Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- List of Maps
- Maps
- Introduction
- 1 The Singapore Mutiny of 1915: Global Origins in a Global War
- 2 The Defeat of the Singapore Mutiny: Regional Expression of Global Alliances
- 3 Germans, Indians, and the War in the Dutch East Indies
- 4 The S.S. Maverick and the Unraveling of a Global Conspiracy
- 5 Siam and the Anti-Allied Conspiracies
- 6 China, Germany, and the Viet Nam Restoration Association
- Conclusion
- Select Bibliography
- Index
2 - The Defeat of the Singapore Mutiny: Regional Expression of Global Alliances
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 April 2017
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- List of Maps
- Maps
- Introduction
- 1 The Singapore Mutiny of 1915: Global Origins in a Global War
- 2 The Defeat of the Singapore Mutiny: Regional Expression of Global Alliances
- 3 Germans, Indians, and the War in the Dutch East Indies
- 4 The S.S. Maverick and the Unraveling of a Global Conspiracy
- 5 Siam and the Anti-Allied Conspiracies
- 6 China, Germany, and the Viet Nam Restoration Association
- Conclusion
- Select Bibliography
- Index
Summary
If the causes of the mutiny demonstrate the global webs that brought the war to Southeast Asia, so too did official and civil responses to it. The conditions created by World War I played a critical role in shaping the actions taken by representatives of various governments and civil populations during the mutiny. This was because decisions made at the centers of government about whether (and on whose side) to enter the war reverberated around the world as a result of empire. In Southeast Asia, colonial governments in Malaya and Indochina whose home countries joined the Allies now found themselves in even closer relationships of obligation with Japan and Russia. Meanwhile, colonies and states whose governments remained neutral – in this case the Dutch East Indies and China – nevertheless found it necessary to respond to the events of the mutiny. In the case of China, the desire to stay in Britain's good graces led the government to instruct the huge Chinese population in Singapore to remain calm. In the case of the Dutch East Indies, British calls for help led the Dutch to respond by playing both ends against the middle in order to prevent being dragged into the war on either side. Finally, civil populations of Japanese, Chinese, Indians, and Arab Muslims were either guided by their consuls to make their orientation to the war clear, or else found it expedient to do so for their own reasons.
These official and civil responses to the mutiny allow us to see the concrete impact of wartime alliances as they played out on the ground on one small island in Southeast Asia in early 1915. While Chapters 3–6 will explore the effects of these alliances over a larger area and a longer chronology, here we are able to see the complex ways they were expressed in response to a single event. This chapter begins by setting the narrative framework for the coordinated response to the mutiny, which included actors from Britain, France, Russia, Japan, the Netherlands, and China.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- World War One in Southeast AsiaColonialism and Anticolonialism in an Era of Global Conflict, pp. 55 - 87Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017