Abbott, KW and Snidal, D, ‘Pathways to International Cooperation’ in Benvenisti, E and Hirsch, M (eds), The Impact of International Law on International Cooperation: Theoretical Perspectives (Cambridge University Press 2004) 50–84.Google Scholar

Albert, JS and others, ‘Scientists’ Warning to Humanity on the Freshwater Biodiversity Crisis’ (2021) 50 Ambio 85–94.Google Scholar

Alberton, M and Palermo, F (eds), Environmental Protection in Multi-layered Systems: Comparative Lessons from the Water Sector (Martinus Nijhoff 2012).Google Scholar

van Asselt, H, ‘Managing the Fragmentation of International Environmental Law: Forests at the Intersection of the Climate and Biodiversity Regimes’ (2012) 44 New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 1205–1278.Google Scholar

Baranyai, G, ‘The Water Convention and the European Union’ in Tanzi, A and others (eds), The UNECE Convention on the Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes: Its Contribution to International Cooperation (Brill Nijhoff 2015) 88–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barchiesi, S and others, Ramsar Policy Brief No. 4: Implementing Environmental Flows with Benefits for Society and Different Wetland Ecosystems in River Systems (Ramsar Convention Secretariat 2018).Google Scholar

Bastmeijer, K, ‘Intergenerational Equity and the Antarctic Treaty System: Continued Efforts to Prevent “Mastery”’ (2011) 3 Yearbook of Polar Law 636.Google Scholar

Bazin, F, Skinner, J and Koundouno, J (eds), Sharing the Water, Sharing the Benefits: Lessons from Six Large Dams in West Africa (International Institute for Environment and Development 2011).Google Scholar

Belinskij, A, ‘Cooperation between Finland and the Russian Federation’ in Tanzi, A and others (eds), The UNECE Convention on the Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes (Brill Nijhoff 2015) 310–316.Google Scholar

Bendel, J and Harrison, J, ‘Determining the Legal Nature and Content of EIAs in International Environmental Law: What Does the ICJ Decision in the Joined Costa Rica v Nicaragua/Nicaragua v Costa Rica Cases Tell Us?’ (2017) 42 Questions of International Law 13–21.Google Scholar

Benvenisti, E, ‘Collective Action in the Utilization of Shared Freshwater: The Challenges of International Water Resources Law’ (1996) 90 American Journal of International Law 384–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benvenisti, E and Hirsch, M (eds), The Impact of International Law on International Cooperation: Theoretical Perspectives (Cambridge University Press 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bernardini, F, ‘The Normative and Institutional Evolution of the Convention’ in Tanzi, A and others (eds), The UNECE Convention on the Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes (Brill Nijhoff 2015) 32–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berthelot, Y and Rayment, P, Looking Back and Peering Forward: A Short History of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, 1947–2007 (UNECE 2007).Google Scholar

Beyerlin, U, ‘Different Types of Norms in International Environmental Law: Policies, Principles, and Rules’ in Bodansky, D, Brunnée, J and Hey, E (eds), The Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law (Oxford University Press 2007) 425–448.Google Scholar

Beyerlin, U and Marauhn, T, International Environmental Law (Hart 2011).Google Scholar

Birnie, P, Boyle, A and Redgwell, C, International Law and the Environment (3rd edn, Oxford University Press 2009).Google Scholar

Bjorge, E, The Evolutionary Interpretation of Treaties (Oxford University Press 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blumensaat, F and others, ‘An Adaptive Framework to Differentiate Water Quality Impacts on a Multi-scale Level’ (2013) 67 Water Science Technology 424–432.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bodansky, D, ‘Legitimacy’ in Bodansky, D, Brunnée, J and Hey, E (eds), The Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law (Oxford University Press 2007).Google Scholar

Bodansky, D, ‘The Paris Climate Change Agreement: A New Hope?’ (2016) 110 American Journal of International Law 288–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boer, B and others, The Mekong: A Socio-legal Approach to River Basin Development (Routledge 2016).Google Scholar

Boisson de Chazournes, L, Fresh Water in International Law (Oxford University Press 2013).Google Scholar

Boisson de Chazournes, L and Mbengue, MM, ‘A “Footnote as a Principle”. Mutual Supportiveness in an Era of Fragmentation’ in Hestermeyer, HP and others (eds), Coexistence, Cooperation and Solidarity, vol 2 (Martinus Nijhoff 2012) 1615–1638.Google Scholar

Bošnjaković, B, Negotiations in the Context of International Water-Related Agreements (UNESCO 2003).Google Scholar

Bosselmann, K, The Principle of Sustainability: Transforming Law and Governance (Routledge 2016).Google Scholar

Boyle, A and Chinkin, C, The Making of International Law (Oxford University Press 2007).Google Scholar

Brels, S, Coates, D and Loures, F, Transboundary Water Resources Management: The Role of International Watercourse Agreements in Implementation of the CBD (Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity 2008).Google Scholar

