Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T08:21:52.134Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2023

Deborah Beck
Deborah Beck
Affiliation:
University of Texas, Austin
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Stories of Similes in Greek and Roman Epic , pp. 259 - 274
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Allen, T. W. 1917–19. Homeri Opera Volumes III–IV (Odyssey). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Erbse, H., ed. 1969–83. Scholia Graeca in Homeri Iliadem (Scholia Vetera). 6 vols. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Monro, D. B., and Allen, T. W.. 1920. Homeri Opera Volumes I–II (Iliad). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mynors, R. A. B. 1969. P. Vergili Maronis Opera. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Oswald, A. 2011. Memorial: A Version of Homer’s Iliad. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Pontani, F., ed. 2007. Scholia Graeca in Odysseam. 4 vols. Rome: Edizioni di storia e letteratura.Google Scholar
Race, W. H., ed. 2008. Apollonius Rhodius Argonautica. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rouse, W. H. D., ed. 1924. Lucretius on the Nature of Things. Revised by M. F. Smith. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tarrant, R. J., ed. 2004. P. Ovidi Nasonis Metamorphoses. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
van der Valk, M., ed. 1971–87. Eustathii Archiepiscopi Thessalonicensis Commentarii ad Homeri Iliadem Pertinentes. 4 vols. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Wendel, C., ed. 1958. Scholia in Apollonium Rhodium Vetera. 2nd ed. Berlin: Weidmann.Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

Addison, C. 2001. “‘So Stretched Out Huge in Length’: Reading the Extended Simile.” Style 35 (3): 498–516.Google Scholar
Alden, M. 2005. “Lions in Paradise: Lion Similes in the Iliad and the Lion Cubs of IL. 18.318–22.” Classical Quarterly n.s. 55 (2): 335–42.Google Scholar
Alden, M. 2017. Para-Narratives in the Odyssey: Stories in the Frame. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Alexiou, M. 1974. The Ritual Lament in Greek Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Allan, R. J. 2019a. “Construal and Immersion: A Cognitive Linguistic Approach to Homeric Immersivity.” In Meineck, P., Short, W. M., and Devereaux, J., eds. The Routledge Handbook of Classics and Cognitive Theory, pp. 59–78. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Allan, R. J. 2019b. “Narrative Immersion: Some Linguistic and Narratological Aspects.” In Grethlein, J., Huitink, L., and Tagliabue, A., eds. Experience, Narrative, and Criticism in Ancient Greece: Under the Spell of Stories, pp. 15–35. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allan, R. J., de Jong, I. J. F., and de Jonge, C. C.. 2017. “From Enargeia to Immersion: The Ancient Roots of a Modern Concept.” Style 51 (1): 34–51.Google Scholar
Allan, W. 2012. Homer: The Iliad. London: Bristol Classical Press.Google Scholar
Alverson, H. 1994. Semantics and Experience: Universal Metaphors of Time in English, Mandarin, Hindi, and Sesotho. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Amory, A. 1963. “The Reunion of Odysseus and Penelope.” In Taylor, C. H. Jr., ed. Essays on the Odyssey: Selected Modern Criticism, pp. 100–36. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, M., Cairns, D., and Sprevak, M., eds. 2019. Distributed Cognition in Classical Antiquity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, W. S. 1968. “Pastor Aeneas: On Pastoral Themes in the Aeneid.” Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 99: 1–17.Google Scholar
Anderson, W. S., ed. 1997. Ovid’s Metamorphoses Books 1–5. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Ardizzoni, A., ed. 1967. Le argonautiche libro I. Rome: Edizioni dell’Ateneo.Google Scholar
Ardizzoni, A., 1976. “Il pianto di Medea e la similitudine della giovane vedova.” Giornale Italiano di Filologia ns 7 (XXVIII) (1): 233–40.Google Scholar
Austin, R. G., ed. 1971. P. Vergili Maronis Aeneidos Liber Primus. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Bakker, E. J. 1993. “Discourse and Performance: Involvement, Visualization, and ‘Presence’ in Homeric Poetry.” Classical Antiquity 12 (1): 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakker, E. J. 2001. “Similes, Augment, and the Language of Immediacy.” In Watson, J., ed. Speaking Volumes: Orality and Literacy in the Greek and Roman World, pp. 1–23. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Baltes, M. 1983. “Zur Eigenart und Funktion von Gleichnissen im 16. Buch der Ilias.” Antike und Abendland 29 (1): 36–48.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. 2002. “Narrative Technique and Narratology in the Metamorphoses.” In Hardie, P., ed. The Cambridge Companion to Ovid, pp. 180–99. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A., ed. 2005. Ovidio Metamorfosi. Vol. I, Libri I–II. Rome: Fondazione Lorenzo Valla.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A., 2009. “Senatus consultum de Lycaone: Concili degli dèi e immaginazione politica, nelle Metamorfosi di Ovidio.” Materiali e discussioni per l’analisi dei testi classici 61: 117–45.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A., 2015. Homeric Effects in Vergil’s Narrative. Translated by Marchesi, I. and Fox, M.. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A., and Rosati, G., eds. 2007. Ovidio Metamorfosi. Vol. II, Libri III–IV. Rome: Fondazione Lorenzo Valla.Google Scholar
