Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Books
  3. Immigration and the American Ethos
  • Cited by 17
Publisher:
Cambridge University Press
Online publication date:
January 2020
Print publication year:
2020
Online ISBN:
9781108772174
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108772174
Subjects:
Area Studies, American Studies, American Government, Politics and Policy, Politics and International Relations, Psychology: General Interest
Series:
Cambridge Studies in Public Opinion and Political Psychology
Information

Book description

What do Americans want from immigration policy and why? In the rise of a polarized and acrimonious immigration debate, leading accounts see racial anxieties and disputes over the meaning of American nationhood coming to a head. The resurgence of parochial identities has breathed new life into old worries about the vulnerability of the American Creed. This book tells a different story, one in which creedal values remain hard at work in shaping ordinary Americans' judgements about immigration. Levy and Wright show that perceptions of civic fairness - based on multiple, often competing values deeply rooted in the country's political culture - are the dominant guideposts by which most Americans navigate immigration controversies most of the time and explain why so many Americans simultaneously hold a mix of pro-immigrant and anti-immigrant positions. The authors test the relevance and force of the theory over time and across issue domains.

Reviews

'In recent years, immigration has become a front-burner political issue in the US. A growing body of research argues that Americans' attitudes about immigration are fundamentally about their views on different ethnic and racial groups, but in this far-reaching and illuminating book, Levy and Wright provide a sweeping challenge to group-oriented accounts of public opinion on immigration and demonstrate convincingly that values play a central role. This book methodically builds a timely, compelling alternative to group-centered accounts of attitudes, one that will reshape how scholars and citizens alike think about immigration and public opinion in general.'

Daniel J. Hopkins - University of Pennsylvania

'In this theoretically subtle and carefully crafted empirical work, Levy and Wright advance a more complete analysis of Americans’ immigration attitudes than is common in scholarship and public discourse. They make important, provocative, even controversial, claims: ‘ideas’ or ideals often trump ‘interests’ in attitudes toward immigrants and ‘civic fairness’ is as (or more) important than group-centrism. This is a significant contribution that deeply informs and challenges our understanding of enduring issues in American politics.'

Rodney E. Hero - Arizona State University

'This book provides crucial new evidence that helps explain Americans' complex opinions on immigration.'

John Sides - Vanderbilt University

‘The book is extensively researched and the authors' contentions are well founded …’

R. F. Zeidel Source: Choice

‘Immigration and the American Ethos is a must-read.’

Tom K. Wong Source: American Politics

Refine List

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

Contents

Contents
References

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.