Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T08:09:07.193Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 8 - From Diotima to Thecla and Beyond

Virginal Voice in the Lives of Helia and Constantina

from Part II - An Act to Surpass

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 May 2022

Ghazzal Dabiri
Affiliation:
University of Maryland, College Park
Flavia Ruani
Affiliation:
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Paris
Get access

Summary

How is it that female figures—though whether they are properly female is debatable—come to voice in Christian texts of late antiquity? How, in particular, do their voices enter into debates about desire, traditionally the province of masculine speech? And what do these virginal voices sound like? Are they distinct and recognizable to our reading ears? There is a story to be told, and it starts with Thecla. We might say that every Christian virgin who arrogates voice in some sense follows Thecla, speaking her desire in speech that both is and is not her own. Thecla, in other words, both inaugurates and serves as a figure for virginal voice in its startling, in-breaking forcefulness. But Thecla, however definitively novel, follows others as well. This chapter first backtracks to consider Thecla’s precursors, Diotima (Plato, Symposium) and Leucippe (Achilles Tatius, Leucippe and Clitophon). It then follows the reworking of those figures in the Acts of Thecla and Methodius’ Symposium respectively. Finally, it explores the legacy of Thecla in two little-known late ancient Latin dialogues that feature notably voluble virgins—the Lives of Saints Helia and Constantina, respectively.

Type
Chapter
Information
Thecla and Medieval Sainthood
<I>The Acts of Paul and Thecla</I> in Eastern and Western Hagiography
, pp. 233 - 255
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aspegren, Kerstin. The Male Woman: A Feminine Ideal in the Early Church. Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis/Uppsala Women’s Studies 4. Uppsala; Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell International, 1990.Google Scholar
Barrier, Jeremy W. The Acts of Paul and Thecla: A Critical Introduction and Commentary. WUNT 2.270. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloodsworth-Lugo, Mary K. In-Between Bodies: Sexual Difference, Race, and Sexuality. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Boyarin, Daniel. Socrates and the Fat Rabbis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Bril, Alexander. “Plato and the Sympotic Form in the Symposium of St. Methodius of Olympus.” Zeitschrift für Antike und Christentum 9 (2006): 279302.Google Scholar
Burrus, Virginia. “Mimicking Virgins: Colonial Ambivalence and the Ancient Romance.” Arethusa 38, no. 1 (2005): 4988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burrus, Virginia, and Conti, Marco, eds. and trans. The Life of Saint Helia: Edition, Translation, Introduction, and Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Butler, Shane. The Ancient Phonograph. Brooklyn: Zone Books, 2015.Google Scholar
Carson, Anne. “The Gender of Sound.” In Glass, Irony, and God. New York: New Directions, 1995: 119142.Google Scholar
Conti, Marco, Burrus, Virginia, and Trout, Dennis, eds. and trans. The Lives of Constantina. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020.Google Scholar
Gaselee, Stephen, trans. Achilles Tatius: Leucippe and Clitophon. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Gleason, Maud W. Making Men: Sophists and Self-Presentation in Ancient Rome. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Halperin, David M.Why Is Diotima a Woman? Platonic Ερως and the Figuration of Gender.” In Before Sexuality: The Construction of Erotic Experience in the Ancient Greek World, edited by Halperin, David, Winkler, Jack, and Zeitlin, Froma. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990: 257308.Google Scholar
Henrichs, Albert. “Missing Pages: Papyrology, Genre, and the Greek novel.” In Culture in Pieces: Essays on Ancient Texts in Honour of Peter Parsons, edited by Obbink, Dirk and Rutherford, Richard. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011: 302322.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. An Ethics of Sexual Difference. Translated by Burke, Carolyn and Gill, Gillian C.. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Jarratt, Susan. Rereading the Sophists: Classical Rhetoric Refigured. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Jarratt, Susan, and Ong, Rory. “Aspasia: Rhetoric, Gender, and Colonial Ideology.” In Reclaiming Rhetorica: Women in the Rhetorical Tradition, edited by Lunsford, Andrea A.. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1995: 924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
König, Jason. “Sympotic Dialogue in the First to Fifth Centuries C.E.” In The End of Dialogue in Antiquity, edited by Goldhill, Simon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008: 85113.Google Scholar
Lamb, Walter R. M., ed. and trans. Plato: Lysis, Symposium, Gorgias. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1925.Google Scholar
Morales, Helen. “Introduction.” In Achilles Tatius: Leucippe and Clitophon, translated by Whitmarsh, Tim. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001: viixxxv.Google Scholar
Musurillo, Herbert, trans. St. Methodius: The Symposium: A Treatise on Chastity. Ancient Christian Writers 27. London: Longmans, Green and Co., 1958.Google Scholar
Musurillo, Herbert, and Debidour, Victor-Henry, eds. Méthode d’Olympe: Le Banquet. Sources Chrétiennes 95. Paris: Les Éditions du Cerf, 1963.Google Scholar
Norman, Ralph. “Methodius and Methodologies: Ways of Reading Third-Century Christian Sexual Symbolism.” Theology and Sexuality 13, no. 1 (2006): 79100.Google Scholar
Salisbury, Joyce. Church Fathers, Independent Virgins. London: Verso, 1991.Google Scholar
Swearingen, C. Jan. “A Lover’s Discourse: Diotima, Logos, and Desire.” In Reclaiming Rhetorica: Women in the Rhetorical Tradition, edited by Lunsford, Andrea A.. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1995: 2551.Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, Tim, trans. Achilles Tatius: Clitophon and Leucippe. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×