Anderson, M. J. 1997. The Fall of Troy in Early Greek Poetry and Art. Oxford: Clarendon PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, W. S. 1969. The Art of the Aeneid. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice HallGoogle Scholar

Andersson, T. M. 1976. Early Epic Scenery: Homer, Virgil, and the Medieval Legacy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University PressGoogle Scholar

Armstrong, R. 2002. ‘Crete in the Aeneid: Recurring Trauma and Alternative Fate’, Classical Quarterly 52: 321–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Armstrong, R. 2005. ‘Ascanius in the Aeneid’, Omnibus 49: 8–9Google Scholar

Austin, N. 1994. Helen of Troy and her Shameless Phantom. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University PressGoogle Scholar

Austin, R. G. 1964. P. Vergili Maronis Aeneidos Liber Secundus. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar

Austin, R. G. 1971. P. Vergili Maronis Aeneidos Liber Primus. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar

Bailey, C. 1922. Lucreti De Rerum Natura Libri Sex. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar

Baker, R. 1980. ‘Regius Puer: Ascanius in the Aeneid’, in: Marshall, B. (ed.) Vindex Humanitatis: Essays in Honour of John Huntly Bishop. Armidale: University of New England, pp. 129–45Google Scholar

Bandera, C. 1981. ‘Sacrificial Levels in Virgil’s Aeneid’, Arethusa 14: 217–39Google Scholar

Bannon, C. J. 1997. The Brothers of Romulus: Fraternal pietas in Roman Law, Literature, and Society. Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar

Barchiesi, A. 1997. The Poet and the Prince: Ovid and Augustan Discourse. Berkeley: University of California PressGoogle Scholar

Barchiesi, A. 2006. ‘Mobilità e religione nell’ Eneide: diaspora, culto, spazio, identità locali’, in: von der Osten, D. Elm, Rüpke, J. and Waldner, K. (eds) Texte als Medium und Reflexion von Religion im römischen Reich. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, pp. 13–30Google Scholar

Barchiesi, A. and Rosati, G. 2009. Ovidio: Metamorfosi, Vol. II, 2nd edn. Milan: Arnoldo MondadoriGoogle Scholar

Barker, E. 2004. ‘The Fall-out from Dissent: Hero and Audience in Sophocles’ Ajax’, Greece and Rome 51: 1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baroin, C. 2010. ‘Remembering One’s Ancestors, Following in their Footsteps, Being Like them: The Role and Forms of Family Memory in the Building of Identity’, in: Dasen and Späth (eds), pp. 19–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barr, W. 1981. Claudian’s Panegyric on the Fourth Consulate of Honorius. Liverpool: Francis CairnsGoogle Scholar

Barrett, C. 1998. ‘Pentheus and the Spectator in Euripides’ Bacchae’, American Journal of Philology 119: 337–60Google Scholar

Barrett, C. K. 1994. A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Acts of the Apostles, Vol. I. Edinburgh: T&T ClarkGoogle Scholar

Battistella, C. 2010. ‘Un modello epico per il primo amore di Apollo (Ov. Met. 1.441–567 e Verg. Aen. 9.590–663)’, Vergilius 56: 19–25Google Scholar

Battistoni, F. 2010. Parenti dei romani: mito troiano e diplomazia. Bari: EdipugliaGoogle Scholar

Becker, A. S. 1995. The Shield of Achilles and the Poetics of Ekphrasis. Lanham, MD: Rowman & LittlefieldGoogle Scholar

Belfiore, E. 1984. ‘ter frustra comprensa: Embraces in the Aeneid’, Phoenix 38: 19–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bergren, A. 1989. ‘The Homeric Hymn to Aphrodite: Tradition and Rhetoric, Praise and Blame’, Classical Antiquity 8: 1–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bernstein, N. W. 2008. In the Image of the Ancestors: Narratives of Kinship in Flavian Epic. University of Toronto PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bettini, M. 1991. Anthropology and Roman Culture: Kinship, Time, Images of the Soul. van Sickle, J. (trans.). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University PressGoogle Scholar

Bettini, M. 1997. ‘Ghosts of Exile: Doubles and Nostalgia in Vergil’s parva Troia (Aeneid 3.294ff.)’, Classical Antiquity 16: 8–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bettini, M. 2009. Affari di famiglia: la parentela nella letteratura e nella cultura antica. Bologna: Il MulinoGoogle Scholar

Bickel, E. 1957. ‘Lucius Caesar Cos. 64 in der Origo Gentis Romanae: Die traditionelle Urgeschichte der Römer als Bestandteil ihrer Pontifikal- und Augural-Literatur’, Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 100: 201–36Google Scholar

Biow, D. 1994. ‘Epic Performance on Trial: Virgil’s Aeneid and the Power of Eros in Song’, Arethusa 27: 223–46Google Scholar

Bishop, J. H. 1988. The Cost of Power: Studies in the Aeneid of Virgil. Armidale: University of New EnglandGoogle Scholar

Bleisch, P. 1996. ‘On Choosing a Spouse: Aeneid 7.378–84 and Callimachus’ Epigram 1’, American Journal of Philology 117: 453–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bleisch, P. 1999. ‘The Empty Tomb at Rhoetum: Deiphobus and the Problem of the Past in Aeneid 6.494–547’, Classical Antiquity 18: 187–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Block, E. 1980. ‘Failure to Thrive: The Theme of Parents and Children in the Aeneid, and its Iliadic Models’, Ramus 9: 128–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Block, E. 1981. The Effects of Divine Manifestation on the Reader’s Perspective in Vergil’s Aeneid. New York: Arno PressGoogle Scholar

Bloomer, W. M. 1992. Valerius Maximus and the Rhetoric of the New Nobility. London: DuckworthGoogle Scholar

Boas, H. 1938, Aeneas’ Arrival in Latium: Observations on Legends, History, Religion, Topography and related Subjects in Vergil, Aeneid VII, 1–135. Amsterdam: N. v. Noord-hollandsche uitgevers-mijGoogle Scholar

Bouché-Leclercq, A. 1879. Histoire de la divination dans l’antiquité. Paris: E. LevrouxGoogle Scholar

Bowie, A. M. 1990. ‘The Death of Priam: Allegory and History in the Aeneid’, Classical Quarterly 40: 470–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bowie, A. M. 1998. ‘exuvias effigiemque: Dido, Aeneas and the Body as Sign’, in: Montserrat, D. (ed.) Changing Bodies, Changing Meanings: Studies on the Human Body in Antiquity. London: Routledge, pp. 57–79Google Scholar

Bowra, C. M. 1933–4. ‘Aeneas and the Stoic Ideal’, Greece and Rome 3: 8–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boyd, B. W. 1992. ‘Virgil’s Camilla and the Traditions of Catalogue and Ecphrasis (Aeneid 7.803–17)’, American Journal of Philology 113: 213–34Google Scholar

Boyd, B. W. 1995. ‘Non enarrabile textum: Ecphrastic Trespass and Narrative Ambiguity in the Aeneid’, Vergilius 41: 71–90Google Scholar

Boyle, A. J. 1986. The Chaonian Dove: Studies in the ‘Eclogues’, ‘Georgics’ and ‘Aeneid’ of Virgil. Leiden: BrillCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Braund, S. M. and Gill, C. (eds) 1997. The Passions in Roman Thought and Literature. Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Briscoe, J. 1998. Valeri Maximi Facta et dicta memorabilia, Vol. I. Leipzig: TeubnerGoogle Scholar

Butler, M. S. 2010. ‘The Scent of a Woman’, Arethusa 43: 87–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cairns, F. 1979. Tibullus: A Hellenistic Poet at Rome. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Cairns, F. 1989. Virgil’s Augustan Epic. Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carcopino, J. 1968. Virgile et les origines d’Ostie, 2nd edn. Paris: E. de BoccardGoogle Scholar

Casali, S. 1999. ‘Facta impia (Virgil, Aeneid 4.596–9)’, Classical Quarterly 49: 203–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Casali, S. 2004. ‘Nisus and Euryalus: Exploiting the Contradictions in Virgil’s Doloneia’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 102: 319–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Casali, S. 2004–5. ‘Further Voices in Ovid Heroides 7’, Hermathena 177–8: 147–64Google Scholar

Casali, S. 2007. ‘Killing the Father: Ennius, Naevius and Virgil’s Julian Imperialism’, in: Fitzgerald and Gowers (eds), pp. 103–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Casali, S. 2008. ‘The King of Pain: Aeneas, Achates and ἄχος in Aeneid 1’, Classical Quarterly 58: 181–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Casali, S. 2009. ‘The Theophany of Apollo in Vergil, Aeneid 9: Augustanism and Self-Reflexivity’, in: Athanassaki, L., Martin, R. P. and Miller, J. F. (eds) Apolline Politics and Poetics. Athens: European Cultural Centre of Delphi, pp. 299–327Google Scholar

