Book contents
- War, States, and International Order
- Cambridge Studies in International Relations: 159
- War, States, and International Order
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Epigraph
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- 1 Context, Reception, and the Study of Great Thinkers in International Relations
- Part I Gentili’s De iure belli in Its Original Context
- Part II Gentili’s De iure belli and the Myth of “Modern War”
- Bibliography
- Index
- Cambridge Studies in International Relations
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 July 2022
Book contents
- War, States, and International Order
- Cambridge Studies in International Relations: 159
- War, States, and International Order
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Epigraph
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- 1 Context, Reception, and the Study of Great Thinkers in International Relations
- Part I Gentili’s De iure belli in Its Original Context
- Part II Gentili’s De iure belli and the Myth of “Modern War”
- Bibliography
- Index
- Cambridge Studies in International Relations
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- War, States, and International OrderAlberico Gentili and the Foundational Myth of the Laws of War, pp. 262 - 292Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022
References
Acharya, Amitav. “Global International Relations (IR) and Regional Worlds.” International Studies Quarterly 58, no. 4 (2014): 647–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, Amanda. “A Short History of International Humanitarian Law.” European Journal of International Law 26, no. 1 (2015): 109–38.Google Scholar
Alexandrowicz, Charles Henry. The European–African Confrontation: A Study in Treaty Making. Leiden: Sijthoff, 1973.Google Scholar
Alexandrowicz, Charles Henry. “Introduction.” In Van der Molen, Gesina H. J., Alberico Gentili and the Development of International Law: His Life, Work and Times. Leiden: Albertus Willem Sijthoff, 1968.Google Scholar
Alexandrowicz, Charles Henry. An Introduction to the History of the Law of Nations in the East Indies (16th, 17th and 18th Centuries). Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Alexandrowicz, Charles Henry. The Law of Nations in Global History, edited by Pitts, Jennifer and Armitage, David. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alfert, Robert. “Hostes Humani Generis: An Expanded Notion of US Counterterrorist Legislation.” Emory International Law Review 6, no. 1 (1992): 171–214.Google Scholar
Kai, Ambos. “The New Enemy of Mankind: The Jurisdiction of the ICC over Members of ‘Islamic State’.” EJIL: Talk!, November 26, 2015.Google Scholar
Amorosa, Paolo. Rewriting the History of the Law of Nations: How James Brown Scott Made Francisco de Vitoria the Founder of International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anghie, Antony. “Colonialism and the Birth of International Institutions: Sovereignty, Economy, and the Mandate System of the League of Nations.” NYU Journal of International Law and Politics 34, no. 3 (2001): 513–633.Google Scholar
Anghie, Antony. “Finding the Peripheries: Sovereignty and Colonialism in Nineteenth-Century International Law.” Harvard International Law Journal 40, no. 1 (1999): 1–80.Google Scholar
Anglim, Simon. “Callwell versus Graziani: How the British Army Applied ‘Small Wars’ Techniques in Major Operations in Africa and the Middle East, 1940–41.” Small Wars & Insurgencies 19, no. 4 (2008): 588–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Summa Theologiae: Existence and Nature of God. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Armigero Gazzera, Ermelinda. Alberico Gentili: Bibliografia. Tolentino: Francesco Filelfo, 1917.Google Scholar
Armitage, David. “The Fifty Years Rift: Intellectual History and International Relations.” Modern Intellectual History 1, no. 1 (2004): 97–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armitage, David. Foundations of Modern International Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armitage, David. The Ideological Origins of the British Empire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armitage, David. “What’s the Big Idea? Intellectual History and the Longue Durée.” History of European Ideas 38, no. 4 (2012): 493–507.Google Scholar
Armitage, David, and Guldi, Jo. “The Return of the Longue Durée: An Anglo-American Perspective.” Victoria 70, no. 2 (2014): 219–47.Google Scholar
Asser, Tobias Michael Carel. “Alberigo Gentili.” Algemeen Handelsblad, February 6, 1877.Google Scholar
Ayala, Balthazar. De jure et officiis bellicis et disciplina militari libri tres. Washington, DC: Carnegie Institution of Washington, 1912.Google Scholar
Bain, William. “Grotius in International Relations Theory.” In The Cambridge Companion to Hugo Grotius, edited by Lesaffer, Randall and Nijman, Janne E., 597–618. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021.Google Scholar
Bain, William, ed. Medieval Foundations of International Relations. London: Routledge, 2016.Google Scholar
Bain, William. Political Theology of International Order. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bain, William, and Nardin, Terry. “International Relations and Intellectual History.” International Relations 31, no. 3 (2017): 213–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balakrishnan, Gopal. The Enemy: An Intellectual Portrait of Carl Schmitt. London: Verso, 2000.Google Scholar
Balch, Thomas Willing. “Albericus Gentilis.” The American Journal of International Law 5, no. 3 (1911): 665–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balch, Thomas Willing. “Letter from Thomas Balch to Thomas Erskine Holland,” Papers relating to Albericus Gentilis, held at the Bodleian Library, University of Oxford, October 27, 1911.Google Scholar
Balibar, Etienne. “What’s in a War? (Politics as War, War as Politics).” Ratio Juris 21, no. 3 (2008): 365–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banks, William. Counterinsurgency Law: New Directions in Asymmetric Warfare. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Bann, Stephen. Romanticism and the Rise of History. New York: Twayne Publishers, 1995.Google Scholar
Barducci, Marco. Hugo Grotius and the Century of Revolution, 1613–1718: Transnational Reception in English Political Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Barkawi, Tarak. “Decolonising War.” European Journal of International Security 1, no. 2 (2016): 199–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barkawi, Tarak, and Brighton, Shane. “Conclusion: Absent War Studies? War, Knowledge and Critique.” In The Changing Character of War, edited by Strachan, Hew and Scheipers, Sibylle, 524–42. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Barkawi, Tarak, and Brighton, Shane. “Powers of War: Fighting, Knowledge, and Critique.” International Political Sociology 5, no. 2 (2011): 126–43.Google Scholar
Bartelson, Jens. War in International Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baxter, Richard. Humanizing the Laws of War: Selected Writings of Richard Baxter, edited by Vagts, Detlev F., Meron, Theodor, Schwebel, Stephen M., and Keever, Charles. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Bayly, Christopher Alan. The Birth of the Modern World, 1780–1914: Global Connections and Comparisons. Oxford: Blackwell, 2004.Google Scholar
Beaulac, Stéphane. “The Westphalian Model in Defining International Law: Challenging the Myth.” Australian Journal of Legal History 8, no. 2 (2004): 181–213.Google Scholar
Bell, Duncan. “Empire and International Relations in Victorian Political Thought.” The Historical Journal 49, no. 1 (2006): 281–98.Google Scholar
Bell, Duncan. “International Relations: The Dawn of a Historiographical Turn?” British Journal of Politics & International Relations 3, no. 1 (2001): 115–26.Google Scholar
Bell, Duncan. “Language, Legitimacy, and the Project of Critique.” Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 27, no. 3 (2002): 327–50.Google Scholar
Bell, Duncan. “Political Realism and International Relations.” Philosophy Compass 12, no. 2 (2017): 1–12.Google Scholar
Bell, Duncan. “Political Theory and the Functions of Intellectual History: A Response to Emmanuel Navon.” Review of International Studies 29, no. 1 (2003): 151–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bendersky, Joseph W. Carl Schmitt, Theorist for the Reich. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benton, Lauren. “Beyond Anachronism: Histories of International Law and Global Legal Politics.” Journal of the History of International Law/Revue d’histoire du droit international 21, no. 1 (2019): 7–40.Google Scholar
Benton, Lauren. A Search for Sovereignty: Law and Geography in European Empires, 1400–1900. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benton, Lauren, and Ford, Lisa. Rage for Order: The British Empire and the Origins of International Law 1800–1850. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Berdal, Mats. “The ‘New Wars’ Thesis Revisited.” In The Changing Character of War, edited by Strachan, Hew and Scheipers, Sibylle, 109–33. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Bernstorff, Jochen von. “The Battle for the Recognition of Wars of National Liberation.” In The Battle for International Law: South–North Perspectives on the Decolonization Era, edited by Dann, Philipp and von Bernstorff, Jochen, 52–70. New York: Oxford University Press, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstorff, Jochen von. “The Use of Force in International Law before World War I: On Imperial Ordering and the Ontology of the Nation-State.” European Journal of International Law 29, no. 1 (2018): 233–60.Google Scholar
Best, Geoffrey. Humanity in Warfare: The Modern History of the International Law of Armed Conflicts. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1980.Google Scholar
Bevir, Mark. “The Contextual Approach.” In The Oxford Handbook of the History of Political Philosophy, edited by Klosko, George, 11–25. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Bevir, Mark. “Contextualism: From Modernist Method to Post-Analytic Historicism?” Journal of the Philosophy of History 3, no. 3 (2009): 211–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bevir, Mark. The Logic of the History of Ideas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Bhuta, Nehal. “State Theory, State Order, State System: Jus Gentium and the Constitution of Public Power.” In System, Order, and International Law: The Early History of International Legal Thought from Machiavelli to Hegel, edited by Kadelbach, Stefan, Kleinlein, Thomas, and Roth-Isigkeit, David, 398–417. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Binns, J. W. Intellectual Culture in Elizabethan and Jacobean England: The Latin Writings of the Age. Leeds: Francis Cairns, 1990.Google Scholar
Black, Cyril E. Neutralization and World Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Blane, Alexis, and Kingsbury, Benedict. “Punishment and the ius post bellum.” In The Roman Foundations of the Law of Nations, edited by Kingsbury, Benedict and Straumann, Benjamin, 241–67. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Bodin, Jean. On Sovereignty: Four Chapters from the Six Books of the Commonwealth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Bodin, Jean. Six Books of the Commonwealth. Translated by Michael J. Tooley. Oxford: Blackwell’s Political Texts, 1955.Google Scholar
Borschberg, Peter. “The Seizure of the Sta. Catarina Revisited: The Portuguese Empire in Asia, VOC Politics and the Origins of the Dutch–Johor Alliance (1602–c.1616).” Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 33, no. 1 (2002): 31–62.Google Scholar
Botting, Eileen Hunt, and Zlioba, Ariana. “Religion and Women’s Rights: Susan Moller Okin, Mary Wollstonecraft, and the Multiple Feminist Liberal Traditions.” History of European Ideas 44, no. 8 (2018): 1169–88.Google Scholar
