Book contents
References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 September 2009
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Subjects and Universal GrammarAn Explanatory Theory, pp. 222 - 230Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2006
References
Aissen, Judith L. 1983. “Indirect Object Advancement in Tzotzil.” In , ed., Studies in Relational Grammar vol. I. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 272–302Google Scholar
1999. “Markedness and Subject Choice in Optimality Theory.”Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 17: 673–711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2003. “Differential Object Marking: Iconicity vs. Economy.”Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21: 435–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, Avery. 1985. “The Major Functions of the Noun Phrase.” In ed., Language Typology and Syntactic Description, vol. I, Clause Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 62–154Google Scholar
Arka, I Wayan. 1998. “From Morphosyntax to Pragmatics in Balinese: A Lexical-Functional Approach”. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Sydney
Arka, I Wayan, and Christopher D. Manning. 1998. “Voice and Grammatical Relations in Indonesian: A New Perspective.” In Miriam Butt and Tracy Holloway King, eds., Proceedings of the LFG 98 Conference, The University of Queensland, Brisbane. Online: CSLI Publications. http://cslipublications.stanford.edu/LFG/3/lfg98.html
Arka, I Wayan, and Jane Simpson. 1998. “Control and Complex Arguments in Balinese.” in and , eds., Proceedings of the LFG 98 Conference, The University of Queensland, Brisbane. Online: CSLI Publications
1988. Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Baker, Mark C. 1997. “Thematic Roles and Syntactic Structure.” In , ed., Elements of Grammar: Handbook of Generative Syntax. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 73–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, Sarah J. 1983. “Advancements and Ascensions in Cebuano.” In , ed., Studies in Relational Grammar vol. I. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 143–218Google Scholar
. 1988. “Semantic and Pragmatic Constraints on Tuvaluan Raising.”Linguistics 26: 747–778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 2000. “A Fresh Look at Grammatical Relations in Indo-Aryan.”Lingua 110: 343–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 1996a. “Ergativity: Towards a Theory of a Heterogeneous Class.”Linguistic Inquiry 27: 531–604Google Scholar
, and . 1996b. “The Structural Determination of Case and Agreement.”Linguistic Inquiry 27: 1–68Google Scholar
, , and . 2001. “Satisfying Constraints on Extraction and Adjunction.”Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 19: 1–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bresnan, Joan 1982. “Control and Complementation.” In , ed., The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. 282–390Google Scholar
Bresnan, Joan 1995. “Linear Order, Syntactic Rank, and Empty Categories: On Weak Crossover.” In , , III, and , eds., Formal Issues in Lexical-Functional Grammar. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI Publications. 241–274Google Scholar
, and . 1987. “Topic, Pronoun, and Agreement in Chicheŵa.”Language 63: 741–782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bresnan, Joan, and Annie Zaenen 1990. “Deep Unaccusativity in LFG.” In , , and , eds., Grammatical Relations: A Cross-Theoretical Perspective. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI Publications. 45–57Google Scholar
. In press. A Choctaw Reference Grammar. Lincoln, Nebr.: University of Nebraska Press
. 1986. Italian Syntax: A Government-Binding Approach. Dordrecht: D. Reidel
. 1982. Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam 2000. “Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework.” In , and , eds., Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. 89–155Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam, and Howard Lasnik 1993. “The Theory of Principles and Parameters.” In , , , and , eds., Syntax: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 506–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1978. Case Marking and Grammatical Relations in Polynesian. Austin: University of Texas PressGoogle Scholar
