Abbott, Kenneth and Snidal, Duncan, ‘International Action on Bribery and Corruption: Why the Dog Didn't Bark in the WTO’ in Kennedy, Daniel and Southwick, James (eds.) The Political Economy of International Trade Law: Essays in Honour of Robert E Hudec (Cambridge University Press, 2002) 177CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allain, Marc, Trading Away Our Oceans (Greenpeace, 2007)Google Scholar

Allott, Philip, Eunomia: New Order for a New World (Oxford University Press, 1990)Google Scholar

Allott, Philip, The Health of Nations: Society and Law Beyond the State (Cambridge University Press, 2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alvarez, José, International Organizations as Law-Makers (Oxford University Press, 2005)Google Scholar

Appleton, Arthur, Environmental Labelling Programmes: International Trade Law Implications (Kluwer Law International, 1997)Google Scholar

Barnes, Richard, ‘The LOSC: An Effective Framework for Domestic Fisheries Conservation?’ in Freestone, David, Barnes, Richard and Ong, David (eds.) The Law of the Sea: Progress and Prospects (Oxford University Press, 2006) 233CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barnes, Richard, Property Rights and Natural Resources (Hart Publishing, 2009)Google Scholar

Bernstein, Steven, The Compromise of Liberal Environmentalism (Columbia University Press, 2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bhagwati, Jagdish, In Defense of Globalization (Oxford University Press, 2004)Google Scholar

Bhagwati, Jagdish, Termites in the Trading System: How Preferential Agreements Undermine Free Trade (Oxford University Press, 2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Birnie, Patricia and Boyle, Alan, International Law and the Environment (2nd edn, Oxford University Press, 2002)Google Scholar

Boyle, Alan and Chinkin, Christine, The Making of International Law (Oxford University Press, 2007)Google Scholar

Brooks, Richard, Jones, Ross and Virginia, Ross, Law and Ecology: The Rise of the Ecosystem Regime (Ashgate Publishing, 2002)Google Scholar

Brownlie, Ian, Principles of Public International Law (Oxford University Press, 6th edn, 2003)Google Scholar

Burke, William, The New International Law of Fisheries: UNCLOS 1982 and Beyond (Clarendon Press, 1994)Google Scholar

Burns, William C G, ‘Potential Causes of Action for Climate Change Impacts under the United Nations Fish Stocks Agreement’ in Burns, William C G and Osofsky, Hari M (eds.) Adjudicating Climate Change: State, National and International Approaches (Cambridge University Press, 2009) 314CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chayes, Abram and Chayes, Antonia Handler, The New Sovereignty: Compliance with International Regulatory Agreements (Harvard University Press, 1995)Google Scholar

Chayes, Antonia Handler, Chayes, Abram and Mitchell, Ronald B, ‘Active Compliance Management in Environmental Treaties’ in Lang, Winfried (ed.) Sustainable Development and International Law (Kluwer Academic Publishers Group, 1995) 75.Google Scholar

Chesterman, Simon, Just War or Just Peace? Humanitarian Intervention and International Law (Oxford University Press, 2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chinkin, Christine and Mackenzie, Ruth, ‘Intergovernmental Organizations as “Friends of the Court”’ in Chazournes, Laurence Boisson de, Romano, Cesare and Mackenzie, Ruth (eds.) International Organizations and International Dispute Settlement: Trends and Prospects (Transnational Publishers, 2002) 135Google Scholar

Churchill, Robin and Lowe, Vaughan, The Law of the Sea (3rd edn, Manchester University Press, 1999)Google Scholar

Cohen, Joshua and Sabel, Charles, ‘Sovereignty and Solidarity: EU and US’ in Zeitlin, Jonathan and Trubek, David (eds.) Governing Work and Welfare in a New Economy: European and American Experiments (Oxford University Press, 2003) 345Google Scholar

Cordonier Segger, Marie-Claire and Weeramantry, C G (eds.) Sustainable Justice: Reconciling Economic, Social and Environmental Law (Martinus Nijhoff: Brill Academic, 2005)

Courville, Sasha ‘Understanding NGO-based Social and Environmental Regulatory Systems: Why We Need New Models of Accountability’ in Dowdle, Michael W (ed.) Public Accountability: Designs, Dilemmas and Experiences (Cambridge University Press, 2006) 271Google Scholar

Crawford, James, The Creation of States in International Law (2nd edn, Oxford University Press, 2006)Google Scholar

Búrca, Gráinne and Scott, Joanne, ‘Introduction: New Governance, Law and Constitutionalism’ in Búrca, Gráinne and Scott, Joanne (eds.) Law and New Governance in the EU and the US (Hart Publishing, 2006) 1Google Scholar

Deere, Carolyn, Net Gains: Linking Fisheries Management, International Trade and Sustainable Development (International Union for Conservation of Nature, 2000)Google Scholar

Delbrück, Jost, ‘“Laws in the Public Interest” – Some Observations on the Foundations and Identification of Erga Owner Norms in International Law’ in Götz, Volkmar, Selwer, Peter and Wolfrum, Rüdiger (eds.) Liber Amicorum Günther Jaenicke: Zum 85. Geburtstag (Springer, 1998)Google Scholar

Dollar, David, ‘Fostering Equity through International Institutions’ in Porter, Roger B, Sauve, Pierre, Subramanian, Arvind, Zampetti, Americo Beviglia (eds.) Efficiency, Equity, and Legitimacy: The Multilateral Trading System at the Millennium (Brookings Institution Press, 2001) 212Google Scholar

Dommen, Caroline, ‘Fish for Thought: Fisheries, International Trade and Sustainable Development’ (1999) Natural Resources, International Trade and Sustainable Development Series, No. 1 (ICTSD and IUCN).

Dryzek, John, ‘Political and Ecological Communication’ in Dryzek, John and Schlosberg, David (eds.) Debating the Earth (Oxford University Press, 1998; reprinted 1999) 584Google Scholar

Eckersley, Robyn, Environmentalism and Political Theory: Toward an Ecocentric Approach (State University of New York Press, 1992)Google Scholar

Hey, Ellen, Teaching International Law: State-Consent as Consent to a Process of Normative Development and Ensuing Problems (Kluwer Law International, 2003)Google Scholar

Eritja, Mar Campins (ed.) Sustainability Labelling and Certification (Marcial Pons, 2004)

Esty, Daniel, Greening the GATT: Trade, Environment, and the Future (Institute for International Economics, 1994)Google Scholar

Farber, Daniel, Eco-Pragmatism: Making Sensible Environmental Decisions in an Uncertain World (University of Chicago Press, 1999)Google Scholar

Footer, Mary, An Institutional and Normative Analysis of the World Trade Organization (Martinus Nijhoff, 2006)Google Scholar

Franck, Thomas, The Power of Legitimacy Among Nations (Oxford University Press, 1990)Google Scholar

Franckx, Erik, ‘The Protection of Biodiversity and Fisheries Management: Issues Raised by the Relationship Between CITES and LOSC’ in Freestone, David, Barnes, Richard and Ong, David (eds.) The Law of the Sea: Progress and Prospects (Oxford University Press, 2006), 210CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gillespie, Alexander, Whaling Diplomacy (Edward Elgar Publishing, 2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grynberg, Roman and Rochester, Natallie, ‘Expert Opinion: Fixing Cotonou's Rules of Origin Regime’ in Najam, Adil, Halle, Mark and Meléndez-Ortiz, Ricardo (eds.) Trade and Environment: A Resource Book (IISD, ICTSD and the Regional and International Networking Group, 2007) 107Google Scholar

Guilfoyle, Douglas, Shipping Interdiction and the Law of the Sea (Cambridge University Press, 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hart, H. L. A., The Concept of Law (Oxford University Press, 1961)Google Scholar

Henriksen, Tore, Hønneland, Geir and Sydnes, Are, Law and Politics in Ocean Governance: The UN Fish Stocks Agreement and Regional Fisheries Management Regimes (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2006)Google Scholar

Herr, Richard, ‘The International Regulation of Patagonian Toothfish’ in Stokke, Olav Schram (ed.) Governing High Seas Fisheries: The Interplay of Global and Regional Regimes (Oxford University Press, 2001) 303Google Scholar

Higgins, Rosalyn, Problems and Process: International Law and How We Use It (Clarendon Press, 1994)Google Scholar

Hindley, Brian, ‘What Subjects are Suitable for WTO Agreement?’ in Kennedy, Daniel and Southwick, James (eds.) The Political Economy of International Trade Law: Essays in Honour of Robert E. Hudec (Cambridge University Press, 2002) 157CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hønneland, Geir, ‘Recent Global Agreements on High Seas Fisheries: Potential Effects on Fishermen Compliance’ in Stokke, Olav Schram (ed.) Governing High Seas Fisheries: The Interplay of Global and Regional Regimes (Oxford University Press, 2001) 121CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Horn, Henrik and Weiler, Joseph, ‘European Communities – Trade Description of Sardines: Textualism and its Discontent’ in Horn, Henrik and Mavroidis, Petros (eds.) The WTO Case Law of 2002 (2003) 248

Howse, Robert, ‘A New Device for Creating International Normativity: The WTO Technical Barriers to Trade Agreement and “International Standards”’ in Joerges, Christian and Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich (eds.) Constitutionalism, Multilevel Trade Governance and Social Regulation (Hart Publishing, 2006) 383Google Scholar

Jackson, John, Sovereignty, the WTO, and Changing Fundamentals of International Law (Cambridge University Press, 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jackson, John, Davey, William and Sykes, Alan, Legal Problems of International Economic Relations (4th edn, West Group, 2002)Google Scholar

Jennings, Simon, Kaiser, Michel and Reynolds, John, Marine Fisheries Ecology (Blackwell Publishing, 2001; 2006 edn)Google Scholar

Johnston, Douglas, The International Law of Fisheries: A Framework for Policy-Oriented Inquiries (New Haven Press; Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1985) (first published Yale University Press, 1965)Google Scholar

