Abbott, K.W. (2008). Enriching rational choice institutionalism for the study of international law. Illinois Law Review, 2008(1), 5–46.Google Scholar

Ad Hoc Committee for Institutional Affairs (1985). Report to the European Council. 29–30 March.Google Scholar

Adam, S. and Mena Parras, F.J. (2014). The European Stability Mechanism through the legal meanderings of the Union’s constitutionalism: Comment on Pringle. European Law Review, 38(6), 848–65.Google Scholar

Agius, C.A. and Grosselfinger, N.A. (1995). The Judiciary and Politics in Malta. In Tate, C.N. and Vallinder, T., eds., The Global Expansion of Judicial Power. New York, NY: New York University Press, pp. 381–402.Google Scholar

Akhtar, R. (2018). COP21 in Paris: Politics of Climate Change. In Akhtar, R. and Palagiano, C., eds., Climate Change and Air Pollution: The Impact on Human Health in Developed and Developing Countries. Berlin: Springer, pp. 41–6.Google Scholar

Albert, R. (2015). How unwritten constitutional norms change written constitutions. Dublin University Law Journal, 38(2), 387–418.Google Scholar

Albi, A. (2007). Selected EU judgments by CEE constitutional courts: Lessons on how (not) to amend constitutions? Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy, 3(3), 39–58.Google Scholar

Alen, A. and Peeters, P. (1998). Federal Belgium within the International Legal Order: Theory and Practice. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar

Alilonttinen, P. and Ruà, S. (2008). Will the Åland Islands Become Finland’s Greenland? Helsinki: European Policy Institutes Network.Google Scholar

Alston, P. (1990). US ratification of the Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: The need for an entirely new strategy. American Journal of International Law, 84(2), 365–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Altman, D., Donovan, T., Hill, R., Kersting, N., Morris, C., Kobori, M., White, S. and Qvortrup, M. (2014). Appendix A. In Qvortrup, M., ed., Referendums around the World: The Continued Growth of Direct Democracy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 252–99.Google Scholar

Alvarez, J.E. (2005). International Organizations as Law-Makers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Anckar, D. (2014). Constitutional referendums in the countries of the world. Journal of Politics and Law, 7(1), 12–22.Google Scholar

Anderson, C.J., Blais, A., Bowler, S., Donovan, T. and Listhaug, O. (2005). Losers’ Consent: Elections and Democratic Legitimacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Anderson, K. (2000). The Ottawa Convention Banning Landmines, the role of international non-governmental organizations and the idea of international civil society. European Journal of International Law, 11(1), 91–120.Google Scholar

Andó, B., Aquilina, K., Scerri-Diacono, J. and Zammit, D. (2012). Malta. In Palmer, V.V., ed., Mixed Jurisdictions Worldwide: The Third Legal Family, 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 528–76.Google Scholar

Armingeon, K. and Ceka, B. (2014). The loss of trust in the European Union during the great recession since 2007: The role of heuristics from the national political system. European Union Politics, 15(1), 82–107.Google Scholar

Armstrong, K.A. (2012). Stability, coordination and governance: Was a treaty such a good idea? EUtopia Law Blog, 27 November.Google Scholar

Arner, D.W. and Taylor, M.W. (2009). The global financial crisis and the Financial Stability Board: Hardening the soft law of international financial regulation. University of New South Wales Law Journal, 32(2), 488–513.Google Scholar

Arts, D. (1993). Ratification processes of the Treaty on European Union: Belgium. European Law Review, 18(3), 228–3.Google Scholar

Athanassiou, P. (2009). Withdrawal and expulsion from the EU and EMU: Some reflections. European Central Bank Reflection Papers, 10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Auel, K. (2013). De-parliamentarisation re-considered: Representation without corresponding communication’in EU affairs. Paper presented at 13th Biennial Conference of the European Union Studies Association, Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar

Bachrach, P. and Baratz, M.S. (1962). Two faces of power. American Political Science Review, 56(4), 947–52.Google Scholar

Bailer, S. and Schneider, G. (2006). Nash versus Schelling? The Importance of Constraints in Legislative Bargaining. In Thompson, T., ed., The European Union Decides. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 153–57.Google Scholar

Baker, D., Gamble, A. and Ludlam, S. (1994). The parliamentary siege of Maastricht 1993: Conservative divisions and British ratification. Parliamentary Affairs, 47(1), 37–61.Google Scholar

Banducci, S.A. and Karp, J.A. (2003). How elections change the way citizens view the political system: Campaigns, media effects and electoral outcomes in comparative perspective. British Journal of Political Science, 33(3), 443–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bang, G., Hovi, J. and Sprinz, D.F. (2012). US presidents and the failure to ratify multilateral environmental agreements. Climate Policy, 12(6), 755–63.Google Scholar

Barber, T. (2018). Why the Netherlands is rejecting referendums. Financial Times, 26 February.Google Scholar

Barrett, G. (2008). Creation’s final laws: The impact of the Treaty of Lisbon on the ‘final provisions’ of earlier treaties. Yearbook of European Law, 27(1), 3–46.Google Scholar

Barrett, G. (2009). Building a Swiss chalet in an Irish legal landscape? Referendums on European Union treaties in Ireland and the impact of Supreme Court jurisprudence. European Constitutional Law Review, 5(1), 32–70.Google Scholar

Barrett, G. (2012). The constitutional location of Europe. UCD Working Papers in Law, Criminology & Socio-Legal Studies Research Paper, 06/2012.Google Scholar

Bauer, P.C. and Fatke, M. (2014). Direct democracy and political trust: Enhancing trust, initiating distrust – or both? Swiss Political Science Review, 20(1), 49–69.Google Scholar

Beach, D. (2004). The unseen hand in treaty reform negotiations: The role and influence of the Council Secretariat. Journal of European Public Policy, 11(3), 408–39.Google Scholar

Beardsley, J. (1975). Constitutional review in France. Supreme Court Review, 20(3), 189–259.Google Scholar

Bebr, G. (1958). The relation of the European Coal and Steel Community Law to the law of the Member States: A peculiar legal symbiosis. Columbia Law Review, 58(6), 767–97.Google Scholar

Beck, U. and Grande, E. (2007). Cosmopolitan Europe. London: Polity.Google Scholar

Behrendt, C. (2013). The Process of Constitutional Amendment in Belgium. In Contiades, X., ed., Engineering Constitutional Change: A Comparative Perspective on Europe, Canada and the USA. London: Routledge, pp. 35–50.Google Scholar

Bellamy, R. and Kröger, S. (2013). Representation deficits and surpluses in EU policy-making. Journal of European Integration, 35(5), 477–97.Google Scholar

Bellamy, R. and Weale, A. (2015). Political legitimacy and European monetary union: Contracts, constitutionalism and the normative logic of two-level games. Journal of European Public Policy, 22(2), 257–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bernitz, U. (2001). Sweden and the European Union: On Sweden’s implementation and application of European law. Common Market Law Review, 38(4), 903–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Besselink, L.F. (2007). Constitutional referenda in the Netherlands: A debate in the margin. Electronic Journal of Comparative Law, 11(1).Google Scholar

Besselink, L.F.M. (2014). The Kingdom of the Netherlands. In Besselink, L.F.M., Bovend’Eert, P., Broeksteeg, H., de Lange, R. and Voermans, W., eds., Constitutional Law of the EU Member States. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer, pp. 1187–241.Google Scholar

Besselink, L.F.M., Claes, M., Imamović, Š. and Reestman, J.H. (2014). National Constitutional Avenues for Further EU Integration. European Parliament, Directorate General for Internal Policies, Policy Department C: Citizens' Rights and Constitutional Affairs, Legal Affairs Committee, Constitutional Affairs Committee, PE 493.046 EN, Brussels.Google Scholar

Beukers, T., De Witte, B. and Kilpatrick, C. (2017). Constitutional Change through Euro-Crisis Law: Taking Stock, New Perspectives and Looking Ahead. In Beukers, T., De Witte, B. and Kilpatrick, C., eds., Constitutional Change through Euro-Crisis Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beyers, J. and Bursens, P. (2006). The European rescue of the federal state: How Europeanisation shapes the Belgian state. West European Politics, 29(5), 1057–78.Google Scholar

Biering, P. and Lehrer, S. (2015). To hold a referendum or not? European Public Law, 21(1), 169–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blair, T. (2000). Speech to the Polish Stock Exchange in Warsaw 6 October 2000. London: Office of the Prime Minister.Google Scholar

Blair, T. (2001). Speech to the European Research Institute. Guardian, 23 November.Google Scholar

Blair, T. (2003). Speech in Warsaw. The Guardian, 30 May.Google Scholar

Blanck, K. (2005). Austria: Between Size and Sanctions. In Laursen, F., ed., The Treaty of Nice: Actor Preferences, Bargaining and Institutional Choice. Leiden: Martijn Nijhoff, pp. 19–40.Google Scholar

Blokker, P. (2017). Constitutional Reform in Europe and Recourse to the People. In Contiades, X. and Fotiadu, A., eds., Participatory Constitutional Change: The People as Amenders of the Constitution. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 31–51.Google Scholar

Böckenförde, M. (2006). Constitutional Referendum in Germany: Country Report. In Riedel, E.H. and Wolfrum, R., eds., Recent Trends in German and European Constitutional Law. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 107–25.Google Scholar

Bogdanor, V. (2009). The New British Constitution. London: Hart.Google Scholar

Bonella, J. (2003). Big majority favour EU constitution referendum. Times of Malta, 14 November.Google Scholar

Borger, V. (2015) The European Stability Mechanism: A Crisis Tool Operating at Two Junctures. In Haentjens, M. and Wessels, B., eds., Research Handbook on Crisis Management in the Banking Sector. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Bowler, S., Donovan, T. and Karp, J.A. (2007). Enraged or engaged? Preferences for direct citizen participation in affluent democracies. Political Research Quarterly, 60(3), 351–62.Google Scholar

Boyron, S. (2012). The Constitution of France: A Contextual Analysis. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar

Božac, I. and Carević, M. (2015). Judicial Application of International and EU Law in Croatia. In Rodin, S. and Perišin, T., eds., Judicial Application of International Law in Southeast Europe. Berlin: Springer, pp. 135–63.Google Scholar