Casamento, A. 2011. Seneca: Fedra. Rome: Carocci editoreGoogle Scholar

Chaplin, J. D. 2000. Livy’s Exemplary History. Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coleman, R. 1982. ‘The Gods in the Aeneid’, Greece and Rome 29: 143–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coleman, R. E. 1942–3. ‘Puer Ascanius’, Classical Journal 38: 142–7Google Scholar

Conington, J. 1883. Virgil: The Works, with a Commentary, Vol. III. 3rd edn, rev. Nettleship, H.. London: Whittaker & Co.Google Scholar

Conington, J. 1884. Virgil: The Works, with a Commentary, Vol. II. 4th edn, rev. Nettleship, H.. London: Whittaker & Co.Google Scholar

Conington, J. 1898. Virgil: The Works, with a Commentary, Vol. I. 5th edn, rev. Nettleship, H. and Haverfield, F.. London: George Bell & SonsGoogle Scholar

Conte, G. B. 1986. The Rhetoric of Imitation: Genre and Poetic Memory in Virgil and Other Latin Poets. Segal, C. (trans.). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University PressGoogle Scholar

Conte, G. B. 2011. P. Vergilius Maro: Aeneis. Berlin: de GruyterGoogle Scholar

Corbeill, A. 1996. Controlling Laughter: Political Humor in the Late Roman Republic. Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar

Cottom, D. 1989. Text and Culture: The Politics of Interpretation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota PressGoogle Scholar

Cowan, R. 2009. ‘Scanning Iulus: Prosody, Position and Politics in the Aeneid’, Vergilius 55: 3–12Google Scholar

Cowan, R. 2011. ‘Sinon and the Case of the Hypermetric Oracle’, Phoenix 65: 361–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dalby, A. 2000. Empire of Pleasures: Luxury and Indulgence in the Roman World. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar

Dasen, V. and Späth, T. (eds) 2010. Children, Memory, and Family Identity in Roman Culture. Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davis, C. G. 1968. ‘The Motif of the Hunt in Vergil’s Aeneid’, in: Baker, D. N. and Fasel, G. W. (eds) Landmarks in Western Culture: Commentaries and Controversies. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, pp. 204–14Google Scholar

De Jong, I. 1989. ‘The Biter Bit: A Narratological Analysis of the Hymn to Aphrodite’, Wiener Studien 102: 13–26Google Scholar

De Temmerman, K. 2014. Crafting Characters: Heroes and Heroines in the Ancient Greek Novel. Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Vega, L. L. and De Arena, D. G. 1998. ‘La Figura de Ascanio en la Eneida’, Revista de Estudios Clásicos 27: 83–108Google Scholar

Delz, J. 1987. Sili Italici Punica. Leipzig: TeubnerGoogle Scholar

Dench, E. 2005. Romulus’ Asylum: Roman Identities from the Age of Alexander to the Age of Hadrian. Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dickey, E. 2002. Latin Forms of Address from Plautus to Apuleius. Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dickie, M. 1985. ‘The Speech of Numanus Remulus (Aeneid 9.598–620)’, Papers of the Liverpool Latin Seminar 5: 165–221Google Scholar

Dingel, J. 2001. ‘Ilus erat … Vergils Redaktion der Überlieferungen zu Ascanius-Iulus’, Philologus 145: 324–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dobbin, R. F. 1995. ‘Julius Caesar in Jupiter’s Prophecy, Aeneid, Book 1’, Classical Antiquity 14: 5–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Docherty, T. 1983. Reading (Absent) Character: Towards a Theory of Characterization in Fiction. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar

Dodds, E. R. 1960. Euripides: Bacchae, 2nd edn. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar

Dondin-Payre, M. and Raepsaet-Charlier, M.-T. (eds) 2001. Noms, identités culturelles et romanisation sous les Haut-Empire. Brussels: TimpermanGoogle Scholar

Dougherty, C. 1992. ‘When Rain Falls from the Clear Blue Sky: Riddles and Colonisation Oracles’, Classical Antiquity 11: 28–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Duckworth, G. E. 1967. ‘The Significance of Nisus and Euryalus for Aeneid IX–XII’, American Journal of Philology 88: 129–50Google Scholar

Duff, T. E. 2003. ‘Plutarch on the Childhood of Alkibiades (Alk. 2–3)’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 49: 89–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dumézil, G. 1968. Mythe et epopée: l’idéologie des trois functions dans les epopées des peuples indo-européens. Paris: GallimardCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dunkle, J. R. 1973. ‘The Hunter and Hunting in the Aeneid’, Ramus 2: 127–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dyson, J. T. 1995–6. ‘caesi iuvenci and pietas impia in Virgil’, Classical Journal 91: 277–86Google Scholar

Dyson, J. T. 1999. ‘Lilies and Violence: Lavinia’s Blush in the Song of Orpheus’, Classical Philology 94: 281–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dyson, J. T. 2001. King of the Wood: The Sacrificial Victor in Virgil’s Aeneid. Norman: University of Oklahoma PressGoogle Scholar

Ebbott, M. 2003. Imagining Illegitimacy in Classical Greek Literature. Lanham, MD: Lexington BooksGoogle Scholar

Eden, P. T. 1984. Seneca: Apocolocyntosis. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Edgeworth, R. J. 2001. ‘Ascanius’ Mother’, Hermes 129: 246–50Google Scholar

Egan, R. B. 1980. ‘Euryalus’ Mother and Aeneid 9–12’, in: Deroux, C. (ed.) Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History, Vol. II. Brussels: Latomus, pp. 157–75Google Scholar

Ehlers, W. 1949. ‘Die Gründungsprodigien von Lavinium und Alba Longa’, MH 6: 166–75Google Scholar

Eidinow, J. S. C. 2003. ‘Dido, Aeneas, and Iulus: Heirship and Obligation in Aeneid 4’, Classical Quarterly 53: 260–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elftmann, G. 1979. ‘Aeneas in His Prime: Distinctions in Age and the Loneliness of Adulthood in Vergil’s Aeneid’, Arethusa 12: 175–202Google Scholar

Elsner, J. 1991. ‘Visual Mimesis and the Myth of the Real: Ovid’s Pygmalion as Viewer’, Ramus 20: 154–67Google Scholar

Erskine, A. 2001. Troy between Greece and Rome: Local Tradition and Imperial Power. Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Evans, E. C. 1935. ‘Roman Descriptions of Personal Appearance in History and Biography’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 46: 43–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Evans, E. C. 1948. ‘Literary Portraiture in Ancient Epic: A Study of the Descriptions of Physical Appearance in Classical Epic’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 58: 189–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Evans, J. D. 1992. The Art of Persuasion: Political Propaganda from Aeneas to Brutus. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan PressGoogle Scholar

Eyben, E. 1991. ‘Fathers and Sons’, in: Rawson, B. (ed.) Marriage, Divorce, and Children in Ancient Rome. Canberra: Humanities Research Centre; Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 114–43Google Scholar

Fantham, E. 1998. Ovid: Fasti Book IV. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Farrell, J. 1999. ‘Aeneid 5: Poetry and Parenthood’, in: Perkell (ed.), pp. 96–110, 319–20Google Scholar

Farrell, J. and Nelis, D. P. (eds) 2013. Augustan Poetry and the Roman Republic. Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feeney, D. 1983. ‘The Taciturnity of Aeneas’, Classical Quarterly 33: 204–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feeney, D. 1986. ‘History and Revelation in Vergil’s Underworld’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 32: 1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feeney, D. 1991. The Gods in Epic: Poets and Critics of the Classical Tradition. Oxford: Clarendon PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feeney, D. 1999. ‘Epic Violence, Epic Order: Killings, Catalogues, and the Role of the Reader in Aeneid 10’, in: Perkell (ed.), pp. 178–94, 328–9Google Scholar

Feldherr, A. 1995. ‘Ships of State: Aeneid 5 and Augustan Circus Spectacle’, Classical Antiquity 14: 245–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feldherr, A. 1997. ‘Metamorphosis and Sacrifice in Ovid’s Theban Narrative’, Materiali e Discussioni 38: 25–55Google Scholar

Feldherr, A. 2002. ‘Stepping out of the Ring: Repetition and Sacrifice in the Boxing Match in “Aeneid” 5’, in: Levene and Nelis (eds), pp. 61–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feldman, L. H. 1952–3. ‘The Character of Ascanius in Virgil’s Aeneid’, Classical Journal 48: 303–13Google Scholar