Karkkainen, Bradley, ‘Information-forcing Regulation and Environmental Governance’ in Búrca, Gráinne and Scott, Joanne (eds.) Law and New Governance in the EU and the US (Hart Publishing, 2006) 293Google Scholar

Kaye, Stuart, International Fisheries Management (Kluwer Law International, 2001)Google Scholar

Keck, Margaret E and Sikkink, Kathryn, Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics (Cornell University Press, 1998)Google Scholar

Keohane, Robert, ‘Global Governance and Democratic Accountability’ in Held, David and Koenig-Archibugi, Mathias (eds.) Taming Globalization (Polity Press, 2003) 130Google Scholar

Keohane, Robert and Nye, Joseph, ‘The Club Model of Multilateral Cooperation and Problems of Democratic Legitimacy’ in Porter, Roger, Sauve, Pierre, Subramanian, Arvind and Zampetti, Americo Beviglia (eds.) Efficiency, Equity, and Legitimacy: The Multilateral Trading System at the Millennium (Brookings Institution Press, 2001) 264Google Scholar

Keohane, Robert, Haas, Peter and Levy, Marc, ‘The Effectiveness of International Environmental Institutions’ in Haas, Peter, Keohane, Robert and Levy, Marc (eds.) Institutions for the Earth: Sources of Effective International Environmental Protection (MIT Press, 1993) 3Google Scholar

Klein, Natalie, Dispute Settlement in the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (Cambridge University Press, 2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti, From Apology to Utopia: The Structure of International Legal Argument (Cambridge University Press reissue, 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti, The Gentle Civilizer of Nations: The Rise and Fall of International Law, 1870–1960 (Cambridge University Press, 2002)Google Scholar

Krasner, Stephen, ‘Structural Causes and Regime Consequences: Regimes as Intervening Variables’ in Krasner, Stephen (ed.) International Regimes (Cornell University Press, 1983) 2Google Scholar

Kuijper, Pieter Jan, ‘Some Institutional Issues Presently Before the WTO’ in Kennedy, Daniel and Southwick, James (eds.) The Political Economy of International Trade Law: Essays in Honour of Robert E Hudec (Cambridge University Press, 2002) 81CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fayette, Louise, ‘The Role of the United Nations in International Oceans Governance’ in Freestone, David, Barnes, Richard and Ong, David (eds.) The Law of the Sea: Progress and Prospects (Oxford University Press, 2006) 63CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Langille, Brian, ‘General Reflections on the Relationship of Trade and Labor (Or: Fair Trade Is Free Trade's Destiny)’ in Bhagwati, Jagdish and Hudec, Robert E, Fair Trade and Harmonization: Prerequisites for Free Trade? (Volume 2: Legal Analysis) (MIT Press, 1996) 231Google Scholar

Latour, Bruno, Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory (Oxford University Press, 2005)Google Scholar

Lauterpacht, Hersh, The Development of International Law by the International Court (Stevens, 1958)Google Scholar

Lauterpacht, Hersch, The Function of Law in the International Community (The Clarendon Press, 1933)Google Scholar

Levering, Ralph B and Levering, Miriam L, Citizen Action for Global Change: The Neptune Group and the Law of the Sea (Syracuse University Press, 1999)Google Scholar

Lindblom, Anna-KarinNon-Governmental Organisations in International Law (Cambridge University Press, 2005)Google Scholar

Marks, Susan, The Riddle of All Constitutions: International Law, Democracy, and the Critique of Ideology (Oxford University Press, 2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Matsushita, Mitsuo, Schoenbaum, Thomas and Mavroidis, Petros, The World Trade Organization: Law, Practice, and Policy (Oxford University Press, 2nd edn, 2006)Google Scholar

Mavroidis, Petros, ‘Amicus curiae Briefs Before the WTO: Much Ado About Nothing’ in Bogdandy, Armin, Mavroidis, Petros and Meny, Yves (eds.) European Integration and International Co-ordination, Studies in Transnational Economic Law in Honour of Claus-Dieter Ehlermann (Kluwer, 2002) 317Google Scholar

Mavroidis, Petros, The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade: a Commentary (Oxford University Press, 2005)Google Scholar

McDorman, Ted, ‘Fisheries Conservation and Management and International Trade Law’ in Hey, Ellen (ed.) Developments in International Fisheries Law (Kluwer Law International, 1999) 501Google Scholar

Morgenthau, Hans, Politics Among Nations (2nd edn, Knopp, 1954)Google Scholar

Motaal, Doaa Abdel, ‘The Trade and Environment Policy Formulation Process’ in Najam, Adil, Halle, Mark and Meléndez-Ortiz, Ricardo (eds.) Trade and Environment: A Resource Book (IISD, ICTSD and the Regional and International Networking Group, 2007) 17Google Scholar

Nanz, Patrizia, ‘Democratic Legitimacy and Constitutionalisation of Transnational Trade Governance: A View from Political Theory’ in Joerges, Christian and Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich (eds.) Constitutionalism, Multilevel Trade Governance and Social Regulation (Hart Publishing, 2006) 60Google Scholar

Nussbaum, Martha, Sex and Social Justice (Oxford University Press, 1999)Google Scholar

Nussbaum, Martha, Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach (Cambridge University Press, 2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oberthür, Sebastian and Gehring, Thomas (eds.), Institutional Interaction in Global Environmental Governance: Synergy and Conflict Among International and EU Policies (MIT Press, 2006)

Ostrom, Elinor, Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action (Cambridge University Press, 1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ostry, Sylvia, ‘World Trade Organization: Institutional Design for Better Governance’ in Porter, Roger B, Sauve, Pierre, Subramanian, Arvind and Zampetti, Americo Beviglia (eds.) Efficiency, Equity, and Legitimacy: The Multilateral Trading System at the Millennium (Brookings Institution Press, 2001) 361Google Scholar

Pauwelyn, Joost, Conflict of Norms in Public International Law: How WTO Law Relates to Other Rules of International Law (Cambridge University Press, 2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Perez, Oren, Ecological Sensitivity and Global Legal Pluralism: Rethinking the Trade and Environment Conflict (Hart Publishing, 2004)Google Scholar

Peterson, M J, ‘International Fisheries Management’ in Haas, Peter, Keohane, Robert and Levy, Marc (eds.) Institutions for the Earth: Sources of Effective International Environmental Protection (MIT Press, 1993) 249Google Scholar

Qureshi, Asif, Interpreting WTO Agreements: Problems and Perspectives (Cambridge University Press, 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rayfuse, Rosemary, ‘The Interrelationship between the Global Instruments of International Fisheries Law’ in Hey, Ellen (ed.) Developments in International Fisheries Law (Kluwer Law International, 1999) 107Google Scholar

Sand, Inger-Johanne, ‘Polycontextuality as an Alternative to Constitutionalism’ in Joerges, Christian, Sand, Inger-Johanne and Teubner, Gunther (eds.) Transnational Governance and Constitutionalism (Hart Publishing, 2004) 41Google Scholar

Sands, Philippe, Principles of International Environmental Law (2nd edition, Cambridge University Press, 2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sarooshi, Dan, International Organizations and their Exercise of Sovereign Powers (Oxford University Press, 2005)Google Scholar

Schermers, Henry and Blokker, Niels, International Institutional Law (4th edn, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2003)Google Scholar

Scott, Joanne, The WTO Agreement on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures: A Commentary (Oxford University Press, 2007)Google Scholar

Selznick, Philip, ‘Self-Regulation and the Theory of Institutions’ in Teubner, Gunther, Farmer, Lindsay and Murphy, Declan (eds.) Environmental Law and Ecological Responsibility: The Concept and Practice of Ecological Self-Organization (John Wiley & Sons, 1994) 395Google Scholar

Sen, Amartya, Commodities and Capabilities (Oxford University Press, 1985)Google Scholar

Sen, Amartya, Development as Freedom (Oxford University Press, 1999)Google Scholar

Shaffer, Gregory, Defending Interests: Public – Private Partnerships in WTO Litigation (Brookings Institution Press, 2003)Google Scholar

Shaw, Malcolm, International Law (4th edn, Cambridge University Press, reprinted 2001)Google Scholar

Shepel, Harm, The Constitution of Private Governance: Product Standards in the Regulation of Integrating Markets (Hart Publishing, 2005)Google Scholar

Singer, Peter, Animal Liberation: A New Ethics for our Treatment of Animals (Cape, 1976)Google Scholar

Slaughter, Anne-Marie, A New World Order (Princeton University Press, 2005)Google Scholar

Snyder, Francis, ‘Thinking about “Interests”: Legislative Process in the European Community’ in Starr, June and Collier, Jane (eds.) History and Power in the Study of Law: New Directions in Legal Anthropology (Cornell University Press, 1989) 168Google Scholar

Stiglitz, Joseph, Globalization and its Discontents (Norton, 2002)Google Scholar

Stokke, Olav Schram and Coffey, Clare, ‘Institutional Interplay and Responsible Fisheries: Combating Subsidies, Developing Precaution’ in Oberthür, Sebastian and Gehring, Thomas, Institutional Interaction in Global Environmental Governance (MIT Press, 2006) 127Google Scholar

Stokke, Olav Schram (ed.), Governing High Seas Fisheries: The Interplay of Global and Regional Regimes (Oxford University Press, 2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stone, Christopher, ‘Should Trees Have Standing? Toward Legal Rights for Natural Objects’ in Stone, Christopher, Should Trees Have Standing? And Other Essays on Law, Morals, and the Environment (Oceana Publications, 1996) 1 (first published Southern California Law Review 1972)Google Scholar

Stone, Christopher, ‘Should We Establish A Guardian For Future Generations?’ in Stone, Christopher, Should Trees Have Standing? And Other Essays on Law, Morals, and the Environment (Oceana Publications, 1996), 65Google Scholar

Stone, Christopher, The Gnat is Older than Man: Global Environment and Human Agenda (Princeton University Press, 1993)Google Scholar