, and . 1980. “The History of Raising and Relativization in Polynesian.”Language 56: 622–638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, Peter 1983. “Switch-Reference in Two Quechua Languages.” In and , eds., Switch Reference and Universal Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard 1978. “Ergativity.” In , ed., Syntactic Typology: Studies in the Phenomenology of Language. Austin: University of Texas Press. 329–394Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard 1979. “Degrees of Ergativity: Some Chukchee Evidence.” In , ed., Ergativity: Towards a Theory of Grammatical Relations. New York: Academic Press. 219–240Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard 1983. “Switch-Reference in Huichol: A Typological Study.” In and , eds., Switch Reference and Universal Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 18–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1989. Language Universals and Linguistic Typology (2nd edition). Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
Cooreman, Ann M., Barbara Fox, and Talmy Givón 1988. “The Discourse Definition of Ergativity: A Study of Chamorro and Tagalog Texts.” In , ed., Studies in Austronesian Linguistics. Athens, Ohio: Ohio University Center for International Studies. 387–425Google Scholar
. 2001. Lexical-Functional Grammar (Syntax and Semantics, vol. xxxiv). New York: Academic PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 2000. “Feature Indeterminacy and Feature Resolution.”Language 76: 759–798CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalrymple, Mary, Ron Kaplan, and Tracy Holloway King. 2001. “Weak Crossover and the Absence of Traces.” In and , eds., Proceedings of the LFG 01 Conference, University of Hong Kong. Online: CSLI Publications. 66–82. http://cslipublications.stanford.edu/LFG/6/lfg01.htmlGoogle Scholar
Davies, William D. 1984. “Antipassive: Choctaw Evidence for a Universal Characterization.” In and , eds., Studies in Relational Grammar vol. II. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 331–376Google Scholar
1972. The Dyirbal Language of North Queensland. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
1979. “Corrections and Comments Concerning Heath's ‘Is Dyirbal Ergative?’.”Linguistics 17: 1003–1015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1986. “Primary Objects, Secondary Objects and Antidative.”Language 62: 808–845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1985. A Grammar of Acehnese on the Basis of a Dialect of North Aceh. Dordrecht: ForisGoogle Scholar
Falk, Yehuda N. 1994. “A New Look at Agreement.” Proceedings of the Ninth Annual Meeting of the Israel Association for Theoretical Linguistics, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beersheva, June 21–22, 1993
Falk, Yehuda N. 1996. “Case Typology and Case Theory.” Department of English, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Falk, Yehuda N. 1999. “Philippine Subjects in a Monostratal Framework.” Sixth annual conference of the Austronesian Formal Linguistics Association, April 16–18, 1999, University of Toronto
Falk, Yehuda N. 2000. “Pivots and the Theory of Grammatical Functions.” In Miriam Butt and Tracy Holloway King, eds., Proceedings of the LFG 00 Conference, University of California, Berkeley. Online: CSLI Publications. 122–138. http://cslipublications.stanford.edu/LFG/5/lfg00.html
2001. Lexical-Functional Grammar: An Introduction to Parallel Constraint-Based Syntax. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI PublicationsGoogle Scholar
Falk, Yehuda N. 2002. “Resumptive Pronouns in LFG.” In Miriam Butt and Tracy Holloway King, eds., Proceedings of the LFG 02 Conference, National Technical University of Athens, Athens. Online: CSLI Publications. 154–173. http://cslipublications.stanford.edu/LFG/7/lfg02.html
Falk, Yehuda N. 2005. “Open Argument Functions.” In Miriam Butt and Tracy Holloway King, eds., Proceedings of the LFG 05 Conference, University of Bergen. Online: CSLI Publications. http://cslipublications.stanford.edu/LFG/10/lfg05.html
, , and . 1991. “Notions of Subjecthood and Switch Reference: Evidence from Seri.”Linguistic Inquiry 22: 431–456Google Scholar
Finer, Daniel L. 1985. “The Syntax of Switch-Reference.” Linguistic Inquiry 16: 35–55
, and 1984. Functional Syntax and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
. 1981. “Unbounded Dependencies and Coordinate Structure.”Linguistic Inquiry 12: 155–184Google Scholar
, and . 2000. Interrogative Investigations: The Form, Meaning, and Use of English Interrogatives. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI PublicationsGoogle Scholar
1990. Syntax: A Functional-Typological Introduction, vol. II. Philadelphia: John BenjaminsGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Lynn 1983. “Switch Reference, Clause Order, and Interclausal Relationships in Maricopa.” In and , eds., Switch Reference and Universal Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 83–104Google Scholar
