References
Agarwal, B. (2001). Participatory Exclusions, Community Forestry, and Gender: An Analysis for South Asia and a Conceptual Framework. World Development, 29(10), 1623–1648.
Agrawala, S. (1998). Structural and Process History of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Climatic Change, 39, 621–642.
Allum, N., Sturgis, P., Tabourazi, D., and Brunton-Smith, I.. (2008). Science Knowledge and Attitudes across Cultures: A Meta-analysis. Public Understanding of Science, 17, 35–54.
Anderson, E. (2006). The Epistemology of Democracy. Episteme: A Journal of Social Epistemology, 3(1–2), 8–22.
Arendt, H. (1958). What Was Authority? In Friedrich, C. J., ed., Authority. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 81–112.
Arendt, H. (2006). Between Past and Future. London: Penguin.
Aristotle, . (1984). Rhetoric. In Barnes, J., ed., The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation, vol. 2. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Aristotle, . (1996). The Politics and the Constitution of Athens. Ed. Everson, Stephen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A Ladder of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224.
Bächtiger, A. (2014). On Perfecting the Deliberative Process: The (Essential) Virtues and (Non-Negligible) Vices of Contestation. Unpublished manuscript.
Bächtiger, A., Niemeyer, S., Neblo, M., Steenbergen, M. R., and Steiner, J.. (2010). Disentangling Diversity in Deliberative Democracy: Competing Theories, Their Blind Spots and Complementarities. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 18(1), 32–63.
Barben, D., Fisher, E., Selin, C., and Guston, D. H.. (2008). Anticipatory Governance of Nanotechnology: Foresight, Engagement, and Integration. In Hackett, E. J., Amsterdamska, O., Lynch, M., and Wajcman, J., eds., The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, Third Edition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 979–1000.
Barber, B. (1984). Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
Barnes, B., and Edge, D., eds. (1982). Science in Context: Readings in the Sociology of Science. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Barnett, A., and Carty, P.. (2008). The Athenian Option: Radical Reform for the House of Lords. Exeter: Imprint Academic.
Bauer, M., Allum, N., and Miller, S.. (2007). What Can We Learn from 25 Years of PUS Survey Research? Liberating and Expanding the Agenda. Public Understanding of Science, 16, 79–95.
Beatty, J. (2006). Masking Disagreement among Scientific Experts. Episteme, 3, 52–67.
Beck, U. (1992). Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi.
Benhabib, S. (1996). Toward a Deliberative Model of Democratic Legitimacy. In Benhabib, S., ed., Democracy and Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Bohman, J. (1996) Public Deliberation: Pluralism, Complexity, and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Bohman, J. (1998). Survey Article: The Coming of Age of Deliberative Democracy. Journal of Political Philosophy, 6(4), 400–425.
Bohman, J. (1999). Democracy as Inquiry, Inquiry as Democratic: Pragmatism, Social Science, and the Cognitive Division of Labor. American Journal of Political Science, 43(2), 590–607.
Bohman, J. (2005a). Legitimate Institutions for Democratic Renewal: Constitutional, Democratic, and Deliberative. Paper presented to the Citizen-Designed Democratic Processes Workshop, Peter Wall Institute, University of British Columbia. 10–11 June.
Bohman, J. (2005b). From Demos to Demoi: Democracy Across Borders. Ratio Juris, 18, 293–314.
Bohman, J. (2006). Deliberative Democracy and the Epistemic Benefits of Diversity. Episteme, 3(3), 175–191.
Bohman, J., and Richardson, H. S.. (2009). Liberalism, Deliberative Democracy, and ‘Reasons that All Can Accept’. Journal of Political Philosophy, 17(3), 253–274.
Bouvier, A. (2010). Passive Consensus and Active Commitment in the Sciences. Episteme, 7(3), 185–197.
Braun, K., and Schultz, S.. (2010). ‘… a certain amount of engineering involved’: Constructing the Public in Participatory Governance Arrangements. Public Understanding of Science, 19(4), 403–419.
Brewer, S. (1998). Scientific Expert Testimony and Intellectual Due Process. Yale Law Journal, 107, 1535–1679.
Brown, M. B. (2008). Fairly Balanced: The Politics of Representation on Government Advisory Committees. Political Research Quarterly, 61(4), 547–560.
Brown, M. B. (2009). Science in Democracy: Expertise, Institutions and Representation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Brown, M. B. (2013). Review of Philip Kitcher, Science in a Democratic Society. Minerva, 51, 389–397.
Brown, M. B. (2014). Expertise and Deliberative Democracy. In Elstub, S. and McLaverty, P., eds., Deliberative Democracy: Issues and Cases. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 50–68.
Brown, M. B. (2015). Politicizing Science: Conceptions of Politics in Science and Technology Studies. Social Studies of Science, 45(1), 3–30.
Brown, P. (1992). Popular Epidemiology and Toxic Waste Contamination: Lay and Professional Ways of Knowing. Journal of Health and Social Behaviour, 33(3), 267–281.
Brown, P., Zavestoski, S., McCormick, S., Mayer, B., Morello-Frosch, R., and Altman, R. Gasior. (2004). Embodied Health Movements: New Approaches to Social Movements in Health. Sociology of Health & Illness, 26, 50–80.
Bucchi, M. (1998). Of Deficits, Deviations and Dialogues: Theories of Public Communication of Science. In Bucchi, M. and Trench, B., (eds.), Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, pp. 57–76.
Bucchi, M. (2009). Beyond Technocracy: Science, Politics and Citizens. Dordrecht: Springer.
Burgess, M. (2011). Full Circle: The Emphasis on Trustworthy Expertise in Public Deliberations on Biotechnology. Paper presented at workshop on Scientific Authority in Democratic Societies, Peter Wall Institute, University of British Columbia, 27–28 June.
Bush, V. (1945). A Report to the President by Vannevar Bush, Director of the Office of Scientific Research and Development. Washington: United States Government Printing Office.
Callon, M. (1999). The Role of Lay People in the Production and Dissemination of Scientific Knowledge. Science, Technology & Society, 4(1), 81–94.
