Arrow, K. J. (1951/1963/2012): Social Choice and Individual Values, New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1st ed., 1951; 2nd ed., with “Notes on the Theory of Social Choice, 1963,” New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1963; 3rd ed., New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Barone, E. (1935): “The Ministry of Production in the Collectivist State,” in von Hayek, F. A., ed., Collectivist Economic Planning, London: Routledge, pp. 245–290.Google Scholar

Bentham, J. (1776): A Fragment on Government, London: T. Payne.Google Scholar

Bergson, A. (1938): “A Reformulation of Certain Aspects of Welfare Economics,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 52, pp. 310–334.Google Scholar

Bergson, A. (1976): “Social Choice and Welfare Economics under Representative Government,” Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 6, pp. 171–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berlin, I. (1969): Four Essays on Liberty, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bossert, W. and Suzumura, K. (2016): “The Greatest Unhappiness of the Least Number,” Social Choice and Welfare, Vol. 47, pp. 187–205.Google Scholar

Deb, R., Pattanaik, P. K., and Razzolini, L. (1997): “Game Forms, Rights, and the Efficiency of Social Outcomes,” Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 72, pp. 74–95.Google Scholar

Edgeworth, F. (1881): Mathematical Psychics: An Essay on the Application of Mathematics to the Moral Sciences, London: Kegan & Paul.Google Scholar

Gaertner, W., Pattanaik, P. K., and Suzumura, K. (1992/2016): “Individual Rights Revisited,” Economica, Vol. 59, pp. 161–177. Reprinted in Suzumura (2016), pp. 423–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gibbard, A. (1974): “A Pareto-Consistent Libertarian Claim,” Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 7, pp. 388–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gorman, W. M. (1955): “The Intransitivity of Certain Criteria Used in Welfare Economics,” Oxford Economic Papers, Vol. 7, pp. 25–35.Google Scholar

Gorman, W. M. (1956/1980): “The Demand for Related Goods: A Possible Procedure for Analysing Quality Differentials in the Egg Market,” Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 47, 1980, pp. 843–856. First circulated as Journal Paper No. 2319, Iowa Agricultural Experiment Station, November 1956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Graaff, J. de V. (1957): Theoretical Welfare Economics, London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Harsanyi, J. C. (1955): “Cardinal Welfare, Individual Ethics and Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility,” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 63, pp. 309–321.Google Scholar

Hicks, J. R. (1940/1981): “The Evaluation of the Social Income,” Economica, Vol. 7, 1940, pp. 105–124. Reprinted in Hicks (1981), pp. 78–99.Google Scholar

Hicks, J. R. (no date; c. 1955): “Another Shot at Welfare Economics, Lecture I and Lecture II,” unpublished typescript, 19 pages folio + 21 pages, diagrams in the text.Google Scholar

Hicks, J. R. (1959/1981): “Preface – and a Manifesto,” in his Essays in World Economics, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1959. Reprinted in Hicks (1981), pp. 135–141.Google Scholar

Hicks, J. R. (no date; c. 1963): “The Real Product – A Revision of Welfare Economics,” unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar

Hicks, J. R. (1975/1981): “The Scope and Status of Welfare Economics,” Oxford Economic Papers, Vol. 27, 1975, pp. 307–326. Reprinted in Hicks (1981), pp. 218–239.Google Scholar

Hicks, J. R. (1981): Wealth and Welfare: Collected Essays on Economic Theory, Vol. 1, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Kaldor, N. (1939): “Welfare Propositions in Economics and Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility,” Economic Journal, Vol. 49, pp. 549–552.Google Scholar

Lancaster, K. J. (1966): “A New Approach to Consumer Theory,” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 74, pp. 132–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lancaster, K. J. (1971): Consumer Demand: A New Approach, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Mishan, E. J. (1960): “A Survey of Welfare Economics, 1939–1959,” Economic Journal, Vol. 70, pp. 197–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mitchell, W. C. (1937): The Backward Art of Spending Money and Other Essays, New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Nozick, R. (1974): Anarchy, State and Utopia, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Nussbaum, M. C. and Sen, A. K., eds. (1993): The Quality of Life, Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pigou, A. C. (1920/1932/1999): The Economics of Welfare, London: Macmillan, 1st ed., 1920; 4th ed., 1932. Reprinted in Vol. 3 of Pigou’s Collected Economic Writings, London: Macmillan, 1999.Google Scholar

Putnam, H. (2002): The Collapse of the Fact/Value Dichotomy and Other Essays, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Rawls, J. (1971/1999): A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, original ed., 1971; revised ed., 1999.Google Scholar

Robbins, L. (1932/1935): An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science, London: Macmillan, 1st ed., 1932; 2nd ed., 1935.Google Scholar

Robbins, L. (1938): “Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility,” Economic Journal, Vol. 48, pp. 635–641.Google Scholar

Robbins, L. (1981): “Economics and Political Economy,” American Economic Review, Vol. 71, pp. 1–10.Google Scholar

Samuelson, P. A. (1947/1983): Foundations of Economic Analysis, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1st ed., 1947; enlarged 2nd ed., 1983.Google Scholar

Samuelson, P. A. (1950): “Evaluation of Real National Income,” Oxford Economic Papers, Vol. 2, pp. 1–29.Google Scholar

Samuelson, P. A. (1981): “Bergsonian Welfare Economics,” in Rosefielde, S., ed., Economic Welfare and the Economics of Soviet Socialism: Essays in Honor of Abram Bergson, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 223–266.Google Scholar

Scitovsky, T. (1941): “A Note on Welfare Propositions in Economics,” Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 9, pp. 77–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sen, A. K. (1970a): Collective Choice and Social Welfare, San Francisco: Holden-Day.Google Scholar

Sen, A. K. (1970b): “The Impossibility of a Paretian Liberal,” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 78, pp. 152–157.Google Scholar

Sen, A. K. (1976): “Liberty, Unanimity and Rights,” Economica, Vol. 43, pp. 217–245.Google Scholar

Sen, A. K. (1980): “Equality of What?” in McMurrin, S., ed., The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, Vol. 4, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 195–220.Google Scholar

Sen, A. K. (1982): Choice, Welfare and Measurement, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Sen, A. K. (1985): Commodities and Capabilities, Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar

Sen, A. K. (1993): “Capability and Well-Being,” in Nussbaum, and Sen, , pp. 30–53.Google Scholar

Sen, A. K. (1996): “On the Foundations of Welfare Economics: Utility, Capability and Practical Reason,” in Farina, F., Hahn, F. H., and Vannucci, S., eds., Ethics, Rationality and Economic Behaviour, Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 50–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sen, A. K. (2009): The Idea of Justice, London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar

Sen, A. K. (2017): Collective Choice and Social Welfare, expanded ed., London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Sugden, R. (1985): “Liberty, Preference and Choice,” Economics and Philosophy, Vol. 1, pp. 185–205.Google Scholar

Suzumura, K. (1996/2016): “Welfare, Rights, and Social Choice Procedure: A Perspective,” Analyse & Kritik, Vol. 18, pp. 20–37. Reprinted in Suzumura (2016), pp. 447–467.Google Scholar

Suzumura, K. (1999/2016): “Paretian Welfare Judgments and Bergsonian Social Choice,” Economic Journal, Vol. 109, pp. 204–220. Reprinted in Suzumura (2016), pp. 709–730.Google Scholar

