Abd al-Jabber, Faleh. “Why the Uprisings Failed.” Middle East Report, No. 176 (May–June 1992): 2–14.Google Scholar

Abegglen, Christoph M. V. “Clausewitz and Beaufre – The Relationship of Politics and War.” War Studies Program, King’s College, London, circa 2000, www.military.ch/abegglen/papers/clausewitz_and_beaufre.pdfGoogle Scholar

Abt, Clark C. A Strategy for Terminating a Nuclear War. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Acheson, Dean. The Korean War. New York: W. W. Norton, 1971.Google Scholar

Acheson, Dean. Present at the Creation: My Years in the State Department. New York: W. W. Norton, 1969.Google Scholar

Ackerman, Bruce and Hathaway, Oona. “Limited War and the Constitution: Iraq and the Crisis of Presidential Legality.” Michigan Law Review, Vol. 109, No.4 (February 2011): 447–517.Google Scholar

Adamsky, Dmitry (Dima). “If War Comes Tomorrow: Russian Thinking about ‘Regional Nuclear Deterrence.’” The Journal of Slavic Military Studies, Vol. 27, No. 1 (2014): 163–188.Google Scholar

Agov, Avram. “North Korea’s Alliances and the Unfinished Korean War.” The Journal of Korean Studies, Vol. 18, No. 2 (fall 2013): 237–238.Google Scholar

Ahmed, Ali. India’s Doctrine Puzzle: Limiting War in South Asia. New Delhi: Routledge, 2014.Google Scholar

Ahmed, Ali. India’s Limited War Doctrine: The Structural Factor. New Delhi: Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses, 2012.Google Scholar

Ahmed, Ali. “Political Dimensions of Limited War.” Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses (March 29, 2010), www.idsa.in/idsacomments/PoliticalDimensionsofLimitedWar_aahmed_290310Google Scholar

Ahmed, Ali.  “Preparing for ‘Limited Nuclear War.’” Military and Defence Articles, No. 982 (March 7, 2003).Google Scholar

Ahmed, Ali. “Towards a Proactive Military Strategy: ‘Cold Start and Stop.’” Strategic Analysis, Vol. 35, No. 3 (2011): 401–416.Google Scholar

Ahmed, Firdaus. “The Impetus behind Limited War.” Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies (July 24, 2002), http://scotomastudio.com/the-impetus-behind-limited-war/Google Scholar

Åkerman, Nordal. On the Doctrine of Limited War. Lund: Berlingska Boktryckeriet, 1972.Google Scholar

Akers, Joshua K. “Limited War, Limited Enthusiasm: Sexuality, Disillusionment, Survival, and the Changing Landscape of War Culture in Korean War-era Comic Books and Soldier Iconography.” MA thesis, James Madison University, 2013.Google Scholar

Albert, Stuart and Luck, Edward C., eds. On the Endings of Wars. Port Washington, NY: Kennikat Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Alexander, Martin S. and Keiger, John F. V.. “France and the Algerian War: Strategy, Operations, and Diplomacy.” Journal of Strategic Studies, Vol. 25, No. 2 (2002): 1–32.Google Scholar

Alexander, Martin S. and Keiger, John F. V. “Limiting Arms, Enforcing Limits: International Inspections and the Challenges of Compellance in Germany Post-1919, Iraq Post-1991.” Journal of Strategic Studies, Vol. 29, No. 2 (2006): 345–394.Google Scholar

Allison, William Thomas. The Gulf War, 1990–91. New York: Palgrave, 2012.Google Scholar

Allotey, Sam, et al. Planning and Execution of War Termination. Maxwell Air Force Base, AL: Air Command and Staff College, 1997.Google Scholar

Arkin, William, von Hippel, Frank, and Levi, Barbara G.. “Addendum: The Consequences of a ‘Limited’ Nuclear War in East and West Germany.” Ambio, Vol. 12, No. 1 (1983): 57.Google Scholar

Arkin, William, von Hippel, Frank, and Levi, Barbara G. “Army Operations in Limited War.” Army Information Digest, Vol. 13 (June 1958): 41–48.Google Scholar

Arkin, William, von Hippel, Frank, and Levi, Barbara G. “The Consequences of a ‘Limited’ Nuclear War in East and West Germany.” Ambio, Vol. 11, No. 2/3 (1982): 163–173.Google Scholar

Aron, Raymond. “A Half-Century of Limited War?” Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, Vol. 12, No. 4 (1956): 99–104.Google Scholar

Aron, Raymond. “A L’âge atomique peut-on limiter la guerre?” Preuves: Cahiers Mensuels du Congrès pour la Liberté de la Culture, No. 58 (December 1958): 30–39.Google Scholar

Aron, Raymond. “Can War in the Atomic Age Be Limited?” Confluence, Vol. 5 (July 1956): 99–114.Google Scholar

Aron, Raymond. Paix et guerre entre les nations. 4th edn. Paris: Calmann-Lévy, 1962.Google Scholar

Arquilla, John and Nomura, Ryan. “Three Wars of Ideas about the Idea of War.” Comparative Strategy, Vol. 34, No. 2 (March 2015): 185–201.Google Scholar

Arreguin-Toft, Ivan. “How the Weak Win Wars: A Theory of Asymmetric Conflict.” International Security, Vol. 26, No. 1 (summer 2001): 93–128.Google Scholar

Art, Robert J. A Grand Strategy for America (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Art, Robert J. “To What Ends Military Power.” International Security, Vol. 4, No. 3 (spring 1980): 3–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ayson, Robert. Thomas Schelling and the Nuclear Age. London: Frank Cass, 2004.Google Scholar

Baggs, Andrew Rayburn Jr. “Bombing, Bargaining, and Limited War: North Vietnam, 1965–1968.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, 1972.Google Scholar

Bailey, Sydney D. The Korean Armistice. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Bakich, Spencer D. Success and Failure in Limited War: Information and Strategy in the Korean, Vietnam, Persian Gulf, and Iraq Wars. University of Chicago Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bakshi, G.D. Limited Wars in South Asia: Need for an Indian Doctrine. Delhi: Centre for Land Warfare Studies, 2010.Google Scholar

Balaban, Constantin-Gheorghe. “Limited Negotiations but Unlimited War in the Middle East.” Strategic Impact, Vol. 1, No. 1 (2009): 10–16.Google Scholar

Baldor, Lolita C. “US Commander: No Need for Major Change in Afghan War Plan as New General Takes Over.” Military Times (August 8, 2018), www.militarytimes.com/news/your-military/2018/08/08/us-commander-no-need-for-major-change-in-afghan-war-plan-as-new-general-takes-over/Google Scholar

Baldwin, Hanson W. “The Case for Escalation.” New York Times Magazine (February 27, 1966): 22, 79–82.Google Scholar

Baldwin, Hanson W. “Limited War.” The Atlantic Monthly, Vol. 203 (May 1959): 35–43.Google Scholar

Barnett, Frank R., Mott, William C., and Neff, John C., eds. Peace and War in the Modern Age. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books, 1965.Google Scholar

Bartholomees, J. Boone Jr. “The Issue of Attrition.” Parameters, Vol. 40, No. 1 (spring 2010): 5–19.Google Scholar

Bartholomees, J. Boone “Theory of Victory.” Parameters, Vol. 38, No. 2 (summer 2008): 25–36.Google Scholar

Bartholomees, J. Boone ed., US Army War College Guide to National Security Issues. 5th edn. 2 vols. Carlisle, PA: Strategic Studies Institute, June 2012.Google Scholar

Bartles, Charles K. “Getting Gerasimov Right.” Military Review (January–February 2016): 30–38.Google Scholar

Bassford, Christopher. “Clausewitz’s Categories of War and the Suppression of ‘Absolute War.’” Clausewitz.com (January 2017), www.clausewitz.com/bibl/Bassford-ClausewitzsCategoriesOfWar.pdfGoogle Scholar

Baumann, Paul Edward. “Limited War through Airpower and the Political Exploitation of POWs.” MA thesis, Texas Tech University, December 1997.Google Scholar

Baylis, John, Booth, Ken, Garnett, John, and Williams, Phil. Contemporary Strategy: Theories and Policies. New York: Holmes & Meier, 1975.Google Scholar

Beaufre, André. Dissuasion et stratégie. Paris: Armand Colin, 1964.Google Scholar

Beaufre, André. Introduction a la stratégie. Paris: Armand Colin, 1963.Google Scholar

Beaufre, André. An Introduction to Strategy. R. H. Barry, trans. London: Faber and Faber, 1965.Google Scholar

Beaufre, André. Stratégie de l’action. Paris: Armand Colin, 1964.Google Scholar

Beaufre, André. Strategy of Action. R. H. Barry, trans. London: Faber and Faber, 1967.Google Scholar

Beaufre, André. Strategy for Tomorrow. London: Macdonald and Jane’s, 1974.Google Scholar

Beaumont, Roger A. “The Constabulary Function Dilemma.” Military Review, Vol. 79, No. 1 (March–April 1999): 57–60.Google Scholar

Beaumont, Roger A. “The Military Utility of Limited War.” Military Review, Vol. 47, No. 5 (May 1967): 53–57.Google Scholar

Beckett, Ian F. W. Modern Insurgencies: Guerrillas and Their Opponents since 1750. London: Routledge, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beckett, Ian F. W. “Robert Thompson and the British Advisory Mission to South Vietnam, 1961–1965,” Small Wars & Insurgencies, Vol. 8, No. 3 (1997): 41–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beckett, Ian F. W. “Total War.” In Emsley, Clive, et al., eds. War and Peace and Social Change in Twentieth Century Europe. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Beehner, Lionel. “The ‘Coalition of the Willing.’” The Council on Foreign Relations (February 22, 2007), www.cfr.org/backgrounder/coalition-willingGoogle Scholar

Bellamy, Ian. “More Arithmetic of Deterrence: Throw Weight, Radioactivity, and Limited Nuclear War.” Royal United Services Institute, Vol. 14, No. 2 (June 1, 1979): 35–38.Google Scholar

Bem, Allen P. “Defeating Denial: Limited Nuclear War and the Small World Problem.” The Journal of Psychology, Vol. 130, No. 5 (1990): 693–695.Google Scholar

Bender, Michael C. and Radnofsky, Louise. “Trump Says Strikes Aimed at Ending Syria’s Use of Chemical Weapons, Sending Message to Russia and Iran.” The Wall Street Journal (April 13, 2018).Google Scholar

Bennett, Bruce W. Fatality Uncertainties in Limited Nuclear War. Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 1977.Google Scholar

Bennett, Bruce W. “On Preparedness for Limited Nuclear War.” In Larsen and Kartchner, eds. On Limited Nuclear War in the 21st Century, 211–243.Google Scholar

Berdal, Mats. “The ‘New Wars’ Thesis Revisited.” In Strachan, Hew and Scheipers, Sibylle, eds. The Changing Character of War. Oxford University Press, 2011, 108–133.Google Scholar

Bernal, J. D. “Disarmament and Limited Nuclear War.” New World Review, Vol. 26 (January 1958): 30–37.Google Scholar

Bertram, Ian. “The Return of Limited War.” The Strategy Bridge (September 13, 2016), www.thestrategybridge.com/the-bridge/2016/9/13/the-return-of-limited-warGoogle Scholar

Best, Geoffrey. “Restraints on War by Land before 1945.” In Howard, , ed. Restraints on War, 17–38.Google Scholar

Bhonsle, Rahul K. “Kargil 1999: Limited War, Unlimited Consequences.” CLAWS Journal (summer 2009): 73–87.Google Scholar