Callon, M., Lascoumes, P., and Barthe, Y.. (2009). Acting in an Uncertain World: An Essay on Technical Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chambers, S. (2004). Behind Closed Doors: Publicity, Secrecy and the Quality of Deliberation. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 12(4), 389–410.
Christiano, T. (2012). Rational Deliberation among Experts and Citizens. In Parkinson, J. and Mansbridge, J., eds., Deliberative Systems: Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 27–51.
Cohen, J. (1989). Belief and Acceptance. Mind, 98, 367–389.
Cohen, J. (1992). An Essay on Belief and Acceptance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cohen, J. (1997 [1989]). Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy. In Bohman, J. and Rehg, W., eds., Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 67–92.
Cohen, J. (2009). Reflections on Deliberative Democracy. In Christiano, T. and Christman, J., eds., Contemporary Debates in Political Philosophy. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell, pp. 247–264.
Collins, H., and Evans, R.. (2007). Rethinking Expertise. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
Cooke, M. (1994). Language and Reason: A Study of Habermas’s Pragmatics. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Crouch, C. (2004). Post-Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Cutler, F., Johnston, R., Carty, R. K., Blais, A., and Fournier, P.. (2008). Deliberation, Information, and Trust: The British Columbia Citizens’ Assembly as Agenda Setter. In Warren, M. E. and Pearse, H., eds., Designing Deliberative Democracy: The British Columbia Citizen’s Assembly. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dahan-Dalmedico, A. (2008). Climate Expertise: Between Scientific Credibility and Geopolitical Imperatives. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 33(1), 71–81.
Dahl, R. (1970). After the Revolution: Authority in a Good Society. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
Dahl, R. (1985). Controlling Nuclear Weapons: Democracy Versus Guardianship. Syracuse, NY: SUNY Press.
Dahl, R. (1989). Democracy and Its Critics. New Haven: Yale University Press.
de Vries, G. (2007). What Is Political in Sub-politics?: How Aristotle Might Help STS. Social Studies of Science, 37(5), 781–809.
Delannoi, G., and Dowlen, O.. (2010). Sortition: Theory and Practice. Exeter: Imprint Academic.
Dewey, J. (1927). The Public and Its Problems. Chicago: The Swallow Press.
Dewey, J. (1981a). Authority and Social Change. In Boydston, J. A., ed., John Dewey, The Later Works: 1925–1953, Vol. 11. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, pp. 130–145.
Dewey, J. (1981b). Creative Democracy – The Task Before Us. In Boydston, J. A., ed., John Dewey, The Later Works: 1925–1953, Vol. 14. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
Donner, W. (2007). John Stuart Mill on Education and Democracy. In Urbinati, N. and Zakaras, A., eds., J. S. Mill’s Political Thought: A Bicentennial Reassessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 250–274.
Douglas, H. E. (2009). Science, Policy, and the Value-Free Ideal. Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh University Press.
Dowlen, O. (2009). The Political Potential of Sortition: A Study of the Random Selection of Citizens for Public Office. Exeter: Imprint Academic.
Dryzek, J. S. (2000). Deliberative Democracy and Beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dryzek, J. S. (2010). Foundations and Frontiers of Deliberative Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dryzek, J. S., and Niemeyer, S., (2006). Reconciling Pluralism and Consensus as Political Ideals. American Journal of Political Science, 50, 634–649.
Durant, D. (2011) Models of Democracy in Social Studies of Science. Social Studies of Science, 41(5), 691–714.
Durant, J., Evans, G., and Thomas, P., (1989). The Public Understanding of Science. Nature, 340, 11–14.
Dzur, A. W. (2012). Four Theses on Participatory Democracy: Toward the Rational Disorganization of Government Institutions. Constellations, 19(2): 305–324.
Dzur, A. W., and Levin, D. L.. (2007). The Primacy of the Public: In Support of Bioethics Commissions as Deliberative Forums. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 17(2), 133–142.
Elster, J., ed. (1998). Deliberative Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Epstein, S. (1996). Impure Science: AIDS, Activism and the Politics of Knowledge. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
Estlund, D. (1993). Making Truth Safe for Democracy. In Copp, D., Hampton, J., and Roemer, J. E., eds., The Idea of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 71–100.
Estlund, D. (2008). Democratic Authority: A Philosophical Framework. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Evans, G., and Durant, J.. (1995). The Relationship between Knowledge and Attitudes in the Public Understanding of Science in Britain. Public Understanding of Science, 3, 57–74.
Ezrahi, Y. (1971). The Political Resources of American Science. Science Studies, 1, 117–133.
Ezrahi, Y. (1990). The Descent of Icarus: Science and the Transformation of Contemporary Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Felt, U., and Wynne, B.. (2007). Taking European Knowledge Society Seriously. Report of the Expert Group on Science and Governance to the Science, Economy and Society Directorate. Directorate General for Research, European Commission.
Ferejohn, J. (2008). Conclusion: The Citizens’ Assembly Model. In Warren, M. E. and Pearse, H., eds., Designing Deliberative Democracy: The British Columbia Citizen’s Assembly. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 192–213.
Fiorino, D. J. (1990). Citizen Participation and Environmental Risk: A Survey of Institutional Mechanisms. Science, Technology & Human Values, 15(2), 226–243.
Fischer, F. (2000). Citizens, Experts and the Environment: The Politics of Local Knowledge. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
Fischer, F. (2009). Democracy and Expertise: Reorienting Policy Inquiry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fishkin, J. S. (1997). The Voice of the People. Public Opinion and Democracy. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
Fishkin, J. S. (2009). When the People Speak: Deliberative Democracy and Public Consultation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fishkin, J. S., and Luskin, R. C.. (2005). Experimenting with a Democratic Ideal: Deliberative Polling and Public Opinion. Acta Politica, 40(3), 284–298.
Fishkin, J. S., He, B., Luskin, R. C., and Siu, A.. (2010). Deliberation in an Unlikely Place: Deliberative Polling in China. British Journal of Political Science, 40(2), 435–448.
Flathman, R. E. (1980). The Practice of Political Authority: Authority and the Authoritative. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
Fournier, P., van der Kolk, H., Carty, R. K., Blais, A., and Rose, J.. (2011). When Citizens Decide: Lessons from Citizens’ Assemblies on Electoral Reform. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fox Keller, E. (2011). What Are Climate Scientists to Do? Spontaneous Generations: A Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science, 5(1), 19–26.
