Book contents
References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 June 2023
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Systemic Functional GrammarA Text-Based Description of English, Spanish and Chinese, pp. 439 - 454Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023
References
Abercrombie, D. (1967). Elements of General Phonetics. Chicago: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Akerejola, E. (2005). A systemic functional grammar of Òkó. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Macquarie University, Sydney.Google Scholar
Arús, J. (2010). On theme in English and Spanish: a comparative study. In Swain, E. (ed.), Thresholds and Potentialities of Systemic Functional Linguistics: Multilingual, Multimodal and Other Specialised Discourses (pp. 23–48). Trieste: EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste.Google Scholar
Arús-Hita, J., Teruya, K., Bardi, M. A., Kumar, A. & Mwinlaaru, I. (2018). Quoting and reporting across languages: a system-based and text-based typology. Word, 64(2), 69–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.2018.1463001Google Scholar
Bache, C. (2008). English Tense and aspect in Halliday’s Systemic Functional Grammar: A Critical Appraisal and an Alternative. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Bartlett, T. & O’Grady, G. (eds.) (2017). The Routledge Handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bartoš, L. (1980). La atribución relacional y el adjetivo de relación en el español. Études romanes de Brno, 11, 69–77.Google Scholar
Bateman, J., Matthiessen, C. M. I. M., Nanri, K. & Zeng, L. (1991). The rapid prototyping of natural language generation components: an application of functional typology. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Sydney, 24–30 August 1991 (pp. 966–71). San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufman.Google Scholar
Bateman, J., Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. & Zeng, L. (1999). Multilingual language generation for multilingual software: a functional linguistic approach. Applied Artificial Intelligence: An International Journal, 13(6), 607–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bello, A. (1847). Gramática de la lengua castellana destinada al uso de los americanos. Santiago de Chile: Imprenta del Progreso.Google Scholar
Belloro, V. (2007). Spanish clitic doubling: a study of the syntax–pragmatics interface. Unpublished PhD dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo.Google Scholar
Belloro, V. (2009). Doblado de objeto y accesibilidad referencial. Actas del XV Congreso de la Asociación de Lingüística y Filología de América Latina. Montevideo: Universidad de la República.Google Scholar
Berry, M. (1981a). Systemic linguistics and discourse analysis: a multi-layered approach to exchange structure. In Coulthard, M. & Montgomery, M. (eds.), Studies in Discourse Analysis (pp. 120–45). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Berry, M. (1981b). Towards layers of exchange structure for directive exchanges. Network, 2, 23–32.Google Scholar
Berry, M. (2017). Stratum, delicacy, realisation and rank. In Bartlett, T. & O’Grady, G. (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics (pp. 42–55). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bloor, T. & Bloor, M. (2013). The Functional Analysis of English: A Hallidayan Approach (3rd edn). London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogard, S. (1999). Duplicación y clausura argumental: dos funciones del clítico reflexivo en español. Español actual, 71, 41–48.Google Scholar
Bosque, I. (1993). Sobre las diferencias entre los adjetivos relacionales y los calificativos. Revista Argentina de Lingüística, 9, 9–48.Google Scholar
Bull, W. E. (1960). Time, Tense and the Verb: A Study in Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, with Particular Attention to Spanish. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Burton, D. (1981). Analysing spoken discourse. In Coulthard, M. C. & Montgomery, M. (eds.), Studies in Discourse Analysis (pp. 146–57). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Caffarel, A. (1992). Interacting between a generalized tense semantics and register-specific semantic tense systems: a bistratal exploration of the semantics of French tense. Language Sciences, 14(4), 385–418. doi: 10.1016/0388-0001(92)90023-8Google Scholar
Caffarel, A. (2006). A Systemic Functional Grammar of French: From Grammar to Discourse. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Caffarel, A., Martin, J. R. & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (eds.) (2004). Language Typology: A Functional Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Caldwell, D., Knox, J. & Martin, J. R. (eds.) (2022). Appliable Linguistics and Social Semiotics: Developing Theory from Practice. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Camus, B. (1992). Negación doble y negación simple en español moderno. Revista de filología románica, 9, 63–111.Google Scholar
Carbonero, P. (1980). Afirmación, negación, duda. Revista española de lingüística, 10, 161–76.Google Scholar
Castro, S. (2010). Las disfluencias en el habla espontánea de Santiago de Chile. Unpublished Master’s thesis in linguistics, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago.Google Scholar
Catford, J. C. (1977). Fundamental Problems in Phonetics. Indiana: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Chao, Y. R. (1968). A Grammar of Spoken Chinese. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Christie, F. & Martin, J. R. (eds.) (1997). Genre and Institutions: Social Processes in the Workplace and school. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Cummings, M. (2021). Interpreting the Old English nominal group from a parsed corpus. Word, 67(4), 493–520. doi: 10.1080/00437956.2021.1993589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daneš, F. (1974). Functional sentence perspective and the organization of the text. In Daneš, F. (ed.), Papers on Functional Sentence Perspective (pp. 106–28). Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidse, K. (1991/9). Categories of Experiential Grammar (vol. 11, Monographs in Systemic Linguistics). Nottingham: Department of English and Media Studies, Nottingham Trent University.Google Scholar
Davidse, K. (1998). Agnates, verb classes and the meaning of construals: the case of ditransitivity in English. Leuvense Bijdragen, 87(3–4), 281–313.Google Scholar
Davidse, K. (2018). A tribute to M. A. K. Halliday (1925–2018). Functions of Language, 25(2), 205–28. doi: 10.1075/fol.00008.davCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Paolo, M. (1989). Double modals as single lexical items. American Speech, 64(3), 195–224. https://doi.org/10.2307/455589Google Scholar
Di Tullio, Á. (1998). Complementos no flexivos de verbos de percepción física en español. Verba: anuario galego de filoloxía, 25, 197–221.Google Scholar
Ding, L. (1999). 从问句系统看“是不是”问句 [Cóng wènjù xìtǒng kàn ‘shì bù shì’ wènjù, A study of ‘shì bù shì’ questions from the perspective of question system]. 《中国语文》 [Zhōngguó Yǔwén, Studies of the Chinese Language], (6), 415–20.Google Scholar
Doran, Y. J. & Martin, J. R. (2021). Field relations: understanding scientific explanations. In Maton, K., Martin, J. R. & Doran, Y. J. (eds.), Teaching Science: Language, Knowledge, Pedagogy (pp. 105–33). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Doran, Y. J., Martin, J. R. & Zhang, D. (eds.) (2021a). The grammar of nominal groups: systemic functional linguistic perspectives (Special Issue on the nominal group, Part 1). Word, 67(3).Google Scholar
Doran, Y. J., Martin, J. R. & Zhang, D. (eds.) (2021b). The grammar of nominal groups: systemic functional linguistic perspectives (Special Issue on the nominal group, Part 2a). Word, 67(4).Google Scholar
Doran, Y. J., Martin, J. R. & Zhang, D. (eds.) (2022a). The grammar of nominal groups: systemic functional linguistic perspectives (Special Issue on the nominal group, Part 2b). Word, 68(1).Google Scholar
Doran, Y. J., Martin, J. R. & Zhang, D. (eds.) (2022b).The grammar of nominal groups: systemic functional linguistic perspectives (Special Issues on the nominal group). Word, 68(2).Google Scholar
Dreyfus, S., Humphrey, S., Mahboob, A. & Martin, J. R. (2015). Genre Pedagogy in Higher Education: The SLATE Project. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Dumitrescu, D. (1973). Apuntes sobre el uso enfático de ‘sí’ (adv.) en el español contemporáneo. Revue roumaine de linguistique, 18(5), 407–13.Google Scholar
Dumistrescu, D. (1979). El sistema de las respuestas minimales en castellano. Revue roumaine de linguistique, 24(1), 45–54.Google Scholar
Ellegård, A. (1953). The Auxiliary ‘Do’: The Establishment and Regulation of Its Use in English. Stockholm: Almqvist och Wiksell.Google Scholar
Enrique-Arias, A. (2003). From clitics to inflections: diachronic and typological evidence for affixal object agreement marking in Spanish. In Fradin, B. (ed.), Les unités morphologiques: Forum de morphologie (3e rencontres) (pp. 67–75). Lille: Université de Lille.Google Scholar
Evans, N. (2010). Dying Words: Endangered Languages and What They Have to Tell Us. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Fang, J. (2022). A Systemic Functional Grammar of Chinese Nominal Groups: A Text-based Approach. Singapore: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fang, Y., McDonald, E. & Cheng, M. (1995). On Theme in Chinese: from clause to discourse. In Hasan, R. & Fries, P. H. (eds.), On Subject and Theme: A Discourse Functional Perspective (pp. 235–75). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Fawcett, R. (1988). What makes a ‘good’ system network good? Four pairs of concepts for such evaluations. In Benson, J. D. & Greaves, W. S. (eds.), Systemic Functional Approaches to Discourse (pp. 1–28). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Fawcett, R. (2000a). A Theory of Syntax for Systemic Functional Linguistics (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Fawcett, R. (2000b). In place of Halliday’s ‘verbal group’, Part 1: evidence from the problems of Halliday’s representations and the relative simplicity of the proposed alternative. Word, 51(2), 157–203. doi: 10.1080/00437956.2000.11432500Google Scholar
Fawcett, R. (2000c). In place of Halliday’s ‘verbal group’, Part 2: evidence from generation, semantics and interruptability. Word, 51(3), 327–75. doi: 10.1080/00437956.2000.11432503Google Scholar
Fawcett, R. (2008). Invitation to Systemic Functional Linguistics through the Cardiff Grammar (3rd edn). London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Fernández-Soriano, O. (1999a). El pronombre personal: formas y distribuciones. Pronombres átonos y tónicos. In Bosque, I. & Demonte, V. (eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española (vol. I, Sintaxis básica de las clases de palabras, pp. 1209–73). Madrid: Espasa.Google Scholar
Fernández-Soriano, O. (1999b). Two types of impersonal sentences in Spanish: locative and dative subjects. Syntax, 2(2), 101–40.Google Scholar
Figueredo, G. (2014). Uma metodologia de perfilação gramatical sistêmica baseada em corpus. Letras & letras, 30(2), 17–45. doi: 10.14393/LL60-v30n2a2014-2Google Scholar
Figueredo, G. (2021) The nominal group in Brazilian Portuguese. Word, 67(4), 461–92. doi: 10.1080/00437956.2021.1993588Google Scholar
Figueredo, G. & Figueredo, G. P. (2020). A systemic dynamics model of text production. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 27(4), 291–320. doi: 10.1080/09296174.2019.1567301Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. (1968). The case for case. In Bach, E. & Harms, T. (eds.), Universals in Linguistic Theory (pp. 1–88). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Firbas, J. (1966). Non-thematic subjects in contemporary English. Travaux linguistiques de Prague, 2, 239–56.Google Scholar
Fontaine, L. (2017). The English nominal group: the centrality of the Thing element. In Bartlett, T. & O’Grady, G. (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics (pp. 267–83). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fontaine, L. & Schönthal, D. (2019). The rooms of the house: grammar at group rank. In Thompson, G., Bowcher, W. L., Fontaine, L. & Schöntahl, D. (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics (pp. 118–41). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fontanella, M. B. (1992). Variación sincrónica y diacrónica de las construcciones con ‘haber’ en el español americano. Boletín de filología de la Universidad de Chile, 33, 35–46.Google Scholar
Fries, P. (1981). On the status of theme in English: arguments from discourse. Forum Linguisticum, 6(1), 1–38.Google Scholar
Fuentes-Rodríguez, C., Placencia, M. E. & Palma-Fahey, M. (2016). Regional pragmatic variation in the use of the discourse marker pues in informal talk among university students in Quito (Ecuador), Santiago (Chile) and Seville (Spain). Journal of Pragmatics, 97, 74–92. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2016.03.006Google Scholar
Fung, K. C. A. (2018). Analysing Cantonese doctor–patient communication: A semantic network approach. Unpublished PhD dissertation, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.Google Scholar
Garachana, M. (ed.) (2017). La gramática en la diacronía: La evolución de las perífrasis verbales modales en español. Madrid: Iberoamericana/Veuvert.Google Scholar
