Book contents
- Technologies of the Novel
- Technologies of the Novel
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Epigraph
- Contents
- Figures
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Part I
- Part II
- 3 Novel v. Romance I
- 4 Novel v. Romance II
- 5 Novel v. Romance III
- 6 Documenticity I
- 7 Documenticity II
- 8 A “New” Third-person Novel
- 9 The Novel System in England, 1701–1810
- Part III
- Annex Premises and Protocols
- A Glossary of Novel Types
- Notes
- Bibliography
- Index
3 - Novel v. Romance I
Heliodorian Insetting
from Part II
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 November 2020
- Technologies of the Novel
- Technologies of the Novel
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Epigraph
- Contents
- Figures
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Part I
- Part II
- 3 Novel v. Romance I
- 4 Novel v. Romance II
- 5 Novel v. Romance III
- 6 Documenticity I
- 7 Documenticity II
- 8 A “New” Third-person Novel
- 9 The Novel System in England, 1701–1810
- Part III
- Annex Premises and Protocols
- A Glossary of Novel Types
- Notes
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
This chapter is the first of three that attempt to empirically measure the commonly attested rupture between the roman and the nouvelle around the year 1660. (This rupture is a version of the frequent opposition in English literary history between romance and novel.) According to Du Plaisir’s 1683 Sentiments sur les lettres, the use of inset narratives would appear to be a defining formal characteristic of the roman. After exploring the haphazard spread of this device from the French translation of Heliodorus’s Aethiopica in the 1540s to the opening of the seventeenth century, the chapter details the rise and fall of various sorts of insetting up to 1750.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Technologies of the NovelQuantitative Data and the Evolution of Literary Systems, pp. 63 - 78Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020