Stone, Christopher, ‘Too Many Fishing Boats, Too Few Fish: Can Trade Laws Trim Subsidies and Restore the Balance in Global Fisheries?’ in Gallagher, Keven P and Werksman, Jacob (eds.) International Trade and Sustainable Development (Earthscan Publications Ltd, 2002) 286Google Scholar

Toope, Stephen, ‘Emerging Patterns of Governance and International Law’ in Byers, Michael (ed.) The Role of Law in International Politics: Essays in International Relations and International Law (Oxford University Press, 2000) 91Google Scholar

Torgerson, Douglas, ‘Limits of the Administrative Mind: The Problem of Defining Environmental Problems’ in Dryzek, John and Schlosberg, David (eds.) Debating the Earth (Oxford University Press, 1999) 110Google Scholar

Trubek, Louise, ‘New Governance Practices in US Health Care’ in Búrca, Gráinne and Scott, Joanne (eds.) Law and New Governance in the EU and the US (Hart Publishing, 2006) 245Google Scholar

Victor, David, Raustiala, Kal and Skolnikoff, Eugene, ‘Introduction and Overview’ in Victor, David, Raustiala, Kal and Skolnikoff, Eugene (eds.) The Implementation and Effectiveness of International Environmental Commitments: Theory and Practice (International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, 1998) 1Google Scholar

Vicuña, Francisco Orrego, The Changing International Law of High Seas Fisheries (Cambridge University Press, 1999)Google Scholar

Warner, Robin, Protecting the Oceans Beyond National Jurisdiction: Strengthening the International Law Framework (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Watts, Arthur (ed.) The International Law Commission 1949–1998 (Oxford University Press, 1999)

Young, Margaret A., Regime Interaction in International Law: Facing Fragmentation (Cambridge University Press, forthcoming)CrossRef

Young, Oran, International Cooperation: Building Regimes for Natural Resources and the Environment (Cornell University Press, 1989)Google Scholar

Abbott, Frederick, ‘Distributed Governance at the WTO-WIPO: An Evolving Model for Open-Architecture Integrated Governance’ (2000) 3 Journal of International Economic Law63CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Abi-Saab, Georges, ‘Whither the International Community?’ (1997) 9 European Journal of International Law248CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alston, Philip, ‘Resisting the Merger and Acquisition of Human Rights by Trade Law: A Reply to Petersmann’ (2002) 13 European Journal of International Law815CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alvarez, José, ‘The New Treaty Makers’ (2002) 25 Boston College International and Comparative Law Journal213Google Scholar

,Anonymous, ‘Rethinking Regulation: Negotiation as an Alternative to Traditional Rulemaking’ (1981) 94 Harvard Law Review1871CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aust, Anthony, ‘The Theory and Practice of Informal International Instruments’ (1986) 35 International and Comparative Law Quarterly787CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bagwell, Kyle, Mavroidis, Petros and Staiger, Robert, ‘It's a Question of Market Access’ (2002) 96 American Journal of International Law56CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartels, Lorand, ‘Applicable Law in WTO Dispute Settlement Proceedings’ (2001) 35 Journal of World Trade499CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benvenisti, Eyal, ‘Exit and Voice in the Age of Globalization’ (1999) 98 Michigan Law Review167CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benvenisti, Eyal, ‘The Interplay between Actors as a Determinant of the Evolution of Administrative Law in International Institutions’ (2006) 68 Law and Contemporary Problems319Google Scholar

Bhagwati, Jagdish, ‘Afterword: The Question of Linkage’ (2002) 96 American Journal of International Law126CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bigdeli, Sadeq Z, ‘Will the “Friends of Climate” Emerge in the WTO? The Prospects of Applying the “Fisheries Subsidies” Model to Energy Subsidies’ (2008) 1 Carbon & Climate Law Review78Google Scholar

Boyle, Alan, ‘The Southern Bluefin Tuna Arbitration’ (2001) 50 International and Comparative Law Quarterly447CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bronckers, Marco, ‘More Power to the WTO?’ (2001) 4 Journal of International Economic Law41CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brunnée, Jutta and Toope, Stephen, ‘International Law and Constructivism: Elements of an Interactional Theory of International Law’ (2000) Columbia Journal of Transnational Law19Google Scholar

Buckingham, Donald and Phillips, Peter, ‘Hot Potato, Hot Potato: Regulating Products of Biotechnology by the International Community’ (2001) 35 Journal of World Trade1CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buzbee, William, ‘Recognizing the Regulatory Commons: A Theory of Regulatory Gaps’ (2003) 89 Iowa Law Review1Google Scholar

Carmody, Chios, ‘WTO Obligations as Collective’ (2006) 17 European Journal of International Law419CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carr, Christopher and Scheiber, Harry, ‘Dealing with a Resource Crisis: Regulatory Regimes for Managing the World's Marine Fisheries’ (2002) 21 Stanford Environmental Law Journal45Google Scholar

Cavallero, Eric, ‘Federative Global Democracy’ (2009) 40 Metaphilosophy42CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chang, Seung Wha, ‘WTO Disciplines on Fisheries Subsidies: A Historic Step Towards Sustainability?’ (2003) 6 Journal of International Economic Law879CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Charnovitz, Steve, ‘Belgian Family Allowances and the Challenge of Origin-Based Discrimination’ (2005) 4 World Trade Review7CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Charnovitz, Steve, ‘Nongovernmental Organizations and International Law’ (2006) 100 American Journal of International Law348CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Charnovitz, Steve, ‘The WTO's Environment Progress’ (2007) 10 Journal of International Economic Law685CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Charnovitz, Steve, ‘Triangulating the World Trade Organization’ (2002) 96 American Journal of International Law28CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Charnovitz, Steve, ‘WTO Cosmopolitics’ (2002) 34 NYU Journal of International Law and Politics299Google Scholar

Chaytor, Beatrice, ‘An Examination of Trade and Environmental Policy Responses to the Challenge of Fisheries Subsidies’ (1999) 8 Review of European Community & International Environmental Law275CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cho, Sungjoon, ‘Linkage of Free Trade and Social Regulation: Moving beyond the Entropic Dilemma’ (2005) 5 Chicago Journal of International Law625Google Scholar

Churchill, Robin and Scott, Joanne, ‘The Mox Plant Litigation: The First Half-Life’ (2004) 53 International and Comparative Law Quarterly643CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Churchill, Robin and Ulfstein, Geir, ‘Autonomous Institutional Arrangements in Multilateral Environmental Agreements: A Little-Noticed Phenomenon in International Law’ (2000) 94 American Journal of International Law623CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohen, Joshua and Sabel, Charles, ‘Global Democracy?’ (2005) 37 NYU Journal of International Law and Politics763Google Scholar

Cooney, Rosie, ‘CITES and the CBD: Tensions and Synergies’ (2001) 10 Review of European Community & International Environmental Law259CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cooney, Rosie and Lang, Andrew, ‘Taking Uncertainty Seriously: Adaptive Governance and International Trade’ (2007) 18 European Journal of International Law523CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Currie, Duncan E J and Wowk, Kateryna, ‘Climate Change and CO2 in the Oceans and Global Oceans Governance’ (2009) 4 Carbon and Climate Law Review387Google Scholar

Curtin, Deirdre, ‘Private Interest Representation or Civil Society Deliberation? A Contemporary Dilemma for European Union Governance’ (2003) 12 Social and Legal Studies55CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davey, William, ‘The Case for a WTO Permanent Panel Body’ (2003) 6 Journal of International Economic Law177CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Delbrück, Jost, ‘The Earl A Snyder Lecture in International Law: Transnational Federalism: Problems and Prospects of Allocating Public Authority Beyond the State’ (2004) 11 Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies31CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dillon, Sara, ‘A Farewell to “Linkage”: International Trade Law and Global Sustainability Indicators’ (2002) 55 Rutgers Law Review87Google Scholar

Dorf, Michael and Sabel, Charles, ‘A Constitution of Democratic Experimentalism’ (1998) 98 Columbia Law Review267CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dunoff, Jeffrey, ‘Border Patrol at the World Trade Organization’ (1998) 9 Yearbook of International Environmental Law20CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dunoff, Jeffrey, ‘Does Globalization Advance Human Rights?’ (1999) 25 Brooklyn Journal of International Law125Google Scholar

Dunoff, Jeffrey, ‘Rethinking International Trade’ (1998) 19 University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic Law347Google Scholar

Dunoff, Jeffrey, ‘The Death of the Trade Regime’ (1999) 10 European Journal of International Law733CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eckersley, Robyn, ‘A Green Public Sphere in the WTO?: The Amicus Curiae Interventions in the Transatlantic Biotech Dispute’ (2007) 13 European Journal of International Relations329CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edwards, Holly, ‘When Predators Become Prey: The Need for International Shark Conservation’ (2007) 12 Ocean and Coastal Law Journal305Google Scholar

Esty, Daniel ‘Stepping Up to the Global Environmental Challenge’ (1996–97) 8 Fordham Environmental Law Journal103Google Scholar

Fischer-Lescano, Andreas and Teubner, Gunther, ‘Regime-collisions: The Vain Search for Legal Unity in the Fragmentation of Global Law’ (2004) 25 Michigan Journal of International Law999Google Scholar

Franckx, Erik, ‘Pacta Tertiis and the Agreement for the Implementation of the Straddling and Highly Migratory Fish Stocks Provisions of the UNCLOS’ (2000) 8 Tulane Journal of International and Comparative Law49Google Scholar

French, Duncan ‘Treaty Interpretation and the Incorporation of Extraneous Legal Rules’ (2006) 55 International and Comparative Law Quarterly281CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gazzini, Tarcisio, ‘Can Authoritative Interpretation under Article IX:2 of the Agreement Establishing the WTO Modify the Rights and Obligations of Members?’ (2008) 57 International and Comparative Law Quarterly169CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gillespie, Alexander, ‘Forum Shopping in International Environmental Law: the IWC, CITES, and the Management of Cetaceans’ (2002) 33 Ocean Development and International Law17CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goote, Maas, ‘Convention on Biological Diversity: The Jakarta Mandate on Marine Coastal Biological Diversity’ (1997) 12 International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law377Google Scholar