Brown Weiss, E, ‘Intergenerational Equity’ in Wolfrum, R. (ed), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law [Online] (Oxford University Press 2015).Google Scholar

Brunnée, J and Toope, SJ, ‘Environmental Security and Freshwater Resources: A Case for International Ecosystem Law’ (1994) 5 Yearbook of International Environmental Law 41–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brunnée, J and Toope, SJ, ‘The Changing Nile Basin Regime: Does Law Matter?’ (2002) 43 Harvard International Law Journal 105–159.Google Scholar

Brunnée, J and Toope, SJ, Legitimacy and Legality in International Law: An Interactional Account (Cambridge University Press 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burchill, R, ‘Regional Approaches to International Humanitarian Law’ (2010) 41 Victoria University of Wellington Law Review 205–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chong, J, ‘Ecosystem-Based Approaches to Climate Change Adaptation: Progress and Challenges’ (2014) 14 International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 391–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Čolakhodžić, A and others, ‘The Sava River Basin: Transitioning to Peace in the Former Yugoslavia’ in Weinthal, E, Troell, J and Nakayama, M (eds), Water and Post-conflict Peacebuilding (Earthscan 2014) 271–296.Google Scholar

Connelly, R, ‘The UN Convention on EIA in a Transboundary Context: A Historical Perspective’ (1999) 19 Environmental Impact Assessment Review 37–46.Google Scholar

Craik, N, The International Law of Environmental Impact Assessment: Process, Substance and Integration (Cambridge University Press 2008).Google Scholar

Craik, N, ‘Principle 19: Environmental Impact Assessment’ in Viñuales, JE (ed), The Rio Declaration on Environment and Development: A Commentary (Oxford University Press 2015) 451–472.Google Scholar

DG Environment of the European Commission, Comparative Study of Pressures and Measures in the Major River Basin Management Plans: Task 1 – Governance (European Commission 2012).Google Scholar

Diz, D, Morgera, E and Wilson, M, Marine Benefits Project: Science Policy Analysis (forthcoming).Google Scholar

Diz, D, Morgera, E and Wilson, M, ‘The Unrealised Potential of Ecosystem Services: Some Reflections Concerning (Marine) Ecosystem Services, the Ecosystem Approach and Benefit-Sharing’ (BENELEX Project Blog, 5 April 2016). Available at: www.benelexblog.law.ed.ac.uk/2016/04/05/the-unrealised-potential-of-ecosystem-services-some-reflections-concerning-marine-ecosystem-services-the-ecosystem-approach-and-benefit-sharing/.Google Scholar

Dombrowsky, I and others, ‘International and Local Benefit Sharing in Hydropower Projects on Shared Rivers: The Ruzizi III and Rusumo Falls Cases’ (2014) 16 Water Policy 1087–1103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dunoff, JL, ‘A New Approach to Regime Interaction’ in Young, MA (ed), Regime Interaction in International Law: Facing Fragmentation (Cambridge University Press 2012) 136–174.Google Scholar

Dupuy, P-M and Viñuales, JE, International Environmental Law (Cambridge University Press 2015).Google Scholar

Ebbesson, J, ‘The Notion of Public Participation in International Environmental Law’ (1998) 8 Yearbook of International Environmental Law 51–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ebbesson, J, ‘A Modest Contribution to Environmental Democracy and Justice in Transboundary Contexts: The Combined Impact of the Espoo Convention and Aarhus Convention’ (2011) 20 Review of European Community and International Environmental Law 248–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ebbesson, J, ‘Impact of the Aarhus Convention and European Union Law’ in Pallemaerts, M (ed), The Aarhus Convention at Ten: Interactions and Tensions between Conventional International Law and EU Law (Europa Law 2011).Google Scholar

Ebbesson, J, ‘Global or European Only? International Law on Transparency in Environmental Matters for Members of the Public’ in Bianchi, A and Peters, A (eds), Transparency in International Law (Cambridge University Press 2013) 49–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ebbesson, J, ‘Principle 10: Public Participation’ in Vinuales, J (ed), The Rio Declaration on Environment and Development (Oxford University Press 2015) 289–310.Google Scholar

Ebbesson, J, Public Participation in Environmental Matters – International Human Rights Developments in Europe and Africa (Stockholm University Research Paper No. 58. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3164785 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

European Commission, Fitness Check of the Water Framework Directive and the Floods Directive (European Commission 2019).Google Scholar

Evans, CD and others, ‘Relationships between Anthropogenic Pressures and Ecosystem Functions in UK Blanket Bogs: Linking Process Understanding to Ecosystem Service Valuation’ (2014) 9 Ecosystem Services 5–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fawcett, L, ‘The History and Concept of Regionalism’ (2012) 2 ESIL Conference Paper Series 1–17.Google Scholar

Forteau, M, ‘Regional International Law’ in Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford University Press 2006).Google Scholar