Boucher, David. Appropriating Hobbes: Legacies in Political, Legal, and International Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Bourke, Richard, and Skinner, Quentin. Popular Sovereignty in Historical Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Branch, Jordan. The Cartographic State: Maps, Territory and the Origins of Sovereignty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Brazil, Lia. “British War Office Manuals and International Law, 1899–1907.” In Empire and Legal Thought: Ideas and Institutions from Antiquity to Modernity, edited by Cavanagh, Edward, 548–77. Leiden: Brill Nijhoff, 2020.Google Scholar
Brown, Chris. “Political Thought, International Relations Theory and International Political Theory: An Interpretation.” International Relations 31, no. 3 (2017): 227–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brownlie, Ian. International Law and the Use of Force by States. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1963.Google Scholar
Bull, Hedley. The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2002.Google Scholar
Bull, Hedley. “The Grotian Conception of International Society.” In Diplomatic Investigations: Essays in the Theory of International Politics, edited by Butterfield, Herbert and Wight, Martin. London: Allen & Unwin, 1966.Google Scholar
Bullen, Barrie. “Walter Pater’s ‘Renaissance’ and Leonardo da Vinci’s Reputation in the Nineteenth Century.” The Modern Language Review 74, no. 2 (1979): 268–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgess, Douglas R. Jr. “Hostis Humani Generi: Piracy, Terrorism and a New International Law.” University of Miami International & Comparative Law Review 13, no. 2 (2005): 293.Google Scholar
Burgess, Glenn. Absolute Monarchy and the Stuart Constitution. London: Yale University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Burgess, Glenn. “Bodin in the English Revolution.” In The Reception of Bodin, edited by Lloyd, Howell A., 387–408. Leiden: Brill, 2013.Google Scholar
Burke, Martin J., and Richter, Melvin. Why Concepts Matter: Translating Social and Political Thought. Leiden: Brill, 2012.Google Scholar
Burke, Peter. The Fortunes of the Courtier: The European Reception of Castiglione’s Cortegiano. University Park, PA: Penn State Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Burke, Peter. “The History and Theory of Reception.” In The Reception of Bodin, edited by Lloyd, Howell A., 21–38. Leiden: Brill, 2013.Google Scholar
Burke, Peter. “Tacitism, Scepticism, and Reason of State.” In The Cambridge History of Political Thought, 1450–1700, edited by Burns, James H. and Goldie, Mark, 477–98. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry. “The English School: A Neglected Approach to International Security Studies.” Security Dialogue 46, no. 2 (2015): 126–43.Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry, and Lawson, George. The Global Transformation: History, Modernity and the Making of International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry, and Lawson, George. “Rethinking Benchmark Dates in International Relations.” European Journal of International Relations 20, no. 2 (2014): 437–62.Google Scholar
Callwell, Charles Edward. Small Wars: Their Principles and Practice. London: HM Stationery Office, 1903.Google Scholar
Canning, Joseph. “The Medieval Roman and Canon Law Origins of International Law.” In Medieval Foundations of International Relations, edited by Bain, William, 102–16. Abingdon: Routledge, 2016.Google Scholar
Carlyle, Thomas. On Heroes, Hero-Worship, and the Heroic in History. London: Chapman and Hall, 1840.Google Scholar
Carvalho, Benjamin de, Leira, Halvard, and Hobson, John M.. “The Big Bangs of IR: The Myths That Your Teachers Still Tell You about 1648 and 1919.” Millennium–Journal of International Studies 39, no. 3 (2011): 735–58.Google Scholar
Cassese, Antonio. “States: Rise and Decline of the Primary Subjects of the International Community.” In The Oxford Handbook of the History of International Law, edited by Fassbender, Bardo and Peters, Anne, 49–70. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Cavanagh, Edward. “A Company with Sovereignty and Subjects of Its Own? The Case of the Hudson’s Bay Company, 1670–1763.” Canadian Journal of Law & Society/La Revue Canadienne Droit et Société 26, no. 1 (2011): 25–50.Google Scholar
Chakrabarty, Dipesh. Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Chandler, David. “The Revival of Carl Schmitt in International Relations: The Last Refuge of Critical Theorists?” Millennium 37, no. 1 (2008): 27–48.Google Scholar
Chernilo, Daniel. “The Critique of Methodological Nationalism: Theory and History.” Thesis Eleven 106, no. 1 (2011): 98–117.Google Scholar
Church, William. “The Decline of the French Jurists as Political Theorists, 1660–1789.” French Historical Studies 5, no. 1 (1967): 1–40.Google Scholar
Church, William. Richelieu and Reason of State. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1972.Google Scholar
Colás, Alejandro, and Mabee, Bryan, eds. Mercenaries, Pirates, Bandits and Empires: Private Violence in Historical Context. New York: Columbia University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Cole, Laurence. Different Paths to the Nation: Regional and National Identities in Central Europe and Italy, 1830–70. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collini, Stefan. “What Is Intellectual History?” History Today, October 1985. www.historytoday.com/stefan-collini/what-intellectual-history.Google Scholar
Comparato, Vittor Ivo, and Quaglioni, Diego. “From Machiavellism to the End of the Seventeenth Century.” In European Political Thought, 1450–1700: Religion, Law and Philosophy, edited by Lloyd, Howell A., Burgess, Glenn, and Hodson, Simon, 55–101. London: Yale University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Cosgrove, Richard. “Holland, Sir Thomas Erskine (1835–1926).” In Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (online ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/ref:odnb/33944.Google Scholar
Costa Lopez, Julia. “International Relations in/and the Middle Ages.” In The Routledge Handbook of Historical International Relations, edited by Lopez, Julia Costa, Leira, Halvard, and de Carvalho, Benjamin, 408–18. Abingdon: Routledge, 2021.Google Scholar
Costa Lopez, Julia, de Carvalho, Benjamin, Latham, Andrew A., Zarakol, Ayse, Bartelson, Jens, and Holm, Minda. “In the Beginning There Was No Word (for It): Terms, Concepts, and Early Sovereignty.” International Studies Review 20, no. 3 (2018): 489–519.Google Scholar
Craven, Matthew. “Between Law and History: The Berlin Conference of 1884–1885 and the Logic of Free Trade.” London Review of International Law 3, no. 1 (2015): 31–59.Google Scholar
Craven, Matthew. “Colonialism and Domination.” In The Oxford Handbook of the History of International Law, edited by Fassbender, Bardo and Peters, Anne, 862–89. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Craven, Matthew. “The Invention of a Tradition: Westlake, The Berlin Conference and the Historicisation of International Law.” In Constructing International Law: The Birth of a Discipline, edited by Nuzzo, Luigi and Vec, Miloš, 363–403. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 2012.Google Scholar
Craven, Matthew “Theorizing the Turn to History in International Law.” In The Oxford Handbook of the Theory of International Law, edited by Orford, Anne and Hoffmann, Florian, 21–37. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Davis, Kathleen. Periodization and Sovereignty: How Ideas of Feudalism and Secularization Govern the Politics of Time. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Deruelle, Benjamin. “The Sixteenth-Century Antecedents of Special Operations ‘Small War’.” Small Wars & Insurgencies 25, no. 4 (2014): 754–66.Google Scholar
Devetak, Richard. “‘The Battle Is All There Is’: Philosophy and History in International Relations Theory.” International Relations 31, no. 3 (August 8, 2017): 261–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devetak, Richard. “Historiographical Foundations of Modern International Thought: Histories of the European States-System from Florence to Göttingen.” History of European Ideas 41 (2014): 1–16.Google Scholar
Devetak, Richard. “A Rival Enlightenment? Critical International Theory in Historical Mode.” International Theory 6, no. 3 (2014): 417–53.Google Scholar
Digelmann, Oliver. “The Periodization of the History of International Law.” In The Oxford Handbook of the History of International Law, edited by Fassbender, Bardo and Peters, Anne, 997–1011. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Doe, Norman. “Phillimore, Sir Robert Joseph, Baronet (1810–1885).” In Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (online ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/ref:odnb/33944Google Scholar
Domingo, Rafael, and Minnucci, Giovanni. “Alberico Gentili and the Secularization of the Law of Nations.” In Christianity and Global Law, edited by Rafael Domingo and John Witte, Jr., 98–111. Abingdon: Routledge, 2020.Google Scholar
Doran, Robert. “Editor’s Introduction: Choosing the Past: Hayden White and the Philosophy of History.” In Philosophy of History after Hayden White, edited by Doran, Robert, 1–34. New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doyle, Michael. Ways of War and Peace: Realism, Liberalism, and Socialism. New York: W. W. Norton, 1998.Google Scholar
Dumont, Jean. Corps universel diplomatique du droit des gens, contenant un recueil des traitez d’alliance, de paix, de trêve, de neutralité, de commerce, etc., qui ont été faits en Europe, depuis le règne de l’empereur Charlemagne jusques à présent. Amsterdam: P. Brunel, R. and J. Wetstein, and G. Smith, Henri Waesberge, and Z. Chatelain, 1726.Google Scholar
Dunn, John. The History of Political Theory and Other Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Dunne, Timothy. “Mythology or Methodology? Traditions in International Theory.” Review of International Studies 19, no. 3 (1993): 305–18.Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, David. Legality and Legitimacy: Carl Schmitt, Hans Kelsen and Hermann Heller in Weimar. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Easley, Eric S. The War over Perpetual Peace: An Exploration into the History of a Foundational International Relations Text. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004.Google Scholar
Edelstein, Daniel. “Hostis Humani Generis: Devils, Natural Right, and Terror in the French Revolution.” Telos 2007, no. 141 (2007): 57–81.Google Scholar
Edmonds, James E. Land Warfare: An Exposition of the Laws and Usages of War on Land, for the Guidance of Officers of His Majesty’s Army. London: HM Stationery Office, 1912.Google Scholar
Engster, Daniel. “Jean Bodin, Scepticism and Absolute Sovereignty.” History of Political Thought 17, no. 4 (1996): 469–99.Google Scholar
Fabre, Cécile. “In Defence of Mercenarism.” British Journal of Political Science 40, no. 3 (2010): 539–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farneti, Roberto. Il canone moderno. Filosofia politica e genealogia. Turin: Bollati Boringhieri, 2002.Google Scholar
Fassbender, Bardo. “Carl Schmitt (1888–1985).” In The Oxford Handbook of the History of International Law, edited by Fassbender, Bardo and Peters, Anne, 1173–78. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Fassbender, Bardo. “Stories of War and Peace: On Writing the History of International Law in the Third Reich and After.” European Journal of International Law 13, no. 2 (2002): 479–512.Google Scholar
Fauchille, Paul. Traité de droit international public. Edited by Bonfils, Henri. Paris: Rousseau, 1898.Google Scholar
Fawcett, Louise. “Between West and Non-West: Latin American Contributions to International Thought.” The International History Review 34, no. 4 (2012): 679–704.Google Scholar
Field, Dudley. “De la possibilité d’appliquer le droit international européen aux nations orientales.” Revue de droit international et de législation comparée 7 (1875): 293–94.Google Scholar
Fiocchi Malaspina, Elisabetta. “Le droit des gens di Emer de Vattel: La genesi di un successo editoriale secolare.” Nuova Rivista Storica 98, no. 2 (2014): 733–54.Google Scholar