Goodin, Robert E, ‘Enfranchising All Affected Interests, and Its Alternatives’ (2007) 35 Philosophy & Public Affairs1CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grynberg, Roman and Rochester, Natallie, ‘The Emerging Architecture of a World Trade Organization Fisheries Subsidies Agreement and the Interests of Developing Coastal States’ (2005) 39 Journal of World Trade503Google Scholar

Guzman, Andrew, ‘Global Governance and the WTO’ (2004) 45 Harvard International Law Journal303Google Scholar

Haas, Peter, ‘Addressing the Global Governance Deficit’ (2004) 4 Global Environmental Politics1CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haas, Peter, ‘Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination’ (1992) 46 International Organization1CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hallum, Victoria, ‘International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea: The Mox Nuclear Plant Case’ (2002) 11 Review of European Community & International Environmental Law372CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hardin, Garrett, ‘The Tragedy of the Commons’ (1968) Science1243Google ScholarPubMed

Heerey, Justice Peter, ‘Recent Australian Developments’ (2004) 23 Civil Justice Quarterly 386Google Scholar

Henriksen, Tore, ‘Revisiting the Freedom of Fishing and Legal Obligations on States Not Party to Regional Fisheries Management Organizations’ (2009) 40 Ocean Development and International Law80CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hershkoff, Helen and Kingsbury, Benedict, ‘Crisis, Community, and Courts in Network Governance: A Response to Liebman and Sabel's Approach to Reform of Public Education’ (2003) 28 NYU Review of Law & Social Change319Google Scholar

Higgins, Rosalyn, ‘Time and the Law: International Perspectives on an Old Problem’ (1997) 46 International and Comparative Law Quarterly501CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hocking, Brian, ‘Changing the Terms of Trade Policy Making: From the “Club” to the “Multistakeholder” Model’ (2004) 3 World Trade Review3CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hollis, Duncan, ‘Why State Consent Still Matters – Non-State Actors, Treaties, and the Changing Sources of International Law’ (2005) 23 Berkeley Journal of International Law1Google Scholar

Horn, Henrik and Mavroidis, Petros, ‘Still Hazy after All These Years: The Interpretation of National Treatment in the GATT/WTO Case Law on Tax Discrimination’ (2004) 15 European Journal of International Law39CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Howse, Robert, ‘From Politics to Technocracy – and Back Again: The Fate of the Multilateral Trading Regime’ (2002) 96 American Journal of International Law94CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Howse, Robert, ‘Human Rights in the WTO: Whose Rights, What Humanity? Comment on Petersmann’ (2002) 13 European Journal of International Law651CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Howse, Robert, ‘Membership and its Privileges: The WTO, Civil Society, and the Amicus Brief Controversy’ (2003) 9 European Law Journal496CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Howse, Robert, ‘The Sardines Panel and AB Rulings – Some Preliminary Reactions’ (2002) 29(3) Legal Issues of Economic Integration247CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hsieh, Chih-haoet al., ‘Fishing Elevates Variability in the Abundance of Exploited Species’ (2006) 443 Nature859CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Jackson, John, ‘Sovereignty Modern: A New Approach to an Outdated Concept’ (2003) 97 American Journal of International Law782CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jenks, Wilfred, ‘Conflict of Law-Making Treaties’ (1953) 30 British Year Book of International Law401Google Scholar

Joyner, Christopher C, ‘Biodiversity in the Marine Environment: Resource Implications for the Law of the Sea’ (1995) 28 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law635Google Scholar

Karkkainen, Bradley, ‘Post-Sovereign Environmental Governance’ (2004) 4 Global Environmental Politics72CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kelly, Claire, ‘Power, Linkage and Accommodation: The WTO as an International Actor and Its Influence on Other Actors and Regimes’ (2006) 24 Berkeley Journal of International Law79Google Scholar

Kelly, Claire, ‘The Value Vacuum: Self-enforcing Regimes and the Dilution of the Normative Feedback Loop’ (2001) 22 Michigan Journal of International Law673Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans, ‘Sovereignty and International Law’ (1960) 48 Georgetown Law Journal627Google Scholar

Kennedy, David, ‘The Mystery of Global Governance’ (2008) 34 Ohio Northern University Law Review827Google Scholar

Kingsbury, Benedict ‘First Amendment Liberalism as Global Legal Architecture: Ascriptive Groups and the Problems of the Liberal NGO Model of International Civil Society’ (2002) 2 Chicago Journal of International Law183Google Scholar

Kingsbury, Benedict, ‘Sovereignty and Inequality’ (1998) 9 European Journal of International Law599CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kingsbury, Benedict, Krisch, Nico and Stewart, Richard, ‘The Emergence of Global Administrative Law’ (2005) 68 Law and Contemporary Problems15Google Scholar

Koh, Harold, ‘Why Do Nations Obey International Law?’ (1997) 106 Yale Law Journal2599CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti, ‘Hierarchy in International Law: A Sketch’ (1997) 8 European Journal of International Law566CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti, ‘International Law and Hegemony: A Reconfiguration’ (2004) 17 Cambridge Review of International Affairs197CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti, ‘International Law: Constitutionalism, Managerialism and the Ethos of Legal Education’ (2007) 1 European Journal of Legal Studies (online)Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti, ‘The Fate of Public International Law: Between Technique and Politics’ (2007) 70 Modern Law Review1CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti and Leino, Päivi, ‘Fragmentation of International Law? Postmodern Anxieties’ (2002) 15 Leiden Journal of International Law553CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krisch, Nico, ‘The Pluralism of Global Administrative Law’ (2006) 17 European Journal of International Law247CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kysar, Douglas, ‘Preferences for Processes: The Process/Product Distinction and the Regulation of Consumer Choice’ (2004) 118 Harvard Law Review525CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lamy, Pascal, ‘The Place of the WTO and its Law in the International Legal Order’ (2006) 17 European Journal of International Law969CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lang, Andrew, ‘Reflecting on “Linkage”: Cognitive and Institutional Change in The International Trading System’ (2007) 70 Modern Law Review523CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leebron, David, ‘Linkages’ (2002) 96 American Journal of International Law5CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levit, Janet Koven, ‘A Bottom-Up Approach to International Lawmaking: The Tale of Three Trade Finance Instruments’ (2005) 30 Yale Journal of International Law125Google Scholar

Lindroos, Anja and Mehling, Michael, ‘Dispelling the Chimera of “Self-Contained Regimes”: International Law and the WTO’ (2006) 16 European Journal of International Law857CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Little, Laura and Orellana, Marcos A, ‘Can CITES Play a Role in Solving the Problems of IUU Fishing?: The Trouble with Patagonian Toothfish’ (2004) 16 Colorado Journal of International Environmental Law and Policy21Google Scholar

Lloyd, Peter, ‘When Should New Areas of Rules be Added to the WTO?’ (2005) 4 World Trade Review275CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lowe, Vaughan, ‘Book review: Sovereignty, the WTO and Changing Fundamentals of International Law’ (2007) 101 American Journal of International Law234CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martínez-Garmendia, Josué and Anderson, James L, ‘Conservation, Markets, and Fisheries Policy: The North Atlantic Bluefin Tuna and the Japanese Sashimi Market’ (2005) Agribusiness 17Google Scholar

Marceau, Gabrielle, ‘Conflict of Norms and Conflicts of Jurisdictions: The Relationship Between the WTO Agreement and MEAs and Other Treaties’ (2001) 35 Journal of World Trade1081CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marceau, Gabrielle and Stilwell, Matthew, ‘Practical Suggestions for Amicus Curiae Briefs Before WTO Adjudicating Bodies’ (2001) 4 Journal of International Economic Law155CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Matthews, Paul, ‘Problems Related to the Convention on the International Trade in Endangered Species’ (1996) 45 International and Comparative Law Quarterly421CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McLachlan, Campbell, ‘The Principle of Systemic Integration and Article 31(3)(c) of the Vienna Convention’ (2005) 54 International and Comparative Law Quarterly279CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McLaughlin, Richard, ‘Settling Trade-Related Disputes Over the Protection of Marine Living Resources: UNCLOS or the WTO?’ (1997) 10 Georgetown International Environmental Law Review29Google Scholar

Motaal, Doaa Abdel, ‘The “Multilateral Scientific Consensus” and the World Trade Organization’ (2004) 38 Journal of World Trade855Google Scholar

Murphy, James B, ‘Alternative Approaches to the CITES “Non-Detriment” Finding for Appendix II Species’ (2006) 36 Environmental Law531Google Scholar

Orellana, Marcos, ‘The Swordfish Dispute between the EU and Chile at the ITLOS and the WTO’ (2002) 71 Nordic Journal of International Law55CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Palmeter, David and Mavroidis, Petros, ‘The WTO Legal System: Sources of Law’ (1998) 92 American Journal of International Law398CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pauwelyn, Joost, ‘A Typology of Multilateral Treaty Obligations: Are WTO Obligations Bilateral or Collective in Nature?’ (2003) 14 European Journal of International Law907CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pauwelyn, Joost, ‘How to Win a World Trade Organization Dispute Based on Non-World Trade Organization Law?’ (2003) 37 Journal of World Trade997Google Scholar

