Book contents
- The Victorian Cult of Shakespeare
- Cambridge Studies In Nineteenth-Century Literature And Culture
- The Victorian Cult of Shakespeare
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Shakespearean Sermons and Other Pious Texts
- Chapter 2 The Harmonies and Beauties of Devotional Shakespeare Volumes
- Chapter 3 The Sonnets and the Messiah
- Chapter 4 The Authority of the (Missing) Author
- Chapter 5 Shakespearean Clerisies and Perfect Texts
- Conclusion: Concealed Wonders and Choice Treasures
- Notes
- Selected Bibliography
- Index
- Cambridge Studies in Nineteenth-Century Literature and Culture
- References
Selected Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 October 2020
Book contents
- The Victorian Cult of Shakespeare
- Cambridge Studies In Nineteenth-Century Literature And Culture
- The Victorian Cult of Shakespeare
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Shakespearean Sermons and Other Pious Texts
- Chapter 2 The Harmonies and Beauties of Devotional Shakespeare Volumes
- Chapter 3 The Sonnets and the Messiah
- Chapter 4 The Authority of the (Missing) Author
- Chapter 5 Shakespearean Clerisies and Perfect Texts
- Conclusion: Concealed Wonders and Choice Treasures
- Notes
- Selected Bibliography
- Index
- Cambridge Studies in Nineteenth-Century Literature and Culture
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Victorian Cult of ShakespeareBardology in the Nineteenth Century, pp. 196 - 208Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
Selected Bibliography
Abrams, M. H. Natural Supernaturalism: Tradition and Revolution in Romantic Literature. New York: Norton, 1971.Google Scholar
Ainger, Alfred. “A Poet’s Responsibility.” In Shakespeare Sermons: Preached in the Collegiate Church of Stratford-on-Avon, edited by Arbuthnot, George, 37–55. London: Longmans, Green and Co., 1900.Google Scholar
Anderson, Amanda. The Way We Argue Now: A Study in the Cultures of Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Anker, Elizabeth S., and Felski, Rita. Critique and Postcritique. Durham: Duke University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Arbuthnot, George, ed. Shakespeare Sermons: Preached in the Collegiate Church of Stratford-on-Avon. London, New York, and Bombay: Longmans, Green and Co., 1900.Google Scholar
Arnold, Matthew. The Complete Prose Works. Edited by Super, R. H.. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1960.Google Scholar
Asad, Talal. Formations of the Secular: Christianity, Islam, Modernity. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Auerbach, Nina. “Perturbed Spirits: Victorian Actors and Immortality.” In Victorian Shakespeare, Volume 1: Theatre, Drama, and Performance, edited by Marshall, Gail and Poole, Adrian, 192–202. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003.Google Scholar
Babcock, Robert Witbeck. The Genesis of Shakespeare Idolatry: 1766–1799. New York: Russell and Russell, 1964.Google Scholar
Bacon, Alan, ed. The Nineteenth-Century History of English Studies. Aldershot: Ashgate, 1998.Google Scholar
Balfour, Ian. The Rhetoric of Romantic Prophecy. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland. The Rustle of Language. Translated by Richard Howard. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Bate, Jonathan. Shakespeare and the English Romantic Imagination. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Bate, Jonathan. English Literature: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Bates, Katherine Lee. “English at Wellesley College.” In English in American Universities, edited by Payne, William Morton, 141–148. Boston: D. C. Heath & Co., 1895.Google Scholar
Beckwith, Sarah. Shakespeare and the Grammar of Forgiveness. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blair, Kirstie. Form and Faith in Victorian Poetry and Religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloomfield, Jem. Words of Power: Reading Shakespeare and the Bible. Cambridge: Lutterworth Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Boitani, Piero. The Gospel According to Shakespeare. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Boyle, Nicholas. Sacred and Secular Scriptures: A Catholic Approach to Literature. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Bradley, A. C. [Andrew Cecil]. Shakespearean Tragedy; Lectures on Hamlet, Othello, King Lear, Macbeth. London, Macmillan and Co, 1905.Google Scholar