Feldman, L. H. 1957–8. ‘Ascanius and Astyanax: A Comparative Study of Virgil and Homer’, Classical Journal 53: 361–6Google Scholar

Fenik, B. 1959. ‘Parallelism of Theme and Imagery in Aeneid II and IV’, American Journal of Philology 80: 1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Finglass, P. 2011. Sophocles: Ajax. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Fitzgerald, W. 1984. ‘Aeneas, Daedalus and the Labyrinth’, Arethusa 17: 51–65Google Scholar

Fitzgerald, W. and Gowers, E. (eds) 2007. Ennius Perennis: The Annals and Beyond. Cambridge Philological SocietyGoogle Scholar

Fletcher, F. 1941. Virgil: Aeneid VI. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar

Flower, H. I. 1996. Ancestor Masks and Aristocratic Power in Roman Culture. Oxford: Clarendon PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flower, H. I. 2003. ‘“Memories” of Marcellus: History and Memory in Roman Republican Culture’, in: Eigler, U., Gotter, U., Luraghi, N. and Walter, U. (eds) Formen römischer Geschichtsschreibung von den Anfängen bis Livius: Gattungen – Autoren – Kontexte. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, pp. 39–52Google Scholar

Fowler, B. H. 1989. The Hellenistic Aesthetic. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin PressGoogle Scholar

Fowler, D. P. 1987. ‘Vergil on Killing Virgins’, in: Whitby, M., Hardie, P. and Whitby, M. (eds) Homo Viator: Classical Essays for John Bramble. Bristol Classical Press, pp. 185–98Google Scholar

Fowler, D. P. 1990. ‘Deviant Focalisation in Virgil’s Aeneid’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 216: 42–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fowler, D. P. 1991. ‘Narrate and Describe: The Problem of Ekphrasis’, Journal of Roman Studies 81: 25–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fowler, D. P. 1996. ‘God the Father (Himself) in Vergil’, Proceedings of the Virgil Society 22: 35–52Google Scholar

Fowler, D. P. 1997a. ‘The Virgil Commentary of Servius’, in: Martindale (ed.), pp. 73–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fowler, D. P. 1997b. ‘Virgilian Narrative: Story-telling’, in: Martindale (ed.), pp. 259–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fowler, D. P. 1998. ‘Opening the Gates of War: Aeneid 7.601–640’, in: Stahl (ed.), pp. 155–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fowler, D. P. 2000. ‘Epic in the Middle of the Wood: Mise en Abyme in the Nisus and Euryalus Episode’, in: Sharrock, A. and Morales, H. (eds) Intratextuality: Greek and Roman Textual Relations. Oxford University Press, pp. 89–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fowler, W. W. 1919. The Death of Turnus. Oxford: BlackwellGoogle Scholar

Fox, M. 1996. Roman Historical Myths: The Regal Period in Augustan Literature. Oxford: Clarendon PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fraenkel, E. 1948. Review of E. K. Rand et al. (eds) 1946. Servianorum in Vergilii Carmina Commentariorum Editionis Harvardianae, Vol. II. Lancaster, PA: American Philological Association, in: Journal of Roman Studies 38: 131–43Google Scholar

Frangoulidis, S. A. 1992. ‘Duplicity and Gift-offerings in Vergil’s Aeneid 1 and 2’, Vergilius 38: 26–37Google Scholar

Freeland, C. 2004. ‘Explaining the Uncanny in The Double Life of Veronique’, in: S. J. Schneider (ed.) Horror Film and Psychoanalysis: Freud’s Worst Nightmare. Cambridge University Press, pp. 87–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fuller, J. 1998. W. H. Auden: A Commentary. Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar

Galinsky, G. K. 1968. ‘Aeneid V and the Aeneid’, American Journal of Philology 89: 157–85Google Scholar

Galinsky, G. K. 1988. ‘The Anger of Aeneas’, American Journal of Philology 109: 321–48Google Scholar

Galinsky, G. K. 1994. ‘How to be Philosophical about the End of the Aeneid’, Illinois Classical Studies 19: 191–201Google Scholar

Galinsky, G. K. 2003. ‘Greek and Roman Drama and the Aeneid’, in: Braund and Gill (eds), pp. 275–94Google Scholar

Garrison, D. H. 1978. Mild Frenzy: A Reading of the Hellenistic Love Epigram. Wiesbaden: SteinerGoogle Scholar

Gibson, B. 2006. Statius: Silvae 5. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Gildenhard, I. 2007. ‘Virgil vs. Ennius, or: The Undoing of the Annalist’, in: Fitzgerald and Gowers (eds), pp. 73–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gildenhard, I. and Zissos, A. 2000. ‘Ovid’s Narcissus (Met. 3.339–510): Echoes of Oedipus’, American Journal of Philology 121: 129–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Glei, R. 1997. Der Vater der Dinge: Interpretationen zur politischen, literarischen und kulturellen Dimension des Krieges bei Vergil. Wissenschaftlicher Verlag TrierGoogle Scholar

Golden, M. 1990. Children and Childhood in Classical Athens. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Golden, M. 2013. ‘Children in Latin Epic’, in: Grubbs, J. E. and Parkin, T. (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Childhood and Education in the Classical World. Oxford University Press, pp. 249–63Google Scholar

Goldhill, S. 1991. The Poet’s Voice: Essays on Greek Literature and Poetics. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Goldhill, S. 2003. ‘Order from Chaos’. Review of H. Newman and J. O. Newman, 2003. Times Literary Supplement 18 July 2003: 24Google Scholar

Goldschmidt, N. 2013. Shaggy Crowns: Ennius’ Annales and Virgil’s Aeneid. Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gow, A. S. F. 1950. Theocritus, Vol. II. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Gowers, E. 1993. The Loaded Table: Representations of Food in Roman Literature. Oxford: Clarendon PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gowers, E. 2003. ‘Fragments of Autobiography in Horace Satires 1’, Classical Antiquity 22: 55–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gowers, E. 2011. ‘Trees and Family Trees in the Aeneid’, Classical Antiquity 30: 87–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gowers, E. 2012. Horace: Satires Book I. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Gransden, K. W. 1976. Virgil: Aeneid Book VIII. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Gransden, K. W. 1985. ‘The Fall of Troy’, Greece and Rome 32: 60–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grassmann-Fischer, B. 1966. Die Prodigien in Vergils Aeneis. Munich: FinkGoogle Scholar

Graziosi, B. and Haubold, J. 2010. Homer: Iliad Book VI. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Gregory, A. 1994. ‘“Powerful Images”: Responses to Portraits and the Political Uses of Images in Rome’, Journal of Roman Archaeology 7: 80–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Griffin, J. 1985. Latin Poets and Roman Life. London: DuckworthGoogle Scholar

Griffith, M. 1985. ‘What Does Aeneas Look Like?’, Classical Philology 80: 309–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gruzelier, C. 1993. Claudian: de Raptu Proserpinae. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar

Gurval, R. A. 1997. ‘Caesar’s Comet’, Memoirs of the American Academy in Rome 42: 39–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Halliday, W. R. 1913. Greek Divination: A Study of its Methods and Principles. London: MacmillanGoogle Scholar

Halliwell, S. 1990. ‘Traditional Greek Conceptions of Character’, in: Pelling (ed.), pp. 32–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Halliwell, S. 2002. The Aesthetics of Mimesis: Ancient Texts and Modern Problems. Princeton University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hanink, J. 2007. ‘Fashioning Trojan Youth: Ascanius and the lusus Troiae’. MPhil essay, University of CambridgeGoogle Scholar

Hannah, B. 2004. ‘Manufacturing Descent: Virgil’s Genealogical Engineering’, Arethusa 37: 141–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hardie, P. R. 1984. ‘The Sacrifice of Iphigenia: An Example of “Distribution” of a Lucretian Theme in Virgil’, Classical Quarterly 34: 406–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hardie, P. R. 1986. Virgil’s Aeneid: Cosmos and Imperium. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar

Hardie, P. R. 1987. ‘Aeneas and the Omen of the Swans (Verg. Aen. 1.393–400)’, Classical Philology 82: 145–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hardie, P. R. 1990. ‘Ovid’s Theban History: The First “Anti-Aeneid”?’, Classical Quarterly 40: 224–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hardie, P. R. 1991a. ‘The Aeneid and the Oresteia’, Proceedings of the Virgil Society 20: 29–45Google Scholar