Gili, S. (1958/2000). Curso superior de sintaxis española (15th edn). Barcelona: Biblograf.Google Scholar
Greenberg, J. H. (1966). Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Greenberg, J. H. (ed.), Universals of Language (2nd edn, pp. 73–113). Cambridge, MA.: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gu, Y. (2002). Towards an understanding of workplace discourse: a pilot study for compiling a spoken Chinese corpus of situated discourse. In Candlin, Ch (ed.), Theory and Practice of Professional Discourse (pp. 137–85). Hong Kong: CUHK Press.Google Scholar
Guo, R. (1993). 汉语动词的过程结构 [Hànyǔ dòngcí de guòchéng jiégòu, Process structures of Chinese verbs]. 《中国语文》 [Zhōngguó Yǔwén, Studies of the Chinese Language], (6), 410–20.Google Scholar
Guzmán, J. A. (2010). La ola maldita. Paula. Retrieved on 5 August 2021 from www.latercera.com/paula/la-ola-maldita/Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1956). Grammatical categories in modern Chinese. Transactions of the Philological Society, 55(1), 178–224. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-968X.1956.tb00567.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1959–60/1966). Typology and the exotic. In Halliday, M. A. K. & McIntosh, A. (eds.), (1966), Patterns of Language: Papers in General, Descriptive and Applied Linguistics (pp. 165–82). London: Longman.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1961/2002). Categories of the theory of grammar. In Webster, J. (ed.), On Grammar (vol. I, The Collected Works of M. A. K. Halliday, pp. 37–94). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1964). Syntax and the consumer. In Stuart, C. I. J. M. (ed.), Report of the Fifteenth Annual (First International) Round Table Meeting on Linguistics and Language Study (Monograph Series on Languages and Linguistics, 17, pp. 11–24). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1964/76). English system networks. In Kress, G. (ed.), Halliday: System and Function in Language (pp. 101–35). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1965/81). Types of structure. In Halliday, M. A. K. & Martin, J. R. (eds.), Readings in Systemic Linguistics (pp. 29–41). London: Batsford.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1966). Some notes on ‘deep’ grammar. Journal of Linguistics, 2(1), 57–67. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700001328Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1966/76). The English verbal group. In Kress, G. R. (ed.), Halliday: System and Function in Language (pp. 136–58). London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1967a). Intonation and Grammar in British English. The Hague/Paris: Mouton.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1967b). Notes on Transitivity and Theme in English: part I. Journal of Linguistics, 3(1), 37–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1967c). Notes on Transitivity and Theme in English: part II. Journal of Linguistics, 3(2), 199–244.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1968). Notes on Transitivity and Theme in English: part III. Journal of Linguistics, 4(2), 179–215.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1969/76). Types of process. In Kress, G. (ed.), Halliday: System and Function in Language (pp. 159–73). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1970). A Course in Spoken English: Intonation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1970/2005). Functional diversity in language as seen from a consideration of modality and mood in English. In Webster, J. (ed.), Studies in English Language (vol. VII, The Collected Works of M. A. K. Halliday, pp. 164–204). London: Continuum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K. (1977/2003). Ideas about language. In Webster, J. (ed.), On Language and Linguistics (vol. III, The Collected Works of M. A. K. Halliday, pp.92–115). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1979/2002). Modes of meaning and modes of expression: types of grammatical structure and their determination by different semantic functions. In Webster, J. (ed.), On Grammar (vol. I, The Collected Works of M. A. K Halliday, pp. 196–218). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1981). Structure. In Halliday, M. A. K. & Martin, J. R. (eds.), Readings in Systemic Linguistics (pp. 122–31). London: Batsford.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1982/2002). The de-automatization of grammar: from Priestley’s an inspector calls. In Webster, J. (ed.), Linguistic Studies of Text and Discourse (vol. II, The Collected Works of M. A. K. Halliday, pp. 126–48). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1984a). Language as code and language as behaviour: a systemic functional interpretation of the nature and ontogenesis of dialogue. In Fawcett, R., Halliday, M. A. K., Lamb, S. & Makkai, A. (eds.), The Semiotics of Culture and Language (vol. I, Language as Social Semiotic, pp. 3–35). London: Frances Pinter.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1984/2002). On the ineffability of grammatical categories. In Webster, J. (ed.), On Grammar (vol. I, The Collected Works of M. A. K. Halliday, pp. 291–322).London/New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1984b). Linguistics in the university: the question of social accountability. In Copeland, J. E. (ed.), New Directions in Linguistics and Semiotics (pp. 51–67). Houston, TX: Rice University Studies.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1985/2005). It’s a fixed word order language is English. In Webster, J. (ed.), Studies in English Language (vol. VII, The Collected Works of M. A. K. Halliday, pp. 213–31). London: Continuum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1991/2005). Language as system and language as instance: the corpus as a theoretical construct. In Webster, J. (ed.), Computational and Quantitative Studies (vol. VI, The Collected Works of M. A. K. Halliday, pp. 76–92). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1992/2002). How do you mean? In Webster, J. (ed.), On Grammar (vol. I, The Collected Works of M. A. K Halliday, pp. 352–68). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1992/2003). Systemic grammar and the concept of a ‘science of language’. In Webster, J. (ed.), On Language and Linguistics (pp. 199–212). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An Introduction to Functional Grammar (2nd edn). London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (2003). Written language, standard language, global language. World Englishes, 22(4), 405–18.