Bradley, C.A. (2007). Unratified treaties, domestic politics, and the U.S. Constitution. Harvard International Law Journal, 48(2), 307–36.Google Scholar

Bradley, M.P. (2009). The Ambiguities of Sovereignty: The United States and the Global Human Rights Cases of the 1940s and 1950s. In Howland, D. and White, L., eds., The State of Sovereignty: Territories, Laws, Populations. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, pp. 124–48.Google Scholar

Braithwaite, J. (1998). Institutionalizing Distrust, Enculturating Trust. In Braithwaite, V. and Levi, M., eds., Trust and Governance. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation, p. 356.Google Scholar

Brand, R.A. (1994). External sovereignty and international law. Fordham International Law Journal, 18(5), 1685.Google Scholar

Bribosia, H. (1997). Report on Belgium. In Slaughter, A.-M., Stone Sweet, A. and Weiler, J.J.H., eds., The European Court and National Courts: Doctrine and Jurisprudence. Oxford: Hart, pp. 1–40.Google Scholar

Bribosia, H. (2009). Revising the European Treaties: A plea in favour of abolishing the veto. Policy Paper No. 37. Paris: Notre Europe.Google Scholar

Bříza, P. (2009). The Czech Republic: The constitutional court on the Lisbon treaty decision of 26 November 2008. European Constitutional Law Review, 5(1), 143–64.Google Scholar

Brölmann, C.M. (2011). International Organizations and Treaties: Contractual Freedom and Institutional Constraint. In Klabbers, J. and Wallendahl, A., eds., Research Handbook on International Organizations. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 285–312.Google Scholar

Brooks, R.C. (1921). Swiss treaty initiative. American Political Science Review, 15(3), 423–5.Google Scholar

Brown, S. (2012). Risk, history shape German view on Europe referendum. Reuters, 24 July. Full text available at: http://uk.reuters.com/article/eurozone-germany-referendum-idUKL6E8INGNQ20120724.Google Scholar

Budden, P. (2002). Observations on the Single European Act and ‘relaunch of Europe’: A less ‘intergovernmental’ reading of the 1985 Intergovernmental Conference. Journal of European Public Policy, 9(1), 76–97.Google Scholar

Bunse, S. and Nicolaïdis, K. (2012). Large versus Small States: Anti-Hegemony and the Politics of Shared Leadership. In Jones, E., Menon, A. and Weatherill, S., eds., The Oxford Handbook of the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 249–68.Google Scholar

Bunyan, J. and Fisher, H.H. (1961). The Bolshevik Revolution, 1917–1918: Documents and Materials. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Butković, H. (2017). The rise of direct democracy in Croatia: Balancing or challenging parliamentary representation?’ Croatian International Relations Review, 23(77), 39–80.Google Scholar

Butler, D. and Ranney, A. (1994). Referendums around the World: The Growing Use of Direct Democracy. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.Google Scholar

Butler, W.E. (1995). Russian federation: Federal law on international treaties. International Legal Materials, 34(5), 1370–92.Google Scholar

Cameron, A.C. and Miller, D.L. (2015). A practitioner’s guide to cluster-robust inference. Journal of Human Resources, 50(2), 317–72.Google Scholar

Cameron, D. (2013). EU speech at Bloomberg – 23 January 2013. London: Office of the Prime Minister.Google Scholar

Cameron, F. (2016). Why we should ban referenda on EU policies. Euractiv, 4 April.Google Scholar

Cantore, C.M. (2011). We’re one, but we’re not the same: Enhanced cooperation and the tension between unity and asymmetry in the EU. Perspectives on Federalism, 3(3), E-1–21.Google Scholar

Cardozo, R. and Corbett, R. (1986). The Crocodile Initiative. In Lodge, J., ed., European Union: The European Community in Search of a Future. Houndmills: Macmillan, pp. 15–46.Google Scholar

Cardwell, P.J. and Hervey, T. (2015). The Roles of Law in a New Intergovernmentalist European Union. In Bickerton, C.J., Hodson, D. and Puetter, U., eds., The New Intergovernmentalism: States and Supranational Actors in the Post-Maastricht Era. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 73–89.Google Scholar

Cash, B. (2011). Bill Cash MP presents bill for referendum on Eurozone fiscal union. Press release, 7 September. Full text available at: www.billcashmp.co.uk/Google Scholar

Castillo Ortiz, P.J. (2015). EU Treaties and the Judicial Politics of National Courts: A Law and Politics Approach. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Cede, F. and Hafner, G. (1999). National treaty law and practice: Federal Republic of Austria. Studies in Transnational Legal Policy, 30(1), 1–32.Google Scholar

Chaffin, J. (2011). Van Rompuy draws up fast-track ‘fiscal compact’. Financial Times, 7 December.Google Scholar

Cheneval, F. (2007). ‘Caminante, no hay camino, se hace camino al andar’: EU citizenship, direct democracy and treaty ratification. European Law Journal, 13(5), 647–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cheneval, F. and Ferrin, M. (2016). European Union and Direct Democracy: A Possible Combination? Brussels: bEUcitizen.Google Scholar

Chinkin, C. (1983). The foreign affairs powers of the US President and the Iranian hostages agreement: Dames and Moore v. Regan. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 32(3), 600–15.Google Scholar

Chirac, J. (1995). Discours de M. Jacques Chirac, Président de la République, à l’occasion de la réunion des Ambassadeurs. Palais de l’Elysée, Paris, 31 August.Google Scholar

Chirac, J. (2000). Address given by Jacques Chirac to the Bundestag entitled Our Europe. Full text available at: www.cvce.eu/en/obj/address_given_by_jacques_chirac_to_the_bundestag_entitled_our_europe_berlin_27_june_2000-en-6a747c46-88db-47ec-bc8c-55c8b161f4dc.html.Google Scholar

Chirac, J. and Schroeder, G. (2003). Contribution franco-allemande à la Convention européenne sur l’architecture institutionnelle de l’Union. Paris and Berlin, 15 January.Google Scholar

Christiansen, T. (2015). Institutionalist Dynamics behind the New Intergovernmentalism: The Continuous Process of EU Treaty Reform. In Bickerton, C.J., Hodson, D. and Puetter, U., eds., The New Intergovernmentalism: States and Supranational Actors in the Post-Maastricht Era. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 90–107.Google Scholar

Christiansen, T. and Reh, C. (2009). Constitutionalizing the European Union, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Cienski, J., Smyth, J. and Spiegel, P. (2012). Sinn Fein legal threat hangs over fiscal deal. Financial Times, 20 January.Google Scholar

Claes, M. (2005). Constitutionalizing Europe at its source: The ‘European clauses’ in the national constitutions: Evolution and typology. Yearbook of European Law, 24(1), 81–125.Google Scholar

Claes, M. (2006). The National Courts’ Mandate in the European Constitution. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar

Claes, M. (2007). The Europeanisation of national constitutions in the constitutionalisation of Europe: Some observations against the background of the constitutional experience of the EU-15. Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy, 3(3), 1–38.Google Scholar

Clark, I. (2005). Legitimacy in International Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Clogg, R. (1987). Parties and Elections in Greece: The Search for Legitimacy, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Closa, C. (2011). Moving away from Unanimity: Ratification of the Treaty on Stability, Coordination and Governance in the Economic and Monetary Union. RECON Online Working Paper, 2011/38.Google Scholar

Closa, C. (2012). Constitutional Rigidity and Procedures for Ratifying Constitutional Reforms in EU Member States. In Benz, A., and Knupling, F., eds., Changing Federal Constitutions: Lessons from International Comparison. Berlin: Verlag Barbara Budrich, pp. 281–310.Google Scholar

Closa, C. (2013a). The Politics of Ratification of EU Treaties. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Closa, C. (2013b). National higher courts and the ratification of EU treaties. West European Politics, 36(1), 97–121.Google Scholar

Closa, C. (2014). Between a rock and a hard place: the future of EU treaty revisions. SIEPS European Policy Analysis (2014:2epa).Google Scholar

Coakley, J. and Gallagher, M. (2004). Politics in the Republic of Ireland. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Collings, J. (2015). Democracy’s Guardians: A History of the German Federal Constitutional Court, 1951–2001. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Collins, S. (2012). Higgins’s remarks on treaty alarm Ministers. Irish Times, 25 February.Google Scholar

Conca, K. (2015). An Unfinished Foundation: The United Nations and Global Environmental Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Congressional Research Service (2001). Treaties and Other International Agreements: The Role of the United States Senate. Washington, DC: Library of Congress.Google Scholar

Connolly, K. (2004) Germany ponders a return to banned plebiscites. The Telegraph, 20 October.Google Scholar

Conservative Party (2010). Invitation to Join the Government of Britain: The Conservative Manifesto 2010. London: Conservative Party.Google Scholar

Consultative Assembly of the Council of Europe (1952). Resolution 14 Adopted on 30 May 1952 by the Consultative Assembly of the Council of Europe Concerning the Most Appropriate Means of Drafting the Statute of the European Political Community. Communication, Doc. 40, 15 September.Google Scholar

Contiades, X. and Fotiadou, A. (2015). The Greek Referendum: Unconstitutional and Undemocratic. Constitutional Change through Euro Crisis Law: A Multi-Level Legal Analysis of Economic and Monetary Union, European University Institute Department of Law, 7 July.Google Scholar

Contiades, X. and Fotiadou, A. (2017). Introduction: Participatory Constitutional Change. In Contiades, X. and Fotiadou, A., eds., Participatory Constitutional Change: The People as Amenders of the Constitution. London: Routledge, pp. 1–6.Google Scholar

Corbett, R. (1998). The European Parliament’s Role in Closer EU Integration, Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar

COSAC Secretariat (2014). COSAC: Historical Development. Full text available at: www.panue.eu/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/History-of-COSAC-MARCH-2013-EN-1.pdf.Google Scholar

Council of the European Union (1978). Conclusions of the Presidency of the European Council. Brussels, 5 December.Google Scholar