Barker, E. T. E., and Christensen, J. P.. 2014. “Odysseus’ Nostos and the Odyssey’s Nostoi: Rivalry within the Epic Cycle.” Philologia Antiqua 7: 85–110.Google Scholar
Barrett, W. S., ed. 1992. Euripides Hippolytos. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Bassett, S. E. 1921. “The Function of the Homeric Simile.” Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 52: 132–47.Google Scholar
Batstone, W. 1997. “Virgilian Didaxis: Value and Meaning in the Georgics.” In Martindale, C., ed. The Cambridge Companion to Virgil, pp. 125–44. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Battezzato, L., ed. 2018. Euripides Hecuba. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Beck, D. 2005a. Homeric Conversation. Vol. 14, Hellenic Studies. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Beck, D. 2005b. “Odysseus: Storyteller, Narrator, Poet?” Classical Philology 100 (3): 213–27.Google Scholar
Beck, D. 2012. Speech Presentation in Homeric Epic. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Beck, D. 2014a. “Expressive Narration in Apollonius’ Argonautica.” Syllecta Classica 25–33.Google Scholar
Beck, D. 2014b. “The First Simile of the Aeneid.” Vergilius 60: 1–17.Google Scholar
Beck, D. 2014c. “Simile Structure in Homeric Epic and Vergil’s Aeneid.” In Scodel, R., ed. Between Orality and Literacy: Communication and Adaptation in Antiquity, pp. 244–66. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Beekes, R. 2010. Etymological Dictionary of Greek. 2 vols. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Beye, C. R. 1969. “Jason as Love-hero in Apollonius’ Argonautika.” Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 10 (1): 31–55.Google Scholar
Beye, C. R. 1984. “Repeated Similes in the Homeric Poems.” In Rigsby, K. J., ed. Studies Presented to Sterling Down on His Eightieth Birthday, pp. 7–13. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Biggs, T. 2020. “Naval Battles in Greek and Roman Epic.” In Reitz, C. and Finkmann, S., eds. Part 1, Structures of Epic Poetry II, pp. 317–53. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bömer, F., ed. 1969. P. Ovidius Naso Metamorphosen Buch I–III. Heidelberg: Carl Winter Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
Bömer, F., ed. 1976. P. Ovidius Naso Metamorphosen Buch IV–V. Heidelberg: Carl Winter Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
Bömer, F., ed. 1980. P. Ovidius Naso Metamorphosen Buch X–XI. Heidelberg: Carl Winter Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
Bonnafé, A. 1983. “Quelques remarques a propos des comparaisons homériques de l’’Iliad’.” Revue de Philologie, de Littérature et d’Histoire Anciennes 57: 79–97.Google Scholar
Boss, P. 2016. “The Context and Process of Theory Development: The Story of Ambiguous Loss.” Journal of Family Theory & Review 8 (3): 269–86.Google Scholar
Bowie, A. 2008. “Aeneas Narrator.” Proceedings of the Virgil Society 26: 41–51.Google Scholar
Boyd, B. W. 2017. Ovid’s Homer: Authority, Repetition, and Reception. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Briggs, W. W. Jr. 1980. Narrative and Simile from the Georgics in the Aeneid. Vol. 58, Mnemosyne Supplements, 58. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Briquel, D. 1995. “Des comparaisons animales homériques aux guerriers-fauves indo-européens.” Kernos 8: 31–39.Google Scholar
Brügger, C., ed. 2018. Homer’s Iliad The Basel Commentary: Book XVI. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Brunner, T. F. 1966. “The Function of the Simile in Ovid’s ‘Metamorphoses.’” Classical Journal 61 (8): 354–63.Google Scholar
Cairns, D. L. 1993. AIDOS: The Psychology and Ethics of Honour and Shame in Ancient Greek Literature. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Cairns, F. 1989. Virgil’s Augustan Epic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carspecken, J. F. 1952. “Apollonius Rhodius and the Homeric Epic.” Yale Classical Studies 13: 35–143.Google Scholar
Carston, R., and Wearing, C.. 2011. “Metaphor, Hyperbole and Simile: A Pragmatic Approach.” Language and Cognition 3–2: 283–312.Google Scholar
Christensen, J. P. 2015. “Trojan Politics and the Assemblies of Iliad 7.” Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 55 (1): 25–51.Google Scholar
Christensen, J. P. 2019, August 17. Scarcity, Precarity, and Simile: Reading the Iliad. In Sententiae Antiquae. [Blog post. Retrieved from https://sententiaeantiquae.com/tag/scarcity/].Google Scholar