Biddle, Tami Davis. Strategy and Grand Strategy: What Students and Practitioners Need to Know. Carlisle Barracks, PA: United States Army War College Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Biörklund, E. “Can War Be Limited? (in General or Local Wars).” Air Power, Vol. 6 (summer 1959): 287–293.Google Scholar

Black, Jeremy. Insurgency and Counterinsurgency: A Global History. Lanham, MD: Rowan and Littlefield, 2016.Google Scholar

Black, Jeremy. “The Problems of a Great Power.” The RUSI Journal, Vol. 157, No. 4 (2012): 80–84.Google Scholar

Blamey, Geoffrey. The Causes of War. New York: The Free Press, 1973.Google Scholar

Blight, James G.“‘Limited’ Nuclear War?: The Unmet Psychological Challenge of the American Catholic Bishops.” Science, Technology, & Human Values, Vol. 10, No. 4 (autumn 1985): 3–16.Google Scholar

Boemke, Manfred F., Chickering, Roger, and Förster, Stig, eds. Anticipating Total War: The German and American Experiences, 1871–1914. German Historical Institute. Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Boesche, Roger. “Kautilya’s Arthaśāstra on War and Diplomacy in Ancient India.” The Journal of Military History, Vol. 67, No. 1 (January 2003): 9–37.Google Scholar

Bolger, Daniel. Why We Lost: A General’s Inside Account of the Iraq and Afghanistan Wars. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2014.Google Scholar

Bolton, John. “America’s Unimportant, Unserious Wars.” Small Wars Journal (February 7, 2018), http://smallwarsjournal.com/jrnl/art/america%E2%80%99s-unimportant-unserious-warsGoogle Scholar

Bolton, Kerry R. “Sino–Soviet–US Relations and the 1969 Nuclear Threat.” Foreign Policy Journal (May 17, 2010), www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2010/05/17/sino-soviet-us-relations-and-the-1969-nuclear-threat/3/Google Scholar

Bond, Brian. War and Society in Europe, 1870–1970. Montreal: McGill-Queens University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Boulé II, John R. “Operational Planning and Conflict Termination.” JFQ (Joint Force Quarterly) (autumn–winter, 2001–02): 97–102.Google Scholar

Bracken, Paul. “War Termination.” In Carter, Ashton B., Steinbruner, John D., and Zraket, Charles A., eds. Managing Nuclear Operations. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute, 1987, 197–214.Google Scholar

Braestrup, Peter. “Limited Wars and the Lessons of Lebanon.” The Reporter, Vol. 20 (April 30, 1959): 25–27.Google Scholar

Braim, Paul F. The Will to Win: The Life of General James A. Van Fleet. Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Brands, Hal. “American Grand Strategy: Lessons from the Cold War.” Foreign Policy Research Institute (August 2015), www.fpri.org/article/2015/08/american-grand-strategy-lessons-from-the-cold-war/Google Scholar

Brands, Hal. “Paradoxes of the Gray Zone.” Foreign Policy Research Institute (February 2016), www.fpri.org/article/2016/02/paradoxes-gray-zone/Google Scholar

Brands, Hal. What Good Is Grand Strategy? Power and Purpose in American Statecraft from Harry S. Truman to George W. Bush. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Brannen, Kate. “Obama Warns against Exaggerating the Islamic State Threat.” Foreign Policy (February 1, 2015), http://foreignpolicy.com/2015/02/01/obama-warns-against-exaggerating-the-islamic-state-threat/Google Scholar

Bratton, Patrick C. “When Is Coercion Successful? And Why Can’t We Agree on It?” Naval War College Review, Vol. 58, No. 3 (summer 2005): 99–120.Google Scholar

Brazier-Creagh, K. R. “Limited War.” Brassey’s Annual (1957): 35–45.Google Scholar

Breines, Norman. “The Debate on Limited War, 1957–1959: A Study of Attitudes.” MA thesis, University of Massachusetts-Amherst, 1961.Google Scholar

Brennan, Brian W. “Limited vs. Total War.” Armor, Vol. 111, No. 5 (September–October 2002): 8–11.Google Scholar

Brodie, Bernard. Escalation and the Nuclear Option. Princeton University Press, 1966.Google Scholar

Brodie, Bernard. General André Beaufre on Strategy: A Review of Two Books. Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 1965.Google Scholar

Brodie, Bernard.  “Learning to Fight a Limited War.” In Gerbering, William P. and Brodie, Bernard. The Political Dimension in Strategy: Five Papers. Los Angeles, CA: UCLA Press, 1968, 26–32. Reprinted from Los Angeles Times (December 3, 1967).Google Scholar

Brodie, Bernard. The Meaning of Limited War. US Air Force Project Rand Research Memorandum, RM-2224. Santa Monica CA: RAND, 1958.Google Scholar

Brodie, Bernard. “Politique de dissuasion et guerre limitée.” Politique étrangère, No. 6 (1990): 543–552.Google Scholar

Brodie, Bernard. Review essay, “More about Limited War.” World Politics, Vol. 10, No. 1 (October 1957): 112–122.Google Scholar

Brodie, Bernard. Strategy in the Missile Age. Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 1959.Google Scholar

Brodie, Bernard. Strategy in the Nuclear Age. Princeton University Press, 1965.Google Scholar

Brodie, Bernard. “Unlimited Weapons and Limited War.” The Reporter, Vol. 8 (November 18, 1954): 16–21.Google Scholar

Brodie, Bernard. War and Politics. New York: Macmillan, 1973.Google Scholar

Brom, Shlomo and Elran, Meir, eds. The Second Lebanon War: Strategic Perspectives. Tel Aviv: Institute for National Security Studies, 2007.Google Scholar

Brooks, David C. “Lessons from Limited Wars. Cutting Losses: Ending Limited Interventions.” Parameters, Vol. 43, No. 3 (2013): 99–110.Google Scholar

Brown, Arthur E. “The Strategy of Limited War.” In Lykke, Arthur F. Jr., ed. Military Strategy: Theory and Application (Carlisle Barracks, PA: United States Army War College, 1993), 213–227. Reprinted from Military Strategy, Vol. 3 (August 1973): 25–40.Google Scholar

Brown, Neville. Limited World War? Canberra Papers on Strategy and Defence, No. 32. Canberra: Australian National University, 1984.Google Scholar

Broyles, Arthur A., Wigner, Eugene P., and Drell, Sidney D.. “Civil Defense in Limited War – A Debate.” Physics Today, Vol. 29, No. 44 (1976): 44–57.Google Scholar

Bru, Alain and Margeride, Jean-Baptiste. “Des Armes pour des guerres limitées: Essai de prospective.” Stratégique, Vol. 54, No. 2 (1992), www.institut-strategie.fr/strat_054_BRUMARGERI.htmlGoogle Scholar

Bruce, Robert B. “Tethered Eagle: Lt. General James A. Van Fleet and the Quest for Military Victory in the Korean War.” Army History (winter 2012): 6–29.Google Scholar

Bull, Hedley. “Bureaucracy Keeps Doing Its Thing.” The XX Committee (December 30, 2014), http://20committee.com/2014/12/30/bureaucracy-keeps-doing-its-thing/Google Scholar

Bull, Hedley. “Limited and Nuclear War.” Survival: Global Politics and Strategy, Vol. 5, No. 2 (1963): 54–57.Google Scholar

Burns, Richard Dean. “Regulating Submarine Warfare, 1921–41: A Case Study in Arms Control and Limited War.” Military Affairs, Vol. 35, No. 2 (April 1971): 56–63.Google Scholar

Bush, George and Scowcroft, Brent. A World Transformed. New York: Vintage Books, 1999.Google Scholar

Buzzard, Anthony. “On Limiting Atomic War.” Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, Vol. 13 (June 1957): 216–232.Google Scholar

Buzzard, Anthony, Blackett, P. M. S., Healey, Denis, and Goold-Adams, Richard. On Limiting Atomic War. London: Royal Institute of International Affairs, 1956.Google Scholar

Byman, Daniel. “‘Death Solves All Problems’: The Authoritarian Model of Counterinsurgency.” Journal of Strategic Studies, Vol. 39, No. 1 (2016): 62–93.Google Scholar

Byman, Daniel and Waxman, Matthew. The Dynamics of Coercion: American Foreign Policy and the Limits of Military Might. Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Cable, James. “De la Guerre limitée.” Stratégique, Vol. 54, No.2 (1992), www.institut-strategie.fr/strat_054_Cable.htmlGoogle Scholar

Cable, James. “Limited War.” International Relations, Vol. 11, No.6 (1993): 555–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cable, James. Navies in Violent Peace. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Cagle, Malcolm W. “Sea Power and Limited War.” The United States Naval Institute Proceedings, Vol. 84, No. 7 (July 1958): 23–27.Google Scholar

Calahan, H. A. What Makes a War End? New York: Vanguard Press, 1944.Google Scholar

Callwell, C. E. Small Wars: Their Principles and Practice. 3rd edn. Introduction by Porch, Douglas. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Cannon, Michael W. The Development of the American Theory of Limited War, 1945–1963. MA thesis, School of Advanced Military Studies, United States Army Command and General Staff College, 1989.Google Scholar

Cannon, Michael W. “The Development of the American Theory of Limited War, 1945–1963.” Armed Forces and Society, Vol. 19, No. 1 (fall 1992): 71–104.Google Scholar

Carignan, Jennie. “Victory as a Strategic Objective: An Ambiguous and Counter-Productive Concept for the High Command.” Canadian Military Journal, Vol. 7, No.2 (spring 2017): 5–14.Google Scholar

Carpenter, Ted Galen. “A Really Bad Idea: A ‘Limited’ War with Iran.” The National Interest (April 14, 2015), http://nationalinterest.org/feature/really-bad-idea-limited-war-iran-12623Google Scholar

Carr, Eldon. The Role of the Military in Ending Limited War. USAWC Research Paper. Carlisle Barracks, PA: US Army War College, 1973.Google Scholar

Carroll, Berenice A. “How Wars End: An Analysis of Some Current Hypotheses.” Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 6, No. 4 (1969): 295–321.Google Scholar

Carroll, Berenice A. “War Termination and Conflict Theory: Value Premises, Theories, and Policies.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 392 (November 1970): 14–29.Google Scholar

Casey, Steven. Selling the Korean War: Propaganda, Politics, and Public Opinion in the United States, 1950–1953. Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Cassidy, Robert. M. “Why Great Powers Fight Small Wars Badly.” Military Review, Vol. 82, No. 5 (September–October 2000): 41–53.Google Scholar

Catudal, Honoré M. Soviet Nuclear Strategy from Stalin to Gorbachev: A Revolution in Soviet Military and Political Thinking. Berlin: Arno Spitz, 1988.Google Scholar

Cesa, Marco, ed. Machiavelli on International Relations. Oxford University Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chance Vought Corporation. Limited War. Dallas, TX: Aeronautics and Missile Division, Chance Vought Corp., 1962.Google Scholar

Chandran, D. Suba. “An Inquiry into Limited War – II: Limited War; Unlimited Questions.” Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies, Nuclear – Articles, No. 884 (October 4, 2002), webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:d–1AN81BaQQJ: "http://www.ipcs.org/article/nuclear/an-inquiry-into-limited-war-ii-limited-war-unlimited-questions-884.html%2B%26cd=1%26hl=en%26ct=clnk%26gl=usGoogle Scholar