Council of the European Union (2002). Seville European Council Presidency Conclusions. Brussels, 21-11 June.Google Scholar

Council Presidency (2007). Pursuing the treaty reform process. Council of the European Union 10659/07.Google Scholar

Čović, A. (2012). Croatia’s EU accession referendum. Referendum Briefing No. 1, European Parties Elections and Referendums Network, 22 January.Google Scholar

Cowley, P. and Stuart, M. (2010). Where has all the trouble gone? British intra-party parliamentary divisions during the Lisbon ratification. British Politics, 5(2), 133–48.Google Scholar

Craig, P., (2012). The Stability, Coordination and Governance Treaty: Principle, politics and pragmatism. European Law Review, 37(3), 231–48.Google Scholar

Craig, P. (2013). Pringle: Legal reasoning, text, purpose and teleology. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 20(1), 3–11.Google Scholar

Craig, P. (2014). Economic governance and the euro crisis. Oxford Legal Studies, Research Paper No. 30/2014.Google Scholar

Crawford, J. (2012). Brownlie’s Principles of Public International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cremona, M. (2012). Who Can Make Treaties? The European Union. In Hollis, D.B., ed., Oxford Guide to Treaties. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 93–124.Google Scholar

Crespy, A. and Schmidt, V. (2014). The clash of titans: France, Germany and the discursive double game of EMU reform. Journal of European Public Policy, 21(8), 1085–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cross, M.K.D. (2017). The Politics of Crisis in Europe. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Crotty, R.D. (1988). A Radical’s Response. Dublin: Poolbeg Press.Google Scholar

Croxton, D. (2013). Westphalia: The Last Christian Peace. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar

Crum, B. (2007). Party stances in the referendums on the EU constitution: Causes and consequences of competition and collusion. European Union Politics, 8(1), 61–82.Google Scholar

Cumberland, E. (2014). The end of treaties? An online agora. AJIL Unbound, www.asil.org/blogs/end-treaties-online-agora.Google Scholar

Curtin, D. and Dekker, I. (2010). The European Union from Maastricht to Lisbon. Institutional and Legal Unity Out of the Shadows. In Craig, P. and De Búrca, G., eds., The Evolution of EU Law, 2nd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 155–86.Google Scholar

Daimer, S. (2006). Latvia and the Constitution: A Pragmatic ‘Yes’. In König, T. and Hug, S., eds., Policy-Making Processes and the European Constitution: A Comparative Study of Member States and Accession Countries. London: Routledge, pp. 144–51.Google Scholar

Dalton, R.J. (2005). The social transformation of trust in government. International Review of Sociology, 15(1), 133–54.Google Scholar

Danish Ministry of Foreign Affairs (1992). White Paper on Denmark and the Maastricht Treaty, SN 4364/92.Google Scholar

De Becker, A. (2011). Belgium: The state and the sub-state entities are equal, but is the state sometimes still more equal than the others? In Panara, C., ed., The Role of the Regions in EU Governance. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media, pp. 251–74.Google Scholar

de Búrca, G. (2009). If at first you don’t succeed: Vote, vote again: Analyzing the second referendum phenomenon in EU treaty change. Fordham International Law Journal, 33(5), 1472–8.Google Scholar

de Jong, S. (2016). Why the Dutch referendum on Ukraine is a joke. EU Observer, 4 April.Google Scholar

De Schoutheete, P. and Wallace, H.S. (2002). The European Council. Notre Europe Paris Research and European Issues, 19. Paris: Notre Europe.Google Scholar

de Visser, M. (2013). Constitutional Review in Europe: A Comparative Analysis. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar

de Witte, B. (1994). Rules of change in international law: How special is the European Community? Netherlands Yearbook of International Law, 25(1994), 299–333.Google Scholar

de Witte, B. (2004). The National Constitutional Dimension of European Treaty Revision. Groningen: Europa Law Publishing.Google Scholar

de Witte, B. (2009). International law as a tool for the European Union. European Constitutional Law Review, 5(2), 265–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

de Witte, B. (2011). The European Treaty Amendment for the creation of a financial stability mechanism. Swedish Institute for European Policy Studies, European Policy Analysis 6, 1–8.Google Scholar

de Witte, B. (2012). Treaty Revision after Lisbon. In Ripley, S., Biondi, A. and Eeckhout, P., eds., EU Law after Lisbon. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

de Witte, B. (2013). Using international law in the euro crisis. Centre for European Studies, University of Oslo, Working Paper, No. 4.Google Scholar

de Witte, B. and Beukers, T. (2013). Court of Justice approves the creation of the European Stability Mechanism outside the EU legal order: Pringle. Common Market Law Review, 50(3), 805.Google Scholar

Dean, A.H. (1953). The Bricker Amendment and authority over foreign affairs. Foreign Affairs, 32(1), 1–19.Google Scholar

Deese, B. (2017). Paris isn’t burning: Why the climate agreement will survive Trump. Foreign Affairs, 96(4), 83.Google Scholar

Dehousse, R. (2006). The unmaking of a constitution: Lessons from the European referenda. Constellations, 13(2), 151–64.Google Scholar

Dicey, A.V. (2013 [1889]). The Law of the Constitution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dimitrakopoulos, D.G. and Kassim, H. (2005). Inside the European Commission: preference formation and the Convention on the Future of Europe. Comparative European Politics, 3(2), 180–203.Google Scholar

Dimopoulos, A. (2015). Taming the conclusion of Inter Se Agreements between EU member states: The role of the duty of loyalty. Yearbook of European Law, 34(1), 286–318.Google Scholar

Dinmore, G. (2012). Monti challenged over fiscal compact. Financial Times, 7 May.Google Scholar

Division of International Law of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace (1920). The Proceedings of the Hague Peace Conferences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dixon, R. and Holden, R. (2011). Constitutional amendment rules: The denominator problem. University of Chicago, Public Law Working Paper, No. 346.Google Scholar

Duchhardt, H. (2004). Peace Treaties from Westphalia to the Revolutionary Era. In Lesaffer, R., ed., Peace Treaties and International Law in European History: From the Late Middle Ages to World War One. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 45–58.Google Scholar

Due, O. and Gulmann, C. (1972). Constitutional implications of the Danish accession to the European Communities. Common Market Law Review, 9(3), 256.Google Scholar

Duff, A. (1981). The report of the three wise men. Journal of Common Market Studies, 19(3), 237–54.Google Scholar

Duff, A. (2005). The Struggle for Europe’s Constitution. London: Federal Trust for Education & Research.Google Scholar

Dumbrovsky, T. (2014). Constitutional Change through Crisis Law: Czech Republic. Fiesole: European University Institute.Google Scholar

Dumont, P. and Poirier, P. (2006). Luxembourg. European Journal of Political Research, 45(7–8), 1182–97.Google Scholar

Dyck, J.J. (2009). Initiated distrust: Direct democracy and trust in government. American Politics Research, 37(4), 539–68.Google Scholar

Dyson, K. and Featherstone, K. (1999). The Road to Maastricht: Negotiating Economic and Monetary Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Economist (2012). Internet regulation: A digital cold war? The internet seems to be an even more divisive than capitalist-or-communist ideology. The Economist, Babbage Blog (14 December).Google Scholar

Edelenbos, J. and Eshuis, J. (2012). The interplay between trust and control in governance processes: A conceptual and empirical investigation. Administration & Society, 44(6), 647–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ehlermann, C.-D. and Meny, Y. (2000). Reforming the Treaties’ Amendment Procedures. Fiesole: Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies.Google Scholar

Elgot, J. (2017). Lib Dems call for second EU referendum in December 2018. The Guardian, 20 December.Google Scholar

Elias, O. (2012). Who Can Make Treaties? International Organization. In Hollis, D.B., ed., Oxford Guide to Treaties. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 73–92.Google Scholar

Elkins, Z., Ginsburg, T. and Melton, J. (2009). The Endurance of National Constitutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ellis, R.J. (2002). Democratic Delusions: The Initiative Process in America. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar

Emilianides, A. (2014). Cyprus: Everything Changes and Nothing Remains the Same. In Farran, S., Örücü, E. and Donlan, S.P., eds., A Study of Mixed Legal Systems: Endangered, Entrenched or Blended. Farnham: Ashgate, pp. 213–40.Google Scholar

Engström, V. (2010). How to tame the elusive: Lessons from the revision of the EU Flexibility Clause. International Organizations Law Review, 7(2), 343–73.Google Scholar

EPRS (2014). The road to the 1984 Spinelli Report. Full text available at: https://epthinktank.eu/2014/02/03/the-road-to-the-1984-spinelli-report/.Google Scholar

EUbusiness.com (2005). Czech referendum on EU constitution 'impossible' for now: PM Paroubek. EUbusiness.com, 26 May.Google Scholar

Euractiv (2001). France and Germany agree on a European Constitution. Euroactiv, 26 November.Google Scholar

Eurobarometer (2005). The European Constitution: Post-Referendum Survey in France. Brussels: Eurobarometer.Google Scholar

Eurobarometer (2016). Standard Eurobarometer 86 Autumn. Brussels: Eurobarometer.Google Scholar

European Commission (2001). European Governance: A White Paper, COM(2001) 428.Google Scholar

European Commission (2002). Feasibility Study: Contribution to a Preliminary Draft Constitution of the European Union. Working Document 4 December 2002.Google Scholar

European Commission (2005). Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: The Commission’s contribution to the period of reflection and beyond: Plan-D for Democracy, Dialogue and Debate, COM(2005) 494 final Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar

European Commission (2015). Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council: Report on the application of Regulation (EU) No. 211/2011 on the citizens’ initiative, COM(2015) 145 final.Google Scholar

European Commission (2017a). The Fiscal Compact: Taking Stock, C(2017) 1200 final.Google Scholar

European Commission (2017b). Reflection Paper on the Deepening of the Economic and Monetary Union. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar

European Council (1990). Special Meeting of the European Council Dublin 28 April 1990, SN 46/3/90.Google Scholar

European Council (1992a). Conclusions of the Presidency (16 October 1992), SN 343/1/92.Google Scholar

European Council (1992b). Conclusions of the Presidency (11–12 December), SN 456/92.Google Scholar

