Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Epigraph
- Contents
- Preface and Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- 1 The Hellenic City-States System
- 2 New Territorial Concentrations of Power in Antiquity
- 3 The International Relations of Latin Christendom
- 4 The Renaissance City-State System
- 5 The European States-System and the Idea of Civilization
- 6 Cruelty and Compassion in the Age of Empire
- 7 Enlightenment Thought and Global Civilization
- 8 Total Warfare and Decivilizing Processes
- 9 Modernity, Civilization and the Holocaust
- 10 Sovereignty, Citizenship and Humanity in the Global Civilizing Process
- 11 Process Sociology, Civilization and International Society
- Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
6 - Cruelty and Compassion in the Age of Empire
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2017
- Frontmatter
- Epigraph
- Contents
- Preface and Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- 1 The Hellenic City-States System
- 2 New Territorial Concentrations of Power in Antiquity
- 3 The International Relations of Latin Christendom
- 4 The Renaissance City-State System
- 5 The European States-System and the Idea of Civilization
- 6 Cruelty and Compassion in the Age of Empire
- 7 Enlightenment Thought and Global Civilization
- 8 Total Warfare and Decivilizing Processes
- 9 Modernity, Civilization and the Holocaust
- 10 Sovereignty, Citizenship and Humanity in the Global Civilizing Process
- 11 Process Sociology, Civilization and International Society
- Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
In 1798, as Napoleon set off for Egypt, he shouted to his troops: ‘Soldiers, you are undertaking a conquest with incalculable consequences for civilisation’. Unlike the situation when the concept was formed, from now on nations came to consider the process of civilisation as completed within their own societies; they came to see themselves as bearers of an existing or finished civilisation to others, as standard-bearers of expanding civilisation. Of the whole preceding process of civilisation nothing remained in their consciousness except a vague residue. Its outcome was taken simply as an expression of their higher gifts; the fact that, and the question of how, in the course of many centuries, civilised behaviour had been attained was of no interest. And the consciousness of their own superiority, the consciousness of this ‘civilisation’, from now on served at least those nations which become colonial conquerors, and therefore a kind of upper class to large sections of the non-European world, as a justification of their rule, to the same degree that earlier the ancestors of the concept of civilisation, politesse and civilité, had served the courtly-aristocratic upper class as a justification of theirs.
(Elias 2012: 57; italics in original)In the above citation, Elias described a relatively late phase in the process in which first Christian international society and then the members of the European states-system asserted the right to civilize ‘backward’ peoples. Those attitudes were part of the broader movement towards civility and civilization in Western Europe. As noted in a previous chapter, societies did not first develop the practices of civility within their territorial borders and only then reflect on their significance for relations with other peoples. European feelings of cultural superiority and repugnance towards various non-European social practices were not manifestations of a completed civilizing process: they were critical elements in the formation of ‘civilized’ self-images. From the beginning, the idea of civilization ‘which plays down the national differences between peoples’ and stresses ‘what is common to all human beings’ or ‘should be’ from the standpoint of its self-appointed ‘bearers’, gave ‘expression to the continuously expansionist tendency of colonizing groups’ (Elias 2012: 17).
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Violence and Civilization in the Western States-Systems , pp. 226 - 267Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017