Chandran, D. Suba. Limited War: Revisiting Kargil in the Indo–Pak Conflict. Safdarjung Enclave, India: India Research Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Chandran, D. Suba. “Limited War with Pakistan: Will It Secure India’s Interests?” ACDIS Occasional Paper. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champagne: Program in Arms Control, Disarmament, and International Security, August 2004.Google Scholar

Changwen, Chai. “The Korean Truce Negotiations.” In Li, Millett, and Yu, trans. and eds. Mao’s Generals Remember Korea, 184–232.Google Scholar

Chatterjee, Partha. “On the Rational Choice Theory of Limited Strategic War.” The Journal of Political Science, Vol. 34, No. 2 (April–June 1973): 157–172.Google Scholar

Check, Terence. “‘Clean’ Bombs and ‘Limited’ War: Edward Teller’s Cold War Arguments.” In Klumpp, James F., ed. Argument in a Time of Change: Definitions, Frameworks, and Critiques. Annandale, VA: National Communications Association, 1998, 304–309.Google Scholar

Cheema, Zafar Iqbal. “The Strategic Context of the Kargil Conflict: A Pakistani Perspective.” In Lavoy, ed. Asymmetric Warfare in South Asia, 41–63.Google Scholar

Chickering, Roger. “Total War: The Use and Abuse of a Concept.” In Boemke, Chickering, and Förster, eds. Anticipating Total War, 13–28.Google Scholar

Chickering, Roger and Förster, Stig. “Introduction.” In Chickering and Förster, eds., The Shadows of Total War, 1–9.Google Scholar

Chickering, Roger and Förster, Stig, eds. Great War, Total War: Combat and Mobilization on the Western Front, 1914–1918 (Cambridge University Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Chickering, Roger and Förster, Stig The Shadows of Total War: Europe, East Asia, and the United States, 1919–1939. German Historical Institute. Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Chickering, Roger, Förster, Stigand Greinder, Bernd, eds. A World at Total War: Global Conflict and the Politics of Destruction, 1937–1945 (Cambridge University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Chu, Shulong, “The PRC Girds for Limited, High-Tech War.” Orbis (spring 1994): 177–191.Google Scholar

Cigar, Norman. “Croatia’s War of Independence: The Parameters of War Termination.” The Journal of Slavic Military Studies, Vol. 10, No. 2 (1997): 34–70.Google Scholar

Cimbala, Stephen J., ed. Strategic War Termination. New York: Praeger, 1986.Google Scholar

Clark, Ian. Limited Nuclear War: Political Theory and Conventions. Princeton University Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Clark, Ian. Waging War: A Philosophical Introduction. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Clarke, Bruce B. G. “Conflict Termination: A Rational Model.” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, Vol. 16, No. 1 (1993): 25–60.Google Scholar

Clarke, Bruce C., Gates, Thomas, and Douglas, James H.. “Limited War: Where Do They Stand?” The Army, Navy, Air Force Register and Defense Times (May 23, 1959): 24–25.Google Scholar

Clarke, Michael. “The Ending of Wars and the Ending of Eras.” The RUSI Journal, Vol. 160, No. 4 (2015): 4–9.Google Scholar

Clausewitz, Carl von. Carl von Clausewitz: Two Letters on Strategy. Paret, Peter and Moran, Dan, trans. and eds. Fort Leavenworth, KS: Combat Studies Institute, US Army Command and General Staff College, 1984.Google Scholar

Clausewitz, Carl von On War. Howard, Michael and Paret, Peter, trans. and eds. Princeton University Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Clausewitz, Carl von Strategie. Marc Guarin, trans., Stoker, Donald and Bassford, Christopher, eds. Fort Bragg, NC: Clausewitz.com, 2019.Google Scholar

Clayton, Anthony. The Wars of French Decolonization. London: Routledge, 1994.Google Scholar

Clayton, David. “British Foreign Economic Policy towards China, 1949–60,” Electronic Journal of International History, Article 6, http://sas-space.sas.ac.uk/3393/1/Journal_of_International_History_2000_n6_Clayton.pdfGoogle Scholar

Clodfelter, Mark. “Air Power and Limited War: An Analysis of the Air Campaigns against North Vietnam as Instruments of National Policy.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, 1987.Google Scholar

Clodfelter, Mark. The Limits of Air Power: The American Bombing of North Vietnam. New York: Free Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Clodfelter, Mark. “Nixon and the Air Weapon.” In Showalter, Dennis E. and Albert, John G., eds. An American Dilemma: Vietnam, 1964–1973. Chicago: Imprint Publications, 1993, 167–186.Google Scholar

Cochrane, Feargal. Ending Wars. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Codevilla, Angelo M. “Make America Victorious Again.” Claremont Review of Books (October 18, 2016), www.claremont.org/crb/basicpage/make-america-victorious-again/Google Scholar

Codevilla, Angelo M. and Seabury, Paul. War: Ends and Means. 2nd edn. Dulles, VA: Potomac Books, 2006.Google Scholar

Cohen, Eliot A. “Constraints on America’s Conduct of Small Wars.” International Security, Vol. 9, No. 2 (1984): 151–181.Google Scholar

Colby, Elbridge. “America Must Prepare for Limited War.” The National Interest (November–December 2015), http://nationalinterest.org/print/feature/america-must-prepare-limited-war-14104Google Scholar

Collins, Bruce. “Defining Victory in Victorian Warfare, 1860–1882.” The Journal of Modern History, Vol. 77, No. 3 (July 2013): 895–929.Google Scholar

Collins, J. Lawton. War in Peacetime: The History and Lessons of Korea. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1969.Google Scholar

Collins, John M. Grand Strategy: Principle and Practices. Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press, 1973.Google Scholar

Communist Government of North Vietnam. Initial Failure of the US “Limited War.” Hanoi: Foreign Language Publishing House, 1967.Google Scholar

Corbett, Julian S. Some Principles of Maritime Strategy. Grove, Eric, introduction and notes. Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press, 1988 [1911].Google Scholar

Cordesmann, Anthony H. Creeping Incrementalism: US Strategy in Iraq and Syria from 2011 to 2015. Washington, DC: CSIS, 2015.Google Scholar

Cordesmann, Anthony H. The “End State” Fallacy: Setting the Wrong Goals for War Fighting. Washington, DC: CSIS, 2016.Google Scholar

Cordesmann, Anthony H. “Losing by ‘Winning’: America’s Wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Syria.” Washington, DC: CSIS, 2018, https://csis-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/publication/180813_Losing_By_Winning.pdf?nyp_L0j0tpQsEquc1mtmn8OpRwQcnYWWGoogle Scholar

Cordesmann, Anthony H. and Wang, Michael. Chinese Military Strategy and Military Modernization in 2015: A Comparative Analysis. Washington, DC: CSIS, 2015.Google Scholar

Corum, James S. “Building the Malayan Army and Police – Britain’s Experience during the Malayan Emergency, 1948–1960.” In Gott, Kendall D., ed. Security Assistance: US and International Historical Perspectives. Leavenworth, KS: Combat Studies Institute Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Coser, Lewis A. “The Termination of Conflict.” The Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 5, No. 4 (December 1961): 347–353.Google Scholar

Coutau-Bégarie, Hervé. “L’Ancien Regime militaire: Un modèle de guerre limitée?” Stratégique, Vol. 54, No. 2 (1992), www.institut-strategie.fr/strat_054_HCBANCIENR.htmlGoogle Scholar

Craig, Gordon A. The Politics of the Prussian Army, 1640–1945. London: Oxford University Press, 1955.Google Scholar

Craig, Gordon A. Review of Nuclear Weapons and Foreign Policy by Henry A. Kissinger and Limited War: The Challenge to American Strategy by Robert Endicott Osgood. Commentary (February 1, 1958), www.commentarymagazine.com/articles/nuclear-weapons-and-foreign-policy-by-henry-a-kissinger-limited-war-the-challenge-to-american-strategy-by-robert-endicott-osgood/Google Scholar

Crane, Conrad C. “Exerting Air Pressure and Globalizing Containment: War Termination in Korea.” In Moten, ed. Between War and Peace, 237–258.Google Scholar

Crane, Conrad C. “From Korea to Kosovo: Matching Expectation with Reality for Modern Airpower in Limited Wars.” In Morton, Jeffrey S., Nation, R. Craig, Forage, Paul, and Bianchi, Stefano, eds. Reflections on the Balkan Wars: Ten Years after the Break-up of Yugoslavia. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004, 211–225.Google Scholar

Crane, Conrad C. “To Avert Impending Disaster: American Military Plans to Use Atomic Weapons during the Korean War.” Journal of Strategic Studies, Vol. 23, No.2 (2000): 72–88.Google Scholar

Cronin, Audrey Kurth. “The ‘War on Terrorism’: What Does It Mean to Win?” Journal of Strategic Studies, Vol. 37, No. 2 (2014): 174–197.Google Scholar

Crozier, Brian. A Theory of Conflict. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1974.Google Scholar

Daalder, Ivo H. and O’Hanlan, Michael E.. Winning Ugly: NATO’s War to Save Kosovo. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Dabezies, Pierre. “La Guerre limitée: Notion fourre-tout, obscure clarte.” Stratégique, Vol. 54, No. 2 (1992), www.institut-strategie.fr/strat_054_Dabezies.htmlGoogle Scholar

Daddis, Gregory. “‘A Better War?’ – The View from the Nixon White House.” Journal of Strategic Studies, Vol. 36, No. 3 (2013): 357–384.Google Scholar

Daddis, Gregory. “Out of Balance: Evaluating American Strategy in Vietnam, 1968–72.” War and Society, Vol. 32, No. 3 (2013): 252–270.Google Scholar

Daddis, Gregory. Westmoreland’s War: Reassessing American Strategy in Vietnam. Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

The Daily Beast (September 11, 2014), www.thedailybeast.com/cheats/2014/09/11/kerry-u-s-is-not-at-war-with-isis.htmlGoogle Scholar

Danchev, Alex and Keohane, Dan, eds. International Perspectives on the Gulf Conflict, 1990–91. Houndsmill, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003.Google Scholar

Darling, Roger. “A New Conceptual Scheme for Analyzing Counterinsurgency.” Military Review, Vol. 54, No. 6 (June 1974): 54–66.Google Scholar

Darling, Roger. “A New Conceptual Scheme for Analyzing Insurgency.” Military Review, Vol. 54, No. 2 (February 1974): 27–38.Google Scholar

Daugherty, William, Levi, Barbara, and Frank, von Hippel. “The Consequences of ‘Limited’ Nuclear Attack on the United States.” International Security, Vol. 10, No. 4 (spring 1986): 3–45.Google Scholar

David, Charles-Philippe and Roche, Jean-Jacques. Théories de la sécurité: Définitions, approches et concepts de la sécurité internationale. Paris: Montchrestien, 2002.Google Scholar

Davis, Anthony. “When Words Hurt: No Limits on a Limited War.” Asiaweek.com, Vol. 26, No. 12 (March 31, 2000), http://edition.cnn.com/ASIANOW/asiaweek/magazine/2000/0331/nat.indiapak.war.htmlGoogle Scholar

Davis, Julie Hirschfeld and Landler, Mark. “Trump Outlines New Afghan War Strategy with Few Details.” The New York Times (August 21, 2017), www.nytimes.com/2017/08/21/world/asia/afghanistan-troops-trump.htmlGoogle Scholar

Davis, Lynn Etheridge. “Limited Nuclear Options: Deterrence and the New American Doctrine: Introduction.” The Adelphi Papers, Vol. 16, No. 121 (winter 1975–76): 1–22.Google Scholar

Davis, W. V. “The Navy in Limited War.” Ordnance, Vol. 42 (March–April 1958): 802–805.Google Scholar