European Council (1994). Conclusions of the Corfu European Council, SN 100/94.Google Scholar

European Council (1995). Presidency Conclusions (15 and 16 December), SN 400/95.Google Scholar

European Council (2001). Laeken Declaration on the Future of the European Union, SN 300/1/01 REV 1.Google Scholar

European Council (2002). Conclusions of the Presidency, (21–22 June 2002), 13463/02.Google Scholar

European Council (2005). Declaration by the Heads of State or Government of the Member States of the European Union on the Ratification of the Treaty Establishing a Constitution for Europe, SN 117/05.Google Scholar

European Council (2007a). Presidency Conclusions: Brussels European Council – 14 December 2017, ST 16616 2007 INIT.Google Scholar

European Council (2007b). Declaration on the Occasion of the 50th Anniversary of the Signature of the Treaties of Rome. Available at: http://europa.eu/50/docs/berlin_declaration_en.pdf.Google Scholar

European Council (2007c). Brussels European Council of 21–22 June, SN 11177/1/07Google Scholar

European Council (2008). Presidency Conclusions (11 and 12 December), SN 17271/1/08 REV 1.Google Scholar

European Council (2009). Presidency Conclusions (18–19 June), SN 11225/2/09.Google Scholar

European Council (2011). Presidency Conclusions (25 January), EUCO 139/1/11.Google Scholar

European Council (2016). European Council Meeting (15 December 2016) – Conclusions, ST 34 2016.Google Scholar

European Law Blog (2012). Pringle – The Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendment Conundrum. European Law Blog, 6 December.Google Scholar

European Parliament (1987). European Parliament Resolution on the Single European Act A2–169/86.Google Scholar

European Parliament (2000). GC: Nicole Fontaine Happy with Extremely Productive Discussions on Ep Proposals, press release, 22 May.Google Scholar

European Parliament (2011). Explanation of votes – Wednesday, 23 March 2011, PV 23/03/2011 – 13.1.Google Scholar

European Parliament (2013). European Parliament resolution of 12 June 2013 on strengthening European democracy in the future EMU, 2013/2672(RSP).Google Scholar

Evans, P.B. (1993). Building an Integrative Approach to International and Domestic Politics: Reflections and Projections. In Putnam, R.D., Evans, P.B. and Jacobson, H.K., eds., Double-Edged Diplomacy: International Bargaining and Domestic Politics. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, pp. 397–430.Google Scholar

Evans, P.B., Jacobson, H.K. and Putnam, R.D. (1993). Double-Edged Diplomacy: International Bargaining and Domestic Politics. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Evans, S. (2008). Consigning its past to history? David Cameron and the conservative party. Parliamentary Affairs, 61(2), 291–314.Google Scholar

Fabbrini, F. (2013). Enhanced cooperation under scrutiny: Revisiting the law and practice of multi-speed integration in light of the first involvement of the EU judiciary. Legal Issues of Economic Integration, 40(3), 197.Google Scholar

Fabbrini, F. (2016) Economic Governance in Europe: Comparative Paradoxes and Institutional Challenges. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Farrell, D.M., Harris, C. and Suiter, J. (2017). Bringing People into the Heart of Constitutional Design: The Irish Constitutional Convention of 2012–14. In Contiades, X. and Fotiadou, A., eds., Participatory Constitutional Change: The People as Amenders of the Constitution. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 120–35.Google Scholar

Farrell, H. and Knight, J. (2003). Trust, institutions, and institutional change: Industrial districts and the social capital hypothesis. Politics & Society, 31(4), 537–66.Google Scholar

Faure, G.O. (2012). Unfinished Business: Why International Negotiations Fail. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar

Ferejohn, J. (1997). The politics of imperfection: The amendment of constitutions. Law & Social Inquiry, 22(2), 501–30.Google Scholar

Ferriter, D. (2012). Ambiguous Republic: Ireland in the 1970s. London: Profile Books.Google Scholar

Financial Times (2005). EU constitution faces oblivion, according to polls. Financial Times, 3 June.Google Scholar

Finch, G.A. (1954). The need to restrain the treaty-making power of the United States within constitutional limits. The American Journal of International Law, 48(1), 57–82.Google Scholar

Finke, D. (2009). Domestic politics and European treaty reform understanding the dynamics of governmental position-taking. European Union Politics, 10(4), 482–506.Google Scholar

Finke, D. and König, T. (2009). Why risk popular ratification failure? A comparative analysis of the choice of the ratification instrument in the 25 Member States of the EU. Constitutional Political Economy, 20(3–4), 341–65.Google Scholar

Fitzhardinge, L. (1968). Hughes, Borden, and dominion representation at the Paris Peace Conference. Canadian Historical Review, 49(2), 160–9.Google Scholar

Fitzmaurice, M. (2005). Consent to be bound: Anything new under the sun? Nordic Journal of International Law, 74(3–4), 483.Google Scholar

Flietz, F. (2017). Trump will withdraw from the Paris Agreement: Good. National Review, 31 May.Google Scholar

Follesdal, A. and Hix, S. (2006). Why there is a democratic deficit in the EU: A response to Majone and Moravcsik. Journal of Common Market Studies, 44(3), 533–62.Google Scholar

Fontanelli, F. and Martinico, G. (2008). Cooperative antagonists: The Italian Constitutional Court and the preliminary reference: Are we dealing with a turning point? Eric Stein Working Paper, No. 5/2008.Google Scholar

Foster, N. (2013). Austrian Legal System and Laws. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Franklin, M., Marsh, M. and McLaren, L. (1994). Uncorking the bottle: Popular opposition to European unification in the wake of Maastricht. Journal of Common Market Studies, 32(4), 455–72.Google Scholar

Fredriksson, P.G. and Gaston, N. (2000). Ratification of the 1992 climate change convention: What determines legislative delay? Public Choice, 104(3), 345–68.Google Scholar

Fruhstorfer, A. and Hein, M. (2016). From Post Socialist Transition to the Reform of Political Systems. In Fruhstorfer, A. and Hein, M., eds., Constitutional Politics in Central and Eastern Europe: From Post-Socialist Transition to the Reform of Political Systems. Berlin: Springer, pp. 547–75.Google Scholar

Frydrych, M. (2004). Poland ready for referendum on Constitution. EU Observer, 25 March.Google Scholar

Fursdon, E. (1980). The European Defence Community: A History. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.Google Scholar

Garry, J., Marsh, M. and Sinnott, R. (2005). ‘Second-order’ versus ‘issue-voting’ effects in EU referendums: Evidence from the Irish nice treaty referendums. European Union Politics, 6(2), 201–21.Google Scholar

General Affairs Council (1992). EC Foreign Ministers Meeting, Oslo, 4 June 1992.Google Scholar

General Affairs Council (2001). 2356th Council Meeting General Affairs, Luxembourg, 11–12 June 2001, 9398/01 (Presse 226).Google Scholar

Gerber, E.R. and Hug, S. (2001). Legislative Response to Direct Legislation. In Mendelsohn, M. and Parkin, A., eds., Referendum Democracy. Berlin: Springer, pp. 88–108.Google Scholar

Gerkrath, J. (2012). Constitutional Amendment in Luxembourg. In Contiades, X., ed., Engineering Constitutional Change. London: Routledge, pp. 229–55.Google Scholar

Gerkrath, J. (2016). Luxembourg: The Constitution of Luxembourg in the Context of EU and International Law as ‘Higher Law’. In Albi, A. and Bardutzky, S., eds., The Role of National Constitutions in European and Global Governance. The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press.Google Scholar

Gerkrath, J. (2017). The Sudden Eagerness to Consult the Luxemburgish People on Constitutional Change. In Contiades, X. and Foitadou, A., eds., Participatory Constitutional Change: The People as Amenders of the Constitution. Abingdon, Oxon, UK: Routledge, pp. 139–55.Google Scholar

Gerston, L.N. (1989). Policymaking by referendum in Palau: Grassroots democracy or political paralysis? Asian Affairs: An American Review, 16(4), 175–85.Google Scholar

Gilland, K. (2002). Ireland’s Second Referendum on the Treaty of Nice. Referendum Briefing No. 1, October 2002.Google Scholar

Ginsburg, T. (2005). Locking in democracy: Constitutions, commitment, and international law. New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, 38, 707–60.Google Scholar

Ginsburg, T. and Melton, J. (2015). Does the constitutional amendment rule matter at all? Amendment cultures and the challenges of measuring amendment difficulty. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 13(3), 686–713.Google Scholar

Ginsburg, T. and Versteeg, M. (2014). Why do countries adopt constitutional review? Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 30(3), 587–622.Google Scholar

Ginter, C. (2013). Constitutionality of the European Stability Mechanism in Estonia: Applying proportionality to sovereignty. European Constitutional Law Review, 9(2), 335–54.Google Scholar

Glencross, A. and Trechsel, A. (2011). First or second order referendums? Understanding the votes on the EU Constitutional Treaty in four EU Member States. West European Politics, 34(4), 755–72.Google Scholar

Glockner, I. and Rittberger, B. (2012). The European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC) and European Defence Community (EDS) Treaties. In Laursen, F., ed., Designing the European Union: From Paris to Lisbon. Basingstoke: Palgrave, pp. 16–47.Google Scholar

Gocaj, L. and Meunier, S. (2013). Time will tell: The EFSF, the ESM, and the euro crisis. Journal of European Integration, 35(3), 239–53.Google Scholar

Gooch, A. (1986). A surrealistic referendum: Spain and NATO. Government and Opposition, 21(3), 300–16.Google Scholar

Goodman, C.F. (2008). The Rule of Law in Japan: A Comparative Analysis. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar

Gottfried, G. (2014). Continental drift: Understanding the growth of Euroscepticism. IPPR, 8 October.Google Scholar

Gouveia, J.B. (2011). Constitutional Law in Portugal. Dordrecht: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar

Granat, K. (2014). Constitutional Change through Euro Crisis Law: Poland. Fiesole: European University Institute.Google Scholar

Granat, K. (2015). Approval of Article 136 TFEU Amendment in Poland: The perspective of the Constitutional Court on Eurozone crisis law. European Public Law, 21(1), 33–46.Google Scholar