Suzumura, K. (2002/2016): “Introduction” to Arrow, K. J., Sen, A. K., and Suzumura, K., eds., Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare, Vol. 1, Amsterdam: Elsevier Science B. V., North-Holland, pp. 1–32. Reprinted in Suzumura (2016), pp. 671–708.Google Scholar

Suzumura, K. (2005/2011): “An Interview with Paul Samuelson: Welfare Economics, ‘Old’ and ‘New’, and Social Choice Theory,” Social Choice and Welfare, Vol. 25, pp. 327–356. Reprinted in Murray, J., ed., The Collected Scientific Papers of Paul A. Samuelson, Vol. 6, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2011, pp. 843–872.Google Scholar

Suzumura, K. (2011): “Welfarism, Individual Rights, and Procedural Fairness,” in Arrow, K. J., Sen, A. K., and Suzumura, K., eds., Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare, Vol. 2, Amsterdam: Elsevier Science B. V., North-Holland, pp. 605–685.Google Scholar

Suzumura, K. (2016): Choice, Preferences, and Procedures: A Rational Choice Theoretic Approach, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Suzumura, K. (2020): “The Capability Approach from the Viewpoint of Welfare Economics and Social Choice Theory,” in Chiappero, Enrica, Osmani, Siddiq, and Qizilbash, Mozaffar, eds., The Cambridge Handbook of the Capability Approach, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 106–125.Google Scholar

Suzumura, K. and Xu, Y. (2001): “Characterizations of Consequentialism and Non-consequentialism,” Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 101, pp. 423–436. Reprinted in Suzumura (2016), pp. 505–519.Google Scholar

Suzumura, K. and Xu, Y. (2004): “Welfarist-Consequentialism, Similarity of Attitudes, and Arrow’s General Impossibility Theorem,” Social Choice and Welfare, Vol. 22, pp. 237–251. Reprinted in Suzumura (2016), pp. 537–556.Google Scholar

Amadae, S. M. (2003) Rationalizing Capitalist Democracy: The Cold War Origins of Rational Choice Liberalism. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar

Arrow, K. J. (1951) Social Choice and Individual Values. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar

Backhouse, R. E. (2017) Founder of Modern Economics: Paul A. Samuelson. Oxford University Press, Oxford and New York.Google Scholar

Bator, F. M. (1960) The Question of Government Spending: Public Needs and Private Wants. Harper and Row, New York.Google Scholar

Bergson, A. (1938) A Reformulation of Certain Aspects of Welfare Economics. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 52, 310–34.Google Scholar

Burk (Bergson), A. (1936) Real Income, Expenditure Proportionality, and Frisch’s “New Methods of Measuring Marginal Utility.” The Review of Economic Studies, 4, 33–52.Google Scholar

Clark, J. B. (1899) The Distribution of Wealth. New York, Macmillan.Google Scholar

Emmett, R. B. (2009) Frank Knight and the Chicago School in Modern Economics. Routledge, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hobson, J. A. (1914) Work and Wealth: A Human Valuation. Macmillan, London.Google Scholar

Igersheim, H. (2017) The Death of Welfare Economics: History of a Controversy. CHOPE Working Paper, 2017-03, 1–37.Google Scholar

Knight, F. H. (1923) The Ethics of Competition. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 37, 579–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knight, F. H. (1997) The Ethics of Competition. Transaction Press, New Brunswick, NJ.Google Scholar

Little, I. M. D. (1950) A Critique of Welfare Economics. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar

Myrdal, G. (1932) Das Politisches Element in der Nationaloekonomischen Doctrinbildung. Juncker und Duennhaupt, Berlin. English translation: The Political Element in the Development of Economic Theory. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1953, translated by Paul Streeten.Google Scholar

Pareto, V. (1909) Manuel d’economie politique. Giard et Briere, Paris.Google Scholar

Pigou, A. C. (1920) The Economics of Welfare. Macmillan, London. 1st ed.Google Scholar

Pigou, A. C. (1932) The Economics of Welfare. Macmillan, London. 4th ed.Google Scholar

Ramsey, F. P. (1928) A Mathematical Theory of Saving. The Economic Journal, 38(152), 543–59.Google Scholar

Robbins, L. C. (1932) An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science. Macmillan, London.Google Scholar

Robbins, L. (1950) The Economic Problem in Peace and War: Some Reflections on Objectives and Mechanisms. Macmillan, London.Google Scholar

Samuelson, P. A. (1937) A Note on Measurement of Utility. The Review of Economic Studies, 4, 155–61.Google Scholar

Samuelson, P. A. (1938a) The Numerical Representation of Ordered Classifications and the Concept of Utility. The Review of Economic Studies, 6, 65–70.Google Scholar

Samuelson, P. A. (1938b) Welfare Economics and International Trade. The American Economic Review, 28, 261–6.Google Scholar

Samuelson, P. A. (1938c) A Note on the Pure Theory of Consumer’s Behaviour. Economica, 5, 61–71.Google Scholar

Samuelson, P. A. (1939) The Gains from International Trade. The Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science / Revue canadienne d’Economique et de Science politique, 5, 195–205.Google Scholar

Samuelson, P. A. (1940) Foundations of Analytical Economics: The Observational Significance of Economic Theory. PhD thesis, Harvard University.Google Scholar

Samuelson, P. A. (1943) Further Commentary on Welfare Economics. The American Economic Review, 33, 604–7.Google Scholar

Samuelson, P. A. (1947) Foundations of Economic Analysis. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Samuelson, P. A. (1948a) Letter to Jacob Viner. Paul A. Samuelson Papers, Rubenstein Library, Duke University, Box 74.Google Scholar

Samuelson, P. A. (1948b) Review of Studies in the Theory of Welfare Economics by Melvin W. Reder. American Economic Review, 38, 397–400.Google Scholar

Samuelson, P. A. (1949) Review of Hla Myint, Theories of Welfare Economics. Economica, 16, 371–4.Google Scholar

Samuelson, P. A. (1950a) Evaluation of Real National Income. Oxford Economic Papers, 2, 1–29.Google Scholar

Samuelson, P. A. (1950b) The Problem of Integrability in Utility Theory. Economica, 17, 355–85.Google Scholar

Samuelson, P. A. (1951) Politics, Ethics, and Economics. Unpublished paper, in Paul A. Samuelson Papers, Rubenstein Library, Duke University, Box 133.Google Scholar

Samuelson, P. A. (1981) Bergsonian Welfare Economics. In Economic Welfare and the Economics of Soviet Socialism: Essays in Honor of Abram Bergson (ed. Rosefielde, S.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 223–66.Google Scholar

Stigler, G. J. (1943) The New Welfare Economics. The American Economic Review, 33, 355–9.Google Scholar

Suzumura, K. (2005) An Interview with Paul Samuelson: Welfare Economics, “Old” and “New,” and Social Choice Theory. Social Choice and Welfare, 25, 327–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baumol, William J. 1972. “On Taxation and the Control of Externalities.” American Economic Review 62–3, 307–322.Google Scholar

Bensusan-Butt, D. M. 1974. “Political Economy for Aesthetes.” Australian Economic Papers 13–23, 178–187.Google Scholar

Bertrand, Elodie. 2010. “The Three Uses of the ‘Coase Theorem’ in Coase’s Works.” European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 17–4, 975–1000.Google Scholar

