions’. In S. Sarangi and M. Coulthard, eds., Discourse and Social Life. Harlow, Pearson Education: 121–37
Myers, G. (2000b). ‘Entitlement and sincerity in broadcast interviews about Princess Diana’. Media Culture & Society 22 (2): 167–85
Myers, G. (2000c). Talking to Strangers: Constructing Local Place in Focus Group Discussions. Sociolinguistics Symposium 2000, Bristol
Myers, G. (2000d). ‘Unspoken speech: hypothetical reported discourse and the rhetoric of everyday talk’. Text 19: 571–90
Myers, G. (2001). ‘“I’m out of it; you guys argue”: making an issue of it in the Jerry Springer Show’. In A. Tolson, ed., Television Talk Shows: Discourse, Performance, Spectacle. Mahwah, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: 173–92
Myers, G. (2002). ‘“In My Opinion”: the place of personal views in undergraduate essays’. In M. Hewings, ed., Academic Writing in Context: Implications and Applications. Papers in Honour of Tony Dudley-Evans. Birmingham, University of Birmingham Press: 63–78
Myers, G. (2003). ‘Vox Pop Interviews in Media Events’. Paper presented at conference. Staging Reality, Stirling Media Centre
Myers, G. and Macnaghten, P. (1998). ‘Rhetorics of environmental sustainability: commonplaces and places’. Environment and Planning A 30 (2): 333–53
Myers, G. and P. Macnaghten (1999). ‘Can focus groups be analysed as talk?’ In R. S. Barbour and J. Kitzinger, eds., Developing Focus Group Research: Politics, Theory and Practice. London, Sage: 173–85
Ochs, E. (1979). ‘Transcription as theory’. In E. Ochs and B. Schieffelin, eds., Developmental Pragmatics. New York, Academic Press: 43–72
Connell, D. C. and Kowal, S. (2000). ‘Are transcripts reproducible?’ Pragmatics 10: 247–69
Ogburn, J., G. Kress, I. Martins, and K. McGillicuddy (1996). Explaining Science in the Classroom. Buckingham, Open University Press
Ogilvy, D. (1983). Ogilvy on Advertising. London, Pan Books
Petts, J., T. Horlick-Jones and G. Murdock (2001). ‘The social amplification of risk’. London, Health and Safety Executive. http://www.hse.gov.uk/research/crr.pdf/2001/crr01329.pdf
Philips, S. (1993). ‘Evidentiary standards for American trials: just the facts’. In J. Hill and J. Irvine, eds., Responsibility and Evidence in Oral Discourse. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 248–59
Pidgeon, N., J. Walls, A. Weyman, and T. Horlick-Jones (2003). Perceptions of and Trust in the Health and Safety Executive as a Risk regulator. London, Health and Safety Executive. http://www.hse.gov.uk/research/rrpdf/rr100.pdf
Pomerantz, A. (1980). ‘Telling my side: “limited access” as a fishing device’. Sociological Inquiry 50: 186–98
Pomerantz, A. (1984). ‘Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes’. In J. M. Atkinson and J. Heritage, eds., Structures of Social Action. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 57–101
Pomerantz, A. (1986). ‘Extreme case formulations: a way of legitimising claims’. Human Studies 9: 219–30
Potter, J. (1996). Representing Reality: Discourse, Rhetoric and Social Construction. London, Sage
Potter, J. and M. Wetherell (1987). Discourse and Social Psychology: Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour. London, Sage
Psathas, G. (1995). Conversation Analysis: The Study of Talk-in-Interaction. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage
Puchta, C. and Potter, J. (1999). ‘Asking elaborate questions: focus groups and the management of spontaneity.’ Journal of Sociolinguistics 3: 314–35
Puchta, C. and J. Potter (2003). Focus Group Moderation: Discourse, Opinion, and Market Research. London, Sage
Ravatsos, D. and Berkenkotter, C. (1999). ‘Voices in the text: the uses of reported speech in psychotherapists’ initial assessments’. Text 18 (2): 211–39
Richards, J., S. Wilson, and L. Woodhead (1999). Diana, the Making of a Media Saint. London/New York, I. B. Tauris
Richardson, K. (2001). ‘Risk news in the world of Internet news groups’. Journal of Sociolinguistics 2: 50–72
Richardson, K. (2003). ‘Health risks on the Internet: establishing credibility on-line’. Health Risk and Society 5 (2): 171–84
Roberts, C. (2000). ‘Professional gatekeeping in intercultural encounters’. In S. Sarangi and M. Coulthard, eds., Discourse and Social Life. Harlow, Longman: 102–20