Bradley, A. C. [Andrew Cecil Ideals of Religion: Gifford Lectures Delivered in the University of Glasgow in 1907. London: Macmillan & Co., 1940.Google Scholar
Bradley, Lynne. “Parody, Burlesque, Satire.” In The Cambridge Guide to the Worlds of Shakespeare, edited by Smith, Bruce R., 1273–1281. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Branch, Lori. “Postsecular Studies.” In The Routledge Companion to Literature and Religion, edited by Knight, Mark, 91–101. New York: Routledge, 2016.Google Scholar
Briggs, Charles Augustus. “The Robertson Smith Case.” The Presbyterian Review 1, no. 4 (1880): 737–745.Google Scholar
Brown [Selkirk], J[ames] B[uchan]. Bible Truths with Shakespearean Parallels. London: Whittaker and Co., 1862.Google Scholar
Bullock, Charles. Shakspeare’s Debt to the Bible: With Memorial Illustrations. London: “Hand and Heart” Publishing Offices, n.d.Google Scholar
Burgess, William. Bible Sidelights from Shakspeare; Twenty Lay Homilies from Parallel Texts of the Bible and Shakspeare’s Works. Chicago:n.p., 1913.Google Scholar
Burgon, John W. Inspiration and Interpretation: Seven Sermons by the Rev. John W. Burgon. London: Marshall Brothers, 1905.Google Scholar
Calvo, Clara, and Kahn, Coppélia. Celebrating Shakespeare: Commemoration and Cultural Memory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlyle, Thomas. A Carlyle Reader. Edited by Tennyson, G. B.. Acton, Mass: Copley, 1999.Google Scholar
Carruthers, Jo. England’s Secular Scripture: Islamophobia and the Protestant Aesthetic. London: Continuum, 2011.Google Scholar
Cerezo, Marta. “Charles William Stubbs and Shakespeare: The Incarnation and the English Cult of Literature at the Turn of the Twentieth Century.” Religion and Literature, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Certeau, Michel de. The Practice of Everyday Life. Translated by Steven Rendall. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Chadwick, Owen. The Secularization of the European Mind in the Nineteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Chakrabarty, Dipesh. Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Chesterton, G. K. “Is Shakespeare an Allegory?” The Speaker 4 (May 11, 1901): 166–167.Google Scholar
Chesterton, G. K. The Collected Works of G.K. Chesterton. San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Cixous, Hélène. The Hélène Cixous Reader. Translated by Susan Sellers. New York: Routledge, 2003.Google Scholar
Colton, G. Q. Shakspeare and the Bible: Parallel Passages and Passages Suggested by the Bible with the Religious Sentiments of Shakspeare. New York: Thomas R. Knox & Co., 1888.Google Scholar
Cosslett, Tess. Science and Religion in the 19th Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Courtney, Krystyna Kujawinska, and Mercer, John M., eds. The Globalization of Shakespeare in the Nineteenth Century. Lewiston: Edwin Mellen, 2003.Google Scholar
Cox, John D. “Was Shakespeare a Christian, and If So, What Kind of Christian Was He?” Christianity and Literature 55, no. 4 (2006): 539–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cross, Lezlie C. “Acting in the Paratext: Theatrical Material in Horace Howard Furness’s New Variorum Shakespeare.” Shakespeare Bulletin 33, no. 2 (2015): 191–213.Google Scholar
Cummings, Brian. Mortal Thoughts: Religion, Secularity, & Identity in Shakespeare and Early Modern Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dale, R. W. “Genius the Gift of God; A Sermon on the Tercentenary of the Birth of William Shakspeare, Preached in the Independent Chapel, Stratford-on-Avon.” London: Hamilton, Adams & Co, 1864.Google Scholar
Dávidházi, Péter. The Romantic Cult of Shakespeare: Literary Reception in Anthropological Perspective. Houndmills, Basingstoke: MacMillan, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Quincey, Thomas. The Works of Thomas De Quincey. Edited by Frederick, Burwick. Vol. 3. London: Pickering & Chatto, 2000.Google Scholar
DeCook, Travis, and Galey, Alan, eds. Shakespeare, the Bible, and the Form of the Book: Contested Scriptures. New York: Routledge, 2011.Google Scholar