Hardie, P. R. 1991b. ‘The Masks of Dido’, Omnibus 21: 12–14Google Scholar

Hardie, P. R. 1992. ‘Augustan Poets and the Mutability of Rome’, in: Powell (ed.), pp. 59–82Google Scholar

Hardie, P. R. 1993a. ‘Tales of Unity and Division in Imperial Latin Epic’, in: Molyneux, J. H. (ed.) Literary Responses to Civil Discord. University of Nottingham, pp. 57–76Google Scholar

Hardie, P. R. 1993b. Epic Successors of Virgil: A Study in the Dynamics of a Tradition. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Hardie, P. R. 1994. Virgil, Aeneid: Book IX. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Hardie, P. R. 1997. ‘Virgil and Tragedy’, in: Martindale (ed.), pp. 312–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hardie, P. R. 2002. Ovid’s Poetics of Illusion. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Hardie, P. R. 2012. Rumour and Renown: Representations of Fama in Western Literature. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Hardie, P. R. 2013. ‘Trojan Palimpsests: The Archaeology of Roman History in Aeneid 2’, in: Farrell and Nelis (eds), pp. 107–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hardie, P. R. 2014. The Last Trojan Hero: A Cultural History of Virgil’s Aeneid. London and New York: I. B. TaurisCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hardie, P. R. 2015. Ovidio: Metamorfosi, Vol. VI. Milan: Arnoldo MondadoriGoogle Scholar

Harrison, E. L. 1972–3. ‘Why Did Venus Wear Boots? Some Reflections on Aeneid 1.314f.’, Proceedings of the Virgil Society 12: 10–25Google Scholar

Harrison, E. L. 1985. ‘Foundation Prophecies in the Aeneid’, Papers of the Liverpool Latin Seminar 5: 131–64Google Scholar

Harrison, S. J. (ed.) 1990. Oxford Readings in Vergil’s Aeneid. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar

Harrison, S. J. 1991. Vergil: Aeneid 10. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar

Harrison, S. J. 1996. ‘Vergil, Aeneid 1.286: Julius Caesar or Augustus?’, Papers of the Leeds International Latin Seminar 9: 127–33Google Scholar

Harrison, S. J. 1997. ‘The Survival and Supremacy of Rome: The Unity of the Shield of Aeneas’, Journal of Roman Studies 87: 70–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haupt, P. 1924. ‘Ascanius and Alba Longa’, American Journal of Philology 45: 255–9Google Scholar

Heil, A. 2012. ‘Ovid, Trist. 3.7: Ein Abschiedsbrief’, Hermes 140: 310–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heinze, R. 1993. Virgil’s Epic Technique. , H. and Harvey, D. and Robertson, F. (trans.). Berkeley: University of California PressGoogle Scholar

Hemelrijk, E. A. 1999. Matrona docta: Educated Women in the Roman Élite from Cornelia to Julia Domna. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar

Henderson, J. 1989. ‘Livy and the Invention of History’, in: Cameron, A. (ed.) History as Text: The Writing of Ancient History. London: Duckworth, pp. 64–85Google Scholar

Henry, J. 1873–89. Aeneidea, or Critical, Exegetical, and Aesthetical Remarks on the Aeneis, Vols I–IV. London: Williams and NorgateGoogle Scholar

Herrmann, L. 1939. ‘Remarques sur le ludus Troiae’, Revue Belge de Philologie et d’Histoire 18: 487–92Google Scholar

Hexter, R. 1990. ‘What Was the Trojan Horse Made of? Interpreting Vergil’s Aeneid’, Yale Journal of Criticism 3: 109–31Google Scholar

Hexter, R. 1999. ‘Imitating Troy: A Reading of Aeneid 3’, in: Perkell (ed.), pp. 64–79, 314–17Google Scholar

Heyworth, S. J. and Morwood, J. H. W. 2011. A Commentary on Propertius Book 3. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Higbie, C. 1995. Heroes’ Names, Homeric Identities. New York and London: Garland PublishingGoogle Scholar

Highet, G. 1972. The Speeches in Virgil’s Aeneid. Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar

Hill, D. E. 1996. P. Papini Stati Thebaidos libri XII. Leiden: BrillCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hinds, S. 1998. Allusion and Intertext: Dynamics of Appropriation in Roman Poetry. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Hinds, S. 2000. ‘Essential Epic: Genre and Gender from Macer to Statius’, in: Depew, M. and Obbink, D. (eds) Matrices of Genre: Authors, Canons, and Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 221–304Google Scholar

Hornsby, R. A. 1970. Patterns of Action in the Aeneid: An Interpretation of Vergil’s Epic Similes. Iowa City: University of Iowa PressGoogle Scholar

Horsfall, N. M. 1971. ‘Numanus Remulus: Ethnography and Propaganda in Aen., ix, 598 f.’, Latomus 30: 1108–16Google Scholar

Horsfall, N. M. 1976. ‘Virgil, History and the Roman Tradition’, Prudentia 8: 73–89Google Scholar

Horsfall, N. M. 1979. ‘Some Problems in the Aeneas Legend’, Classical Quarterly 29: 372–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Horsfall, N. M. 1981. ‘Virgil and the Conquest of Chaos’, Antichthon 15: 141–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Horsfall, N. M. 1986. ‘The Aeneas-Legend and the Aeneid’, Vergilius 32: 8–17Google Scholar

Horsfall, N. M. 1987. ‘non viribus aequis: Some Problems in Virgil’s Battle-Scenes’, Greece and Rome 34: 48–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Horsfall, N. M. 1989. ‘Aeneas the Colonist’, Vergilius 35: 8–27Google Scholar

Horsfall, N. M. 1991. ‘Virgil and the Poetry of Explanations’, Greece and Rome 38: 203–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Horsfall, N. M. 1995. A Companion to the Study of Virgil. Leiden: BrillGoogle Scholar

Horsfall, N. M. 2000. Virgil, Aeneid 7: A Commentary. Leiden: BrillCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Horsfall, N. M. 2006. Virgil, Aeneid 3: A Commentary. Leiden: BrillCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Horsfall, N. M. 2008. Virgil, Aeneid 2: A Commentary. Leiden: BrillCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Horsfall, N. M. 2013. Virgil, Aeneid 6: A Commentary. Berlin: de GruyterCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hui, A. 2011. ‘The Textual City: Epic Walks in Virgil, Lucan, and Petrarch’, Classical Receptions Journal 3: 148–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hutchinson, G. O. 1988. Hellenistic Poetry. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar

Hutchinson, G. O. 2013. Greek to Latin: Frameworks and Contexts for Intertextuality. Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jackson Knight, W. F. 1966. Roman Vergil, rev. edn. London: Peregrine BooksGoogle Scholar

Jacobson, H. 2008. ‘Dracontius and Ascanius’, in: Heilen, S. (ed.), In Pursuit of Wissenschaft: Festschrift für William M. Calder III zum 75. Geburtstag. Hildesheim: Olms, pp. 197–9Google Scholar

Jaeger, M. 1997. Livy’s Written Rome. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

James, S. L. 1995. ‘Establishing Rome with the Sword: condere in the Aeneid’, American Journal of Philology 116: 623–37Google Scholar

Jamset, C. 2004. ‘Death-loration: The Eroticisation of Death in the Thebaid’, Greece and Rome 51: 95–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jenkyns, R. 1998. Virgil’s Experience: Nature and History, Times, Names, and Places. Oxford: Clarendon PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnson, W. R. 1997. ‘Final Exit: Propertius 4.11’, in: Roberts, Dunn and Fowler (eds), pp. 163–80Google Scholar

Johnson, W. R. 1999. ‘Dis Aliter Visum: Self-Telling and Theodicy in Aeneid 2’, in: Perkell (ed.), pp. 50–63, 312–14Google Scholar

Jordan, H. 1869. ‘Über das Buch Origo Gentis Romanae’, Hermes 3: 389–428Google Scholar

Kassel, R. 1991. ‘Quomodo quibus locis apud veteres scriptores Graecos infantes atque parvuli pueri inducantur describantur commemorentur’, in: Nesselrath, H.-G. (ed.) Kleine Schriften. Berlin: de Gruyter, pp. 1–73Google Scholar

Keith, A. M. 2000. Engendering Rome: Women in Latin Epic. Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kennedy, D. F. 1992. The Arts of Love: Five Studies in the Discourse of Roman Love Elegy. Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kennedy, D. F. 1997. ‘Virgilian Epic’, in: Martindale (ed.), pp. 145–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kenney, E. J. 1996. Ovid: Heroides XVI–XXI. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Kenney, E. J. 2011. Ovidio: Metamorfosi, Vol. IV. Milan: Arnoldo MondadoriGoogle Scholar