Grant, T. (2012). Who Can Make Treaties? Other Subjects of International Law. In Hollis, D.B., ed., Oxford Guide to Treaties. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 125–49.Google Scholar

Gray, M. and Stubb, A. (2001). Keynote article: The Treaty of Nice – Negotiating a poisoned chalice? JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 39(s1), 5–23.Google Scholar

Greene, W.H. (2012). Econometric Analysis: International Edition. London: Pearson Education.Google Scholar

Grey, T.C. (1979). Constitutionalism: An Analytic Framework. In Pennnock, J.R. and Chapman, J.W., eds., Constitutionalism: Nomos XX. New York, NY: New York University Press, pp. 189–209.Google Scholar

Griffiths, R.T. (2000). Europe’s First Constitution: The European Political Community, 1952–1954. Dordrecht: Springer/Federal Trust.Google Scholar

Grosser, A. (2009). The Federal Constitutional Court's Lisbon Case: Germany's Sonderweg – An outsider's perspective. German Law Journal, 10(8), 1263.Google Scholar

Gunlicks, A. (2003). The Länder and German Federalism. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar

Gurrea Martens, A.M. (2005). Portugal: The Fight against the Big Ones. In Laursen, F., ed., The Treaty of Nice: Actor Preferences, Bargaining and Institutional Choice. Leiden: Brill, pp. 247–62.Google Scholar

Hagemann, S. (2007). The EU Reform Treaty: Easier Signed than Ratified? European Policy Centre Policy Brief, 1–9.Google Scholar

Haggenmacher, P. (1991). Some hints on the European origins of legislative participation in the treaty-making function. Chicago Kent Law Review. 67, 313–39.Google Scholar

Halberstam, D. (2009). Constitutional Heterarchy: The Centrality of Conflict in the European Union and the United States. In Dunoff, J.L. and Trachtman, J.P., eds., Ruling the World? Constitutionalism, International Law and Global Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 326–55.Google Scholar

Halberstam, M. (1997). United States ratification of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women. George Washington Journal of International Law and Economics, 31(2), 49–96.Google Scholar

Hamilton, A. (2010 [1788]). The treaty-making power of the executive: Federalist No. 75. Independent Journal, 26 March.Google Scholar

Hardin, R. (1998). Trust in Government. In Braithwaite, V. and Levi, M., eds., Trust and Governance. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation, pp. 9–27.Google Scholar

Hardman, I. (2012). Ministerial aides push Cameron on EU. The Spectator, 2 July.Google Scholar

Harhoff, F. (1983). Greenland’s withdrawal from the European Communities. Common Market Law Review, 20(1), 13.Google Scholar

Harley, J.E. (1919). The obligation to ratify treaties. American Journal of International Law, 13(3), 389–405.Google Scholar

Harrington, J. (2006). Scrutiny and approval: The role for Westminster-style parliaments in treaty-making. International & Comparative Law Quarterly, 55(1), 121–60.Google Scholar

Hathaway, O.A. (2008). Treaties' end: The past, present, and future of international lawmaking in the United States. Yale Law Journal, 117(7), 1236–372.Google Scholar

Hathaway, O.A. (2009). Presidential power over international law: Restoring the balance. The Yale Law Journal, 119(2), 140–268.Google Scholar

Hayes-Renshaw, F. and Wallace, H. (2006). The Council of Ministers, 2nd edition. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Henisz, W.J. (2017). The Political Constraint Index (POLCON) Dataset. See https://mgmt.wharton.upenn.edu/faculty/heniszpolcon/polcondataset/.Google Scholar

Henry, P.B. (2013). The global trust deficit. Project Syndicate, 1 July.Google Scholar

Hepburn, E. (2014). Forging autonomy in a unitary state: The Åland Islands in Finland. Comparative European Politics, 12(4–5), 468–87.Google Scholar

Héritier, A. and Moury, C. (2015). The European Parliament as a Driving Force of Constitutionalisation: Study Commissioned by the Policy Department for Citizen’s Rights and Constitutional Affairs at the Request of the AFCO Committee. Brussels: European Parliament.Google Scholar

Herron, E.S. and Randazzo, K.A. (2003). The relationship between independence and judicial review in post-communist courts. Journal of Politics, 65(2), 422–38.Google Scholar

Hinrichsen, N.R. (1997). The constitutional objection to European Union Membership: A challenge for the Danish Supreme Court. Boston University International Law Journal, 15(1), 571.Google Scholar

Hirschl, R. (2006). The new constitutionalism and the judicialization of pure politics worldwide. Fordham Law Review, 75(2), 721.Google Scholar

Hirschl, R. (2014). Comparative Matters: The Renaissance of Comparative Constitutional Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hix, S. (2002). Constitutional agenda-setting through discretion in rule interpretation: Why the European Parliament won at Amsterdam. British Journal of Political Science, 32(2), 259–80.Google Scholar

Hobolt, S.B. (2005). When Europe matters: The impact of political information on voting behaviour in EU referendums. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties, 15(1), 85–109.Google Scholar

Hodson, D. and Maher, I. (2002). Economic and monetary union: Balancing credibility and legitimacy in an asymmetric policy-mix. Journal of European Public Policy, 9(3), 391–407.Google Scholar

Hodson, D. and Maher, I. (2014). British brinkmanship and Gaelic games: EU treaty ratification in the UK and Ireland from a two level game perspective. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations, 16(4), 645–61.Google Scholar

Hoesly, C. (2005). Reforming direct democracy: Lessons from Oregon. California Law Review, 93(4), 1191–248.Google Scholar

Hoffman, A.M. (2002). A conceptualization of trust in international relations. European Journal of International Relations, 8(3), 375–401.Google Scholar

Hoffmann, L. (2002). The Convention on the Future of Europe: Thoughts on the convention-model. Jean Monnet Working Papers, 11(2).Google Scholar

Hoffmeister, F. (2007). Constitutional implications of EU membership: A view from the Commission. Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy, 3(3), 59–97.Google Scholar

Hofmann, H.C., Rowe, G.C. and Türk, A.H. (2011). Administrative Law and Policy of the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hollis, D.B. (2005). Why state consent still matters: Non-state actors, treaties, and the changing sources of international law. Berkeley Journal of International Law, 23, 137.Google Scholar

Hollis, D.B. (2012). The Oxford Guide to Treaties. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hollis, D.B. (2014). The end of treaties? The end of history? Opinio Juris, 29 April.Google Scholar

Hooghe, L. and Marks, G. (2009). A postfunctionalist theory of European integration: From permissive consensus to constraining dissensus. British Journal of Political Science, 39(1), 1–23.Google Scholar

House of Commons Information Office (2010). Treaties, House of Commons Factsheet Procedure Series 14.Google Scholar

House of Commons Library (1996). Towards the IGC: Approaching Turin, Research Paper 96/41.Google Scholar

House of Commons Library (2003). The draft Treaty establishing a European Constitution: Technical and Constitutional Issues in Parts I and IV, Research Paper 03/60.Google Scholar

Hübner, K., Deman, A.-S. and Balik, T. (2017). EU and trade policy-making: The contentious case of CETA. Journal of European Integration, 39(7), 843–57.Google Scholar

Hug, S. (2003). Voices of Europe: Citizens, Referendums, and European Integration. Boulder, CO: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Hug, S. (2009). Some thoughts about referendums, representative democracy, and separation of powers. Constitutional Political Economy, 20(3–4), 251.Google Scholar

Hug, S. and König, T. (2002). In view of ratification: Governmental preferences and domestic constraints at the Amsterdam Intergovernmental Conference. International Organization, 56(2), 447–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hug, S. and Schulz, T. (2007). Referendums in the EU’s constitution building process. The Review of International Organizations, 2(2), 177–218.Google Scholar

Hunter, B. (1991). Luxembourg: Grand-Duché de Luxembourg. In Hunter, B., ed., The Statesman’s Year-Book: Statistical and Historical Annual of the States of the World for the Year 1991–1992. Berlin: Springer, pp. 820–3.Google Scholar

Hyde, S.D. (2011). Catch us if you can: Election monitoring and international norm diffusion. American Journal of Political Science, 55(2), 356–69.Google Scholar

Hyland, R. (1993). Pacta sunt servanda: A meditation. Virginia Journal of International Law, 34, 405.Google Scholar

International Organization (1954). European Defence Community. International Organization, 8(4), 599–601.Google Scholar

Irish Times (2007). Dutch government rules out EU vote. Irish Times, 21 September.Google Scholar

Jaaskinen, N. (1999). The application of Community Law in Finland: 1995–1998. Common Market Law Review, 36(2), 407–41.Google Scholar

Jacobsen, J.K. (1996). Are all politics domestic? Perspectives on the integration of comparative politics and international relations theories. Comparative Politics, 29(1), 93–115.Google Scholar

Jaeger, T. (2012). Back to square one? An assessment of the latest proposals for a patent and court for the internal market and possible alternatives. IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 43(3), 286–303.Google Scholar

Janning, J. (2014). Thinking Big: What If EU Leaders Had Been Bold Enough to Create European Political Union at Maastricht? In Parkes, R. and Möller, A., eds., ‘What If the EU …?’ An Exercise in Counterfactual Thinking to Address Current Dilemmas. Berlin: Deutschen Gesellschaft für Auswärtige Politik, pp. 31–7.Google Scholar

Jarukaitis, I. (2010). Lithuania’s Membership in the European Union and Application of EU Law at National Level. In Lazowski, A., ed., The Application of EU Law in the New Member States: Brave New World. The Hague: Asser, pp. 209–42.Google Scholar

Jennings, I. (1967). The Law and the Constitution. London: University of London Press.Google Scholar

Jennings, M.K. (1998). Political Trust and the Roots of Devolution. In Braithwaite, V. and Levi, M., eds., Trust and Governance. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation, pp. 218–44.Google Scholar

Jerónimo, P. (2003). Adoption and Entry into Force of the Constitution for Europe. In Ziller, J., ed., Europeanisation of Constitutional Law in the Light of the Constitution for Europe. Paris: Editions L'Harmattan, pp. 173–204.Google Scholar