, , and . 1992. “SPEC of IP and SPEC of VP: Two Subjects in Austronesian Languages.”Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 10: 375–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and 1983. “Introduction.” In Switch-Reference and Universal Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ⅸ–ⅹⅴCrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1983. “Warlpiri and the Grammar of Non-Configurational Languages.”Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 1: 5–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hale, Ken 1992. “Subject Obviation, Switch Reference, and Control.” In , , , and , eds., Control and Grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 51–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1999. “Processing Complexity and Filler-Gap Dependencies Across Grammars.”Language 72: 244–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1984. “On the Distribution and Reference of Empty Pronouns.”Linguistic Inquiry 15: 531–574Google Scholar
Huang, C.-T. James 1989. “Pro-Drop in Chinese: A Generalized Control Theory.” In and , eds., The Null Subject Parameter. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 185–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1984. An Introduction to the Grammar of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1987. “The Status of Thematic Relations in Linguistic Theory.”Linguistic Inquiry 18: 369–411Google Scholar
Jaeggli, Osvaldo, and Ken Safir 1989. “The Null Subject Parameter and Parametric Theory.” In and , eds., The Null Subject Parameter. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 1–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, Ronald M., and Joan Bresnan 1982. “Lexical-Functional Grammar: A Formal System for Grammatical Representation.” In , ed., The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. 173–281Google Scholar
Kaplan, Ronald M., and John T. Maxwell, III 1995. “Constituent Coordination in Lexical-Functional Grammar.” In Mary Dalrymple, Ronald M. Kaplan, John T. Maxwell III, and Annie Zaenen, eds., Formal Issues in Lexical-Functional Grammar. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI Publications. First published in 1988, Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING88), Budapest, vol. I. 199–210
, and , III. 1996. Grammar Writer's Workbench (Technical Report). Palo Alto, Calif.: Xerox Palo Alto Research Center. ftp://ftp.parc.xerox.com/pub/lfg/lfgmanual.psGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, Ronald M., and Annie Zaenen 1989. “Long-Distance Dependencies, Constituent Structure, and Functional Uncertainty.” In Mark R. Baltin and Anthony S. Kroch, eds., Alternative Conceptions of Phrase Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 17–42
Keenan, Edward L. 1976. “Towards a Universal Definition of “Subject.” In , ed., Subject and Topic. New York: Academic Press. 303–333Google Scholar
, and . 1977. “Noun Phrase Accessibility and Universal Grammar.”Linguistic Inquiry 8: 63–99Google Scholar
1987. “Constructions with Clause Actants in Daghestanian Languages.”Lingua 71: 133–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1993. Phrase Structure and Grammatical Relations in Tagalog. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI PublicationsGoogle Scholar
, and . 1979. “Subject and (Switch-)Reference in Yuman.”Folia Linguistica 13: 321–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2001. “The Configurational Structure of a Nonconfigurational Language.”Linguistic Variation Yearbook 1: 61–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 1995. Unaccusativity: At the Syntax–Lexical Semantics Interface. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
, and . 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley: University of California PressGoogle Scholar
Li, Charles N., and Sandra A. Thompson 1976. “Subject and Topic: A New Typology of Language.” In , ed., Subject and Topic. New York: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
Lødrup, Helge 2000. “Underspecification in Lexical Mapping Theory: The Case of Norwegian Existentials and Resultatives.” In and , eds., Argument Realization. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI Publications. 171–188Google Scholar
Lynch, John 1983. “Switch-Reference in Lenakel.” In and , eds., Switch Reference and Universal Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 209–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCloskey, Jim 1997. “Subjecthood and Subject Positions.” in , ed., Elements of Grammar: Handbook of Generative Syntax. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 197–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 1981. Language Typology: Cross-Linguistic Studies in Syntax. Amsterdam: North-HollandGoogle Scholar
1996. Ergativity: Argument Structure and Grammatical Relations. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI PublicationsGoogle Scholar
