Book contents
- Textbook of Stroke Medicine
- Textbook of Stroke Medicine
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Section 1 Etiology, Pathophysiology, and Imaging
- Section 2 Clinical Epidemiology and Risk Factors
- Section 3 Diagnostics and Syndromes
- Section 4 Therapeutic Strategies and Neurorehabilitation
- Chapter 18 Stroke Units and Clinical Assessment
- Chapter 19 Acute Therapies for Stroke
- Chapter 20 Image-Guided, Interventional Therapy of Acute Stroke
- Chapter 21 Intensive Care of Stroke
- Chapter 22 Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke and its Late Complications
- Chapter 23 Infections in Stroke
- Chapter 24 Secondary Prevention
- Chapter 25 Neurorehabilitation Practice for Stroke Patients
- Index
- References
Chapter 18 - Stroke Units and Clinical Assessment
from Section 4 - Therapeutic Strategies and Neurorehabilitation
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 May 2019
Book contents
- Textbook of Stroke Medicine
- Textbook of Stroke Medicine
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Section 1 Etiology, Pathophysiology, and Imaging
- Section 2 Clinical Epidemiology and Risk Factors
- Section 3 Diagnostics and Syndromes
- Section 4 Therapeutic Strategies and Neurorehabilitation
- Chapter 18 Stroke Units and Clinical Assessment
- Chapter 19 Acute Therapies for Stroke
- Chapter 20 Image-Guided, Interventional Therapy of Acute Stroke
- Chapter 21 Intensive Care of Stroke
- Chapter 22 Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke and its Late Complications
- Chapter 23 Infections in Stroke
- Chapter 24 Secondary Prevention
- Chapter 25 Neurorehabilitation Practice for Stroke Patients
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Textbook of Stroke Medicine , pp. 307 - 314Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Stroke Unit Trialists’ Collaboration. Organised inpatient (stroke unit) care for stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; 4: CD000197.Google Scholar
Kjellström, T, Norrving, B, Shatchkute, A. Helsingborg Declaration 2006 on European stroke strategies. Cerebrovasc Dis 2007; 23: 231–41.Google Scholar
Terént, A, Asplund, K, Farahmand, B, et al. Stroke unit care revisited: who benefits the most? A cohort study of 105,043 patients in Riks-Stroke, the Swedish Stroke Register. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2009; 80: 881–7.Google Scholar
Ringelstein, EB, Chamorro, A, Kaste, M, et al. European Stroke Organisation recommendations to establish a stroke unit and stroke center. Stroke 2013; 44: 828–40.Google Scholar
European Stroke Organisation (ESO) Executive Committee, ESO Writing Committee. Guidelines for management of ischaemic stroke and transient ischaemic attack 2008. Cerebrovasc Dis 2008; 25: 457–507.Google Scholar
Berglund, A, Svensson, L, Sjöstrand, C, et al. Higher prehospital priority level of stroke improves thrombolysis frequency and time to stroke unit: the Hyper Acute STroke Alarm (HASTA) study. Stroke 2012; 43: 2666–70.Google Scholar
Baldereschi, M, Piccardi, B, Di Carlo, A, et al. Relevance of prehospital stroke code activation for acute treatment measures in stroke care: a review. Cerebrovasc Dis 2012; 34: 182–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
El Khoury, R, Jung, R, Nanda, A, et al. Overview of key factors in improving access to acute stroke care. Neurology 2012; 79: S26–34.Google Scholar
Meretoja, A, Kaste, M. Pre- and in-hospital intersection of stroke care. Ann NY Acad Sci 2012; 1268: 145–51.Google Scholar
Kothari, R, Barsan, W, Brott, T, Broderick, J, Ashbrock, S. Frequency and accuracy of prehospital diagnosis of acute stroke. Stroke 1995; 26: 937–41.Google Scholar
Kothari, RU, Pancioli, A, Liu, T, Brott, T, Broderick, J. Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale: reproducibility and validity. Ann Emerg Med 1999; 33: 373–8.Google Scholar