Pauwelyn, Joost, ‘Recent Books on Trade and Environment: GATT Phantoms Still Haunt the WTO’ (2004) 15 European Journal of International Law575CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peraute, N C, Pajaro, M G, Meeuwig, J J and Vincent, A C J, ‘Biology of a Seahorse Species, Hippocampus Comes in the Central Philippines’ (2002) 60 Journal of Fish Biology821CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich, ‘Addressing Institutional Challenges to the WTO in the New Millennium: A Longer-Term Perspective’ (2005) 8 Journal of International Economic Law647CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich, ‘Taking Human Dignity, Poverty and Empowerment of Individuals More Seriously: Rejoinder to Alston’ (2002) 13 European Journal of International Law845CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich, ‘Time for a United Nations “Global Compact” for Integrating Human Rights in the Law of Worldwide Organizations: Lessons from European Integration’ (2002) 13 European Journal of International Law621CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ratner, Stephen, ‘Regulatory Takings in Institutional Context: Beyond the Fear of Fragmented International Law’ (2008) 102 American Journal of International Law475CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Raustiala, Kal and Victor, David, ‘The Regime Complex for Plant Genetic Resources’ (2004) 58 International Organization277CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rayfuse, Rosemary, Rayfuse, Rosemary, ‘The Future of Compulsory Dispute Settlement Under The Law of the Sea Convention’ (2005) 36 Victoria University of Wellington Law Review683Google Scholar

Rayfuse, Rosemary, ‘The United Nations Agreement on Straddling and Highly Migratory Fish Stocks as an Objective Regime: A Case of Wishful Thinking?’ (1999) 20 Australian Year Book of International Law253CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rayfuse, Rosemary and Warner, Robin, ‘Securing a Sustainable Future for the Oceans Beyond National Jurisdiction: The Legal Basis for an Integrated Cross-Sectoral Regime for High Seas Governance for the 21st Century’ (2008) 23(3) The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law399CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rayfuse, Rosemaryet al., ‘Australia and Canada in Regional Fisheries Organizations: Implementing the United Nations Fish Stocks Agreement’ (2003) 36 The Dalhousie Law Journal47Google Scholar

Reisman, W Michael, ‘International Lawmaking: A Process of Communication’ (1981) 75 American Society of International Law Proceedings101Google Scholar

Rittel, Horst and Webber, Melvin, ‘Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning’ (1973) 4 Policy Sciences155CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roessler, Frieder, ‘Comment on a WTO Permanent Panel Body – The Cobra Effects of the WTO Panel Selection Procedures’ (2003) 6 Journal of International Economic Law230Google Scholar

Rose, Gregory, ‘Marine Biodiversity Protection through Fisheries Management – International Legal Developments’ (1999) 8 Review of European Community & International Environmental Law284CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Safrin, Sabrina, ‘Treaties in Collision? The Biosafety Protocol and the World Trade Organization Agreements’ (2002) 96 American Journal of International Law606CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sand, Peter, ‘Japan's “Research Whaling” in the Antarctic Southern Ocean and the North Pacific Ocean in the Face of the Endangered Species Convention (CITES)’ (2008) 17(1) Review of European Community & International Environmental Law56CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sarfaty, Galit, ‘Why Culture Matters in International Institutions: The Marginality of Human Rights at the World Bank’ (2009) 103 American Journal of International Law647Google Scholar

Schachter, Oscar, ‘The Twilight Existence of Nonbinding International Agreements’ (1977) 71 American Journal of International Law296CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scheiber, Harry N, Mengerink, Kathryn J and Song, Yann-huei, ‘Ocean Tuna Fisheries, East Asian Rivalries, and International Regulation: Japanese Policies and the Overcapacity/IUU Fishing Conundrum’ (2007) 30 University of Hawai'i Law Review97Google Scholar

Scheuerman, William, ‘Democratic Experimentalism or Capitalist Synchronization? Critical Reflections on Directly-Deliberative Polyarchy’ (2004) XVII Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence101CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scott, Joanne, ‘International Trade and Environmental Governance: Relating Rules (and Standards) in the EU and the WTO’ (2004) 15 European Journal of International Law307CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scott, Joanne and Sturm, Susan, ‘Courts as Catalysts: Rethinking the Judicial Role in New Governance’ (2007) 13 Columbia Journal of European Law565Google Scholar

Shaffer, Gregory, ‘The WTO Under Challenge: Democracy and the Law and Politics of the WTO's Treatment of Trade and Environment Matters’ (2001) 25 Harvard Environmental Law Review1Google Scholar

Shaffer, Gregory and Pollack, Mark A, ‘Hard vs Soft Law: Alternatives, Complements and Antagonists in International Governance’ (2010) 94 Minnesota Law Review706Google Scholar

Shell, G Richard, ‘The Trade Stakeholders Model and Participation by Nonstate Parties in the World Trade Organization’ (1996) 17 University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic Law359Google Scholar

Shell, G Richard, ‘Trade Legalism and International Relations Theory: An Analysis of the World Trade Organization’ (1995) 44 Duke Law Journal829CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simma, Bruno, ‘Self-Contained Regimes’ (1985) 16 Netherlands Yearbook of International Law, 111CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simma, Bruno and Paulus, Andreas L, ‘The “International Community”: Facing the Challenge of Globalisation’ (1998) 9 European Journal of International Law266CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Slaughter, Anne-Marie, ‘International Law and International Relations Theory: A Dual Agenda’ (1993) 87 American Journal of International Law205Google Scholar

Somek, Alexander, ‘Kelsen Lives’ (2007) 18 European Journal of International Law409CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stein, Eleanor, ‘The Arc of Consequence: Time for a New Ecocriticism?’ (2008) 17 Social and Legal Studies123CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stein, Eric, ‘International Integration and Democracy: No Love at First Sight’ (2001) 95 American Journal of International Law489CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stephens, Tim, ‘The Limits of International Adjudication in International Environmental Law: Another Perspective on the Southern Bluefin Tuna Case’ (2004) 19 International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law177CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stiglitz, Joseph ‘A New Agenda for Global Warming’ (2006) 3:7The Economists' Voice available at http://www.bepress.com/ev/vol3/iss7/art3CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sturm, Susan, ‘The Architecture of Inclusion: Advancing Workplace Equity in Higher Education’ (2006) 29 Harvard Journal of Law & Gender247Google Scholar

Swanson, Timothy, ‘The Evolving Trade Mechanisms in CITES’ (1992) 1 Review of European Community & International Environmental Law57CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tarullo, Daniel, ‘Logic, Myth, and the International Economic Order’ (1985) 26 Harvard International Law Journal533Google Scholar

Tietje, Christian, ‘Global Governance and Inter-Agency Co-operation in International Economic Law’ (2002) 26 Journal of World Trade501CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Trachtman, Joel, ‘Institutional Linkage: Transcending “Trade and …”’ (2002) 96 American Journal of International Law77CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Trachtman, Joel, ‘Trade and … Problems, Cost-Benefit Analysis and Subsidiarity’ (1998) 9 European Journal of International Law32CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Umbricht, Georg, ‘An “Amicus Curiae Brief” on Amicus Curiae Briefs at the WTO’ (2001) 4 Journal of International Economic Law773CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Walker, Terence, ‘Can Shark Resources be Harvested Sustainably?’ (1998) 49 Marine & Freshwater Research553CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weiler, Joseph, ‘The Geology of International Law – Governance, Democracy and Legitimacy’ (2004) 64 ZaöRV547Google Scholar

Weiler, Joseph and Paulus, Andreas, ‘The Structure and Change in International Law or Is There a Hierarchy of Norms in International Law?’ (1997) 8 European Journal of International Law545CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Widdows, Kelvin, ‘What is an Agreement in International Law’ (1979) 50 British Year Book of International Law117CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wiener, Jonathan, ‘On the Political Economy of Global Environmental Regulation’ (1999) 97 Georgetown Law Journal749Google Scholar

Wiers, Jochem, ‘French Ideas on Climate and Trade Policies’ (2008) 1 Carbon and Climate Law Review18Google Scholar

Witbooi, Emma, ‘Governing Global Fisheries: Commons, Community Law and Third Country Coastal Waters’ (2008) 17 Social Legal Studies369CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wold, Chris, ‘Multilateral Environment Agreements and the GATT: Conflict and Resolution?’ (1996) 26 Environmental Law841Google Scholar

Wold, Chris, ‘Natural Resource Management and Conservation: Trade in Endangered Species’ (2002) 13 Yearbook of International Environmental Law389Google Scholar

Worm, Boriset al., ‘Impacts of Biodiversity Loss on Ocean Ecosystem Services’ (2006) 314 Science787CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Worm, Boris, et al., ‘Rebuilding Global Fisheries’ (2009) 325 ScienceCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Yeater, Marceil and Vasquez, Juan, ‘Demystifing the Relationship Between CITES and the WTO’ (2001) 10 Review of European Community & International Environmental Law271CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Young, Margaret A., ‘Fragmentation or Interaction: The WTO, Fisheries Subsidies, and International Law’ (2009) 8 World Trade Review477CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Young, Margaret, ‘Protecting Endangered Marine Species: Collaboration between the Food and Agriculture Organization and the CITES Regime’ (2010) 11 Melbourne Journal of International Law441Google Scholar

Young, Margaret, ‘The WTO's Use of Relevant Rules of International Law: An Analysis of the Biotech Case’ (2007) 56 International and Comparative Law Quarterly907Google Scholar

Young, Margaret, ‘WTO Undercurrents at the Court of Justice’ (2005) 30 European Law Review211Google Scholar

Young, Oran, ‘The Politics of International Regime Formation: Managing Natural Resources and the Environment’ (1989) 43 International Organization349CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zahrnt, Valentin, ‘Domestic Constituents and the Formulation of WTO Negotiating Positions: What the Delegates Say’ (2008) 7 World Trade Review393CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zonnekeyn, Geert A ‘The Appellate Body's Communication on Amicus Curiae Briefs in the Asbestos Case: An Echternach Procession?’ (2001) 35 Journal of World Trade553CrossRefGoogle Scholar

––– ‘EU, Mauritania Renegotiate Fisheries Access Agreement’ (2008) 8:5Bridges Trade BioRes (Trade and Biological Resources News Digest) (20 March 2008)

––– ‘Friends of Fish Denounce EU Aid Package’, Financial Times (17 June 2006)

––– ‘Shark Species Face Extinction Amid Overfishing and Appetite for Fins’ Guardian (18 February 2008) 11

