Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T00:58:03.702Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 3 - Institutional failure in the Ga state

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 January 2010

Kathryn Firmin-Sellers
Affiliation:
Indiana University
Get access

Summary

This chapter examines the indigenous elite's response to the commercialization of land in the Ga state. I focus specifically on the efforts of the Reindorf family to define and enforce a distributionally favorable property rights system. Briefly, I argue that the Reindorf family reinvented Ga customary law, articulating a tradition that gave them exclusive rights to a significant portion of Ga land. They sought to enforce this new custom by reinventing the institutions of the traditional state so as to gain influence over the Ga Paramount Chief. Ultimately, their efforts failed. I attribute that failure to the elite's inability to manipulate the linkages between the traditional state and the British colonial state. The Ga elites were never able to persuade the British to use the colonial state's coercive authority on their behalf. Thus, distributional conflict went unchecked; property rights remained fluid and insecure.

I develop this argument in four stages. First, I provide a brief description of the Ga state and discuss the nature of Ga customary law and Ga traditional institutions prior to colonization. I then outline the changes wrought by indirect rule. Second, I examine the elite response to the commercialization of land. What type of property rights system did they articulate, and how did they try to enforce those rights? Third, I analyze other Ga citizens' reactions to the elite's overture. I trace the efforts of one group, the Manbii Party, to enforce an alternative vision of customary land tenure and Ga tradition.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Transformation of Property Rights in the Gold Coast
An Empirical Study Applying Rational Choice Theory
, pp. 36 - 58
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×