Denton, William. “Sermon from Shakspeare’s Text: ‘Tongues in Trees, Books in the Running Brooks, / Sermons in Stones, and Good in Every Thing’ Delivered in Music Hall, Boston, Mass.”Wellesley, MA: Denton Publishing Co., 1882.Google Scholar
Desmet, Christy, and Sawyer, Robert. Shakespeare and Appropriation. London: Routledge, 1999.Google Scholar
Dobson, Michael. “Accents Yet Unknown: Canonisation and the Claiming of Julius Caesar.” In The Appropriation of Shakespeare: Post-Renaissance Reconstructions of the Work and the Myth, edited by Marsden, Jean I., 11–28. New York: Harvester, 1992.Google Scholar
Downing, Charles [Clelia] The Messiahship of Shakspeare. London: Greening and Co, 1901.Google Scholar
Dupré, Louis K. The Quest of the Absolute: Birth and Decline of European Romanticism. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eagleton, Terry. Literary Theory: An Introduction. 2nd ed. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Eagleton, Terry. Culture and the Death of God. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Edmondson, Paul, and Wells, Stanley. Shakespeare Beyond Doubt: Evidence, Argument, Controversy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
E[llis], C[harles]. Shakespeare and the Bible: Fifty Sonnets with their Scriptural Harmonies. London: Samuel Bagster & Sons, 1896.Google Scholar
Emerson, Ralph Waldo. “Shakspeare; or, the Poet.” In Shakespeare In America, edited by Shapiro, James, 105–122. New York: Library of America, 2014.Google Scholar
Felperin, Howard. “Bardolatry Then and Now.” In The Appropriation of Shakespeare: Post-Renaissance Reconstructions of the Work and the Myth, edited by Marsden, Jean I., 129–144. New York: Harvester, 1992.Google Scholar
Felski, Rita. The Limits of Critique. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferber, Michael. Romanticism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Fessenden, Tracy. “‘The Secular’ as Opposed to What?” New Literary History 38, no. 4 (2007): 631–636.Google Scholar
Fish, Stanley. “How to Recognize a Poem When You See One.” In The Lyric Theory Reader, edited by Jackson, Virginia and Prins, Yopie, 77–85. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Forshaw, Cha[rle]s F., ed. At Shakespeare’s Shrine: A Poetical Anthology. London: E. Stock, 1904.Google Scholar
Foulkes, Richard. The Shakespeare Tercentenary of 1864. London: Society for Theatre Research, 1984.Google Scholar
Foulkes, Richard. Performing Shakespeare in the Age of Empire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Frye, Northrop. The Great Code: The Bible and Literature. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1982.Google Scholar
Furness, Horace Howard. The Letters of Horace Howard Furness. 2 vols. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1922.Google Scholar
Furnivall, F. J. “The New Shakspere Society: The Founder’s Prospectus Revised.” In The New Shakspere Society’s Transactions: 1874, 6–10. London: Trübner & Co., 1875.Google Scholar
Furnivall, F. J. “Mr. Swinburne and Mr. Spedding – Shakspere’s ‘Henry VIII.’” The Academy 192 (January 8, 1876): 34–35.Google Scholar
Furnivall, F. J. “Mr. Swinburne and Mr. Spedding – Shakspere’s ‘Henry VIII.’” The Academy 195 (January 29, 1876): 98–99.Google Scholar
Geddes, Jennifer and Jakelić, Slavica, eds. “After Secularization.” Hedgehog Review 8, nos. 1 and 2 (2006).Google Scholar
Gibson, James M. “Horace Howard Furness: Book Collector and Library Builder.” In Shakespeare Study Today, edited by Ziegler, Georgianna, 169–90. New York: AMS Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Gibson, James M. The Philadelphia Shakespeare Story: Horace Howard Furness and the Variorum Shakespeare. New York: AMS Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Gilfillan, George. “Shakespeare – a Lecture.” In A Third Gallery of Portraits. New York: Sheldon, Lamport and Blakeman, 1955Google Scholar
Gilman, Arthur. Shakespeare’s Morals: Suggestive Selections, with Brief Collateral Readings and Scriptural References. New York: Dodd, Mead, and Co., 1880.Google Scholar
Goldman, Alan H. Philosophy and the Novel. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Gollancz, Hermann. “Shakespeare and Rabbinic Thought: Sermon Delivered at the Bayswater Synagogue, London.” London: Wertheimer, Lea & Co., 1916.Google Scholar