Marantz, Alec 1982. “Grammatical Relations and Explanation in Linguistics.” In , ed., Subjects and Other Subjects: Proceedings of the Harvard Conference on the Representation of Grammatical Relations. Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana University Linguistics Club. 1–24Google Scholar
Mohanan, K. P. 1982. “Grammatical Relations and Clause Structure in Malayalam.” In , ed., The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. 504–589Google Scholar
, and . 2000. “What Does it Take to be a Dative Subject?”Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18: 373–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 1982. “Syntactic Relations in Western Muskogean: A Typological Perspective.”Language 58: 81–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murasugi, Kumiko G. 1992. “Crossing and Nested Paths: NP Movement in Accusative and Ergative Languages”. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT
. 1998. Constructive Case: Evidence from Australian Languages. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI PublicationsGoogle Scholar
Perlmutter, David M. 1978. “Impersonal Passives and the Unaccusative Hypothesis.” BLS 4
, ed., 1983. Studies in Relational Grammar, vol. I. Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
Perlmutter, David M. 1984. “The Inadequacy of Some Monostratal Theories of Passive.” In and , eds., Studies in Relational Gramma, vol. II. Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
Perlmutter, David M., and Paul M. Postal 1983. “Towards a Universal Characterization of Passivization.” In , ed., Studies in Relational Grammar, vol. I. Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
, ed., 1979. Ergativity: Towards a Theory of Grammatical Relations. New York: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
, and . 1994. Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI PublicationsGoogle Scholar
1997. “The Morpholexical Nature of English to Contraction.”Language 73: 79–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1997. Syntactic Theory and the Structure of English: A Minimalist Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rappaport Hovav, Malka, and Beth Levin (2003) “Deconstructing Thematic Hierarchies.” Ms., The Hebrew University of Jerusalem and Stanford University
. 1986. “Null Objects in Italian and the Theory of pro.”Linguistic Inquiry 17: 501–557Google Scholar
Sadler, Louisa. 1999. “Non-Distributive Features in Welsh Coordination.” In Miriam Butt and Tracy Holloway King, eds., Proceedings of the LFG 99 Conference, The University of Manchester. Online: CSLI Publications. http://cslipublications.stanford.edu/LFG/4/lfg99.html
, and . 1991. “An Integrated Theory of Complement Control.”Language 67: 63–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schachter, Paul 1976. “The Subject in Philippine Languages: Topic, Actor, Actor-Topic, or None of the Above.” In , ed., Subject and Topic. New York: Academic Press. 493–518Google Scholar
Schachter, Paul 1987. “Tagalog.” In , ed., The World's Major Languages. New York: Oxford University Press. 936–958Google Scholar
Seiter, William J. 1983. “Subject–Direct Object Raising in Niuean.” In , ed., Studies in Relational Grammar, vol. I. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 317–359Google Scholar
Sells, Peter. 1984. “Syntax and Semantics of Resumptive Pronouns”. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst
. 1988. “Complementizer-Cliticization in Hebrew and the Empty Category Principle.”Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6: 191–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, Jane. 1983. “Aspects of Warlpiri Morphology and Syntax”. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT
, and . 1983. “Control and Obviation in Warlpiri.”Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 1: 49–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1987. “The Variable Status of complementizer-Trace Phenomena.”Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 5: 33–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 1999. “Empty Subjects in Finnish and Hebrew.”Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 17: 613–671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 1997. Syntax: Structure, Meaning, and Function. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 1998. “Syntactic Ergativity in Balinese: An Argument Structure Based Theory.”Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 16: 387–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woolford, Ellen. 1997. “Four-Way Case Systems: Ergative, Nominative, Objective and Accusative.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory. 181–227