Fraser, N. (1990). Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy. Social Text, 25/26, 56–80.
Freudenburg, W. R., and Muselli, V.. (2013). Reexamining Climate Change Debates: Scientific Disagreement or Scientific Certainty Argumentation Methods (SCAMs)? American Behavioural Scientist 57(6), 777–795.
Fricker, M. (1998). Rational Authority and Social Power: Towards a Truly Social Epistemology. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, New Series, 98, 159–177.
Friedman, R. B. (1990). On the Concept of Authority in Political Philosophy. In Raz, J., ed., Authority. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 56–91.
Friedrich, C. J. (1958). Authority, Reason and Discretion. In Friedrich, C. J., ed., Authority. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 27–48.
Fuerstein, M. (2014). Democratic Consensus as an Essential By-product. Journal of Political Philosophy, 22(3), 282–301.
Fuller, S. (1988). Social Epistemology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Fuller, S. (2000). The Governance of Science: Ideology and the Future of the Open Society. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Fung, A. (2003). Recipes for Public Spheres: Eight Institutional Choices and Their Consequences. Journal of Political Philosophy, 11: 338–367.
Fung, A., and Wright, E. O., eds. (2003). Deepening Democracy: Institutional Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance. London: Verso.
Gastil, J., Richards, R. C., and Knobloch, K. R. (2014). Vicarious Deliberation: How the Oregon Citizens’ Initiative Review Influenced Deliberation in Mass Elections. International Journal of Communication, 8, 62–89.
Gauchat, G. (2012). Politicization of Science in the Public Sphere: A Study of Public Trust in the United States, 1974 to 2010. American Sociological Review, 77(2), 167–187.
Geuss, R. (1981). The Idea of a Critical Theory: Habermas and the Frankfurt School. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gieryn, T. F. (1983). Boundary-Work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-science: Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists. American Sociological Review, 48(6), 781–795.
Gieryn, T. F. (1999). Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
Gilbert, M. (1987). Modelling Collective Belief. Synthese, 73(1), 185–204.
Gilbert, M. (1989). On Social Facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Gilbert, M. (1996). Modelling Collective Belief. In Living Together: Rationality, Sociality, and Obligation. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 195–214.
Gilbert, M. (2006). A Theory of Political Obligation: Membership, Commitment, and the Bonds of Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Goldman, A. I. (1999). Knowledge in a Social World. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Goldman, A. I. (2006). Experts: Which Ones Should You Trust? In Crease, R. P. and Selinger, E., eds., The Philosophy of Expertise. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 14–38.
Goodin, R. E. (2005). Sequencing Deliberative Moments. Acta Politica, 40, 182–196.
Goodin, R. E. (2006). Talking Politics: Perils and Promise. European Journal of Political Research, 45(2), 235–261.
Goodin, R. E. (2008). Innovating Democracy: Democratic Theory and Practice After the Deliberative Turn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Green, J. (2010). The Eyes of the People: Democracy in an Age of Spectatorship. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Greenberg, D. (2001). Science, Money, and Politics: Political Triumph and Ethical Erosion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Gunnarsson, L. (1994). Diskurs ohne Konsens. Deutsche Zeitschrift fur Philosophie, 42(2), 324–325.
Guston, D. H. (1999). Evaluating the First U.S. Consensus Conference: The Impact of the Citizen’s Panel on Telecommunications and the Future of Democracy. Science, Technology & Human Values, 24, 451–482.
Guston, D. H. (2001). Boundary Organizations in Environmental Policy and Science: An Introduction. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 26(4), 399–408.
Guston, D. H. (2005). On Consensus and Voting in Science: From Asilomar to the National Toxicology Program. In Frickel, S. and Moore, K., eds., The New Political Sociology of Science. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, pp. 378–404.
Gutmann, A., and Thompson, D.. (1996). Democracy and Disagreement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Gutmann, A., and Thompson, D.. (2004). Why Deliberative Democracy? Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Habermas, J. (1971a). Knowledge and Human Interests. Boston: Beacon Press.
Habermas, J. (1971b). Toward a Rational Society: Protest, Science, and Politics. Boston: Beacon Press.
Habermas, J. (1974). Theory and Practice. Trans. Viertel, John. London: Heinemann.
Habermas, J. (1981). The Theory of Communicative Action, Volume One: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Trans. McCarthy, Thomas. Boston: Beacon Press.
Habermas, J. (1994). Three Normative Models of Democracy. Constellations, 1(1), 1–10.
Habermas, J. (1996). Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Trans. Rehg, William. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Habermas, J. (1997). Popular Sovereignty as Procedure. In Bohman, J. and Rehg, W., eds., Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 35–66.
Hajer, M. (2009). Authoritative Governance: Policy Making in the Age of Mediatization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hajer, M. (2011). Inside the Science-Policy Interface: Reflections of a Deliberative Practitioner. Paper presented at workshop on Scientific Authority in Democratic Societies, Peter Wall Institute, University of British Columbia. 27–28 June.
Hajer, M., and Wagenaar, H. (2003). Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hansen, J. E. (2007). Scientific Reticence and Sea Level Rise. Environmental Research Letters, 2(2), 1–6.
Hansen, M. H. (1999). The Athenian Democracy in the Age of Demosthenes. University of Oklahoma Press.
Hansen, M. H. (2013). Reflections on Aristotle’s Politics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Hardwig, J. (1985). Epistemic Dependence. Journal of Philosophy, 82, 335–349.
Hardwig, J. (1994). Toward an Ethics of Expertise. In Wuste, D. E., ed., Professional Ethics and Social Responsibility. New York: Rowan and Littlefield.
Haskell, T. L. (1984). Introduction. In Haskell, T. L., ed., The Authority of Experts: Studies in History and Theory. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, pp. ix–xxxix.
Haskell, T. L. (1998). Objectivity Is Not Neutrality: Explanatory Schemes in History. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
He, B., and Warren, M. E.. (2011). Authoritarian Deliberation: The Deliberative Turn in Chinese Political Development. Perspectives on Politics, 9(2), 269–289.