Gollancz, Israel, ed. A Book of Homage to Shakespeare. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1916.Google Scholar
Grady, Hugh, and Hawkes, Terence, eds. Presentist Shakespeares. London: Routledge, 2007.Google Scholar
Graff, Gerald. Professing Literature: An Institutional History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Grazia, Margreta de. Shakespeare Verbatim. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grazia, Margreta de “Shakespeare in Quotation Marks.” In The Appropriation of Shakespeare: Post-Renaissance Reconstructions of the Work and the Myth, edited by Marsden, Jean I., 57–71. New York: Harvester, 1992.Google Scholar
Greenblatt, Stephen. Shakespearean Negotiations: The Circulation of Social Energy in Renaissance England. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Gross, John, ed. After Shakespeare: An Anthology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Groves, Beatrice. Texts and Traditions: Religion in Shakespeare, 1592–1604. Oxford and New York: Clarendon Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity: Twelve Lectures. Translated by Frederick G. Lawrence. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Han, Younglim. Romantic Shakespeare: From Stage to Page. Madison: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Haskin, Dayton. “Religion and the Rise of English Studies.” In The Routledge Companion to Literature and Religion, edited by Knight, Mark, 27–38. New York: Routledge, 2016.Google Scholar
Herder, Johann Gottfried. Theologische Schriften. Edited by Zippert, Thomas. Johann Gottfried Herder Werke. Frankfurt: Deutscher Klassiker Verlag, 1994.Google Scholar
Holderness, Graham. Cultural Shakespeare: Essays in the Shakespeare Myth. Hatfield: University of Hertfordshire Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Holderness, Graham, ed. The Shakespeare Myth. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Holderness, Graham, Porter, Stanley E., and Banks, Carol. “Biblebable.” In The Renaissance Text: Theory, Editing, Textuality, edited by Murphy, Andrew, 154–176. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Holland, Peter. “David Garrick: Saints, Temples and Jubilees.” In Celebrating Shakespeare: Commemoration and Cultural Memory, edited by Calvo, Clara and Kahn, Coppélia, 15–37. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Huang, Alexander Cheng-Yuan. Chinese Shakespeares: Two Centuries of Cultural Exchange. New York: Columbia University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Hughes, Ted. Shakespeare and the Goddess of Complete Being. London: Faber & Faber, 1992.Google Scholar
Hurley, Michael. Faith in Poetry: Verse Style as a Mode of Religious Belief. New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2018.Google Scholar
Irving, Washington. “Stratford-on-Avon.” In Shakespeare In America, edited by Shapiro, James, 16–35. New York: Library of America, 2014.Google Scholar
Jackson, Virginia, and Prins, Yopie. “General Introduction.” In The Lyric Theory Reader: A Critical Anthology. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
James, William. The Varieties of Religious Experience: A Study in Human Nature. New York: Penguin, 1982.Google Scholar
Jensen, Phebe. Religion and Revelry in Shakespeare’s Festive World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Jerdan, William, ed. “Arts and Sciences: Shakespeare.” The Literary Gazette, no. 1032 (October 29, 1836): 698.Google Scholar
Kahan, Jeffrey. Shakespiritualism: Shakespeare and the Occult, 1850–1950. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.Google Scholar
Kahan, Jeffrey. “A Brief History of Stylometrics.” ELH 82, no. 3 (2015): 815–844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kastan, David Scott. Shakespeare and the Book. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Kastan, David Scott A Will to Believe: Shakespeare and Religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, Michael W. “The Religious, the Secular, and Literary Studies: Rethinking the Secularization Narrative in Histories of the Profession.” New Literary History 38, no. 4 (2007): 607–628.Google Scholar
Kawachi, Yoshiko. “Shakespeare in Nineteenth-Century Japan.” In The Globalization of Shakespeare in the Nineteenth Century, edited by Courtney, Krystyna Kujawinska and Mercer, John M.. Lewiston: Edwin Mellen, 2003.Google Scholar