Fiocchi Malaspina, Elisabetta. “Emer de Vattel’s ‘Le droit des gens’: Its Circulation and Reception in the 19th Century.” Materiali per una storia della cultura giuridica 43, no. 2 (2013): 303–20.Google Scholar
Fiocchi Malaspina, Elisabetta, and Keller-Kemmerer, Nina. “International Law and Translation in the 19th Century.” Rechtsgeschichte-Legal History 22 (2014): 214–26.Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, Andrew. “Context in the History of International Law.” Journal of the History of International Law/Revue d’histoire du droit international 20, no. 1 (2018): 5–30.Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, Andrew. “Equality between European and Non-European Nations in International Law.” In International Law in the Long Nineteenth Century, edited by van Hulle, Inge and Lesaffer, Randall, 75–104. Leiden: Brill Nijhoff, 2019.Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, Andrew. Humanism and America: An Intellectual History of English Colonisation, 1500–1625. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzmaurice, Andrew. King Leopold’s Ghostwriter: The Creation of Persons and States in the Nineteenth Century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2021.Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, Andrew. “Liberalism and Empire in Nineteenth Century International Law.” The American Historical Review 117, no. 1 (2012): 122–40.Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, Andrew. “The Resilience of Natural Law in the Writings of Sir Travers Twiss.” In British International Thinkers from Hobbes to Namier, edited by Hall, Ian and Hill, Lisa, 137–59. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, Andrew. Sovereignty, Property and Empire, 1500–2000. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Foisneau, Luc. “Security as a Norm in Hobbes’s Theory of War: A Critique of Schmitt’s Interpretation of Hobbes’s Approach to International Relations.” In War, the State and International Law in Seventeenth-Century Europe, edited by Schröder, Peter and Asbach, Olaf, 163–80. Farnham: Routledge, 2017.Google Scholar
Fonck, Bertrand, and Satterfield, George. “The Essence of War: French Armies and Small War in the Low Countries (1672–1697).” Small Wars & Insurgencies 25, no. 4 (2014): 767–83.Google Scholar
Forst, Rainer. Toleration in Conflict: Past and Present. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Forsyth, Murray Greensmith, Keens-Soper, Maurice H. A., and Savigear, Peter. The Theory of International Relations: Selected Texts from Gentili to Treitschke. London: Allen & Unwin, 1970.Google Scholar
Franklin, Julian H. Jean Bodin and the Rise of Absolutist Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Franklin, Julian H. Jean Bodin and the Sixteenth-Century Revolution in the Methodology of Law and History. London: Columbia University Press, 1963.Google Scholar
Franklin, Julian H. “Sovereignty and the Mixed Constitution: Bodin and His Critics.” In The Cambridge History of Political Thought, 1450–1700, edited by Burns, James H. and Goldie, Mark, 298–323. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Freeden, Michael. Ideologies and Political Theory: A Conceptual Approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Fulgosius, Raphaël. “Just War Reduced to Public War.” In The Ethics of War: Classic and Contemporary Readings, edited by Reichberg, Gregory M., Syse, Henrik, and Begby, Endre, 227–30. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2006.Google Scholar
Garibian, Sévane. “Hostes Humani Generis: Les pirates vus par le droit.” Critique, no. 6 (2008): 470–79.Google Scholar
Garnsey, Peter. Thinking about Property: From Antiquity to the Age of Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Genin, Vincent. “The Institute of International Law’s Crisis in the Wake of the Franco-Prussian War (1873–1899).” In International Law in the Long Nineteenth Century, edited by van Hulle, Inge and Lesaffer, Randall, 214–32. Leiden: Brill Nijhoff, 2019.Google Scholar
Gentili, Alberico. Il diritto di guerra (de iure belli libri III, 1598). Edited by Marchetto, G. and Zendri, C., translated by P. Nencini, with an introduction by Diego Quaglioni. Milan: A. Giuffrè, 2008.Google Scholar
Gentili, Alberico. De iure belli libri tres. Edited by Scott, James Brown, translated by John Carew Rolfe, with an introduction by Coleman Phillipson. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1933.Google Scholar
Gentili, Alberico. Lectionum et Epistolarum quæ ad ius civile pertinent Libri I–IV. Londini: Iohannes Wolfius, 1583.Google Scholar
Gentili, Alberico. De legationibus libri tres. Edited by Scott, James Brown, translated by Gordon J. Laing, with an introduction by Ernest Nys. New York: Oxford University Press, 1924.Google Scholar
Gentili, Alberico. Regales disputationes tres: id est, de potestate regis absoluta. De vnione regnorum Britanniæ. De vi ciuium in regem semper iniusta. Hanau: W. Antonius, 1605.Google Scholar
Gentili, Alberico. The Wars of the Romans: A Critical Edition and Translation of De armis romanis. Edited by Kingsbury, Benedict and Straumann, Benjamin, translated by David A. Lupher. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Giesey, Ralph E. “Medieval Jurisprudence in Bodin’s Concept of Sovereignty.” In Jean Bodin, edited by Franklin, Julian H., 105–22. Abingdon: Routledge, 2006.Google Scholar
Giladi, Rotem. “Francis Lieber on Public War.” Goettingen Journal of International Law 4 (2012): 447–77.Google Scholar
Glafey, Adam Friedrich. Vollständige Geschichte des Rechts der Vernunft. Leipzig: Neudruck der Ausgabe, 1739.Google Scholar
Goldie, Mark. The Reception of Locke’s Politics: From the 1690’s to the 1830’s. London: Pickering & Chatto, 1999.Google Scholar
Gong, Gerrit. The Standard of Civilization in International Society. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Gould, Harry. “Cicero’s Ghost: Rethinking the Social Construction of Piracy.” In Maritime Piracy and the Construction of Global Governance, edited by Struett, Michael J., Carlson, Jon D., and Nance, Mark T., 23–46. Abingdon: Routledge, 2012.Google Scholar
Greenwood, Christopher. “International Law and the ‘War against Terrorism’.” International Affairs 78, no. 2 (2002): 301–17.Google Scholar
Grewe, Wilhelm Georg. The Epochs of International Law. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2000.Google Scholar
Grimm, Gunter. Rezeptionsgeschichte: Grundlegung einer Theorie: mit Analysen und Bibliographie. Munich: WFink, 1977.Google Scholar
Grosjean, Blandine. “La « guerre d’Algérie » reconnue à l’assemblée. Les députés adoptent la proposition de loi officialisant cette expression.” Libération, June 1999. www.liberation.fr/france/1999/06/11/la-guerre-d-algerie-reconnue-a-l-assemblee-les-deputes-adoptent-la-proposition-de-loi-officialisant-277134.Google Scholar
Gross, Leo. “The Peace of Westphalia, 1648–1948.” American Journal of International Law 42, no. 1 (1948): 20–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grotius, Hugo. De iure belli ac pacis libri tres. Edited and with an introduction by Scott, James Brown, translated by Francis Kelsey with the collaboration of Boak, Sanders, Reeves and Wright. New York: Oceana, 1964.Google Scholar
Grotius, Hugo. The Rights of War and Peace. Edited and with an introduction by Tuck, Richard, from the edition by Jean Barbeyrac. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund, 2005.Google Scholar
Guicciardini, Francesco. Dialogue on the Government of Florence. Translated by Alison Brown. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Guilhot, Nicolas. “The First Modern Realist: Felix Gilbert’s Machiavelli and the Realist Tradition in International Thought.” Modern Intellectual History 13, no. 3 (2016): 681–711.Google Scholar
Guilhot, Nicolas. The Invention of International Relations Theory: Realism, the Rockefeller Foundation, and the 1954 Conference on Theory. New York: Columbia University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Guillaume, Xavier. “Historical Periods and the Act of Periodization.” In The Routledge Handbook of Historical International Relations, edited by Lopez, Julia Costa, Leira, Halvard, and de Carvalho, Benjamin, 562–70. Abingdon: Routledge, 2021.Google Scholar
Guldi, Jo, and Armitage, David. The History Manifesto. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Haggenmacher, Peter. “Il diritto della guerra et della pace di Alberico Gentili.” In Atti del convegno quarta giornata gentiliana 21 settembre 1991. Milan: A. Giuffrè, 1995.Google Scholar
Haggenmacher, Peter. “Grotius and Gentili: A Reassessment of Thomas E. Holland’s Inaugural Lecture.” In Hugo Grotius and International Relations, edited by Bull, Hedley, Kingsbury, Benedict, and Roberts, Adam, 133–76. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Haggenmacher, Peter. Grotius et la doctrine de la guerre juste. Paris: Presses universitaires de France, 1983.Google Scholar
Haggenmacher, Peter. “La place de Francisco de Vitoria parmi les fondateurs du droit international.” In Actualité de la pensée juridique de Francisco de Vitoria: Travaux de la journée d’études organisée à Louvain-La-Neuve par le centre Charles de Visscher, edited by Truyol y Serra, Antonio, Mechoulan, Henry, Ortiz-Arce, Antonio, Marino, Primitivo, Haggenmacher, Peter, and Verhoeven, Joe, 27–36. Bruxelles: Bruylant, 1988.Google Scholar
Haggenmacher, Peter. “Préface.” In Le nomos de la terre, by Schmitt, Carl. Paris: Presses universitaires de France, 2012.Google Scholar
Hall, Ian. “The History of International Thought and International Relations Theory: From Context to Interpretation.” International Relations 31, no. 3 (2017): 241–60.Google Scholar
Hall, Ian, and Bevir, Mark. “Traditions of British International Thought.” The International History Review 36, no. 5 (2014): 823–34.Google Scholar
Hallam, Henry. Introduction to the Literature of Europe in the Fifteenth, Sixteenth, and Seventeenth Centuries. Paris: John Murray, 1839.Google Scholar
Hansen, Peo, and Jonsson, Stefan. “Building Eurafrica: Reviving Colonialism through European Integration, 1920–1960.” In Echoes of Empire: Memory, Identity and Colonial Legacies, edited by Nicolaïdis, Kalypso, Sèbe, Berny, and Maas, Gabi. London: I.B. Tauris, 2014.Google Scholar
Heeren, Arnold Hermann Ludwig. A Manual of the History of the Political System of Europe and Its Colonies: From Its Formation at the Close of the Fifteenth Century, to Its Re-Establishment upon the Fall of Napoleon. Oxford: DA Talboys, 1834.Google Scholar
Heller-Roazen, Daniel. The Enemy of All: Piracy and the Law of Nations. New York: Zone Books, 2009.Google Scholar
Henshall, Nicholas. The Myth of Absolutism: Change and Continuity in Early Modern European Monarchy. London: Longman, 1992.Google Scholar
Heuser, Beatrice. “Misleading Paradigms of War: States and Non-State Actors, Combatants and Non-Combatants.” War & Society 27, no. 2 (2008): 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heuser, Beatrice. “Small Wars in the Age of Clausewitz: The Watershed Between Partisan War and People’s War.” The Journal of Strategic Studies 33, no. 1 (2010): 139–62.Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, Eric, and Ranger, Terence. The Invention of Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Hochstrasser, T. J. Natural Law Theories in the Early Enlightenment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Hoekstra, Kinch. “Hobbes’s Thucydides.” In The Oxford Handbook of Hobbes, edited by Martinich, Aloysius and Hoekstra, Kinch, 547–74. New York: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Holden, Gerard. “Who Contextualizes the Contextualizers: Disciplinary History and the Discourse about IR Discourse.” Review of International Studies 28, no. 2 (2002): 253–70.Google Scholar
Holland, Thomas Erskine. “The Early Literature on the Law of War.” In Studies in International Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1879, 40–58.Google Scholar
Holland, Thomas Erskine. An Inaugural Lecture on Albericus Gentilis, Delivered at All Souls College, November 7, 1874. London: Macmillan, 1874.Google Scholar