Benitah, Marc, ‘Five Suggestions for Clarifying the Draft Text on Fisheries Subsidies (2008) 12:1 Bridges Trade and Biological Resources News Digest21Google Scholar

Benitah, Marc, ‘Ongoing WTO Negotiations on Fisheries Subsidies’ ASIL Insight (June 2004)

Bernasconi-Osterwalder, Nathalie, ‘Interpreting WTO Law and the Relevance of Multilateral Environmental Agreements in EC-Biotech’, Background note to presentation at BIICL WTO Conference, May 2007, available on the website of the Center for International Environmental Law (www.ciel.org)

Butler, Leah, ‘Effects and Outcomes of Amicus Curiae Briefs at the WTO: An Assessment of NGO Experiences’ (2006) (unpublished manuscript at http://ist-socrates.berkeley.edu/~es196/projects/2006final/butler.pdf)

Gaski, Andrea L, An Examination of the International Trade in Bluefin Tuna with an Emphasis on the Japanese Market (1993, TRAFFIC International)Google Scholar

Khor, Martin, ‘Debate on Policy Space Dominates UNCTAD Review’ TWN Info Service on WTO and Trade Issues (May06/10) (13 May 2006)

Knirsch, Juergen, Mittler, Daniel, Kaiser, Martin, Sack, Karen, Thies, Christoph, Edwards, Larry, Deadly Subsidies: How Government Funds are Killing Oceans and Forests and Why the CBD Rather Than the WTO Should Stop This Perverse Use of Public Money (Greenpeace International (undated, circa 2006)Google Scholar

McKie, Robin, ‘Push to Ban Trade in Endangered Bluefin Tuna’ The Observer (14 February 2010)

Pfahl, Stefanie, ‘Is the WTO the Only Way?’ Briefing Paper for Greenpeace International and Friends of the Earth, (undated, circa 2005)

Schorr, David, Healthy Fisheries, Sustainable Trade: Crafting New Rules on Fishing Subsidies in the World Trade Organization (WWF Position Paper and Technical Resource, 2004)Google Scholar

Schorr, David, ‘Towards Rational Disciplines on Subsidies to the Fishery Sector: A Call for New International Rules and Mechanisms’ in WWF, The Footprint of Distant Water Fleets on World Fisheries (1998)

Schorr, David and Caddy, John, Sustainability Criteria for Fisheries Subsidies: Options for the WTO and Beyond (commissioned by UNEP and WWF) (2007)Google Scholar

Shaffer, Gregory and Mosoti, Victor, ‘EC Sardines: A New Model for Collaboration in Dispute Settlement?’ (2002) 6:7BRIDGES 15Google Scholar

Turner, Pamela S, ‘Struggling to Save the Seahorse’ National Wildlife (6 January 2005)

,World Wide Fund for Nature, Hard Facts, Hidden Problems, A Review of Current Data on Fishing Subsidies (2001) 18

,WWF, TRAFFIC, IUCN, ‘Regulating International Trade in Commercial Marine Fisheries Products’ (February 2002). See also excerpts from Bridges Digest (BRIDGES Weekly Trade News Digest) (various)

,Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation, Study into the Nature and Extent of Subsidies in the Fisheries Sector of APEC Member Economies (2000)

,CITES, Animal Committee, AC19 WG3 Doc. 1, Summary of the Report of the 19th meeting of the CITES Animal Committee (18–21 August 2003)

,CBD, CoP5 Decision, ‘Ecosystem Approach’, Nairobi, 15–26 May 2000 (Decision V/6); CoP7 Decision, ‘Ecosystem Approach’, Kuala Lumpur, 9–20 February 2004 (Decision VII/11)

,CITES CoP12 Doc. 16.2.1, ‘Synergy and cooperation between CITES and FAO’ (Japan) (30 August 2002)

,CITES CoP12 Doc. 16.2.2, ‘FAO collaboration with CITES through a Memorandum of Understanding’ (United States) (01/10/02)

,CITES CoP12 Doc. 58 (Criteria for amendment of Appendices I and II) (2002)

,CITES CoP13 Doc. 12.3 (‘Revision of Resolution Conf. 12.4 on Cooperation between CITES and the Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources regarding trade in toothfish [Australia]’)

,CITES CoP13 Doc. 57 (Criteria for amendment of Appendices I and II) (2004)

,CITES CoP14 Doc.18.1 (Cooperation with the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations)

,CITES Doc. CoP14 Inf. 38, Information Submitted for fourteenth meeting of the Conference of the Parties, The Hague (Netherlands) 3–15 June 2007

,CITES SC 54. Doc 19 ‘Introduction from the Sea’ (15 August 2006) submitted to fifty-fourth meeting of the CITES Standing Committee (Switzerland) (2–6 October 2006)

,CITES Doc SC49 Summary Report (Rev. 1), Forty-ninth meeting of the Standing Committee, Geneva, 22–25 April 2003

,CITES Doc SC50-Summary Report, Fiftieth meeting of the Standing Committee (Geneva (Switzerland), 15–19 March 2004)

,CITES Doc SC53 Doc 10, Annex (Geneva (Switzerland), 27 June–1 July 2005)

,CITES Doc SC53 Summary Report (Geneva (Switzerland), 27 June–1 July 2005)

,CITES Doc SC54 Doc.8 (Geneva (Switzerland), 2–6 October 2006)

,CITES Press Release, ‘CITES Conference to Consider New Trade Rules for Marine, Timber and Other Wildlife Species’, Geneva, May 2007 http://www.cites.org/eng/news/press/2007/0705_presskit.shtml

,CITES SC49 Doc. 6.3, reproducing Notification No. 2003/030, Geneva, 6 May 2003

,CITES SC49 Doc. Inf. 3 ‘Proposal from Japan’, Informal Document submitted to forty-ninth meeting of the Standing Committee, Geneva, 22–25 April 2003

,CITES SC51 Doc.8 (Bangkok, (Thailand) 1 October 2004)

,European Commission, Handbook for Trade Sustainability Impact Assessment (2006)

,United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, Fisheries and Aquaculture Report No. 902, Report of the twenty-eighth session of the Committee on Fisheries, 2–6 March 2009

,United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, FAO Fisheries Circular No. 940, Rome, April 1999, Gail Lugten, ‘A Review of Measures Taken by Regional Marine Fishery Bodies to Address Contemporary Fishery Issues’

,United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, FAO Fisheries Report No. 293, William Burke, ‘1982 Convention on the Law of the Sea Provisions on Conditions of Access to Fisheries Subject to National Jurisdiction’, Report of the Export Consultation on the Conditions of Access to the Fish Resources of the Exclusive Economic Zone (1983) 23

,United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, FAO Fisheries Report No. 613, Report of the Technical Consultation on the Measurement of Fishing Capacity (FIPP/R615(En)) (FAO, 2000)

,United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, FAO Fisheries Report No. 655, Report of the 24th Session of the Committee on Fisheries, 26 February–2 March 2001

,United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, FAO Fisheries Report No. 667, Second Technical Consultation on the Suitability of the CITES Criteria for Listing Commercially-Exploited Aquatic Species, Namibia, 22–25 October 2001

,United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, FAO Report No. 673, Report of the eighth session of the Sub-Committee on Fish Trade, Bremen, Germany, 12–16 February 2002

,United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, Fisheries Report No. 702, Report of the twenty-fifth session of the Committee on Fisheries, 24–28 February 2003

,United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, Fisheries Report No. 736, Report of the ninth session of the Sub Committee on Fish Trade, Bremen, Germany, 10–14 February 2004

,United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, FAO Fisheries Report No. 741, Report of the Expert Consultation on Implementation Issues Associated with Listing Commercially-Exploited Aquatic Species on CITES Appendices, 25–28 May 2004

,FAO, Fisheries Report No. 746, Report of the Expert Consultation on Legal Issues Related to CITES and Commercially-Exploited Aquatic Species United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, 22–25 June 2004

,United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, FAO Fisheries Report No. 780, Report of the twenth-sixth session of the Committee on Fisheries, 7–11 March 2005

,United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, Fisheries Report No. 807, Report of the tenth session of the Sub-Committee on Fish Trade, 30 May–2 June 2006

,United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, Fisheries Report No. 830, Report of the twenty-seventh session of the Committee on Fisheries, 5–9 March 2007

,United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, Fisheries Report No. 833, Report of the second FAO Ad Hoc Expert Advisory Panel for the Assessment of Proposals to Amend Appendices I and II of CITES Concerning Commercially-Exploited Aquatic Species, 26–30 March 2007

,United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, FAO Fisheries Technical Paper No. 389, Stefania Vannuccini, ‘Shark Utilization, Marketing and Trade’ (1999) (www.fao.org/docrep/005/x3690e/x3690e00.htm)

,United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, FAO Fisheries Technical Paper No. 433/1, Ward, J M, Kirkley, J E, Metzner, R and Pascoe, S, ‘Measuring and Assessing Capacity in Fisheries: 1. Basic Concepts and Management Options’ (2004)

,United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, FAO Fisheries Technical Paper No. 475, ‘Global Study of Shrimp Fisheries’ (2008)

,United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, FAO Fisheries Technical paper No. 495, ‘The State of World Highly Migratory, Straddling and Other High Seas Fishery Resources and Associated Species’ (2006)

,United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, Guidelines for the Eco-labelling of Fish and Fish Products (2005)

,United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, Strategy for Improving Information on Status and Trends of Capture Fisheries (Strategy–STF) 2003, approved by consensus at COFI: see FAO, Fisheries Report No. 702 (2003)

,United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, The States of World Fisheries and Aquaculture (2002)

,United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture (2004)

,United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture (2006)

,United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture (2008)

,International Law Commission, Report of the Study Group, Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties arising from the Diversification and Expansion of International Law: Conclusions (A/CN.4/L.702) (18 July 2006)

,International Law Commission, Report of the Study Group, Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties arising from the Diversification and Expansion of International Law: Analytical Study finalised by the Chairman (A/CN.4/L.682 and Corr.1) (13 April 2006)