Keble, John. Keble’s Lectures on Poetry, 1832–1841. 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1912.Google Scholar
Kilbride, Laura. Swinburne’s Style: An Experiment in Verse History. Cambridge: Legenda, 2018.Google Scholar
King, Joshua. Imagined Spiritual Communities in Britain’s Age of Print. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Joshua “The Inward Turn: The Role of Matthew Arnold.” In The Routledge Companion to Literature and Religion, edited by Knight, Mark, 15–26. New York: Routledge, 2016.Google Scholar
Knight, Jeffrey Todd. Bound to Read: Compilations, Collections, and the Making of Renaissance Literature. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Knight, Mark, and Mason, Emma. Nineteenth-Century Religion and Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Kugel, James L. “Poets and Prophets: An Overview.” In Poetry and Prophecy: The Beginnings of a Literary Tradition, 1–25. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Kugel, James L. How to Read the Bible: A Guide to Scripture, Then and Now. New York: Free Press, 2007.Google Scholar
LaCocque, André, and Ricoeur, Paul. Thinking Biblically: Exegetical and Hermeneutical Studies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Laffan, R. S. de Courcy. “Shakespeare, the Prophet.” In Shakespeare Sermons: Preached in the Collegiate Church of Stratford-on-Avon, edited by Arbuthnot, George, 22–36. London: Longmans, Green and Co., 1900.Google Scholar
Landow, George P. Victorian Types, Victorian Shadows : Biblical Typology in Victorian Literature, Art, and Thought. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1980.Google Scholar
Lanier, Douglas. “Shakespeare and Popular Culture.” In The Cambridge Guide to the Worlds of Shakespeare, edited by Smith, Bruce R., 1261–1273. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
LaPorte, Charles. Victorian Poets and the Changing Bible. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 2011.Google Scholar
LaPorte, Charles. “Victorian Literature, Religion, and Secularization.” Literature Compass 10, no. 3 (2013): 277–287.Google Scholar
“Post-Secular English Studies and Romantic Cults of Authorship.” In Constructing Nineteenth-Century Religion, edited by King, Joshua and Werner, Winter, 246–261. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Larsen, Timothy. A People of One Book: The Bible and the Victorians. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Lecourt, Sebastian, and LaPorte, Charles. “Introduction: Nineteenth-Century Literature, New Religious Movements, and Secularization,” Nineteenth-Century Literature 73, no. 2 (2018): 147–160.Google Scholar
Loewenstein, David and Witmore, Michael, eds. Shakespeare and Early Modern Religion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Lootens, Tricia. Lost Saints: Silence, Gender, and Victorian Literary Canonization. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1996.Google Scholar
Lynch, Deidre. Loving Literature. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Lyons, Sara. Algernon Swinburne and Walter Pater: Victorian Aestheticism, Doubt and Secularisation. Oxford: Legenda, 2015.Google Scholar
Mahmood, Saba. Religious Difference in a Secular Age: A Minority Report. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
[Makay, Charles]. “Shakespeare and the Bible.” The London Review 8, no. 199 (1864): 445.Google Scholar
Marder, Louis. His Exits and His Entrances; the Story of Shakespeare’s Reputation. Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1963.Google Scholar
Marsden, Jean I., ed. The Appropriation of Shakespeare: Post-Renaissance Reconstructions of the Work and the Myth. New York: Harvester, 1992.Google Scholar
Marsh, Joss. Word Crimes: Blasphemy, Culture, and Literature in Nineteenth-Century England. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Marshall, Gail and Shaw, Philip. “Shakespeare and Poetry.” In Shakespeare in the Nineteenth Century, edited by Marshall, Gail, 113–128. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Marshall, Gail, ed. Shakespeare in the Nineteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Marshall, Gail, and Poole, Adrian, eds. Victorian Shakespeare. 2 vols. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003.Google Scholar