Hermet, G. (2007). L’hiver de la Démocratie ou le Nouveau Régime. Paris: Armand Colin.
Hibbing, J. R., and Theiss-Morse, E.. (2002). Stealth Democracy: Americans’ Beliefs about How Government Should Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hilgartner, S. (1990) The Dominant View of Popularization: Conceptual Problems, Political Uses. Social Studies of Science, 20(3), 519–539.
Hobbes, T. (1968 [1651]). Leviathan. Harmondsworth: Pelican Books.
Hoggan, J. (2009). Climate Cover-Up: The Crusade to Deny Global Warming. Vancouver/Toronto/Berkeley: Greystone Books.
Hong, L., and Page, S. E.. (2001). Problem Solving by Heterogeneous Agents. Journal of Economic Theory, 97(1), 123–163.
Hong, L., and Page, S. E.. (2004). Groups of Diverse Problem Solvers Can Outperform Groups of High-Ability Problem Solvers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States, 101(46), 16385–16389.
Hulme, M. (2009). Why We Disagree about Climate Change: Understanding Controversy, Inaction and Opportunity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hulme, M. (2013). Does Science Need to Be Consensual to Be Authoritative?
Hulme, M., and Mahony, M.. (2010). Climate Change: What Do We Know about the IPCC? Progress in Physical Geography, 34(5), 705–718.
Inhofe, J. (2012). The Greatest Hoax: How the Global Warming Conspiracy Threatens Your Future. Washington, DC: WND Books.
Janis, I. L. (1982 [1972]). Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascoes. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Jasanoff, S. (1990). The Fifth Branch: Scientific Advisors as Policy Makers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Jasanoff, S. (2003). Technologies of Humility: Citizen Participation in Governing Science. Minerva, 41, 223–244.
Jasanoff, S. (2005a). Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Jasanoff, S. (2005b). ‘Let them eat cake’: GM Foods and the Democratic Imagination. In Leach, M., Scoones, I., and Wynne, B. eds., Science and Citizenship: Globalization and the Challenge of Engagement. London and New York: Zed Books, pp. 183–198.
Kadlec, A., and Friedman, W.. (2007). Deliberative Democracy and the Problem of Power. Journal of Public Deliberation, 3(2), Article 8: 1–26.
Kahan, D., Wittlin, M., Peters, E., Slovic, P., Ouellette, L., Braman, D., and Mandel, G. N.. (2011). The Tragedy of the Risk-Perception Commons: Culture Conflict, Rationality Conflict, and Climate Change. Yale Law School, Public Law Working Paper No. 230.
Kantrowitz, A. (1967). Proposal for an Institution for Scientific Judgment. Science, 156, 763–764.
Kantrowitz, A. (1976). The Science Court Experiment: An Interim Report. Science, 193, 653–656.
Kappel, K. (2008). Liberal Democracy and Epistemic Neutrality. Paper presented at the conference Epistemological Conceptions of the Open Society, University of Edinburgh, 8 April.
Karinen, R., and Guston, D. H.. (2009). Toward Anticipatory Governance: The Experience with Nanotechnology. In Kaiser, M., Kurath, M., Maasen, S., and Rehmann-Sutter, C., eds., Governing Future Technologies: Nanotechnology and the Rise of an Assessment Regime. Berlin: Springer, pp. 217–232.
Keane, J. (2009). The Life and Death of Democracy. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Kerr, R. A. (2007). Pushing the Scary Side of Global Warming. Nature, 316, 1412–1415.
King, A., and Crewe, I.. (2013). The Blunders of Our Governments. London: Oneworld Publications.
Kitcher, P. (2001). Science, Truth and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kitcher, P. (2011). Science in a Democratic Society. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Press.
Kleinman, D. L., Delborne, J. A., and Anderson, A. A.. (2011). Engaging Citizens: The High Cost of Citizen Participation in High Technology. Public Understanding of Science, 20(2), 221–240.
Knight, J., and Johnson, J.. (1997). What Sort of Equality Does Deliberative Democracy Require? In Bohman, J. and Rehg, W., eds., Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 279–320.
Knight, J., and Johnson, J.. (2011). The Priority of Democracy: Political Consequences of Pragmatism. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Knobloch, K., Gastil, J., Reedy, J., and Walsh, K. Cramer. (2013). Did They Deliberate? Applying an Evaluative Model of Democratic Deliberation to the Oregon Citizens’ Initiative Review. Journal of Applied Communications Research, 41(2), 105–125.
Kuklinski, J. H., Quirk, P. J., Jerit, J., Schwieder, D., and Rich, R. F.. (2000). Misinformation and the Currency of Democratic Citizenship. Journal of Politics, 62(3), 790–816.
Kuran, T. (1997). Private Truths, Public Lies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Lafont, C. (2015). Deliberation, Participation, and Democratic Legitimacy: Should Deliberative Mini-publics Shape Public Policy? Journal of Political Philosophy, 32(1), 40–63.
Lahsen, M. (1999). The Detection and Attribution of Conspiracies: The Controversy over Chapter 8. In Marcus, G. E., ed., Paranoia Within Reason: A Casebook on Conspiracy as Explanation. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 111–136.
Landemore, H. (2013). Democratic Reason: Politics, Collective Intelligence, and the Rule of the Many. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Lane, M. (2011). When the Experts Are Uncertain: Scientific Knowledge and the Ethics of Democratic Judgment. Paper presented at the Edmond J. Safra Center for Ethics, Harvard University, 1 December.
Lang, A. (2008). Agenda-Setting in Deliberative Forums: Expert Influence and Citizen Autonomy in the British Columbia Citizens’ Assembly. In Warren, M. E. and Pearse, H., eds., Designing Deliberative Democracy: The British Columbia Citizen’s Assembly. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 85–105.
Laski, H. (1931). The Limitations of the Experts. Fabian tract 235. London: The Fabian Society.
Latour, B. (1991). The Impact of Science Studies on Political Philosophy. Science, Technology & Human Values, 16(1), 3–19.