Bertrand, Elodie 2018. “George Stigler: The First Apostle of the Coase Theorem.” In Understanding the Enigmatic George Stigler: Extending Price Theory in Economics and Beyond, edited by Freedman, Craig. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 445–475.Google Scholar

Boll-De Kock, Suzan. 1976. “A Critical View on Liability Rules in Theory and Practice: The Belgian Case.” Recherches Économiques de Louvain / Louvain Economic Review 42–1, 23–36.Google Scholar

Bromley, Daniel W. 1978. “Property Rules, Liability Rules, and Environmental Economics.” Journal of Economic Issues 12–1, 43–60.Google Scholar

Bromley, Daniel W. 1990. “The Ideology of Efficiency: Searching for a Theory of Policy Analysis.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 19–1, 86–107.Google Scholar

Buchanan, James M. and Stubblebine, Wm. Craig. 1962. “Externality.” Economica 29–116, 371–384.Google Scholar

Burrows, Paul. 1970. “On External Costs and the Visible Arm of the Law.” Oxford Economic Papers 22–1, 39–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Calabresi, Guido. 1970. The Cost of Accidents: A Legal and Economic Analysis. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Chisholm, Tony, Walsh, Cliff, and Brennan, Geoffrey. 1974. “Pollution and Resource Allocation.” Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics 18–1, 1–21.Google Scholar

Coase, Ronald H. 1960. “The Problem of Social Cost.” Journal of Law and Economics 3–1, 1–44.Google Scholar

Common, Michael. 1988. Environmental and Resource Economics. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Commons, John R. 1924. Legal Foundations of Capitalism. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Cooter, Robert D. 1987. “Torts as the Union of Liberty and Efficiency: An Essay on Causation.” Chicago-Kent Law Review 63, 523–551.Google Scholar

Demsetz, Harold. 1964. “The Exchange and Enforcement of Property Rights.” Journal of Law and Economics 7–1, 11–26.Google Scholar

Demsetz, Harold 1968. “The Cost of Transacting.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 82–1, 33–53.Google Scholar

Dick, Daniel T. 1974. Pollution, Congestion and Nuisance. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar

Dick, Daniel T. 1976. “The Voluntary Approach to Externality Problems: A Survey of the Critics.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 2–3, 185–195.Google Scholar

Edel, Matthew. 1973. Economics and the Environment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Fisher, Anthony C. and Peterson, Frederick M.. 1976. “The Environment in Economics: A Survey.” Journal of Economic Literature 14–1, 1–33.Google Scholar

Fiss, Owen M. 1986. “Death of the Law.” Cornell Law Review 72–1, 1–15.Google Scholar

Head, John G. 1974. “Public Policies and Pollution Problems.” FinanzArchiv / Public Finance Analysis 33–1, 1–29.Google Scholar

Helm, Dieter. 2005. “Economic Instruments and Environmental Policy.” Economic and Social Review 36–3, 205–228.Google Scholar

Hohfeld, Wesley. 1913. “Some Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning.” Yale Law Journal 23–1, 16–59.Google Scholar

Horner, Gerald L. 1975. “Internalizing Agricultural Nitrogen Pollution Externalities: A Case Study.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 57–1, 33–39.Google Scholar

Kaplow, Louis and Shavell, Steven. 2003. “Fairness versus Welfare: Notes on the Pareto Principle, Preferences, and Distributive Justice.” Journal of Legal Studies 32–1, 331–362.Google Scholar

Kapp, K. William. 1950. The Social Costs of Private Enterprise. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Kneese, Allen V. 1964. The Economics of Regional Water Quality Management. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar

Landes, William M. and Posner, Richard A.. 1983. “Causation in Tort Law: An Economic Approach.” Journal of Legal Studies 12–1, 109–134.Google Scholar

Liebhafsky, H. H. 1973. “The Problem of Social Cost: An Alternative Approach.” Natural Resources Journal 13–4, 615–676.Google Scholar

Lowry, S. Todd. 1976. “Bargain and Contract Theory in Law and Economics.” Journal of Economic Issues 10–1, 1–22.Google Scholar

Marciano, Alain. 2018. “Why Is ‘Stigler’s Coase Theorem’ Stiglerian? A Methodological Explanation.” Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology 36A, 127–155.Google Scholar

Medema, Steven G. 1996. “Of Pangloss, Pigouvians, and Pragmatism: Ronald Coase on Social Cost Analysis.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 18–1, 96–114.Google Scholar

Medema, Steven G. 2011. “A Case of Mistaken Identity: George Stigler, ‘The Problem of Social Cost,’ and the Coase Theorem.” European Journal of Law and Economics 31–1, 11–38.Google Scholar

Medema, Steven G. 2014. “The Curious Treatment of the Coase Theorem in Environmental Economics, 1960–1979.” Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 8–1, 39–57.Google Scholar

Medema, Steven G. 2015. “How Textbooks Create Knowledge and Meaning: The Case of the ‘Coase Theorem’ in Intermediate Microeconomics, 1960–1979.” Working Paper, University of Colorado Denver.Google Scholar

Medema, Steven G. 2020. “‘Exceptional and Unimportant’? Externalities, Competitive Equilibrium, and the Myth of a Pigovian Tradition.” History of Political Economy 52–1, 135–170.Google Scholar

Milliman, Jerome W. 1962. “Can People Be Trusted with Natural Resources?” Land Economics 38–3, 199–218.Google Scholar

Mishan, E. J. 1965. “Reflections on Recent Developments in the Concept of External Effects.” Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science / Revue Canadienne d’Economique et de Science Politique 31–1, 3–34.Google Scholar

Mishan, E. J. 1967a. The Costs of Economic Growth. New York: Frederick A. Praeger.Google Scholar

Mishan, E. J. 1967b. “Pareto Optimality and the Law.” Oxford Economic Papers 19–3, 255–287.Google Scholar

Mishan, E. J. 1971a. “Pangloss on Pollution.” Swedish Journal of Economics 73–1, 113–120.Google Scholar

Mishan, E. J. 1971b. “The Postwar Literature on Externalities: An Interpretative Essay.” Journal of Economic Literature 9–1, 1–28.Google Scholar

Mishan, E. J. 1974. “What Is the Optimal Level of Pollution?” Journal of Political Economy 82–6, 1287–1299.Google Scholar

Papandreou, Andreas A. 1994. Externality and Institutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Parish, Ross M. 1972. “Economic Aspects of Pollution Control.” Australian Economic Papers 11–18, 32–43.Google Scholar

Pearce, David W. 1976. Environmental Economics. London; New York: Longman.Google Scholar

Pigou, A. C. 1920. The Economics of Welfare. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Posner, Richard A. 1973. Economic Analysis of Law. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.Google Scholar

Randall, Alan. 1971. “Market Solutions to Externality Problems: Theory and Practice.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 53–5, 867.Google Scholar

Randall, Alan 1972a. “Market Solutions to Externality Problems: Theory and Practice.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 54–2, 175–183.Google Scholar

Randall, Alan 1972b. On the Theory of Market Solutions to Externality Problems. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University Agricultural Experiment Station Special Report 351.Google Scholar

Randall, Alan 1974. “Coasian Externality Theory in a Policy Context.” Natural Resources Journal 14–1, 35–54.Google Scholar