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (2010/13). Language evolving: some systemic functional reflections on the history of meaning. In Webster, J. (ed.), Halliday in the 21st Century (vol. XI, The Collected Works of M. A. K. Halliday, pp. 237–53). London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (2014). That ‘certain cut’: towards a characterology of Mandarin Chinese. Functional Linguistics, 1, 4–23. doi: 10.1186/2196-419X-1-2Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & Greaves, W. S. (2008). Intonation in the Grammar of English. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English (English Language Series; No. 9). London: Longman.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & James, Z. L. (1993). A quantitative study of polarity and primary tense in the English finite clause. In Sinclair, J. M., Hoey, M. & Fox, G. (eds.), Techniques of Description: Spoken and Written Discourse (A Festschrift for Malcolm Coulthard) (pp. 32–66). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & McDonald, E. (2004). Metafunctional profile of the grammar of Chinese. In Caffarel, A., Martin, J. R. & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (eds.), Language Typology: A Functional Perspective (pp. 305–96). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & Martin, J. R. (eds.). (1993). Writing Science: Literacy and Discursive Power. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (1999). Construing Experience through Meaning: A Language-Based Approach to Cognition. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2004). An Introduction to Functional Grammar (3rd edn). London: Hodder Arnold.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2014). Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar (4th edn). London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hao, J. (2015). Construing biology: an ideational perspective. PhD dissertation, University of Sydney. www.isfla.org/Systemics/Print/Theses/HAO_2015_PhD_THESIS.pdfGoogle Scholar
Hao, J. (2018). Reconsidering ‘cause inside the clause’ in scientific discourse: from a discourse semantic perspective in systemic functional linguistics. Text & Talk, 38(5). doi: 10.1515/text-2018-0013Google Scholar
Hao, J. (2020a). Analysing Scientific Discourse: A Framework for Exploring Knowledge Building in Biology from a Systemic Functional Linguistic Perspective. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hao, J. (2020b). Nominalisations in scientific English: a tristratal perspective. Functions of Language, 27(2), 143–73. doi: 10.1075/fol.16055.haoGoogle Scholar
Harrison, K. D. 2007. When Languages Die: The Extinction of the World’s Languages and the Erosion of Human Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hernández, A. (2006). Posesión y existencia: la competencia de ‘haber’ y ‘tener’ y ‘haber’ existencial. In Company, C. (ed.), Sintaxis histórica de la lengua Española: Primera parte – la frase verbal (vol. II, pp. 1053–160). México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México/Fondo de Cultura Económica.Google Scholar
Hernanz, M. L. & Brucart, J. M. (1987). La sintaxis (vol. I, Principios teóricos: La oración simple). Barcelona: Crítica.Google Scholar
Hoang, V. (2012). An Experiential Grammar of the Vietnamese Clause. Hanoi: Vietnam Education Publishing House.Google Scholar
Hopper, P. J. & Traugott, E. C. (2003). Grammaticalization (2nd edn). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hu, Y. (2011). 《现代汉语》[Xiàndài Hànyǔ, Modern Chinese]. Shanghai: Shanghai Education Press.Google Scholar
Huang, B. (1984). 《陈述句,疑问句,祈使句,感叹句》[Chénshù Jù, Yíwèn Jù, Qíshǐ Jù, Gǎntàn Jù, Declaratives, Interrogatives, Imperatives, Exclamatives]. Shanghai: Shanghai Education Publishing House.Google Scholar
Huang, B. & Liao, X. (2002). 《现代汉语》 [Xiàndài Hànyǔ, Modern Chinese] II. Beijing: Higher Education Press.Google Scholar
Huddleston, D. R. (1988). Constituency, multi-functionality and grammaticalization in Halliday’s Functional Grammar. Journal of Linguistics, 24, 137–74. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700011592Google Scholar
Iwasaki, S. & Ingkaphirom, P. (2005). A Reference Grammar of Thai. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1949). On the identification of phonemic entities. Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Copenhague, V (Recherches Structurales), 205–13.Google Scholar
Kashyap, A. K. (2019). Language typology. In Thompson, G., Bowcher, W. L., Fontaine, L. & Schöntal, D. (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics (pp. 767–92). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kim, M., Martin, J. R., Shin, G. & Choi, G. (2023). Korean Grammar: A Systemic-Functional Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kumar, A. (2009). A systemic functional description of the grammar of Bajjika. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Macquarie University, Sydney.Google Scholar
Laca, B. (2005). Tiempo, aspecto y la interpretación de los verbos modales en español. Lingüística ALFAL, 17, 9–44.Google Scholar
Lamb, S. (1964). The sememic approach to structural semantics. American Anthropologist, 66(3), 57–78.Google Scholar
LaPolla, R. J. (2009). Chinese as a Topic-Comment (not Topic-Prominent and not SVO) language. In Xing, J. (ed.), Studies of Chinese Linguistics: Functional Approaches (pp. 9–22). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University PressGoogle Scholar
Lavid, J. (2000). Cross-cultural variation in multilingual instructions: a study of speech act realisation patterns. In Ventola, E. (ed.), Discourse and Community: Doing Functional Linguistics (pp. 71–85). Tübingen: Günter Narr.Google Scholar
Lavid, J., Arús, J. & Zamorano-Mansilla, J. R. (2010). Systemic Functional Description of Spanish: A Contrastive Study with English. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Lee, J. L. (2018). On the discovery procedure. In Brentari, D. & Lee, J. L. (eds.), Shaping Phonology (pp. 223–33). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lee, J. L. & Goldsmith, J. A. (2016). Linguistica 5: unsupervised learning of linguistic structure. In Proceedings of the 2016 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Demonstrations (pp. 22–6). San Diego: Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar
Lemke, J. L. (1995). Textual Politics: Discourse and Social Dynamics. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Li, E. S. (2007). Systemic Functional Grammar of Chinese: A Text-Based Analysis. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Li, E. S. (2017). The nominal group in Chinese. In Bartlett, T. & O’Grady, G. (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics (pp. 338–53). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Li, C. N. & Thompson, S. A. (1981). Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley/Los Angeles/London: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, X. (2002). 现代汉语句尾“了”的语法意义及其解说 [Xiàndài Hànyǔ jùwěi ‘le’ de yǔfǎ yìyì jíqí jiěshuō, The grammatical meaning of the modal particle le and its explanation]. 《世界汉语教学》[Shìjiè Hànyǔ Jiàoxué, Chinese Teaching in the World], (3), 70–79.Google Scholar