Jessup, P.C. (1948). A Modern Law of Nations: An Introduction. New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Jha, S.K. (2006). Final Act of WTO: Abuse of Treaty-Making Power. New Delhi: Centre for Study of Global Trade System and Development.Google Scholar

Jočienė, D. (2007). The European Convention on Human Rights in the Lithuanian legal system: Interaction between the European Court of Human Rights and the Lithuanian courts. Teisė.Google Scholar

Joerges, C. (2014). Law and politics in Europe’s crisis: On the history of the impact of an unfortunate configuration. Constellations, 21(2), 249–61.Google Scholar

Johnson, J.W. (2017). The art of breaking the deal: What President Trump can and can’t do about NAFTA. C.D. Howe Institute Commentary, 46.Google Scholar

Jonas, D.S. and Saunders, T.N. (2010). The object and purpose of a treaty: Three interpretive methods. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 43(3), 565–609.Google Scholar

Jones, J.M. (1946). Full Powers and Ratification: A Study in the Development of Treaty-Making Procedure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Juncker, J.-C. (2017). State of the Union Address 2017. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar

Kaelberer, M. (2003). Knowledge, power and monetary bargaining: Central bankers and the creation of monetary union in Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 10(3), 365–79.Google Scholar

Karlsson, C. (2016). Explaining constitutional change: Making sense of cross-national variation among European Union member states. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(2), 255–75.Google Scholar

Karnitschnig, M. and Eder, F. (2017). Europe’s elite put on grand show of unity in Rome. Politico Europe, 25 March.Google Scholar

Kaufmann, B. (2012). Transnational ‘Babystep’: The European Citizens’ Initiative. In Setälä, M. and Schiller, T., eds., Citizens’ Initiatives in Europe: Procedures and Consequences of Agenda-Setting by Citizens. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 228–42.Google Scholar

Kavčič, I. (2014). Ustavne omejitve in prepovedi zakonodajnega referenduma. Zbornik znanstvenih razprav, 74(2014), 59–92.Google Scholar

Kellermann, A.E. (2008). The Irish referendum on the Lisbon Treaty. Amicus Curiae, 2008(75), 33–6.Google Scholar

Keck, M.E. and Sikkink, K. (1998). Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Keohane, R.O. and Hoffmann, S. (1991). The New European Community: Decisionmaking and Institutional Change. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Kerrouche, E. (2006). The French Assemblée nationale: The case of a weak legislature? The Journal of Legislative Studies, 12(3–4), 336–65.Google Scholar

Kiiver, P. (2006). The National Parliaments in the European Union: A Critical View on EU Constitution-Building. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar

Kilbourne, S. (1996). US failure to ratify the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child: Playing politics with children’s rights. Transnational Law & Contemporary Problems, 6(2), 437–41.Google Scholar

Kim, J.A. and Chung, S.-Y. (2012). The role of the G20 in governing the climate change regime. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 12(4), 361–74.Google Scholar

Knudsen, T. and Jakobsen, U. (2003). The Danish Path to Democracy. Paper for the 2nd ECPR General Conference, Marburg, 18–21 September 2003Google Scholar

Kohn, M. (2008). Trust: Self-Interest and the Common Good. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

König, T. and Finke, D. (2007). Reforming the equilibrium? Veto players and policy change in the European constitution-building process. The Review of International Organizations, 2(2), 153–76.Google Scholar

König, T. and Hug, S. (2000). Ratifying Maastricht parliamentary votes on international treaties and theoretical solution concepts. European Union Politics, 1(1), 93–124.Google Scholar

Konig, T. and Slapin, J. (2004). Bringing parliaments back in: The sources of power in the European treaty negotiations. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 16(3), 357–94.Google Scholar

König, T. and Slapin, J.B. (2006). From unanimity to consensus: An analysis of the negotiations at the EU’s Constitutional Convention. World Politics, 58(3), 413–45.Google Scholar

Korontzis, G. (2012). Making the Treaty. In Hollis, D.B., ed., The Oxford Guide to Treaties. Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 185.Google Scholar

Kovziridze, T. (2008). Hierarchy and Interdependence in Multi-Level Structures: Foreign and European Relations of Belgian, German and Austrian Federated Entities. Brussels: ASP/VUBPRESS/UPA.Google Scholar

Krunke, H. (2005). From Maastricht to Edinburgh: The Danish solution. European Constitutional Law Review, 1(3), 339–56.Google Scholar

Krunke, H. (2014). The Danish Lisbon Judgment–Danish Supreme Court, Case 199/2012, Judgment of 20 February 2013. European Constitutional Law Review, 10(3), 542–70.Google Scholar

Krunke, H. (2017). Sovereignty, Constitutional Identity, Direct Democracy? Direct Democracy as a National Strategy for Upholding the Nation State in EU Integration. In Contiades, X. and Fotiadou, A., eds., Participatory Constitutional Change: The People as Amenders of the Constitution. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 191–208.Google Scholar

Krutz, G.S. and Peake, J.S. (2009). Treaty Politics and the Rise of Executive Agreements: International Commitments in a System of Shared Powers. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Kuijper, P.J., Mathis, J.H. and Morris-Sharma, N.Y. (2015). From Treaty-Making to Treaty-Breaking: Models for ASEAN External Trade Agreements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kumlin, S. and Haugsgjerd, A. (2017). The Welfare State and Political Trust: Bringing Performance Back In. In Zmerli, S. and van der Meer, T.W.G., eds., Handbook on Political Trust. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 285–301.Google Scholar

Kumm, M. (1999). Who is the final arbiter of constitutionality in Europe: Three conceptions of the relationship between the German Federal Constitutional Court and the European Court of Justice. Common Market Law Review, 36(2), 351.Google Scholar

Kumm, M. and Comella, V.F. (2005). The primacy clause of the constitutional treaty and the future of constitutional conflict in the European Union. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 3, 473.Google Scholar

Laffan, B. and O’Mahony, J. (2008). Ireland and the European Union. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Landemore, H. (2015). Inclusive constitution-making: The Icelandic experiment. Journal of Political Philosophy, 23(2), 166–91.Google Scholar

Lane, J.-E. (1996). Constitutions and Political Theory. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar

Larson, D.W. (1997). Trust and missed opportunities in international relations. Political Psychology, 18(3), 701–34.Google Scholar

Laursen, F. (1994). The Ratification of the Maastricht Treaty: Issues, Debates, and Future Implications. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar

Laursen, F. (2002). The Amsterdam Treaty. Odense: Odense University Press.Google Scholar

Laursen, F. (2005a). The Treaty of Nice: Actor Preferences, Bargaining and Institutional Choice. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Laursen, F. (2005b). The role of national parliamentary committees in European scrutiny: Reflections based on the Danish case. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 11(3–4), 412–27.Google Scholar

Laursen, F. (2006). Denmark: The Battle to Avoid a Referendum. In Laursen, F., ed., The Treaty of Nice: Actor Preferences, Bargaining and Institutional Choice. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, pp. 57–82.Google Scholar

Laursen, F. (2008). The Rise and Fall of the EU’s Constitutional Treaty. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar

Laursen, F. (2009). Denmark and the ratification of the Lisbon Treaty. How a referendum was avoided. Dalhousie EUCE Occasional Paper 7.Google Scholar

Laursen, F. (2012a). The EU’s Lisbon Treaty: Institutional Choices and Implementation. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar

Laursen, F. (2012b). Designing the European Union: From Paris to Lisbon. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Laursen, F. (2012c). Introduction: On the Study of EU Treaties and Treaty Reforms. In Laursen, F., ed., Designing the European Union: From Paris to Lisbon. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan UK, pp. 1–15.Google Scholar

Laursen, F. and Vanhoonacker, S. (1992). The Intergovernmental Conference on Political Union: Institutional Reforms, New Policies and International Identity of the European Community. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Lavranos, N. (2011). Member states’ bits: Lost in transition? Unpublished paper, Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales.Google Scholar

Lesaffer, R. (2000). The medieval canon law of contract and early modern treaty law. Journal of the History of International Law, 2(2), 178–98.Google Scholar

Lesaffer, R. (2004). Peace Treaties from Lodi to Westphalia. In Lesaffer, R., ed., Peace Treaties and International Law in European History: From the Late Middle Ages to World War One. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 9–44.Google Scholar

Leucht, B. (2010). Expertise and the Creation of a Constitutional Order for Core Europe: Transatlantic Policy Networks in the Schuman Plan Negotiations. In Kaiser, W., Leucht, B. and Gehler, M., eds., Transnational Networks in Regional Integration: Governing Europe 1945–83. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan UK, pp. 18–37.Google Scholar

Levenotoglu, B. and Tarar, A. (2005). Prenegotiation public commitment in domestic and international bargaining. American Political Science Review, 99(3), 419–33.Google Scholar

Levi, M. (1998). A State of Trust. In Braithwaite, V. and Levi, M., eds., Trust and Governance. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation, pp. 77–101.Google Scholar

Levi, M. and Stoker, L. (2000). Political trust and trustworthiness. Annual Review of Political Science, 3(1), 475–507.Google Scholar

Levin, R.Z. and Chen, P. (2012). Rethinking the Constitution–treaty relationship. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 10(1), 242–60.Google Scholar

Lewis, J. (2017). Coreper: National Interests and the Logic of Appropriateness. In Hodson, D. and Peterson, J., eds., The Institutions of the European Union, 4th edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 334–56.Google Scholar

Lijphart, A. (2012). Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Lobel, J. (1985). The limits of constitutional power: Conflicts between foreign policy and international law. Virginia Law Review, 71(7), 1071–180.Google Scholar

Locke, J. (2016 [1689]). Second Treatise of Government and a Letter Concerning Toleration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lodge, H.C. (1925). The Senate and the League of Nation. New York, NY: Charles Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar

Lodge, J. (1984). European Union and the first elected European Parliament: The Spinelli Initiative. Journal of Common Market Studies, 22(4), 377–402.Google Scholar

Loewenstein, K. (1955). The Bonn Constitution and the European Defense Community Treaties: A study in judicial frustration. The Yale Law Journal, 64(6), 805–39.Google Scholar