Foster, CE, Science and the Precautionary Principle in International Courts and Tribunals: Expert Evidence, Burden of Proof and Finality (Cambridge University Press 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Franck, TM, ‘Legitimacy in the International System’ (1988) 824 American Journal of International Law 705–759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Giordano, MA and Wolf, AT, ‘The World’s Freshwater Agreements: Historical Developments and Future Opportunities’ in United Nations Environment Programme (ed), Atlas of International Freshwater Agreements (UNEP 2002) 1–8.Google Scholar

Grimeaud, D, ‘The EC Water Framework Directive – An Instrument for Integrating Water Policy’ (2004) 13 Review of European Community & International Environmental Law 27–39.Google Scholar

Grooten, M and Almond, R, Living Planet Report 2018: Aiming Higher (WWF 2018).Google Scholar

Hagemann, N and others, ‘The Long Road to Improving the Water Quality of the Western Bug River (Ukraine) – A Multi-scale Analysis’ (2014) 519 Journal of Hydrology 2436–2447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hagemann, N and Others, ‘The Role of Institutional and Legal Constraints on River Water Quality Monitoring in Ukraine’ (2014) 72 Environmental Earth Sciences 4745–4756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harrison, J, ‘Reflections on the Role of International Courts and Tribunals in the Settlement of Environmental Disputes and the Development of International Environmental Law’ (2013) 25 Journal of Environmental Law 501–514.Google Scholar

Harrison, J, Saving the Oceans through Law: The International Legal Framework for the Protection of the Marine Environment (Oxford University Press 2017).Google Scholar

Hendry, SM, ‘River Basin Management and the Water Framework Directive: In Need of a Little Help?’ (2008) 19 Journal of Water Law 150–156.Google Scholar

Hey, E, ‘Multi-dimensional Public Governance Arrangements for the Protection of the Transboundary Aquatic Environment in the European Union: The Changing Interplay between European and Public International Law’ (2009) 6 International Organizations Law Review 191–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hey, E, ‘Common but Differentiated Responsibilities’ in Wolfrum, R (ed), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law [Online] (Oxford University Press 2015).Google Scholar

Hofste, RW and others, Aqueduct 3.0: Updated Decision-Relevant Global Water Risk Indicators (World Resources Institute 2020).Google Scholar

Howarth, W, ‘Aspirations and Realities under the Water Framework Directive: Proceduralisation, Participation and Practicalities’ (2009) 21 Journal of Environmental Law 319–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hussein, H, Menga, F and Greco, F, ‘Monitoring Transboundary Water Cooperation in SDG 6.5.2: How a Critical Hydropolitics Approach Can Spot Inequitable Outcomes’ (2018) 10 Sustainability.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

ICPDR, ICPDR Annual Report 2007 (ICPDR Secretariat 2007).Google Scholar

ICPDR, The Danube River Basin District Management Plan: Part A – Basin-Wide Overview – Update 2015 (ICPDR 2015).Google Scholar

ILC, Report of the Study Group on Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties Arising from the Diversification and Expansion of International Law, vol 2:2 (YBIL 2006).Google Scholar

IPBES, IPBES Global Assessment on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (Inter-governmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services 2019).Google Scholar

IWAS, Strengthening Implementation of Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM) in Ukraine: Discussion Paper for Inter-ministerial Working Group ‘Integrated Water Resources Management’. Available at www.ipbes.net/global-assessment.Google Scholar

Janse, J and others, ‘Globio-Aquatic, a Global Model of Human Impact on the Biodiversity of Inland Aquatic Ecosystems’ (2015) 48 Environmental Science & Policy 99–114.Google Scholar

Jekel, H, ‘Integrated Water Resources Management as a Tool to Prevent or Mitigate Transboundary Impact’ in Tanzi, A and others (eds), The UNECE Convention on the Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes: Its Contribution to International Water Cooperation (Brill Nijhoff 2015) 228–248.Google Scholar

Jendroska, J, ‘Public Participation in Environmental Decision-Making’ in Pallemaerts, M (ed), The Aarhus Convention at Ten: Interactions and Tensions between Conventional International Law and EU Environmental Law (Europa Law 2011) 92–104.Google Scholar

Johns, FE and others, ‘Law and the Mekong River Basin: A Social-Legal Research Agenda on the Role of Hard and Soft Law in Regulating Transboundary Water Resources’ (2010) 11 Melbourne Journal of International Law 154–174.Google Scholar

Kazhdan, D, ‘Precautionary Pulp: Pulp Mills and the Evolving Dispute between International Tribunals over the Reach of the Precautionary Principle’ (2011) 38 Ecology Law Quarterly 527–552.Google Scholar

Kirk, EA, ‘The Ecosystem Approach and the Search for an Objective and Content for the Concept of Holistic Ocean Governance’ (2015) 46 Ocean Development & International Law 33–49.Google Scholar

Klabbers, J, ‘Compliance Procedures’ in Bodansky, D, Brunnée, J and Hey, E (eds), The Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law (Oxford University Press 2007) 996–1009.Google Scholar