Latour, B. (2003). What If We Talked Politics a Little? Contemporary Political Theory, 2(2), 143–164.
Latour, B. (2004a). The Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Latour, B. (2004b). Why Has Critique Run Out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern. Critical Inquiry, 30(2), 225–248.
Latour, B. (2007). Turning Around Politics: A Note on Gerard de Vries’s Paper. Social Studies of Science, 37(5), 811–820.
Leib, E. J. (2004). Deliberative Democracy in America: A Proposal for a Popular Branch of Government. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E., Roser-Renouf, C., and Hmielowski, J. D.. (2011). Politics and Global Warming: Democrats, Republicans, Independents, and the Tea Party. Yale University and George Mason University. New Haven, CT: Yale Project on Climate Change Communication. http://environment.yale.edu/climate/files/PoliticsGlobalWarming2011.pdf. Lewandowsky, S., Oberauer, K., and Gignac, G.. (2013a). Nasa Faked the Moon Landing–Therefore (Climate) Science Is a Hoax: An Anatomy of the Motivated Rejection of Science. Psychological Science, 5, 622–633.
Lewandowsky, S., Mann, M. E., Bauld, L., Hastings, G., and Loftus, E. F.. (2013b). The Subterranean War on Science. Observer, 26(9), November.
Lewandowsky, S., Cook, J., Oberauer, K., Brophy, S., Lloyd, E. A., and Marriott, M.. (2015). Recurrent Fury: Conspiratorial Discourse in the Blogosphere Triggered by Research on the Role of Conspiracist Ideation in Climate Denial. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 3(1), 142–178.
Lezaun, J., and Soneryd, S.. (2007). Consulting Citizens: Technologies of Elicitation and the Mobility of Publics. Public Understanding of Science, 16(3), 279–297.
Longino, H. (2002). The Fate of Knowledge. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Lovbrand, E., Pielke, R., and Beck, S.. (2011). A Democracy Paradox in Studies of Science and Technology. Science, Technology & Human Values, 36, 474–496.
Lukes, S. (1990). Perspectives on Authority. In Raz, J., ed., Authority. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp. 203–218.
Lyotard, J.-F. (1988). The Differend: Phrases in Dispute. Trans. Van Den Abbeele, Georges. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Macalister, T., and Carter, H.. (2009). Britain’s Farmers Still Restricted by Chernobyl Nuclear Fallout. The Guardian, 12 May.
Macdonald, M. (1956). Natural Rights. In Laslett, P. and Runciman, W. G., eds., Philosophy, Politics and Society. Oxford: Blackwell.
MacKenzie, M. K., and Moore, A.. (2016). Good Ways of Being Passive. Paper presented at workshop on the Ethics of Political Participation, University of Loughborough, 21 June.
MacKenzie, M. K., and O’Doherty, K. (2011). Deliberating Future Issues: Minipublics and Salmon Genomics. Journal of Public Deliberation, 7(1).
MacKenzie, M. K., and Warren, M. E.. (2012). Two Trust-Based Uses of Minipublics in Democratic Systems. In Parkinson, J. and Mansbridge, J., eds., Deliberative Systems: Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 95–124.
Mackie, G. (2006) Does Deliberation Change Minds? Politics, Philosophy & Economics 5(3), 279–303.
MacLean, S., and Burgess, M. M. (2009). In the Public Interest: Assessing Expert and Stakeholder Influence in Public Deliberation about Biobanks. Public Understanding of Science, 19(4), 486–496.
Mair, P. (2013). Ruling the Void: The Hollowing of Western Democracy. London and New York: Verso.
Manin, B. (1987). On Legitimacy and Political Deliberation. Political Theory, 15(3), 338–368.
Manin, B. (1997). The Principles of Representative Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Manin, B. (2005). Democratic Deliberation: Why We Should Promote Debate Rather Than Discussion. Paper delivered at the Program in Ethics and Public Affairs Seminar, Princeton University, 13 October.
Mann, M. E. (2012). The Hockey Stick and the Climate Wars: Dispatches from the Front Lines. New York: Columbia University Press.
Mansbridge, J. (1996). Using Power/Fighting Power. In Benhabib, S., ed., Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 46–66.
Mansbridge, J., Bohman, J., Chambers, S., Estlund, D., Follesdal, A., Fung, A., Lafont, C., Manin, B., and Marti, J. L.. (2010). The Place of Self-Interest and the Role of Power in Deliberative Democracy. Journal of Political Philosophy, 18(1), 64–100.
Mansbridge, J., Bohman, J., Chambers, S., Christiano, T., Fung, A., Parkinson, J., Thompson, D., and Warren, M. E.. (2012). A Systemic Approach to Deliberative Democracy. In Parkinson, J. and Mansbridge, J., eds., Deliberative Systems: Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–26.
Markell, P. (1997) Contesting Consensus: Re-reading Habermas on the Public Sphere. Constellations, 3(3), 377–400.
Markowitz, G., and Rosner, D.. (2002). Deceit and Denial: The Deadly Politics of Industrial Pollution. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Marres, N. (2007). The Issues Deserve More Credit: Pragmatist Contributions to the Study of Public Involvement in Controversy. Social Studies of Science, 37(5), 759–780.
McCormick, J. P. (2011). Machiavellian Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McGarity, T. O., and Wagner, W.. (2008). Bending Science: How Special Interests Corrupt Public Health Research. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
McKee, M., and Diethelm, P.. (2010). How the Growth of Denialism Undermines Public Health. BMJ, 341, c6950.
McKitrick, R., and Michaels, P. J.. (2004). A Test of Corrections for Extraneous Signals in Gridded Surface Temperature Data. Climate Research, 26(2), 159–173.
Mercier, H., and Sperber, D.. (2011). Why Do Humans Reason? Arguments for an Argumentative Theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34, 57–111.
Michaels, D. (2008). Doubt Is Their Product: How Industry’s Assault on Science Threatens Your Health. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mill, J. S. (1974 [1843]). A System of Logic Ratiocinative and Inductive. In Robson, J. M., ed., The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Volume VIII: A System of Logic Ratiocinative and Inductive Part II. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Mill, J. S. (1977a [1861]). Considerations on Representative Government. In Robson, J. M., ed., The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Volume XIX: Essays on Politics and Society Part 2. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, pp. 371–577.