Mason, Emma. “Religion, the Bible, and Literature in the Victorian Age.” In The Oxford Handbook of Victorian Literary Culture, edited by John, Juliet, 331–349. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
McDonald, Rónán. The Values of Literary Studies: Critical Institutions: Scholarly Agendas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
McEachern, Claire. Believing in Shakespeare: Studies in Longing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
McKelvy, William R. The English Cult of Literature: Devoted Readers, 1774–1880. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 2007.Google Scholar
McLeod, Hugh. Religion and Society in England, 1850–1914. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1996.Google Scholar
McLuskie, Kate, and Rumbold, Kate Louise. Cultural Value in Twenty-First-Century England: The Case of Shakespeare. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Moore, Colette. Quoting Speech in Early English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Murphy, Andrew. Shakespeare for the People: Working-Class Readers, 1800–1900. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Nicole, Eugène. “Édition et Genèse de ‘L’Adoration Perpétuelle’.” Bulletin d’informations Proustiennes 45 (2015): 75–88.Google Scholar
Norton, David. A History of the English Bible as Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Olsen, Stein Haugrom. The End of Literary Theory. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Pascal, R[oy]. Shakespeare in Germany, 1740–1815. Reprint ed. New York: Octagon Books, 1971.Google Scholar
Payne, William Morton, ed. English in American Universities. Boston: D. C. Heath & Co., 1895.Google Scholar
Pechter, Edward. Shakespeare Studies Today: Romanticism Lost. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pecora, Vincent P. Secularization Without End : Beckett, Mann, Coetzee. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Peterson, William S. Interrogating the Oracle; A History of the London Browning Society. Athens: Ohio University Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Pfau, Thomas. Minding the Modern: Human Agency, Intellectual Traditions, and Responsible Knowledge. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Pownall, Alfred. Shakspere Weighed in an Even Balance. London: Saunders, Otley, and Co. 1864.Google Scholar
Price, Leah. The Anthology and the Rise of the Novel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Price, Thomas, ed. The Wisdom and Genius of Shakspeare. Scott, Webster, and Geary, 1838.Google Scholar
Prickett, Stephen. Words and the Word: Language, Poetics, and Biblical Interpretation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Prickett, Stephen. Origins of Narrative: The Romantic Appropriation of the Bible. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Rees, James. Shakespeare and the Bible. Philadelphia: Claxton, Remsen, and Haffelfinger, 1876.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul. The Philosophy of Paul Ricoeur: An Anthology of His Work. Edited by Reagan, Charles E. and Stewart, David. Boston: Beacon Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Roberts, Adam, ed. Coleridge: Lectures on Shakespeare (1811–1819). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Robertson, Michael. Worshipping Walt: The Whitman Disciples. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Rosman, Doreen. The Evolution of the English Churches 1500–2000. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Rozmovits, Linda. Shakespeare and the Politics of Culture in Late Victorian England. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Rumbold, Kate. “Shakespeare Anthologized.” In The Edinburgh Companion to Shakespeare and the Arts, edited by Burnett, Mark Thornton, Streete, Adrian, and Wray, Ramona, 88–105. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Rumbold, Kate. Shakespeare and the Eighteenth-Century Novel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Ryan, Robert M. Charles Darwin and the Church of Wordsworth. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Sawyer, Robert. Victorian Appropriations of Shakespeare: George Eliot, A. C. Swinburne, Robert Browning, and Charles Dickens. Cranbury, NJ: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Scadding[, Henry]. “Shakespeare, the Seer—the Interpreter: The Address Delivered before the St. George’s Society of Toronto, in the Cathedral Church of St. James, April the 23rd, 1864.” Toronto: Copp, Clark Company, 1897.Google Scholar