Holland, Thomas Erskine. The Laws of War on Land (Written and Unwritten). Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1908.Google Scholar
Holland, Thomas Erskine. “Lecture XIX: War. Measures of: Operations by Dolus.” In Lectures on International Law, edited by Walker, Thomas Alfred and Walker, Wyndham Legh, 286–98. London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1933.Google Scholar
Holland, Thomas Erskine. “Lecture XVIII: War: Definition of and Effects of, in Lectures on International Law.” In Lectures on International Law, edited by Walker, Thomas Alfred and Walker, Wyndham Legh, 263–85. London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1933.Google Scholar
Holland, Thomas Erskine. “Preface.” In Alberico Gentili: Bibliografia, by Gazzera, Ermelinda Armigero. Tolentino: F. Filelfo, 1917.Google Scholar
Holland, Thomas Erskine. “Review: Commentaries upon International Law, by Sir Robert Phillimore.” Revue de droit international et de législation comparée 12 (1880): 246–47.Google Scholar
Holland, Thomas Erskine. A Valedictory Retrospect (1874–1910): Being a Lecture Delivered at All Souls College, June 17, 1910. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1910.Google Scholar
Holmqvist, Caroline. “Undoing War: War Ontologies and the Materiality of Drone Warfare.” Millennium Journal of International Studies 41, no. 3 (2013): 535–52.Google Scholar
Holsti, Kalevi. Peace and War: Armed Conflicts and International Order, 1648–1989. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Holsti, Kalevi. The State, War, and the State of War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Holsti, Kalevi. Taming the Sovereigns: Institutional Change in International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Holub, Robert. “Trends in Literary Theory: The American Reception of Reception Theory.” The German Quarterly 55, no. 1 (1982): 80–96.Google Scholar
Hooker, William. Carl Schmitt’s International Thought: Order and Orientation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Hopkins, A. G. “Overseas Expansion, Imperialism, and Empire 1815–1914.” In The Nineteenth Century: Europe 1789–1914, edited by Blanning, T. C. W., 210–40. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Howard, Michael, Andreopoulos, George J., and Shulman, Mark R., eds. The Laws of War: Constraints on Warfare in the Western World. London: Yale University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Hunter, Ian. “The History of Philosophy and the Persona of the Philosopher.” Modern Intellectual History 4, no. 3 (2007): 571–600.Google Scholar
Hutchings, Kimberly, Bartelson, Jens, Keene, Edward, Ypi, Lea, Kinsella, Helen M., and Armitage, David. “Critical Exchange: Foundations of Modern International Theory.” Contemporary Political Theory 13, no. 4 (2014): 387–418.Google Scholar
Ideville, Henry d. Le Maréchal Bugeaud, d’après sa correspondance intime et des documents inédits, 1784–1849. Paris: Librairie de Firmin-Didiot et Cie, 1882.Google Scholar
Ingham, Patricia Clare. “Review: Kathleen Davis. Periodization and Sovereignty: How Ideas of Feudalism and Secularization Govern the Politics of Time.” The American Historical Review 115, no. 5 (2010): 1436–38.Google Scholar
Iser, Wolfgang. Der Akt des Lesens: Theorie ästhetischer Wirkung. Munich: WFink, 1984.Google Scholar
Iurlaro, Francesca. The Invention of Custom: Natural Law and the Law of Nations, CA. 1550–1750. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iurlaro, Francesca. “Pirati, barbari e pastori: Tre figure al limite dell’humanitas nel pensiero di Alberico Gentili (1552–1608).” Historia et Ius 10 (2016): 1–11.Google Scholar
Jahn, Beate. The Cultural Construction of International Relations: The Invention of the State of Nature. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2000.Google Scholar
Jahn, Beate. “Introduction.” In Classical Theory in International Relations, edited by Jahn, Beate, 1–25. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Jauss, Hans Robert. Literaturgeschichte als Provokation. Erstausgabe. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1970.Google Scholar
Jeffery, Renée. Hugo Grotius in International Thought. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006.Google Scholar
Jeffery, Renée. “Tradition as Invention: The ‘Traditions Tradition’ and the History of Ideas in International Relations.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 34, no. 1 (2005): 57–84.Google Scholar
Johnson, James Turner. Ideology, Reason, and the Limitation of War. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Johnson, James Turner. Just War Tradition and the Restraint of War. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Johnston, David, Urbinati, Nadia, and Vergara, Camila, eds. Machiavelli on Liberty and Conflict. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Jouannet, Emmanuelle. The Liberal-Welfarist Law of Nations: A History of International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Kadelbach, Stefan, Kleinlein, Thomas, and Roth-Isigkeit, David. System, Order, and International Law: The Early History of International Legal Thought from Machiavelli to Hegel. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Kaldor, Mary. New and Old Wars: Organised Violence in a Global Era. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Kalyvas, Stathis. “The Changing Character of Civil Wars: 1800–2009.” In The Changing Character of War, edited by Strachan, Hew and Scheipers, Sibylle, 202–19. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Keene, Edward. Beyond the Anarchical Society: Grotius, Colonialism and Order in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Keene, Edward. “A Case Study of the Construction of International Hierarchy: British Treaty-Making against the Slave Trade in the Early Nineteenth Century.” International Organization 61, no. 02 (2007): 311–39.Google Scholar
Keene, Edward. “Images of Grotius.” In Classical Theory in International Relations, edited by Jahn, Beate, 233–52. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Keene, Edward. “International Intellectual History and International Relations: Contexts, Canons and Mediocrities.” International Relations 31, no. 3 (September 1, 2017): 341–56.Google Scholar
Keene, Edward. International Political Thought: A Historical Introduction. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Keene, Edward. “The Reception of Thucydides in the History of International Relations.” In A Handbook to the Reception of Thucydides, edited by Lee, Christine and Morley, Neville, 355–72. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell, 2015.Google Scholar
Keene, Edward. “The Standard of ‘Civilisation’, the Expansion Thesis and the 19th-Century International Social Space.” Millennium–Journal of International Studies 42, no. 3 (2014): 651–73.Google Scholar
Keene, Edward. “Three Traditions of International Theory.” In Guide to the English School in International Studies, edited by Navari, Cornelia and Green, Daniel, 171–83. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2013.Google Scholar
Keene, Edward. “The Treaty-Making Revolution of the Nineteenth Century.” The International History Review 34, no. 3 (2012): 475–500.Google Scholar
Kelley, Donald R. “The Development and Context of Bodin’s Method.” In Jean Bodin: Verhandlungen der internationalen Bodin-Tagung, edited by Denzer, Horst, 123–50. Munich: C. H. Beck, 1973.Google Scholar
Kelley, Donald R. Foundations of Modern Historical Scholarship: Language, Law, and History in the French Renaissance. London: Columbia University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Kelley, Donald R. “The Rise of Legal History in the Renaissance.” History and Theory 9, no. 2 (1970): 174–94.Google Scholar
Kelly, John M. A Short History of Western Legal Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Kingsbury, Benedict. “Confronting Difference: The Puzzling Durability of Gentili’s Combination of Pragmatic Pluralism and Normative Judgment.” American Journal of International Law 92, no. 4 (1998): 713–23.Google Scholar
Kingsbury, Benedict. “A Grotian Tradition of Theory and Practice: Grotius, Law, and Moral Skepticism in the Thought of Hedley Bull.” Quinnipac Law Review 17 (1997): 3–33.Google Scholar
Kingsbury, Benedict, and Straumann, Benjamin, eds. The Roman Foundations of the Law of Nations: Alberico Gentili and the Justice of Empire. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Klabbers, Jan. “Rebel with a Cause? Terrorists and Humanitarian Law.” European Journal of International Law 14, no. 2 (2003): 299–312.Google Scholar
Kloppenberg, James T. Toward Democracy: The Struggle for Self-Rule in European and American Thought. New York: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Knutsen, Torbjørn L. A History of International Relations Theory. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Koch, Christophe de. Histoire abrégée des traités de paix, entre les puissances de l’Europe, depuis la paix de Westphalie. Paris: Chez Gide fils, 1817.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti. “Carl Schmitt and International Law.” In The Oxford Handbook of Carl Schmitt, edited by Meierhenrich, Jens and Simons, Oliver, 592–611. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti. “Carl Schmitt, Hans Morgenthau, and the Image of Law in International Relations.” In The Role of Law in International Politics: Essays in International Relations and International Law, edited by Byers, Michael, 17–34. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti. “The Epochs of International Law.” International and Comparative Law Quarterly 51, no. 3 (2002): 746–51.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti. The Gentle Civilizer of Nations: The Rise and Fall of International Law 1870–1960. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti. “International Law and raison d’état: Rethinking the Prehistory of International Law.” In The Roman Foundations of the Law of Nations, edited by Kingsbury, Benedict and Straumann, Benjamin, 297–339. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti. “International Law as Political Theology: How to Read Nomos Der Erde?” Constellations 11, no. 4 (2004): 492–511.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti. “Law, Teleology and International Relations: An Essay in Counterdisciplinarity.” International Relations 26, no. 1 (2012): 3–34.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti. “Out of Europe: Carl Schmitt, Hans Morgenthau, and the Turn to ‘International Relations’.” In The Gentle Civilizer of Nations: The Rise and Fall of International Law 1870–1960, 413–509. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti. “Vitoria and Us.” Rechtsgeschichte–Legal History 22 (2014): 119–38.Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen. Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Lacchè, Luigi. “Monuments of International Law: Albericus Gentilis and Hugo Grotius in Constructing a Discipline (1875–1886).” In Constructing International Law: The Birth of a Discipline, edited by Nuzzo, Luigi and Vec, Miloš, 147–250. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 2012.Google Scholar
Lane, Melissa. “Doing Our Own Thinking for Ourselves: On Quentin Skinner’s Genealogical Turn.” Journal of the History of Ideas 73, no. 1 (2012): 71–82.Google Scholar
Latham, Andrew. “Political Theology of International Order: William Bain.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 33, no. 5 (2020): 814–16.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. Nous n’avons jamais été modernes: essai d’anthropologie symétrique. Paris: La découverte, 2013.Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, Hersch. “The Grotian Tradition in International Law.” British Yearbook of International Law 23 (1946): 1–53.Google Scholar
Le Goff, Jacques. Faut-il vraiment découper l’histoire en tranches? Paris: Le Seuil, 2014.Google Scholar
Learoyd, Arthur. “Configurations of Semi-Sovereignty in the Long-Nineteenth Century.” In De-Centering State Making: Comparative and International Perspectives, edited by Bartelson, Jens, Hall, Martin, and Teorell, Jan, 155–74. Cheltenham and Camberley: Edward Elgar, 2018.Google Scholar