Randall, Alan 1975. “Property Rights and Social Microeconomics.” Natural Resources Journal 15–4, 729–747.Google Scholar

Randall, Alan 1978. “Property Institutions and Economic Behavior.” Journal of Economic Issues 12–1, 1–21.Google Scholar

Reynolds, Lloyd G. 1973. Microeconomic Analysis and Policy. Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin.Google Scholar

Samuels, Warren J. 1972. “Welfare Economics, Power, and Property.” In Perspectives of Property, edited by Wunderlich, G. and Gilson, W. L.. University Park, PA: Institute for Research on Land and Water Resources, 61–127. Reprinted in Warren J. Samuels and A. Allen Schmid, eds., Law and Economics: An Institutionalist Perspective. Boston, MA: Nijhoff, 1981, pp. 9–75.Google Scholar

Samuels, Warren J. 1974. “The Coase Theorem and the Study of Law and Economics.” Natural Resources Journal 14–1, 1–33.Google Scholar

Sen, Amartya. 1979. “Utilitarianism and Welfarism.” Journal of Philosophy 76–9, 463–489.Google Scholar

Stigler, George J. 1966. The Theory of Price, 3rd ed. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Thompson, Donald N. 1973. The Economics of Environmental Protection. Cambridge, MA: Winthrop Publishers.Google Scholar

Tollison, Robert D. and Wagner, Richard E.. 1988. Smoking and the State: Social Costs, Rent Seeking, and Public Policy. Lexington, MD: D. C. Heath.Google Scholar

Weld, John. 1973. “Coase, Social Cost and Stability: An Integrative Essay.” Natural Resources Journal 13–4, 595–613.Google Scholar

Wellisz, Stanislaw. 1964. “On External Diseconomies and the Government-Assisted Invisible Hand.” Economica 31–124, 345–362.Google Scholar

Amadae, Sonja M. 2003. Rationalizing Capitalist Democracy: The Cold War Origins of Rational Choice Liberalism. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Atkinson, Anthony B., Cnossen, Sijbren, Ladd, Helen F., Mieszkowski, Peter, Pestieau, Pierre, and Samuelson, Paul A.. 2008. ‘Commemorating Richard Musgrave (1910–2007)’. FinanzArchiv: Public Finance Analysis 64(2): 145–70.Google Scholar

Bok, P. Mackenzie. 2015. ‘To the Mountaintop Again: The Early Rawls and Post-Protestant Ethics in Postwar America’. Modern Intellectual History: 1–33.Google Scholar

Buchanan, James M. 1949. ‘The Pure Theory of Government Finance: A Suggested Approach’. The Journal of Political Economy 57(6): 496–505.Google Scholar

Buchanan, James M., and Tullock, Gordon. 1962. The Calculus of Consent. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Cherrier, Beatrice, and Fleury, Jean-Baptiste. 2017. ‘Economists’ Interest in Collective Decision after World War II: A History’. Public Choice 172(1–2): 23–44.Google Scholar

Cooter, Robert D. 1975. ‘What Is the Public Interest’. PhD dissertation. Harvard University.Google Scholar

Cooter, Robert D., and Rappoport, Peter. 1984. ‘Were the Ordinalists Wrong about Welfare Economics?’ Journal of Economic Literature 22(2): 507–30.Google Scholar

Davis, John B. 1990. ‘Cooter and Rappoport on the Normative’. Economics and Philosophy 6(1): 139–46.Google Scholar

Desmarais-Tremblay, Maxime. 2014. ‘Normative and Positive Theories of Public Finance: Contrasting Musgrave and Buchanan’. Journal of Economic Methodology 21(3): 273–89.Google Scholar

Desmarais-Tremblay, Maxime 2017a. ‘A Genealogy of the Concept of Merit Wants’. The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 24(3): 409–40.Google Scholar

Desmarais-Tremblay, Maxime 2017b. ‘Musgrave, Samuelson, and the Crystallization of the Standard Rationale for Public Goods’. History of Political Economy 49(1): 59–92.Google Scholar

Desmarais-Tremblay, Maxime 2019. ‘The Normative Problem of Merit Goods in Perspective’. Forum for Social Economics 48(3): 219–47.Google Scholar

Desmarais-Tremblay, Maxime in press. ‘Généalogie du principe d’équité horizontale: Une contribution à l’histoire de la normativité en théorie des finances publiques’. Revue de philosophie économique.Google Scholar

Desmarais-Tremblay, Maxime, and Johnson, Marianne. 2019. ‘“The Fiscal Policy Seminar: Its Early Stages” by Richard A. Musgrave’. Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology 37 C: 147–79.Google Scholar

Forrester, Katrina. 2019. In the Shadow of Justice: Postwar Liberalism and the Remaking of Political Philosophy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Gutmann, Amy. 1985. ‘Review: Communitarian Critics of Liberalism’. Philosophy & Public Affairs 14(3): 308–22.Google Scholar

Hawi, Rima. 2016. John Rawls – Itinéraire d’un libéral américain vers l’égalité sociale. Paris: Classiques Garnier.Google Scholar

Hayek, Friedrich A. 1944. The Road to Serfdom. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

McCloskey, Deirdre N. 1994. Knowledge and Persuasion in Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Medema, Steven G. 2000. ‘“Related Disciplines”: The Professionalization of Public Choice Analysis’. History of Political Economy 32 (Supplement): 289–324.Google Scholar

Musgrave, Richard A. 1937. ‘The Theory of Public Finance and the Concept of “Burden of Taxation”’. PhD dissertation. Harvard University.Google Scholar

Musgrave, Richard A. 1959. The Theory of Public Finance: A Study in Public Economy. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar

Musgrave, Richard A. 1964. ‘Efficiency vs. Equity in Public Finance’. Review of Social Economy 22(1): 1–8.Google Scholar

Musgrave, Richard A. 1969. ‘Provision for Social Goods’. In Public Economics: An Analysis of Public Production and Consumption and Their Relations to the Private Sectors, edited by Margolis, Julius and Guitton, H., 124–44. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Musgrave, Richard A. 1981. ‘Leviathan Cometh – Or Does He?’ In Public Finance in a Democratic Society. Volume II: Fiscal Doctrine, Growth and Institutions, 200–32. Brighton: Wheatsheaf Books.Google Scholar

Musgrave, Richard A. 1986. Public Finance in a Democratic Society. Volume I: Social Goods, Taxation and Fiscal Policy. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar

Musgrave, Richard A. 1987. ‘Merit Goods’. The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, edited by Eatwell, John, Milgate, Murray, and Newman, Peter, 1958–60. London: Palgrave, 452–3.Google Scholar

Musgrave, Richard A. 1996. ‘Public Finance and Finanzwissenschaft Traditions Compared’. In Public Finance in a Democratic Society. Volume III, 2000, 33–80. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Musgrave, Richard A. 1997. ‘Crossing Traditions’. In Zur Deutschsprachigen Wirtschaftswissenschaftlichen Emigration Nach 1933, edited by Hagemann, Harald, 63–79. Marburg: Metropolis-Verlag.Google Scholar

Musgrave, Richard A., and Buchanan, James M.. 1999. Public Finance and Public Choice: Two Contrasting Visions of the State. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Musgrave, Richard A., and Musgrave, Peggy B.. 1976. Public Finance in Theory and Practice. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar

Musgrave, Richard A., and Musgrave, Peggy B. 1980. Public Finance in Theory and Practice. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar

Nagel, Thomas. 2013. ‘Foreword’. In Anarchy, State, and Utopia, by Nozick, Robert, xi–xviii. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Nozick, Robert. 1974. Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Pareto, Vilfredo. 1898. ‘Comment se pose le problème de l’économie pure’. Reprinted in Cahiers Vilfredo Pareto 1(1): 121–30 (1963).Google Scholar

Pigou, Arthur Cecil. 1928. A Study in Public Finance. 3rd ed., 1960. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Pigou, Arthur Cecil 1932. The Economics of Welfare. 4th ed. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Rau, Karl Heinrich. 1837. Lehrbuch der Politischen Oekonomie. Grundsätze der Volkswirtschaftslehre. French translation of the 3rd ed. Traité d’économie nationale. 1839. Brussels: Société Belge de Librairie. Hauman et cie.Google Scholar

Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Rawls, John 2009. A Brief Inquiry into the Meaning of Sin and Faith: An Interpretation Based on the Concept of Community, edited by Nagel, Thomas. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Read, Colin. 2016. ‘The Early Life of Richard Musgrave’. In The Public Financiers, 144–9. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Reiner, Toby. 2011. ‘The Sources of Communitarianism on the American Left: Pluralism, Republicanism, and Participatory Democracy’. History of European Ideas 37(3). 293–303.Google Scholar

Ritschl, Hans. 1931. Gemeinwirtschaft und Kapitalistische Marktwirtschaft. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).Google Scholar

Roemer, John E. 1996. Theories of Distributive Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Sax, Emil. 1924. ‘Die Wertungstheorie der Steuer’. Zeitschrift für Volkswirthchaft und Sozialpolitik 4(4–6): 191–240.Google Scholar

Schmoller, Gustav. 1900. Grundriß der Allgemeinen Volkswirtschaftslehre. French translation Principes d’économie politique. 1905. Paris: V. Giard et E. Brière.Google Scholar

Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1908. The Nature and Essence of Economic Theory. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers. Translated by Bruce A. McDaniel from Das Wesen und der Hauptinhalt der theoretischen Nationalökonomie. 2010.Google Scholar

Sen, Amartya K. 1970a. ‘Interpersonal Aggregation and Partial Comparability’. Econometrica 38(3): 393–409.Google Scholar

Sen, Amartya K. 1970b. Collective Choice and Social Welfare. London: Penguin. 2017 Extended Edition.Google Scholar

Sen, Amartya K. 1977. ‘Rational Fools: A Critique of the Behavioral Foundations of Economic Theory’. Philosophy and Public Affairs 6(4): 317–44.Google Scholar

Sinn, Hans-Werner. 2009. ‘Please Bring Me the New York Times: On the European Roots of Richard Abel Musgrave’. International Tax and Public Finance 16(1): 124–35.Google Scholar

Sturn, Richard. 2016a. ‘Public Economics’. In Handbook on the History of Economic Analysis. Volume III: Developments in Major Fields of Economics, edited by Faccarello, Gilbert and Kurz, Heinz D., 480–98. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Sturn, Richard 2016b. ‘Richard Abel Musgrave (1910–2007)’. In Handbook on the History of Economic Analysis. Volume I: Great Economists since Petty and Boisguilbert, edited by Faccarello, Gilbert and Kurz, Heinz D., 634–37. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Taylor, Charles. 1990. ‘Irreducibly Social Goods’. In Rationality, Individualism, and Public Policy, edited by Brennan, Geoffrey and Walsh, Cliff, 45–63. Canberra: Centre for Research on Federal Financial Relations, the Australian National University.Google Scholar

Tönnies, Ferdinand. 1887. Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft. Translated as Community and Civil Society by Harris, Jose. 2001. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Tribe, Keith. 1988. Governing Economy: The Reformation of German Economic Discourse 1750–1840. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Unger, Roberto Mangabeira. 1975. Knowledge and Politics. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar

Wagner, Adolph. 1892. Lehr- und Handbuch der Politischen Oekonomie. Grundlegung der Politischen Oekonomie. 3rd ed. Translated in French as Les fondements de l’économie politique. 1904. Paris: V. Giard et E. Brière.Google Scholar

Weber, Max. 1922. Wirthschaft und Gesellschaft. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck). A new English translation of Economy and Society by Keith Tribe. 2019. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Amadae, Sonia, 2003, Rationalizing Capitalist Democracy: The Cold War Origins of Rational Choice Liberalism, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Arrow, Kenneth. 1963[1951], Social Choice and Individual Values, 2nd ed., New York: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Arrow, Kenneth. 1967, “The Place of Moral Obligation in Preference System,” in Hook, Sidney, ed., Human Values and Economic Policy, New York: New York University Press, p. 118.Google Scholar

Arrow, Kenneth. 1970, “Political Economic Evaluation of Social Effects and Externalities,” NBER chapters, in The Analysis of Public Output, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, pp. 1–30.Google Scholar

Arrow, Kenneth. 1972a, “Gifts and Exchanges,” Philosophy & Public Affairs, Vol. 1, No. 4, pp. 343–362.Google Scholar

Arrow, Kenneth. 1972b, “Models of Job Discrimination,” in Pascal, Anthony H. (ed.), Racial Discrimination in Economic Life, Lexington: D. C. Heath, pp. 83–102.Google Scholar

Arrow, Kenneth. 1972c, “Some Mathematical Models of Race Discrimination in the Labor Market,” in Pascal, Anthony H. (ed.), Racial Discrimination in Economic Life. Lexington: D. C. Heath, pp. 187–204.Google Scholar

Arrow, Kenneth. 1973a, “Some Ordinalist-Utilitarian Notes on Rawls’s Theory of Justice,” Journal of Philosophy, 70, pp. 245–263.Google Scholar

Arrow, Kenneth. 1973b, “The Theory of Discrimination,” in Ashenfelter, Orley and Rees, Albert (eds.), Discrimination in Labor Markets, Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 3–33.Google Scholar

Arrow, Kenneth. 1974, The Limits of Organization, New York: Norton.Google Scholar

Arrow, Kenneth. 1983, Collected Papers of Kenneth J. Arrow: Social Choice and Justice, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Arrow, Kenneth. 1985, “Distributive Justice and Desirable Ends of Economic Activity,” in Feiwel, George (ed.), Issues in Contemporary Macroeconomics and Distribution, Albany: State University of New York Press, pp. 134–156.Google Scholar

Arrow, Kenneth. 1994, “Methodological Individualism and Social Knowledge,” American Economic Review, Vol. 84, No. 2, pp. 1–9.Google Scholar

Arrow, Kenneth. 1996, “Information, Responsibility, and Human Services,” in Fuchs, Victor R. (ed.), Individual and Social Responsibility: Child Care, Education, Medical Care, and Long-Term Care in America, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 229–244.Google Scholar

Arrow, Kenneth. 1997, “Invaluable Goods,” Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 35, Issue 2, pp. 757–765.Google Scholar

Arrow, Kenneth. 1998, “What Has Economics to Say about Racial Discrimination?,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 91–100.Google Scholar

Arrow, Kenneth. 2006, “Freedom and Social Choice: Notes from the Margin,” Utilitas, Vol. 18, pp. 52–60.Google Scholar

