Two months before the passage of the Amnesty Law, in June of 1979, commenting on the controversy surrounding the issue, the Brazilian poet Carlos Drummond de Andrade published a text in his column for the newspaper Jornal do Brasil – an excerpt of which is reproduced as the epigraph above – that would come to mark the course of the law in question from its inception until today: a lack of understanding of its real objectives and the resulting distortion of its essential function. Thus, years after its passage, the amnesty which marked the gradual end of the dictatorial regime in Brazil continues to hold many unknowns, given that, rather than being an act of compassion or repentance and followed by public recognition of the errors committed, it ended up including even those injustices raised by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights.

The fact is that, as Drummond so presciently foresaw, the acclaim for amnesty was the result of political convenience, as it was considered the best that could be achieved at the time. Nevertheless, given the crooked course which the pardon took in its creation, as will be seen below, it was not possible to achieve a model for amnesty that met the parameters of Transitional Justice and international law. As a result, those same past expectations remain unfulfilled, as the poet Drummond described in 1979:

Today, however, those hopes have been pinned on a future resignifying of that law as a task for Brazilian Supreme Court. Below we will analyze the implementation of amnesty in the case of Brazil as one of the steps towards Transitional Justice.