Aalders, G. J. D. (1975) Political Thought in Hellenistic Times. Amsterdam.
Algra, K., J. Barnes, J. Mansfeld, and M. Schofield (eds.) (1999) The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy. Cambridge.
Altman, W. H. F. (2009) “Womanly humanism in Cicero’s Tusculan Disputations,”TAPA 139: 411–45.
Ando, C. (2006) “Religion and ius publicum,” in Religion and Law in Classical and Christian Rome, ed. C. Ando and J. Rüpke. Stuttgart: 126–45.
Ando, C. (2008) The Matter of the Gods: Religion and the Roman Empire. Berkeley, Calif.
Annas, J. (1997) “Politics and ethics in Plato’s Republic (book v 449a–471c),” in Platon: Politeia, ed. O. Höffe. Berlin: 141–60.
Annas, J. (2013) “Plato’s Laws and Cicero’s de Legibus,” in Aristotle, Plato and Pythagoreanism in the First Century bc: New Directions for Philosophy, ed. M. Schofield. Cambridge:206–24.
Arendt, H. (1976) The Origins of Totalitarianism. New York.
Arendt, H. (1978) The Life of the Mind: Thinking and Willing. One-volume edn. New York.
Arendt, H. (2006) On Revolution. New York.
Arkes, H. (1992) “That ‘nature herself has placed in our ears a power of judging’: some reflections on the ‘naturalism’ of Cicero,” in George (1992), 245–77.
Arnaud, A.-J. (1973) Essai d’analyse structurale du code civil français. Paris.
Asmis, E. (2004) “The state as a partnership: Cicero’s definition of res publica in his work On the State,”History of Political Thought 25.4: 569–99.
Asmis, E. (2005) “A new kind of model: Cicero’s Roman constitution in De Republica,”AJPh 126.3: 377–416.
Asmis, E. (2008) “Cicero on natural law and the laws of the state,”ClAnt 27.1: 1–33.
Atkins, E. M. (1990) “Domina et regina virtutum: justice and societas in De Officiis,”Phronesis 35: 258–89.
Atkins, E. M. (2000) “Cicero,” in Rowe and Schofield (2000), 477–516.
Atkins, J. W. (2011) “L’argument du De Re publica et le Songe de Scipion.”Eph 99.4: 455–69.
Atkins, J. W. (2013) “Cicero on the relationship between Plato’s Republic and Laws,” in Ancient Approaches to Plato’s Republic, ed. Anne Sheppard. BICS Supplement 117. London: 15–34.
Bakhtin, M. M. (1984) Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics, ed. and trans. C. Emerson. Minneapolis, Minn.
Bakhtin, M. M. (1986) Speech Genres and Other Late Essays, eds. C. Emerson and M. Holquist, trans. V. W. McGee. Austin, Tex.
Baraz, Y. (2012) A Written Republic: Cicero’s Philosophical Politics. Princeton, N.J.
Barlow, J. J. (1987) “The education of statesmen in Cicero’s ‘De Republica’,”Polity 19.3: 353–74.
Barnes, J. (1989) “Antiochus of Ascalon,” in Philosophia Togata: Essays on Philosophy and Roman Society, ed. M. Griffin and J. Barnes. Oxford: 51–96.
Beard, M. (1986) “Cicero and divinization: the formation of a Latin discourse,”JRS 76: 33–46.
Benardete, S. (1987) “Cicero’s De Legibusi: its plan and intention,”AJPh 108.2: 295–309.
Berger, A. (1991) Encyclopedic Dictionary of Roman Law. Philadelphia, Penn.
Bloom, A. (1968) “Interpretive essay,” in The Republic of Plato, ed. and trans. A. Bloom. New York:307–472.
Blössner, N. (2001) Cicero gegen die Philosophie: Eine Analyse von De re publica 1.1–3. Nachrichten der Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, Philologisch-Historische Klasse, no. 3. Göttingen.
Bobonich, C. (1996) “Reading the Laws,” in Form and Argument in Late Plato, eds. C. Gill and M. M. McCabe. Oxford: 249–82.
