We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 August 2010
SUMMARY
The relationship between orchard transpiration estimated by a meteorological model or by sap flow in the trunk and canopy conductance was studied in a 17-year-old ‘grapefruit’ orchard. Low values of canopy conductance during most times of the day are related to the low ratio of potential to actual transpiration in this orchard. High transpiration rate was sustained even when canopy conductance was low, suggesting an important role of atmospheric evaporative demand on transpiration. Under limited soil water availability canopy conductance reached extremely low values, which resulted in reduced transpiration rate. Hourly actual transpiration rates, computed by the model, were well correlated with hourly rates of sap flow in the trunk.
INTRODUCTION
The ratio of actual (Tr) to potential (PTr) transpiration is less than unity because the leaf epidermis offers a resistance to water vapour flow. In a “Marsh” grapefruit {Citrus paradisiMacf.) orchard, the ratio was found to be relatively small (0.3) when soil water availability was not limited but it dropped to 0.2 when the soil dried out to about -80 kPa in the main root zone (Cohen, 1991). In the computation of potential transpiration, using a meteorological model, the resistance of the canopy to vapour diffusion is considered zero and this explains the above ratio of measured to potential transpiration. Numerous field and laboratory measurements of stomata have shown the relationship between transpiration and stomatal conductance (Hall & Schulze, 1982). On the other hand, several micrometeorological models have been used successfully to predict evapotranspiration for non-water-stressed vegetation without taking into account the stomatal characteristics (Kanemasu, Stone & Powers, 1976; Ritchie & Jordan, 1972).
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.