,International Union for Conservation of Nature, Workshop in High Seas Governance for the 21st Century, Co-Chairs Summary Report, December 2007 (2008)

,Nuclear Supplier Group (NSG) Guidelines for Transfers of Nuclear-Related Dual-Use Equipment, Materials, Software and Related Technology (INFCIRC/254, Part 2)

,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Subsidies: A Way Towards Sustainable Fisheries? Policy Brief (December 2005)

,UNCTAD Doc, Eleventh Session, Sao Paulo, 13–18 June 2004, TD/410 (24 June 2004) ‘Sao Paulo Consensus’

,UN Doc A/55/274, ‘Report of the Work of the United Nations Open-ended Informal Consultative Process on Oceans and the Law of the Sea at its First Meeting’ (31 July 2000)

,UN Doc A/57/80, ‘Report of the Work of the United Nations Open-ended Informal Consultative Process on Oceans and the Law of the Sea at its Third Meeting’ (2 July 2002)

,UN Doc A/58/95, ‘Report of the Work of the United Nations Open-ended Informal Consultative Process on Oceans and the Law of the Sea’ (26 July 2003)

,UN Doc A/59/122, ‘Report of the work of the United Nations Open-ended Informal Consultative Process on Oceans and the Law of the Sea at its fifth meeting’ (1 July 2004)

,UN Doc A/60/99, ‘Report of the Work of the United Nations Open-ended Informal Consultative Process on Oceans and the Law of the Sea at its Sixth Meeting’ (7 July 2005)

,UN Doc A/61/156, ‘Report of the Work of the United Nations Open-ended Informal Consultative Process on Oceans and the Law of the Sea at its Seventh Meeting’ (17 July 2006)

,UN Doc A/62/169, ‘Report of the Work of the United Nations Open-ended Informal Consultative Process on Oceans and the Law of the Sea at its Eighth Meeting’ (30 July 2007)

,UN Doc A/63/174, ‘Report of the Work of the United Nations Open-ended Informal Consultative Process on Oceans and the Law of the Sea at its Ninth Meeting’ (25 July 2008)

,UN Doc A/64/131, ‘Report of the Work of the United Nations Open-ended Informal Consultative Process on Oceans and the Law of the Sea at its Tenth Meeting’ (13 July 2009)

,UN Doc UNEP/CBD/ExCOP/1/2, Final Report of the 6th Ordinary Meeting of the Open-Ended Ad Hoc Working Group on Biosafety, Cartagena, Colombia (15 February 1999)

,United Nations Department of Public Information, ‘Special Session of the General Assembly to Review and Appraise the Implementation of Agenda 21’ (23–27 June 1997) www.un.org/ecosocdev/geninfo/sustdev/fishery.htm

,World Health Organization, Report of the Committee of Experts on Tobacco Industry Documents, Tobacco Company Strategies to Undermine Tobacco Control Activities at the World Health Organization (July 2000)

,World Bank and the FAO, The Sunken Billions: The Economic Justifications for Fisheries Reform (2008)

,World Trade Organization, Consultative Board, The Future of the WTO: Addressing Institutional Challenges in the New Millennium (WTO, 2004) (Report to the Director-General of the WTO by Peter Sutherland, Jagdish Bhagwati, Kwesi Botchwey, Niall FitzGerald, Koichi Hamada, John Jackson, Celso Lafer and Thierry de Montbrial)

,WTO Doc. G/SPS/R/47 ‘Information Management System’ – Note by the Secretariat, ‘Workshop on Transparency 15–16 October 2007’ (8 January 2008)

,WTO Doc. G/TBT/1/Rev. 8, ‘Decision of the Committee on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations with relation to Articles 2, 5 and Annex 3 of the Agreement’ (23 May 2002)

,WTO Doc. G/TBT/M/43, ‘Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade – Minutes of the Meeting of 9 November 2007 – Note by the Secretariat’ (21 January 2008)

,WTO Doc. TN/DS/20 ‘Report by the Chairman, Ambassador Ronald Saborío Soto, to the Trade Negotiations Committee’ (26 July 2007)

,WTO Doc. TN/DS/W/38 ‘Communication from the European Communities Dispute Settlement Body Special Session’ (23 January 2003)

,WTO Doc. TN/MA/W/35, Negotiating Group on Market Access, ‘Draft Elements of Modalities for Negotiations on Non-Agricultural Products’ (16 May 2003)

,WTO Doc. TN/RL/1 ‘Negotiating Group on Rules – Meeting Held on 11 March 2002 – Report by the Chairman to the Trade Negotiating Committee’ (11 April 2002)

,WTO Doc. TN/RL/GEN/36 ‘Fisheries Subsidies to Management Services’ (New Zealand) (22 March 2005)

,WTO Doc. TN/RL/GEN/41 ‘Communication from United States to the Rules Group’ (13 May 2005)

,WTO Doc. TN/RL/GEN/57/Rev.2 ‘WTO Fisheries Subsidies Disciplines: Architecture on Fisheries Subsidies Disciplines’ (Antigua and Barbuda, Barbados, Dominican Republic, Fiji, Grenada, Guyana, Jamaica, Papua New Guinea, St Kitts and Nevis, St Lucia, Solomon Islands and Trinidad and Tobago) (13 September 2005)

,WTO Doc. TN/RL/GEN/79 ‘Negotiating Group on Rules – Further Contribution to the Discussion on the Framework for Disciplines on Fisheries Subsidies – Paper from Brazil’ (16 November 2005); see also TN/RL/GEN/79R3 (2 June 2006)

,WTO Doc. TN/RL/GEN/92 ‘Negotiating Group on Rules – Fisheries Subsidies: Small-Scale Fisheries – Paper from the Republic of Korea’ (18 November 2005)

,WTO Doc. TN/RL/GEN/114 ‘Fisheries Subsidies: Framework for Disciplines’ (Japan, Korea, Separate Customs Territory of Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu) (21 April 2006); see also WTO Doc. TN/RL/GEN/114R1 (2 June 2006)

,WTO Doc. TN/RL/GEN/134 ‘Negotiating Group on Rules – Fisheries Subsidies – Submission of the European Communities’ (24 April 2006)

,WTO Doc. TN/RL/GEN/138 ‘Negotiating Group on Rules – Fisheries Subsidies: Special and Differential Treatment – Paper from Argentina’ (1 June 2006); Rev1 (26 January 2007)

,WTO Doc. TN/RL/GEN/145 ‘Negotiating Group on Rules – Fisheries Subsidies: Proposed New Disciplines – Proposal from the United States’ (22 March 2007)

,WTO Doc. TN/RL/M/1 ‘Note by the Secretariat, Summary Report of the Meeting Held on 11 March 2002’ (8 April 2002)

,WTO Doc. TN/RL/M/2 ‘Note by the Secretariat, Summary Report of the Meeting held on 6 and 8 May 2002’ (11 June 2002)

,WTO Doc. TN/RL/M/7 ‘Note by the Secretariat, Summary Report of the Meeting held on 19–21 March 2003’ (11 April 2003)

,WTO Doc. TN/RL/M/8 ‘Summary Report of the Meeting held on 5–7 May 2003’ (8 June 2003)

,WTO Doc. TN/RL/M/10 ‘Note by the Secretariat, Summary Report of the Meeting Held on 18–19 June 1003’ (17 June 2003)

,WTO Doc. TN/RL/M/17 ‘Note by the Secretariat, Summary Report of the Meeting held on 7 & 8 June 2004’ (31 August 2004)

,WTO Doc. TN/RL/M/18 ‘Note by the Secretariat, Summary Report of the Meeting held on 28 September 2004’ (15 October 2004)

,WTO Doc. TN/RL/W/3 ‘Submission from Australia, Chile, Ecuador, Iceland, New Zealand, Peru, Philippines and the United States: The Doha Mandate to Address Fisheries Subsidies: Issues’ (24 April 2002)

,WTO Doc. TN/RL/W/11 ‘Negotiating Group on Rules – Japan's Basic Position on the Fisheries Subsidies Issue’ (2 July 2007)

,WTO Doc. TN/RL/W12 ‘Submission from New Zealand: Fisheries Subsidies: Limitations of Existing Subsidy Disciplines’ (4 July 2002)

,WTO Doc. TN/RL/W/17 ‘Negotiating Group on Rules – Korea's Views on the Doha Development Agenda Discussions on Fisheries Subsidies’ (2 October 2002)

,WTO Doc. TN/RL/W/21 ‘Negotiating Group on Rules – Adverse Trade and Conservation Effects of Fisheries Subsidies – Communication from the United States’ (15 October 2002)

,WTO Doc. TN/RL/W/52 ‘Negotiating Group on Rules – Japan's Contribution to Discussion on Fisheries Subsidies Issue’ (6 February 2003)

,WTO Doc. TN/RL/W/58 ‘Negotiating Group on Rules – Subsidies in the Fisheries Sector: Possible Categorizations – Submission from Argentina, Chile, Iceland, New Zealand, Norway, and Peru’ (10 February 2003)

,WTO Doc. TN/RL/W/77 ‘Communication from the United States, Possible Approaches to Improved Disciplines on Fisheries Subsidies’ (19 March 2003)

,WTO Doc. TN/RL/W/69 ‘Negotiating Group on Rules – Korea's Views on the Suggested Categorization of Fishery Subsidies’ (18 March 2003)

,WTO Doc. TN/RL/W/97 (Negotiating Group on Rules – Korea's Comments on the Submission from the United States (TN/RL/W/77) – Submission from Korea' (5 May 2003)

,WTO Doc. TN/RL/W/115 ‘Possible Approaches to Improved Disciplines on Fisheries Subsidies – Communication from Chile’ (10 June 2003)

,WTO Doc. TN/RL/W/136 ‘Fisheries Subsidies’ (Antigua and Barbuda, Belize, Fiji Islands, Guyana, the Maldives, Papua New Guinea, Solomon Islands, St Kitts and Nevis) (14 July 2003)