Mill, J. S. (1977b [1859]). On Liberty. In Robson, J. M., ed., The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Volume XVIII: Essays on Politics and Society Part I. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, pp. 213–310.
Mill, J. S. (1986 [1831]). The Spirit of the Age. In Robson, A. and Robson, J. M., eds., The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Volume XXII: Newspaper Writings December 1822–July 1831 Part I. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, pp. 227–234, 238–245, 252–257, 289–294, 304–306.
Miller, J. D. (1983). Scientific Literacy: A Conceptual and Empirical Review. Daedalus, 112(2), 29–48.
Miller, J. D. (2004). Public Understanding of, and Attitudes Toward, Scientific Research: What We Know and What We Need to Know. Public Understanding of Science, 13(3), 273–294.
Montford, A. W. (2010). The Hockey Stick Illusion: Climategate and the Corruption of Science. London: Stacey International.
Moore, A. (2010a). Beyond Participation: Opening Up Political Theory in STS. Social Studies of Science, 40(5), 793–799.
Moore, A. (2010b). Public Bioethics and Deliberative Democracy. Political Studies, 58(4), 715–730.
Moore, A. (2012). Following from the Front: Theorizing Deliberative Facilitation. Critical Policy Studies, 6(2), 146–162.
Moore, A. (2014a). Deference in Numbers: Consensus, Dissent and Judgement in Mill’s Account of Authority. Political Studies, 62(S1), 187–201.
Moore, A. (2014b). Democratic Reason, Democratic Faith, and the Problem of Expertise. Critical Review, 26(1–2), 101–114.
Moore, A., and Stilgoe, J. (2009). Experts and Anecdotes the Role of ‘Anecdotal Evidence’ in Public Scientific Controversies. Science, Technology & Human Values, 34(5), 654–677.
Mouffe, C. (1996). Democracy, Power and the Political. In Benhabib, S., ed., Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 245–256.
Muirhead, R. (2014). The Politics of Getting It Right. Critical Review, 26(1–2), pp. 115–128.
Mukherjee, S. (2010). The Emperor of All Maladies: A Biography of Cancer. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Norris, P. (2002). Democratic Phoenix: Reinventing Political Activism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nyhan, B., and Reifler, J.. (2010). When Corrections Fail: The Persistence of Political Misperceptions. Political Behavior, 32(2), 303–330.
Ober, J. (2008). Democracy and Knowledge: Innovation and Learning in Classical Athens. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
O’Doherty, K. C., and Burgess, M. M.. (2008). Engaging the Public on Biobanks: Outcomes of the BC Biobank Deliberation. Public Health Genomics, 12(4), 203–215.
Offe, C., and Preuss, U. K.. (1991). Democratic Institutions and Moral Resources. In Held, D., ed., Political Theory Today. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 143–171.
O’Leary, K. (2006). Saving Democracy: A Plan for Real Representation in America. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Oreskes, N. (2004a). Science and Public Policy: What’s Proof Got to Do with It? Environmental Science & Policy, 7(5), 369–383.
Oreskes, N. (2004b). Beyond the Ivory Tower: The Scientific Consensus on Climate Change. Science, 306(5702), 1686.
Oreskes, N., and Conway, E. M.. (2010). Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming. New York: Bloomsbury Press.
Owens, S. (2011). Three Thoughts on the Third Wave. Critical Policy Studies, 5(3), 329–333.
Papadopolous, Y. (2012). On the Embeddedness of Deliberation: Why Elite Innovations Matter More. In Parkinson, J. and Mansbridge, J., eds., Deliberative Systems: Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 125–150.
Pareek, M., and Pattison, H. M.. (2000). The Two-Dose Measles, Mumps, and Rubella (MMR) Immunisation Schedule: Factors Affecting Maternal Intention to Vaccinate. British Journal of General Practice, 50(461), 969–971.
Parkinson, J. (2006a). Deliberating in the Real World: Problems of Legitimacy in Deliberative Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Parkinson, J. (2006b). Rickety Bridges: Using the Media in Deliberative Democracy. British Journal of Political Science, 36(1), 175–183.
Parkinson, J. (2012). Democratizing Deliberative Systems. In Parkinson, J. and Mansbridge, J., eds., Deliberative Systems: Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 151–172.
Parkinson, J., and Mansbridge, J., eds. (2012). Deliberative Systems: Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pateman, C. (1970). Participation and Democratic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Peirce, C. S. (1935). Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Volumes V and VI: Pragmatism and Pragmaticism and Scientific Metaphysics. Hartshorne, C., and Weis, P., eds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Peters, R. S. (1967). Authority. In Quinton, A., ed., Political Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 82–96.
Pettit, P. (1997). Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pettit, P. (2000). Democracy: Electoral and Contestatory. In Shapiro, I. and Macedo, S., eds., Nomos XLII: Designing Democratic Institutions. New York: New York University Press.
Pettit, P. (2004). Depoliticizing Democracy. Ratio Juris, 17(1), 52–65.
Pettit, P. (2012). On the People's Terms: A Republican Theory and Model of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pielke, R. A. (2004). When Scientists Politicize Science: Making Sense of Controversy Over the Skeptical Environmentalist. Environmental Science & Policy, 7, 405–417.
Pielke, R. A. (2007). The Honest Broker: Making Sense of Science in Policy and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pierson, R. (1994). The Epistemic Authority of Expertise. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, 1, 398–405.
Plato, (1995). The Statesman. Trans. Waterfield, R. and ed. Annas, J. and Waterfield, R.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Plato, (2000). The Republic. Trans. Griffith, T. and ed. Ferrari, G.R.F.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Plato, (2010). Protagorus. Trans. Jowett, B.. London: Aeterna Publishing.
Polanyi, M. (1962). The Republic of Science: Its Political and Economic Theory. Minerva, 1, 54–74.
Poortinga, W, and Pidgeon, N. F.. (2003). Exploring the Dimensionality of Trust in Risk Regulation. Risk Analysis, 23, 961–972.
Pornpitakpan, C. (2004). The Persuasiveness of Source Credibility: A Critical Review of Five Decades’ Evidence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(2), 243–281.
