Retroaction: how indicators feed back onto quantified actors

doi:10.1017/CBO9781316091265.013

13 - Retroaction: how indicators feed back onto quantified actors

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 October 2015

Edited by

Sung-Joon Park and

Alain Desrosières: Affiliation:
Institut National de la Statistique et des Etudes Economiques (INSEE)
Richard Rottenburg: Affiliation:
Martin Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Germany
Sally E. Merry: Affiliation:
New York University
Sung-Joon Park: Affiliation:
Martin Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Germany
Johanna Mugler: Affiliation:
Universität Bern, Switzerland

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Introduction

Are quantitative indicators an instrument of emancipation or an instrument of oppression? In line with the philosophy of Enlightenment, they were generally perceived as a means of giving society a mirror-image of itself so that it could move towards greater justice. Today, in the world of neoliberal economics, they are mostly seen as an excuse to fuel individualism and competition between individuals, particularly through the performance indicators involved in management techniques, such as benchmarking. They can have direct effects, repercussions, qualified here as feedback, on those in charge of the statistical monitoring of unemployment. For example, the director of the French national statistics bureau, INSEE, was suspended for having ‘badly managed’ the conflict over unemployment figures. Deep budget cuts to the statistics bureau were announced. In spite of that, public statistics in France still enjoyed a good reputation among their users: economic actors, journalists, trade unionists, teachers and researchers. The media published numerous opinion pieces deploring what was perceived as a threat to dismantle the system. A commonly used metaphor was ‘breaking the thermometer in order to treat the fever’.

Shortly thereafter, a young INSEE researcher was struck by a revealing incident. While marching in a trade union demonstration against government policy to dismantle public services, she was soliciting demonstrators to show their support by signing a petition. To her surprise she was told: ‘Your statistics are only used to control us, police us, and make our working conditions worse.’ Again in 2009, academics, researchers and health workers were up in arms against the ‘reforms’ being applied to their activities, which involved quantified evaluations of their ‘performance’. This would lead, as they saw it, to the dispossession of their specific skills for the benefit of ‘New Public Management’, which relies heavily on the use of quantitative indicators. A culture of dissent emerged against the generalization of quantification among academic physicians. Resistance against quantitative evaluation was one of its keywords.

Spring 2009 was also a season for other demands of a completely different kind. The French government asked the eminent economists Amartya Sen, Joseph Stiglitz and Jean-Paul Fitoussi to propose revisions for the calculation of Gross Domestic Product (GDP). They suspected that GDP was a poor measure of the ‘wealth’ generated by a nation within a year. Activist researchers had already anticipated this request, which was given a great deal of media coverage.

Type: Chapter
Information: The World of Indicators
The Making of Governmental Knowledge through Quantification
, pp. 329 - 353

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316091265.013 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Armatte, Michel 1995. Histoire du Modèle linéaire. Formes et usages en statistique et en économétrie jusqu'en 1945, thèse.Paris: EHESSGoogle Scholar

Armatte, Michel and Dalmedico, Amy Dahan 2004. ‘Modèles et Modélisations (1950–2000): nouvelles pratiques, nouveaux enjeux’, Revue d'Histoire des Sciences 57(2): 243–303Google Scholar

Austin, John L. 1962. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: ClarendonGoogle Scholar

Bird, Sheila M. 2004. ‘Editorial: Performance Monitoring in the Public Services’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 167(3): 381–3Google Scholar

Blum, Alain and Mespoulet, Martine 2003. L'anarchie bureaucratique. Statistique et pouvoir sous Staline.Paris: La DécouverteGoogle Scholar

Boltanski, Luc and Chiapello, Eve 2005. The New Spirit of Capitalism. London: VersoGoogle Scholar

Boskin, Michael J.et al. 1996. Toward a More Accurate Measure of the Cost of Living, Final Report to the Senate Finance Committee.Washington, D.C.: US Government Printing OfficeGoogle Scholar

Bowker, Geoffrey and Leigh Star, Susan 1999. Sorting Things Out: Classification and its Consequences. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT PressGoogle Scholar

Brousse, Cécil 2005. ‘Définir et compter les sans-abri en Europe: enjeux et controverses’, Genèses 58: 48–71CrossRef Google Scholar

Isabelle, Bruno 2008. ‘La Recherche scientifique au crible du benchmarking. Petite histoire d'une technologie de gouvernement’, Revue d'histoire moderne et contemporaine 5(55-4 bis): 28–45Google Scholar