Learoyd, Arthur. “Semi-Sovereignty and Relationships of Hierarchy.” D.Phil. Thesis, University of Oxford, 2017.Google Scholar
Lee, Christine, and Morley, Neville, eds. A Handbook to the Reception of Thucydides. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons, 2014.Google Scholar
Lee, Daniel. Popular Sovereignty in Early Modern Constitutional Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Lee, Daniel. The Right of Sovereignty: Jean Bodin on the Sovereign State and the Law of Nations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Hartmut, and Richter, Melvin, eds. The Meaning of Historical Terms and Concepts: New Studies on Begriffsgeschichte. Washington, DC: German Historical Institute, 1996.Google Scholar
Lemnitzer, Jan. Power, Law and the End of Privateering. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.Google Scholar
Lesaffer, Randall. “Alberico Gentili’s ius post bellum and Early Modern Peace Treaties.” In The Roman Foundations of the Law of Nations, edited by Kingsbury, Benedict and Straumann, Benjamin, 210–40. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Lesaffer, Randall. “The Classical Law of Nations (1500–1800).” In Research Handbook on the Theory and History of International Law, edited by Orakhelashvili, Alexander, 408–40. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2011.Google Scholar
Lesaffer, Randall. “The End of the Cold War as an Epochal Event in the History of International Law?” Tilburg Working Paper Series on Jurisprudence and Legal History 10 (2010): 1–25.Google Scholar
Lesaffer, Randall. Peace Treaties and International Law in European History: From the Late Middle Ages to World War One. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Lesaffer, Randall. “Peace Treaties and the Formation of International Law.” In The Oxford Handbook of the History of International Law, edited by Fassbender, Bardo and Peters, Anne, 71–93. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Levack, Brian. The Civil Lawyers in England, 1603–1641: A Political Study. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Levack, Brian. “Law and Ideology: The Civil Law and Theories of Absolutism in Elizabethan and Jacobean England.” In The Historical Renaissance: New Essays on Tudor and Stuart Literature and Culture, edited by Dubrow, Heather and Strier, Richard, 220–41. London: University of Chicago Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Li, Darryl. The Universal Enemy: Jihad, Empire, and the Challenge of Solidarity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Lifschitz, Avi. Engaging with Rousseau: Reaction and Interpretation from the Eighteenth Century to the Present. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Liu, Glory M. “Rethinking the ‘Chicago Smith’ Problem: Adam Smith and the Chicago School, 1929–1980.” Modern Intellectual History 17, no. 4 (2020): 1041–68.Google Scholar
Lobban, Michael. “English Approaches to International Law in the Nineteenth Century.” In Time, History and International Law, edited by Craven, Matthew, Fitzmaurice, Malgosia, and Vogiatzi, Maria, 65–90. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2007.Google Scholar
Lobban, Michael. “Twiss, Sir Travers (1809–1897).” In Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (online ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/ref:odnb/33944Google Scholar
Lopez, Julia Costa. “Political Authority in International Relations: Revisiting the Medieval Debate.” International Organization 74, no. 2 (2020): 222–52.Google Scholar
Lorenz, Chris, and Berger, Stefan. Nationalizing the Past: Historians as Nation Builders in Modern Europe. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.Google Scholar
Luard, Evan. War in International Society: A Study in International Sociology. London: Yale University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Luban, David. “A Theory of Crimes against Humanity.” Yale Journal of International Law 29 (2004): 85–167.Google Scholar
Lubell, Noam. Extraterritorial Use of Force against Non-State Actors. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Lupher, David. “The De armis romanis and the Exemplum of Roman Imperialism.” In The Roman Foundations of the Law of Nations: Alberico Gentili and the Justice of Empire, edited by Kingsbury, Benedict and Straumann, Benjamin, 85–100. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Macalister-Smith. “Bio-Bibliographical Key to the Membership of the Institut de droit international, 1873–2001.” Journal of the History of International Law 5, no. 1 (2003): 77–160.Google Scholar
Machiavelli, Niccolò. The Prince. Edited by Codevilla, Angelo. London: Yale University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
MacKay, Joseph, and LaRoche, Christopher David. “The Conduct of History in International Relations: Rethinking Philosophy of History in IR Theory.” International Theory 9, no. 2 (July 2017): 203–36.Google Scholar
Malcolm, Noel. “Alberico Gentili and the Ottomans.” In The Roman Foundations of the Law of Nations: Alberico Gentili and the Justice of Empire, edited by Kingsbury, Benedict and Straumann, Benjamin, 127–45. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Malcolm, Noel. “Hobbes’ Theory of International Relations.” In Aspects of Hobbes, edited by Malcolm, Noel, 433–55. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Malcolm, Noel. Useful Enemies: Islam and the Ottoman Empire in Western Political Thought, 1450–1750. New York: Oxford University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Mancini, Pasquale. Della nazionalità come fondamento del diritto delle genti. Milan: Tipografia Eredi Botta, 1854.Google Scholar
Mantena, Karuna. “Social Theory in the Age of Empire.” In Empire and Modern Political Thought, edited by Muthu, Sankar, 324–50. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Marchand, Suzanne. “Intellectual History Confronts the Longue Durée.” History and Theory 59, no. 3 (2020): 482–89.Google Scholar
Martens, Georg Friedrich von. Primae lineae iuris gentium europaearum practici in usum auditorum adumbratae. Gottingen: Dietrich, 1785.Google Scholar
Martineau, Anne-Charlotte. “Concerning Violence: A Post-Colonial Reading of the Debate on the Use of Force.” Leiden Journal of International Law 29, no. 1 (2016): 95–112.Google Scholar
Martines, Lauro. Lawyers and Statecraft in Renaissance Florence. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1968.Google Scholar
McCormick, John. “Teaching in Vain: Carl Schmitt, Thomas Hobbes, and the Theory of the Sovereign State.” In The Oxford Handbook of Carl Schmitt, edited by Meierhenrich, Jens and Simons, Oliver, 269–90. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
McLeod, Travers. Rule of Law in War: International Law and United States Counterinsurgency in Iraq and Afghanistan. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
McMahon, Darrin, and Moyn, Samuel. Rethinking Modern European Intellectual History. New York: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Mégret, Frédéric. “From ‘Savages’ to ‘Unlawful Combatants’: A Postcolonial Look at International Humanitarian Law’s ‘Other’.” In International Law and Its Others, edited by Orford, Anne, 265–317. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Menchi, Silvana Seidel. Erasmo in Italia, 1520–1580. Turin: Bollati Boringhieri, 1987.Google Scholar
Meron, Theodor. “Common Rights of Mankind in Gentili, Grotius and Suarez.” American Journal of International Law 85, no. 1 (1991): 110–16.Google Scholar
Milton, Patrick, Axworthy, Michael, and Simms, Brendan. Towards A Westphalia for the Middle East. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Minnucci, Giovanni. Alberico Gentili tra mos italicus e mos gallicus: l’inedito commentario ad legem juliam de adulteriis. Bologna: Monduzzi Editore, 2002.Google Scholar
Minnucci, Giovanni. “Per una rilettura del metodo gentiliano.” In Alberico Gentili: La tradizione giuridica perugina e la fondazione del diritto internazionale, edited by Treggiari, Ferdinando, 29–56. Perugia: Università degli Studi di Perugia, 2008.Google Scholar
Molloy, Seàn. Kant’s International Relations. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Moreman, Tim R. “‘Small Wars’ and ‘Imperial Policing’: The British Army and the Theory and Practice of Colonial Warfare in the British Empire, 1919–1939.” The Journal of Strategic Studies 19, no. 4 (1996): 105–31.Google Scholar
Moyn, Samuel, and Sartori, Andrew. Global Intellectual History. New York: Columbia University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Muldoon, James. Empire and Order: The Concept of Empire, 800–1800. Basingstoke: Macmillan Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Müller, Jan-Werner. A Dangerous Mind: Carl Schmitt in Post-War European Thought. London: Yale University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Mumford, Andrew, and Reis, Bruno C.. The Theory and Practice of Irregular Warfare: Warrior-Scholarship in Counter-Insurgency. Abingdon: Routledge, 2013.Google Scholar
Murphy, Craig. International Organization and Industrial Change: Global Governance since 1850. Europe and the International Order. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1994.Google Scholar
N. A. “Inauguration de la table commemorative d’Albéric Gentil.” Revue de droit international et de législation comparée 9 (1877): 293–94.Google Scholar
N. A. “Informational Booklet of the English Sub-Committee,” 1875. L.Ital.A55d2. Bodleian Law Library.Google Scholar
Nabulsi, Karma. Traditions of War: Occupation, Resistance, and the Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Nabulsi, Karma, and Hazareesingh, Sudhir. “Using Archival Sources to Theorize about Politics.” In Political Theory: Methods and Approaches, edited by Leopold, David and Stears, Marc, 150–70. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Neff, Stephen C. Justice among Nations: A History of International Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Neff, Stephen C. War and the Law of Nations: A General History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Neocleous, Mark. “Friend or Enemy: Reading Schmitt Politically.” Radical Philosophy 79 (1996): 13–23.Google Scholar
Newman, Edward. “The ‘New Wars’ Debate: A Historical Perspective Is Needed.” Security Dialogue 35, no. 2 (2004): 173–89.Google Scholar
Nexon, Daniel H. The Struggle for Power in Early Modern Europe: Religious Conflict, Dynastic Empires, and International Change. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Nézard, Henry. “Albericus Gentilis.” In Les fondateurs du droit international: leurs œuvres, leurs doctrines, edited by Barthélemy, Joseph, 37–92. Paris: V. Giard & E. Brière, 1904.Google Scholar
Nordin, Astrid H. M., and Öberg, Dan. “Targeting the Ontology of War: From Clausewitz to Baudrillard.” Millennium Journal of International Studies 43, no. 2 (2015): 392–410.Google Scholar
Nuzzo, Luigi. Origini di una scienza: diritto internazionale e colonialismo nel XIX secolo. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann Vittorio, 2012.Google Scholar
Nuzzo, Luigi, and Vec, Miloš, eds. Constructing International Law: The Birth of a Discipline. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 2012.Google Scholar
Nys, Ernest. “L’inauguration du monument d’Albéric Gentil à San Ginesio.” Revue de droit international et de législation comparée Series 2, Vol. 10 (1908): 645–47.Google Scholar
O’Driscoll, Cian, and Brunstetter, Daniel, eds. Just War Thinkers: From Cicero to the 21st Century. New York: Routledge, 2017.Google Scholar
Odysseos, Louiza, and Petito, Fabio. The International Political Thought of Carl Schmitt: Terror, Liberal War and the Crisis of Global Order. London: Routledge, 2007.Google Scholar
Odysseos, Louiza, and Petito, Fabio. “Vagaries of Interpretation: A Rejoinder to David Chandler’s Reductionist Reading of Carl Schmitt.” Millennium 37, no. 2 (2008): 463–75.Google Scholar
