1 - Theoretical perspectives on bottom-up and top-down interactions across ecosystems
from Part I - Theory
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 May 2015
Summary
Introduction
The study of the determinants of biomass pyramids (i.e., the patterns of biomass of organisms at different trophic levels of an ecosystem) within and across ecosystems is an enduring endeavor in the ecological sciences (Gripenberg and Roslin, 2007; Gruner et al., 2008). This classic ecological problem still fascinates ecologists worldwide and the lively debate on this question is an attestation of the complexity of ecological systems. The ecological literature reveals two main perspectives for predicting biomass pyramids; one perspective emphasizes the role of resources such as inorganic nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) or primary producers in determining the biomass of higher trophic levels, and the other perspective emphasizes the role of consumers such as herbivores and predators in determining the biomass of lower trophic levels (Oksanen and Oksanen, 2000; Gruner et al., 2008).
The resource-based hypothesis states that organisms are resource-limited, and therefore resources determine the shape of biomass pyramids (Elton, 1927; Lindeman, 1942; White, 1978; McQueen et al., 1986). Consistent with Elton's (1927) perspective, Lindeman (1942) and others (e.g., White, 1978; McQueen et al., 1986) argued that inorganic nutrients and solar radiation limit plant growth and subsequently the potential transfer of energy and nutrients from lower trophic levels to higher trophic levels in ecosystems. This bottom-up perspective has been expanded to consider the role of plant defense in limiting herbivory (Strong, 1992; Polis and Strong, 1996; also, see Chapter 8 and Chapter 13).
In contrast, the consumer-based hypothesis (i.e., Hairston Smith Slobodkin (HSS) Hypothesis) states that organisms are consumer-regulated, and therefore higher-level consumers determine biomass pyramids (Hairston et al., 1960). Oksanen et al. (1981) further developed the consumer-regulated framework by developing the exploitation ecosystem hypothesis (EEH), which suggests that top-down control of ecosystems will vary along environmental gradients. Top-down perspectives gained additional support through Carpenter et al.'s (1985) empirical evidence of trophic cascades, whereby top predators have indirect positive effects on non-adjacent trophic levels.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Trophic EcologyBottom-up and Top-down Interactions across Aquatic and Terrestrial Systems, pp. 3 - 28Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2015
References
, , , et al. (2012). Roe deer may markedly alter forest nitrogen and phosphorous budgets across Europe. Oikos, 121, 1271–1278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2008). Resources from another place and time: responses to pulses in a spatially subsidized system. Ecology, 89, 660–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1989). Coupling in predator prey dynamics – ratio-dependence. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 139, 311–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2005). Tangled webs: reciprocal flows of invertebrate prey link streams and riparian zones. Freshwater Biology, 50, 201–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2006). Asymmetry in community regulation: effects of predators and productivity. Ecology, 87, 2813–2820.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , , et al. (2005). What determines the strength of a trophic cascade?Ecology, 86, 528–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1996). A meta-analysis of the freshwater trophic cascade. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 93, 7723–7726.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(2006). Dispersal and species diversity: a meta-analysis. American Naturalist, 167, 913–924.Google ScholarPubMed
and (1993). The Trophic Cascade in Lake Ecosystems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1985). Cascading trophic interactions and lake productivity. Bioscience, 35, 634–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1999). Patterns in the fate of production in plant communities. American Naturalist, 154, 449–468.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , , et al. (2009). Producer nutritional quality controls ecosystem trophic structure. PLoS One, 4, e4929.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (2013). Plant-herbivore-decomposer stoichiometric mismatches and nutrient cycling in ecosystems. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 280, 2012–2453.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , and (2007). Predation risk affects reproductive physiology and demography of elk. Science, 315, 960.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , and (2007). Trophic casades triggered by overfishing reveal possible mechanisms of ecosystem regime shifts. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 104, 10518–10523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1998). Grazing optimization and nutrient cycling: when do herbivores enhance plant production?Ecology, 79, 2242–2252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1992). Dynamics of Nutrient Cycling and Food Webs. New York: Chapman and Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2005). Spatial variation in the relative strength of top-down and bottom-up forces: causes and consequences for phytophagous and insect populations. Annales Zoologici Fennici, 42, 295–311.Google Scholar
