Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- I An Introduction to Teaching Mathematics with Classroom Voting
- II Studies of Classroom Voting in Mathematics
- III Classroom Voting in Specific Mathematics Classes
- 6 Questions to Engage Students in Discussion (Q.E.D): Using Clickers in a Mathematics for Liberal Arts Course
- 7 Clickers in Introductory Statistics Courses
- 8 Using Clickers in a Statistics Classroom
- 9 Engaging Statistics Students with Classroom Response Systems
- 10 Incorporating Clicker Technology in the Introductory Statistics Course
- 11 Using Clickers in Courses for Future K–8 Teachers
- 12 Using Clickers in Professional DevelopmentWorkshops
- 13 Using ConcepTests in College Algebra
- 14 An Example of Multi-Purpose Use of Clickers in College Algebra
- 15 ConcepTests—Classroom Voting: A Catalyst for an Interactive College Algebra ClassroomD
- 16 Using Clickers to Encourage Communication and Self-Reflection in Precalculus
- 17 Writing and Adapting Classroom Voting Questions: New Functions from Old
- 18 Enhancing Student Participation and Attitudes in a Large-Lecture Calculus Course
- 19 Good Questions for Mathematics Eduction: An Example from Multivariable Calculus
- 20 Integrating Classroom Voting Into Your Lectures: Some Thoughts and Examples from a Differential Equations Course
- 21 Classroom Voting Questions that Provoke Teachable Moments in Differential Equations
- 22 Teaching Linear Algebra with Classroom Voting: A Class Period on Linear Independence
- 23 Lesson Planning with Classroom Voting: An Example from Linear Algebra
- 24 Using Clickers to Enhance Learning in Upper-Level Mathematics Courses
- Bibliography
- About the Editors
12 - Using Clickers in Professional DevelopmentWorkshops
from III - Classroom Voting in Specific Mathematics Classes
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- I An Introduction to Teaching Mathematics with Classroom Voting
- II Studies of Classroom Voting in Mathematics
- III Classroom Voting in Specific Mathematics Classes
- 6 Questions to Engage Students in Discussion (Q.E.D): Using Clickers in a Mathematics for Liberal Arts Course
- 7 Clickers in Introductory Statistics Courses
- 8 Using Clickers in a Statistics Classroom
- 9 Engaging Statistics Students with Classroom Response Systems
- 10 Incorporating Clicker Technology in the Introductory Statistics Course
- 11 Using Clickers in Courses for Future K–8 Teachers
- 12 Using Clickers in Professional DevelopmentWorkshops
- 13 Using ConcepTests in College Algebra
- 14 An Example of Multi-Purpose Use of Clickers in College Algebra
- 15 ConcepTests—Classroom Voting: A Catalyst for an Interactive College Algebra ClassroomD
- 16 Using Clickers to Encourage Communication and Self-Reflection in Precalculus
- 17 Writing and Adapting Classroom Voting Questions: New Functions from Old
- 18 Enhancing Student Participation and Attitudes in a Large-Lecture Calculus Course
- 19 Good Questions for Mathematics Eduction: An Example from Multivariable Calculus
- 20 Integrating Classroom Voting Into Your Lectures: Some Thoughts and Examples from a Differential Equations Course
- 21 Classroom Voting Questions that Provoke Teachable Moments in Differential Equations
- 22 Teaching Linear Algebra with Classroom Voting: A Class Period on Linear Independence
- 23 Lesson Planning with Classroom Voting: An Example from Linear Algebra
- 24 Using Clickers to Enhance Learning in Upper-Level Mathematics Courses
- Bibliography
- About the Editors
Summary
Introduction
Much of the existing literature on the use of an electronic personal response system is in the context of increasing participation in a lecture setting. In this paper, we give several examples of using an electronic response system, or clickers, during a workshop for the professional development of in-service teachers. Clickers were used in three distinct settings during the workshop: a) to analyze existing mathematical content knowledge, b) to promote awareness of national mathematics testing data, and c) to conclude a mathematical experiment. In each case, the principal goal of the use of this technology was the promotion of productivemathematical discourse. Participant comments and selfevaluation of clicker use indicate that benefits similar to those found in the lecture setting were also realized in this workshop setting.
Background
District teams of teachers in grades 3 to 9 including special education teachers participated in an eight-day summer workshop to enhance their mathematical content knowledge. With the disparate mathematical backgrounds of the 48 teachers, ranging from teachers with one undergraduatemathematics course to those with an undergraduatemathematics degree, it was anticipated that strategies would be needed to promote productive discourse between the workshop leaders and the teachers and among the teachers themselves. For this reason, the use of clickers in the workshop was anonymous, that is, teacher identity was not associated with a clicker identification number. Springer and Dick [78] describe a discourse move in a mathematics classroom as “a deliberate action taken by a teacher to encourage, facilitate, participate in, or influence the discourse.”
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Teaching Mathematics with Classroom VotingWith and Without Clickers, pp. 83 - 86Publisher: Mathematical Association of AmericaPrint publication year: 2011
- 1
- Cited by