Book contents
- Contesting Sovereignty
- Contesting Sovereignty
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Part I Normative Contestation in Regional Organisations
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Theoretical Framework
- Part II The African Union
- Part III The Association of Southeast Asian Nations
- Part IV Comparative Findings
- Appendix List of Officials Interviewed
- Bibliography
- Index
2 - Theoretical Framework
from Part I - Normative Contestation in Regional Organisations
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 June 2021
- Contesting Sovereignty
- Contesting Sovereignty
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Part I Normative Contestation in Regional Organisations
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Theoretical Framework
- Part II The African Union
- Part III The Association of Southeast Asian Nations
- Part IV Comparative Findings
- Appendix List of Officials Interviewed
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
The utility of a norm is central to its adoption and this utility is generative of a norm’s adherents: the ‘norm circle’. Regional organisations provide excellent arenas to witness normative contestation between norm circles, as well as to understand how a ‘successful’ norm is selected. Within a regional organisation, specific domain rules apply, and these provide the criteria for the successful passage of a normative proposal. The three broad criteria suggested are the control of the initiative, the mastery of existing shared norms, and ‘metis’, the ability to identify opportunities for influence and expand the norm circle. The chapter ends with a review of suitable cases in the OAU/AU and ASEAN.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Contesting SovereigntyPower and Practice in Africa and Southeast Asia, pp. 30 - 70Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021