Khan, H. A. 2002. ‘The Boy and the Banquet: Dido and Amor in Vergil Aen. 1’, Athenaeum 90: 187–205Google Scholar

Khariouzov, A. 2013. Prodigien in der römischen Königszeit: Eine motivgeschichtliche und narratologische Analyse im 1. Buch des Livius. Berlin: Frank & TimmeGoogle Scholar

Kinsey, T. E. 1987. ‘Virgil, Aeneid VII. 109–134’, La Parola del Passato 42: 296–7Google Scholar

Kleinknecht, H. 1944. ‘Laokoon’, Hermes 79: 66–111Google Scholar

Klotz, A. 1966. C. Iuli Caesaris Commentarii, Vol. III. Leipzig: TeubnerGoogle Scholar

Knauer, G. N. 1964. Die Aeneis und Homer: Studien zur poetischen Technik Virgils mit Listen der Homerzitate in der Aeneis. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & RuprechtGoogle Scholar

Knox, B. M. W. 1950. ‘The Serpent and the Flame: The Imagery of the Second Book of the Aeneid’, American Journal of Philology 71: 379–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koortbojian, M. 2013. The Divinization of Caesar and Augustus: Precedents, Consequences, Implications. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Köves-Zulauf, T. 1997. ‘Apollo in der Aeneis’, in: Tar, I. (ed.) Epik durch die Jahrhunderte: Internationale Konferenz Szeged 2.–4. Oktober 1997. Szeged: József Attila Tudományegyetem, pp. 108–16Google Scholar

Kragerrud, E. 1992. ‘Which Julius Caesar? On Aen. 1.286–96’, Symbolae Osloenses 67: 103–12Google Scholar

Kraus, C. S. 1994. ‘“No Second Troy”: Topoi and Refoundation in Livy, Book V’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 124: 267–89Google Scholar

Kyriakidis, S. 2002. ‘The Alban Kings in the Metamorphoses: An Ovidian Catalogue and its Historiographical Models’, in: Levene and Nelis (eds), pp. 211–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laes, C. 2011. Children in the Roman Empire: Outsiders Within. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Laird, A. 1997. ‘Approaching Characterisation in Virgil’, in: Martindale (ed.), pp. 282–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laird, A. 1999. Powers of Expression, Expressions of Power: Speech Presentation in Latin Literature. Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laird, A. 2003. ‘Roman Epic Theatre? Reception, Performance and the Poet in Virgil’s Aeneid’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 49: 19–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leach, E. W. 1999. ‘Viewing the Spectacula of Aeneid 6’, in: Perkell (ed.), pp. 111–27, 320–3Google Scholar

Lee, M. O. 1979. Fathers and Sons in Virgil’s Aeneid: Tum Genitor Natum. Albany: State University of New York PressGoogle Scholar

Lehner, J. 1984. Poesie und Politik in Claudians Panegyrikus auf das vierte Konsulat des Kaisers Honorius. Königstein: Verlag Anton HainGoogle Scholar

Levene, D. S. and Nelis, D. P. (eds) 2002. Clio and the Poets: Augustan Poetry and the Traditions of Ancient Historiography. Leiden: BrillCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Liebeschuetz, J. H. W. G. 1979. Continuity and Change in Roman Religion. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar

Lindsay, J. 1967. Picnic at Hanging Rock. Melbourne: Cheshire PublishingGoogle Scholar

Lonsdale, S. H. 1990. ‘Simile and Ecphrasis in Homer and Virgil: The Poet as Craftsman and Choreographer’, Vergilius 36: 7–30Google Scholar

Lovatt, H. V. 2005. Statius and Epic Games: Sport, Politics and Poetics in the Thebaid. Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lovatt, H. V. 2013. The Epic Gaze: Vision, Gender and Narrative in Ancient Epic. Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Luce, J. V. 1963. ‘Cleopatra as fatale monstrum (Horace, Carm. 1.37.21)’, Classical Quarterly 13: 251–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lynch, J. P. 1980. ‘Laocoön and Sinon: Virgil, Aeneid 2.40–198’, Greece and Rome 27: 170–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lyne, R. O. A. M. 1983. ‘Lavinia’s Blush: Vergil, Aeneid 12.64–70’, Greece and Rome 30: 55–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lyne, R. O. A. M. 1987. Further Voices in Vergil’s Aeneid. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar

Lyne, R. O. A. M. 1989. Words and the Poet: Characteristic Techniques of Style in Vergil’s Aeneid. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar

MacBain, B. 1982. Prodigy and Expiation: A Study in Religion and Politics in Republican Rome. Brussels: LatomusGoogle Scholar

Mac Góráin, F. 2013. ‘Virgil’s Bacchus and the Roman Republic’, in: Farrell and Nelis (eds), pp. 124–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mack, S. 1999. ‘The Birth of War: A Reading of Aeneid 7’, in: Perkell (ed.), pp. 128–47, 324–5Google Scholar

Mackail, J. W. 1914. ‘On the mensae of Aeneid, III.257, and VII.116’, Classical Review 28: 89–90Google Scholar

Mackay, L. A. 1957. ‘Achilles as Model for Aeneas’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 88: 11–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mackie, C. J. 1988. The Characterisation of Aeneas. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic PressGoogle Scholar

Maltby, R. 1991. A Lexicon of Ancient Latin Etymologies. Leeds: Francis CairnsGoogle Scholar

Mander, J. 2013. Portraits of Children on Roman Funerary Monuments. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Manson, M. M. 1981. ‘Un personage d’enfant dans l’epopée antique: Ascagne’, in: Chevallier, R. (ed.) L’épopée gréco-latine et ses prolongements européens, Paris: Les Belles Lettres, pp. 53–70Google Scholar

Mantle, I. C. 2002. ‘The Roles of Children in Roman Religion’, Greece and Rome 49: 85–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marshall, P. K. 1993. Hygini Fabulae. Leipzig: TeubnerGoogle Scholar

Marshall, P. K. 1997. Servius and Commentary on Virgil. Asheville, NC: Pegasus PressGoogle Scholar

Martindale, C. 1993. ‘Descent into Hell: Reading Ambiguity, or Virgil and the Critics’, Proceedings of the Virgil Society 21: 111–50Google Scholar

Martindale, C. (ed.) 1997. The Cambridge Companion to Virgil. Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maurach, G. 1968. ‘Der Pfeilschuß des Ascanius. Zum 9. Buch der Aeneis’, Gymnasium 75: 355–70Google Scholar

McCarthy, J. H. 1931. ‘Octavianus puer’, Classical Philology 26: 362–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mensching, E. 1970. ‘Die Interjektion heus in der Aeneis’, Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 113: 265–71Google Scholar

Merriam, C. U. 2002. ‘Storm Warning: Ascanius’ Appearances in the Aeneid’, Latomus 61: 852–60Google Scholar

Michels, A. 1997. ‘The Many Faces of Aeneas’, Classical Journal 92: 399–416Google Scholar

Miles, G. B. 1995. Livy: Reconstructing Early Rome. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University PressGoogle Scholar

Miles, G. B. 1999. ‘The Aeneid as Foundation Story’, in: Perkell (ed.), pp. 231–50, 331–3Google Scholar

Miller, D. L. 2003. Dreams of the Burning Child: Sacrificial Sons and the Father’s Witness. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University PressGoogle Scholar

Miller, J. F. 1994. ‘Arruns, Ascanius, and the Virgilian Apollo’, Colby Quarterly 30: 171–8Google Scholar

Miller, P. A. 1995. ‘The Minotaur Within: Fire, the Labyrinth, and Strategies of Containment in Aeneid 5 and 6’, Classical Philology 90: 225–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mills, S. P. 1980–1. ‘The Death of Ajax’, Classical Journal 76: 129–35Google Scholar

Mitchell-Boyask, R. N. 1996. ‘sine fine: Vergil’s Masterplot’, American Journal of Philology 117: 289–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moles, J. 1993. ‘Livy’s Preface’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 39: 141–68Google Scholar

Molyneux, J. H. 1986. ‘Sinon’s Narrative in Aeneid II’, Latomus 45: 873–7Google Scholar

Monsacré, H. 1984. Les larmes d’Achille: le héros, la femme et la souffrance dans la poésie d’Homère. Paris: Albin MichelGoogle Scholar

Montiglio, S. 2000. Silence in the Land of Logos. Princeton University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moorton, R. F. 1989. ‘The Innocence of Italy in Virgil’s Aeneid’, American Journal of Philology 110: 105–30Google Scholar

