Crossref Citations
This Book has been
cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
Eizagirre, Victor Hidalgo
2000.
Gogoetak 'hitzen ordena eta esaldien egitura informatiboaz' prosodiaren laguntzaz.
Lapurdum,
p.
113.
Rossi, Mario
2001.
6. L’intonation.
Modèles linguistiques,
Vol. XXII-1,
Issue. 43,
p.
103.
Cristo, Albert Di
2003.
De la métrique et du rythme de la parole ordinaire : l’exemple du français.
Semen,
Cook, N.D.
Fujisawa, T.X.
and
Takami, K.
2006.
Evaluation of the affective valence of speech using pitch substructure.
IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech and Language Processing,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
142.
Robert Ladd, D.
2008.
Sun-Ah Jun (ed.) (2005). Prosodic typology: the phonology of intonation and phrasing. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ix+462..
Phonology,
Vol. 25,
Issue. 2,
p.
372.
Duběda, Tomáš
2009.
L’accent initial en tchèque et en français : un cas de transfert positif ?.
Acquisition et interaction en langue étrangère,
p.
43.
Arvaniti, Amalia
and
Ladd, D. Robert
2009.
Greek wh-questions and the phonology of intonation.
Phonology,
Vol. 26,
Issue. 1,
p.
43.
Chen, Aoju
2009.
Intonation and reference maintenance in Turkish learners of Dutch: a first insight.
Acquisition et interaction en langue étrangère,
p.
67.
Turk, Alice
2009.
Is prosodythe music of speech?Advocating a functional perspective.
International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology,
Vol. 11,
Issue. 4,
p.
316.
2009.
PUBLICATIONS RECEIVED.
English Language and Linguistics,
Vol. 13,
Issue. 1,
p.
153.
Jackendoff, Ray
2009.
Parallels and Nonparallels between Language and Music.
Music Perception,
Vol. 26,
Issue. 3,
p.
195.
Dilley, Laura C.
2009.
Phonology,
Vol. 26,
Issue. 3,
p.
535.
Cole, Jennifer
Mo, Yoonsook
and
Baek, Soondo
2010.
The role of syntactic structure in guiding prosody perception with ordinary listeners and everyday speech.
Language and Cognitive Processes,
Vol. 25,
Issue. 7-9,
p.
1141.
Sicoli, Mark A.
2010.
Shifting voices with participant roles: Voice qualities and speech registers in Mesoamerica.
Language in Society,
Vol. 39,
Issue. 4,
p.
521.
Calhoun, Sasha
2010.
How does informativeness affect prosodic prominence?.
Language and Cognitive Processes,
Vol. 25,
Issue. 7-9,
p.
1099.
Hove, Michael J.
Sutherland, Mary Elizabeth
and
Krumhansl, Carol L.
2010.
Ethnicity effects in relative pitch.
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,
Vol. 17,
Issue. 3,
p.
310.
Bauer, Matthias
Knape, Joachim
Koch, Peter
and
Winkler, Susanne
2010.
Dimensionen der Ambiguität.
Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik,
Vol. 40,
Issue. 2,
p.
7.
Wagner, Michael
and
Watson, Duane G.
2010.
Experimental and theoretical advances in prosody: A review.
Language and Cognitive Processes,
Vol. 25,
Issue. 7-9,
p.
905.
Barnes, Jonathan
Veilleux, Nanette
Brugos, Alejna
and
Shattuck-Hufnagel, Stefanie
2010.
Turning points, tonal targets, and the English L- phrase accent.
Language and Cognitive Processes,
Vol. 25,
Issue. 7-9,
p.
982.
Dehé, Nicole
2010.
The nature and use of Icelandic prenuclear and nuclear pitch accents: Evidence from F0 alignment and syllable/segment duration.
Nordic Journal of Linguistics,
Vol. 33,
Issue. 1,
p.
31.