Klabbers, J, International Law (2nd edn, Cambridge University Press 2017).Google Scholar

Köck, W and others, Comparative Law Analysis on Instruments for Sustainable Land Management (Leibniz-Zentrum für Agrarlandschaftsforschung 2015).Google Scholar

Koivurova, T and others, Environmental Impact Assessment in the Arctic: A Guide to Best Practice (Edward Elgar 2016).Google Scholar

Koivurova, T and Pölönen, I, ‘Transboundary Environmental Impact Assessment in the Case of the Baltic Sea Gas Pipeline’ (2010) 25 The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 151–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koskenniemi, M, ‘Hegemonic Regimes’ in Young, M (ed), Regime Interaction in International Law (Cambridge University Press 2012) 305–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krasner, SD, ‘Structural Causes and Regime Consequences: Regimes as Intervening Variables’ (1982) 36 International Organization 185–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kumar, P (ed), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB): Ecological and Economic Foundations (Earthscan 2010).Google Scholar

Lagendijk, V, ‘Divided Development: Post-war Ideas on River Utilisation and Their Influence on the Development of the Danube’ (2015) 37 The International History Review 80–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Langlet, D and Rayfuse, R (eds), The Ecosystem Approach in Ocean Planning and Governance: Perspectives from Europe and Beyond (Brill Nijhoff 2019 ).Google Scholar

Lee, B and others, Resources Futures (Chatham House 2012).Google Scholar

Lee, J, Preservation of Ecosystems of International Watercourses and the Integration of Relevant Rules: An Interpretative Mechanism to Address the Fragmentation of International Law (Brill Nijhoff 2014).Google Scholar

Lee, M, ‘Law and Governance of Water Protection Policy’ in Scott, J (ed), Environmental Protection: European Law and Governance (Oxford University Press 2009) 27–55.Google Scholar

Libert, B, ‘The UNECE Water Convention and the Development of Transboundary Cooperation in the Chu–Talas, Kura, Drin and Dniester River Basins’ (2014) 40 Water International 168–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Linderfalk, U, ‘Cross-Fertilization in International Law’ (2015) 84 Nordic Journal of International Law 428–455.Google Scholar

Lipponnen, A and Kauppi, L, ‘Monitoring and Assessment and the Duty of Cooperation under the Water Convention: Exchange of Information among the Riparian Parties’ in Tanzi, A and Others (eds), The UNECE Convention on the Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes: Its Contribution to International Water Cooperation (Brill Nijhoff 2015) 249–267.Google Scholar

Long, R, ‘Legal Aspects of Ecosystem-Based Marine Management in Europe’ in Chircop, A, McConnell, M and Coffen-Smou, S (eds), Ocean Yearbook (Brill Nijhoff 2012) 417–484.Google Scholar

de Lucia, V, ‘Competing Narratives and Complex Genealogies: The Ecosystem Approach in International Environmental Law’ (2015) 27 Journal of Environmental Law 91–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Magraw, DB and Hawke, LD, ‘Sustainable Development’ in Bodansky, D, Brunnée, J and Hey, E (eds), The Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law (Oxford University Press 2007) 613–638.Google Scholar

Magsig, B-O, International Water Law and the Quest for Common Security (Routledge 2015).Google Scholar

Marsden, S and Brandon, E, Transboundary Environmental Governance in Asia: Practice and Prospects with the UNECE Environmental Agreements (Edward Elgar 2015).Google Scholar

Matz-Lück, N, ‘Norm Interpretation across International Regimes: Competences and Legitimacy’ in Young, MA (ed), Regime Interaction in International Law: Facing Fragmentation (Cambridge University Press 2012) 201–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mbengue, MM and Tignino, M, ‘Transparency, Public Participation, and Amicus Curiae in Water Disputes’ in Brown Weiss, E, Boisson de Chazournes, L and Bernasconi-Osterwalder, N (eds), Fresh Water and International Economic Law (Oxford University Press 2005) 367–405.Google Scholar

McCaffrey, SC, The Law of International Watercourses (2nd edn, Oxford University Press 2007).Google Scholar

McIntyre, J, ‘The Declaratory Judgment in Recent Jurisprudence of the ICJ: Conflicting Approaches to State Responsibility?’ (2016) 29 Leiden Journal of International Law 177–195.Google Scholar

McIntyre, O, ‘The Emergence of an “Ecosystem Approach” to the Protection of International Watercourses under International Law’ (2004) 13 Review of European Community & International Environmental Law 1–14.Google Scholar

McIntyre, O, Environmental Protection of International Watercourses under International Law (Ashgate 2007).Google Scholar

McIntyre, O, ‘Utilization of Shared International Freshwater Resources – The Meaning and Role of “Equity” in International Water Law’ (2013) 38 Water International 112–129.Google Scholar