Morgan, L. 2003. ‘Child’s Play: Ovid and his Critics’, Journal of Roman Studies 93: 66–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morris, S. P. 1995. ‘The Sacrifice of Astyanax: Near Eastern Contributions to the Siege of Troy’, in: Carter, J. B. and Morris, S. P. (eds) The Ages of Homer: A Tribute to Emily Townsend Vermeule. Austin: University of Texas Press, pp. 221–45Google Scholar

Moseley, N. 1926. Characters and Epithets: A Study in Vergil’s Aeneid. New Haven: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar

Moskalew, W. 1982. Formular Language and Poetic Design in the Aeneid. Leiden: BrillCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moulton, C. 1977. Similes in the Homeric Poems. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & RuprechtGoogle Scholar

Muecke, F. 1983. ‘Foreshadowing and Dramatic Irony in the Story of Dido’, American Journal of Philology 104: 134–55Google Scholar

Myers, K. S. 2009. Ovid: Metamorphoses Book XIV. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Mynors, R. A. B. 1969. P. Vergili Maronis Opera. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Nappa, C. 1997. Review of Petrini (1997), Bryn Mawr Classical Review 2 November 1997. Online: http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/bmcr/1997/97.11.02.htmlGoogle Scholar

Nelis, D. 2001. Vergil’s Aeneid and the Argonautica of Apollonius Rhodius. Leeds: Francis CairnsGoogle Scholar

Nelis, D. 2005. ‘Patterns of Time in Vergil: The Aeneid and the Aetia of Callimachus’, in: Schwindt (ed.), pp. 71–83Google Scholar

Néraudau, J.-P. 1984. Etre enfant à Rome. Paris: Les Belles LettresGoogle Scholar

Newman, H. and Newman, J. O. 2003. A Genealogical Chart of Greek Mythology. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina PressGoogle Scholar

Newman, J. K. and Newman, F. S. 2005. Troy’s Children: Lost Generations in Virgil’s Aeneid. Hildesheim: OlmsGoogle Scholar

Nicoll, W. S. M. 1988. ‘The Sacrifice of Palinurus’, Classical Quarterly 38: 459–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nimis, S. A. 1987. Narrative Semiotics in the Epic Tradition: The Simile. Bloomington: Indiana University PressGoogle Scholar

Nisbet, R. G. M. 1978. ‘Aeneas Imperator: Roman Generalship in an Epic Context’, Proceedings of the Virgil Society 17: 50–61Google Scholar

Nisbet, R. G. M. and Hubbard, M. 1970. A Commentary on Horace: Odes Book I. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar

Nisbet, R. G. M. and Hubbard, M. 1978. A Commentary on Horace: Odes Book II. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar

Nisbet, R. G. M. and Rudd, N. 2004. A Commentary on Horace, Odes, Book III. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar

Nugent, S. G. 1992. ‘Vergil’s “Voice of the Women” in Aeneid V’, Arethusa 25: 255–92Google Scholar

Nugent, S. G. 1999. ‘The Women of the Aeneid: Vanishing Bodies, Lingering Voices’, in: Perkell (ed.), pp. 251–70, 333–5Google Scholar

Ogilvie, R. M. 1965. A Commentary on Livy, Books 1–5. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar

Ogilvie, R. M. 1974. Titi Livi Ab Urbe Condita, Vol. I. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar

O’Hara, J. J. 1990. Death and the Optimistic Prophecy in Vergil’s Aeneid. Princeton University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

O’Hara, J. J. 1994. ‘Temporal Distortions, “Fatal” Ambiguity, and Julius Caesar at Aeneid 1.286–96’, Symbolae Osloenses 69: 72–82Google Scholar

O’Hara, J. J. 1996. True Names: Vergil and the Alexandrian Tradition of Etymological Wordplay. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan PressGoogle Scholar

O’Hara, J. J. 2005. ‘Trying not to Cheat: Responses to Inconsistencies in Roman Epic’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 135: 15–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar

O’Hara, J. J. 2007. Inconsistency in Roman Epic: Studies in Catullus, Lucretius, Vergil, Ovid and Lucan. Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oliensis, E. 1996. Vergil and the Alexandrian Tradition of Etymological Wordplay, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan PressGoogle Scholar

Oliensis, E. 1997. ‘Sons and Lovers: Sexuality and Gender in Virgil’s Poetry’, in: Martindale (ed.), pp. 294–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oliensis, E. 2009. Freud’s Rome: Psychoanalysis and Latin Poetry. Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

O’Sullivan, T. M. 2009. ‘Death ante ora parentum in Virgil’s Aeneid’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 139: 447–86Google Scholar

Otis, B. 1964. Virgil: A Study in Civilised Poetry. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar

Pandey, N. B. 2013. ‘Caesar’s Comet, the Julian Star, and the Invention of Augustus’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 143: 405–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Panoussi, V. 1997. ‘Sophoclean Vergil: The Figure of Ajax in the Aeneid’, in: Papadēmētriou, I.-Th. A. (ed.) Acta: First Panhellenic and International Conference on Ancient Greek Literature, 23–26 May 1994. Athens: Hellenic Society for Humanistic Studies, pp. 691–711Google Scholar

Panoussi, V. 2002. ‘Vergil’s Ajax: Allusion, Tragedy, and Heroic Identity in the Aeneid’, Classical Antiquity 21: 95–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Parke, H. W. and Wormell, D. E. W. 1956. The Delphic Oracle. Oxford: BlackwellGoogle Scholar

Parry, A. 1963. ‘The Two Voices of Virgil’s Aeneid’, Arion 2: 66–80Google Scholar

Pascal, B. 1990. ‘The Dubious Devotion of Turnus’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 120: 251–68Google Scholar

Paschalis, M. 1997. Virgil’s Aeneid: Semantic Relations and Proper Names. Oxford: Clarendon PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pavlock, B. 1992. ‘The Hero and the Erotic in Aeneid 7–12’, Vergilius 38: 72–87Google Scholar

Pease, A. S. 1917. ‘Notes on the Delphic Oracle and Greek Colonization’, Classical Philology 12: 1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pease, A. S. 1963. M. Tulli Ciceronis de Divinatione Libri Duo. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche BuchgesellschaftGoogle Scholar

Pelling, C. (ed.) 1990. Characterisation and Individuality in Greek Literature. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Peradotto, J. J. 1969. ‘Cledonomancy in the Oresteia’, American Journal of Philology 90: 1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peradotto, J. J. 1990. Man in the Middle Voice: Name and Narration in the Odyssey. Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar

Perkell, C. (ed.) 1999. Reading Vergil’s Aeneid: An Interpretive Guide. Norman: University of Oklahoma PressGoogle Scholar

Petrini, M. 1997. The Child and the Hero: Coming of Age in Catullus and Vergil. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Phillips, D. A. 1997. ‘Seeking New Auspices: Interpreting Warfare and Religion in Virgil’s Aeneid’, Vergilius 43: 45–55Google Scholar

Polleichtner, W. 2013. ‘scaenis decora apta futuris: Das Theater und die Aeneis’, in: Baumbach, M. and Polleichtner, W. (eds) Innovation aus Tradition: Literaturwissenschaftliche Perspektiven der Vergilforschung. Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier, pp. 139–65Google Scholar

Powell, A. (ed.) 1992. Roman Poetry and Propaganda in the Age of Augustus. London: Bristol Classical PressGoogle Scholar

Powell, A. 2008. Virgil the Partisan: A Study in the Re-integration of Classics. Swansea: Classical Press of WalesGoogle Scholar

Pratt, L. 2007. ‘The Parental Ethos of the Iliad’, in: Cohen, A. and Rutter, J. B. (eds) Constructions of Childhood in Ancient Greece and Italy. Princeton: ASCSA Publications, pp. 25–40Google Scholar

Prescendi, F. 2010. ‘Children and the Transmission of Religious Knowledge’, in: Dasen and Späth (eds), pp. 73–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Primmer, A. 1994–5. ‘Das Tischprodigium im Rahmen der Aeneis’, WS 107–8: 397–416Google Scholar

Pucci, J. 1998. The Full-Knowing Reader: Allusion and the Power of the Reader in the Western Literary Tradition. New Haven: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar

Putnam, M. C. J. 1965. The Poetry of the Aeneid: Four Studies in Imaginative Unity and Design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar

Putnam, M. C. J. 1970. ‘Aeneid VII and the Aeneid’, American Journal of Philology 91: 408–30Google Scholar

Putnam, M. C. J. 1981. ‘pius Aeneas and the Metamorphosis of Lausus’, Arethusa 14: 139–56Google Scholar

