Book contents
- The New Cambridge Shakespeare
- The New Cambridge Shakespeare
- The Two Gentlemen of Verona
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Illustrations
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations and Conventions
- Introduction
- Note on the text
- The Two Gentlemen of Verona
- Textual Analysis
- Appendix: A Further Note on Stage Directions
- Reading List
- References
Reading List
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 August 2019
Book contents
- The New Cambridge Shakespeare
- The New Cambridge Shakespeare
- The Two Gentlemen of Verona
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Illustrations
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations and Conventions
- Introduction
- Note on the text
- The Two Gentlemen of Verona
- Textual Analysis
- Appendix: A Further Note on Stage Directions
- Reading List
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Two Gentlemen of Verona , pp. 167 - 169Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2012
References
Adelman, Janet. ‘Male bonding in Shakespeare’s comedies’, in Shakespeare’s ‘Rough Magic’: Renaissance Essays in Honor of Barber, C. L., ed. Erickson, Peter and Kahn, Coppélia, 1985, pp. 73–103Google Scholar
Beckermann, Bernard. ‘Shakespeare’s dramaturgy and binary form’, Theatre Journal 33 (1981), 5–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boehrer, Bruce. Shakespeare Among the Animals: Nature and Society in the Drama of Early Modern England, 2002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowden, Betsy. ‘Latin pedagogical plays and the rape scene in The Two Gentlemen of Verona’, English Language Notes 41 (2003), 30–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradbrook, Muriel C. Shakespeare and Elizabethan Poetry: A Study of His Earlier Work in Relation of the Poetry of the Time, 1951Google Scholar
Caroll, William C. ‘“And love you ’gainst the nature of love”: Ovid, rape, and The Two Gentlemen of Verona’, in Shakespeare’s Ovid: The Metamorphoses in the Plays and Poems, ed. Taylor, A. B., 2000, pp. 49–65Google Scholar
Evans, Maurice. ‘Deconstructing Shakespeare’s comedies’, in Alternative Shakespeares, ed. Drakakis, John, 1985, pp. 67–94Google Scholar
Ewbank, Inga-Stina. ‘“Were man but constant, he were perfect”: constancy and consistency in The Two Gentlemen of Verona’, in Shakespearian Comedy, Stratford-upon-Avon Studies 14, 1972, pp. 31–57Google Scholar
Fudge, Erica. ‘“The dog is himself”: humans, animals, and self-control in The Two Gentlemen of Verona’, in How to do Things with Shakespeare: New Approaches, New Essays, ed. Laurie, E. Maguire, 2008, pp. 185–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabler, Hans W. ‘Experiment and parody in Shakespeare’s early plays’, Studia Neophilologica 46 (1974), 159–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Girard, René. ‘Love delights in praises: a reading of The Two Gentlemen of Verona’, Philosophy and Literature 13 (1989), 231–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godshalk, William L. ‘The structural unity of The Two Gentlemen of Verona’, SP 66 (1969), 168–81Google Scholar
Goldberg, Jonathan. Voice Terminal Echo: Postmodernism and English Renaissance Texts, 1986Google Scholar
Guy-Bray, Stephen. ‘Shakespeare and the invention of the heterosexual’, Early Modern Literary Studies, Special Issue 16 (October 2007), 12.1–28Google Scholar
Harrison, T. P. Jr. ‘Shakespeare and Montemayor’s Diana’, Texas University Studies in English 5 and 6 (1925–6), 72–120Google Scholar
Holmberg, Arthur. ‘The Two Gentlemen of Verona: Shakespearean comedy as a rite of passage’, Queen’s Quarterly 90 (1983), 33–44Google Scholar
Hunter, G. K. John Lily: The Humanist as Courtier, 1962 (see his chapter ‘Lily and Shakespeare’)Google Scholar
Masten, Jeffrey. ‘The Two Gentlemen of Verona’, in A Companion to Shakespeare’s Works, Vol. iii: The Comedies, ed. Dutton, Richard and Howard, Jean E., 2003, pp. 266–88Google Scholar
Maurer, Margaret. ‘Figure, place, and the end of The Two Gentlemen of Verona’, Style 23 (1989), 405–29Google Scholar
Morse, Ruth. ‘Two Gentlemen and the cult of friendship’, Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 84 (1983), 214–24Google Scholar
Phialas, Peter G. Shakespeare’s Romantic Comedies: The Development of Their Form and Meaning, 1966Google Scholar
Priest, Dale J. ‘Julia, Petruchio, Rosalind, Viola: Shakespeare’s subjunctive leads’, Massachusetts Studies in English 9 (1984), 32–51Google Scholar
Rackin, Phyllis. ‘Shakespeare’s crossdressing comedies’, in A Companion to Shakespeare’s Works, Vol. iii: The Comedies, ed. Dutton, Richard and Howard, Jean E., 2003, pp. 114–36Google Scholar
Rivlin, Elizabeth. ‘Mimetic service in The Two Gentlemen of Verona’, English Literary History 72 (2005), 105–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schroeder-Haslem, Lori. ‘“O me, the word choose!” Female voice and catechetical ritual in The Two Gentlemen of Verona and The Merchant of Venice’, S.St. 22 (1994), 122–40Google Scholar
Simmons, J. L. ‘Coming out in Shakespeare’s The Two Gentlemen of Verona’, English Literary History 60 (1993), 857–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slights, Camille W. ‘The Two Gentlemen of Verona and the courtesy book tradition’, S.ST. 16 (1983), 13–31Google Scholar
Wales, Julia G. ‘Shakespeare’s use of English and foreign elements in the setting of The Two Gentlemen of Verona’, Transactions of the Wisconsin Academy of Sciences, Arts & Letters 27 (1932), 85–125Google Scholar