Dawson, Joseph G., III. “The US War with Mexico: The Difficulties of Concluding a Victorious War.” In Moten, ed. Between War and Peace, 85–106.Google Scholar

Deist, Wilhelm. “Foreword.” In Deist, Wilhelm, ed. The German Military in the Age of Total War. Leamington Spa, UK: Berg Publishers, 1985, 5–21.Google Scholar

Deitchman, Seymour J. “Limited War.” Military Review, Vol. 51 (July 1971): 3–16.Google Scholar

Deitchman, Seymour J. Limited War and American Defense Policy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1964.Google Scholar

Dempsey, Martin. “Keynote Speech on Civil–Military Relations at the Center for a New American Security.” (December 1, 2014), www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ORRt-lSRwUGoogle Scholar

Desai, G. “‘Wars May Erupt without Warning.’” The Times of India (January 7, 2000).Google Scholar

Desportes, Vincent. Comprendre la guerre. 2nd edn. Paris: Economica, 2001.Google Scholar

DeWeerd, H. A. “The Triumph of the Limiters: Korea.” Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 1968.Google Scholar

Dickey, Jeffrey V., Everett, Thomas B., Galvach, Zane M., Mesko, Matthew J., and Soltis, Anton V.. “Russian Political Warfare: Origin, Evolution, and Application.” MA thesis, Naval Postgraduate School, 2015.Google Scholar

Diehl, Paul F., ed. War. 6 vols. London: Sage Publications, 2005.Google Scholar

Dinerman, Taylor. “The Limits of Limited War.” Gatestone Institute (October 27, 2011), www.gatestoneinstitute.org/2539/limits-of-limited-warGoogle Scholar

Dolman, Everett Carl. Pure Strategy: Power and Principle in the Space and Information Age. Abingdon, UK: Frank Cass, 2005.Google Scholar

Donner, Michael. Die neutrale Handelsschiffahrt im begrenzten militärischen Konflikt: Eine völkerrechtliche Untersuchung am Beispiel des Konfliktes zwischen Irak und Iran (1980–1988). Kehl am Rhein, Germany: N. P. Engel Verlag, 1993.Google Scholar

Doughart, Jackson. “Neoconservatism in the Political Thought of Albert Camus: A Preliminary Inquiry.” The Journal of Camus Studies (2012): 41–52.Google Scholar

Dougherty, Kevin. The United States Military in Limited War: Case Studies in Success and Failure. Jefferson, NC: McFarland, 2012.Google Scholar

Downs, Chuck. “Limited War: The Initial Failures of Appeasement Policy toward North Korea.” The Heritage Foundation (August 8, 2000), www.heritage.org/asia/report/limited-war-the-initial-failures-appeasement-policy-toward-north-koreaGoogle Scholar

Drell, Sidney D. and von Hippel, Frank. “Limited Nuclear War.” Scientific American, Vol. 235, No. 5 (November 1976): 27–35.Google Scholar

Dubik, James M. “By Any Other Name, War Is Still War.” Army Magazine, Vol. 66, No. 6 (June 2016), www.armymagazine.org/2016/05/13/by-any-other-name-war-is-still-war/Google Scholar

Dueck, Colin and Zakheim, Roger. “Why We Like Ike.” National Review Online (January 13, 2015), www.nationalreview.com/article/411482/why-we-ike-colin-dueck-roger-zakheimGoogle Scholar

Dupuy, T. N. “Can America Fight a Limited Nuclear War?” Survival: Global Politics and Strategy, Vol. 3, No. 5 (1961): 220–234.Google Scholar

Durst, Jay B. “Limited Conventional War – Can It Be Successful?” Military Review, Vol. 50, No. 1 (January 1970): 56–63.Google Scholar

Duyvesten, Isabelle and Worrall, James E.. “Global Strategic Studies: A Manifesto.” Journal of Strategic Studies (2016): 1–11, www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01402390.2016.1269228Google Scholar

Dwyer, Philip G. “Total War or Traditional War.” The International History Review, Vol. 31, No. 1 (March 2009): 72–84.Google Scholar

Earle, Edward Meade, Craig, Gordon, and Gilbert, Felix, eds. Makers of Modern Strategy: Military Thought from Machiavelli to Hitler. Princeton University Press, 1943.Google Scholar

Echevarria, Antulio J., II. Fourth Generation War and Other Myths. Carlisle Barracks, PA: US Army War College Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Echevarria, Antulio J. Operating in the Gray Zone: An Alternative Paradigm for US Military Strategy. Carlisle Barracks, PA: US Army War College Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Echevarria, Antulio J. Reconsidering the American Way of War: US Military Practice from the Revolution to Afghanistan. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Ehrhart, Hans-Georg. “Post-Modern Warfare and the Blurred Boundaries between War and Peace.” Defence & Security Analysis, Vol. 33, No. 3 (2017): 263–275.Google Scholar

Eichenberg, Richard C. “Victory Has Many Friends: US Public Opinion and the Use of Military Force, 1981–2005.” International Security, Vol. 30, No.1 (summer 2005): 140–177.Google Scholar

Elkus, Adam. “Abandon All Hope, Ye Who Enter Here: You Cannot Save the Gray Zone Concept.” War on the Rocks (December 30, 2015), http://warontherocks.com/2015/12/abandon-all-hope-ye-who-enter-here-you-cannot-save-the-gray-zone-concept/Google Scholar

Elkus, Adam. “50 Shades of Gray: Why the Gray Wars Concept Lacks Strategic Sense.” War on the Rocks (December 15, 2015), http://warontherocks.com/2015/12/50-shades-of-gray-why-the-gray-wars-concept-lacks-strategic-sense/Google Scholar

Elkus, Adam. “The Shadow of Limited War.” Red Team Journal (July 15, 2010), http://redteamjournal.com/2010/07/the-shadow-of-limited-war/Google Scholar

Elkus, Adam. “The Strategic and Operational Dynamics of Limited War.” Small Wars Journal (April 17, 2012), http://smallwarsjournal.com/jrnl/art/the-strategic-and-operational-dynamics-of-limited-warGoogle Scholar

Ellis, J. W., Jr. and Greene, T. E., “The Contextual Study: A Structured Approach to the Study of Political and Military Aspects of Limited War.” Operations Research, Vol. 8, No. 5 (September–October 1960): 639–651.Google Scholar

Elowitz, Larry. “Korea and Vietnam: Limited War and the American Political System.” Ph.D. dissertation, The University of Florida, 1972.Google Scholar

Evans, Martin. Algeria: France’s Undeclared War. Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Fabre, Cécile. “War Exit.” Ethics, Vol. 125, No. 3 (April 2015): 631–652.Google Scholar

Fall, Bernard B. “The Theory and Practice of Insurgency and Counter-Insurgency.” Military Review (September–October 2015): 40–48.Google Scholar

Fazal, Tanisha M. and Kreps, Sarah. “The United States’ Perpetual War in Afghanistan: Why Long Wars No Longer Generate a Backlash at Home.” Foreign Affairs (August 20, 2018), www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/north-america/2018–08-20/united-states-perpetual-war-afghanistanGoogle Scholar

Fehling, Gregory E. “America’s First Limited War.” Naval War College Review, Vol. 53, No. 3 (summer 2000): 101–143.Google Scholar

Fenenko, Alexey. “Donbas: A Limited War for a Total Revision of the Cold War Order.” Russia Direct (April 21, 2015), www.russia-direct.org/opinion/donbas-limited-war-total-revision-cold-war-orderGoogle Scholar

Finletter, Thomas K. Power and Policy: US Foreign and Military Policy in the Hydrogen Age. San Diego: Harcourt, Brace and Co., 1954.Google Scholar

Fisher, Thomas L. “Limited War – What Is It?” Air University Quarterly Review, Vol. 9 (winter 1957–58): 127–142.Google Scholar

Flavin, William. “Planning for Conflict Termination and Post-Conflict Success.” Parameters (autumn 2003): 95–112.Google Scholar

Fleck, Janice. Limited War Theory in Vietnam: A Critique according to Clausewitz. Washington, DC: National Defense University, National War College, 1994.Google Scholar

Flynn, Michael T. “How about Winning Our Nation’s Wars instead of Just Participating in Them?” Military Review (March–April 2016): 8–15.Google Scholar

Foot, Rosemary. A Substitute for Victory: The Politics of Peacemaking at the Korean Armistice Talks. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Forsén, Björn and Annette, Forsén. “German Secret Submarine Exports, 1919–35.” In Stoker, Donald J. Jr. and Grant, Jonathan A., eds. Girding for Battle: The Arms Trade in a Global Perspective. Westport, CT: Praeger, 2003, 113–134.Google Scholar

Förster, Stig and Nagler, Jörg. “Introduction.” In Förster and Nagler, eds., On the Road to Total War, 1–25.Google Scholar

Förster, Stig and Nagler, Jörg On the Road to Total War: The American Civil War and the German Wars of Unification, 1861–1871. German Historical Institute. Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Fortna, Virginia Page. “Scraps of Paper? Agreements and the Durability of Peace.” International Organization, No. 57 (spring 2003): 337–372.Google Scholar

Foster, James L. and Brewer, Garry D.. “And the Clocks Were Striking Thirteen: The Termination of War.” Policy Sciences, Vol. 7, No. 2 (June 1976): 225–243.Google Scholar

Fox, Amos C. and Andrew J. Rossow. “Assesing Russian Hybrid Warfare: A Successful Tool for Limited War.” Small Wars Journal (August 8, 2016), https://smallwarsjournal.com/jrnl/art/assessing-russian-hybrid-warfare-a-successful-tool-for-limited-warGoogle Scholar

Fox, William T.R. “The Causes of Peace and Conditions of War.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 392 (November 1970): 1–13.Google Scholar

Fox, William T.R. “Foreword.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 392 (November 1970): viii.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frank, Richard. “Ending the Pacific War: ‘No Alternative to Annihilation.’” In Marston, Daniel, ed. The Pacific War Companion. Oxford, UK: Osprey Publishing, 2005, 227–245.Google Scholar

Franklin, William D. “Clausewitz on Limited War.” Military Review, Vol. 47, No. 6 (1967): 23–29.Google Scholar

Fravel, M. Taylor. “China’s Changing Approach to Military Strategy: The Science of Military Strategy from 2001 to 2013.” In McReynolds, Joe, ed. China’s Evolving Military Strategy. Washington, DC: Brookings, 2016, 40–73.Google Scholar

Freedberg, , Sydney, J. Jr., “No Longer Unthinkable: Should the US Ready for ‘Limited’ Nuclear War?” Breaking Defense (May 30, 2013), http://breakingdefense.com/2013/05/no-longer-unthinkable-should-us-ready-for-limited-nuclear-war/Google Scholar

Freedman, Lawrence. The Evolution of Nuclear Strategy. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1983.Google Scholar

Freedman, Lawrence. “On War and Choice.” The National Interest (May–June 2010): 9–16.Google Scholar

Freedman, Lawrence. Strategy. Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Freedman, Lawrence. “The Theory of Limited War.” In Danchev and Keohane, eds. International Perspectives on the Gulf Conflict, 1990–91, 201–223.Google Scholar

Freedman, Lawrence. “Ukraine and the Art of Limited War.” War on the Rocks (October 2014), http://warontherocks.com/2014/10/ukraine-and-the-art-of-limited-war/#_Google Scholar