McIntyre, O, ‘The Protection of Freshwater Ecosystems Revisited: Towards a Common Understanding of the “Ecosystems Approach” to the Protection of Transboundary Water Resources’ (2014) 23 Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law 88–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McIntyre, O, ‘Benefit-Sharing and Upstream/Downstream Cooperation for Ecological Protection of Transboundary Waters: Opportunities for China as an Upstream State’ (2015) 40 Water International 48–70.Google Scholar

McIntyre, O, ‘Environmental Protection and the Ecosystem Approach’ in McCaffrey, S, Leb, C and Denoon, R (eds), Handbook of International Water Law Research (Edward Elgar 2019) 126–146.Google Scholar

McLachlan, C, ‘The Principle of Systemic Integration and Article 31 (3)(C) of the Vienna Convention’ (2005) 54 International & Comparative Law Quarterly 279–320.Google Scholar

Mekong River Commission, Integrated Water Resources Management-Based Basin Development Strategy for the Lower Mekong Basin 2016–2020 (Mekong River Commission 2016).Google Scholar

Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Wetlands and Water Synthesis (Island Press 2005).Google Scholar

Mitchell, RB, ‘Compliance Theory: Compliance, Effectiveness, and Behaviour Change in International Environmental Law’ in Bodansky, D, Brunnée, J and Hey, E (eds), The Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law (Oxford University Press 2007) 893–921.Google Scholar

Morgera, E, ‘Far Away, So Close: A Legal Analysis of the Increasing Interactions between the Convention on Biological Diversity and Climate Change Law’ (2011) 2 Climate Law 85–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morgera, E, ‘Ambition, Complexity, and Legitimacy of Pursuing Mutual Supportiveness through the EU’s External Environmental Action’ in van Vooren, B, Blockmans, S and Wouters, J (eds), The EU’s Role in Global Governance: The Legal Dimension (Oxford University Press 2013) 194–208.Google Scholar

Morgera, E, ‘Fair and Equitable Benefit-Sharing at the Cross-Roads of the Human Right to Science and International Biodiversity Law’ (2015) 4 Laws 803–831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morgera, E, ‘Justice, Equity and Benefit-Sharing under the Nagoya Protocol to the Convention on Biological Diversity’ (2015) 24 Italian Yearbook of International Law 113–141.Google Scholar

Morgera, E, ‘The Need for an International Legal Concept of Fair and Equitable Benefit Sharing’ (2016) 27 European Journal of International Law 353.Google Scholar

Morgera, E, ‘Ecosystem and Precautionary Approaches’ in Razzaque, J and Morgera, E (eds), Encyclopedia of Environmental Law: Biodiversity and Nature Protection Law (Edward Elgar 2017) 70–80.Google Scholar

Morgera, E, ‘Under the Radar: The Role of Fair and Equitable Benefit-Sharing in Protecting and Realising Human Rights Connected to Natural Resources’ (2019) 23 The International Journal of Human Rights 1098–1139.Google Scholar

Morgera, E and others, The Right to Water for Food and Agriculture (FAO 2020).Google Scholar

Moynihan, R, ‘Equity and Benefit-Sharing in International Water Law’ (2015). Available at https://benelexblog.wordpress.com/2015/08/03/equity-and-benefit-sharing-in-international-water-law-reflections-on-the-2015-world-water-congress/.Google Scholar

Moynihan, R., ‘Inland Water Biodiversity: International Law on Protection of Transboundary Freshwater Ecosystems and Biodiversity’ in Razzaque, J and Morgera, E (eds), Biodiversity and Nature Protection Law (Edward Elgar 2017) 190–201.Google Scholar

Moynihan, R and Magsig, B-O, ‘The Rising Role of Regional Approaches in International Water Law: Lessons from the UNECE Water Regime and Himalayan Asia for Strengthening Transboundary Water Cooperation’ (2014) 23 Review of European Community & International Environmental Law 43–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nałęcz, T, ‘Sustainable Use and Protection of Groundwater Resources – Transboundary Water Management – Belarus, Poland and Ukraine’ (2010) 441 Bulletin of the Polish Geological Institute 107–112.Google Scholar

Nye, JS, International Regionalism: Readings (Little, Brown 1968).Google Scholar

Odnorih, Z and others, ‘Results of Surface Water Quality Monitoring of the Western Bug River Basin in Lviv Region’ (2020) 21 Journal of Ecological Engineering 18–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pauwelyn, J, ‘The Rise and Challenges of “Informal” International Law-Making’ in Muller, S and others (eds), The Law of the Future and the Future of Law (Torkel Opsahl Academic EPublisher 2011) 125–139.Google Scholar

Pavoni, R, ‘Mutual Supportiveness as a Principle of Interpretation and Law-Making: A Watershed for the “WTO-and-Competing-Regimes” Debate?’ (2010) 21 European Journal of International Law 649–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Plakokefalos, I, ‘Prevention Obligations in International Environmental Law’ (2012) 23 Yearbook of International Environmental Law 3–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pulkowski, D, The Law and Politics of International Regime Conflict (Oxford University Press 2014).Google Scholar