Putnam, M. C. J. 1984. ‘The Hesitation of Aeneas’, Atti del Convegno Mondiale Scientifico di Studi su Virgilio, Vol. II. Milan: Mondadori, pp. 233–52Google Scholar

Putnam, M. C. J. 1985. ‘Possessiveness, Sexuality, and Heroism in the Aeneid’, Vergilius 31: 1–21Google Scholar

Putnam, M. C. J. 1986. Artifices of Eternity: Horace’s Fourth Book of Odes. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University PressGoogle Scholar

Putnam, M. C. J. 1995. Virgil’s Aeneid: Interpretation and Influence. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina PressGoogle Scholar

Putnam, M. C. J. 1998. Virgil’s Epic Designs: Ekphrasis in the Aeneid. New Haven: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar

Putnam, M. C. J. 2001. ‘The Ambiguity of Art in Virgil’s Aeneid’, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 145: 162–83Google Scholar

Quint, D. 1982–3. ‘Painful Memories: Aeneid 3 and the Problem of the Past’, Classical Journal 78: 30–8Google Scholar

Quint, D. 1989a. ‘Epic and Empire’, Comparative Literature 41: 1–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Quint, D. 1989b. ‘Repetition and Ideology in the Aeneid’, Materiali e Discussioni 23: 9–54Google Scholar

Quint, D. 1993. Epic and Empire: Politics and Generic Form from Virgil to Milton. Princeton University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ragussis, M. 1986. Acts of Naming: The Family Plot in Fiction. New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Ramsey, J. T. and Licht, A. 1997. The Comet of 44 B.C. and Caesar’s Funeral Games. Atlanta: Scholars PressGoogle Scholar

Rawson, B. 2003. Children and Childhood in Roman Italy. Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reckford, K. J. 1961. ‘Latent Tragedy in Aeneid VII, 1–285’, American Journal of Philology 82: 252–69Google Scholar

Reckford, K. J. 1995–6. ‘Recognising Venus (I): Aeneas Meets his Mother’, Arion 3: 1–42Google Scholar

Reed, J. D. 2007. Virgil’s Gaze: Nation and Poetry in the Aeneid. Princeton University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ribezzo, F. 1930. ‘L’etimologia di Iulus da Iupiter in Cesare e Vergilio’, Rivista Indo-Greco-Italica di Filologia, Lingua, Antichità 3–4: 74Google Scholar

Richard, J.-C. 1986. ‘Sur une triple étiologie du nom Iulus: Serv. Aen. 1,267 et Ps. Aur. Vict. Orig. 15,5’, in: Artheim-Stiehl, R. and Rosenbach, H. (eds) Beiträge zur altitalischen Geistesgeschichte: Festschrift Gerhard Radke zum 18. Februar 1984. Munich: Aschendorff, pp. 232–44Google Scholar

Richardson, N. 2010. Three Homeric Hymns: to Apollo, Hermes and Aphrodite. Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ridley, R. T. 1975. ‘The Enigma of Servius Tullius’, Klio 57: 147–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rimell, V. 2013. ‘(En)closure and Rupture: Roman Poetry in the Arena’, in: Grewing, F. F., Acosta-Hughes, B. and Kirichenko, A. (eds) The Door Ajar: False Closure in Greek and Roman Literature and Art. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter, pp. 103–27Google Scholar

Roberts, D. H., Dunn, F. M. and Fowler, D. (eds) 1997. Classical Closure: Reading the End in Greek and Latin Literature. Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar

Robertson, F. 1969. ‘Lament for Paetus – Propertius 3.7’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 100: 377–86Google Scholar

Rogerson, A. 2002. ‘Dazzling Likeness: Seeing Ekphrasis in Aeneid 10’, Ramus 31: 51–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rogerson, A. 2005. ‘Ascanius in Tartan’, Omnibus 49: 18–19Google Scholar

Rogerson, A. 2013. ‘Vegio’s Ascanius: Problems in the Continuation of the Aeneid’, Classical Receptions Journal 5: 106–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rosati, G. 1992. ‘L’Achilleide di Stazio, un’epica dell’ambiguità’, Maia 44: 233–66Google Scholar

Rose, H. J. 1924. ‘Anchises and Aphrodite’, Classical Quarterly 18: 11–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ross, M. M. W. 1977. The Role of Ascanius in the Aeneid. Ph.D. diss., Vanderbilt UniversityGoogle Scholar

Rubin, N. F. and Sale, W. M. 1983. ‘Meleager and Odysseus: A Structural and Cultural Study of the Greek Hunting-Maturation Myth’, Arethusa 16: 137–71Google Scholar

Ryder, H. O. 1917. ‘The Boy Ascanius’, CW 10: 210–14Google Scholar

Schiesaro, A. 1993. Review of O’Hara 1990. Classical Philology 88: 258–65Google Scholar

Schiesaro, A. 2005. ‘Under the Sign of Saturn: Dido’s Kulturkampf’, in: Schwindt (ed.), pp. 85–110Google Scholar

Schiesaro, A. 2008a. ‘Furthest Voices in Virgil’s Dido I’, Studi Italiani di Filologia Classica 4: 60–109Google Scholar

Schiesaro, A. 2008b. ‘Furthest Voices in Virgil’s Dido II’, Studi Italiani di Filologia Classica 4: 194–245Google Scholar

Schlunk, R. R. 1984. ‘The Wrath of Aeneas: Two Myths in Aeneid X’, in: Bright, D. F. and Ramage, E. S. (eds) Classical Texts and their Traditions: Studies in Honor of C. R. Trahman. Chico, CA: Scholars Press, pp. 223–9Google Scholar

Schwindt, J. P. (ed.) 2005. La représentation du temps dans la poésie augustéene. Heidelberg: WinterGoogle Scholar

Scully, S. 2000. ‘Refining Fire in Aeneid 8’, Vergilius 46: 93–113Google Scholar

Sedley, D. 2003. Plato’s Cratylus. Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Segal, C. 1987. ‘Art and the Hero: Participation, Detachment, and Narrative Point of View in Aeneid 1’, Arethusa 14: 67–83Google Scholar

Segal, C. 1997. Dionysiac Poetics and Euripides’ Bacchae. Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar

Sehlmeyer, M. 2004. Origo Gentis Romanae: Die Ursprünge des Römischen Volkes. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche BuchgesellschaftGoogle Scholar

Seider, A. M. 2013. Memory in Virgil’s Aeneid: Creating the Past. Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sens, A. 2011. Asclepiades of Samos: Epigrams and Fragments. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Seo, J. M. 2013. Exemplary Traits: Reading Characterization in Roman Poetry. Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Severy, B. 2003. Augustus and the Family at the Birth of the Roman Empire. New York: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar

Shackleton-Bailey, D. R. 1987. M. Tullius Cicero, Epistulae ad Atticum, Vol. I. Leipzig: TeubnerGoogle Scholar

Silk, M. 1995. ‘Language, Poetry and Enactment’, Dialogos 2: 109–32Google Scholar

Sinn, U. 2006. ‘Der Troia-Mythos in der römischen Kunst’, in: Zimmermann, M. (ed.) Der Traum von Troia: Geschichte und Mythos einer ewigen Stadt. Munich: C. H. Beck, pp. 104–19Google Scholar

Skinner, M. B. 2013. ‘Troy and Trauma in the Aeneid’, in: Lateiner, D., Gold, B. K. and Perkins, J. (eds) Roman Literature, Gender and Reception: domina illustris. New York: Routledge, pp. 40–52Google Scholar

Skulsky, S. 1985. ‘“invitus, regina …”: Aeneas and the Love of Rome’, American Journal of Philology 106: 447–55Google Scholar

Skutsch, O. 1985. The Annals of Q. Ennius. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar

Slater, W. J. 1974. ‘Pueri, turba minuta’, Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 21: 133–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, P. M. 1981. ‘Aineiadai as Patrons of Iliad XX and the Homeric Hymn to Aphrodite’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 85: 17–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, R. A. 2005. The Primacy of Vision in Vergil’s Aeneid. Austin: University of Texas PressGoogle Scholar

Smith, R. M. 1999. ‘Deception and Sacrifice in Aeneid 2.1–249’, American Journal of Philology 120: 503–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, S. C. 1999. ‘Remembering the Enemy: Narrative, Focalization, and Vergil’s Portrait of Achilles’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 129: 225–62Google Scholar

Spannagel, M. 1999. Exemplaria Principis: Untersuchungen zu Entstehung und Ausstattung des Augustusforums. Heidelberg: Verlag Archäologie und GeschichteGoogle Scholar