Nor, AM, McAllister, C, Louw, SJ, et al. Agreement between ambulance paramedic- and physician-recorded neurological signs with Face Arm Speech Test (FAST) in acute stroke patients. Stroke 2004; 35: 1355–9.Google Scholar
Kidwell, CS, Starkman, S, Eckstein, M, Weems, K, Saver, JL. Identifying stroke in the field. Prospective validation of the Los Angeles prehospital stroke screen (LAPSS). Stroke 2000; 31: 71–6.Google Scholar
Bray, JE, Martin, J, Cooper, G, et al. Paramedic identification of stroke: community validation of the Melbourne ambulance stroke screen. Cerebrovasc Dis 2005; 20: 28–33.Google Scholar
McTaggart, RA, Yaghi, S, Cutting, SM, et al. Association of a primary stroke center protocol for suspected stroke by large-vessel occlusion with efficiency of care and patient outcomes. JAMA Neurol 2017; 74: 793–800.Google Scholar
Lindsberg, PJ, Häppölä, O, Kallela, M, et al. Door to thrombolysis: ER reorganization and reduced delays to acute stroke treatment. Neurology 2006; 67: 334–6.Google Scholar
Meretoja, A, Strbian, D, Mustanoja, S, et al. Reducing in-hospital delay to 20 minutes in stroke thrombolysis. Neurology 2012; 79: 306–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Audebert, HJ, Schenkel, J, Heuschmann, PU, et al. Effects of the implementation of a telemedical stroke network: the Telemedic Pilot Project for Integrative Stroke Care (TEMPiS) in Bavaria, Germany. Lancet Neurol 2006; 5: 742–8.Google Scholar
Hess, DC, Wang, S, Gross, H, et al. Telestroke: extending stroke expertise into underserved areas. Lancet Neurol 2006; 5: 275–8.Google Scholar
Zaidi, SF, Jumma, MA, Urra, XN, et al. Telestroke-guided intravenous tissue-type plasminogen activator treatment achieves a similar clinical outcome as thrombolysis at a comprehensive stroke center. Stroke 2011; 42: 3291–3.Google Scholar
Weber, JE, Ebinger, M, Rozanski, M, et al. Prehospital thrombolysis in acute stroke: results of the PHANTOM-S pilot study. Neurology 2013; 80: 163–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kunz, A, Ebinger, M, Geisler, F, et al. Functional outcomes of pre-hospital thrombolysis in a mobile stroke treatment unit compared with conventional care: an observational registry study. Lancet Neurol 2016; 15: 1035–43.Google Scholar
Leys, D, Ringelstein, EB, Kaste, M, Hacke, W, Executive Committee of the European Stroke Initiative. Facilities available in European hospitals treating stroke patients. Stroke 2007; 38: 2985–91.Google Scholar
European Stroke Initiative Writing Committee, Writing Committee for the EUSI Executive Committee, Steiner, T, et al. Recommendations for the management of intracranial haemorrhage – part I: spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage. Cerebrovasc Dis 2006; 22: 294–316.Google Scholar
Langhorne, P, Dennis, M. Stroke Units: An Evidence Based Approach. London: BMJ Books; 1999.Google Scholar
Urimubenshi, G, Langhorne, P, Cadilhac, DA, Kagwiza, JN, Wu, O. Association between patient outcomes and key performance indicators of stroke care quality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Stroke J 2017; 2: 287–307.Google Scholar
Aboderin, I, Venables, G. Stroke management in Europe. Pan European Consensus Meeting on Stroke Management. J Intern Med 1996; 240: 173–80.Google Scholar
Walter, S, Kostopoulos, P, Haass, A, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of patients with stroke in a mobile stroke unit versus in hospital: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Neurol 2012; 11: 397–404.Google Scholar
De Castro, S, Papetti, F, Di Angelantonio, E, et al. Feasibility and clinical utility of transesophageal echocardiography in the acute phase of cerebral ischemia. Am J Cardiol 2010; 106: 1339–44.Google Scholar
Vahedi, K, Hofmeijer, J, Juettler, E, et al. Early decompressive surgery in malignant infarction of the middle cerebral artery: a pooled analysis of three randomised controlled trials. Lancet Neurol 2007; 6: 215–22.Google Scholar