Scheil, Katherine West. She Hath Been Reading: Women and Shakespeare Clubs in America. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Schleiermacher, Friedrich. On Religion: Speeches to Its Cultured Despisers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Schoch, Richard W. Not Shakespeare: Bardolatry and Burlesque in the Nineteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Schoenbaum, S[amuel]. Shakespeare’s Lives. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Scholes, Robert. Textual Power: Literary Theory and the Teaching of English. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Scholes, Robert. The Rise and Fall of English: Reconstructing English as a Discipline. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Scholes, Robert. English after the Fall: From Literature to Textuality. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Schueller, Herbert M., ed. The Persistence of Shakespeare Idolatry: Essays in Honor of Robert W. Babcock. Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1964.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Regina. Loving Justice, Living Shakespeare. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Scott-Douglass, Amy. “Shakespeare Spin-Offs.” In The Cambridge Guide to the Worlds of Shakespeare, edited by Smith, Bruce R., vol. 2, 1281–1290. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky. Touching Feeling: Affect, Pedagogy, Performativity. Durham: Duke University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Shaheen, Naseeb. Biblical References in Shakespeare’s Plays. Newark: University of Delaware Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Shapiro, James. Contested Will: Who Wrote Shakespeare? New York: Simon and Schuster, 2010.Google Scholar
Shaw, W. David. The Ghost Behind the Masks: The Victorian Poets and Shakespeare. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Shea, Victor, and Whitla, William, eds. Essays and Reviews: The 1860 Text and Its Reading. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Sillars, Stuart. The Illustrated Shakespeare, 1709–1875. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Sillars, Stuart. Shakespeare, Time and the Victorians: A Pictorial Exploration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Sillars, Stuart. Shakespeare and the Victorians. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Singh, Jyotsna G., and Shahani, Gitanjali G.. “Postcolonial Shakespeare Revisited.” Shakespeare 6, no. 1 (2010): 127–138.Google Scholar
Smith, Bruce R.“Shakespeare’s Sonnets and the History of Sexuality: A Reception History.” In A Companion to Shakespeare’s Works, Volume 4, edited by Dutton, Richard and Howard, Jean E., 4–26. Malden: Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 2005.Google Scholar
Smith, Bruce R., ed. Cambridge Guide to the Worlds of Shakespeare, 2 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Smith, Charles Alphonso. In How to Study Shakespeare: With Articles on General Literature and Directions for Forming and Conducting Study Circles.New York: University Society Incorporated, 1907.Google Scholar
Smith, William Robertson. “Bible.” In Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 3. Edinburgh: Adam and Charles Black, 1875.Google Scholar
Soskice, Janet. The Sisters of Sinai: How Two Lady Adventurers Discovered the Hidden Gospels. New York: Vintage Books, 2010.Google Scholar
Spurgeon, Charles Haddon. Morning by Morning: Or, Daily Readings for the Family or the Closet. New York: Sheldon and Co., 1866.Google Scholar
Stavisky, Aron Y. Shakespeare and the Victorians: Roots of Modern Criticism. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Stubbs, C. W. “A Thanksgiving for Shakespeare.” In Shakespeare Sermons: Preached in the Collegiate Church of Stratford-on-Avon, edited by Arbuthnot, George, 70–93. London: Longmans, Green and Co., 1900.Google Scholar
Stubbs, Charles William. The Christ of English Poetry. London : J. M. Dent & Co., 1906.Google Scholar
