Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-669899f699-7xsfk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-25T01:19:32.149Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Creativity, Pedagogic Partnerships, and the Improvisatory Space of Teaching

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

By
Pamela Burnard
Edited by
R. Keith Sawyer
Pamela Burnard
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
R. Keith Sawyer
Affiliation:
Washington University, St Louis
Get access

Summary

There is a tension between two prominent agendas for school reform: the accountability agenda and the creativity agenda (see Burnard, 2008). Under the accountability agenda, teachers are required to measure and test students, to report using mandated standards and systems, and to teach in state sanctioned ways. Under the creativity agenda, teachers are expected to act effortlessly, fluidly, to take risks, be adventurous, and to develop pedagogy and classroom creativity in order to develop their own knowledge and skills as creative professionals. They are expected to develop creative learners who can succeed in a twenty-first-century economy that rewards creativity and innovation.

The accountability agenda makes it difficult for teachers to work more creatively. Teachers get overwhelmed by a constant barrage of accountability demands (standards, tests, targets, and tables) by government. There is general agreement that governments are increasingly taking control of the teaching profession (Alexander, 2004). Teachers are expected to perform in specific and regulated ways. In contrast, the creativity agenda encourages teachers to take risks, be adventurous, and explore creativity themselves. Yet, what constitutes creativity in education remains ambiguous.

