Book contents
- Teaching Computational Creativity
- Teaching Computational Creativity
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Notes on Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction: Pedagogies at the Intersection of Disciplines
- PART I NEW FOUNDATIONS
- PART II CODE AS MEDIUM
- PART III PHYSICAL{LY} COMPUTING
- PART IV ONLINE LEARNING
- PART V CRITICAL PEDAGOGY
- PART VI TRANSDISCIPLINARY
- Interviews
- Afterword: Toward a Curricular Synthesis
- Index
- References
Introduction: Pedagogies at the Intersection of Disciplines
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 July 2017
Book contents
- Teaching Computational Creativity
- Teaching Computational Creativity
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Notes on Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction: Pedagogies at the Intersection of Disciplines
- PART I NEW FOUNDATIONS
- PART II CODE AS MEDIUM
- PART III PHYSICAL{LY} COMPUTING
- PART IV ONLINE LEARNING
- PART V CRITICAL PEDAGOGY
- PART VI TRANSDISCIPLINARY
- Interviews
- Afterword: Toward a Curricular Synthesis
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Teaching Computational Creativity , pp. 1 - 18Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Anders, G. (2015, July 29). That “useless” liberal arts degree has become tech's hottest ticket. Forbes. Retrieved from www.forbes.com/sites/georgeanders/2015/07/29/liberal-arts-degree-tech/#3ade8b335a75. Accessed online March 3, 2016.Google Scholar
Arfield, J., Hodgkinson, K., Smith, A., and Wade, W. (2013). Flexible learning in higher education. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, D.M. (2011). The Computational Turn: Thinking about the digital humanities. Culture Machine 12, n.p. Retrieved from www.culturemachine.net/index.php/cm/issue/view/23. Accessed online March 3, 2016.Google Scholar
Bødker, S. (2015) Third-wave HCI, 10 years later – participation and sharing. Interactions 22(5), 24–31. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2804405 Retrieved from http://interactions.acm.org/archive/view/september-october-2015/third-wave-hci-10-years-later-participation-and-sharing. Accessed online March 3, 2016.Google Scholar
Bogost, I. (2007). Persuasive games: The expressive power of videogames. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brockman, J. (1995). Third culture: Beyond the scientific revolution. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Cross, N. (2001). Design cognition: Results from protocol and other empirical studies of design activity. In Eastman, C.M., McCracken, W.M., and Newstetter, W.C. (Eds.), Design knowing and learning: Cognition in design education. Oxford, England: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Ferenstein, G. (2014, March 3). Study: Massive online courses enroll an average of 43,000 students, 10% completion. Techcrunch. Retrieved from http://techcrunch.com/2014/03/03/study-massive-online-courses-enroll-an-average-of-43000-students-10-completion/. Accessed online March 3, 2016.Google Scholar
Ferster, B. (2013). Interactive visualization: Insight through inquiry. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Greenberg, I. (2007). Processing: Creative coding and computational art. Berkeley, CA; New York: Friends of Ed. Distributed to the book trade worldwide by Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Harrison, S., Tatar, D., and Sengers, P. (2007). The three paradigms of HCI. Proceedings of the conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI 2007). San Jose, CA, 1–18.Google Scholar
Keramidas, K. (2012). The DML and the digital humanities. Journal of Interactive Technology & Pedagogy (2). Retrieved from http://jitp.commons.gc.cuny.edu/afterword-the-dml-and-the-digital-humanities/. Accessed online March 3, 2016.Google Scholar
Kurzweil, R. (2011). The law of accelerating returns. Retrieved from http://bigthink.com/in-their-own-words/the-difference-between-linear-and-exponential-thinking. Accessed online March 3, 2016.Google Scholar
Kwastek, K. (2013). Aesthetics of interaction in digital art. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loh, H.L.K., Chai, C.S., Wong, B., and Hong, H.Y. (2015). Design thinking for education: Conceptions and applications in teaching and learning. Singapore: Springer ebook.Google Scholar
McKeough, A., Lupart, J.L., and Marini, A. (Eds.) (2013). Teaching for transfer: Fostering generalization in learning. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, C.H. (2008). Digital storytelling: A creator's guide to interactive entertainment (2nd edn.). Amsterdam; Boston, MA: Focal Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, G. and Lottridge, D. (2010). Interaction design in the university designing disciplinary interactions. Proceedings of the conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI 2010), Atlanta, GA, 2735–43. Retrieved from https://tspace.library.utoronto.ca/bitstream/1807/24390/1/p2735.pdfGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, J. (1995, January 1). 10 Usability heuristics for user interface design. Nielsen Norman Group. Retrieved from www.nngroup.com/articles/ten-usability-heuristics/. Accessed online March 3, 2016.Google Scholar
Noble, J.J. (2012). Programming interactivity (2nd edn.). Beijing; Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly.Google Scholar
Popper, K. Three worlds. The Tanner lecture on human values. Delivered at the University of Michigan April 17, 1978. Retrieved from http://tannerlectures.utah.edu/_documents/a-to-z/p/popper80.pdf. Accessed online March 3, 2016.Google Scholar
Reas, C. and Fry, B. (2007). Processing: A programming handbook for visual designers and artists. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sanchez-Vives, M.V. and Slater, M. (2005). Opinion: From presence to consciousness through virtual reality. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6(4), 332–9. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1651. Accessed online March 3, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schön, D.A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Simon, H. (1996). The sciences of the artificial (3rd edn.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar