Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T14:39:45.492Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 18 - Saving the Whales by Taking on TIVA

The Environmental Impact of TIVA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 November 2019

Michael G. Irwin
Affiliation:
The University of Hong Kong
Gordon T. C. Wong
Affiliation:
The University of Hong Kong
Shuk Wan Lam
Affiliation:
The University of Hong Kong
Get access

Summary

Reducing the energy consumption and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of health services could make a meaningful contribution to the environment. In the United Kingdom, the National Health Service (NHS) was responsible for 21.3 million metric tons of CO2 equivalents (i.e. 426 kg per person), or approximately 3% of all GHG emissions in England in 2004.[1] In the United States, annual health-care sector emissions were 545.5 million metric tons of CO2 equivalent in 2007 (i.e. 1510 kg per person) or approximately 8% of the country’s total GHG emissions for that year.[2] In Australia, total national emissions were 547 million and 553 million metric tons of CO2 equivalents in 2007 and 2008, respectively.[3] Reducing health-related GHG emissions by 10% from the US health system alone, could have the same environmental impact as a 10% reduction in emissions from the whole of the Australian economy.

Type
Chapter
Information
Taking on TIVA
Debunking Myths and Dispelling Misunderstandings
, pp. 146 - 153
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Sustainable Development Commission. NHS England Carbon Emissions Carbon Footprinting Report, 2009.Google Scholar
Chung, J.W., Meltzer, D.O.. Estimate of the carbon footprint of the US health care sector. JAMA 2009; 302: 1970–2.Google Scholar
Brown, L.H., Buettner, P.G., Canyon, D.V.. The energy burden and environmental impact of health services. Am J Public Health 2012; 102: e7682.Google Scholar
Cook, J., Oreskes, N., Doran, P.T., et al. Consensus on consensus: a synthesis of consensus estimates on human-caused global warming. Environ Res Lett 2016; 11: 048002.Google Scholar
Team, C.W.. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. In: Pachauri, R.K. and Reisinger, A., eds. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva: 2007, 104.Google Scholar
Church, J.A., White, N.J.. A 20th century acceleration in global sea-level rise. Geophys Res Lett 2006; 33.Google Scholar
Peterson, T.C., Baringer, M.O.. State of the climate in 2008. Bull Am Meteor Soc 2009; 90: S1S196.Google Scholar
Levitus, S., Antonov, J.I., Boyer, T.P., Locarnini, R.A., Garcia, H.E., Mishonov, A.V.. Global ocean heat content 1955–2008 in light of recently revealed instrumentation problems. Geophys Res Lett 2009; 36: L07608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kwok, R., Rothrock, D.A.. Decline in Arctic sea ice thickness from submarine and ICESat records: 1958–2008. Geophys Res Lett 2009; 36: L15501.Google Scholar
Sabine, C.L., Feely, R.A., Gruber, N., et al. The oceanic sink for anthropogenic CO2. Science 2004; 305: 367–71.Google Scholar
Derksen, C., Brown, R.. Spring snow cover extent reductions in the 2008–2012 period exceeding climate model projections. Geophys Res Lett 2012; 39: L19504.Google Scholar
Rigby, M., Prinn, R.G., O’Doherty, S., et al. Recent and future trends in synthetic greenhouse gas radiative forcing. Geophys Res Lett 2014; 41: 2623–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boden, T.A., Andres, R.J., Marland, G.. Global, regional, and national fossil-fuel CO2 emissions environmental system science data infrastructure for a virtual ecosystem. Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center (CDIAC), Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN, USA, 2009.Google Scholar
Doney, S.C., Ruckelshaus, M., Duffy, J.E., et al. Climate change impacts on marine ecosystems. Ann Rev Mar Sci 2012; 4: 1137.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ishizawa, Y.. Special article: general anesthetic gases and the global environment. Anesth Analg 2011; 112: 213–17.Google Scholar
Ravishankara, A.R., Daniel, J.S., Portmann, R.W.. Nitrous oxide (N2O): the dominant ozone-depleting substance emitted in the 21st century. Science 2009; 326: 123–5.Google Scholar
Kumar, N., Singh, R., Jain, A., Bhattacharya, A.. How green is my operation theater? Saudi J Anaesth 2014; 8: 493–7.Google Scholar
Langbein, T., Sonntag, H., Trapp, D., et al. Volatile anaesthetics and the atmosphere: atmospheric lifetimes and atmospheric effects of halothane, enflurane, isoflurane, desflurane and sevoflurane. Br J Anaesth 1999; 82: 6673.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rowland, F.S.. Chlorofluorocarbons and the depletion of stratospheric ozone. Am Sci 1989; 77: 3645.Google Scholar
Brown, A.C., Canosa-Mas, C.E., Parr, A.D., Pierce, J.M., Wayne, R.P.. Tropospheric lifetimes of halogenated anaesthetics. Nature 1989; 341: 635–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lashof, D.A., Ahuja, D.R.. Relative contributions of greenhouse gas emissions to global warming. Nature 1990; 344: 529.Google Scholar
Campbell, M., Tom Pierce, J.M.. Atmospheric science, anaesthesia, and the environment. BJA Educ 2015; 15: 173–9.Google Scholar
Hodnebrog, Ø., Etminan, M., Fuglestvedt, J.S., et al. Global warming potentials and radiative efficiencies of halocarbons and related compounds: a comprehensive review. Rev Geophys 2013; 51: 300–78.Google Scholar
Ryan, S.M., Nielsen, C.J.. Global warming potential of inhaled anesthetics: application to clinical use. Anesth Analg 2010; 111: 92–8.Google Scholar
Bosello, F., Roson, R., Tol, R.S.J.. Economy-wide estimates of the implications of climate change: Human health. Ecol Econ 2006; 58: 579–91.Google Scholar
Rees, W.E.. Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity: what urban economics leaves out. Environ Urban 1992; 4: 121–30.Google Scholar
Sherman, J., Le, C., Lamers, V., Eckelman, M.. Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of anesthetic drugs. Anesth Analg 2012; 114: 1086–90.Google Scholar
Shiraishi, Y., Ikeda, K.. Uptake and biotransformation of sevoflurane in humans: a comparative study of sevoflurane with halothane, enflurane, and isoflurane. J Clin Anesth 1990; 2: 381–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yasuda, N., Lockhart, S.H., Eger, E.I., 2nd, et al. Kinetics of desflurane, isoflurane, and halothane in humans. Anesthesiology 1991; 74: 489–98.Google Scholar
Yasny, J.S., White, J.. Environmental implications of anesthetic gases. Anesth Prog 2012; 59: 154–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rockstrom, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., et al. A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 2009; 461: 472–5.Google Scholar
Costanza, R., d’Arge, R., de Groot, R., et al. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 1997; 387: 253–60.Google Scholar
Dietz, S., Bowen, A., Dixon, C., Gradwell, P.. ‘Climate value at risk’ of global financial assets. Nat Clim Chang 2016; 6: 676–9.Google Scholar
Mankes, R.F.. Propofol wastage in anesthesia. Anesth Analg 2012; 114: 1091–2.Google Scholar
Gillerman, R.G., Browning, R.A.. Drug use inefficiency: a hidden source of wasted health care dollars. Anesth Analg 2000; 91: 921–4.Google Scholar
Chaudhary, K., Garg, R., Bhalotra, A.R., Anand, R., Girdhar, K.. Anesthetic drug wastage in the operation room: a cause for concern. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2012; 28: 5661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mückter, H.. Intravenous anaesthetics in the environment: an update. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2000; 17: 13.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×