Long, R. & Peng, X. (2012). 《现代汉语及物性研究》[Xiàndài Hànyǔ Jíwùxìng Yánjiū, Studies in Modern Chinese Transitivity]. Beijing: Peking University Press.Google Scholar
Lü, S. (1979). 《现代语法分析问题》[Xiàndài Yǔfǎ Fēnxī Wèntí, Issues in Modern Grammar Analysis]. Beijing: Commercial Press.Google Scholar
Lü, S. (1999). 《现代汉语八百词》[Xiàndài Hànyǔ Bābǎi Cí, Eight Hundred Words in Modern Chinese]. Beijing: Commercial Press.Google Scholar
Lü, S. (2014). 《中国文法要略》[Zhōngguó Wénfǎ Yàolüè, An Outline of Chinese Grammar]. Beijing: Commercial Press.Google Scholar
Ma, Q. (2005). 《汉语动词和动词性结构》[Hànyǔ Dòngcí hé Dòngcíxìng Jiégòu, Chinese Verbs and Verbal Structures]. Beijing: Peking University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. (1996). Types of structure: deconstructing notions of constituency in clause and text. In Hovy, E. H. & Scott, D. R. (eds.), Computational and Conversational Discourse: Burning Issues – An interdisciplinary Account (pp. 39–66). Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. (2002). From little things big things grow: ecogenesis in school geography. In Coe, R. M., Lingard, L. & Teslenko, T. (eds.), The Rhetoric and Ideology of Genre: Strategies for Stability and Change (pp. 243–271). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. (2004). Prosodic ‘structure’: grammar for negotiation. Ilha do Desterro: A Journal of English Language, Literatures in English and Cultural Studies, 46, 41–83. https://doi.org/10.5007/%25xGoogle Scholar
Martin, J. R. (2008a). Boomer dreaming: the texture of recolonisation in a lifestyle magazine. In Forey, G. & Thompson, G. (eds.), Text-Type and Texture: In Honour of Flo Davies (pp. 252–84). London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. (2008b). What kind of structure: interpersonal meaning and prosodic realisation across strata. Word, 59(2), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.2008.11432583Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. (2015). Cohesion and texture. In Tannen, D., Hamilton, H. E. & Schiffrin, D. (eds.), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis (2nd edn, pp. 61–81). Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. (ed.) (2018a). Interpersonal meaning: Systemic Functional Linguistics Perspectives (Special Issue of Functions of Language). 25(1). https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.25.1Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. (2018b). Discourse semantics. In Thompson, G., Bowcher, W. L., Fontaine, L. & Schönthal, D. (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics (pp. 358–81). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. (2018c). Meaning beyond the clause: co-textual relations. Linguistics and the Human Sciences, 11(2–3), 203–35. https://doi.org/10.1558/lhs.34711Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. & Doran, Y. J. (eds.) (2015a). Around Grammar: Phonology, Discourse Semantics, Multimodality (vol. III, Critical Concepts in Linguistics: Systemic Functional Linguistics). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. & Doran, Y. J. (eds.) (2015b). Grammatical Descriptions (vol. II, Critical Concepts in Linguistics: Systemic Functional Linguistics). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. & Doran, Y. J. (eds.) (2015c). Grammatics (vol. I, Critical Concepts in Linguistics: Systemic Functional Linguistics). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R., Doran, Y. J. & Figueredo, G. (eds.) (2020). Systemic Functional Language Description: Making Meaning Matter. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. & Dreyfus, S. (2015). Scaffolding semogenesis: designing teacher/student interactions for face-to-face and on-line learning. In Starc, S., Maiorani, A. & Jones, C. (eds.), Meaning Making in Text: Multimodal and Multilingual Functional Perspectives (pp. 265–98). London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (1991). Systemic typology and topology. In Christie, F. (ed.), Literacy in Social Processes: Papers from the Inaugural Australian Systemic Linguistics Conference, Held at Deakin University, January 1990 (pp. 345–83). Darwin: Centre for Studies in Language in Education, Northern Territory University.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R., Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. & Painter, C. (2010). Deploying Functional Grammar. Beijing: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R., Quiroz, B. & Figueredo, G. (eds.) (2021). Interpersonal Grammar: Systemic Functional Linguistic Theory and Description. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108663120Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. & Rose, D. (2003/2007). Working with Discourse: Meaning beyond the Clause. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. & White, P. (2005). The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R., Wang, P. & Zhu, Y. (2013). Systemic Functional Grammar: A Next Step into the Theory – Axial Relations. Beijing: Higher Education Press.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. & Zappavigna, M. (2019). Embodied meaning: a systemic functional perspective on body language. Functional Linguistics, 6(1). doi: 10.1186/s40554-018-0065-9Google Scholar
Mathesius, V. (1933). Double negation and grammatical concord. In Mélanges de linguistique et de philologie offerts à J. van Ginneken (pp. 1–33). Paris: C. Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (1995). Lexicogrammatical Cartography: English Systems. Tokyo: International Language Sciences Publishers.Google Scholar
Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (1996). TENSE in English seen through systemic-functional theory. In Berry, M., Butler, C., Fawcett, R. & Huang, G. (eds.), Meaning and Form: Systemic Functional Interpretations (pp. 431–98). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (1999). The system of TRANSITIVITY: an exploratory study of text-based profiles. Functions of Language, 6(1), 1–51. doi: 10.1075/fol.6.1.02matGoogle Scholar
Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2004). Descriptive motifs and generalizations. In Caffarel, A., Martin, J. R. & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (eds.), Language Typology: A Functional Perspective (pp. 537–664). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2006). Frequency profiles of some basic grammatical systems: an interim report. In Hunston, S. & Thompson, G. (eds.), System and Corpus: Exploring Connections (pp. 103–42). London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2007). The ‘architecture’ of language according to systemic functional theory: developments since the 1970s. In Hasan, R., Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. & Webster, J. (eds.), Continuing Discourse on Language (vol. II, pp. 505–61). London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2014). Appliable discourse analysis. In Yan, F. & Webster, J. (eds.), Developing Systemic Functional Linguistics: Theory and Application (pp. 135–205). London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2015a). Halliday on language. In Webster, J. (ed.), The Bloomsbury companion to M. A. K. Halliday (pp. 137–202). London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2015b). Reflections on researching and teaching Chinese as a foreign language. Researching and Teaching Chinese as a Foreign Language, 1(1), 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2015c). Systemic functional morphology: the lexicogrammar of the word. In Rosa Francisco de Souza, E. (ed.), Estudos de descripção funcionalista: Objetos e abordagens (pp. 150–99). Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2018). The notion of a multilingual meaning potential: a systemic exploration. In Baklouti, A. & Fontaine, L. (eds.), Perspectives from Systemic Functional Linguistics (pp. 90–120). London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2021). The architecture of phonology according to Systemic Functional Linguistics. In Teruya, K., Canzhong, W. & Slade, D. (eds.), Systemic Functional Linguistics, Part 1 (vol. I, Collected Works of Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen, pp. 288–338). Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar
Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (forthcoming). The ‘architecture’ of language according to systemic functional theory. MS.Google Scholar
Matthiessen, C. M. I. M., Arús-Hita, J. & Teruya, K. (2021). Translations of representations of moving and saying from English into Spanish. Word, 67(2), 188–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.2021.1909843Google Scholar
Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. & Bateman, J. A. (1991). Systemic Linguistics and Text Generation: Experiences from Japanese and English. London: Frances Pinter.Google Scholar
Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. & Halliday, M. A. K. (1997/2009). Systemic Functional Grammar: A First Step into the Theory. Beijing: Higher Education Press.Google Scholar
Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. & Teruya, K. (forthcoming) The Routledge Guide to Systemic Functional Linguistics: Terms, Resources and Applications. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Matthiessen, C. M. I. M., Teruya, K. & Lam, M. (2010). Key Terms in Systemic Functional Linguistics. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Matthiessen, C. M. I. M., Wang, B., Ma, Y. & Mwinlaaru, I. N. (2022). Systemic Functional Insights on Language and Linguistics. Singapore: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, E. (1994). Completive verb compounds in Modern Chinese: a new look at an old problem. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 22(2), 317–62. www.jstor.org/stable/23753925Google Scholar
McDonald, E. (1996). The ‘complement’ in Chinese grammar: a functional reinterpretation. In Hasan, R., Cloran, C. & Butt, D. (eds.), Functional Descriptions: Theory in Practice (pp. 265–86). Amsterdam: John Benjamin.Google Scholar
McDonald, E. (1998). Clause and verbal group systems in Chinese: a text-based functional approach. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Macquarie University, Sydney.Google Scholar
McDonald, E. (2017). Form and function in groups. In Bartlett, T. & O’Grady, G. (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics (pp. 251–66). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Meillet, A. (1903). Introduction à l’étude comparative des langues indo-européennes. Paris: Hachette.Google Scholar
Melis, C. & Flores, M. (2007). Los verbos pseudoimpersonales del español: una caracterización semántico-sintáctica. Verba: Anuario galego de filoloxia, 34, 7–57. http://hdl.handle.net/10347/3467Google Scholar
Montgomery, M. B. (2009). Historical and comparative perspectives on a-prefixing in the English of Appalachia. American Speech, 84(1), 5–26. https://doi.org/10.1215/00031283-2009-002Google Scholar
Moyano, E. (2010). El sistema de Tema en español: una mirada discursiva sobre una cuestión controvertida. In Ghio, E. & Fernández, M. D. (eds.), El discurso en español y portugués: Estudios desde una perspectiva sistémico-funcional (pp. 39–87). Santa Fe: Universidad Nacional del Litoral.Google Scholar
Moyano, E. (2016). Theme in English and Spanish: different means of realization for the same textual function. English Text Construction, 9(1), 190–220. https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.9.1.10moyGoogle Scholar
Moyano, E. (2021). La función de Tema en español: sus medios de realización desde la perspectiva trinocular de la Lingüística Sistémico-Funcional. Revista signos, 54(106), 487–517. doi: 10.4067/S0718-09342021000200487Google Scholar
Mwinlaaru, I. (2017). A systemic functional description of the grammar of Dagaare. Unpublished PhD dissertation, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University.Google Scholar
Mwinlaaru, I. & Xuan, W. (2016). A survey of studies in systemic functional language description and typology. Functional Linguistics, 3(8). https://functionallinguistics.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40554-016-0030–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mwinlaaru, I., Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. & Akerejola, E. (2018). A system-based typology of MOOD in African languages. In Agwuele, A. & Bodomo, A. (eds.), Handbook of African Languages (pp. 93–117). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Neale, A. (2017). Transitivity in the Cardiff Grammar. In Bartlett, T. & O’Grady, G. (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics (pp. 178–93). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nesbitt, C. & Plum, G. (1988). Probabilities in a systemic grammar: the clause complex in English. In Fawcett, R. & Young, D. (eds.), New Developments in Systemic Linguistics (vol. II, Theory and Application, pp. 6–38). London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Nespor, M., Shukla, M. & Mehler, J. (2011). Stress-timed vs. syllable-timed languages. In Oostendorp, M., Ewen, C. J., Hume, E. & Rice, K. (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Phonology (vol. II, pp. 1–13). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. doi:10.1002/9781444335262.wbctp0048Google Scholar