Type
Chapter
Information
Structure and Improvisation in Creative Teaching , pp. 51 - 72
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Alexander, R. (2004). Still no pedagogy? Principle, pragmatism and compliance in primary education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 31(1), 7–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, R. (2008). Essays on pedagogy. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ball, S. J. (2003). The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Educational Policy, 18(2), 215–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berliner, P. (1994). Thinking in jazz: The infinite art of improvisation. Chicago: University of Chicago.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, B. (1996). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Bransford, J., Brown, A., & Cocking, R. (1999). Editorial introduction. How people learn, mind, brain and school. Joint Report to the Committees on Developments in the Science of Learning, on Learning Research and Educational Practice and the Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Washington DC: National Research Council.Google Scholar
Burnard, P. (2008). The impact of productive tensions between policy and practice on creativity in education. UNESCO Observatory E-Journal, Multi-Disciplinary Research in the Arts.
Burnard, P. & Maddock, M. (2007). Pupil and teacher perceptions of the nature of artist pedagogy and its impact on school change.
Burnard, P. & Swann, M. (2010). Pupil perceptions of learning with artists: A new order of experience?Thinking Skills and Creativity, 5(2), 70–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnard, P. & White, J. (2008). Creativity and performativity: Counterpoints in British and Australian education. British Educational Research Journal, Special Issue on Creativity and Performativity in Teaching and Learning 34(5), 667–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CapeUK, . (2005). Creative space: Collaborative approaches to science learning in schools. CapeUK.
Cochrane, P. (2008). Making space for creativity: How teachers and school leaders in England navigate mixed policy messages Observatory E-Journal, Multi-Disciplinary Research in the Arts, Issue 3
Cochrane, P., Craft, A., & Dillon, P. (2007). King James 1 Community College creative partnerships project: Writing for radio. Durham: Creative Partnerships Durham/Sunderland (in collaboration with Exeter University).
Cochrane, P., Jeffery, G., & Price, D. (2007). Creativepartnerships and the further education sector. London: Creative Partnerships Learning Team.Google Scholar
Cocker, J. (1964). Improvising jazz. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Craft, A. (2005). Creativity in schools: Tensions and dilemmas. London: Routledge/Falmer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craft, A. (2006) Creativity and wisdom?Cambridge Journal of Education, 36(3), 336–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Creativity, Culture and Education (2009). Homepage. Retrieved Jan. 29, 2009 from
Creative Partnerships (2005a). First findings policy, practice and progress: A review of creative learning 2002–2004. London; Arts Council England.Google Scholar
Creative Partnerships (2005b). Creative Partnership Website. Retrieved Feb. 29, 2005 from
Day, C. & Saunders, L. (2006) ‘What being a teacher (really) means’, Forum 48(3), 265–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DCMS (2001). Culture and Creativity: The Next Ten Years. Green Paper. London: DCMS. Accessed online September 14, 2009 at:
DCMS (2004). Available online at: (accessed September 4, 2004).
Galton, M. (2008). Creative practitioners in schools and classrooms. London: Creative Partnerships, Arts Council England.Google Scholar
Galton, M. (2010) Going with the flow or back to normal? The impact of creative practitioners in schools and classrooms, Research Papers in Education, 25 (4)355–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffith, M. & Woolf, F. (2009). The Nottingham Apprenticeship Model: schools in partnership with artists and creative practitioners. British Eductional Research Journal, 35(4), 557–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, C. & Thomson, P. (2007). Creative partnerships? Cultural policy and inclusive arts practice in one primary school. British Educational Research Journal, 33(3), 315–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, C., Thomson, P., & Russell, L. (2007) Teaching like an artist: The pedagogic identities and practices of artists in schools. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 28(5), 605–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeffery, G. (2005). The creative college: Building a successful learning culture in the arts. Stoke-on-Trent: Trentham.Google Scholar
Jeffrey, B. (2006). Creative teaching and learning: Towards a common discourse and practice. Cambridge Journal of Education, 36(3), 399–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, D., Jeffery, G., & Walsh, A. (2008). Mediated conversations at a cultural trading post: A study of the TAPP and Eastfeast PPD Programmes in support of teachers and artists. Available at
Ledgard, A. (2006). Fair exchange: Shared professional development and reflective action. In Burnard, P. and Hennessy, S. (Eds.), Reflective practices in arts education (pp. 169–182). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Loi, D. & Dillon, P. (2006). Adaptive educational environments as creative spaces. Cambridge Journal of Education, 36(3), 363–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loveless, A. (2008) Creative learning and new technology? A provocation paper in J.Sefton-Green, (Ed) Creative learning (pp. 61–73). London: Arts council England.
Maddock, M., Drummond, M. J., Korelek, B., & Nathan, I. (2007) Doing school differently: Creative practitioners at work. Education 3–13, 35(1), 47–58.Google Scholar
Maddock, M. & Sapsed, R.withDrummond, M. J. (2008). Igniting a fuse: Developing the creative practice of primary educators. Tendring: Creative Partnerships.Google Scholar
Nardone, P.L. (1996). The experience of improvisation in music: A phenomeno logical psychological analysis. Unpublished PhD. Dissertation, Saybrook Institute. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor: UMI.
National Advisory Committee on Creative and Cultural Education (NACCCE) (1999). All our futures: Creativity, culture and education. London: Department for Education and Employment.Google Scholar
National College of School Leadership (NCSL) (2002). Leading the creative school: A leading edge seminar, November, Nottingham.
Pike, A. (1974). A phenomenology of jazz. Journal of Jazz Studies, 2(1), 88–94.Google Scholar
Pope, M., Fuller, M., Boulter, C., Denicolo, P., & Wells, P. (1999). Partnership and collaboration in teacher education. In Lang, M., Olson, J., Hansen, H., and Bünder, W. (Eds.), Changing schools/changing practices: Perspectives on educational reform and teacher professionalism. Louvain, Brussels: Garant.Google Scholar
Pringle, E. (2008). Artists’ perspectives on art practice and pedagogy. In Sefton-Green, J. (Ed.). Creative learning (pp. 41–50). England: Arts Council.Google Scholar
Qualifications and Curriculum Authority (2005). Creativity: Find it, promote it : A Teacher’s guide to using the video. London: DfEE/QCA.Google Scholar
Sawyer, R. K. (2004). Creative teaching: Collaborative discussion as disciplined improvisation. Educational Researcher, 23(2), 12–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Sefton-Green, J. (Ed.). (2008). Creative learning. London: Creative Partnerships, Arts Council.
Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solomon, L. (1986). Improvisation II. Perspectives in New Music. 24, 224–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Triantafyllaki, A. & Burnard, P. (2010). Creativity and arts-based knowledge creation in diverse educational partnership practices: Lessons from two case studies in rethinking traditional spaces for learning. UNESCO Observatory E-Journal, Multi-Disciplinary Research in the Arts, 1(15). .Google Scholar
Upitis, R. (2006). Challenges for artists and teachers working in partnership. In Burnard, P. and Hennessy, S. (Eds.), Reflective practices in arts education (pp. 55–68). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woods, P. & Jeffrey, B. (1996) Teachable Moments: The Art of Creative Teaching in Primary Schools. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×