Lorenz, A. (2005). How to measure constitutional rigidity: Four concepts and two alternatives. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 17(3), 339–61.Google Scholar

Loth, W., Wallace, W. and Wessels, W. (1998). Walter Hallstein: The Forgotten European? Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Loughlin, J. and Daftary, F. (1999). Insular regions and European integration: Corsica and the Åland Islands compared. European Centre for Minority Issues Report #5.Google Scholar

Louis, J.-V. (1995). The Community Legal Order, 2nd edition. Brussels: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar

Luchaire, F. (1991). The participation of Parliament in the elaboration and application of treaties. Chicago Kent Law Review, 67, 341.Google Scholar

Luhmann, N. (1979). Trust and Power. London: John Willey & Sons.Google Scholar

Lutz, D.S. (1994). Toward a theory of constitutional amendment. American Political Science Review, 88(2), 355–70.Google Scholar

Maatsch, A. (2016). Parliaments and the Economic Governance of the European Union: Talking Shops or Deliberative Bodies? London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar

Mac Amhlaigh, C. (2009). Revolt by referendum? In search of a European constitutional narrative. European Law Journal, 15(4), 552–63.Google Scholar

Macron, E. (2017). Discours du Président de la République, Emmanuel Macron, à la Pnyx, Athens, 7 September. Full text available at: www.elysee.fr/declarations/article/discours-du-president-de-la-republique-emmanuel-macron-a-la-pnyx-athenes-le-jeudi-7-septembre-201/.Google Scholar

Magnette, P. (2016). Wallonia blocked a harmful EU trade deal – But we don’t share Trump’s dreams. The Guardian, 14 November.Google Scholar

Magnette, P. and Nicolaidis, K. (2004). The European Convention: Bargaining in the shadow of rhetoric. West European Politics, 27(3), 381–404.Google Scholar

Maher, I. (2006). Economic governance: Hybridity, accountability and control. Columbia Journal of European Law, 13(3), 679.Google Scholar

Maher, I. (2010). Trust and EU law and governance. Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies, 12, 283–311.Google Scholar

Mahne, K.P. (2012). A unitary patent and Unified Patent Court for the European Union: An analysis of Europe’s long standing attempt to create a supranational patent system. Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society, 94(2), 162–91.Google Scholar

Mair, P. (1997). Party System Change: Approaches and Interpretations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Mair, P. (2013). Ruling the Void: The Hollowing of Western Democracy. London: Verso Books.Google Scholar

Majone, G. (2009). The ‘referendum threat’, the rationally ignorant voter, and the political culture of the EU. University College Dublin Law Research Paper, 4.Google Scholar

Malley, R. and Agha, H. (2001). Camp David: The tragedy of errors. New York Review of Books, 48(13), 59–65.Google Scholar

Mance, H. (2016). Britain has had enough of experts, says Gove. Financial Times, 3 June.Google Scholar

Marek, D. and Baun, M. (2010). The Czech Republic and the European Union. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Martinico, G. and Pollicino, O. (2012). The Interaction between Europe’s Legal Systems: Judicial Dialogue and the Creation of Supranational Laws. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar

Mason, R. and Asthana, A. (2017). May to put Brexit deal to MPs’ vote before it goes to European parliament. The Guardian, 7 February.Google Scholar

Mateo González, G. (2006). Domestic Politics and Referendums on the Constitutional Treaty. Fiesole: Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies, European University Institute.Google Scholar

Maurer, A. (2002). The European Parliament: Win-Sets of a Less Invited Guest. In Laursen, F., ed., The Amsterdam Treaty: National Preference Formation, Interstate Bargaining and Outcome. Odense: University Press of Southern Denmark, pp. 405–50.Google Scholar

Maurer, A. (2003). Less bargaining, more deliberation: The convention method for enhancing EU democracy. Internationale Politik und Gesellschaft, 2003(1), 167–91.Google Scholar

Mavčič, A. (2013). Constitutional Review, 2nd edition. Lake Mary: Vandeplas Publishing.Google Scholar

McClean, P. (2017). After Brexit: The UK will need to renegotiate at least 759 treaties. Financial Times, 30 May.Google Scholar

McGowan, L. (2010). The Antitrust Revolution in Europe: Exploring the European Commission’s Cartel Policy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar

McNair, B.A.D.M. (1961). The Law of Treaties. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

McWhinney, E. (1961). Judicial restraint and the West German Constitutional Court. Harvard Law Review, 75(1), 5–38.Google Scholar

Meessen, K.M. (1993). Hedging European integration: The Maastricht Judgment of the Federal Constitutional Court of Germany. Fordham International Law Journal, 17, 511.Google Scholar

Mendez, F., Mendez, M. and Triga, V. (2014). Referendums and the European Union: A Comparative Inquiry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Mendez, M. (2017). Constitutional review of treaties: Lessons for comparative constitutional design and practice. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 15(1), 84–109.Google Scholar

Meron, T. (1995). The authority to make treaties in the late Middle Ages. American Journal of International Law, 89(1), 1–20.Google Scholar

Meyer, T. (2014). Collective decision-making in international governance. AJIL Unbound. Full text available at: www.asil.org/blogs/collective-decision-making-international-governance-agora-end-treaties.Google Scholar

Miller, V. (2003). The Convention on the Future of Europe: Proposals for a European Constitution. House of Commons Library Research Paper, 03/23.Google Scholar

Miller, V. (2009). The Lisbon Treaty: Ratification by the Czech Republic. House of Commons Library, International Affairs and Defence Section, SN05214.Google Scholar

Miller, V., Dodd, T. and Watson, F.M. (1995). Towards the IGC: Enter the Reflection Group. London: House of Commons Library.Google Scholar

Millns, S. (2008). Constitution for Europe. In Cane, P. and Conaghan, J., eds., The New Oxford Companion to Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Milner, H.V. (1997). Interests, Institutions, and Information: Domestic Politics and International Relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Milner, H.V. and Rosendorff, B.P. (1997). Democratic politics and international trade negotiations: Elections and divided government as constraints on trade liberalization. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 41(1), 117–46.Google Scholar

Mo, J. (1995). Domestic institutions and international bargaining: The role of agent veto in two-level games. American Political Science Review, 89(4), 914–24.Google Scholar

Monaghan, E. (2012). Assessing participation and democracy in the EU: The case of the European Citizens’ Initiative. Perspectives on European Politics and Society, 13(3), 285–98.Google Scholar

Moravcsik, A. (1991). Negotiating the Single European Act: National interests and conventional statecraft in the European Community. International Organization, 45(1), 19–56.Google Scholar

Moravcsik, A. (1993a). Armaments among Allies: European Weapons Collaboration, 1975–1985. In Evans, P.B., Jacobson, H.K. and Putnam, R.D., eds., Double-Edged Diplomacy: International Bargaining and Domestic Politics. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, pp. 128–67.Google Scholar

Moravcsik, A. (1993b). Preferences and power in the European Community: A liberal intergovernmentalist approach. Journal of Common Market Studies, 31(4), 473–524.Google Scholar

Moravcsik, A. (1994). Why the European Community strengthens the state: Domestic politics and international cooperation. CES Working Paper, 52.Google Scholar

Moravcsik, A. (1998). The Choice for Europe: Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Moravcsik, A. (1999). ‘Is something rotten in the state of Denmark?’ Constructivism and European integration. Journal of European Public Policy, 6(4), 669–81.Google Scholar

Moravcsik, A. (2002). Reassessing legitimacy in the European Union. Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(4), 603–24.Google Scholar

Moravcsik, A. (2006). What can we learn from the collapse of the European constitutional project? Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 47(2), 219–41.Google Scholar

Moravcsik, A. (2008). The myth of Europe’s ‘democratic deficit’. Intereconomics, 43(6), 331–40.Google Scholar

Morel, L. (1996). France: Towards a Less Controversial Use of the Referendum? In Uleri, P.V. and Gallagher, M., eds., The Referendum Experience in Europe. Basingstoke: Macmillan, pp. 66–85.Google Scholar

Morel, L. (2012). Referendums. In Rosenfeld, M. and Sajó, A., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 501–28.Google Scholar

Mueller, D.C. (1996). Constitutional Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Muñoz, J. (2017). Political Trust and Multilevel Government. In Zmerli, S. and van der Meer, T.W.G., eds., Handbook on Political Trust. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 69–88.Google Scholar

Muñoz, J., Torcal, M. and Bonet, E. (2011). Institutional trust and multilevel government in the European Union: Congruence or compensation? European Union Politics, 12(4), 551–74.Google Scholar

Negretto, G.L. (2013). Making Constitutions: Presidents, Parties, and Institutional Choice in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Neumann, I.B. (2012). At Home with the Diplomats: Inside a European Foreign Ministry. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Nielsen, J.B. (2013). Denmark. In Cook, B.A., ed., Europe since 1945: An Encyclopaedia. Abingdon: Routledge, p. 57.Google Scholar

Nijeboer, A. (2005). The Dutch referendum. European Constitutional Law Review, 1(3), 393–405.Google Scholar

Norman, P. (2003). The Accidental Constitution: The Story of the European Convention. Brussels: Eurocomment.Google Scholar

Norris, P. (1997). Representation and the democratic deficit. European Journal of Political Research, 32(2), 273–82.Google Scholar

Norris, P. (2017). The Conceptual Framework of Political Support. In Zmerli, S. and van der Meer, T.W.G., eds., Handbook on Political Trust. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 19–32.Google Scholar

Norton, P. (1996). National Parliaments and the European Union. Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Ojanen, T. (2004). EU law and the response of the Constitutional Law Committee of the Finnish Parliament. Scandinavian Studies in Law: Public Law. Full text available at: www.scandinavianlaw.se/pdf/52-12.pdf, pp. 531–64.Google Scholar

Olsen, H.P. (2013). The Danish Supreme Court’s decision on the constitutionality of Denmark’s ratification of the Lisbon Treaty. Common Market Law Review, 50(5), 1489–503.Google Scholar

O’Neill, M. (2008). The Struggle for the European Constitution: A Past and Future History. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