Bobonich, C. (2002). Plato’s Utopia Recast: His Later Ethics and Politics. Oxford.
Borkowski, A. (1994) Textbook on Roman Law. London.
Botwinick, A. (2011) Michael Oakeshott’s Skepticism. Princeton, N.J.
Boyancé, P. (1936) Études sur le Songe de Scipion. Paris.
Boyancé, P. (1970) Études sur l’humanisme cicéronien. Collection Latomus 121. Brussels.
Bréguet, E. (ed.) (1980) Cicéron: La République (2 vols.). Paris.
Brett, A. (2003) “The development of the idea of citizens’ rights,” in States and Citizens: History, Theory, Prospects, eds. Q. Skinner and B. Stråth. Cambridge: 97–112.
Brittain, C. (2001) Philo of Larissa: The Last of the Academic Sceptics. Oxford.
Brouwer, R. (2011) “Polybius and Stoic Tyche,”GRBS 51: 111–32.
Brunt, P. A. (1988) “Libertas,” in The Fall of the Roman Republic and Related Essays. Oxford: 281–350.
Brunt, P. A. (1993) “The model city of Plato’s Laws,” in Studies in Greek History and Thought. Oxford: 245–81.
Büchner, K. (1962) “Der Tyrann und sein Gegenbild in Ciceros ‘Staat’,” in Studien zur römischen Literatur Bild 2: Cicero. Wiesbaden: 116–47.
Büchner, K. (1984) M. Tullius Cicero. De Re Publica. Heidelberg.
Burnyeat, M. F. (ed.) (1983) The Skeptical Tradition. Berkeley, Calif.
Caspar, T. W. (2011) Recovering the Ancient View of Founding: A Commentary on Cicero’s De Legibus. Lanham, Md.
Ceaser, J. W. (2006) Nature and History in American Political Development. Cambridge, Mass.
Clay, D. (1988) “Reading the Republic,” in Griswold (1988), 19–33.
Clay, D. (2000) Platonic Questions: Dialogues with the Silent Philosopher. University Park, Penn.
Cooper, J. M. (2004) Knowledge, Nature, and the Good: Essays on Ancient Philosophy. Princeton, N.J.
Cooper, J. M. (ed.) (1997) Plato: Complete Works. Indianapolis, Ind.
Cooper, J. M. and J. F. Procopé (eds. and trans.) (1995) Seneca: Moral and Political Essays. Cambridge.
Couissin, P. (1983) “The Stoicism of the New Academy,” in Burnyeat (1983), 31–63.
Cumming, R. D. (1969) Human Nature and History (2 vols.). Chicago.
Dagger, R. (1989) “Rights,” in Political Innovation and Conceptual Change, eds. T. Ball, J. Farr, and R. L. Hanson. Cambridge: 292–308.
Donahue, C., Jr. (2001) “Ius in the subjective sense in Roman law: reflections on Villey and Tierney,” in A Ennio Cortese, eds. D. Maffei, I. Birocchi, M. Caravale, E. Conte, and U. Petronio. Rome: 506–35.
Douglas, A. E. (1995) “Form and content in the Tusculan Disputations,” in Powell (1995), 197–218.
Drexler, H. (1958) “Respublica,” Maia 10: 3–37.
Dyck, A. R. (2004) A Commentary on Cicero, De legibus. Ann Arbor, Mich.
Estlund, D. M. (2008) Democratic Authority: A Philosophical Framework. Princeton, N.J.
Fantham, E. (2004) The Roman World of Cicero’s De Oratore. Oxford.
Ferrary, J.-L. (1974) “Le discours de Laelius dans le troisième livre du De Re Publica de Cicéron,”MEFRA 86.2: 745–71.
Ferrary, J.-L. (1977) “Le discours de Philus (Cicéron, De Re Publicaiii, 8–31) et la philosophie de Carnéade’, REL 55: 128–56.
Ferrary, J.-L. (1984) “L’archéologie du De Re Publica (2, 2, 4–37, 63): Cicéron entre Polybe et Platon,”JRS 74: 87–98.
Ferrary, J.-L. (1995) “The statesman and the law in the political philosophy of Cicero,” in Laks and Schofield (1995), 48–73.