, , , et al. (2007). The functional role of biodiversity in ecosystems: incorporating trophic complexity. Ecology Letters, 10, 522–538.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , , et al. (2007). Global analysis of nitrogen and phosphorous limitation of primary producers in freshwater, marine and terrestrial ecosystems. Ecology Letters, 10, 1135–1142.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(2004). Distributed control in ecological networks. Ecological Modelling, 179, 235–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2011). Sea to sky: impacts of residual salmon-derived nutrients on estuarine breeding bird communities. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 278, 3081–3088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , et al. (2005). Dynamics of a boreal lake ecosystem during a long-term manipulation of top predators. Ecosystems, 8, 603–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , et al. (2010). Miigratory fishes as material and process subsidies in riverine ecosystems. American Fisheries Society Symposium, 73, 559–592.Google Scholar
, and (2007). The ups and downs of trophic control in continental shelf ecosystems. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 22, 236–242.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(1977). The regulation of plant communities by food chains exploiting them. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 20, 169–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2005). Ecological responses to simulated benthic-derived nutrient subsidies mediated by omnivorous fish. Freshwater Biology, 50, 1864–1881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2003a). Inter-year carryover effects of a nutrient pulse on Spartina plants, herbivores, and natural enemies. Ecology, 84, 2692–2707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2003b). Seasonal shift from bottom-up to top-down impact in phytophagous insect populations. Oecologia, 134, 487–495.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , and (2010). Source and sink dynamics in meta-ecosystems. Ecology, 91, 2172–2184.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (2007). Up or down in space? Uniting the bottom-up versus top-down paradigm and spatial ecology. Oikos, 116, 181–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003). The impact of variable stoichiometry on predator-prey interactions: a multinutrient approach. American Naturalist, 162, 29–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , , et al. (2008). A cross-system synthesis of consumer and nutrient resource control on producer biomass. Ecology Letters, 11, 740–755.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, and (1960). Community structure, population control, and competition. American Naturalist, 94, 421–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (2007). Food quality, nutrient limitation of secondary production, and the strength of trophic cascades. Oikos, 116, 1128–1143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (1998). Top-down versus bottom-up and the Ruritanian bean bug. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 95, 10661–10664.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(2004). Transients: the key to long-term ecological understanding?Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 19, 39–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(2010). Timescales, dynamics, and ecological understanding. Ecology, 91, 3471–3480.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(2012). Temporally varying resources amplify the importance of resource input in ecological populations. Biology Letters, 8, 1067–1069.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (2010). Herbivore physiological response to predation risk and implications for ecosystem nutrient dynamics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 107, 15503–15507.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (2006). Keystone interactions: salmon and bear in riparian forests of Alaska. Ecosystems, 9, 167–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2004). Consumer effects decline with prey diversity. Ecology Letters, 7, 192–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2011). Impacts of salmon on riparian plant diversity. Science, 331, 1609–1612.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(1977). Predation, apparent competition, and the structure of prey communities. Theoretical Population Biology, 12, 197–229.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(2008). Theoretical perspectives on resource pulses. Ecology, 89, 671–681.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, and (2009). Large predators and biogeochemical hotspots: brown bear (Ursus arctos) predation on salmon alters nitrogen cycling in riparian soils. Ecological Research, 24, 1125–1135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2006). Nutrient-limited food webs with up to three trophic levels: feasibility, stability, assembly rules, and effects of nutrient enrichment. Theoretical Population Biology, 69, 48–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (1992). Playing chutes and ladders – heterogeneity and the relative roles of bottom-up and top-down forces in natural communities. Ecology, 73, 724–732.Google Scholar