Ramsar Convention Secretariat, International Cooperation: Guidelines and Other Support for International Cooperation under the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands (Ramsar Convention Secretariat 2010).Google Scholar

Ramsar Convention Secretariat, Water Allocation and Management: Guidelines for the Allocation and Management of Water for Maintaining the Ecological Functions of Wetlands (Ramsar Convention Secretariat 2010).Google Scholar

Redgwell, C, ‘Transboundary Pollution: Principles, Policy and Practice’ in Jayakumar, S and Others (eds), Transboundary Pollution: Evolving Issues of International Law and Policy (Edward Elgar 2015) 11–35.Google Scholar

Reichert, G, ‘Entry into Force of the UN Watercourses Convention – Should Europe Care?’ (2014). Available at www.internationalwaterlaw.org/blog/2014/07/21/dr-gotz-reichert-entry-into-force-of-the-un-watercourses-convention-should-europe-care/.Google Scholar

Reichert, G, ‘Transboundary Water Cooperation in Europe: A Successful Multidimensional Regime?’ (2016) 1 Brill Research Perspectives in International Water Law 1–111.Google Scholar

Reid, A and others, ‘Emerging Threats and Persistent Conservation Challenges for Freshwater Biodiversity’ (2019) 94 Biological Review 849–873.Google Scholar

Reynaers Kini, E, The Precautionary Principle, Multilateral Treaties and the Formation of Customary International Law: A Symptom of a Larger Conundrum? (Editions interuniversitaires suisses 2008).Google Scholar

Rieu-Clarke, A, ‘A Fresh Approach to International Law in the Field of Sustainable Development: What Lessons from the Law of International Watercourses?’ (University of Dundee 2004).Google Scholar

Rieu-Clarke, A, ‘An Overview of Stakeholder Participation: What Current Practice and Future Challenges? Case Study of the Danube Basin’ (2007) 18 Colorado Journal of International Environmental Law and Policy 611–632.Google Scholar

Rieu-Clarke, A, ‘Notification and Consultation on Planned Measures Concerning International Watercourses: Learning Lessons from the Pulp Mills and Kishenganga Cases’ (2014) 24 Yearbook of International Environmental Law 102–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rieu-Clarke, A, ‘Notification and Consultation Procedures under the Mekong Agreement: Insights from the Xayaburi Controversy’ (2015) 5 Asian Journal of International Law 143–175.Google Scholar

Rieu-Clarke, A, ‘The Sustainability Principle’ in Tanzi, A and Others (eds), The UNECE Convention on the Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes: Its Contribution to International Water Cooperation (Brill Nijhoff 2015) 195–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rieu-Clarke, A, ‘Can Reporting Enhance Transboundary Water Cooperation? Early Insights from the Water Convention and the Sustainable Development Goals Reporting Exercise’ (2020) 29 Review of European Community & International Environmental Law 361–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rieu-Clarke, A, ‘Does the New Reporting Mechanism under the UNECE Water Convention Offer Innovation in the Sustainable Management of Transboundary Water Resources?’ in Boeve, M and others (eds), Environmental Law for Transitions to Sustainability (Intersentia 2020 (forthcoming)).Google Scholar

Rieu-Clarke, A, Moynihan, R and Magsig, B-O, UN Watercourses Convention: User’s Guide (IHP-HELP Centre for Water Law, Policy and Science 2012).Google Scholar

Rieu-Clarke, A, Moynihan, R and Magsig, B-O, Transboundary Water Governance and Climate Change Adaptation: International Law, Policy Guidelines and Best Practice Application (UNESCO 2015).Google Scholar

Rieu-Clarke, A and Spray, C, ‘Ecosystem Services and International Water Law: Towards a More Effective Determination and Implementation of Equity?’ (2013) 16 Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal 12–65.Google Scholar

van Rijswick, M and Keesen, A, ‘The EU Approach for Integrated Water Resource Management: Transposing the EU Water Framework Directive within a National Context – Key Insights from Experience’ in Rieu-Clarke, A, Allan, A and Hendry, S (eds), Routledge Handbook of Water Law and Policy (Routledge 2017) 51–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Russi, D and others, The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity for Water and Wetlands (IEEP & Ramsar Secretariat 2013).Google Scholar

de Sadeleer, N and Khayli, MA, ‘The Role of the Precautionary Principle in the Convention on the Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and Lakes’ in Tanzi, A and others (eds), The UNECE Water Convention on the Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes: Its Contribution to International Water Cooperation (Brill Nijhoff 2015) 160–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sadoff, CW and Grey, D, ‘Cooperation on International Rivers: A Continuum for Securing and Sharing Benefits’ (2005) 30 Water International 420–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sands, P, ‘Treaty, Custom and the Cross-Fertilization of International Law’ (1998) 1 Yale Human Rights and Development Journal 85–106.Google Scholar

Sands, P and Others, Principles of International Environmental Law (4th edn, Cambridge University Press 2018).Google Scholar