Finley, M. I. (1983) Politics in the Ancient World. Cambridge.
Finnis, J. (1980) Natural Law and Natural Rights. Oxford.
Fortenbaugh, W. W. and P. Steinmetz (eds.) (1989) Cicero’s Knowledge of the Peripatos. New Brunswick, N.J.
Fott, D. S. (2009) “How Machiavellian is Cicero?” in The Arts of Rule: Essays in Honor of Harvey C. Mansfield, eds. S. R. Krause and M. A. McGrail. Lanham, Md.: 149–65.
Fox, M. (2007) Cicero’s Philosophy of History. Oxford.
Franco, P. (1990) The Political Philosophy of Michael Oakeshott. New Haven, Conn.
Frede, D. (1989) “Constitution and citizenship: Peripatetic influence on Cicero’s political conceptions in the De re publica,” in Fortenbaugh and Steinmetz (1989), 77–100.
Frede, D. (2002) “Theodicy and providential care in Stoicism,” in Traditions in Theology: Studies in Hellenistic Theology, Its Background and Aftermath, eds. D. Frede and A. Laks. Leiden: 85–117.
Frede, M. (1992) “Plato’s arguments and the dialogue form,” in Methods of Interpreting Plato and His Dialogues, eds. J. Klagge and N. Smith. OSAPh, supplementary volume. Oxford: 201–19.
Frede, M. (1994) “The Stoic conception of reason,” in Hellenistic Philosophy, ed. K. J. Boudouris. Athens: 2.50–61.
Frede, M. (1996) “Introduction,” in Rationality in Greek Thought, eds. M. Frede and G. Striker. Oxford: 1–28.
Gallagher, R. L. (2001) “Metaphor in Cicero’s De Re Publica,”CQ 51.2: 509–19.
Galston, W. A. (2010) “Realism in political theory,”European Journal of Political Theory 9: 385–411.
Garnsey, P. (2007) Thinking about Property: From Antiquity to the Age of Revolution. Cambridge.
George, R. P. (ed.) (1992) Natural Law Theory: Contemporary Essays. Oxford.
Geuss, R. (2008) Philosophy and Real Politics. Princeton, N.J.
Gillespie, M. A. (2008) The Theological Origins of Modernity. Chicago.
Girardet, K. (1977) “Ciceros Urteil über die Entstehung des Tribunates als Institution der römischen Verfassung (Rep. 2, 57–9),” in Lippold and Himmelmann (1977), 179–200.
Girardet, K. (1983) Die Ordnung der Welt: Ein Beitrag zur philosophischen und politischen Interpretation von Ciceros Schrift De Legibus. Wiesbaden.
Glendon, M. A. (1991) Rights Talk: The Impoverishment of Political Discourse. New York.
Glucker, J. (1978) Antiochus and the Late Academy. Göttingen.
Glucker, J. (1988) “Cicero’s philosophical affiliations,” in The Question of “Eclecticism”: Studies in Later Greek Philosophy, eds. J. M. Dillon and A. A. Long. Berkeley, Calif.: 34–69.
Glucker, J. (1997) “Socrates in the Academic books and other Ciceronian works,” in Assent and Argument: Studies in Cicero’s Academic Books, eds. B. Inwood and J. Mansfeld. Leiden and New York: 58–88.
Glucker, J. (2001) “Carneades in Rome: some unsolved problems,” in Powell and North (2001), 57–82.
Goldhill, S. (ed.) (2008) The End of Dialogue in Antiquity. Cambridge.
Goldschmidt, V. (1947) Le Paradigme dans la dialectique platonicienne. Paris.
Görler, W. (1995) “Silencing the troublemaker: De legibus 1.39 and the continuity of Cicero’s skepticism,” in Powell (1995), 85–113.
Grant, R. W. (1987) John Locke’s Liberalism. Chicago.
Griffin, M. T. (1996) “When is thought political?”Apeiron 29: 269–82.
Griffin, M. T. and E. M. Atkins (eds. and trans.) (1991) Cicero: On Duties. Cambridge.