,WTO Doc. TN/RL/W/154 ‘Communication from New Zealand, Fisheries Subsidies: Overcapacity and Overexploitation’ (26 April 2004)

,WTO Doc. TN/RL/W/159 ‘Fisheries Subsidies: Proposed Structure of the Discussion’ (Japan) (7 June 2004)

,WTO Doc. TN/RL/W/160 ‘Negotiating Group on Rules – Questions and Comments from Korea on New Zealand's Communication on Fisheries Subsidies (TN/RL/W/154)’ (Korea) (8 June 2004)

,WTO Doc. TN/RL/W/164 ‘Paper by Japan’ (27 September 2004)

,WTO Doc. TN/RL/W/166 ‘Communication from Argentina, Chile, Ecuador, New Zealand, Philippines, Peru, Fisheries Subsidies’ (2 November 2004)

,WTO Doc. TN/RL/W/169 ‘Negotiating Group on Rules – Additional Views on the Structure of the Fisheries Subsidies Negotiation – Communication from the United States’ (13 December 2004), TN/RL/W/196 (22 November 2005)

,WTO Doc. TN/RL/W/172 ‘Contribution to the Discussion of the Framework for the Disciplines of the Fisheries Subsidies’ (Japan, Korea, the Separate Customs Territory of Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu) (22 February 2005)

,WTO Doc. TN/RL/W/197 ‘Note by the Secretariat, Definitions Related to Artisanal, Small-scale and Subsistence Fishing’ (24 November 2005)

,WTO Doc. TN/RL/W/195 ‘Note from the Chairman’ (22 November 2005)

,WTO Doc. TN/RL/W/207 ‘Negotiating Group on Rules – Promoting Development and Sustainability in Fisheries Subsidies Disciplines: an Informal Dialogue on Select Technical Issues – Communication from New Zealand’ (2 April 2007)

,WTO Doc. TN/RL/W/213 ‘Draft Consolidated Chair Texts of the AD and SCM Agreements’ (30 November 2007)

,WTO Doc. TN/RL/W/232 ‘Working Document from the Chairman’ (Annex C – Fisheries Subsidies) (28 May 2008)

,WTO Doc. TN/RL/W/236 ‘New Draft Consolidated Chair Texts of the AD and SCM Agreements’ (19 December 2008)

,WTO Doc. TN/TE/INF/9/Rev.1 ‘Statement by the Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) at the Committee on Trade and Environment Special Session of 12–13 October 2004 – Paragraph 31 (i)’ (13 October 2004)

,WTO Doc. TN/TE/R/4 ‘Committee on Trade and Environment – Special Session – Summary Report on the MEA Information Session on Paragraph 31(ii) of the Doha Declaration – 12 November 2002 – Note by the Secretariat’ (21 January 2003)

,WTO Doc. TN/TE/R/5 ‘Committee on Trade and Environment – Special Session – Summary Report on the Fifth Meeting of the Committee on Trade and Environment in Special Session – 12–13 February 2003 – Note by the Secretariat’ (14 April 2003)

,WTO Doc. TN/TE/S/2/Rev.2 ‘Note by the Secretariat: Existing Forms of Cooperation and Information Exchange between UNEP/MEAs and the WTO’ (16 January 2007)

,WTO Doc. TN/TE/W/28 ‘Committee on Trade and Environment – Special Session – Paragraph 31(i) of the Doha Declaration – Specific Trade Obligations set out in MEAs – Implementation of CITES in Hong Kong, China (30 April 2003)

,WTO Doc. TN/TE/W/39 ‘The Relationship between WTO Rules and MEAS in the Context of the Global Governance System – Submission by the EC’ (24 March 2004)

,WTO Doc. TN/TE/W/40 ‘Committee on Trade and Environment – Special Session – Sub-Paragraph 31(i) of the Doha Declaration – Submission by the United States’ (21 June 2004)

,WTO Doc. TN/TE/W/45 ‘Committee on Trade and Environment – Special Session – Paragraph 31(i) of the Doha Declaration – Australia's Experience – Submission by Australia’ (12 October 2004)

,WTO Doc. TN/TE/W/53 ‘Committee on Trade and Environment – Special Session – Putting MEA/WTO Governance into Practice: The EC's Experience in the Negotiation and Implementation of MEAs’ (4 July 2003)

,WTO Doc. TN/TE/W/58 ‘Committee on Trade and Environment – Special Session – The Relationship between Existing WTO Rules and Specific Trade Obligations (STOs) Set Out in MEAs – A Swiss Perspective on National Experiences and Criteria used in the Negotiation and Implementation of MEAs Switzerland’ (6 July 2005)

,WTO Doc. TN/TE/W/68 ‘Committee on Trade and Environment – Special Session – Proposal for a Decision of the Ministerial Conference on Trade and Environment – Submission by the EC’ (30 June 2006)

,WTO Doc. TN/TE/W/72/Rev.1 ‘Committee on Trade and Environment – Special Session – Proposal for an Outcome on Trade and Environment Concerning Paragraph 31(i) of the Doha Ministerial Declaration – Submission from Australia and Argentina – Revision’ (7 May 2007)

,WTO Doc. WT/CTE/GEN/5 ‘Regular Session of the CTE of 8 October 2002 – Statement from the Secretariat of the CITES’ (20 November 2002)

,WTO Doc. WT/CTE/GEN/6 ‘Economic Incentives and Trade Policy – Communication from the Secretariat of the CITES’ (20 November 2002)

,WTO Doc. WT/CTE/GEN/7 ‘Decision on Economic Incentives and Trade Policy – Communication from the Secretariat of the CITES’ (11 February 2003)

,WTO Doc. WT/CTE/GEN/10 ‘Environment-related issues in the Negotiations on WTO Rules – Statement by Mr. Jan Woznowski at the Regular Session of the Committee on Trade and Environment of 29–30 April 2003’ (11 April 2003)

,WTO Doc. WT/CTE/INF/6/Rev.4 ‘Committee on Trade and Environment – International Intergovernmental Organizations – Observer Status in the Committee on Trade and Environment – Revision’ (2 February 2007)

,WTO Doc. WT/CTE/M/30 Note by the Secretariat (11 September 2002)

,WTO Doc. WT/CTE/W/1 ‘Environmental Benefits of Removing Trade Restrictions and Distortions – Note by the Secretariat’ (16 February 1995)

,WTO Doc. WT/CTE/W/15 and Corr.1, Note by the Secretariat, ‘Recent Developments in the FAO Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries’ (1 December 1995)

,WTO Doc. WT/CTE/W/62 ‘The 1994 Agreement Relating to the Implementation of Part XI of the 1982 UN Convention on the Law of the Sea – Communication from the UN Division for Ocean Affairs and the Law of the Sea’ (16 September 1997)

,WTO Doc. WT/CTE/W/126 ‘Committee on Trade and Environment – The FAO International Plan of Action for the Management of Fishing Capacity and Related Initiatives for Sustainable Fisheries’ (Communication from the FAO) (12 October 1999)

,WTO Doc. WT/CTE/W/135 ‘CTE – Update of FAO Activities Related to Fisheries – Communication from the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO)’ (29 Feb 2000)

,WTO Doc. WT/CTE/W/160/Rev.4 ‘Matrix on Trade Measures Pursuant to Selected Multilateral Environmental Agreements’ (2005)

,WTO Doc. WT/CTE/W/165 ‘The Relationship between the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora and the WTO – Communication from the Secretariat of the CITES’ (13 October 2000)

,WTO Doc. WT/CTE/W/167/Add.1 ‘Committee on Trade and Environment – Environmental Benefits of Removing Trade Restrictions and Distortions: The Fisheries Sector – Item 6 of the Work Program by the Secretariat – Addendum’ (19 June 2001)

,WTO Doc. WT/CTE/W/189 ‘Committee on Trade and Environment – Update of FAO Activities Related to Fisheries – Report of the Expert Consultation on Economic Incentives and Responsible Fisheries – Communication from the FAO’ (18 June 2001)

,WTO Doc. WT/CTE/W/205 ‘UNEP Workshop on the Impact of Trade-Related Policies on Fisheries and Measures Required for their Sustainable Management’ (8 May 2002)

,WTO Doc. WT/CTE/W/235 ‘Decisions of the Seventh Meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity and the First Meeting of the Parties to the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety of Relevance to the WTO – Note by the Executive Secretary of the CBD’ (8 June 2004)

,WTO Doc. WT/CTE/W/216 ‘Committee on Trade and Environment – Technical Assistance and Capacity Building Activities in 2002 – Note by the Secretariat – Paragraph 33’ (30 September 2002)

,WTO Doc. WT/DSB/19 ‘Indicative List of Governmental and Non-Governmental Panelists’ 29 March 2000

,WTO Doc. WT/DS58/9 ‘United States – Import Prohibition of Certain Shrimp and Shrimp Products – Constitution of the Panel Established at the Requests of Malaysia, Thailand, Pakistan and India – Note by the Secretariat’ (17 April 1997)

,WTO Doc. WT/GC/M/60 ‘Minutes of the General Council Meeting of 22 November 2000’ (23 January 2001)

,World Trade Organization, World Trade Report (WTO, 2006)Google Scholar

www.acwl.ch

www.ccamlr.org

www.ciel.org

www.cites.org

www.defenders.org/index.php

www.fao.org

www.fishsubsidy.org

www.globalsubsidies.org

www.hsus.org

www.iarc.fr

www.icc-cpi.int

www.icsid.worldbank.org

www.ictsd.org

www.ifaw.org

www.isealalliance.org

www.iucn.org

www.iwmc.org/iwmcinfo/statement.htm

www.msc.org

www.oceana.org

www.oceansatlas.org/www.un-oceans.org/Index.htm

www.trade-environment.org/page/southernagenda/description.htm

www.un.org/Depts/los/doalos_activities/about_doalos.htm

www.unep.org

www.wto.org