Savov, N, Ilg-Hirsch, F and Kamke, C, Hazard Prevention and Crisis Management in the Danube River Delta (Umweltbundesamt 2016).Google Scholar

Schmeier, S, Governing International Watercourses: River Basin Organizations and the Sustainable Governance of Internationally Shared Rivers and Lakes (Routledge 2013).Google Scholar

Schrage, W, Bull, K and Karadjova, A, ‘Environmental Legal Instruments in the UNECE Region’, Yearbook of International Environmental Law, vol 18 (Oxford University Press 2007).Google Scholar

Scott, KN, ‘International Environmental Governance: Managing Fragmentation through Institutional Connection’ (2011) 12 Melbourne Journal of International Law 1–40.Google Scholar

Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Global Biodiversity Outlook 4 (Convention on Biological Diversity 2014).Google Scholar

Shelton, D (ed), Commitment and Compliance: The Role of Non-binding Norms in the International Legal System (Oxford University Press 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Slaughter, A-M, ‘International Law and International Relations Theory: Twenty Years Later’ in Dunoff, JL and Pollack, MA (eds), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (Cambridge University Press 2012) 613–625.Google Scholar

de Strasser, L and others, ‘A Methodology to Assess the Water Energy Food Ecosystems Nexus in Transboundary River Basins’ (2016) 8 Water 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Strayer, DL and Dudgeon, D, ‘Freshwater Biodiversity Conservation: Recent Progress and Future Challenges’ (2010) 29 Journal of the North American Benthological Society 344–358.Google Scholar

Tanzi, A, The Economic Commission for Europe Water Convention and the United Nations Watercourses Convention: An Analysis of Their Harmonized Contribution to International Water Law (UNECE 2015).Google Scholar

Tanzi, A and Arcari, M, The United Nations Convention on the Law of International Watercourses: A Framework for Sharing (Kluwer Law International 2001).Google Scholar

Tanzi, A and Kolliopoulos, A, ‘The No-Harm Rule’ in Tanzi, A and Others (eds), The UNECE Convention on the Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes (Brill Nijhoff 2015) 131–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tanzi, A and Others (eds), The UNECE Convention on the Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes: Its Contribution to International Water Cooperation (Brill Nijhoff 2015).Google Scholar

Tarlock, D, ‘Ecosystems’ in Bodansky, D, Brunnée, J and Hey, E (eds), The Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law (Oxford University Press 2007) 574–595.Google Scholar

Tickner, D and Others, ‘Bending the Curve of Global Freshwater Biodiversity Loss: An Emergency Recovery Plan’ (2020) 70 BioScience 330–342.Google Scholar

Tignino, M, ‘Joint Infrastructure and the Sharing of Benefits in the Senegal and Niger Watersheds’ (2016) 41 Water International 835–850.Google Scholar

Trouwborst, A, Evolution and Status of the Precautionary Principle in International Law (Kluwer Law International 2002).Google Scholar

Trouwborst, A, ‘The Precautionary Approach and the Ecosystem Approach in International Law: Differences, Similarities and Interlinkages’ (2009) 18 Review of European Community & International Environmental Law 26–37.Google Scholar

UN Water, Transboundary Waters: Sharing Benefits, Sharing Responsibilities (UN Water 2008).Google Scholar

UN Water, ‘UN-Water Statement to the 2nd IAEG-SDG meeting in Bangkok, 26–28 October 2015’. Available at: https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/files/open-consultation-iaeg/Open_Consultation_Compilation-Members_and_Observers-20150915.pdf.Google Scholar

UNECE, Report No. 3 Bug, Recommendations for Improvements of Monitoring and Assessments (UNECE 2003).Google Scholar

UNECE, Second Assessment of Transboundary Rivers, Lakes and Groundwaters (UN 2011).Google Scholar

UNECE, Strengthening Water Management and Transboundary Water Cooperation in Central Asia: The Role of UNECE Environmental Conventions (UNECE 2011).Google Scholar

UNECE, The Convention on the Transboundary Effects of Industrial Accidents: Twenty Years of Prevention, Preparedness and Response (UNECE 2012).Google Scholar

UNECE, Guide to Implementing the Water Convention (UNECE 2013).Google Scholar

UNECE, Progress on Transboundary Cooperation under the Water Convention: Report on Implementation of the Convention on the Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes (ECE/Mp.Wat/51) (UNECE 2018).Google Scholar

UNECE, Guide to Reporting under the Water Convention and as a Contribution to SDG Indicator 6.5.2 (UN 2020).Google Scholar

UNECE, Water Convention Programme of Work 2019–2021: Responding to Global Water Challenges in Transboundary Basins (UNECE 2020).Google Scholar

UNECE and UN Water, Reporting on Global SDG Indicator 6.5.2: Template of the Second Cycle for Reporting (UNECE, UN Water 2020).Google Scholar