Ziv, Yael 1976. “On the Reanalysis of Grammatical Terms in Hebrew Possessive Constructions.” In , ed., Studies in Modern Hebrew Syntax and Semantics: The Transformational-Generative Approach. Amsterdam: North-HollandGoogle Scholar
Aissen, Judith L. 1983. “Indirect Object Advancement in Tzotzil.” In , ed., Studies in Relational Grammar vol. I. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 272–302Google Scholar
1999. “Markedness and Subject Choice in Optimality Theory.”Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 17: 673–711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2003. “Differential Object Marking: Iconicity vs. Economy.”Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21: 435–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, Avery. 1985. “The Major Functions of the Noun Phrase.” In ed., Language Typology and Syntactic Description, vol. I, Clause Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 62–154Google Scholar
Arka, I Wayan. 1998. “From Morphosyntax to Pragmatics in Balinese: A Lexical-Functional Approach”. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Sydney
Arka, I Wayan, and Christopher D. Manning. 1998. “Voice and Grammatical Relations in Indonesian: A New Perspective.” In Miriam Butt and Tracy Holloway King, eds., Proceedings of the LFG 98 Conference, The University of Queensland, Brisbane. Online: CSLI Publications. http://cslipublications.stanford.edu/LFG/3/lfg98.html
Arka, I Wayan, and Jane Simpson. 1998. “Control and Complex Arguments in Balinese.” in and , eds., Proceedings of the LFG 98 Conference, The University of Queensland, Brisbane. Online: CSLI Publications
1988. Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Baker, Mark C. 1997. “Thematic Roles and Syntactic Structure.” In , ed., Elements of Grammar: Handbook of Generative Syntax. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 73–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, Sarah J. 1983. “Advancements and Ascensions in Cebuano.” In , ed., Studies in Relational Grammar vol. I. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 143–218Google Scholar
. 1988. “Semantic and Pragmatic Constraints on Tuvaluan Raising.”Linguistics 26: 747–778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 2000. “A Fresh Look at Grammatical Relations in Indo-Aryan.”Lingua 110: 343–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 1996a. “Ergativity: Towards a Theory of a Heterogeneous Class.”Linguistic Inquiry 27: 531–604Google Scholar
, and . 1996b. “The Structural Determination of Case and Agreement.”Linguistic Inquiry 27: 1–68Google Scholar
, , and . 2001. “Satisfying Constraints on Extraction and Adjunction.”Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 19: 1–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bresnan, Joan 1982. “Control and Complementation.” In , ed., The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. 282–390Google Scholar
Bresnan, Joan 1995. “Linear Order, Syntactic Rank, and Empty Categories: On Weak Crossover.” In , , III, and , eds., Formal Issues in Lexical-Functional Grammar. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI Publications. 241–274Google Scholar
, and . 1987. “Topic, Pronoun, and Agreement in Chicheŵa.”Language 63: 741–782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bresnan, Joan, and Annie Zaenen 1990. “Deep Unaccusativity in LFG.” In , , and , eds., Grammatical Relations: A Cross-Theoretical Perspective. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI Publications. 45–57Google Scholar
. In press. A Choctaw Reference Grammar. Lincoln, Nebr.: University of Nebraska Press
. 1986. Italian Syntax: A Government-Binding Approach. Dordrecht: D. Reidel
. 1982. Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam 2000. “Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework.” In , and , eds., Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. 89–155Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam, and Howard Lasnik 1993. “The Theory of Principles and Parameters.” In , , , and , eds., Syntax: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 506–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1978. Case Marking and Grammatical Relations in Polynesian. Austin: University of Texas PressGoogle Scholar
, and . 1980. “The History of Raising and Relativization in Polynesian.”Language 56: 622–638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, Peter 1983. “Switch-Reference in Two Quechua Languages.” In and , eds., Switch Reference and Universal Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard 1978. “Ergativity.” In , ed., Syntactic Typology: Studies in the Phenomenology of Language. Austin: University of Texas Press. 329–394Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard 1979. “Degrees of Ergativity: Some Chukchee Evidence.” In , ed., Ergativity: Towards a Theory of Grammatical Relations. New York: Academic Press. 219–240Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard 1983. “Switch-Reference in Huichol: A Typological Study.” In and , eds., Switch Reference and Universal Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 18–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1989. Language Universals and Linguistic Typology (2nd edition). Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