Roberts, C. and S. Sarangi (1999). ‘Hybridity in gatekeeping discourse: issues of practical relevance for the researcher’. In S. Sarangi and C. Roberts, eds., Talk, Work and Institutional Order: Discourse in Medical, Mediation and Management Settings. Berlin, Mouton de Gruyter: 473–503
Roth, A. (2002). ‘Social epistemology in broadcast news interviews’. Language in Society 31: 355–81
Rothenberg, R. (1994). Where the Suckers Moon: An Advertising Story. New York, Knopf
Royal Society of London (1985). ‘The public understanding of science’. London, The Royal Society
Royal Society of London (1992). ‘Risk: analysis, perception, management’. London, The Royal Society
Sacks, H. (1972). ‘An initial investigation of the usability of conversational data for doing sociology’. In D. Sudnow, ed., Studies in Social Interaction. New York, Free Press: 31–74
Sacks, H. (1978). ‘Some technical considerations of a dirty joke’. In J. N. Schenkein, ed., Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction. New York, Academic Press: 249–70
Sacks, H. (1987). ‘On the preferences for agreement and contiguity in sequences in conversation’. In G. Button and J. R. E. Lee, eds., Talk and Social Organisation. Clevedon, Avon, Multilingual Matters: 54–69
Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on Conversation. Oxford, Blackwell
Saville-Troike, M. (1989). The Ethnography of Communication. Oxford, Blackwell
Scannell, P. (1991). Broadcast Talk. London, Sage
Scannell, P. (1996). Radio, Television and Modern Life: A Phenomenological Approach. Oxford, Blackwell
Scannell, P. (2000). ‘For-anyone-as-someone structures’. Media Culture & Society 22: 5–24
Schegloff, E. A. (1968). ‘Sequencing in conversational openings’. American Anthropologist 70: 1075–95
Schegloff, E. A. (1972). ‘Notes on a conversational practice: formulating place’. In D. Sudnow, ed., Studies in Social Interaction. New York, Free Press: 75–119
Schegloff, E. A. (1982). ‘Discourse as an interactional achievement: some uses of ‘uh huh’ and other things that come between sentences’. In D. Tannen, ed., Analyzing Discourse: Text and Talk. Washington, DC, Georgetown University Press: 71–93
Schegloff, E. A. (1984). ‘On some questions and ambiguities in conversation’. In J. M. Atkinson and J. Heritage, eds., Structures of Social Action. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 28–52
Schegloff, E. A. (1997). ‘Whose text? Whose context?’ Discourse & Society 8 (2): 165–87
Schegloff, E. A. (2000). ‘Overlapping talk and the organization of turn-taking for conversation’. Language in Society 29 (1): 1–63
Schegloff, E. A. and Sacks, H. (1973). ‘Opening up closings’. Semiotica 8: 289–327
Schiffrin, D. (1984). ‘Jewish argument as sociability’. Language in Society 13 (3): 311–35
Schiffrin, D. (1987). Discourse Markers. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
Schiffrin, D. (1990). ‘The management of a co-operative self during argument: the role of opinions and stories’. In A. D. Grimshaw, ed., Conflict Talk: Sociolinguistic Investigations of Arguments in Conversations. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 241–59
Schiffrin, D. (1993). ‘“Speaking for another” in sociolinguistic interviews: alignments, identities, and frames’. In D. Tannen, ed., Framing in Discourse. Oxford, Oxford University Press: 231–63
Schiffrin, D. (1994). Approaches to Discourse. Oxford, Blackwell
Schiffrin, D. (1996). ‘Narrative as self-portrait: sociolinguistic constructions of identity’. Language in Society 25 (2): 167–203
Schudson, M. (1984). Advertising: The Uneasy Persuasion. New York, Basic Books
Schudson, M. (1998). The Good Citizen: A History of American Civic Life. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press
Scollon, R. (1998). Mediated Discourse as Social Interaction: A Study of News Discourse. Harlow, Longman
Scollon, R. and S. W. Scollon (2003). Discourses in Place: Language in the Material World. London, Routledge
Semino, E., Short, M., and Culpeper, J. (1997). ‘Using a corpus to test a model of speech and thought presentation’. Poetics 25: 17–43
Semino, E., Short, M., and Wynne, M. (1999). ‘Hypothetical words and thoughts in contemporary British narratives’. Narrative 7 (3): 307–34