Ostler, N. (2005). Empires of the Word: A Language History of the World. London: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Pamies, A. (1999). Prosodic typology: on the dichotomy between stress-timed and syllable-timed languages. Language Design, 2, 103–30. http://elies.rediris.es/Language_Design/LD2/pamies.pdfGoogle Scholar
Patpong, P. (2005). A systemic functional interpretation of Thai grammar: an exploration of Thai narrative discourse. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Macquarie University, Sydney.Google Scholar
Penny, R. (2002). A History of the Spanish Language (2nd edn). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Picallo, M. C. & Rigau, G. (1999). El posesivo y las relaciones posesivas. In Bosque, I. & Demonte, V. (eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española (vol. I, Sintaxis básica de las clases de palabras, pp. 973–1023). Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.Google Scholar
Pike, L. K. (1945/72). General characteristics of intonation. In Bolinger, D. (ed.), Intonation: Selected Readings (pp. 53–82). Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
PRESEEA. (2014-22). Corpus del Proyecto para el estudio sociolingüístico del español de España y de América. Alcalá de Henares: Universidad de Alcalá. https://preseea.linguas.net/Corpus.aspxGoogle Scholar
Quiroz, B. (2008). Towards a systemic profile of the Spanish mood. Linguistics and the Human Sciences, 4(1), 31–65. https://doi.org/10.1558/lhs.v4i1.31Google Scholar
Quiroz, B. (2013). The interpersonal and experiential grammar of Chilean Spanish: towards a principled systemic-functional description based on axial argumentation. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Sydney. www.isfla.org/Systemics/Print/Theses/BQuiroz_2013.pdfGoogle Scholar
Quiroz, B. (2015). La cláusula como movimiento interactivo: una perspectiva semántico-discursiva de la gramática interpersonal del español. DELTA: Documentação de Estudios em Linguística Teorica e Aplicada, 31(1), 261–301. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0102-445023762456121953Google Scholar
Quiroz, B. (2016). Convenciones de notación sistémica. Onomázein, 33(2), 412–26. doi: 10.7764/onomazein.33.24Google Scholar
Quiroz, B. (2017a). Gramática interpersonal básica del español: una caracterización sistémico-funcional del sistema de MODO. Lenguas modernas, 49, 157–82. https://revistas.uchile.cl/index.php/LM/article/view/49231Google Scholar
Quiroz, B. (2017b). The verbal group. In Bartlett, T. & O’Grady, G. (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics (pp. 301–18). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Quiroz, B. (2018). Negotiating interpersonal meanings: reasoning about MOOD. Functions of Language, 25(1), 135–63. doi:10.1075/fol.17013.quiGoogle Scholar
Quiroz, B. (2020). Experiential cryptotypes: reasoning about PROCESS TYPE. In Martin, J. R., Doran, Y. J. & Figueredo, G. (eds.), Systemic Functional Language Description: Making Meaning Matter (pp. 102–28). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Quiroz, B. (2021). Interpersonal grammar in Spanish. In Martin, J. R., Quiroz, B. & Figuedero, G. (eds.), Interpersonal Grammar: Systemic Functional Linguistic Theory and Description (pp. 34–63). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Quiroz, B. & Martin, J. R. (2021). Perfil sistémico-funcional del grupo nominal en español: estructura, funciones discursivas básicas y organización sistémica. Estudios filológicos, 68, 123–51. doi: 10.4067/s0071-17132021000200123Google Scholar
Quiroz, B. (in press) Procesos, participantes y circunstancias: una aproximación sistémico-funcional a la estructura experiencial de la cláusula española. Boletín de Filología.Google Scholar
Rochester, S. & Martin, J. R. (1979). Crazy Talk: A Study of the Discourse of Schizophrenic Speakers. New York/London: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Rodríguez Espiñeira, M. J. (2000). Percepción directa e indirecta en español: diferencias semánticas y formales. Verba: Anuario galego de filoloxia, 27, 33–85. http://hdl.handle.net/10347/3331Google Scholar
Rojo, G. (1974). La temporalidad verbal en español. Verba: Anuario galego de filoloxia, 1, 68–149. http://hdl.handle.net/10347/2724Google Scholar
Rojo, G. & Veiga, A. (1999). El tiempo verbal: los tiempos simples. In Bosque, I. & Demonte, V. (eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española (vol. II, pp. 2867–934). Madrid: Espasa.Google Scholar
Rose, D. (2001). The Western Desert Code: An Australian Cryptogrammar. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Rose, D. (2005). Narrative and the origins of discourse: construing experience in stories around the world. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 19, 151–73. https://doi.org/10.1075/aralss.19.09rosGoogle Scholar
Rose, D. & Martin, J. R. (2012). Learning to Write, Reading to Learn: Genre, Knowledge and Pedagogy in the Sydney School. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Sapir, E. (1921). Language: An Introduction to the Study of Speech.New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Silva-Corvalán, C. (1980–1). La función pragmática de la duplicación de pronombres clíticos. Boletín de filología de la Universidad de Chile: Homenaje a Ambrosio Rabanales, 31, 561–70.Google Scholar
Silva-Corvalán, C. (1981). The diffusion of object-verb agreement in Spanish. Papers in Romance, 3(2), 163–76.Google Scholar
Soto, G. (2009). Vigencia y significado del pretérito anterior: un estudio a partir del español escrito en Chile. Estudios filológicos, 44, 227–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0071-17132009000100014Google Scholar
Steiner, E. & Yallop, C. (eds.) (2001). Exploring Translation and Multilingual Text Production: Beyond Content. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Suñer, M. (1978). Perception verb complements in Spanish: same or different? Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 23(1), 107–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taboada, M. (1995). Theme markedness in English and Spanish: a systemic-functional approach. Universidad Complutense de Madrid. www.sfu.ca/~mtaboada/docs/taboada-theme-markedness.pdfGoogle Scholar
Tam, H. R. (2004). A systemic-functional interpretation of Cantonese clause grammar. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Sydney.Google Scholar