Griswold, C., Jr. (ed.) (1988) Platonic Writings: Platonic Readings. New York.
Gwyn, W. B. (1965) The Meaning of the Separation of Powers: An Analysis of the Doctrine from Its Origin to the Adoption of the United States Constitution. New Orleans, La.
Hahm, D. E. (1995) “Polybius’ applied political theory,” in Laks and Schofield (1995), 7–47.
Hahm, D. E. (2000) “Kings and constitutions: Hellenistic theories,” in Rowe and Schofield (2000), 457–76.
Hahm, D. E. (2009) “The mixed constitution in Greek thought,” in A Companion to Greek and Roman Political Thought, ed. R. K. Balot. Oxford: 178–98.
Hankinson, R. J. (1995) The Sceptics. London.
Harries, J. (2006) Cicero and the Jurists: From Citizens’ Law to the Lawful State. London.
Hauerwas, S. (1987) “On the ‘right’ to be tribal,”Christian Scholar’s Review 16.3: 238–41.
Heinze, R. (1924) “Ciceros ‘Staat’ als politische Tendenzschrift,”Hermes 59: 73–94.
Hexter, J. H. (1956) “Seyssel, Machiavelli, and Polybius vi: the mystery of the missing translation,”Studies in the Renaissance 3: 75–96.
Hohfeld, W. N. (1919) Fundamental Legal Conceptions. New Haven, Conn.
Horsley, R. A. (1978) “The law of nature in Philo and Cicero,”HThR 71: 35–59.
Howe, D. W. (2009) Making the American Self. Oxford.
Howe, W. W. (1930) “Cicero’s ideal in his De republica,”JRS 20: 24–42.
Inwood, B. (1999) “Rules and reasoning in Stoic ethics,” in Topics in Stoic Philosophy, ed. Katerina Ierodiakonou. Oxford: 95–127.
Inwood, B. and F. D. Miller, Jr. (2007) “Law in Roman philosophy,” in Treatise of Legal Philosophy and General Jurisprudence, vol. vi: A History of the Philosophy of Law from the Ancient Greeks to the Scholastics. Dordrecht: 133–65.
Jaffa, H. V. (1956) “Review of The Theory of the Mixed Constitution in Antiquity: A Critical Analysis of Polybius’ Political Ideas, by Kurt von Fritz.”American Political Science Review 50: 515–19.
Johnston, D. (2000) “The jurists,” in Rowe and Schofield (2000), 616–34.
Kapust, D. J. (2011) Republicanism, Rhetoric, and Roman Political Thought: Sallust, Livy, and Tacitus. Cambridge.
Kaser, M. (1968) Roman Private Law, 2nd edn., trans. R. Dannenbring. Durban.
Kaster, R. A. (ed.) (2006) Cicero: Speech on Behalf of Publius Sestius. Oxford.
Keyes, C. W. (1921) “Original elements in Cicero’s ideal constitution,”AJPh 42: 309–23.
Kidd, I. (1971) “Stoic intermediates and the end for man,” in A. A. Long (1971), 150–72.
Kohns, H. P. (1974) “Consensus iuris – communio utilitatis (zu Cic. Rep. i 39),”Gymnasium 81: 485–98.
Kohns, H. P. (1976) “Prima causa coeundi (zu Cic. Rep.i 39),”Gymnasium 83: 209–14.
Kohns, H. P. (1977) “Libertas populi und libertas civium in Ciceros Schrift De re publica,” in Lippold and Himmelmann (1977), 201–11.
Laks, A. (1990) “Legislation and demiurgy: on the relationship between Plato’s Republic and Laws,”ClAnt 9: 209–29.
Laks, A. (2000) “The Laws,” in Rowe and Schofield (2000), 252–92.
Laks, A. and M. Schofield (eds.) (1995) Justice and Generosity: Studies in Hellenistic Social and Political Philosophy. Cambridge.
Lane, M. (1998) Method and Politics in Plato’s Statesman. Cambridge.
Lévy, C. (1992) Cicero Academicus: Recherches sur les Académiques et sur la philosophie cicéronienne. Rome.