Bruno, Isabelle, Jacquot, Sophie and Mandin, Lou 2006. ‘Europeanization through Its Instrumentation: Benchmarking, Mainstreaming and the Open Method of Coordination: Toolbox or Pandora's Box?’, Journal of European Public Policy 13(4): 519–36CrossRef Google Scholar

Burchell, Graham, Gordon, Colin and Miller, Peter 1991. The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality. Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Caldwell, Bruce 1997. ‘Hayek and Socialism’, Journal of Economic Literature 35(4): 1856–90Google Scholar

Michel, Callon 2007. ‘What Does It Mean to Say that Economics is Performative?’ in MacKenzie, D., Muniesa, F. and Siu, L. (eds.), Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, pp. 311–57Google Scholar

Capron, Michel (ed.) 2005. Les normes comptables internationales, instruments du capitalisme financier. Paris: La DécouverteGoogle Scholar

Cassiers, Isabelle and Thiry, Geraldine 2014. A High-Stakes Shift: Turning the Tide from GDP to New Prosperity Indicators, IRES Discussion Paper 2014002. Louvain: Institut de Recherches Economiques et Sociales, Université catholique de LouvainGoogle Scholar

Chiapello, Eve and Desrosières, Alain 2006. ‘La quantification de l’économie et la recherche en sciences sociales: paradoxes, contradictions et omissions. Le cas exemplaire de la “Positive Accounting Theory”’ in Eymard-Duvernay, F. (ed.), L’économie des conventions. Méthodes et résultats, vol. 1, Débats. Paris: La Découverte, pp. 297–310Google Scholar

Chiapello, Eve and Medjad, Karim 2009. ‘An Unprecedented Privatisation of Mandatory Standard-setting: The Case of European Accounting Policy’, Critical Perspectives on Accounting 20(4): 448–68CrossRef Google Scholar

Alex, Chrystal K. and Mizen, Paul D. 2001. Goodhart's Law: Its Origin, Meaning and Implications for Monetary Policy, Festschrift in Honour of Charles Goodhart, 15–16 November, Bank of EnglandGoogle Scholar

Dahan, Amy and Pestre, Dominique 2004. Les sciences pour la guerre. 1940–1960. Paris: Éditions de l'EHESSGoogle Scholar

Dardot, Pierre and Laval, Christian 2009. La nouvelle raison du monde. Essai sur la société néolibérale.Paris: La DécouverteGoogle Scholar

Daston, Lorraine 1992. ‘Objectivity and the Escape from Perspective’, Social Studies of Science 22(4): 597–618CrossRef Google Scholar

Dehousse, Renaud 2003. The Open Method of Coordination: A New Policy Paradigm?, Les Cahiers européens de Sciences Po 3Google Scholar

Desrosières, Alain 1998. The Politics of Large Numbers: A History of Statistical Reasoning. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar

Desrosières, Alain 2003. ‘Managing the Economy’ in Porter, T. and Ross, D. (eds.), The Cambridge History of Science, vol. 7, The Modern Social Sciences. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, pp. 553–64Google Scholar

Desrosières, Alain 2007. ‘Surveys Versus Administrative Records: Reflections on the Duality of Statistical Sources’, Courrier des statistiques 13: 7–19Google Scholar

Desrosières, Alain 2008a. Pour une sociologie historique de la quantification. Paris: Presses de l’École des minesCrossRef Google Scholar

Desrosières, Alain 2008b. Gouverner par les nombres. Paris: Presses de l'École des minesCrossRef Google Scholar

Didier, Emmanuel 2009. En quoi consiste l'Amérique? Les statistiques, le New Deal et la démocratie. Paris: La DécouverteGoogle Scholar

Didier, Emmanuel 2012. ‘Public Safety and Wall Street’, Limn 2, http://limn.it/public-safety-and-wall-street/Google Scholar

Espeland, Wendy N. and Sauder, Michael 2007. ‘Rankings and Reactivity: How Public Measures Recreate Social Worlds’, American Journal of Sociology 113(1): 1–40CrossRef Google Scholar

Espeland, Wendy N. and Stevens, Mitchell L. 1998. ‘Commensuration as a Social Process’, Annual Review of Sociology 24: 313–43CrossRef Google Scholar