Posner, R. A. (2009). Law, Pragmatism, and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Prior, L. (2003) Belief, Knowledge and Expertise: The Emergence of the Lay Expert in Medical Sociology. Sociology of Health and Illness, 25(3), 41–57.
Przeworski, A. (1998). Deliberation and Ideological Domination. In Elster, J., ed., Deliberative Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 140–160.
Przeworski, A. (1999). Minimalist Conception of Democracy: A Defense. In Shapiro, I. and Hacker-Cordón, C., eds., Democracy’s Value. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 23–55.
Putnam, H. (1992). A Reconsideration of Deweyan Democracy. In Putnam, H., Renewing Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Ranalli, B. (2012). Climate Science, Character, and the Hard Won Consensus. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 22(2), 183–210.
Rawls, J. 1999 [1971]. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: The Belnap Press of Harvard University Press.
Raz, J. (1990). Authority and Justification. In Raz, J., ed., Authority. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 115–141.
Raz, J. (2006). The Problem of Authority: Revisiting the Service Conception. Minnesota Law Review, 90, 1003–1044.
Renn, O., Webler, T. and Weidemann, P., eds. (1995). Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation: Evaluating Models for Environmental Discourse. Dordrecht, NL: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Rescher, N. (1993). Pluralism: Against the Demand for Consensus. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Richardson, H. (2002). Democratic Autonomy: Public Reasoning about the Ends of Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Richardson, H. (2012). Relying on Experts as We Reason Together. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 22(2), 91–110.
Riley, J. (2007). Mill’s Neo-Athenian Model of Liberal Democracy. In Urbinati, N. and Zakaras, A., eds., J. S. Mill’s Political Thought: A Bicentennial Reassessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 221–247.
Rosanvallon, P. (2008). Counter-Democracy: Politics in an Age of Distrust. Trans. Goldhammer, A.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rosanvallon, P. (2011). Democratic Legitimacy: Impartiality, Reflexivity, Objectivity. Trans. Goldhammer, A.. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Rose, N. (1999). Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rosenblum, N. (1987). Studying Authority: Keeping Pluralism in Mind. In Pennock, J. R. and Chapman, J. W., eds., Authority Revisited. New York and London: New York University Press, pp. 102–130.
Rosenblum, N. (2008). On the Side of the Angels. An Appreciation of Parties and Partisanship. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Rousseau, J.-J. (1987). The Basic Political Writings. Trans. Cress, D. A.. Indianapolis and Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company.
Rowe, G., and Frewer, L. J. (2000). Public Participation Methods: A Framework for Evaluation. Science, Technology & Human Values 25(1), 3–29.
Rummens, S. (2012). Staging Deliberation: The Role of Representative Institutions in the Deliberative Democratic Process. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 20(1), 23–44.
Ryan, A. (1998). Mill in a Liberal Landscape. In Skorupski, J., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Mill. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 497–540.
Ryan, A. (2007). Bureaucracy, Democracy, Liberty: Some Unanswered Questions in Mill’s Politics. In Urbinati, N. and Zakaras, A., eds., J. S. Mill’s Political Thought: A Bicentennial Reassessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 147–156.
Sanders, L. M. (1997). Against Deliberation. Political Theory, 25(3), 347–376.
Sarewitz, D. (2010). Curing Climate Backlash. Nature, 464, 4 March, 28.
Saward, M. (2010). The Representative Claim. Oxford University Press.
Schattschneider, E. E. (2004 [1942]). Party Government. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Schudson, M. (1998). The Good Citizen: A History of Civic Life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Schudson, M. (2006). The Trouble with Experts – and Why Democracies Need Them. Theory and Society, 35(5/6), 491–506.
Schudson, M. (2015). The Rise of the Right to Know: Politics and the Culture of Transparency. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Schumpeter, J. A. (2003 [1943]). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. London and New York: Routledge.
Sclove, R. E. (1995). Democracy and Technology. New York and London: Guilford Press.
Shapiro, I. (1994). Three Ways to Be a Democrat. Political Theory, 22(1), 124–151.
Skorupski, J. (2006). Why Read Mill Today? London: Routledge.
Smith, G. (2009). Democratic Innovations: Designing Institutions for Citizen Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Solomon, M. (2001). Social Empiricism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Solomon, M. (2006). Groupthink Versus the Wisdom of Crowds: The Social Epistemology of Deliberation and Dissent. The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 44(S1), 28–42.
Solomon, M. (2007). The Social Epistemology of NIH Consensus Conferences. In Kincaid, H. and McKitrick, J., eds., Establishing Medical Reality. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 167–177.
Solomon, S. (2009). Stakeholders or Experts? On the Ambiguous Implications of Public Participation in Science. In van Bouwel, J., ed., The Social Sciences and Democracy. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 39–61.
Specter, M. G. (2010). Habermas: An Intellectual Biography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Specter, M. (2009). Denialism: How Irrational Thinking Prevents Scientific Progress, Harms the Planet and Threatens Our Lives. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Steiner, J., and Dorff, R. H.. (1980). Decision by Interpretation: A New Concept for an Often Overlooked Decision Mode. British Journal of Political Science, 10, 1–13.
Steiner, J., Bächtiger, A., Spörndli, M., and Steenbergen, M.. (2004). Deliberative Politics in Action: Analysing Parliamentary Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stevens, T. M. L. (2000). Bioethics in America: Origins and Cultural Politics. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Stone, P. (2011). The Luck of the Draw: The Role of Lotteries in Decision Making. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sunstein, C. R. (1999). Agreement Without Theory. In Macedo, S., ed., Deliberative Politics: Essays on Democracy and Disagreement. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 123–150.
Sunstein, C. R. (2009). Going to Extremes: How Like Minds Unite and Divide. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Surowiecki, J. (2004). The Wisdom of Crowds: Why the Many Are Smarter Than the Few. London: Abacus.
Tesh, S. N. (2000). Uncertain Hazards: Environmental Activists and Scientific Proof. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Thagard, P. (1997). Collaborative Knowledge. Noûs, 31, 242–261.