Arrow, Kenneth. 2016, On Ethics and Economics: Conversations with Kenneth J. Arrow, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Arrow, Kenneth and Debreu, Gerard, 1954, “Existence of Equilibrium for a Competitive Economy,” Econometrica, 22, pp. 265–290.Google Scholar

Arrow, Kenneth J. and Hahn, Frank H., 1971, General Competitive Analysis, San Francisco: Holden-Day.Google Scholar

Bergson, Abram, 1938, “A Reformulation of Certain Aspects of Welfare Economics,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 52, pp. 310–334.Google Scholar

Bossert, Walter and Fleurbaey, Marc, 2014, “An Interview with Kotaro Suzumura,” Hitotsubashi University Repository.Google Scholar

Chassonnery-Zaïgouche, Cléo, 2015, “Crossing Boundaries, Displacing Previous Knowledge and Claiming Superiority: Is the Economics of Discrimination a Conquest of Economics Imperialism?,” Working Paper 5.Google Scholar

Harsanyi, John C., 1975, “Can the Maximin Principle Serve as a Basis for Morality? A Critique of John Rawls’s Theory,” The American Political Science Review, Vol. 69, No. 2, pp. 594–606.Google Scholar

Kelly, Jerry S., 1987, “An Interview with Kenneth J. Arrow,” Social Choice and Welfare, Vol. 4, Issue 1, pp. 43–62.Google Scholar

Mackay, Alfred, 1980, Arrow’s Theorem: The Paradox of Social Choice: A Case Study in the Philosophy of Economics, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Mackie, Gerry, 2003, Democracy Defended, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Nozick, Robert, 1974, Anarchy, State, and Utopia, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Pildes, Richard and Anderson, Elizabeth, 1990, “Slinging Arrows at Democracy: Social Choice Theory, Value Pluralism, and Democratic Politics,” Columbia Law Review, Vol. 90, pp. 2121–2214.Google Scholar

Radin, Margaret, 1996, Contested Commodities, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Rawls, John, 1971, A Theory of Justice, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Riker, William, 1982, Liberalism against Populism: A Confrontation between the Theory of Democracy and the Theory of Social Choice, San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar

Robbins, Lionel, 1969[1932], An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science, 2nd ed., London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Saito, Nao, 2018, “The Transformation of Kenneth Arrow’s Attitude toward War,” in Ikeda, Yukihiro and Rosselli, Annalisa (eds.), War in the History of Economic Thought: Economists and the Question of War, New York: Routledge, pp. 239–257.Google Scholar

Samuelson, Paul, 1967, “Arrow’s Mathematical Politics,” in Hook, Sidney (ed.), Human Values and Economic Policy, New York: New York University Press, pp. 41–51.Google Scholar

Sen, Amartya K., 1970, “The Impossibility of Paretian Liberal,” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 78, No. 1, pp. 152–157.Google Scholar

Sen, Amartya K. 2009, The Idea of Justice, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Shionoya, Yūichi, 2005, Economy and Morality: The Philosophy of the Welfare State, North Hampton: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Alkire, S. 2002. Valuing Freedoms: Sen’s Capability Approach and Poverty Reduction, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Alkire, S. and Foster, J. 2011. Counting and Multidimensional Poverty Measurement, Journal of Public Economics 95(7–8): 476–87.Google Scholar

Backhouse, R. E. and Nishizawa, T. 2010. No Wealth but Life: Welfare Economics and the Welfare State in Britain, 1880–1945, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Basu, K. and Lopez Calva, L. F. 2011. Functionings and Capabilities, in Arrow, K., Sen, A. K. and Suzumura, K. (eds.), Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare, Volume II, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 153–87.Google Scholar

Baujard, A. 2007. Conceptions of Freedom and Ranking Opportunity Sets: A Typology, Homo Oeconomicus 24: 231–54.Google Scholar

Baujard, A. 2011. Utilité et liberté de choix dans les classements d’ensembles d’opportunités, Raisons politiques 43: 59–92.Google Scholar

Baujard, A. 2016. Welfarism, an historical perspective. 3rd International Conference Economic Philosophy, June 2016, Aix-en-Provence, France.Google Scholar

Baujard, A. and Gilardone, M. 2017. Sen Is Not a Capability Theorist, Journal of Economic Methodology 24(1): 1–19.Google Scholar

Binder, C. 2013. Plural Identities and Preference Formation. Social Choice and Welfare: 1–18. doi:10.1007/s00355-013-0761-z.Google Scholar

Binder, C. B. 2019. Agency, Freedom and Choice. Theory and Decision Library A: Rational Choice in Practical Philosophy and Philosophy of Science. Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar

Binder, C. and Binder, C. B. 2016. A Capability Perspective on Indigenous Autonomy, Oxford Development Studies 44: 297–314.Google Scholar

Dowding, K. and van Hees, M. 2009. Freedom of Choice, in Anand, P., Pattanaik, P. K. and Puppe, C. (eds.), The Handbook of Rational and Social Choice, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 374–92.Google Scholar

Drydyk, J. and Keleher, L. 2019. Routledge Handbook of Development Ethics, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Dworkin, G. 1972. Paternalism, The Monist 56: 64–84.Google Scholar

Echávarri, R. A. and Permanyer, I. 2008. Ranking Profiles of Capability Sets, Social Choice and Welfare 31: 521–35.Google Scholar

Elster, J. 1982. Sour Grapes, in Sen, A. and Williams, B. (eds.), Utilitarianism and Beyond, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 219–38.Google Scholar

Elster, J. 1983. Sour Grapes: Studies in the Subversion of Rationality, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Fiebiger Byskov, M. 2018. The Capability Approach in Practice: A New Ethics for Setting Development Agendas, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Foster, J. E. 2015. Freedom, Opportunity, and Well-Being, in Arrow, K., Sen, A. K. and Suzumura, K. (eds.), Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare, Volume II, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 687–728.Google Scholar

Fukuda-Parr, S. 2003. The Human Development Paradigm: Operationalizing Sen’s Ideas on Development, Feminist Economics 9(2/3): 301–17.Google Scholar

Gasper, D. 2002. Is Sen’s Capability Approach an Adequate Basis for Considering Human Development? Review of Political Economy 14: 435–61.Google Scholar

van Hees, M. 2016. Analysing Capabilities: Games, Groups and Effectivity, Working Paper.Google Scholar

Khader, S. 2011. Adaptive Preferences and Women’s Empowerment, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kramm, M. 2019. When a River Becomes a Person, Working Paper.Google Scholar

Kreps, D. M. 1979. A Representation Theorem for ‘Preference for Flexibility’, Econometrica 47: 565–77.Google Scholar

Nozick, R. 1974. Anarchy, State and Utopia, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Nussbaum, M. C. 1988. Nature, Function, and Capability: Aristotle on Political Distribution, in Annas, J. and Grimm, R. H. (eds.), Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, Supplementary Volume, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 145–84.Google Scholar

Nussbaum, M. C. 1993. Non-relative Virtues: An Aristotelian Approach, in Nussbaum, M. C. and Sen, A. K. (eds.), The Quality of Life, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 242–69.Google Scholar

Nussbaum, M. C. 2000. Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Nussbaum, M. C. 2001. Adaptive Preferences and Women’s Options, Economics and Philosophy 17: 67–88.Google Scholar