and (1998). Food web stability: the influence of trophic flows across habitats. American Naturalist, 152, 460–469.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, and (2013). Seasonal, inter-annual and long-term variation in top-down versus bottom-up regulation of primary production. Oikos, 122, 223–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2008). Nitrogen limitation of net primary productivity in terrestrial ecosystems is globally distributed. Ecology, 89, 371–379.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (2008). Subsidy hypothesis and strength of trophic cascades across ecosystems. Ecology Letters, 11, 1147–1156.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (2009). Disentangling multiple predator effects in biodiversity and ecosystem functioning research. Journal of Animal Ecology, 78, 695–698.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (2010). Consumer-mediated recycling and cascading trophic interactions. Ecology, 91, 2162–2171.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (2012). Dynamics of reciprocal pulsed subsidies in local and meta-ecosystems. Ecosystems, 15, 48–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2012). Predation risk, stoichiometric plasticity and ecosystem elemental cycling. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 279, 4183–4191.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (2007). Oscillating trophic control induces community reorganization in a marine ecosystem. Ecology Letters, 10, 1124–1134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1995). Consumers as maximizers of matter and energy-flow in ecosystems. American Naturalist, 145, 22–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2010). From Populations to Ecosystems: Theoretical Foundations for a New Ecological Synthesis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2004). Spatial flows and the regulation of ecosystems. The American Naturalist, 163, 606–615.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , , et al. (2013). Unifying sources and sinks in ecology and Earth sciences. Biological Reviews, 88, 365–379.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, and (2003). Meta-ecosystems: a theoretical framework for a spatial ecosystem ecology. Ecology Letters, 6, 673–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2007). Meta-analysis: trophic level, habitat, and productivity shape the food web effects of resource subsidies. Ecology, 88, 140–148.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , and (2010). Nutrient flows between ecosystems can destabilize simple food chains. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 266, 162–174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , , et al. (2011). Linking community and ecosystem dynamics through spatial ecology. Ecology Letters, 14, 313–323.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (2009). The more food webs change, the more they stay the same. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 364, 1789–1801.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, and (2005). The dynamics of spatially coupled food webs. Ecology Letters, 8, 513–523.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, and (2009). Predator shadows: complex life histories as generators of spatially patterned indirect interactions across ecosystems. Oikos, 118, 87–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , et al. (2008). Fish distributions and nutrient cycling in streams: can fish create biogeochemical hotspots?Ecology, 89, 2335–2346.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, and (1986). Trophic relationships in fresh-water pelagic ecosystems. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 43, 1571–1581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1976). Species-diversity gradients – synthesis of roles of predation, competition, and temporal heterogeneity. American Naturalist, 110, 351–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , et al. (2004). Detritus, trophic dynamics and biodiversity. Ecology Letters, 7, 584–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , et al. (2007). Biotic control of stream fluxes: Spawning salmon drive nutrient and matter export. Ecology, 88, 1278–1291.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (2002). Indirect effects of aquatic insect emergence on a terrestrial insect population through predation by birds. Ecology Letters, 5, 333–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , and (2007). Cascading effects of the loss of apex predatory sharks from a coastal ocean. Science, 315, 1846–1850.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, and (1999). Terrestrial-aquatic linkages: riparian arthropod inputs alter trophic cascades in a stream food web. Ecology, 80, 2435–2441.Google Scholar
and (1997). Alternatives to resilience for measuring the responses of ecological systems to perturbations. Ecology, 78, 653–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1988). Fish in the structure and function of freshwater ecosystems: a “top-down” view. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 45, 361–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (1981). Exploitation ecosystems in gradients of primary productivity. American Naturalist, 118, 240–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2000). The logic and realism of the hypothesis of exploitation ecosystems. American Naturalist, 155, 703–723.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , and (1999). Trophic cascades revealed in diverse ecosystems. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 14, 483–488.