Thompson, D. F. (1976). John Stuart Mill and Representative Government. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Thompson, D. F. (1999). Democratic Secrecy. Political Science Quarterly, 114(2), 181–193.
Thompson, D. F. (2008). Deliberative Democratic Theory and Empirical Political Science. Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 497–520.
Thorpe, C. (2007). Political Theory and Science and Technology Studies. In Wajcman, J., Lynch, M., Amsterdamska, O., and Hackett, E. J., eds., The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, Third Edition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 63–82.
Tocqueville, A. de (1990 [1840]). Democracy in America. (Vol. 2). New York: Vintage.
Tucker, A. (2008). Pre-emptive Democracy: Oligarchic Tendencies in Deliberative Democracy. Political Studies, 56(1), 127–147.
Turner, S. P. (2003). Liberal Democracy 3.0. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: SAGE Publications.
Turner, S. P. (2011). Double Heuristics. Paper presented at workshop on Scientific Authority in Democratic Societies, Peter Wall Institute, University of British Columbia, 27–28 June.
Urbinati, N. (2002). Mill on Democracy: From the Athenian Polis to Representative Government. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Urbinati, N. (2006). Representative Democracy: Principles and Genealogy. Chicago,: University of Chicago Press.
Urbinati, N. (2007). The Many Heads of the Hydra: J. S. Mill on Despotism. In Urbinati, N. and Zakaras, A., eds., J. S. Mill’s Political Thought: A Bicentennial Reassessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 66–97.
Urbinati, N. (2010). Unpolitical Democracy. Political Theory, 38(1), 65–92.
Urbinati, N. (2014). Democracy Disfigured: Opinion, Truth, and the People. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Urbinati, N., and Warren, M. E.. (2008). The Concept of Representation in Contemporary Democratic Theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 387–412.
Urfalino, P. (2006). Apparent Consensus and Voting: Two Modes of Collective Decision-Making. Presented at the workshop The Mechanisms of Collective Decision-Making, Adriano Olivetti Foundation, Rome, April 29. Available at http://cespra.ehess.fr/docannexe.php?id=551. Urfalino, P. (2007). La décision par consensus apparent: nature et propriétés. Revue Européenne des Sciences Sociales, 45, 47–70.
Urfalino, P. (2012). Reasons and Preferences in Medicine Evaluation Committees. In Landemore, H. and Elster, J., eds., Collective Wisdom: Principles and Mechanisms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 173–202.
Vibert, F. (2007). The Rise of the Unelected: Democracy and the New Separation of Powers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Waldron, J. (1995). The Wisdom of the Multitude: Some Reflections on Book 3, Chapter 11 of Aristotle’s Politics. Political Theory, 23(4), 563–584.
Warren, M. E. (1996a). Deliberative Democracy and Authority. The American Political Science Review, 90(1), 46–60.
Warren, M. E. (1996b). What Should We Expect from More Democracy?: Radically Democratic Responses to Politics. Political Theory, 24(2), 241–270.
Warren, M. E. (1999). What Is Political? Journal of Theoretical Politics, 11(2), 207–231.
Warren, M. E. (2001). Democracy and Association. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Warren, M. E. (2003). A Second Transformation of Democracy? In Cain, B. E., Dalton, R., and Scarrow, S., eds., Democracy Transformed? Expanding Political Opportunities in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 223–249.
Warren, M. E. (2009). Governance-Driven Democratization. Critical Policy Studies, 3(1), 3–13.
Warren, M. E. (2012). When, Where and Why Do We Need Deliberation, Voting and Other Means of Organizing Democracy? Paper presented at the Midwest Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Chicago, 12–15 April.
Warren, M. E., and Pearse, H., eds. (2008). Designing Deliberative Democracy: The British Columbia Citizen’s Assembly. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Weber, M. (1968). Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Ed. Roth, G. and Wittich, C.. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press.
Weber, M., (1991). Politics as a Vocation. In Gerth, H. H. and Wright Mills, C., eds., From Max Weber. London: Routledge, pp. 77–128.
Weingart, P. (1999). Scientific Expertise and Political Accountability: Paradoxes of Science in Politics. Science and Public Policy, 26(3), 151–161.
Westbrook, R. B. (1998). Pragmatism and Democracy: Reconstructing the Logic of John Dewey’s Faith. In Dickstein, Morris, ed., The Revival of Pragmatism: New Essays on Social Thought, Law, and Culture. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 128–140.
White, J., and Ypi, L.. (2011). On Partisan Political Justification. American Political Science Review 105(2), 381–396.
Wildavsky, A. (1997). But Is It True?: A Citizen’s Guide to Environmental Health and Safety Issues. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Winch, P. (1967). Authority. In Quinton, A., ed., Political Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 97–111.
Winner, L. (1986). The Whale and the Reactor: A Search for Limits in an Age of High Technology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Wolff, R. P. (1970). In Defense of Anarchism. New York: Harper and Row.
Wolin, S. (1994). Norm and Form: The Constitutionalizing of Democracy. In Euben, J. P., Wallach, J. R., and Ober, J., eds., Athenian Political Thought and the Reconstruction of American Democracy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, pp. 29–58.
Wolin, S. (2004). Politics and Vision: Continuity and Innovation in Western Political Thought, Expanded Edition. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Wollheim, R. (1962). A Paradox in the Theory of Democracy. In Laslett, P. and Runciman, W. G., eds., Philosophy, Politics and Society (Second Series). Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp. 71–87.
Wynne, B. (1989). Sheepfarming After Chernobyl: A Case Study in Communicating Scientific Information. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 31(2), 10–39.
Wynne, B. (1996). May the Sheep Safely Graze? A Reflexive View of the Expert-Lay Knowledge Divide. In Wynne, B., Szerszynski, B., and Lash, S., eds., Risk, Environment, and Modernity: Towards a New Ecology. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: SAGE Publications.
Yearley, S. (1995). The Environmental Challenge to Science Studies. In Jasanoff, S., Markle, G., Peterson, J. C., and Pinch, T., eds., Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: SAGE Publications, pp. 457–479.
Young, I. M. (1996). Communication and the Other: Beyond Deliberative Democracy. In Benhabib, S., ed., Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 120–135.