Cooreman, Ann M., Barbara Fox, and Talmy Givón 1988. “The Discourse Definition of Ergativity: A Study of Chamorro and Tagalog Texts.” In , ed., Studies in Austronesian Linguistics. Athens, Ohio: Ohio University Center for International Studies. 387–425Google Scholar
. 2001. Lexical-Functional Grammar (Syntax and Semantics, vol. xxxiv). New York: Academic PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 2000. “Feature Indeterminacy and Feature Resolution.”Language 76: 759–798CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalrymple, Mary, Ron Kaplan, and Tracy Holloway King. 2001. “Weak Crossover and the Absence of Traces.” In and , eds., Proceedings of the LFG 01 Conference, University of Hong Kong. Online: CSLI Publications. 66–82. http://cslipublications.stanford.edu/LFG/6/lfg01.htmlGoogle Scholar
Davies, William D. 1984. “Antipassive: Choctaw Evidence for a Universal Characterization.” In and , eds., Studies in Relational Grammar vol. II. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 331–376Google Scholar
1972. The Dyirbal Language of North Queensland. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
1979. “Corrections and Comments Concerning Heath's ‘Is Dyirbal Ergative?’.”Linguistics 17: 1003–1015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1986. “Primary Objects, Secondary Objects and Antidative.”Language 62: 808–845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1985. A Grammar of Acehnese on the Basis of a Dialect of North Aceh. Dordrecht: ForisGoogle Scholar
Falk, Yehuda N. 1994. “A New Look at Agreement.” Proceedings of the Ninth Annual Meeting of the Israel Association for Theoretical Linguistics, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beersheva, June 21–22, 1993
Falk, Yehuda N. 1996. “Case Typology and Case Theory.” Department of English, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Falk, Yehuda N. 1999. “Philippine Subjects in a Monostratal Framework.” Sixth annual conference of the Austronesian Formal Linguistics Association, April 16–18, 1999, University of Toronto
Falk, Yehuda N. 2000. “Pivots and the Theory of Grammatical Functions.” In Miriam Butt and Tracy Holloway King, eds., Proceedings of the LFG 00 Conference, University of California, Berkeley. Online: CSLI Publications. 122–138. http://cslipublications.stanford.edu/LFG/5/lfg00.html
2001. Lexical-Functional Grammar: An Introduction to Parallel Constraint-Based Syntax. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI PublicationsGoogle Scholar
Falk, Yehuda N. 2002. “Resumptive Pronouns in LFG.” In Miriam Butt and Tracy Holloway King, eds., Proceedings of the LFG 02 Conference, National Technical University of Athens, Athens. Online: CSLI Publications. 154–173. http://cslipublications.stanford.edu/LFG/7/lfg02.html
Falk, Yehuda N. 2005. “Open Argument Functions.” In Miriam Butt and Tracy Holloway King, eds., Proceedings of the LFG 05 Conference, University of Bergen. Online: CSLI Publications. http://cslipublications.stanford.edu/LFG/10/lfg05.html
, , and . 1991. “Notions of Subjecthood and Switch Reference: Evidence from Seri.”Linguistic Inquiry 22: 431–456Google Scholar
Finer, Daniel L. 1985. “The Syntax of Switch-Reference.” Linguistic Inquiry 16: 35–55
, and 1984. Functional Syntax and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
. 1981. “Unbounded Dependencies and Coordinate Structure.”Linguistic Inquiry 12: 155–184Google Scholar
, and . 2000. Interrogative Investigations: The Form, Meaning, and Use of English Interrogatives. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI PublicationsGoogle Scholar
1990. Syntax: A Functional-Typological Introduction, vol. II. Philadelphia: John BenjaminsGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Lynn 1983. “Switch Reference, Clause Order, and Interclausal Relationships in Maricopa.” In and , eds., Switch Reference and Universal Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 83–104Google Scholar