Nussbaum, M. C. 2006. Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Nussbaum, M. C. 2011. Creating Capabilities: The Human Development Approach, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Nussbaum, M. C. and Sen, A. K., eds. 1993. The Quality of Life, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Pattanaik, P. K. and Xu, Y. 1990. On Ranking Opportunity Sets in Terms of Freedom of Choice, Recherches Economiques de Louvain 56: 383–90.Google Scholar

Pattanaik, P. K. and Xu, Y. 1998. On Preference and Freedom, Theory and Decision 44: 173–98.Google Scholar

Pattanaik, P. K. and Xu, Y. 2012. Some Foundational Issues in the Functioning and Capability Approach to the Concept of Well-Being, in Social and Cultural Development of Human Resources [Eds. UNESCO-EOLSS Joint Committee], in Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS), developed under the Auspices of the UNESCO, EOLSS Publishers, Oxford, UK, [www.eolss.net] [Retrieved 24 April 2013].Google Scholar

Pattanaik, P. K. and Xu, Y. 2020. The Concept of Capability and Its Measurement, in Chiappero, E., Qizilbash, M. and Osmani, S. (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Capability Approach, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Qizilbash, M. 2007. Social Choice and Individual Capabilities, Politics Philosophy Economics 6: 169–92.Google Scholar

Qizilbash, M. 2016. Capability, Objectivity and ‘False Consciousness’: On Sen, Marx and J. S. Mill, International Journal of Social Economics 43: 1207–18.Google Scholar

Rawls, J. 1971/1999. A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Robeyns, I. 2011. The Capability Approach, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2016 Edition), Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/capability-approach/.Google Scholar

Robeyns, I. 2017. Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justice: The Capability Approach Re-examined, Cambridge: Open Book Publishers.Google Scholar

Saito, M. 2003. Amartya Sen’s Capability Approach to Education: A Critical Exploration, Journal of Philosophy of Education 37: 17–34.Google Scholar

Sen, A. K. 1977. On Weights and Measures: Informational Constraints in Social Welfare Analysis, Econometrica 45: 1539–72.Google Scholar

Sen, A. K. 1979a. Personal Utilities and Public Judgements: Or What’s Wrong With Welfare Economics?, The Economic Journal 89: 537–58.Google Scholar

Sen, A. K. 1979b. Utilitarianism and Welfarism, The Journal of Philosophy 76: 463–89.Google Scholar

Sen, A. K. 1980. Equality of What?, in McMurrin, S. M. (ed.), The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 195–220; reprinted in Goodin, R. E. and Pettit, P. (eds.), Contemporary Political Philosophy, An Anthology, Oxford: Blackwell, 473–83.Google Scholar

Sen, A. K. 1983. Development: Which Way Now?, The Economic Journal 93(372): 745–62.Google Scholar

Sen, A. K. 1984. Rights and Capabilities, in Resources, Values, and Development, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 307–24.Google Scholar

Sen, A. K. 1985. Commodities and Capabilities, Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar

Sen, A. K. 1987. Ethics and Economics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Sen, A. K. 1991. Welfare, Preference and Freedom, Journal of Econometrics 50: 15–29.Google Scholar

Sen, A. K. 1995. Gender Inequality and Theories of Justice, in Nussbaum, M. C. and Glover, J. (eds.), Women, Culture, and Development, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 259–73.Google Scholar

Sen, A. K. 1999. Development as Freedom, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Sen, A. K. 2002. Rationality and Freedom, The American Economic Review 89: 349–78.Google Scholar

Sen, A. K. 2009. The Idea of Justice, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Suzumura, K., and Xu, Y. 2009. Consequentialism and Non-consequentialism: The Axiomatic Approach, in Anand, P., Pattanaik, P. K. and Puppe, C. (eds.), The Handbook of Rational and Social Choice, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 346–73.Google Scholar

Wantene, K., Yap, M. and Bockstael, E. 2019. Indigenous Peoples and the Capability Approach, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Alkire, S. 2010. Development: A Misconceived Theory Can Kill, in Morris, C. W., ed., Amartya Sen, New York: Cambridge University Press: 191–219.Google Scholar

Arrow, K. J. 1950. A Difficulty in the Concept of Social Welfare, Journal of Political Economy, August, 58, 4: 328–46.Google Scholar

Barsamian, D. 2001. Reflections of an Economist, Alternative Radio, USA, India Together, September.Google Scholar

Baujard, A. and Gilardone, M. 2017. Sen Is Not a Capability Theorist, Journal of Economic Methodology, 24, 1: 1–19.Google Scholar

Baujard, A. and Gilardone, M. 2020. ’Positional Views’ as the Cornerstone of Sen’s Idea of Justice, Working paper of the Condorcet Center for Political Economy.Google Scholar

Bréban, L. and Gilardone, M. 2020. A Missing Touch of Adam Smith in Amartya Sen’s Account of Public Reasoning: The Man within for the Man Without, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 44, 2: 257–283.Google Scholar

Burchardt, T. 2009. Agency Goals, Adaptation and Capability Sets, Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 10, 1: 3–19.Google Scholar

Chanda, A. 1998. Amartya Sen Returns to Repay His Debt to Alma Mater, Rediff on the Net, 21 December, http://202.54.124.133/business/1998/dec/21sen.htm.Google Scholar

Crocker, D. A. and Robeyns, I. 2010. Capability and Agency, in Morris, C. W., ed., Amartya Sen, New York: Cambridge University Press: 60–90.Google Scholar

Davis, J. 2012. The Idea of Public Reasoning, Journal of Economic Methodology, 19, 2: 169–72.Google Scholar

Desai, M. 2001. Amartya Sen’s Contribution to Development Economics, Oxford Development Studies, 29, 3: 213–22.Google Scholar

Drèze, J. and Sen, A. K. 1989. Hunger and Public Action, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Fetherolf Loufti, M. 1998. Amartya Sen, Lauréat du Prix Nobel d’Economie, et l’OIT, Le Magazine de l’OIT, 27 December: 1–9.Google Scholar

Fine, B. J. 2004. Economics and Ethics: Amartya Sen as Point of Departure, The New School Economic Review, 1, 1: 95–103.Google Scholar

Gilardone, M. 2008. Dobb, Dasgupta et Tagore: trois sources méconnues de la pensée de Sen, Storia del Pensiero Economico, 5, 2: 107–31.Google Scholar

Gilardone, M. 2009. Inégalités de genre et approche par les capabilités: quelle mise en dialogue chez Sen?, Tiers Monde, 198: 357–71.Google Scholar

Gilardone, M. 2010. Amartya Sen sans prisme, Cahiers d’économie politique, 56: 9–39.Google Scholar

Gilardone, M. 2015. Rawls’s Influence and Counter-Influence on Sen: Post-Welfarism and Impartiality, The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 22, 2: 198–235.Google Scholar

Harsanyi, J. C. 1955. Cardinal Welfare, Individualistic Ethics, and Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility, Journal of Political Economy, 63, 4: 309–21.Google Scholar

Hirai, T. 2017. The Creation of the Human Development Approach, Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Kynch, J. and Sen, A. K. 1983. Indian Women: Well-Being and Survival, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 7, 3/4: 363–80.Google Scholar