Freedman, Lawrence and Karsh, Efraim. The Gulf Conflict, 1990–1991: Diplomacy and War in the New World Order. Princeton University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Freier, Nathan P., et al. Outplayed: Regaining Strategic Initiative in the Gray Zone. Carlisle, PA: Strategic Studies Institute, United States Army War College Press, 2016.Google Scholar

French, David. “Vietnam and the Legacy of Limited War.” The National Review (April 30, 2015), www.nationalreview.com/article/417743/vietnam-and-legacy-limited-war-david-frenchGoogle Scholar

Freudenberg, Dirk. Theorie des Irregulären: Partisanen, Guerillas, und Terroristen im modernen Kleinkrieg. Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 2008.Google Scholar

Frkovich, James. “Limited War and the Ugandan Experience: Implications for African Security.” African Security, Vol. 3, No. 3 (2010): 148–167.Google Scholar

Fuller, William C., Jr. Strategy and Power in Russia, 1600–1914. New York: The Free Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Gabrielson, Iver. “Military Strategy and the Conduct of the 2006 Israel–Hezbollah War.” Comparative Strategy, Vol. 32, No. 5 (2013): 435–442.Google Scholar

Gacek, Christopher M. The Logic of Force: The Dilemma of Limited War in American Foreign Policy. New York: Columbia University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Gaddis, John Lewis. Strategies of Containment. 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Gallois, Pierre. The Balance of Terror: Strategy for the Nuclear Age. Richard Howard, trans. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1961.Google Scholar

Galula, David. Counterinsurgency Warfare: Theory and Practice. Westport, CT: Praeger Security International, 1964, 2006.Google Scholar

Galula, David. Pacification in Algeria, 1956–1958. Santa Monica, CA: Rand, 1963, 2006.Google Scholar

Gannon, Michael V. “Limited vs. Total War.” Commonweal, Vol. 48 (August 22, 1958): 510–513.Google Scholar

Ganor, Boaz. “Defining Terrorism – Is One Man’s Terrorist Another Man’s Freedom Fighter?” International Institute for Counterterrorism (January 1, 2010), www.ict.org.il/Article/1123/Defining-Terrorism-Is-One-Mans-Terrorist-Another-Mans-Freedom-Fighter#gsc.tab=0Google Scholar

Garg, Rahul. “Positive Prospects for Limited War in South Asia.” Journal of Defence Studies, Vol. 5, No. 2 (April 2011): 90–108.Google Scholar

Garnett, John C. “Limited ‘Conventional’ War in the Nuclear Age.” In Howard, Michael, ed. Restraints on War: Studies in the Limitation of Armed Conflict. Oxford University Press, 1979, 79–102.Google Scholar

Garnett, John C. “Limited War.” In Baylis, John, Booth, Ken, Garnett, John, and Williams, Phil. Contemporary Strategy: Theories and Policies. New York: Holmes & Meier, 1982, 114–131.Google Scholar

Garnter, Scott Sigmund. Strategic Assessment in War. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Gat, Azar. A History of Military Thought: From the Enlightenment to the Cold War. Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Gates, Robert M. Duty: Memoirs of a Secretary at War. New York: Knopf, 2014.Google Scholar

Gavin, James M. “Why Limited War?” Ordnance, Vol. 42 (April 1958): 809–813.Google Scholar

Gelpi, Christopher, Feaver, Peter D., and Reifler, Jason. “Success Matters: Casualty Sensitivity and the War in Iraq.” International Security, Vol. 30, No. 3 (winter 2005–06): 7–46.Google Scholar

Géré, François. “Limiter la guerre, Clausewitz, encore.” Stratégique, Vol. 54, No. 2 (1992), www.institut-strategie.fr/strat_054_GR_tdm.htmlGoogle Scholar

Giap, Vo Nguyen and Dung, Van Tien. How We Won the War. Philadelphia: Recon Publishers, 1976.Google Scholar

Gietschier, Steven Philip. “Limited War and the Home Front: Ohio during the Korean War.” Ph.D. dissertation, The Ohio State University, 1977.Google Scholar

Gill, Bates. “Limited Engagement.” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 78, No. 4 (July–August 1999): 65–76.Google Scholar

Gillcrist, Paul Thomas. “Limited War and American Foreign Policy.” MA thesis, Washington, DC: The American University, 1965.Google Scholar

Glavin, Terry. “The American Epoch Is Over. It Ended on Obama’s Watch.” National Post (January 18, 2017), https://nationalpost.com/opinion/the-american-epoch-is-over-it-ended-on-obamas-watchGoogle Scholar

Godwin, Paul H. B. “Chinese Military Strategy Revised: Local and Limited War.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 519 (January 1992): 191–201.Google Scholar

Goemans, H. E. War and Punishment: The Causes of War Termination and the First World War. Princeton University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Gordon, Andrew. “Social Protest in Imperial Japan: The Hibiya Riot of 1905,” The Asia-Pacific Journal, Vol. 12, No. 3 (July 20, 2014): 1–22.Google Scholar

Gordon, Michael R. “Powell Delivers a Resounding No on Using Limited Force in Bosnia.” The New York Times (September 28, 1992), www.nytimes.com/1992/09/28/world/powell-delivers-a-resounding-no-on-using-limited-force-in-bosnia.html?pagewanted=allGoogle Scholar

Gordon, Michael R. “US Outlines Plans on Nuclear-Weapons Use.” The Wall Street Journal (February 2, 2018), www.wsj.com/articles/u-s-outlines-plan-on-nuclear-weapons-use-1517621791Google Scholar

Gordon, Michael R. and Trainor, Bernard E.. Cobra II: The Inside Story of the Invasion and Occupation of Iraq. New York: Vintage, 2007.Google Scholar

Gordon, Michael R. and Trainor, Bernard E. Endgame: The Inside Story of the Struggle for Iraq, from George W. Bush to Barack Obama. New York: Pantheon, 2012.Google Scholar

Gordon, Michael R. and Trainor, Bernard E. The Generals’ War: The Inside Story of the Conflict in the Gulf. New York: Back Bay Books, 1995.Google Scholar

Gorman, Paul F. “Limited War: Korea, 1950.” Paper for Government 285, Harvard University, fall 1953, http://usacac.army.mil/cac2/csi/docs/Gorman/02_Army_1950_72/b_Harvard/02_53_LimitedWar_Nov.pdfGoogle Scholar

Gormley, Robert H. “Limited War and the Striking Fleets.” US Naval Institute Proceedings, Vol. 89, No. 2 (February 1963): 53–59.Google Scholar

Gortzak, Yoav. “Using Indigenous Forces in Counterinsurgency Operations: The French in Algeria, 1954–1962.” Journal of Strategic Studies, Vol. 32, No. 2 (2009): 307–333.Google Scholar

Gouré, Leon. Soviet Limited War Doctrine. Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 1963.Google Scholar

Gourevitch, Philip. “What Obama Didn’t Say.” The New Yorker (September 11, 2014), www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/obama-didnt-sayGoogle Scholar

Gray, Colin S. Categorical Confusion? The Strategic Implications of Recognizing Challenges Either as Irregular or Traditional. Carlisle, PA: Strategic Studies Institute, US Army War College, 2012.Google Scholar

Gray, Colin S. Defining and Achieving Decisive Victory. Carlisle, PA: Strategic Studies Institute, US Army War College, 2002.Google Scholar

Gray, Colin S. and Payne, Keith. “Victory is Possible.” Foreign Policy, No. 39 (summer 1980): 14–27.Google Scholar

Greathouse, Ronald. H. “Profile of a Dilemma: Limited Nuclear War.” The Marine Corps Gazette, Vol. 43 (January 1959): 24–26.Google Scholar

Greentree, Todd R. “A War Examined: Afghanistan.” Parameters, Vol. 43, No. 3 (2013): 87–97.Google Scholar

Greenwalt, Charles. “Limited War Authority Would Tie Hands of Obama’s Successors.” Lancaster Online ( March 1, 2015), https://lancasteronline.com/opinion/columnists/limited-war-authority-would-tie-hands-of-obama-s-successors/article_035c6646-bdfa-11e4-ba5e-831fbfbe29e9.htmlGoogle Scholar

Griffin, Christopher. “From Limited War to Limited Victory: Clausewitz and Allied Strategy in Afghanistan.” Contemporary Security Policy, Vol. 35, No. 3 (2014): 446–467.Google Scholar

Griffith, Michael C. War Termination: Theory, Doctrine, and Practice. Fort Leavenworth, KS: School of Advance Military Studies, 1992.Google Scholar

Griswald, Alex. “NY Times Stealth-Edits Article to Remove Embarrassing Obama Admission.” Mediaite.com (December 29, 2015), www.mediaite.com/online/ny-times-stealth-edits-article-to-remove-embarrassing-obama-admission/Google Scholar

Grygiel, Jacob and Wess Mitchell, A.. “Limited War Is Back.” The National Interest (August 28, 2014): 37–44, http://nationalinterest.org/feature/limited-war-back-11128Google Scholar

Gsponer, André. “The Neutron Bomb and Other Limited Nuclear War Weapons.” Bulletin of Peace Proposals, Vol. 13, No. 3 (1982): 221–225.Google Scholar

Guevara, Che. Guerrilla Warfare. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Gurtov, Mel. “Endless War, Undeclared and Undebated.” LobeLog (December 29, 2015), https://lobelog.com/endless-war-undeclared-and-undebated/Google Scholar

Guttmann, Allen, ed. Korea and the Theory of Limited War. Boston: D. C. Heath, 1967.Google Scholar

Gwynn, Charles W. Imperial Policing. London: Macmillan, 1939.Google Scholar

Haass, Richard N. War of Necessity, War of Choice: A Memoir of Two Iraq Wars. New York: Simon & Schuster, 2009.Google Scholar

Haider, Muhammed Zarrar. “Misconception of Limited War.” Unpublished paper on Academia.edu, undated (downloaded February 2017), www.academia.edu/6948557/Misconception_of_Limited_WarGoogle Scholar

Hall, John. “An Irregular Reconsideration of George Washington and the American Military Tradition.” The Journal of Military History, Vol. 78, No. 3 (2014): 961–993.Google Scholar

Halperin, Morton H. “Limited War: An Essay on the Development of the Theory and an Annotated Bibliography.” Occasional Papers in International Affairs, No. 3 (May 1962): 1–67.Google Scholar

Halperin, Morton H. Limited War in the Nuclear Age. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1963.Google Scholar

Halperin, Morton H. “Nuclear Weapons and Limited War.” The Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 5, No. 2 (June 1961): 146–166.Google Scholar

Halperin, Morton H. “War Termination as a Problem in Civil–Military Relations.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 392, No.1 (1970): 86–95.Google Scholar

Hampton, Ephraim M. “Unlimited Confusion over Limited War.” Air University Quarterly Review, Vol. 9 (spring 1957): 28–47.Google Scholar

Handel, Michael I. Masters of War: Classical Strategic Thought. 3rd edn. London: Frank Cass, 2001.Google Scholar

Handel, Michael I. “The Study of War Termination.” Journal of Strategic Studies, Vol. 1, No. 1 (1978): 51–75.Google Scholar

Harari, Yuval Noah. “Why It’s No Longer Possible for Any Country to Win a War.” Time (June 23, 2017), http://time.com/4826856/russia-trump-north-korea-china-war/Google Scholar

Hashim, Ahmed S. Insurgency and Counterinsurgency in Iraq. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Haslam, Jonathan. Russia’s Cold War: From the October Revolution to the Fall of the Wall. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Hassan, Hassan. “ISIS Is Ready for a Resurgence,” The Atlantic (August 26, 2018), www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2018/08/baghdadi-recording-iraq-syria-terrorism/568471/Google Scholar