Short, M. (1988). ‘Speech presentation, the novel, and the press’. In W. van Peer, ed., The Taming of the Text. London, Routledge
Short, M., M. Wynne, and E. Semino (1999). ‘Reading reports: discourse presentation in a corpus of narratives, with special reference to news reports’. In Hans Jurgen Diller and Erwin Otto Gert Stratmann, eds., English via Various Media (Anglistik & Englischunterricht). Heidelberg, Universitatsverlag C. Winter: 39–66
Shotter, J. (1993). Conversational Realities: Constructing Life Through Language. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage
Shuman, A. (1993). ‘“Get outta my face”: entitlement and authoritative discourse’. In J. Hill and J. Irvine, eds., Responsibility and Evidence in Oral Discourse. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
Silverman, D. (1998). Harvey Sacks: Social Science and Conversation Analysis. Cambridge, Polity Press
Simmel, G. (1949). ‘The sociology of sociability’. American Journal of Sociology 55 (3)
Sinclair, J. and M. Coulthard (1975). Towards an Analysis of Discourse: The English Used by Teachers and Pupils. Oxford, Oxford University Press
Slembrouck, S. (1992). ‘The parliamentary Hansard “verbatim” report: the written construction of spoken language’. Language and Literature 1 (2): 101–19
Slembrouck, S. (1999). ‘Translation, direct quotation and decontextualisation (reported speech, process of translation, cultural criteria)’. Perspectives-Studies in Translatology 7 (1): 81–108
Sparks, C. (1998). ‘Is there a global public sphere?’ In D. K. Thussu, ed., Electronic Empires: Global Media and Local Resistance. London, Arnold: 108–24
Sperber, D. and D. Wilson (1981). ‘Irony and the use-mention distinction’. In P. Cole, ed., Radical Pragmatics. London, Academic Press: 295–318
Stubbs, M. (1996). Text and Corpus Analysis: Computer Assisted Studies of Language and Institutions. Oxford, Blackwell
Stubbs, M. (2001). Words and Phrases: Corpus Studies of Lexical Semantics. Oxford, Blackwell
Suchman, L. and Jordan, B. (1990). ‘Interactional troubles in face-to-face survey interviews’. Journal of the American Statistical Association 85 (409): 232–41
Summerfield, P. (1998). Reconstructing Women's Wartime Lives: Discourse and Subjectivity in Oral Histories of the Second World War. Manchester, Manchester University Press
Szerszynski, B. (1999). ‘Risk and trust: the performative dimension’. Environmental Values 8 (2): 239–52
Szerszynski, B., J. Urry, and G. Myers (2000). ‘Mediating global citizenship’. In J. Smith, eds., The Daily Globe: Environmental Change, the Public, and the Media. London, Earthscan: 97–114
Tannen, D. (1984). Conversational Style: Analyzing Talk Among Friends. Norwood, NJ, Ablex
Tannen, D. (1989). Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
Tannen, D. ed. (1993). Gender and Conversational Interaction. Oxford, Oxford University Press
Tannen, D. and Wallat, C. (1987). ‘Interactive frames and knowledge schema in interaction: examples from a medical examination/interview’. Social Psychology Quarterly 50: 205–16
ten Have, P. (1991). ‘Talk and institution: a reconsideration of the “asymmetry” of doctor–patient interaction’. In D. Boden and P. Zimmerman, eds., Talk and Social Structure; Studies in Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis. Cambridge, Polity Press: 138–63
ten Have, P. (1999a). Doing Conversation Analysis: A Practical Guide. London, Sage
ten Have, P. (1999b). ‘In the presence of the data’. Paper presented at conference. Ethnomethodology: An Improbable Science, Cerisy la Salles, France. http://www2.fmg.uva.n1/emca/presence.htm
Thomas, J. (1995). Meaning in Interaction: An Introduction to Pragmatics. Harlow, Longman
Thompson, G. (1996). ‘Voices in the text: discourse perspectives on language reports’. Applied Linguistics 17 (4): 501–30
Thompson, J. (1995). The Media and Modernity. Cambridge, Polity Press
Thornborrow, J. (1997). ‘Having their say: the function of stories in talk show discourse’. Text 17: 241–62
Thornborrow, J. (2000). ‘The construction of conflicting accounts in public participation TV’. Language in Society 29 (3): 357–77
Thornborrow, J. (2002). Power Talk: Language and Interaction in Institutional Discourse. Harlow, Longman
Times, The (1999). ‘Internet offers a new world of democracy’ (by Philip Gould), 15 November: 17