Lieberg, G. (1994) “Das Methodenkapitel in Ciceros Staat (Rep. 2, 11, 21–22),”Mnemosyne 47: 12–32.
Linderski, J. (1986) “The augural law,”ANRW 2.16.3: 2, 146–312.
Linderski, J. (1995) “Cicero and Roman divination,” in Roman Questions: Selected Papers. Stuttgart: 458–84.
Lintott, A. (1997) “The theory of the mixed constitution at Rome,” in Philosophia Togata II: Plato and Aristotle at Rome, eds. J. Barnes and M. T. Griffin. Oxford: 70–85.
Lintott, A. (1999) The Constitution of the Roman Republic. Oxford.
Lintott, A. (2002) “Aristotle and the mixed constitution,” in Alternatives to Athens: Varieties of Political Organization and Community in Ancient Greece, eds. R. Brock and S. Hodkinson. Oxford: 152–66.
Lippold, A. and N. Himmelmann (eds.) (1977) Bonner Festgabe Johannes Straub. Bonn.
Long, A. (2008) “Plato’s dialogues and a common rationale for dialogue form,” in Goldhill (2008), 45–59.
Long, A. A. (1995) “Cicero’s politics in De officiis,” in Laks and Schofield (1995), 213–40.
Long, A. A. (2003) “Roman philosophy,” in The Cambridge Companion to Greek and Roman Philosophy, ed. D. N. Sedley. Cambridge: 184–210.
Long, A. A. (ed.) (1971) Problems in Stoicism. London.
Long, A. A. and D. N. Sedley (eds.) (1987) The Hellenistic Philosophers (2 vols.). Cambridge.
Lord, C. (ed. and trans.) (1984) Aristotle: The Politics. Chicago.
MacIntyre, A. (1981) After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. Notre Dame, Ind.
MacPherson, C. B. (ed.) (1978) Property: Mainstream and Critical Positions. Toronto.
Mansfield, H. (1996) Machiavelli’s Virtue. Chicago.
Mansfield, H. (2001) Machiavelli’s New Modes and Orders. Ithaca, N.Y.
Marquez, X. (2011) “Cicero and the stability of states,”History of Political Thought 32.3: 397–423.
McCabe, M. M. (2006) “Form and the Platonic dialogues,” in A Companion to Plato, ed. H. Benson. Oxford: 39–54.
Mehl, D. D. (1999) “Comprehending Cicero’s De Legibus.” Dissertation, University of Virginia.
Metzger, E. (1998) A Companion to Justinian’s Institutes. London.
Meyer, E. (1919) Caesars Monarchie und das Principat des Pompeius, 2nd edn. Stuttgart.
Michel, A. (1965) “A propos de l’art du dialogue dans le De Republica. L’idéal et la réalité chez Cicéron,”REL 43: 237–61.
Michel, J. (1956) “Sur les origines du ‘ius gentium’,”RIDA 3: 313–48.
Miller, F. D., Jr. (1995) Nature, Justice, and Rights in Aristotle’s Politics. Oxford.
Miller, F. D., (2012) “The rule of reason in Plato’s Laws,” in Reason, Religion, and Natural Law: From Plato to Spinoza, ed. J. A. Jacobs. Oxford: 31–56.
Mitchell, T. N. (1991) Cicero: The Senior Statesman. New Haven, Conn.
Mitsis, P. (1994) “Natural law and natural right in post-Aristotelian philosophy: the Stoics and their critics,”ANRW 2.36.7: 4,812–50.
Moatti, C. (1988) “Tradition et raison chez Cicéron: l’émergence de la rationalité politique à la fin de la République romaine,”MEFRA 100.1: 385–430.
Moatti, C. (1997) La raison de Rome: Naissance de l’esprit critique à la fin de la République. Paris.
Morford, M. (2002) The Roman Philosophers: From the Time of Cato the Censor to the Death of Marcus Aurelius. London.
Morris, C. W. (2005) “Natural rights and political legitimacy,”Social Philosophy and Policy 22: 314–29.
Morrow, G. (1960) Plato’s Cretan City: A Historical Interpretation of the Laws. Princeton, N.J.