Haun, Phil and Colin, Jackson. “Breaker of Armies: Air Power in the Easter Offensive and the Myth of Linebacker I and II in the Vietnam War.” International Security, Vol. 40, No. 3 (winter 2015–16): 139–178.Google Scholar

Hawkins, William R. “Imposing Peace: Total vs. Limited Wars, and the Need to Put Boots on the Ground.” Parameters (summer 2000): 72–82.Google Scholar

Hawkins, William R. “The Man Who Invented Limited War.” MHQ: The Quarterly Journal of Military History, Vol. 4, No. 1 (autumn 1991): 105–109.Google Scholar

Hayden, Bill. “Opening Address.” In Young, ed. Defence and the Media in the Time of Limited War, 5–14.Google Scholar

Hayes, John D. “Peripheral Strategy … Littoral Tactics … Limited War.” The Army Combat Forces Journal, Vol. 5 (September 1954): 36–39.Google Scholar

Healy, Gene. “Goodbye, Obama: The Outgoing President Leaves a Loaded Gun in the Oval Office.” Reason.com (February 2017), http://reason.com/archives/2017/01/10/goodbye-obamaGoogle Scholar

Hedstrom, Jr., Marvin, A. “Limited War in the Precision Engagement Era: The Balance between Dominant Maneuver and Precision Engagement.” MA thesis, School of Advanced Military Studies, 2001.Google Scholar

Heilbrunn, Otto. “When the Counter-Insurgents Cannot Win.” Royal United Services Institution Journal, Vol. 114, No. 653 (March 1969): 55–58.Google Scholar

Hellborn, Rudolph. “Die bonner Theses des begrenzten Krieges.” Deutsche Aussenpolitik (June 1960): 602–617.Google Scholar

Hémez, Rémy. “Operation Sangrais: A Case Study in Limited Military Intervention.” Military Review (November–December 2016): 72–80.Google Scholar

Henderson, Errol A and David Singer, J., “‘New Wars’ and Rumors of ‘New Wars.’” In Diehl, ed., War, Vol. I, 398–425.Google Scholar

Herring, George C. America’s Longest War: The United States and Vietnam, 1950–1975. 3rd edn. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1996.Google Scholar

Herring, George C. “‘In Cold Blood’: LBJ’s Conduct of Limited War in Vietnam.” The Harmon Memorial Lectures, No. 93. Colorado Springs, CO: US Air Force Academy, 1990.Google Scholar

Herring, George C. From Colony to Superpower: US Foreign Relations since 1776 (New York: Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Hershberger, W. D. “EMP and a Limited Nuclear War.” Science, Vol. 213, No. 4510 (August 21, 1981): 816.Google Scholar

Herwig, Holger. “Total Rhetoric, Limited War: Germany’s U-Boat Campaign, 1917–1918.” Journal of Military and Strategic Studies, Vol. 1, No. 1 (1998), http://jmss.journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/jmss/index.php/jmss/article/view/19/18Google Scholar

Hess, Gary R. Presidential Decisions for War: Korea, Vietnam, and the Persian Gulf. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Heuser, Beatrice. The Evolution of Strategy: Thinking about War from Antiquity to the Present. Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Heuser, Beatrice. “Regina Maris and the Command of the Sea: The Sixteenth-Century Origins of Modern Maritime Strategy.” Journal of Strategic Studies (2015): 1–38.Google Scholar

Higgins, Trumbull. Korea and the Fall of MacArthur: A Précis in Limited War. New York: Oxford University Press, 1960.Google Scholar

Highland, , Curteis, H. M.. “The Doctrine of Limited Liability.” Royal United Services Institution, Vol. 83, No. 532 (1938): 695–701.Google Scholar

Hildreth, Charles H. USAF Logistics Preparations for Limited War, 1958–1961. Washington, DC: USAF Historical Division Liaison Office, October 1962.Google Scholar

Hilsman, Roger. From Nuclear Military Strategy to a World Without War: A History and a Proposal. Westport, CT: Praeger, 1999.Google Scholar

Hirano, Ryuji. “The First Sino–Japanese and the Russo–Japanese War from the Viewpoint of a ‘Maritime Limited War’: From the Perspective of Julian Corbett’s Strategic Theory.” Briefing Memorandum. National Institute for Defense Studies (NIDS) News. Japan Ministry of Defense (June 12, 2015).Google Scholar

Hoag, Malcolm W. On Local War Doctrine. Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 1961.Google Scholar

Hoffman, Frank G. Conflict in the 21st Century: The Rise of Hybrid Wars. Arlington, VA: Potomac Institute for Policy Studies, 2007.Google Scholar

Hoffman, Frank G. “The Contemporary Spectrum of Conflict: Protracted, Gray Zone, Ambiguous, and Hybrid Modes of Warfare.” The Heritage Foundation: 2016 Index of US Military Strength, 25–36, http://index.heritage.org/military/2016/essays/contemporary-spectrum-of-conflict/Google Scholar

Hoffman, Frank G. Decisive Force – The New American Way of War? National Security Decision-Making paper. Newport, RI: US Naval War College, March 1994.Google Scholar

Hoffman, Frank G. “Further Thoughts on Hybrid Threats.” Small Wars Journal (March 2, 2009), http://smallwarsjournal.com/jrnl/art/further-thoughts-on-hybrid-threatsGoogle Scholar

Hoffman, Frank G. “Hybrid vs. Compound War.” Armed Forces Journal (October 1, 2009), http://armedforcesjournal.com/hybrid-vs-compound-war/Google Scholar

Hoffman, Frank G. “On Not-So-New Warfare: Political Warfare vs. Hybrid Threats.” War on the Rocks (July 28, 2014), https://warontherocks.com/2014/07/on-not-so-new-warfare-political-warfare-vs-hybrid-threats/Google Scholar

Holden, Reid, Brian. “The Cold War US Army: Building Deterrence for Limited War.” Cold War History, Vol. 10, No. 3 (August 2010): 464–465.Google Scholar

Holden, Reid, Brian “Michael Howard and Evolving Ideas about Strategy.” Annual Liddell Hart Lecture. London, King’s College (November 27, 2012).Google Scholar

Holdorf, Polly M. “Limited Nuclear War in the 21st Century.” In Jansson, Mark, ed. A Collection of Papers from the 2010 Nuclear Scholars Initiative. Washington, DC: CSIS, 2010), 137–149, http://csis.org/files/publication/110916_Holdorf.pdfGoogle Scholar

Holmes, Terence M. “The Clausewitzian Fallacy of Absolute War.” Journal of Strategic Studies (April 2017), www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01402390.2017.1307742Google Scholar

Holmqvist, Caroline. Policing Wars: On Military Intervention in the Twenty-First Century. Houndsmill, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.Google Scholar

Holsti, Kalevi J. The State, War, and the State of War. Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Homan, C. “Nucleaire Strategie.” In Teitler, Bosch, and Klinkert, eds. Militaire Strategie, 231–260.Google Scholar

Honig, Jan Willem. “Problems of Text and Translation.” In Strachan, Hew and Herberg-Rothe, Andreas, eds. Clausewitz in the Twenty-First Century. Oxford University Press, 2007, 57–73.Google Scholar

Horne, Alistair. A Savage War of Peace: Algeria, 1954–1962. New York: New York Review of Books, 2006.Google Scholar

Horne, John. “Introduction: Mobilizing for ‘Total War,’ 1914–1918.” In Horne, John, ed. State, Society, and Mobilization in Europe during the First World War. Cambridge University Press, 1997, 1–17.Google Scholar

Howard, Michael. “The Classical Strategists.” The Adelphi Papers, Vol. 9, No. 54 (1969): 18–32.Google Scholar

Howard, Michael. “Constraints on War.” In Howard, Michael, Andreopolous, George J., and Shulman, Mark R., eds. The Laws of War: Constraints on Warfare in the Western World. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1994, 1–11.Google Scholar

Howard, Michael, Andreopolous, George J., and Shulman, Mark R. “The Forgotten Dimension of Strategy.” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 57, No. 5 (1979): 975–986.Google Scholar

Howard, Michael, Andreopolous, George J., and Shulman, Mark R. ed. Restraints on War: Studies in the Limitation of Armed Conflict. Oxford University Press, 1979.Google Scholar

Howard, Michael, Andreopolous, George J., and Shulman, Mark R. “Temperamenta Belli: Can War be Controlled?” In Howard, ed. Restraints on War, 1–16.Google Scholar

Howard, Michael, Andreopolous, George J., and Shulman, Mark R. “The Transformation of Strategy.” The RUSI Journal, Vol. 156, No. 4 (2011): 12–16.Google Scholar

Hsieh, Wayne Wei-Siang. “Total War and the American Civil War Reconsidered: The End of an Outdated ‘Master Narrative.’” The Journal of the Civil War Era, Vol. 1, No. 3 (September 2011): 394–408.Google Scholar

Hua, Hongxun. “China’s Strategic Missile Programs: Limited Aims, Not ‘Limited Deterrence.’” The Nonproliferation Review, Vol. 5, No. 2 (1998): 60–68.Google Scholar

Hume, Robert S. and Freier, Nathan P.. “Confronting Conflict in the ‘Gray Zone.’” Breaking Defense (June 23, 2016), http://breakingdefense.com/2016/06/confronting-conflict-in-the-gray-zone/Google Scholar

Hunt, Michael C. “Beijing and the Korean Crisis, June 1950–June 1951,” Political Science Quarterly, Vol. 107, No. 3 (autumn, 1992): 453–478.Google Scholar

Ignatius, David. “The Problem with America’s Limited Wars.” Washington Post (October 9, 2014), www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/david-ignatius-reality-check-on-limited-war/2014/10/09/19c8c95e-4ff2-11e4-babe-e91da079cb8a_story.htmlGoogle Scholar

Iklé, , Charles, Fred. Every War Must End. New York: Columbia University Press, 1971.Google Scholar

Iklé, Fred How Nations Negotiate. New York: Harper & Row, 1964, 1987.Google Scholar

Talbot, Imlay. Review essay, “Total War.” Journal of Strategic Studies, Vol. 30, No. 3 (2007): 547–570.Google Scholar

Ingram, Haroro J. “Three Lessons from the Modern Era of Small Wars.” The International Relations and Security Network (May 26, 2014), www.isn.ethz.ch/Digital-Library/Articles/Detail/?id=180191Google Scholar

Ingram, Haroro J. and Whiteside, Craig. “Outshouting the Flea: Islamic State and Modern Asymmetric Strategic Communications.” In Dew, Andrea, Genest, Marc, and Payne, S. C. M., eds. From Quills to Tweets: How America Communicates War and Revolution. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2019.Google Scholar

Interavia Study Group. “‘Little Wars’ Need Big Battalions.” Interavia, Vol. 11, No. 10 (October 1956): 773–776.Google Scholar

Ivey, Ramon A. “Limited War, National Will, and the All Volunteer Army.” Study Project. Carlisle Barracks, PA: US Army War College, 1988.Google Scholar

Jack, Tan Kwoh. “The Korean War June–October 1950: Inchon and Stalin in the ‘Trigger vs. Justification’ Debate.” Working Paper No. 105. Singapore Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (January 2006).Google Scholar

Jackson, Ashley. “The Taliban’s Fight for Hearts and Minds.” Foreign Policy (September 12, 2018), https://foreignpolicy.com/2018/09/12/the-talibans-fight-for-hearts-and-minds-aghanistan/Google Scholar