UNECE and UNESCO, Progress on Transboundary Water Cooperation: Global Baseline for SDG Indicator 6.5.2 (UNESCO 2018).Google Scholar

UNECE and UNESCO, Step by Step Monitoring Methodology for SDG Indicator 6.5.2 (UNECE, UNESCO 2020).Google Scholar

UNEP, Progress on Integrated Water Resources Management. Global Baseline for SDG 6 Indicator 6.5.1: Degree of IWRM Implementation. (UNEP 2018).Google Scholar

UNEP, Step by Step Methodology for Monitoring Ecosystems (6.6.1) (UN Water 2018).Google Scholar

UNEP and UNECE, Geo-6 Assessment for the Pan-European Region (UNEP 2016).Google Scholar

UNEP and UNECE, Global Environmental Outlook (Geo 6) Assessment for the Pan-European Region (UNEP 2016).Google Scholar

UNEP-DHI, Transboundary River Basins: Status and Trends (UNEP 2016).Google Scholar

UN-FAO, Progress on Level of Water Stress – Global Baseline for SDG 6 Indicator 6.4.2 (UN-FAO 2018).Google Scholar

UN-FAO, Incorporating Environmental Flows into ‘Water Stress’ Indicator 6.4.2: Guidelines for a Minimum Standard Method for Global Reporting (UN-FAO 2019).Google Scholar

United Nations World Water Assessment Programme, The United Nations World Water Development Report 4: Managing Water under Uncertainty and Risk, vol 1 (UNESCO 2012).Google Scholar

UNOIOS, Programme Evaluation of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNOIOS 2015).Google Scholar

UN-Water, World Water Development Report: Wastewater the Untapped Resource (UNESCO 2017).Google Scholar

UN-Water, Sustainable Development Goal 6: Synthesis Report on Water and Sanitation (UN 2018).Google Scholar

UN-Water, The United Nations World Water Development Report 2020: Water and Climate Change (UNESCO 2020).Google Scholar

UN-Water, UN-Water Input on Freshwater-Biodiversity Linkages: Response to the Zero-Draft Document from the Open-Ended Working Group on the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework (UN-Water 2020).Google Scholar

UN-Water, UNECE and UNESCO, Progress on Transboundary Water Cooperation: Global Baseline for SDG Indicator 6.5.2 (UNESCO 2018).Google Scholar

Viñuales, JE, ‘The Contribution of the International Court of Justice to the Development of International Environmental Law: A Contemporary Assessment’ (2008) 32 Fordham International Law Journal 232–258.Google Scholar

Viñuales, JE, ‘The Rise and Fall of Sustainable Development’ (2013) 22 Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Voigt, C, ‘The Role of General Principles in International Law and Their Relationship to Treaty Law’ (2008) 31 Retfærd – Nordic Journal of Law and Justice 3–25.Google Scholar

Voigt, C, Sustainable Development as a Principle of International Law: Resolving Conflicts between Climate Measures and WTO Law (Martinus Nijhoff 2009).Google Scholar

Wettestad, J, ‘Monitoring and Verification’ in Bodansky, D, Brunnée, J and Hey, E (eds), The Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law (Oxford University Press 2007) 974–994.Google Scholar

WHO, Progress on Household Drinking Water, Sanitation and Hygiene 2000–2017: Special Focus on Inequalities (UNICEF and WHO 2019).Google Scholar

WHO and UNICEF, Progress on Drinking Water, Sanitation and Hygiene Update and SDG Baselines (WHO and UNICEF 2017).Google Scholar

Wiener, JB, ‘Precaution’ in Bodansky, D, Brunnée, J and Hey, E (eds), The Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law (Oxford University Press 2007) 597–612.Google Scholar

World Commission on Environment and Development, Our Common Future (Oxford University Press 1987).Google Scholar

World Economics Forum, The Global Risks Report 2020 (World Economics Forum 2020).Google Scholar

Wouters, P and Moynihan, R, ‘Benefit Sharing in the UN Watercourses Convention and under International Water Law’ in Loures, FR and Rieu-Clarke, A (eds), The UN Watercourses Convention in Force: Strengthening International Law for Transboundary Water Management (Earthscan 2013) 321–335.Google Scholar

Young, MA, ‘Introduction: The Productive Friction between Regimes’ in Young, MA (ed), Regime Interaction in International Law: Facing Fragmentation (Cambridge University Press 2012) 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Young, MA, ‘Regime Interaction in Creating, Implementing and Enforcing International Law’ in Young, MA (ed), Regime Interaction in International Law: Facing Fragmentation (Cambridge University Press 2012) 85–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zeilinger, A, Danube River (Oxford University Press 2009).Google Scholar

Ziganshina, D, ‘International Water Law in Central Asia: The Nature of Substantive Norms and What Flows from It’ (2012) 2 Asian Journal of International Law 169–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ziganshina, D, Promoting Transboundary Water Security in the Aral Sea Basin through International Law (Brill Nijhoff 2014).Google Scholar