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(1999). Trophic cascades: abiding heterogeneity and the trophic level concept at the end of the road. Oikos, 85, 385–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1999). Why are parts of the world green? Multiple factors control productivity and the distribution of biomass. Oikos, 86, 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1997). Toward an integration of landscape and food web ecology: The dynamics of spatially subsidized food webs. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 28, 289–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1995). Extraordinarily high spider densities on islands: flow of energy from the marine to terrestrial food webs and the absence of predation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 92, 4382–4386.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (1996). Food web complexity and community dynamics. American Naturalist, 147, 813–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (2013). How to measure top-down vs bottom-up effects: a new population metric and its calibration on Daphnia. Oikos, 122, 1177–1186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2011). Cross-ecosystem differences in stability and the principle of energy flux. Ecology Letters, 14, 733–740.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (2005). Linking wolves and plants: Aldo Leopold on trophic cascades. Bioscience, 55, 613–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (2006). Structural asymmetry and the stability of diverse food webs. Nature, 442, 265–269.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (1998). The distribution and abundance of coyotes: the effects of allochthonous food subsidies from the sea. Ecology, 79, 998–1007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1993). Top-down and bottom-up control of stream periphyton: effects of nutrients and herbivores. Ecology, 74, 1264–1280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1971). Paradox of enrichment – destabilization of exploitation ecosystems in ecological time. Science, 171, 385–387.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, and (2000). Trophic cascades in terrestrial systems: a review of the effects of carnivore removals on plants. American Naturalist, 155, 141–153.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, and (2010). Predator control of ecosystem nutrient dynamics. Ecology Letters, 13, 1199–1209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, and (2004). Trophic cascades: the primacy of trait-mediated indirect interactions. Ecology Letters, 7, 153–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2008). Crossing habitat boundaries: coupling dynamics of ecosystems through complex life cycles. Ecology Letters, 11, 576–587.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , , et al. (2002). A cross-ecosystem comparison of the strength of trophic cascades. Ecology Letters, 5, 785–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2006). All wet or dried up? Real differences between aquatic and terrestrial food webs. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 273, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (2005). The strength of trophic cascades across ecosystems: predictions from allometry and energetics. Journal of Animal Ecology, 74, 1029–1038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2002). Ecological Stoichiometry: The Biology of Elements From Molecules to the Biosphere. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
, , , et al. (2004). Copepods act as a switch between alternative trophic cascades in marine pelagic food webs. Ecology Letters, 7, 321–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1992). Are trophic cascades all wet – differentiation and donor-control in speciose ecosystems. Ecology, 73, 747–754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2002). Seasonal subsidy stabilizes food web dynamics: balance in a heterogeneous landscape. Ecological Research, 17, 433–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2009). Timescale hierarchy determines the indirect effects of fluctuating subsidy inputs on in situ resources. American Naturalist, 173, 200–211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (2002). Fishes as integrators of benthic and pelagic food webs in lakes. Ecology, 83, 2152–2161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002). Nutrient cycling by animals in freshwater ecosystems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 33, 341–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , and (1980). The river continuum concept. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 37, 130–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2010). Quantitative links between Pacific salmon and stream periphyton. Ecosystems, 13, 1020–1034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2013). Temporal shifts in top-down vs bottom-up control of epiphytic algae in a seagrass ecosystem. Ecology, 94, 510–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1978). Importance of a relative shortage of food in animal ecology. Oecologia, 33, 71–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, and (2012). Simple rules describe bottom-up and top-down control in food webs with alternative energy pathways. Ecology Letters, 15, 935–946.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(2004). Periodical cicadas as resource pulses in North American forests. Science, 306, 1565–1567.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , , et al. (2010). A meta-analysis of resource pulse-consumer interactions. Ecological Monographs, 80, 125–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 43
- Cited by