Tann, K. (2017). Context and meaning in the Sydney architecture of SFL. In Bartlett, T. & O’Grady, G. (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics (pp. 438–56). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tao, L. (1998). “是不是”问句说略 [‘Shì bù shì’ wènjù shuōlüè, A brief account of ‘shì bù shì’ questions].《中国语文》[Zhōngguó Yǔwén, Studies of the Chinese Language], (2), 105–7.Google Scholar
Taverniers, M. (2018). Grammatical metaphor and grammaticalization: the case of metaphors of modality. Functions of Language, 25(1), 159–200. https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.17014.tavGoogle Scholar
Teich, E. (1999). System-oriented and text-oriented comparative linguistic research: cross-linguistic variation in translation. Languages in Contrast, 2(2), 187–210. https://doi.org/10.1075/lic.2.2.04teiGoogle Scholar
Teich, E., Degaetano-Ortlieb, S., Fankhauser, P., Kermes, H. & Lapshinova-Koltunski, E. (2016). The linguistic construal of disciplinarity: a data-mining approach using register features. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(7), 1668–78.Google Scholar
Teruya, K. (1998). An exploration into the world of experience: a systemic-functional interpretation of the grammar of Japanese. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Macquarie University, Sydney.Google Scholar
Teruya, K. (2007). A Systemic Functional Grammar of Japanese (2 vols). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Teruya, K., Akerejola, E., Andersen, T. H., Caffarel, A., Lavid, J., Matthiessen, C. M. I. M., Petersen, U. H., Patpong, P. & Smedegaard, F. (2007). Typology of MOOD: a text-based and system-based functional view. In Hasan, R., Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. & Webster, J. (eds.), Continuing Discourse on Language: A Functional Perspective (vol. II, pp. 859–920). London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Teruya, K. & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2015). Halliday in relation to language comparison and typology. In Webster, J. (ed.), The Bloomsbury Companion to M. A. K. Halliday (pp. 427–52). London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Thai, M. D. (2004). Metafunctional profile: Vietnamese. In Caffarel, A., Martin, J. R. & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (eds.), Language Typology: A Functional Perspective (pp. 397–431). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Thompson, G. (2013). Introducing Functional Grammar (3rd edn). London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tornel, J. L. (2001–2). Perífrasis verbales y consideraciones metodológicas (I y II). Contextos, 37–40, 39–88. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/2161011.pdfGoogle Scholar
Trubetzkoy, N. S. (1939). Grundzüge der Phonologie (Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Prague, vol. 7). Prague.Google Scholar
Tsao, F. (1980). A Functional Study of Topic in Chinese: The First Step towards Discourse Analysis. Taipei: Student Book Co.Google Scholar
Vázquez, V. & García, M. (2012). A discourse-based analysis of object clitic doubling in Spanish. In Davidse, K., Breban, T., Brems, L. & Mortelmans, T. (eds.), Grammaticalization and Language Change: New Reflections (pp. 271–97). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Veiga, A. (2004a). Cantaba y canté: sobre una hipótesis temporal y alguna de sus repercusiones. ELUA, Anexo 2 (El verbo), 599–614. http://dx.doi.org/10.14198/ELUA2004.Anexo2.29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veiga, A. (2004b). La forma verbal ‘cantaba’ y la estructura modo-temporal del sistema verbal español. In García Fernández, L. & Camus Bergareche, B. (eds.), El pretérito imperfecto (pp. 96–193). Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Ventola, E. (1987). The Structure of Social Interaction: A Systemic Approach to the Semiotics of Service Encounters. London: Frances Pinter.Google Scholar
Wang, L. (2011).《中国现代语法》[Zhōngguó Xiāndài Yǔfǎ, Modern Grammar of Chinese]. Beijing: Commercial Press.Google Scholar
Wang, P. (2020a). Construing entities through nominal groups in Chinese. In M. Zappavigna & S. Dreyfus (eds.), Discourses of Hope and Reconciliation: On J. R. Martin’s Contribution to Systemic Functional Linguistics (pp. 57–83). London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Wang, P. (2020b). Axial argumentation and cryptogrammar in interpersonal grammar: a case study of classical Tibetan. In Martin, J. R., Doran, Y. J. & G. Figueredo, (eds.), Systemic Functional Language Description: Making Meaning Matter (pp. 73–101). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wang, P. (2021). Interpersonal grammar in Chinese. In Martin, J. R., Quiroz, B. & Figueredo, G. (eds.), Interpersonal Grammar: Systemic Functional Linguistic Theory and Description (pp. 96–129). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, J. (ed.) (2004). The Language of Early Childhood (vol. IV, The Collected Works of M. A. K. Halliday). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Webster, J. (ed.) (2005). Computational and Quantitative Studies (vol. VI, The Collected Works of M. A. K. Halliday). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Westermann, D. (1907). Grammatik der Ewe-Sprache. Berlin: Dietrich Reimar (Ernst Vohsen).Google Scholar
Westermann, D. (1930). A Ststudy of the Ewe Llaanguage. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Whorf, B. L. (1945). Grammatical categories. Language, 21(1), 1–11. doi: 10.2307/410199. [Repr. In J. B. Carrol, (ed.) (1956). Language, Thought, and Reality: Selected Writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf (pp. 87–101). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.]Google Scholar
Wiessner, P. W. (2014). Embers of society: firelight talk among the Ju/’hoansi Bushmen. PNAS, 111(39), 14027–35. doi: 10.1073/pnas.140421211Google Scholar
Wilson, E. O. (2019). Genesis: The Deep Origin of Societies. New York/London: Liveright Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
Zappavigna, M. & Martin, J. R. (2018). Discourse and Diversionary Justice: An Analysis of Youth Justice Conferencing. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Zavala, V. (2001). Borrowing evidential functions from Quechua: the role of pues as a discourse marker in Andean Spanish. Journal of Pragmatics, 33, 999–1023. doi: 10.1016/S0378-2166(00)00049-7Google Scholar
Zhou, X. (1997). Material and relational transitivity in Mandarin Chinese. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
Zhu, D. (1982). 《语法讲义》[Yǔfǎ Jiǎngyì, Lectures on Chinese Grammar]. Beijing: Commercial Press.Google Scholar
Zuo, S. (1999). 现代汉语中“体”的研究——兼及体研究的类型学意义 [‘Xiàndài Hànyǔ zhōng ‘tǐ’ de yánjiū – jiānjí tǐ yánjiū de lèixíngxué yìyì, A study of ‘aspect’ in Modern Chinese and typological significance of aspect studies].《语文研究》[Yǔwén Yánjiū, Linguistic Research], (1), 9–20.Google Scholar