O’Neill, O. (2002). A Question of Trust: The BBC Reith Lectures 2002. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Open Europe (2008). A Guide to the Constitutional Treaty, 2nd edition. London: Open Europe.Google Scholar

Oppermann, K. (2013a). The politics of avoiding referendums on the Treaty of Lisbon. Journal of European Integration, 35(1), 73–89.Google Scholar

Oppermann, K. (2013b). The politics of discretionary government commitments to European integration referendums. Journal of European Public Policy, 20(5), 684–701.Google Scholar

Ortiz, P.J.C. (2015). EU Treaties and the Judicial Politics of National Courts: A Law and Politics Approach. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Osiander, A. (2001). Sovereignty, international relations, and the Westphalian myth. International Organization, 55(2), 251–87.Google Scholar

Otjes, S. (2016). Is a Nexit now on the cards? What the UK’s referendum means for the Netherlands. LSE European Politics and Policy (EUROPP) Blog, 28 June.Google Scholar

Ott, A. (2008). Multilevel Regulations Reviewed by Multilevel Jurisdictions: The ECJ, the National Courts and the ECtHR. In Føllesdal, A., Wessel, R.A. and Wouters, J., eds., Multilevel Regulation and the EU: The Interplay between Global, European, and National Normative Processes. Leiden: Brill, pp. 345–66.Google Scholar

Pahre, R. (1997). Endogenous domestic institutions in two-level games and parliamentary oversight of the European Union. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 41(1), 147–74.Google Scholar

Panezi, M. (2006). A Description of the Structure of the Hellenic Republic, the Greek Legal System, and Legal Research. Hauser Global Law School Program, New York University School of Law, April.Google Scholar

Pantazatou, P. (2014). Constitutional Change through Euro Crisis Law. Fiesole: European University Institute.Google Scholar

Paris, M.-L. (2012). Popular Sovereignty and the Use of the Referendum: Comparative Perspectives with Reference to France. In Carolan, E., ed., The Constitution of Ireland: Perspectives and Prospects. Dublin: Bloomsbury Professional, p. 279.Google Scholar

Paris, M.L. (2016). The French System of Rights-Based Review: From Exceptionalism to Parochial Constitutionalism. In Paris, M.-L. and Bell, J., eds, Rights-Based Constitutional Review: Constitutional Courts in a Changing Landscape. Camberley: Edward Elgar, pp. 302–45.Google Scholar

Paris-Dobozy, M.-L. (2008). The Implications of the ‘No’ Vote in France: Making the Most of a Wasted Opportunity. In Laursen, F., ed., The Rise and Fall of the EU’s Constitutional Treaty. Leiden: Brill, pp. 497–524.Google Scholar

Park, S. (2006). Theorizing norm diffusion within international organizations. International Politics, 43(3), 342–61.Google Scholar

Pasha-Robinson, L. (2017). Emmanuel Macron and Angela Merkel agree changing EU treaties ‘no longer a taboo’. The Independent, 15 January.Google Scholar

Paxton, J. (ed.) (1973). The Statesman's Year-Book 1973–74. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Peake, J.S., Krutz, G.S. and Hughes, T. (2012). President Obama, the senate, and the polarized politics of treaty making. Social Science Quarterly, 93(5), 1295–315.Google Scholar

Peel, M.J., Goode, M.M. and Moutinho, L.A. (1998). Estimating consumer satisfaction: OLS versus ordered probability models. International Journal of Commerce and Management, 8(2), 75–93.Google Scholar

Peers, S. (2012). The future of EU treaty amendments. Yearbook of European Law, 31(1), 17–111.Google Scholar

Pelinka, A. and Greiderer, S. (1996). Austria: The Referendum as an Instrument of Internationalisation. In Uleri, P.V. and Gallagher, M., eds., The Referendum Experience in Europe. Berlin: Springer, pp. 20–32.Google Scholar

Pergantis, V. (2017). The Paradigm of State Consent in the Law of Treaties Challenges and Perspectives. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Petersen, N. (1998). The Danish referendum on the Treaty of Amsterdam Europas? ZEI-Zentrum Fur Europaische Ingegrationsforschung, ZEI Discussion paper C-17 1998.Google Scholar

Peterson, G. (1945). II. Political inequality at the Congress of Vienna. Political Science Quarterly, 60(4), 532–54.Google Scholar

Petrovcic, U. (2015). Constitutional Change through Euro Crisis Law: Slovenia. Firenze: EUI Law Department.Google Scholar

Pettit, P. (1998). Republican Theory and Political Trust. In Braithwaite, V. and Levi, M., eds., Trust and Governance. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar

Pew Research Center (2014). Faith and Skepticism about Trade, Foreign Investment. Full text available at: www.pewglobal.org/2014/09/16/faith-and-skepticism-about-trade-foreign-investment/.Google Scholar

Pfafferott, C. (2013). People’s consultation in Austria on military service. Democracy International Blog, 16 January.Google Scholar

Pharr, S.J. and Putnam, R.D. (2000). Disaffected Democracies: What’s Troubling the Trilateral Countries? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Phelan, W. (2012). What is sui generis about the European Union? Costly international cooperation in a self-contained regime. International Studies Review, 14(3), 367–85.Google Scholar

Phinnemore, D. (2011) Treaty change after Lisbon: Is there no end in sight? Exchanging Ideas on Europe 2011, UACES 41st Annual Conference, Robinson College.Google Scholar

Pieters, J., (2018). Dutch Parliament agrees to abolish referendum. NLTIMES.NL, 23 February.Google Scholar

Pinder, J. (2010). Federal Democracy in a Federal Europe. In Burgess, M. and Gagnon, A.-G., eds., Federal Democracies. London: Routledge, pp. 178–201.Google Scholar

Piodi, F. (2007). Towards a single parliament: The influence of the ECSC Common Assembly on the Treaties of Rome. European Parliament DG dor the Presidency, Archive and Documentation Centre.Google Scholar

Piris, J.-C. (2010). The Lisbon Treaty: A Legal and Political Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Podolnjak, R. (2015). Constitutional reforms of citizen-initiated referendum: Causes of different outcomes in Slovenia and Croatia. Journal for Constitutional Theory and Philosophy of Law, 26(2015), 129–49.Google Scholar

Pollack, M.A. (1999). Delegation, agency and agenda setting in the Treaty of Amsterdam. European Integration Online Papers (EIoP), 3(6).Google Scholar

Pollack, M.A. (2001). International relations theory and European integration. Journal of Common Market Studies, 39(2), 221–44.Google Scholar

Pollack, M.A. (2006). Rational Choice and EU Politics. In Jørgensen, K.E., Pollack, M.A. and Rosamond, B., eds., The Sage Handbook of European Union Politics. London: Sage, pp. 31–56.Google Scholar

Ponsonby, A. (1928). Falsehood in War Time: Containing an Assortment of Lies Circulated throughout the Nations during the Great War. London: Garland.Google Scholar

Popelier, P. and Lemmens, K. (2015). The Constitution of Belgium: A Contextual Analysis. Basingstroke, Hampshire, UK: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar

President of European Council (2003). Report from the Presidency of the Convention to the President of the European Council, CONV 851/03.Google Scholar

Priebus, S. (2016). Hungary. In Fruhstorfer, A. and Hein, M., eds., Constitutional Politics in Central and Eastern Europe: From Post-Socialist. Berlin: Springer, pp. 101–43.Google Scholar

Prodi, R. (2000). Address Given by Romano Prodi (Strasbourg, 3 October 2000). Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar

Prodi, R. (2001). Speech by Romano Prodi, President of the European Commission Meeting with the National Parliaments, SPEECH/01/128.Google Scholar

Puetter, U. (2012). Europe's deliberative intergovernmentalism: The role of the Council and European Council in EU economic governance. Journal of European Public Policy, 19(2), 161–78.Google Scholar

Putnam, R.D. (1988). Diplomacy and domestic politics: The logic of two-level games. International Organization, 42(3), 427–60.Google Scholar

Quinlan, S. (2012). The Lisbon experience in Ireland: ‘No’ in 2008 but ‘Yes’ in 2009 – How and why? Irish Political Studies, 27(1), 139–53.Google Scholar

Qvortrup, M. (2005). A Comparative Study of Referendums: Government by the People. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar

Qvortrup, M. (2006). The three referendums on the European constitution treaty in 2005. The Political Quarterly, 77(1), 89–97.Google Scholar

Qvortrup, M. (2014). Referendums around the World: The Continued Growth of Direct Democracy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Qvortrup, M. (2016). Europe has a referendum addiction. Foreign Policy, 21 June.Google Scholar

Ranjan, P. (2009). Treaties on trade and investment and the Indian legal regime: Should we mind the gap? Australian Journal of Asian Law, 11(1), 56–8.Google Scholar

Rasch, B.E. and Congleton, R. (2006). Amendment Procedures and Constitutional Stability. In Congleton, R.D. and Swedenborg, A.B., eds., Democratic Constitutional Design and Public Policy: Analysis and Evidence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 372–401.Google Scholar

Rasnača, Z. (2013). Constitutional Change through Euro Crisis Law: Latvia. Fiesole: European University Institute.Google Scholar

Raustiala, K. (2012). The Role of NGOs in Treaty-Making. In Hollis, D.B., ed., The Oxford Guide to Treaties. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 150–75.Google Scholar

Reestman, J.-H. (2017). Legitimacy through Adjudication: The ESM Treaty and the Fiscal Compact before the National Courts. In Beukers, T., de Witte, B. and Kilpatrick, C., eds., Constitutional Change through Euro-Crisis Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 243–78.Google Scholar

Renwick, A. (2014). After the Referendum: Options for a Constitutional Convention. London: The Constitution Society.Google Scholar

Reuters (2001). No vote shows need for closer EU, Belgian PM. Irish Times, 10 June.Google Scholar

Reuters (2012). Eurosceptic Czech president says won’t sign ESM treaty. Reuters Business News, 7 December.Google Scholar

Ribicic, C. and Kaucic, I. (2014). Constitutional limits of legislative referendum: The case of Slovenia. Lex Localis, 12(4), 899–928.Google Scholar