Nozick, R. 1974. Anarchy, State and Utopia, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Peter, F. 2003. Gender and the Foundations of Social Choice: The Role of Situated Agency, Feminist Economics 9, 2: 13–32.Google Scholar

Pressman, S. and Summerfield, G. 2002. Sen and Capabilities, Review of Political Economy, 14, 4: 429–33.Google Scholar

Rawls, J. 1971. A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Sen, A. K. 1970. Collective Choice and Social Welfare, Advanced textbooks in economics. Amsterdam: North-Holland, re-edit 1979.Google Scholar

Sen, A. K. 1972. Technical Choice and Employment in the Non-wage Sector, World Employment Programme: Economic Research on Technology and Employment, Geneva: ILO.Google Scholar

Sen, A. K. 1975. Employment, Technology and Development, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Sen, A. K. 1977. On Weights and Measures: Informational Constraints in Social Welfare Analysis, Econometrica, 45, 7: 1539–72.Google Scholar

Sen, A. K. 1979. Utilitarianism and Welfarism, Journal of Philosophy, 76, 9: 463–89.Google Scholar

Sen, A. K. 1980. Equality of What?, in McMurrin, S., ed., The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, Vol. 1, Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 197–220.Google Scholar

Sen, A. K. 1981. Poverty and Famines: An Essay on Entitlement and Deprivation, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Sen, A. K. 1983a. Economics and the Family, Asian Development Review, 1, 2: 14–26.Google Scholar

Sen, A. K. 1983b. Development: Which Way Now?, The Economic Journal, 93, 372: 745–62.Google Scholar

Sen, A. K. 1984. Family and Food: Sex Bias in Poverty, in Sen, A. K., Resources, Values and Development, Oxford: Blackwell: 346–68.Google Scholar

Sen, A. K. 1985. Commodities and Capabilities, Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar

Sen, A. K. 1987. Hunger and Entitlements, Helsinki: World Institute for Development Economic Research, United Nations University.Google Scholar

Sen, A. K. 1989. Cooperation, Inequality, and the Family, Population and Development Review, 15: 61–76.Google Scholar

Sen, A. K. 1990a. Individual Freedom as a Social Commitment, New York Review of Books, 37, 10: 49–54.Google Scholar

Sen, A. K. 1990b. Gender and Cooperative Conflicts, in Tinker, I., ed., Persistent Inequalities, New York, Oxford University Press: 123–49.Google Scholar

Sen, A. K. 1992. Inequality Reexamined, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Sen, A. K. 1994. Amiya Kumar Dasgupta (1903–1992), The Economic Journal, 104, 426: 1147–55.Google Scholar

Sen, A. K. 1997. Development Thinking at the Beginning of the XXI Century, in Emmerij, L., ed., Economic and Social Development into the XXI Century, Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.Google Scholar

Sen, A. K. 1999a. Autobiography, The Nobel Prizes 1998, Tore Frängsmyr, Nobel Foundation, Stockholm, www.nobel.se/economics/laureates/1998/sen-autobio.html.Google Scholar

Sen, A. K. 1999b. Democracy as a Universal Value, Journal of Democracy, July, 10, 3: 3–17.Google Scholar

Sen, A. K. 1999c. Development as Freedom, New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar

Sen, A. K. 2001. Tagore and His India, The New York Review, 28 August, www.nobel.se/literature/articles/sen/index.html.Google Scholar

Sen, A. K. 2009. The Idea of Justice, Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Sen, A. K. 2012. Values and Justice, Journal of Economic Methodology, 19, 2: 101–8.Google Scholar

Sen, A. K. 2013. The Ends and Means of Sustainability, Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 14, 1: 6–20.Google Scholar

Sen, A. K. and Sengupta, S. 1983. Malnutrition of Rural Indian Children and the Sex Bias, Economic and Political Weekly, 18: 855–64.Google Scholar

Shaikh, N. 2004. Interview of Amartya Sen, Asia Society Online, 6 December.Google Scholar

Swedberg, R. 1990. Amartya Sen, in Swedberg, R., Economics and Sociology: Redefining Their Boundaries – Conversations with Economists and Sociologists, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press: 249–67.Google Scholar

UNDP 1990. Human Development Report. New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

UNDP 1995. Human Development Report. New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

UNDP 2010a. Human Development Report. New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

UNDP 2010b. A 20th Anniversary Human Development Discussion with Amartya Sen, pre-launch material for the Human Development Report 2010.Google Scholar

Amadae, S. M. 2003. Rationalizing Capitalist Democracy: The Cold War Origins of Rational Choice Liberalism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Arrow, K. J. 1951. An Extension of the Basic Theorems of Classical Welfare Economics, in Proceedings of the Second Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, Neyman, J. (ed.), Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press: 507–532.Google Scholar

Atkinson, A. B. 2001. The Strange Disappearance of Welfare Economics. Kyklos 54(2–3), 193–206.Google Scholar

Atkinson, A. B. 2009. Economics as a Moral Science. Economica 76(1), 791–804.Google Scholar

Backhouse, R. and Biddle, J. 2000. The Concept of Applied Economics: A History of Ambiguity and Multiple Meanings. History of Political Economy 32(5), 1–24.Google Scholar

Backhouse, R. E. and Cherrier, B. 2017. The Age of the Applied Economist. History of Political Economy 49(Supplement), 1–33.Google Scholar

Blaug, M. 2007. The Fundamental Theorems of Modern Welfare Economics, Historically Contemplated. History of Political Economy 39(2), 185–207.Google Scholar

Boulding, K. 1969. Economics as a Moral Science. American Economic Review 59(1), 1–12.Google Scholar

Chipman, J. S. and Moore, J. C. 1978. The New Welfare Economics, 1939–1974. International Economic Review 19: 547–584.Google Scholar

Debreu, G. 1951. The Coefficient of Resource Utilization. Econometrica 19(3), 273–292.Google Scholar

Fleurbaey, M. 2000. Choix social: une difficulté et de multiples possibilités. Revue Economique 51(5), 1215–1232.Google Scholar

Fleurbaey, M. 2007. Social Choice and Just Institutions: New Perspectives. Economics and Philosophy 23, 15–43.Google Scholar

Fleurbaey, M. 2009. Beyond GDP: The Quest for a Measure of Social Welfare. Journal of Economic Literature 47(4), 1029–1075.Google Scholar

Fleurbaey, M. and Blanchet, D. 2013. Measuring Welfare and Assessing Sustainability. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Fleurbaey, M. and Mongin, P. 2005. The News of the Death of Welfare Economics Is Greatly Exaggerated. Social Choice and Welfare 25(2), 381–418.Google Scholar

Hicks, J. R. 1939. The Foundations of Welfare Economics. Economic Journal 49(196), 696–712.Google Scholar

Igersheim, H. 2019. The Death of Welfare Economics: History of a Controversy. History of Political Economy 51(5), 827–865.Google Scholar

Mishan, E. J. 1960. A Survey of Welfare Economics, 1939–59. Economic Journal 70(278), 197–265.Google Scholar

Mongin, P. 2006. Value Judgments and Value Neutrality in Economics. Economica 72(290), 257–286.Google Scholar

Putnam, H. 2002. The Collapse of the Fact/Value Dichotomy and Other Essays. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Robbins, L. 1932. An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science, 2nd. ed. 1935, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Sen, A. K. 2004. L’économie est une science morale. Paris: La Découverte, Poche.Google Scholar