Titscher, S., M. Meyer, R. Wodak, and E. Vetter (2000). Methods of Text and Discourse Analysis. London, Sage
Tolson, A. (2001). Television Talk Shows: Discourse, Performance, Spectacle. Mahwah, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Tomlin, R. S., L. Forrest, M. M. Pu, and M. H. Kim (1997). ‘Discourse semantics’. In T. A. van Dijk, ed., Discourse as Structure and Process. London, Sage: 63–111
Tracy, K. and J. M. Naughton (2000). ‘Institutional identity-work: a better lens’. In J. Coupland, ed., Small Talk. Harlow, Longman: 62–83
Turnock, R. (2000). Interpreting Diana: Television Audiences and the Death of a Princess. London, British Film Institute
van Dijk, T. A. (1997a). Discourse as Social Interaction. London, Sage
van Dijk, T. A. (1997b). Discourse as Stucture and Process. London, Sage
van Dijk, T. A., S. Ting-Toomey, G. Smitherman, and D. Troutman (1997). ‘Discourse, ethnicity, culture, and racism’. In T. A. van Dijk, ed., Discourse as Social Interaction. London, Sage: 144–80
Volosinov, V. N. (1986). Marxism and the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press
Walter, T. (1999). The Mourning for Diana. Oxford, UK/New York, Berg
Waterton, C. and B. Wynne (1999). ‘Can focus groups access community views?’ In R. S. Barbour and J. Kitzinger, eds., Developing Focus Group Research. London, Sage: 127–43
Wetherell, M. and J. Potter (1992). Mapping the Language of Racism: Discourse and the Legitimation of Exploitation. London, Harvester/Wheatsheaf
Wetherell, M., S. Taylor, and S. Yates, eds. (2002). Discourse as Data. London, Sage
Wilkinson, S. (1998). ‘Focus groups in feminist research: power, interaction, and the co-construction of meaning’. Women's Studies International Forum 21: 111–25
Wilkinson, S. (1999). ‘How useful are focus groups in feminist research?’ In R. Barbour and J. Kitzinger, eds., Developing Focus Group Research: Politics, Theory, and Practice. London, Sage: 64–78
Williamson, J. (1978). Decoding Advertisements: Ideology and Meaning in Advertising. London, Marion Boyars
Wodak, R. (1996). Disorders of Discourse. Harlow, Longman
Wodak, R., R. de Cillia, M. Reisigl, and K. Liebhart (1999). The Discursive Construction of National Identity. Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press
Wodak, R. and M. Meyer, eds. (2001). Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London, Sage
Wooffitt, R. (1992). Telling Tales of the Unexpected: Accounts of Paranormal Experiences. Hemel Hempstead, Harvester/Wheatsheaf
Wooffitt, R. (2001). ‘Researching psychic practitioners: Conversation Analysis’. In M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, and S. Yates, eds., Discourse as Data: A Guide for Analysis. London, Sage: 49–92
Woolgar, S. (1988). Science: The Very Idea. Chichester, Ellis Horwood: Tavistock Publications
Worcester, R. (2000). ‘Public and “expert” opinion on environmental issues’. In J. Smith, ed., The Daily Globe: Environmental Change, the Public, and the Media. London, Earthscan: 33–45
Wynne, B. (1995). ‘Public understanding of science’. In S. Jasanoff, G. E. Markle, J. C. Peterson and T. Pinch, eds., Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage: 361–88
Wynne, B. (1996a). ‘May sheep safely graze? A reflexive view of the expert-lay knowledge divide’. In S. Lash, B. Szerszynski and B. Wynne, eds., Risk, Environment, and Modernity. London, Sage: 44–83
Wynne, B. (1996b). ‘Misunderstood misunderstandings: social identities and the public uptake of science’. In A. Irwin and B. Wynne, eds., Misunderstanding Science? The Public Reconstruction of Science and Technology. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 19–46
Wynne, B. (2001). ‘Creating public alienation: expert cultures of risk and ethics on GMOs’. Science as Culture 10: 445–81
Yngve, V. H. (1970). ‘On getting a word in edgewise’. In Papers from the 6th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society. Chicago, Chicago Linguistics Society: 567–78
Young, I. M. (1996). ‘Communication and the other: beyond deliberative democracy’. Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political. S. Benhabib, ed. Princeton, Princeton University Press: 120–36
Yule, G., Mathis, T., and Hopkins, M. F. (1992). ‘On reporting what was said’. ELT Journal 46 (3): 245–51