Oestreich, Gerhard. Neostoicism and the Early Modern State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Ompteda, Dietrich Heinrich Ludwig von. Litteratur des gesammten sowohl natürlichen als positiven Völkerrechts. Regensberg: Johann Leopold Montags Erben, 1785.Google Scholar
Oppenheim, Lassa Francis. International Law: A Treatise. London: Longmans, Green, and Co, 1912.Google Scholar
Orford, Anne. “On International Legal Method.” London Review of International Law 1, no. 1 (2013): 166.Google Scholar
Orford, Anne. “What Is the Place of Anachronism in International Legal Thinking.” Université Paris 1, 2013. www.sam-network.org/video/what-is-the-place-of-anachronism-in-international-legal-thinking.Google Scholar
Osiander, Andreas. Before the State: Systemic Political Change in the West from the Greeks to the French Revolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Osiander, Andreas. “Sovereignty, International Relations, and the Westphalian Myth.” International Organization 55, no. 2 (2001): 251–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osterhammel, Jürgen. The Transformation of the World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Owens, Patricia. Economy of Force: Counterinsurgency and the Historical Rise of the Social. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Pagden, Anthony. The Burdens of Empire: 1539 to the Present. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Pagden, Anthony. “Gentili, Vitoria, and the Fabrication of a ‘Natural Law of Nations’.” In The Roman Foundations of the Law of Nations, edited by Kingsbury, Benedict and Straumann, Benjamin, 340–62. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Pagden, Anthony. The Languages of Political Theory in Early-Modern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Pallant, Anne. “Scipione Gentili: A Sixteenth Century Jurist.” Kingston Law Review 14 (1984): 97.Google Scholar
Palonen, Kari. Politics and Conceptual Histories: Rhetorical and Temporal Perspectives. London: Bloomsbury, 2014.Google Scholar
Palonen, Kari. “Rhetorical and Temporal Perspectives on Conceptual Change.” Finnish Yearbook of Political Thought 3 (1999): 60–73.Google Scholar
Panizza, Diego. “Alberico Gentili’s De armis romanis: The Roman Model of the Just Empire.” In The Roman Foundations of the Law of Nations: Alberico Gentili and the Justice of Empire, edited by Kingsbury, Benedict and Straumann, Benjamin, 53–84. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Panizza, Diego. “Alberico Gentili’s De iure belli: The Humanist Foundations of a Project of International Order.” In Atti dei convegni nel quarto centenario della morte 2008, 557–86. Milan: A. Giuffrè, 2010.Google Scholar
Panizza, Diego. “Il pensiero politico di Alberico Gentili: religione, virtù e ragion di stato.” In Alberico Gentili: politica e religione nell’età delle guerre di religione: atti del convegno, seconda giornata gentiliana, San Ginesio, 17 Maggio 1987, edited by Panizza, Diego, 57–213. Milan: A. Giuffrè, 2002.Google Scholar
Panizza, Diego. “Political Theory and Jurisprudence in Gentili’s De iure belli: The Great Debate between ‘Theological’ and ‘Humanist’ Perspectives from Vitoria to Grotius.” In The Roots of International Law/Les fondements du droit international: Liber amicorum Peter Haggenmacher, edited by Dupuy, Pierre-Marie, Chetail, Vincent, and Haggenmacher, Peter, 211–47. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2013.Google Scholar
Patriarca, Silvana, and Riall, Lucy, eds. The Risorgimento Revisited: Nationalism and Culture in Nineteenth Century Italy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.Google Scholar
Pennington, Kenneth. The Prince and the Law, 1200–1600: Sovereignty and Rights in the Western Legal Tradition. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Percy, Sarah. Mercenaries: The History of a Norm in International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Petito, Fabio, and Odysseos, Louiza. “Carl Schmitt.” In Critical Theorists and International Relations, edited by Edkins, Jenny and Vaughan-Williams, Nick, 305–16. London: Routledge, 2009.Google Scholar
Phillips, Andrew, and Sharman, J. C.. International Order in Diversity: War, Trade and Rule in the Indian Ocean. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Phillipson, Coleman. “Albericus Gentilis.” Journal of the Society of Comparative Legislation 12 (1911).Google Scholar
Phillipson, Coleman. “Albericus Gentilis.” In Great Jurists of the World, edited by Macdonell, John and Manson, Edward, 109–43. Boston: Little, Brown, and Company, 1914.Google Scholar
Phillipson, Coleman. “Introduction.” In Alberico Gentili, De iure belli libri tres, edited by Scott, James Brown, translated by John Carew Rolfe, 9–51. London: Clarendon Press, 1933.Google Scholar
Phillipson, Coleman. “Letter from Coleman Phillipson to Thomas Erskine Holland,” Papers relating to Albericus Gentilis, held at the Bodleian Library, University of Oxford, October 27, 1911.Google Scholar
Pitts, Jennifer. Boundaries of the International: Law and Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Pitts, Jennifer. “International Relations and the Critical History of International Law.” International Relations 31, no. 3 (2017): 282–98.Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A. The Machiavellian Moment: Florentine Political Thought and the Atlantic Republican Tradition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A. Political Thought and History: Essays on Theory and Method. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A. Politics, Language and Time: Essays on Political Thought and History. London: Methuen, 1972.Google Scholar
Poirson, Martial. Ombres de Molière: naissance d’un mythe littéraire à travers ses avatars du XVIIe siècle à nos jours. Paris: Armand Colin, 2012.Google Scholar
Policante, Amedeo. The Pirate Myth: Genealogies of an Imperial Concept. Abingdon: Routledge, 2015.Google Scholar
Porch, Douglas. “Bugeaud, Gallieni, Lyautey: The Development of French Colonial Warfare.” In Makers of Modern Strategy from Machiavelli to the Nuclear Age, edited by Paret, Peter, Craig, Gordon A., and Gilbert, Felix, 376–407. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Porch, Douglas. Counterinsurgency: Exposing the Myths of the New Way of War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Porch, Douglas. “Introduction.” In Small Wars: Their Principles and Practice, by Callwell, Charles Edward, 1–20. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press, 1899.Google Scholar
Potts, John. Ideas in Time: The Longue Durée in Intellectual History. Aix-en-Provence: Presses universitaires de Provence, 2019.Google Scholar
Press, Steven. Rogue Empires: Contracts and Conmen in Europe’s Scramble for Africa. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Quaglioni, Diego. “The Italian ‘Readers’ of Bodin, 17th–18th Centuries: The Italian ‘Readers’ Out of Italy – Alberico Gentili (1552–1608).” In The Reception of Bodin, edited by Lloyd, Howell A., 371–86. Leiden: Brill, 2013.Google Scholar
Quaglioni, Diego. “Il “Machiavellismo” di Jean Bodin (“République,” V, 5–6).” Il pensiero politico 22, no. 2 (1989): 198–207.Google Scholar
Quaglioni, Diego. “Pour une histoire du droit de guerre au début de l’âge moderne. Bodin, Gentili, Grotius.” Translated by Jean-Louis Fournel. Laboratoire italien. Politique et société, no. 10 (2010): 9–20.Google Scholar
Rasch, William. “Introduction: Carl Schmitt and the New World Order.” South Atlantic Quarterly 104, no. 2 (2005): 177–83.Google Scholar
Rasilla del Moral, Ignacio de la. “Francisco de Vitoria’s Unexpected Transformations and Reinterpretations for International Law.” International Community Law Review 15, no. 3 (1, 2013): 287–318.Google Scholar
Rasilla del Moral, Ignacio de la. “Grotian Revivals in the Theory and History of International Law.” In The Cambridge Companion to Hugo Grotius, edited by Lesaffer, Randall and Nijman, Janne E., 578–96. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021.Google Scholar
Rasilla del Moral, Ignacio de la. “The Problem of Periodization in the History of International Law.” Law and History Review 37, no. 1 (2019): 275–308.Google Scholar
Rasilla del Moral, Ignacio de la. “The Shifting Origins of International Law.” Leiden Journal of International Law 28, no. 3 (2015): 419–40.Google Scholar
Rava, Luigi. Ministro della istruzione pubblica, Alberico Gentili: Discorso pronunciato all’inaugurazione del monumento in San Ginesio, 26 Settembre 1908. Roma, 1908.Google Scholar
Ravndal, Ellen. “Acting Like a State: Non-European Membership of International Organisations in the Nineteenth Century.” In De-Centering State Making Comparative and International Perspectives, edited by Bartelson, Jens, Hall, Martin, and Teorell, Jan, 175–96. Cheltenham and Camberley: Edward Elgar, 2018.Google Scholar
Ravndal, Ellen. “Colonies, Semi-Sovereigns, and Great Powers: IGO Membership Debates and the Transition of the International System.” Review of International Studies 46, no. 2 (2020): 278–98.Google Scholar
Ravndal, Ellen. “From an Inclusive to an Exclusive International Order: Membership of International Organisations from the 19th to the 20th Century.” STANCE Working Paper Series, Lund: Department of Political Science, Lund University 8 (2016).Google Scholar
Rech, Walter. Enemies of Mankind: Vattel’s Theory of Collective Security. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2013.Google Scholar
Rech, Walter. “Rightless Enemies: Schmitt and Lauterpacht on Political Piracy.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 32, no. 2 (2012): 235–63.Google Scholar
Reid, Julian. “Reappropriating Clausewitz: The Neglected Dimensions of Counter-Strategic Thought.” In Classical Theory in International Relations, edited by Jahn, Beate, 277–95. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Reus-Smit, Christian, and Snidal, Duncan, eds. The Oxford Handbook of International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Riall, Lucy. The Italian Risorgimento: State, Society and National Unification. London: Routledge, 1994.Google Scholar
Richter, Melvin. The History of Political and Social Concepts: A Critical Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Ricœur, Paul. “Appropriation.” In Hermeneutics and the Human Sciences: Essays on Language, Action, and Interpretation, by Ricœur, Paul, 182–93. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Ringmar, Erik. Identity, Interest and Action: A Cultural Explanation of Sweden’s Intervention in the Thirty Years War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Rivier, Alphonse. “Review: An Inaugural Lecture on Albericus Gentilis. Delivered at All Souls College, by Thomas Erskine Holland.” Revue de droit international et de législation comparée 7 (1875): 321–24.Google Scholar
Rivier, Alphonse. “Review: The Law of Nationals Considered as Independent Political Communities. On the Rights and Duties of Nations in Times of War.” Revue de droit international et de législation comparée 7 (1875): 699–702.Google Scholar
Rolin-Jaequemyns, Gustave. “Albéric Gentil. Hommages à sa mémoire.” Revue de droit international et de législation comparée 8 (1876): 141–44.Google Scholar
Rolin-Jaequemyns, Gustave. “Quelques mots sur les hommages projetés à la mémoire de Grotius et d’Albéric Gentil, et sur les dernières publications y relatives.” Revue de droit international et de législation comparée 8 (1876): 690–96.Google Scholar
Rösch, Felix. Power, Knowledge, and Dissent in Morgenthau’s Worldview. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015.Google Scholar
Rosenfeld, Sophia. Common Sense: A Political History. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Roshchin, Evgeny. “(Un)Natural and Contractual International Society: A Conceptual Inquiry.” European Journal of International Relations 19, no. 2 (2013): 257–79.Google Scholar
Rossi, Christopher R. Broken Chain of Being: James Brown Scott and the Origins of Modern International Law. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer, 1998.Google Scholar
Rothschild, Emma. “Arcs of Ideas: International History and Intellectual History.” In Transnationale Geschichte: Themen, Tendenzen und Theorien, edited by Budde, Gunilla, Conrad, Sebastian, and Janz, Oliver, 217–26. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2006.Google Scholar
