Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T03:11:15.592Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - Privacy

from PART I

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2016

Steven H. Shiffrin
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Get access

Summary

Privacy is a much treasured right in the American Constitution even though the word does not appear in the written document. In addition, privacy is protected in various statutory and common law contexts wholly apart from the constitutional reach of privacy protection. At its most general level, privacy refers the right to be left alone. It seems to protect a sphere of private autonomy. Thus, we refer to the “private” market, which many conservatives feel should not be regulated.

More centrally, however, privacy refers to a zone of intimacy in which human beings can live flourishing lives without the intrusion and scrutiny of others. That zone can include the right to determine whether or not to bear a child, including the right to use contraceptives or to have an abortion, the right to engage in sexual relations including same-sex relations, and the right to be free from unreasonable searches. Privacy protects communications between spouses, lawyer and client, doctor (or psychotherapist) and patient, priest and penitent. In some states, it provides that data about a human being cannot be collected or disseminated. It might promote government efficiency in combating crime and it would surely advance the cause of the social sciences, but we would not tolerate cameras and recording devices in our homes, let alone our bedrooms. Human beings require a private life in which they are not on a public stage. Friendships and intimate relations are rooted in the disclosure of our “private” selves. Our public face ordinarily wears a mask of formality, which to various degrees we shed in private. We may never be a wholly open book, but we are more open to some than others. In addition, privacy enables us to develop our own independent personality, our sense of creativity, and our critical sensibilities and substance. Without privacy, the evidence suggests that we tend to conform, to do what is expected of us, and to succumb to social construction, inhibiting play, innovation, and independence. In this respect, to protect privacy is to encourage values supported by the First Amendment.

If government, another institution, or a person invades our privacy, we believe that our human dignity has been compromised. Freedom of speech itself is partly based on a commitment to the dignity of human beings and their right to make autonomous decisions as to how their lives should be lived.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Privacy
  • Steven H. Shiffrin, Cornell University, New York
  • Book: What's Wrong with the First Amendment
  • Online publication: 05 September 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316676042.002
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Privacy
  • Steven H. Shiffrin, Cornell University, New York
  • Book: What's Wrong with the First Amendment
  • Online publication: 05 September 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316676042.002
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Privacy
  • Steven H. Shiffrin, Cornell University, New York
  • Book: What's Wrong with the First Amendment
  • Online publication: 05 September 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316676042.002
Available formats
×