Fagot-Largeault, Ane 1991. ‘Réflexions sur la notion de qualité de la vie’, Archives de philosophie du droit, Droit et Science 36: 135–53Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel 2007. Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the Collége de France, 1977–78. Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave MacmillanGoogle Scholar

Foucault, Michel 2008. The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978–1979.New York: Palgrave MacmillanGoogle Scholar

Fourquet, François 1980. Les comptes de la puissance. Histoire de la comptabilité nationale et du Plan.Paris: Encres-RecherchesGoogle Scholar

Gadrey, Jean J. and Jany-Catrice, Florence 2006. The New Indicators of Well-being and Development. London: Palgrave MacmillanCrossRef Google Scholar

Hood, Christopher 1995. ‘Contemporary Public Management: A New Paradigm?’, Public Policy and Administration 10(2): 104–17CrossRef Google Scholar

Hood, Christopher 2002. ‘Control, Bargains, and Cheating: The Politics of Public-service Reform’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 12 (3): 309–32CrossRef Google Scholar

Hopwood, Anthony G. and Miller, Peter (eds.) 1994. Accounting as Social and Institutional Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Lascoumes, Pierre and Le Gales, Patrick 2007. ‘Understanding Public Policy through Its Instruments: From the Nature of Instruments to the Sociology of Public Policy Instrumentation’, Governance 201: 1–21Google Scholar

Latour, Bruno 1988. The Pasteurization of France. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar

Le Gales, Patrick 2004. ‘Contrôle et surveillance. La restructuration de l’État en Grande-Bretagne’ in Lascoumes, P. and Gales, P. Le (eds.), Gouverner par les instruments. Paris: Presse de Sciences-Po, pp. 237–71Google Scholar

Lefrancq, Stéphane 2004. ‘Recherche et action: la comptabilité dans son contexte. Une étude de la politique éditoriale d'Accounting Organizations dans Society’, Comptabilité Contrôle Audit 10: 297–315CrossRef Google Scholar

Lie, Einar 2002. ‘The Rise and Fall of Sampling Methods in Norway 1875–1906’, Science in Context 15(3): 385–409Google Scholar

Miller, Peter 1992. ‘Accounting and Objectivity: The Invention of Calculating Selves and Calculable Spaces’, Annals of Scholarship 9(1/2): 61–86Google Scholar

Miller, Peter and O'Leary, Ted 1987. ‘Accounting and the Construction of the Governable Person’, Accounting, Organizations and Society 12(3): 235–65CrossRef Google Scholar

Morgenstern, Oskar 1944/1963. On the Accuracy of Economic Observations. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar

Nivière, Delphine 2005. ‘Négocier une statistique européenne: le cas de la pauvreté’, Genèses 58: 28–47CrossRef Google Scholar

Pestre, Dominique 2006. Introduction aux Science Studies. Paris: La Découverte/RepèresGoogle Scholar

Pezet, Eric (ed.) 2007. Management et conduite de soi. Enquête sur les ascèses de la performance. Paris: VuibertGoogle Scholar

Polanyi, Karl 1944. The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. Boston, N.J.: Beacon HillGoogle Scholar

Porter, Theodore M. 1995. Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life.Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar

Power, Michael 1999. The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification. Oxford: Oxford University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Power, Michael 2004. ‘Counting, Control and Calculation: Reflections on Measuring and Management’, Human Relations 57(6): 765–83CrossRef Google Scholar

Prevost, Jean-Guy 2009. A Total Science: Statistics in Liberal and Fascist Italy. Quebec/Ontario: McGill Queens University PressGoogle Scholar

Salais, Robert 2004. ‘La Politique des indicateurs. Du taux de chômage au taux d'emploi dans la stratégie européenne pour l'emploi (SEE)’ in Zimmermann, B. (ed.), Action publique et sciences sociales. Paris: MSH, pp. 287–331Google Scholar

Supiot, Alain 2010. L'esprit de Philadelphie: la justice sociale face au marché total. Paris: SeuilGoogle Scholar

Thévenot, Laurent 1984. ‘Rules and Implements: Investments in Forms’, Social Science Information 23(1): 1–45CrossRef Google Scholar

Vanoli, André 2005. A History of National Accounting. Amsterdam: IOS PressGoogle Scholar

Watts, Ross L. and Zimmerman, Jerold L. 1978. ‘Towards a Positive Theory of the Determination of Accounting Standards’, Accounting Review 53(1): 112–34Google Scholar