Rubin, Alfred P., and Boczek, B. A.. “Private and Public History; Private and Public Law.” In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (American Society of International Law), 30–39, 1988.Google Scholar
Sarkees, Meredith Reid, Wayman, Frank Whelon, and Singer, J. David. “Inter-State, Intra-State, and Extra-State Wars: A Comprehensive Look at Their Distribution over Time, 1816–1997.” International Studies Quarterly 47, no. 1 (2003): 49–70.Google Scholar
Scarfi, Juan Pablo. The Hidden History of International Law in the Americas: Empire and Legal Networks. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Scheipers, Sibylle. “‘The Most Beautiful of Wars’: Carl von Clausewitz and Small Wars.” European Journal of International Security 2, no. 1 (2017): 47–63.Google Scholar
Scheipers, Sibylle. Unlawful Combatants: A Genealogy of the Irregular Fighter. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Schellhase, Kenneth C. Tacitus in Renaissance Political Thought. London: University of Chicago Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Scheuerman, William E. Carl Schmitt: The End of Law. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 1999.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Brian. The Political Discourse of Anarchy: A Disciplinary History of International Relations. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. “The Changing Structure of International Law.” Journal for Cultural Research 20, no. 3 (2016): 310–28.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. “The Concept of Piracy (1937).” Humanity: An International Journal of Human Rights, Humanitarianism, and Development 2, no. 1 (2011): 27–29.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. “Forms of Modern Imperialism in International Law.” In Spatiality, Sovereignty and Carl Schmitt: Geographies of the Nomos, edited by Legg, Stephen, 29–45. Abingdon: Routledge, 2011.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. “Der Führer schützt das Recht.” Deutsche Juristen-Zeitung, no. 39 (1934): 945–50.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. “The Großraum in International Law with a Ban on Intervention for Spatially Foreign Powers.” In Writings on War, edited by Nunan, Timothy, 75–124. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. “Großraum versus Universalism: The International Legal Struggle over the Monroe Doctrine,” In Spatiality, Sovereignty and Carl Schmitt: Geographies of the Nomos, edited by Legg, Stephen, 46–54. Abingdon: Routledge, 2011.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. “The International Crime of Aggression and the Principle ‘nullum crimen, nulla poena sine lege’.” In Writings on War, edited and translated by Nunan, Timothy, 125–97. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. The Nomos of the Earth in the International Law of the Jus Publicum Europaeum. New York: Telos Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. “Reich Staat Bund. Antrittsvorlesung, Gehalten an der Kölner Universität Am 20. Juni 1933.” In Positionen und Begriffe: Im Kampf mit Weimar – Genf – Versailles 1923–1939, 190–98. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1994.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. Theory of the Partisan: Intermediate Commentary on the Concept of the Political. New York: Telos Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. “The Turn to the Discriminating Concept of War.” In Writings on War, edited by and translated Nunan, Timothy, 30–74. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Schöndorf, Roy S. “Extra-State Armed Conflicts: Is There a Need for a New Legal Regime?” NYU Journal of International Law and Politics 37 (2004): 1–78.Google Scholar
Schröder, Peter. “Carl Schmitt’s Appropriation of the Early Modern European Tradition of Political Thought on the State and Interstate Relations.” History of Political Thought 33, no. 2 (2012): 348–71.Google Scholar
Schröder, Peter. Trust in Early Modern International Political Thought, 1598–1713. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Schröder, Peter. “Vitoria, Gentili, Bodin: Sovereignty and the Law of Nations.” In The Roman Foundations of the Law of Nations, edited by Kingsbury, Benedict and Straumann, Benjamin, 163–86. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Schroeder, Paul W. The Transformation of European Politics, 1763–1848. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Schulz, Carsten-Andreas. “Civilisation, Barbarism and the Making of Latin America’s Place in 19th-Century International Society.” Millennium 42, no. 3 (2014): 837–59.Google Scholar
Schwab, George. The Challenge of the Exception: An Introduction to the Political Ideas of Carl Schmitt between 1921 and 1936. New York: Greenwood Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Schwab, George. “Introduction.” In Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty. Edited and translated by Schwab, George. Foreword by Strong, Tracy B.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2006, xxxvvii–lii.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Benjamin. “Some Polarities in Confucian Thought.” In Confucianism in Action, edited by Nivison, David S. and Wright, Arthur F., 50–62. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1959.Google Scholar
Seigel, Jerrold. The Idea of the Self: Thought and Experience in Western Europe since the Seventeenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Sharman, J. C., and Phillips, Andrew. Outsourcing Empire: How Company-States Made the Modern World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2020.Google Scholar
Sharp, Andrew. “Alberico Gentili’s Obscure Resurrection as a Royalist in 1644.” In Alberico Gentili: l’ordine internazionale in un mondo a più civiltà: atti del convegno decima giornata gentiliana. Milan: A. Giuffrè, 2002, 285–313.Google Scholar
Shiller, Robert J. Narrative Economics: How Stories Go Viral and Drive Major Economic Events. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2020.Google Scholar
Simmonds, K. R. “The Gentili Manuscripts.” Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte/Romanistische Abteilung 76, no. 1 (1959): 534–52.Google Scholar
Simmonds, K. R. “Hugo Grotius and Alberico Gentili.” German Yearbook of International Law 8 (1959): 85–100.Google Scholar
Simpson, Gerry. “Enemies of Mankind.” In Ethics, Law, and Society, Vol. 2, edited by Gunning, Jennifer and Holm, Søren, 85–94. Chalgrove: Ashgate, 2006.Google Scholar
Singh, Prabhakar. “Book Review: Lauren Benton and Lisa Ford. Rage for Order: The British Empire and the Origins of International Law, 1800–1850; Andrew Fitzmaurice. Sovereignty, Property and Empire, 1500–2000.” European Journal of International Law 28, no. 3 (2017): 975–86.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. The Foundations of Modern Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. “A Genealogy of the Modern State (British Academy Lecture).” Proceedings of the British Academy 162 (2008): 325–70.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. Liberty before Liberalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. “Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas.” History and Theory 8 (1969): 3–53.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. “A Reply to My Critics.” In Meaning and Context: Quentin Skinner and His Critics, edited by Tully, James, 231–88. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. “Some Problems in the Analysis of Political Thought and Action.” In Meaning and Context: Quentin Skinner and His Critics, edited by Tully, James, 97–118. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. Visions of Politics (3 vols). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Skodo, Admir. “Post-Analytic Philosophy of History.” Journal of the Philosophy of History 3, no. 3 (2009): 308–33.Google Scholar
Slomp, Gabriella. Carl Schmitt and the Politics of Hostility, Violence and Terror. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.Google Scholar
Smeltzer, Joshua. “On the Use and Abuse of Francisco de Vitoria: James Brown Scott and Carl Schmitt.” Journal of the History of International Law 20, no. 2 (2018), 345–72.Google Scholar
Somos, Mark, and Smeltzer, Joshua. “Vitoria, Suárez, and Grotius: James Brown Scott’s Enduring Revival.” Grotiana 41, no. 1 (2020): 137–62.Google Scholar
Specter, Matthew G. “What’s ‘Left’ in Schmitt? From Aversion to Appropriation in Contemporary Political Theory.” In The Oxford Handbook of Carl Schmitt, edited by Meierhenrich, Jens and Simons, Oliver, 426–54. New York: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Spiers, Edward M. “The Use of the Dum Dum Bullet in Colonial Warfare.” The Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History 4, no. 1 (1975): 3–14.Google Scholar
Steiger, Heinhard. “Die Träger des ius belli ac pacis 1648–1806.” In Staat und Krieg: Vom Mittelalter bis zur Moderne, edited by Rösener, Werner, 595–613. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2000.Google Scholar
Stern, Philip J. The Company-State: Corporate Sovereignty and the Early Modern Foundations of the British Empire in India. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Straumann, Benjamin. “The Corpus iuris as a Source of Law Between Sovereigns in Alberico Gentili’s Thought.” In The Roman Foundations of the Law of Nations: Alberico Gentili and the Justice of Empire, edited by Kingsbury, Benedict and Straumann, Benjamin, 101–25. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Straumann, Benjamin. Crisis and Constitutionalism: Roman Political Thought from the Fall of the Republic to the Age of Revolution. New York: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Straumann, Benjamin. “The Energy of Concepts: The Role of Concepts in Long-Term Intellectual History and Social Reality.” Journal of the Philosophy of History 14, no. 2 (2019): 147–82.Google Scholar
Strong, Tracy. Foreword to Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty by Carl Schmitt. London: University of Chicago Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Suin, Davide. “Principi supremi e societas hominum: il problema del potere nella riflessione di Alberico Gentili.” Scienza & Politica. Per una storia delle dottrine 29, no. 56 (2017), 107–24.Google Scholar
Sylvest, Casper. British Liberal Internationalism, 1880–1930: Making Progress? Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Sylvest, Casper. “‘Our Passion for Legality’: International Law and Imperialism in Late Nineteenth-Century Britain.” Review of International Studies 34, no. 3 (2008): 403–23.Google Scholar
Sylvester, Christine. “War Experiences/War Practices/War Theory.” Millennium Journal of International Studies 40, no. 3 (2012): 483–503.Google Scholar
Tai, Emily Sohmer. “Marking Water: Piracy and Property in the Pre-Modern West.” In Seascapes, Littoral Cultures, and Trans-Oceanic Exchanges (Perspectives on the Global Past), edited by Bentley, Jerry H., Bridenthal, Renate, and Wigen, Karen, 205–20. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Teschke, Benno. “Carl Schmitt’s Concepts of War: A Categorical Failure.” In The Oxford Handbook of Carl Schmitt, edited by Meierhenrich, Jens and Simons, Oliver, 367–400. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Teschke, Benno. “Decisions and Indecisions: Political and Intellectual Receptions of Carl Schmitt.” New Left Review, no. 67 (2011): 61–95.Google Scholar
Teschke, Benno. “Fatal Attraction: A Critique of Carl Schmitt’s International Political and Legal Theory.” International Theory 3, no. 2 (2011): 179–227.Google Scholar
Teschke, Benno. The Myth of 1648: Class, Geopolitics, and the Making of Modern International Relations. London: Verso, 2003.Google Scholar
Thompson, Martyn. “Reception Theory and the Interpretation of Historical Meaning.” History and Theory 32, no. 3 (1993): 248–72.Google Scholar