Morrow, G. (1965) “Necessity and persuasion in Plato’s Timaeus,” in Studies in Plato’s Metaphysics, ed. R. E. Allen. London: 421–38.
Nicgorski, W. (1991) “Cicero’s focus: from the best regime to the model statesman,”Political Theory 19: 230–51.
Nicgorski, W. (2012) “Cicero and the rebirth of political philosophy,” in Cicero’s Practical Philosophy, ed. W. Nicgorski. Notre Dame, Ind.: 242–82.
Nichols, J. H., Jr. (1979) “On the proper use of ancient political philosophy: A comment on Steven Taylor Holmes’ ‘Aristippus in and out of Athens’,”American Political Science Review 73.1: 129–33.
Nicolet, C. (1970) “Cicéron, Platon et le vote secret,”Historia 19: 39–66.
Nippel, W. (1980) Mischverfassungtheorie und Verfassungsrealität in Antike und früher Neuzeit. Stuttgart.
Oakeshott, M. (1962) Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays. New York.
Oakeshott, M. (2006) Lectures in the History of Political Thought, ed. T. Nardin and L. O’Sullivan. Exeter.
Pédech, P. (1964) La méthode historique de Polybe. Paris.
Perelli, L. (1972) “Natura e ratio nel II libro del De Re Publica Ciceroniano,”Rivista di Filologia e di Istruzione Classica 100: 295–311.
Perelli, L. (1990) Il pensiero politico di Cicerone: Tra filosofia greca e ideologia aristocratica Romana. Florence.
Pohlenz, M. (1931) “Cicero De Re Publica als Kunstwerk,” in Festschrift R. Reitzenstein, ed. E. Fraenkel and H. Fränkel. Leipzig: 70–105.
Pohlenz, M. (1934) Antikes Führertum: Cicero de Officiis und das Lebensideal des Panaitios. Leipzig and Berlin.
Pohlenz, M. (1970–2) Die Stoa: Geschichte einer geistigen Bewegung, 4th edn. (2 vols.). Göttingen.
Pöschl, V. (1936) Römischer Staat und griechisches Staatsdenken bei Cicero: Untersuchungen zu Ciceros Schrift de republica. Berlin.
Powell, J. G. F. (1994) “The rector rei publicae of Cicero’s De Republica,”SCI 13: 19–29.
Powell, J. G. F. (1996) “Second thoughts on the Dream of Scipio,” Papers of the Leeds International Latin Seminar 9: 13–27.
Powell, J. G. F. (2001) “Were Cicero’s Laws the laws of Cicero’s Republic?” in Powell and North (2001), 17–39.
Powell, J. G. F. (ed.) (1995) Cicero the Philosopher: 12 Papers. Oxford.
Powell, J. G. F. and J. A. North (eds.) (2001) Cicero’s Republic. BICS Supplement 76. London.
Radford, R. (2002) Cicero: A Study in the Origins of Republican Philosophy. Amsterdam.
Rawls, J. (1988) “The priority of right and ideas of the good,”Philosophy and Public Affairs 17.4: 251–76.
Rawson, E. (1973) “The interpretation of Cicero’s De legibus,”ANRW 1.4: 334–56.
Rawson, E. (1985) Intellectual Life in the Late Roman Republic. Baltimore, Md.
Reitzenstein, R. (1893) “Drei Vermutungen zur Geschichte der römischen Literatur,” in Festschrift Theodor Mommsen zum fünfzigjährigen Doctorjubiläum, eds. P. Jörs, E. Schwartz, and R. Reitzenstein. Marburg: 1–55.
Reitzenstein, R. (1917) Die Idee des Principats bei Cicero und Augustus. Nachrichten der Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen. Göttingen.
Richard, C. J. (1994) The Founders and the Classics. Cambridge, Mass.
Rowe, C. J. and M. Schofield (eds.) (2000) The Cambridge History of Greek and Roman Political Thought. Cambridge.
Ruch, M. (1948) “La composition du De republica.”REL 26: 157–71.
Rudd, N. and J. G. F. Powell (eds.) (1998) Cicero: The Republic, The Laws. Oxford.