, , and . 1992. “SPEC of IP and SPEC of VP: Two Subjects in Austronesian Languages.”Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 10: 375–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and 1983. “Introduction.” In Switch-Reference and Universal Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ⅸ–ⅹⅴCrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1983. “Warlpiri and the Grammar of Non-Configurational Languages.”Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 1: 5–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hale, Ken 1992. “Subject Obviation, Switch Reference, and Control.” In , , , and , eds., Control and Grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 51–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1999. “Processing Complexity and Filler-Gap Dependencies Across Grammars.”Language 72: 244–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1984. “On the Distribution and Reference of Empty Pronouns.”Linguistic Inquiry 15: 531–574Google Scholar
Huang, C.-T. James 1989. “Pro-Drop in Chinese: A Generalized Control Theory.” In and , eds., The Null Subject Parameter. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 185–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1984. An Introduction to the Grammar of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1987. “The Status of Thematic Relations in Linguistic Theory.”Linguistic Inquiry 18: 369–411Google Scholar
Jaeggli, Osvaldo, and Ken Safir 1989. “The Null Subject Parameter and Parametric Theory.” In and , eds., The Null Subject Parameter. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 1–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, Ronald M., and Joan Bresnan 1982. “Lexical-Functional Grammar: A Formal System for Grammatical Representation.” In , ed., The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. 173–281Google Scholar
Kaplan, Ronald M., and John T. Maxwell, III 1995. “Constituent Coordination in Lexical-Functional Grammar.” In Mary Dalrymple, Ronald M. Kaplan, John T. Maxwell III, and Annie Zaenen, eds., Formal Issues in Lexical-Functional Grammar. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI Publications. First published in 1988, Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING88), Budapest, vol. I. 199–210
, and , III. 1996. Grammar Writer's Workbench (Technical Report). Palo Alto, Calif.: Xerox Palo Alto Research Center. ftp://ftp.parc.xerox.com/pub/lfg/lfgmanual.psGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, Ronald M., and Annie Zaenen 1989. “Long-Distance Dependencies, Constituent Structure, and Functional Uncertainty.” In Mark R. Baltin and Anthony S. Kroch, eds., Alternative Conceptions of Phrase Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 17–42
Keenan, Edward L. 1976. “Towards a Universal Definition of “Subject.” In , ed., Subject and Topic. New York: Academic Press. 303–333Google Scholar
, and . 1977. “Noun Phrase Accessibility and Universal Grammar.”Linguistic Inquiry 8: 63–99Google Scholar
1987. “Constructions with Clause Actants in Daghestanian Languages.”Lingua 71: 133–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1993. Phrase Structure and Grammatical Relations in Tagalog. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI PublicationsGoogle Scholar
, and . 1979. “Subject and (Switch-)Reference in Yuman.”Folia Linguistica 13: 321–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2001. “The Configurational Structure of a Nonconfigurational Language.”Linguistic Variation Yearbook 1: 61–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 1995. Unaccusativity: At the Syntax–Lexical Semantics Interface. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
, and . 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley: University of California PressGoogle Scholar
Li, Charles N., and Sandra A. Thompson 1976. “Subject and Topic: A New Typology of Language.” In , ed., Subject and Topic. New York: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
Lødrup, Helge 2000. “Underspecification in Lexical Mapping Theory: The Case of Norwegian Existentials and Resultatives.” In and , eds., Argument Realization. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI Publications. 171–188Google Scholar
Lynch, John 1983. “Switch-Reference in Lenakel.” In and , eds., Switch Reference and Universal Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 209–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCloskey, Jim 1997. “Subjecthood and Subject Positions.” in , ed., Elements of Grammar: Handbook of Generative Syntax. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 197–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 1981. Language Typology: Cross-Linguistic Studies in Syntax. Amsterdam: North-HollandGoogle Scholar
1996. Ergativity: Argument Structure and Grammatical Relations. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI PublicationsGoogle Scholar
Marantz, Alec 1982. “Grammatical Relations and Explanation in Linguistics.” In , ed., Subjects and Other Subjects: Proceedings of the Harvard Conference on the Representation of Grammatical Relations. Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana University Linguistics Club. 1–24Google Scholar