Sturgess, Kim C. Shakespeare and the American Nation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Swinburne, Algernon Charles. “The Three Stages of Shakespeare.” Fortnightly Review 17, no. 101 (1875): 613–632.Google Scholar
Swinburne, Algernon Charles Major Poems and Selected Prose. Edited by McGann, Jerome J. and Sligh, Charles. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Swinburne, Charles Alfred. Sacred & Shakespearian Affinities: Being Analogies between the Writings of the Psalmists and of Shakespeare. London: Bickers, 1890.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles.Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Taylor, Gary. Reinventing Shakespeare: A Cultural History, from the Restoration to the Present. New York: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1989.Google Scholar
Thakur, Vikram Singh. Shakespeare and Indian Theatre. New Delhi: Bloomsbury Academic, 2020.Google Scholar
Thomas, Julia. Shakespeare’s Shrine: The Bard’s Birthplace and the Invention of Stratford-upon-Avon. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Throsby, Corin. “Commonplace Book.” In The Encyclopedia of Victorian Literature, edited by Felluga, Dino Franco, Gilbert, Pamela, and Hughes, Linda K., doi:10.1002/9781118405376.wbevl070.Malden: Blackwell Publishing, 2015.Google Scholar
Timmins, J. F. The Poet-Priest: Shakespearian Sermons, Compiled for the Use of Students and Public Readers. London: James Blackwood, 1884.Google Scholar
Tolstoy, Leo. Tolstoy on Shakespeare. Translated by V[ladimir] Tchertkoff and I. F. M. New York and London: Funk & Wagnalls, 1906.Google Scholar
Tomko, Michael. Beyond the Willing Suspension of Disbelief: Poetic Faith from Coleridge to Tolkien. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2016.Google Scholar
Trench, Richard Chenevix. “Every Good Gift from Above: Being a Sermon Presented to the Parish Church of Stratford-Upon-Avon on Sunday, April 24, 1864, at the Celebration of the Tercentenary of Shakespeare’s Birth.” London: Macmillan and Co., 1864.Google Scholar
Turner, James. Philology: The Forgotten Origins of the Modern Humanities. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Vallée, Claude. “La Religion Dévoyée.” In Entretiens Sur Marcel Proust, edited by Cattaui, Georges and Kolb, Philip, 168–193. Paris: Mouton & Co., 1966.Google Scholar
Vaughan, L. J. Sermons from Shakespeare. Janesville, WI: C. H. Bartlett Company, 1909.Google Scholar
Velz, John W. “On Bards, Bibles, and Bears: On Shakespeare and Religion.” Shakespeare Newsletter 54, no. 4 (2004): 87.Google Scholar
Viswanathan, Gauri. Masks of Conquest: Literary Study and British Rule in India. New York: Columbia University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Viswanathan, Gauri. “Secularism in the Framework of Heterodoxy.” PMLA 123, no. 2 (2008): 466–476.Google Scholar
Vries, Hent de. Philosophy and the Turn to Religion. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Warner, Michael. “Uncritical Reading.” In Polemic: Critical or Uncritical, edited by Gallop, Jane, 13–38. New York: Routledge, 2004.Google Scholar
Watson, Frederick Beilby. Religious and Moral Sentences Culled from the Works of Shakespeare, Compared with Sacred Passages Drawn from Holy Writ. Boston and Cambridge: J. Munroe and Company, 1859.Google Scholar
Wheeler, Michael. The Old Enemies: Catholic and Protestant in Nineteenth-Century English Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Williams, James Leon. The Home and Haunts of Shakespeare. New York: C. Scribner’s Sons, 1894.Google Scholar
Wadsworth, Frank W., The Poacher from Stratford. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1958Google Scholar
Wordsworth, Charles. Man’s Excellency a Cause of Praise and Thankfulness to God: A Sermon Preached at Stratford-Upon-Avon on Sunday, April 24, 1864. London: Smith, Elder, & Co., 1864.Google Scholar
Wordsworth, Charles. Shakspeare’s Knowledge and Use of the Bible. 4th ed. London & Sydney: Eden, Remington & Co., 1892.Google Scholar
Yeats, George. “Shakespeare’s Victorian Legacy: Text as Monument and Emendation as Desecration in the Mid-Nineteenth Century.” Victorian Literature and Culture 40 (2012): 469–486.Google Scholar
Young, Alan R. Punch and Shakespeare in the Victorian Era. Oxford and New York: Peter Lang, 2007.Google Scholar