Rüpke, J. (2012). Religion in Republican Rome: Rationalization and Ritual Change. Philadelphia, Penn.
Ryan, A. (ed.) (1993) Justice. Oxford.
Sabine, G. H. and S. B. Smith (eds.) (1976) Marcus Tullius Cicero: On the Commonwealth. New York.
Schmekel, A. (1892) Die Philosophie der mittleren Stoa in ihrem geschichtlichen Zusammenhange. Berlin.
Schmidt, P. L. (1969) Die Abfassungszeit von Ciceros Schrift über die Gesetze. Rome.
Schofield, M. (1986) “Cicero for and against divination,”JRS 76: 47–65.
Schofield, M. (1995) “Cicero’s definition of Res Publica,” in Powell (1995), 63–83, reprinted in Schofield (1999a) as Ch. 10.
Schofield, M. (1996) “Sharing in the constitution,”The Review of Metaphysics 49.4: 831–58, reprinted in Schofield (1999a) as Ch. 8.
Schofield, M. (1999a) Saving the City: Philosopher-Kings and Other Classical Paradigms. London and New York.
Schofield, M. (1999b) The Stoic Idea of the City. Chicago.
Schofield, M. (1999c) “Social and political thought,” in Algra, Barnes, Mansfeld, and Schofield (1999), 739–70.
Schofield, M. (1999d) “Academic epistemology,” in Algra, Barnes, Mansfeld, and Schofield (1999), 323–51.
Schofield, M. (2000) “Epicurean and Stoic political thought,” in Rowe and Schofield (2000), 435–56.
Schofield, M. (2006) Plato: Political Philosophy. Oxford.
Schofield, M. (2008) “Ciceronian dialogue,” in Goldhill (2008), 63–84.
Schofield, M. (2012) “Antiochus on social virtue,” in The Philosophy of Antiochus, ed. D. N. Sedley. Cambridge: 173–87.
Scruton, R. (2010) The Uses of Pessimism and the Danger of False Hope. Oxford.
Sedley, D. N. (1981) “The end of the Academy,”Phronesis 26: 67–75.
Sedley, D. N. (1983) “The motivation of Greek skepticism,” in Burnyeat (1983), 9–29.
Sen, A. (2009) The Idea of Justice. Cambridge, Mass.
Sharples, R. W. (1986) “Cicero’s Republic and Greek political thought,”Polis 5.2: 30–50.
Sigmund, P. E. (1971) Natural Law in Political Thought. Cambridge, Mass.
Skinner, Q. (1978) Foundations of Modern Political Thought (2 vols.). Cambridge.
Skinner, Q. (1998) Liberty Before Liberalism. Cambridge.
Stalley, R. F. (1983) An Introduction to Plato’s Laws. Oxford.
Stanlis, P. J. (1958) Edmund Burke and the Natural Law. Ann Arbor, Mich.
Stark, R. (1954) “Ciceros Staatsdefinition,”La Nouvelle Clio 6: 56–69.
Steel, C. E. W. (2005) Reading Cicero: Genre and Performance in Late Republican Rome. London.
Steinmetz, P. (1989) “Beobachtungen zu Ciceros philosophischen Standpunkt,” in Fortenbaugh and Steinmetz (1989), 1–22.
Strauss, L. (1964) The City and the Man. Chicago.
Strauss, L. (1965) Natural Right and History. Paperback edn. Chicago.
Taeger, F. (1922) Die Archaeologie des Polybios. Stuttgart.
Tierney, B. (1997) The Idea of Natural Rights: Studies on Natural Rights, Natural Law and Church Law 1150–1625. Emory University Studies in Law and Religion. Atlanta, Ga.
Tuck, R. (1983) “Grotius, Carneades and Hobbes,”Grotiana 4: 43–62.
Tuck, R. (1999) “The ‘modern’ theory of natural law,” in The Languages of Political Theory in Early-Modern Europe, ed. A. Pagden. Cambridge: 51–61.
Turpin, J. (1986) “Cicéron, De legibusi–ii et la religion romaine: une interprétation philosophique à la veille du principat,”ANRW 2.16.3: 1,877–908.