Mohanan, K. P. 1982. “Grammatical Relations and Clause Structure in Malayalam.” In , ed., The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. 504–589Google Scholar
, and . 2000. “What Does it Take to be a Dative Subject?”Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18: 373–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 1982. “Syntactic Relations in Western Muskogean: A Typological Perspective.”Language 58: 81–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murasugi, Kumiko G. 1992. “Crossing and Nested Paths: NP Movement in Accusative and Ergative Languages”. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT
. 1998. Constructive Case: Evidence from Australian Languages. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI PublicationsGoogle Scholar
Perlmutter, David M. 1978. “Impersonal Passives and the Unaccusative Hypothesis.” BLS 4
, ed., 1983. Studies in Relational Grammar, vol. I. Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
Perlmutter, David M. 1984. “The Inadequacy of Some Monostratal Theories of Passive.” In and , eds., Studies in Relational Gramma, vol. II. Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
Perlmutter, David M., and Paul M. Postal 1983. “Towards a Universal Characterization of Passivization.” In , ed., Studies in Relational Grammar, vol. I. Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
, ed., 1979. Ergativity: Towards a Theory of Grammatical Relations. New York: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
, and . 1994. Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI PublicationsGoogle Scholar
1997. “The Morpholexical Nature of English to Contraction.”Language 73: 79–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1997. Syntactic Theory and the Structure of English: A Minimalist Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rappaport Hovav, Malka, and Beth Levin (2003) “Deconstructing Thematic Hierarchies.” Ms., The Hebrew University of Jerusalem and Stanford University
. 1986. “Null Objects in Italian and the Theory of pro.”Linguistic Inquiry 17: 501–557Google Scholar
Sadler, Louisa. 1999. “Non-Distributive Features in Welsh Coordination.” In Miriam Butt and Tracy Holloway King, eds., Proceedings of the LFG 99 Conference, The University of Manchester. Online: CSLI Publications. http://cslipublications.stanford.edu/LFG/4/lfg99.html
, and . 1991. “An Integrated Theory of Complement Control.”Language 67: 63–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schachter, Paul 1976. “The Subject in Philippine Languages: Topic, Actor, Actor-Topic, or None of the Above.” In , ed., Subject and Topic. New York: Academic Press. 493–518Google Scholar
Schachter, Paul 1987. “Tagalog.” In , ed., The World's Major Languages. New York: Oxford University Press. 936–958Google Scholar
Seiter, William J. 1983. “Subject–Direct Object Raising in Niuean.” In , ed., Studies in Relational Grammar, vol. I. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 317–359Google Scholar
Sells, Peter. 1984. “Syntax and Semantics of Resumptive Pronouns”. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst
. 1988. “Complementizer-Cliticization in Hebrew and the Empty Category Principle.”Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6: 191–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, Jane. 1983. “Aspects of Warlpiri Morphology and Syntax”. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT
, and . 1983. “Control and Obviation in Warlpiri.”Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 1: 49–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1987. “The Variable Status of complementizer-Trace Phenomena.”Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 5: 33–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 1999. “Empty Subjects in Finnish and Hebrew.”Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 17: 613–671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 1997. Syntax: Structure, Meaning, and Function. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 1998. “Syntactic Ergativity in Balinese: An Argument Structure Based Theory.”Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 16: 387–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woolford, Ellen. 1997. “Four-Way Case Systems: Ergative, Nominative, Objective and Accusative.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory. 181–227
Ziv, Yael 1976. “On the Reanalysis of Grammatical Terms in Hebrew Possessive Constructions.” In , ed., Studies in Modern Hebrew Syntax and Semantics: The Transformational-Generative Approach. Amsterdam: North-HollandGoogle Scholar