Jackson, Colin F. “Lost Chance or Lost Horizon? Strategic Opportunity and Escalation Risk in the Korean War, April–July 1951.” Journal of Strategic Studies, Vol. 33, No. 2 (2010): 255–289.Google Scholar

James, , Clayton, D., with Sharp Wells, Anne. Refighting the Last War: Command and Crisis in Korea. New York: Free Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Janda, Lance. “Shutting the Gates of Mercy: The American Origins of Total War, 1860–1880.” Journal of Military History, Vol. 59, No. 1 (January 1995): 7–26.Google Scholar

Janecek, Frank P. “In Limited War – Victory before the Culminating Point.” Joint Maritime Operations paper. Newport, RI: US Naval War College, May 1995.Google Scholar

Jarausch, Konrad H. “The Illusion of Limited War: Chancellor Bethmann Hollweg’s Calculated Risk, July 1914.” Central European History, Vol. 2, No. 1 (March 1969): 48–76.Google Scholar

Jian, Chen. China’s Road to the Korean War: The Making of the Sino-American Confrontation. New York: Columbia University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Jocelyn, Thomas. “Losing a War.” The Weekly Standard (August 27, 2018), www.weeklystandard.com/thomas-joscelyn/losing-a-warGoogle Scholar

Johnson, Dominic D. P. Failing to Win: Perceptions of Victory and Defeat in International Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Johnson, James T. Ideology, Reason, and the Limitation of War: Religious and Secular Concepts, 1200–1740. Princeton University Press, 1975.Google Scholar

Johnson, James T. Just War Tradition and the Restraint of War: A Moral and Historical Inquiry. Princeton University Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Johnson, James T. “The Meaning of Non-Combatant Immunity in the Just War/Limited War Tradition.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion, Vol. 39, No.2 (June 1971): 151–170.Google Scholar

Johnson, Robert. “Hybrid War and Its Countermeasures: A Critique of the Literature.” Small Wars & Insurgencies, Vol. 29, No. 1 (2018): 141–163.Google Scholar

Johnson, Robert B. “Tactical Warfare and the Limited War Dilemma.” TEMPO Review Paper. Santa Barbara, CA: General Electric Company, 1961.Google Scholar

Johnston, Herbert. “Limited War.” Review of Politics, Vol. 27, No. 2 (April 1965): 246–247.Google Scholar

Johnston, Patrick B. “Does Decapitation Work? Assessing the Effectiveness of Leadership Targeting in Counterinsurgency Campaigns.” International Security. Vol. 36, No. 4 (spring 2012): 47–79.Google Scholar

Johnston, Patrick B. and Urlacher, Brian R.. “Explaining the Duration of Counterinsurgency Campaigns,” (February 25, 2012), http://patrickjohnston.info/materials/duration.pdfGoogle Scholar

Jomini, Antoine-Henri. The Art of War. G. H. Mendell and W. P. Craighill, trans. Westport, CT: Greenwood, 1971 [1862].Google Scholar

Jones, Christopher. “Just and Limited Wars: Restraints on the Use of the Soviet Armed Forces.” World Politics, Vol.28, No. 1 (October 1975): 44–68.Google Scholar

Jones, Terry. “Why Grammar Is the First Casualty of War.” The Daily Telegraph (December 1, 2001), www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1364012/Why-grammar-is-the-first-casualty-of-war.htmlGoogle Scholar

Jordan, Jenna. “Attacking the Leader, Missing the Mark: Why Terrorist Groups Survive Decapitation Strikes.” International Security, Vol. 38, No. 4 (spring 2014): 7–38.Google Scholar

Josephson, Matthew. “The Fantasy of Limited War.” The Nation (August 31, 1957): 89–91.Google Scholar

Joshi, Shashank, “India’s Military Instrument: A Doctrine Stillborn.” Journal of Strategic Studies, Vol. 36, No. 4 (2013): 512–540.Google Scholar

Joy, C. Turner. How Communists Negotiate. New York: Macmillan, 2013 [1955].Google Scholar

Kagan, Donald, Cohen, Eliot, Doran, Charles F., and Mandelbaum, Michael. “Is Major War Obsolete? An Exchange.” Survival: Global Politics and Strategy, Vol. 41, No. 2 (1999): 139–152.Google Scholar

Kahn, Herman. “Issues of Thermonuclear War Termination.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 392 (November 1970): 133–172.Google Scholar

Kahn, Herman. On Escalation. New York: Praeger, 1967.Google Scholar

Kalamanowitz, Pablo. “Regular War, Jus in Bello, and the Ideal of Limited War.” Paper prepared for the ECPR General Conference (2015).Google Scholar

Kaldor, Mary. “In Defence of New Wars.” Stability, Vol. 2, No. 1 (2013): 1–16.Google Scholar

Kaldor, Mary. New and Old Wars: Organised Violence in a Global Era. 3rd edn. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Kaplan, Morton A. The Strategy of Limited Retaliation. Policy Memorandum No. 19. Princeton, NJ: Center of International Studies, 1959.Google Scholar

“Kargil, a ‘test for limited n-war.’” The Hindu (August 20, 2003), www.thehindu.com/2003/08/20/stories/2003082006001200.htmGoogle Scholar

Karon, Tony. “Obama Promises a Long and Limited War on Islamic State.” Al Jazeera America (September 11, 2014), http://america.aljazeera.com/articles/2014/9/10/islamic-state-obama.htmlGoogle Scholar

Kartchner, Kerry M. “Escalation to Limited Nuclear War in the 21st Century.” In Larsen and Kartchner, eds. On Limited Nuclear War in the 21st Century, 144–171.Google Scholar

Kaufmann, William W. Policy Objectives and Military Action in the Korean War. Santa Monica, CA; RAND, 1956.Google Scholar

Kawamura, Kouki. “Briefing Memo: Limited War and Escalation.” The National Institute for Defense Studies News (April 2016), www.nids.mod.go.jp/english/publication/briefing/pdf/2016/briefing_e201604Google Scholar

Kecskemeti, Paul. “Political Rationality in Ending War.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 392 (November 1970): 105–115.Google Scholar

Kecskemeti, Paul. Strategic Surrender: The Politics of Victory and Defeat. Stanford University Press, 1958.Google Scholar

Kempf, Olivier. “L’Indirection de la guerre ou le retour de la guerre limitée.” Institut français des relations internationals (IFRI), No. 4 (winter 2015): 157–169.Google Scholar

Kerin, James R. Jr. Remembering Limited War: Reflections on the Korean War in Selected American Novels. Carlisle Barracks, PA: US Army War College, 2000.Google Scholar

Khan, Feroz Hassan, Peter, R. Lavoy, , and Clary, Christopher. “Pakistan’s Motivations and Calculations for the Kargil Conflict.” In Lavoy, ed. Asymmetric Warfare in South Asia, 64–91.Google Scholar

Khan, Khurshid. “Limited War under the Nuclear Umbrella and Its Implications for South Asia,” (2005), http://sacw.pagesperso-orange.fr/saan/2005/khurshidkhan.pdfGoogle Scholar

Kiesling, Eugenia C. “‘Total War, Total Nonsense’ or ‘The Military Historian’s Fetish.’” In Neiberg, Michael S., ed. Arms and the Man: Military History Essays in Honor of Dennis Showalter. Leiden: Brill, 2011, 223–227.Google Scholar

Kilgour, D. Marc and Zagare, Frank C.. “Explaining Limited Conflicts.” Conflict Management and Peace Science, Vol. 24, No. 1 (2007): 65–82.Google Scholar

Kim, Arm-San. “A Note on Sunzi’s Art of War and Limited War: A Modern Interpretation.” Korean Journal of Defense Analysis, Vol.6, No. 1 (1994): 245–257.Google Scholar

Kim, Taewoo. “Limited War, Unlimited Targets: US Air Force Bombing of North Korea during the Korean War, 1950–1953.” Critical Asian Studies, Vol. 44, No. 3 (2012): 467–492.Google Scholar

King, Jr., James, E. “Deterrence and Limited War.” Army, Vol. 8 (August 1957): 21–26.Google Scholar

King, , Jr., James “Nuclear Plenty and Limited War.” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 35, No. 2 (January 1957): 238–256.Google Scholar

Kissinger, Henry A. “Controls, Inspection, and Limited War.” The Reporter, Vol. 16, No. 12 (June 13, 1957): 14–19.Google Scholar

Kissinger, Henry A. Diplomacy. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1994.Google Scholar

Kissinger, Henry A. “Limited War: Conventional or Nuclear?” Survival: Global Politics and Strategy, Vol. 3, No. 1 (1961): 2–11.Google Scholar

Kissinger, Henry A.  “Military Policy and the Defense of the ‘Grey Areas.’” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 33, No. 3 (April 1958): 416–428.Google Scholar

Kissinger, Henry A. The Necessity for Choice: Prospects of American Foreign Policy. New York: Harper, 1960.Google Scholar

Kissinger, Henry A. “Nuclear Testing and the Problem of Peace.” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 37, No. 1 (October 1958): 1–18.Google Scholar

Kissinger, Henry A. Nuclear Weapons and Foreign Policy. New York: Harper & Brothers, 1957.Google Scholar

Kitson, Frank. Low-Intensity Operations: Subversion, Insurgency, Peace-Keeping. Harrisburg, PA: Stackpole Books, 1971.Google Scholar

Knorr, Klaus. “Limited Strategic War.” In Knorr and Read, eds. Limited Strategic War, 3–31.Google Scholar

Knorr, Klaus and Read, Thornton, eds. Limited Strategic War. New York: Praeger, 1962.Google Scholar

Kolb, Avery E. Emergency Resource Management: Limited War. Washington, DC: Industrial College of the Armed Forces of the United States, 1969.Google Scholar

Kolodziej, Edward A. Review of Limited War Revisited by Robert E. Osgood. The Journal of Politics, Vol. 43, No. 1 ( February 1981): 247–48.Google Scholar

Kolton, Randy J. Isolating the Theater of War: Operational Implications of Border Sanctuaries in Limited War. Fort Leavenworth, KS: US Army Command and Staff College, 1990.Google Scholar

Kondratov, T. “What Is ‘Limited War’?” Soviet Military Review, No. 1 (August 1973): 48–49.Google Scholar

Krebs, Gerhard. “Super Sunrise? Japanese–United States Peace Feelers in Switzerland, 1945.” The Journal of Military History, Vol. 69, No. 4 (October 2005): 1081–1120.Google Scholar

Krepon, Michael. “Limited War, Escalation Control, and the Nuclear Option in South Asia.” In Michael Krepon, Rodney W. Jones, and Ziad Haider, eds., Escalation Control and the Nuclear Option in South Asia. Washington, DC: Stimson Center, 149–166, www.stimson.org/sites/default/files/file…/Escalation%20Control%20FINAL_0.pdfGoogle Scholar

Kriner, Douglas and Shen, Francis. “Limited War and American Political Engagement.” Journal of Politics, Vol. 71, No. 4 (October 2009): 1514–1529.Google Scholar

Krizanovic, Gary. Operational Art in Limited War Termination: The Bridge between the Strategic and the Operational Levels of War. Joint Maritime Operations paper. Newport, RI: US Naval War College, 1994.Google Scholar

Kroenig, Matthew. “The Case for US Tactical Nukes.” The Wall Street Journal (January 24, 2018), www.wsj.com/articles/the-case-for-tactical-u-s-nukes-1516836395Google Scholar