Thomson, Janice. Mercenaries, Pirates, and Sovereigns: State-Building and Extraterritorial Violence in Early Modern Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Thorup, Mikkel. “Enemy of Humanity: The Anti-Piracy Discourse in Present-Day Anti-Terrorism.” Terrorism and Political Violence 21, no. 3 (2009): 401–11.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles. Coercion, Capital, and European States, AD 990–1992. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 1992.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles. “War Making and State Making as Organized Crime.” In Bringing the State Back In, edited by Tilly, Charles, Evans, Peter B., Rueschemeyer, Dietrich, and Skocpol, Theda, 169–91. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Tischer, Anuschka. “Princes’ Justifications of War in Early Modern Europe: The Constitution of an International Community by Communication.” In The Justification of War and International Order: From Past to Present, edited by Brock, Lothar and Simon, Hendrik, 65–80. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021.Google Scholar
Toffanin, Giuseppe. Machiavelli e il “tacitismo”: la “politica storica” al tempo della controriforma. Padova: A. Draghi, 1921.Google Scholar
Tribe, Keith. The Economy of the Word: Language, History, and Economics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Tuck, Richard. Philosophy and Government, 1572–1651. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Tuck, Richard. The Sleeping Sovereign: The Invention of Modern Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Turner, Henry S. The Corporate Commonwealth: Pluralism and Political Fictions in England, 1516–1651. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Twiss, Travers. “Albericus Gentilis on the Right of War.” The Law Magazine and Review 3, no. 5 (1878): 137–61.Google Scholar
Twiss, Travers. The Law of Nations Considered as Independent Political Communities: On the Rights and Duties of Nations in Time of Peace. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1884.Google Scholar
Twiss, Travers. “Les travaux de l’association pour la réforme et la codification du droit des gens pendant sa session du mois d’août 1879.” Revue de droit international et de législation comparée 11 (1879): 440–42.Google Scholar
Vadi, Valentina. “Alberico Gentili on Roman Imperialism: Dialectic Antinomies.” Journal of the History of International Law 16, no. 2 (2014): 157–77.Google Scholar
Vadi, Valentina. War and Peace: Alberico Gentili and the Early Modern Law of Nations. War and Peace. Leiden: Brill Nijhoff, 2020.Google Scholar
Valdarnini, Angelo. Alberico Gentili fondatore del diritto internazionale [con una lettera di E. Laboulaye]. Florence: Tipografia e Litografia di G. Carnesecchi E Figli, 1875.Google Scholar
Van Creveld, Martin. Nuclear Proliferation and the Future of Conflict. New York: Free Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Van der Molen, Gesina H. J. Alberico Gentili and the Development of International Law: His Life, Work and Times. Leiden: Albertus Willem Sijthoff, 1968.Google Scholar
Van Ittersum, Martine. “Confronting Grotius’ Legacy in an Age of Revolution: The Cornets de Groot Family in Rotterdam, 1748–98.” The English Historical Review 127, no. 529 (2012): 1367–1403.Google Scholar
Van Ittersum, Martine. “Hugo Grotius: The Making of a Founding Father of International Law.” In The Oxford Handbook of the Theory of International Law, edited by Orford, Anne, Hoffmann, Florian, and Clark, Martin, 82–100. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Vattel, Emer de. Le droit des gens, ou principes de la loi naturelle, appliqués à la conduite et aux affaires des nations et des souverains. Washington, DC: Carnegie Institution of Washington, 1916.Google Scholar
Vaughan, Geoffrey M. “The Decline of Sovereignty in the Liberal Tradition: The Case of John Rawls.” In Souveränitätskonzeptionen: Beiträge zur Analyse politischer Ordnungsvorstellungen im 17. bis zum 20. jahrhundert, edited by Schröder, Peter and Peters, Martin, 157–85. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 2000.Google Scholar
Vecchio, Giorgio del. “The Posthumous Fate of Alberico Gentili.” American Journal of International Law 50, no. 3 (1956): 664–67.Google Scholar
Veith, Jerome. Gadamer and the Transmission of History. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Vergerio, Claire. “Alberico Gentili’s De iure belli: An Absolutist’s Attempt to Reconcile the Jus Gentium and the Reason of State Tradition.” Journal of the History of International Law 19, no. 4 (2017): 1–38.Google Scholar
Vergerio, Claire. “Beyond the Nation-State.” Boston Review (blog), May 27, 2021. https://bostonreview.net/politics/claire-vergerio-beyond-nation-state.Google Scholar
Vergerio, Claire. “Context, Reception, and the Study of Great Thinkers in International Relations.” International Theory 11, no. 1 (2019): 110–37.Google Scholar
Vergerio, Claire. “International Law and the Laws of War.” In The Routledge Handbook of Historical International Relations, edited by Lopez, Julia Costa, Leira, Halvard, and de Carvalho, Benjamin, 321–29. Abingdon: Routledge, 2021.Google Scholar
Viano, Francesca Lidia. Sentinel: The Unlikely Origins of the Statue of Liberty. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Vick, Brian E. The Congress of Vienna: Power and Politics after Napoleon. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Vigneswaran, Darshan, and Quirk, Joel. “Past Masters and Modern Inventions: Intellectual History as Critical Theory.” International Relations 24, no. 2 (2010): 107–31.Google Scholar
Viroli, Maurizio. From Politics to Reason of State: The Acquisition and Transformation of the Language of Politics, 1250–1600. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Vitalis, Robert. White World Order, Black Power Politics: The Birth of American International Relations. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Vitoria, Francisco de. Political Writings. Edited by Pagden, Anthony and Lawrance, Jeremy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Vollerthun, Ursula, and Richardson, James L.. The Idea of International Society: Erasmus, Vitoria, Gentili and Grotius. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Walker, Lydia. “Decolonization in the 1960s: On Legitimate and Illegitimate Nationalist Claims-Making.” Past & Present 242, no. 1 (2019): 227–64.Google Scholar
Walker, Rob. “History and Structure in the Theory of International Relations.” Millennium 18, no. 2 (1989): 163–83.Google Scholar
Walker, Thomas Alfred. A History of the Law of Nations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1899.Google Scholar
Wallenius, Tomas. “The Case for a History of Global Legal Practices.” European Journal of International Relations 25, no. 1 (2017): 108–30.Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth Neal. Man, the State, and War: A Theoretical Analysis. New York: Columbia University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael. Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations. New York: Basic Books, 2006.Google Scholar
Ward, Robert Plumer. An Enquiry into the Foundation and History of the Law of Nations in Europe: From the Time of the Greeks and Romans, to the Age of Grotius. London: J. Butterworth Fleet-Street, 1795.Google Scholar
Warren, Christopher. “Gentili, the Poets, and the Laws of War.” In The Roman Foundations of the Law of Nations: Alberico Gentili and the Justice of Empire, edited by Kingsbury, Benedict and Straumann, Benjamin, 146–62. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Warren, Christopher. “Hobbes’s Thucydides and the Colonial Law of Nations.” The Seventeenth Century 24, no. 2 (2013): 260–86.Google Scholar
Weigley, Russell F. The Age of Battles: The Quest for Decisive Warfare from Breitenfeld to Waterloo. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Welch, David A. “Why International Relations Theorists Should Stop Reading Thucydides.” Review of International Studies 29, no. 3 (2003): 301–19.Google Scholar
Wells, Nathan. “Westlake, John (1828–1913).” In Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (online ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/ref:odnb/33944Google Scholar
Wendt, Alexander. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Weststeijn, Arthur. “The VOC as a Company-State: Debating Seventeenth-Century Dutch Colonial Expansion.” Itinerario 38, no. 1 (2014): 13–34.Google Scholar
“What Makes It a War?” The Economist, November 9, 2013. www.economist.com/news/briefing/21589432-some-say-killing-25-people-year-enough-others-suggest-1000-what-makes-it-war.Google Scholar
Wheaton, Henry. Histoire des progrès du droit des gens en Europe et en Amérique: depuis la paix de Westphalie jusqu’à nos jours. Leipzig: F.A. Brockhaus, 1853.Google Scholar
Whelan, F.G. “Vattel’s Doctrine of the State.” History of Political Thought 9, no. 1 (1988): 59.Google Scholar
White, Hayden, and Rogne, Erlend. “The Aim of Interpretation Is to Create Perplexity in the Face of the Real: Hayden White in Conversation with Erlend Rogne.” History and Theory 48, no. 1 (2009): 63–75.Google Scholar
Whitman, James Q. The Verdict of Battle: The Law of Victory and the Making of Modern War. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Whittingham, Daniel. “‘Savage Warfare’: CE Callwell, the Roots of Counter-Insurgency, and the Nineteenth Century Context.” Small Wars & Insurgencies 23, no. 4–5 (2012): 591–607.Google Scholar
Whyte, Jessica. “The ‘Dangerous Concept of the Just War’: Decolonization, Wars of National Liberation, and the Additional Protocols to the Geneva Conventions.” Humanity: An International Journal of Human Rights, Humanitarianism, and Development 9, no. 3 (2018): 313–41.Google Scholar
Wigen, Einar. “Two-Level Language Games: International Relations as Inter-Lingual Relations.” European Journal of International Relations 21, no. 2 (2015): 427–50.Google Scholar
Wight, Gabriele, and Porter, Brian, eds. International Theory: The Three Traditions: Martin Wight. Leicester: Leicester University Press for the Royal Institute of International Affairs, 1991.Google Scholar
Wight, Martin. “Why Is There No International Theory?” International Relations 2, no. 1 (April 1, 1960): 35–48.Google Scholar
Wijffels, Alain. “Alberico Gentili and the Hanse: The Early Reception of De Iure Belli (1598).” In The Roots of International Law/Les fondements du droit international: Liber amicorum Peter Haggenmacher, edited by Dupuy, Pierre-Marie, Chetail, Vincent, and Haggenmacher, Peter, 181–209. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2013.Google Scholar
Wijffels, Alain. “Antiqui et recentiores: Alberico Gentili – Beyond mos italicus and Legal Humanism.” In Reassessing Legal Humanism and Its Claims, edited by du Plessis, Paul J. and Cairns, John W., 11–40. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Wijffels, Alain. “Assolutismo politico e diritto di resistenza: la disputatio gentiliana ‘De vi civium in regem semper iniusta’.” Appendice. In Alberico Gentili, L’uso della forza nel diritto internazionale. Atti del Convegno Undicesima Giornata Gentiliana, San Ginesio, 2004. Milano: Dott. A Giuffrè Editore, 459–96.Google Scholar
Wijffels, Alain. “From Perugia to Oxford: Past and Present of Political Paradigms.” In Alberico Gentili: la traduzione giuridica perugina e la fondazione del diritto internazionale, edited by Treggiari, Ferdinando, 57–78. Perugia: Università degli Studi di Perugia, 2008.Google Scholar
Williams, Michael C. “The Hobbesian Theory of International Relations: Three Traditions.” In Classical Theory in International Relations, edited by Jahn, Beate, 253–76. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Wilson, Peter H. Heart of Europe: A History of the Holy Roman Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Wimmer, Andreas, and Min, Brian. “From Empire to Nation-State: Explaining Wars in the Modern World, 1816–2001.” American Sociological Review 71, no. 6 (2006): 867–97.Google Scholar
Withington, Phil. The Politics of Commonwealth: Citizens and Freemen in Early Modern England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Witt, John Fabian. Lincoln’s Code: The Laws of War in American History. New York: Free Press, 2012.Google Scholar