Spence, S. 1999. ‘varium et mutabile: Voices of Authority in Aeneid 4’, in: Perkell (ed.), pp. 80–95, 317–19Google Scholar

Spinazzola, V. 1953. Pompei alla luce degli scavi nuovi di Via dell’Abbondanza (anni 1910–1923), Vol. I. Rome: Libreria della StatoGoogle Scholar

Stahl, H.-P. 1981. ‘Aeneas – an “Unheroic” Hero?’, Arethusa 14: 157–75Google Scholar

Stahl, H.-P. 1990. ‘The Death of Turnus: Augustan Vergil and the Political Revival’, in: Raaflaub, K. A. and Toher, M. (eds) Between Republic and Empire: Interpretations of Augustus and his Principate. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 174–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stahl, H.-P. (ed.) 1998. Vergil’s Aeneid: Augustan Epic and Political Context. London: Duckworth, in association with the Classical Press of WalesGoogle Scholar

Starr, R. J. 1992. ‘Silvia’s Deer (Vergil, Aeneid 7.479–502): Game Parks and Roman Law’, American Journal of Philology 113: 435–9Google Scholar

Starr, R. J. 1997. ‘Aeneas as the flamen dialis? Vergil’s Aeneid and the Servian Exegetical Tradition’, Vergilius 43: 63–70Google Scholar

Steiner, D. 2001. Images in Mind: Statues in Archaic and Classical Greek Literature and Thought. Princeton University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stewart, P. 2003. Statues in Roman Society: Representation and Response. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Stout, A. M. 1994. ‘Jewelry as a Symbol of Status in the Roman Empire’, in: Sebesta, J. L. and Bonfante, L. (eds), The World of Roman Costume. University of Wisconsin Press, pp. 77–100Google Scholar

Suter, A. C. 1984. Paris/Alexandros: A Study in Homeric Techniques of Characterization. Ph.D. diss., Princeton UniversityGoogle Scholar

Suter, A. C. 1993. ‘Paris and Dionysos: Iambos in the Iliad’, Arethusa 26: 1–18Google Scholar

Tarrant, R. 2012. Virgil: Aeneid Book XII. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Taylor, L. R. 1949. Party Politics in the Age of Caesar. Berkeley: University of California PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Theodorakopoulos, E. 1997. ‘Closure: The Book of Virgil’, in: Martindale (ed.), pp. 155–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thilo, G. and Hagen, H. 1881. Servii Grammatici qui feruntur in Vergilii Carmina Commentarii, Vol. I. Leipzig: TeubnerGoogle Scholar

Thilo, G. and Hagen, H. 1883. Servii Grammatici qui feruntur in Vergilii Carmina Commentarii, Vol. II. Leipzig: TeubnerGoogle Scholar

Thomas, R. F. 1982. Lands and Peoples in Roman Poetry: The Ethnographical Tradition. Cambridge Philological Society Supplement, Vol. VIIGoogle Scholar

Thomas, R. F. 2001. Virgil and the Augustan Reception. Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Todd, R. W. 1980. ‘Lavinia Blushed’, Vergilius 26: 27–33Google Scholar

Toll, K. 1997. ‘Making Roman-ness and the Aeneid’, Classical Antiquity 16: 34–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Toohey, P. 1984. ‘Politics, Prejudice, and Trojan Genealogies: Varro, Hyginus, and Horace’, Arethusa 17: 5–28Google Scholar

Vance, E. 1981. ‘Sylvia’s Pet Stag: Wildness and Domesticity in Virgil’s Aeneid’, Arethusa 14: 127–38Google Scholar

Vanggaard, J. H. 1988. The flamen: A Study in the History and Sociology of Roman Religion. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum PressGoogle Scholar

Vasaly, A. 1993. Representations: Images of the World in Ciceronian Oratory. Berkeley: University of California PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vernant, J.-P. 1983. Myth and Thought among the Greeks. London: Routledge & Kegan PaulGoogle Scholar

Vidal-Naquet, P. 1986a. The Black Hunter: Forms of Thought and Forms of Society in the Greek World. Szegedy-Maszak, A. (trans.). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vidal-Naquet, P. 1986b. ‘The Black Hunter Revisited’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 212: 126–44Google Scholar

Wagner, J. S. 1995. Rites of Passage and the Initiation Theme in Virgil’s Aeneid. Ph.D. diss., Florida State UniversityGoogle Scholar

Walcot, P. 1991. ‘The Homeric Hymn to Aphrodite: A Literary Appraisal’, Greece and Rome 38: 137–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Watson, L. C. 2003. A Commentary on Horace’s Epodes. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Weinstock, S. 1971. Divus Julius. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar

West, D. 1969. ‘Multiple Correspondence Similes in the Aeneid’, Journal of Roman Studies 59: 40–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar

West, D. 1974. ‘The Deaths of Hector and Turnus’, Greece and Rome 21: 21–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar

West, D. 1993. ‘On Serial Narration and the Julian Star’, Proceedings of the Virgil Society 21: 1–16Google Scholar

West, D. 1998. ‘The End and the Meaning: “Aeneid” 12. 791–842’, in: Stahl (ed.), pp. 303–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar

West, G. S. 1983. ‘Andromache and Dido’, American Journal of Philology 104: 257–67Google Scholar

West, S. 1981. Omero, Odissea, Vol. I. Milan: Arnoldo MondadoriGoogle Scholar

White, R. J. 1975. The Interpretation of Dreams: Oneirocritica by Artemidorus. Park Ridge, NJ: Noyes PressGoogle Scholar

Wijsman, H. J. 1992. ‘Female Power in Georgics 3.269–70’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 94: 259–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wijsman, H. J. 1993. ‘Ascanius, Gargara and Female Power’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 95: 315–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Williams, G. D. 1991. ‘Conversing after Sunset: A Callimachean Echo in Ovid’s Exile Poetry’, Classical Quarterly 41: 169–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Williams, G. W. 1980. Figures of Thought in Roman Poetry. New Haven: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar

Williams, R. D. 1960. P. Vergili Maronis Aeneidos Liber Quintus. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar

Willis, J. 1994. Ambrosii Theodosii Macrobii Saturnalia. Leipzig: TeubnerGoogle Scholar

Wiltshire, S. F. 1999. ‘The Man Who Was not There: Aeneas and Absence in Aeneid 9’, in: Perkell (ed.), pp. 162–77, 325–8Google Scholar

Winnington-Ingram, R. P. 1971–2. ‘Digna atque indigna relatu: Observations on Aeneid IX’, Proceedings of the Virgil Society 11: 61–74Google Scholar

Wiseman, T. P. 1974. ‘Legendary Genealogies in Late Republican Rome’, Greece and Rome 21: 153–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wiseman, T. P. 1979. Clio’s Cosmetics: Three Studies in Greco-Roman Literature. Leicester University PressGoogle Scholar

Wiseman, T. P. 1986. ‘Monuments and the Roman Annalists’, in: Moxon, I. S., Smart, J. D. and Woodman, A. J. (eds) Past Perspectives: Studies in Greek and Roman Historical Writing. Cambridge University Press, pp. 87–100Google Scholar

Wlosok, A. 1976. ‘Vergils Didotragödie: Ein Beitrag zum Problem des Tragischen in der Aeneis’, in: Görgemanns, H. and Schmidt, E. A. (eds) Studien zum antiken Epos. Meisenheim am Glan: Anton Hain, pp. 228–50Google Scholar

Woodman, A. J. 1983. Velleius Paterculus: The Caesarian and Augustan Narrative (2.41–93). Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Wright, M. R. 1997. ‘“ferox virtus”: Anger in Virgil’s Aeneid’, in: Braund and Gill (eds), pp. 169–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zanker, G. 1992. ‘Sophocle’s Ajax and the Heroic Values of the Iliad’, Classical Quarterly 42: 20–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zanker, P. 1988. The Power of Images in the Age of Augustus. Shapiro, H. A. (trans.). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zetzel, J. E. G. 1997. ‘Rome and its Traditions’, in: Martindale (ed.), pp. 188–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zieske, L. 2010. ‘Iulius Caesar in Vergils Aeneis: Ein Beitrag zu Vergils dichterischer Haltung’, Gymnasium 117: 129–40Google Scholar

Ziogas, I. 2010. ‘The Permanence of Cupid’s Metamorphosis in the Aeneid’, Trends in Classics 2: 150–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zissos, A. 2008. ‘Shades of Virgil: Seneca’s Troades’, Materiali e Discussioni 61: 191–210Google Scholar