Kuklick, Bruce. Blind Oracles: Intellectuals and War from Kennan to Kissinger. Princeton University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Ladwig, Walter C., III. “A Cold Start for Hot Wars? The Indian Army’s New Limited War Doctrine.” International Security, Vol. 32, No. 3 (winter 2007–08): 158–190.Google Scholar

Lai, , Yu-jen, Nathan. “United States Policy and the Diplomacy of Limited War in Korea, 1950–1951.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, 1974.Google Scholar

Nicholas, Lambert. Review essay, “False Prophet?: The Maritime Theory of Julian Corbett and Professional Military Education.” The Journal of Military History, Vol. 77, No. 3 (July 2013): 1055–1078.Google Scholar

Landler, Mark. “Obama, in Speech on ISIS, Promises Sustained Effort to Rout Militants.” The New York Times (September 10, 2014), www.nytimes.com/2014/09/11/world/middleeast/obama-speech-isis.htmlGoogle Scholar

Langbaum, Robert. “Democratic Strategy to Halt the Soviet Threat: ‘Limited War’ as the Path to Peace.” Commentary (July 1, 1951), www.commentarymagazine.com/articles/democratic-strategy-to-halt-the-soviet-threat-limited-war-as-the-path-to-peace/Google Scholar

Lange, Sven. Hans Delbrück und der “Strategiestreit”: Kriegführung und Kriegsgeschichte in der Kontroverse, 1879–1914. Freiburg im Breisgau: Rombach, 1995.Google Scholar

Larison, Daniel. “Obama’s ‘Limited’ Perpetual War.” The American Conservative (February 12, 2015), www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/obamas-limited-perpetual-war/Google Scholar

Larison, Daniel “Why ‘Limited’ Wars Fail.” The American Conservative (October 10, 2014), www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/why-limited-wars-fail/Google Scholar

Larsen, Jeffrey A. “Limited War and the Advent of Nuclear Weapons.” In Larsen and Kartchner, eds. On Limited Nuclear War in the 21st Century, 3–20.Google Scholar

Larsen, Jeffrey A. and Kartchner, Kerry M., eds. On Limited Nuclear War in the 21st Century. Stanford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Larson, Robert. “B. H. Liddell Hart: Apostle of Limited War.” Military Affairs, Vol. 44, No. 2 (April 1980).Google Scholar

Lavoy, Peter R., ed. Asymmetric Warfare in South Asia: The Causes and Consequences of the Kargil Conflict. Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Lawrence, T. E. “The 27 Articles of T. E. Lawrence.” The Arab Bulletin (August 20, 1917), https://wwi.lib.byu.edu/index.php/The_27_Articles_of_T.E._LawrenceGoogle Scholar

Layton, Peter. “The Idea of Grand Strategy.” The RUSI Journal, Vol. 157, No. 4 (2012): 56–61.Google Scholar

LeBow, Richard Ned. “Thomas Schelling and Strategic Bargaining.” International Journal, Vol. 51, No. 3 (summer 1996): 555–576.Google Scholar

LeBow, Richard “Reason Divorced from Reality: Thomas Schelling and Strategic Bargaining.” International Politics, Vol. 43 (2006): 429–452.Google Scholar

Le Cheminant, P. de L. “Tactical Deterrence or Limited War?” Brassey’s Annual (1961): 112–121.Google Scholar

Lee, Bradford A. “Strategic Interaction: Theory and History for Practitioners.” In Mahnken, Thomas, ed. Competitive Strategies for the 21st Century. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, 2012, 28–46.Google Scholar

Lee, Bradford A. “Winning the War but Losing the Peace? The United States and the Strategic Issues of War Termination.” In Lee, Bradford A. and Walling, Karl F. eds. Strategic Logic and Political Rationality: Essays in Honor of Michael I. Handel. London: Frank Cass, 2003, 248–273.Google Scholar

Lee, Steven. “Morality, the SDI, and Limited Nuclear War.” Philosophy and Public Affairs, Vol. 17, No. 1 (winter 1988): 15–43.Google Scholar

Lee, Wayne E. “Plattsburgh 1814: Warring for Bargaining Chips.” In Moten, ed. Between War and Peace, 43–63.Google Scholar

LeGro, William E. “The Why and How of Limited War.” Military Review, Vol. 50, No. 7 (July 1970): 32–39.Google Scholar

Lemmer, George F. “USAF Manpower in Limited War, 1964–1967.” USAF Historical Division Liaison Office, 1968.Google Scholar

Lepgold, Joseph and Sterling, Brent L.. “When Do States Fight Limited Wars? Political Risk, Policy Risk, and Policy Choice.” Security Studies, Vol. 9, No. 4 (2000): 127–166.Google Scholar

Lesh, Bruce A. “Limited War or Rollback of Communism?: Truman, MacArthur, and the Korean Conflict.” OAH Magazine of History, Vol. 22, No. 4 (October 2008): 47–53.Google Scholar

Levinson, Irving W. “A New Paradigm for an Old Conflict: The Mexico–United States War.” The Journal of Military History, Vol. 73, No. 2 (April 2009): 393–416.Google Scholar

Lévy, Bernard-Henri. “Thinking the Unthinkable: This Is War.” Steven B. Kennedy, trans. Globe and Mail (November 16, 2015), www.theglobeandmail.com/globe-debate/thinking-the-unthinkable-this-is-war/article27284617/Google Scholar

Levy, Jack S. “Big Wars, Little Wars, and Theory Construction.” International Relations, Vol. 16, No. 3 (1990): 215–224.Google Scholar

Lewis, Adrian. The American Culture of War: The History of US Military Force from World War II to Operation Iraqi Freedom. New York: Routledge, 2007.Google Scholar

Lewy, Guenter. America in Vietnam. Oxford University Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Li, Xiaobing. China’s Battle for Korea: The 1951 Spring Offensive. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Li, Xiaobing, Millett, Allan R., and Yu, Bin, trans. and eds. Mao’s Generals Remember Korea. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas, 2001.Google Scholar

Liddell Hart, B. H. Defence of the West. New York: Morrow & Co., 1950.Google Scholar

Liddell Hart, B. H. The Revolution in Warfare. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1947.Google Scholar

Liddell Hart, B. H. Strategy. 2nd edn. New York: Meridian, 1991 [1967].Google Scholar

Liddell Hart, B. H. “War, Limited.” Harper’s, Vol. 192, No. 1150 (March 1946): 193–203.Google Scholar

“Limited War: Prospects and Possibilities.” Army Information Digest, Vol. 13 (June 1958): 6–20.Google Scholar

Loan, Eugene Van. “Limited to Defeat.” Claremont Review of Books Digital (March 1, 2016), www.claremont.org/crb/basicpage/limited-to-defeat/Google Scholar

Lockwood, Jonathan Samuel. The Soviet View of US Strategic Doctrine: Implications for Decision Making. Foreword by Gouré, Leon. New Brunswick: Transaction Books, 1983.Google Scholar

Lockyer, Adam. “How Democracies Exit Small Wars: The Role of Opposition Parties in War Termination.” The Australian Journal of International Affairs, Vol. 66, No. 3 (2012): 381–396.Google Scholar

Lofgren, Charles A. “How New Is Limited War?” Military Review (July 1967): 16–23.Google Scholar

Lohaus, Phillip. “A Missing Shade of Gray: Political Will and Waging Something Short of War.” War on the Rocks (January 11, 2017), https://warontherocks.com/2017/01/a-missing-shade-of-gray-political-will-and-waging-something-short-of-war/Google Scholar

Long, Austin. On “Other War”: Lessons from Five Decades of RAND Counterinsurgency Research. Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 2006.Google Scholar

Lucas, George R. “Postmodern War.” Journal of Military Ethics, Vol. 9, No. 4 (2010): 289–298.Google Scholar

Luck, Edward C. and Albert, Stuart. “Introduction.” In Albert, Stuart and Luck, Edward C., eds. On the Endings of Wars. Port Washington, NY: Kennikat Press, 1980, 3–6.Google Scholar

Luttwak, Edward N. On the Meaning of Victory: Essays on Strategy. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1986.Google Scholar

Luttwak, Edward N. Strategy: The Logic of War and Peace. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard, 1987.Google Scholar

Lyall, Jason. “Do Democracies Make Inferior Counterinsurgents? Reassessing Democracy’s Impact on War Outcomes and Duration.” International Organization, Vol. 64, No. 1 (2010): 167–192.Google Scholar

Lybrand, William A., ed. Proceedings of the Symposium: The US Army’s Limited-War Mission and Social Science Research, March 26, 27, 28, 1962. Washington, DC: Special Operations Research Office, American University, 1962.Google Scholar

Lynn, John A. “Patterns of Insurgency and Counterinsurgency.” Military Review (July–August 2005): 22–27.Google Scholar

MacArthur, Douglas. “Farewell Address to Congress, April 19, 1951,” www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/douglasmacarthurfarewelladdress.htmGoogle Scholar

MacArthur, Douglas. Reminiscences. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1964.Google Scholar

Machiavelli, Niccolò. Discourses on Livy. Ninnian Hill Thomson, trans. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications, 2007.Google Scholar

Mack, Andrew. “Why Big Nations Lose Small Wars: The Politics of Asymmetric Conflict.” World Politics, Vol. 27, No. 2 (1975): 175–200.Google Scholar

Mahan, , Thayer, Alfred. Naval Strategy Compared and Contrasted with the Principles and Practice of Military Operations on Land. Boston: Little, Brown, 1911.Google Scholar

Mahnken, Thomas C. “Future Scenarios of Limited Nuclear Conflict.” In Larsen and Kartchner, eds. On Limited Nuclear War in the 21st Century, 129–143.Google Scholar

Malkasian, Carter. “Toward a Better Understanding of Attrition: The Korean and Vietnam Wars.” The Journal of Military History, Vol. 68, No. 3 (July 2004): 911–942.Google Scholar

Mallison, Jr., Thomas, W.. Studies in the Law of Naval Warfare: Submarines in General and Limited Wars. International Law Studies, 1966, Vol. LVIII. Washington, DC: USGPO, 1968.Google Scholar

Mandelbaum, Michael. “Is Major War Obsolete?” Survival: Global Politics and Strategy, Vol. 40, No. 4 (1998): 20–38.Google Scholar

Manea, Octavian. “NATO in the Age of Limited Wars.” Defence Matters (April 4, 2016), http://defencematters.org/news/nato-in-the-age-of-limited-wars/343/Google Scholar

Tse-Tung, Mao. On Guerrilla Warfare. Samuel B. Griffith II, trans. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Tse-Tung, Mao “The Three Stages of Protracted War.” In Selected Military Writings. Peking: Foreign Language Press, 1967, 210–219.Google Scholar

Marighella, Carlos. “The Minimanual of the Urban Guerrilla.” In Sarkesian, Sam. C., ed. Revolutionary Guerrilla Warfare. Chicago: Precedent Publishing, 1975, 507–530.Google Scholar

Marolda, Edward J. “The Influence of Burke’s Boys on Limited War.” US Naval Institute Proceedings, Vol. 107, No. 942 (August 1981): 36–41.Google Scholar

Marquis, Jefferson P. “The ‘Other War’: An Intellectual History of American Nation-Building in South Vietnam, 1954–1975.” Ph.D. dissertation, Ohio State University, 1997.Google Scholar

Martel, William C. Victory in War: Foundations of Modern Military Policy. Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Martin, Lawrence. “Limited Nuclear War.” In Howard, ed. Restraints on War, 103–122.Google Scholar

Martin, , Richard, Wayne. “An Analysis of United States International Relations before and during Limited War.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Southern California, 1970.Google Scholar