Vander Waerdt, P. A. (1991) “Politics and philosophy in Stoicism,”OSAPh 9: 185–211.
Vander Waerdt, P. A. (1994a) “Philosophical influence on Roman jurisprudence? The case of Stoicism and natural law,”ANRW 2.36.7: 4,851–900.
Vander Waerdt, P. A. (1994b) “Zeno’s Republic and the origins of natural law,” in The Socratic Movement, ed. P. A. Vander Waerdt. Ithaca, N.Y.: 272–308.
Villey, M. (1946) “L’idée du droit subjectif et les systèmes juridiques romains”, Revue historique de droit français et étranger, ser. 4, 24–5: 201–28, reprinted as “Les institutes de Gaius et l’idée du droit subjectif,” in Villey (1962): 169–88.
Villey, M. (1953–4) “Les origins de la notion de droit subjectif,”Archives de philosophie du droit 2: 163–87, reprinted in Villey (1962): 221–50.
Villey, M. (1961) “Abrégé du droit naturel classique,”Archives de philosophie du droit 6: 25–72.
Villey, M. (1962) Leçons d’histoire de la philosophie du droit, 2nd edn. Paris.
Villey, M. (1964) “La genèse du droit subjectif chez Gillaume d’Occam,”Archives de philosophie du droit 9: 97–127.
Villey, M. (1971) “Rückkehr zur Rechtsphilosophie,” in Das Neue Cicerobild, ed. K. Büchner. Darmstadt: 259–303.
Vogt, K. (2008) Law, Reason, and the Cosmic City. Oxford.
von Fritz, K. (1954) The Theory of the Mixed Constitution in Antiquity: A Critical Analysis of Polybius’ Political Ideas. New York.
Walbank, F. W. (1957) A Historical Commentary on Polybius, vol. 1. Oxford.
Walbank, F. W. (1972) Polybius. Berkeley, Calif.
Walbank, F. W. (2002) Polybius, Rome and the Hellenistic World: Essays and Reflections. Cambridge.
Waterfield, R. (ed. and trans.) (2002) Plato: Phaedrus. Oxford.
Watson, G. (1971) “The natural law and Stoicism,” in A. A. Long (1971), 216–38.
Werner, R. (1973) “Über Herkunft und Bedeutung von Ciceros Staatsdefinition,”Chiron 3: 163–78.
Wilson, W. (1896) Mere Literature. Boston, Mass.
Wirszubski, C. (1950) Libertas as a Political Idea at Rome during the Late Republic and Early Principate. Cambridge.
Wolterstorff, N. (2007) Justice: Rights and Wrongs. Princeton, N.J.
Wood, G. S. (2006) Revolutionary Characters: What Made the Founders Different. New York.
Wood, N. (1986) “Populares and circumcelliones: the vocabulary of ‘fallen man’ in Cicero and St. Augustine,”History of Political Thought 7: 33–51.
Wood, N. (1988) Cicero’s Social and Political Thought. Berkeley, Calif.
Yarbrough, J. M. (1998) American Virtues: Thomas Jefferson on the Character of a Free People. Lawrence, Kans.
Yarbrough, J. M. (2000) “Thomas Jefferson and republicanism,” in Thomas Jefferson and the Politics of Nature, ed. T. S. Engeman. Notre Dame, Ind.: 59–80.
Zetzel, J. E. G. (1996) “Natural law and poetic justice: a Carneadean debate in Cicero and Virgil,”CPh 91.4: 297–319.
Zetzel, J. E. G. (2001) “Citizen and commonwealth in De Re Publica Book 4,” in Powell and North (2001), 83–97.
Zetzel, J. E. G. (ed.) (1995) Cicero, De republica: Selections. Cambridge.
Zetzel, J. E. G. (ed. and trans.) (1999) Cicero: On the Commonwealth and On the Laws. Cambridge.
Ziegler, K. (ed.) (1969) De Re Publica. Leipzig.
Zuckert, M. P. (1989) “Bringing philosophy down from the heavens: natural right in the Roman law,”Review of Politics 51.1: 70–85.