Christensen, J. P. 2020. The Many-Minded Man: The Odyssey, Psychology, and the Therapy of Epic. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Christiansë, Y. 2008. “Narratives.” In Darity, W. A. Jr., ed. International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences 5, pp. 370–72. Detroit: MI: Macmillan Reference USA.Google Scholar
Clare, R. J. 2002. The Path of the Argo: Language, Imagery and Narrative in the Argonautica of Apollonius Rhodius. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clarke, M. 1995. “Between Lions and Men: Images of the Hero in the Iliad.” Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 36 (2): 137–59.Google Scholar
Clauss, J. J. 1993. The Best of the Argonauts: The Redefinition of the Epic Hero in Book 1 of Apollonius’ Argonautica. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Clay, J. S. 2011. Homer’s Trojan Theater: Space, Vision, and Memory in the Iliad. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Coffey, M. 1961. “The Subject Matter of Vergil’s Similes.” Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 8: 63–75.Google Scholar
Conington, J., and Nettleship, H.. 1963. The Works of Virgil. Vol. III, Containing the Last Six Books of the Aeneid. Hildesheim: Georg Olms.Google Scholar
Conte, G. B. 1986. The Rhetoric of Imitation: Genre and Poetic Memory in Virgil and Other Latin Poets. Translated by Segal, C.. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Cook, E. 1999. “‘Active’ and ‘Passive’ Heroics in the ‘Odyssey.’” Classical World 93 (2): 149–67.Google Scholar
Cuenca, M. J. 2015. “Beyond Compare: Similes in Interaction.” Review of Cognitive Linguistics 13 (1): 140–66.Google Scholar
Currie, B. 2016. Homer’s Allusive Art. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cusset, C. 2012. “The Metapoetics of Simile in Hellenistic Poetry.” La parola del passato: la rivista di studi antichi 67 (383): 104–17.Google Scholar
Cuypers, M. P. 1997. Apollonius Rhodius Argonautica. 2.1–310, A Commentary. Leiden: Rijksuniversiteit te Leiden.Google Scholar
Cuypers, M. P. 2005. “Interactional Particles and Narrative Voice in Apollonius.” In Harder, A. and Cuypers, M., eds. Beginning from Apollo: Studies in Apollonius Rhodius and the Argonautic Tradition, pp. 35–69. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
Dancygier, B., and Sweetser, E.. 2014. Figurative Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Danek, G. 1998. Epos und Zitat: Studien zu den Quellen der Odyssee. Vol. 22, Wiener Studien. Vienna: Verlag der österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Danek, G. 2006. “Die Gleichnisse der Ilias und der Dichter Homer.” In Bakker, E. J., Montanari, F., and Rengakos, A., eds. La poésie épique grecque: métamorphoses d’un genre littéraire, pp. 41–71. Geneva: Fondation Hardt.Google Scholar
de Jong, I. J. F. 1985. “Fokalisation und die homerischen Gleichnisse.” Mnemosyne 38 (3): 257–80.Google Scholar
de Jong, I. J. F. 1992. “The Subjective Style in Odysseus’ Wanderings.” Classical Quarterly 42 (1): 1–11.Google Scholar
de Jong, I. J. F. 1993. “Studies in Homeric Denomination.” Mnemosyne 46 (3): 289–306.Google Scholar
de Jong, I. J. F. 2001. A Narratological Commentary on the Odyssey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
de Jong, I. J. F. 2004. Narrators and Focalizers: The Presentation of the Story in the Iliad, 2nd ed. Bristol: Bristol Classical Press.Google Scholar
de Jong, I. J. F., ed. 2012. Homer Iliad Book XXII. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Desderi, E. 2012. “Prismatica Penelope.” In Casarino, S. and Raschieri, A. A., eds. Figure e autori dell’epica: atti del convegno, Sala Ghislieri, Mondovì (CN) 8–11 aprile 2011, pp. 171–82. Rome: Aracne.Google Scholar
di Benedetto, V. 1987. “Formularità interna e paragoni nell’Iliade.” Rivista di Filologia e di Istruzione Classica 115: 257–87.Google Scholar
Dimakopoulou, A. 2010. χλωρὶς ἀηδών: pâle rossignol. Paris: Apolis éditions.Google Scholar
Duchemin, J. 1960. “Aspects pastoraux de la poésie homérique: les comparaisons dans l’Iliade.” Revue des études grecques 73: 362–415.Google Scholar
Edwards, M. W. 1991. The Iliad: A Commentary. Vol. V, Books 17–20. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Effe, B. 2001. “The Similes of Apollonius Rhodius: Intertextuality as Epic Innovation.” In Papanghelis, T. D. and Rengakos, A., eds. A Companion to Apollonius Rhodius, pp. 147–69. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Eisenberger, H. 1973. Studien zur Odyssee. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner Verlag GMBH.Google Scholar
Elliott, J. 2008. “Ennian Epic and Ennian Tragedy in the Language of the Aeneid: Aeneas’ Generic Wanderings and the Construction of the Latin Literary Past.” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 104: 241–72.Google Scholar
Elliott, J. 2013. Ennius and the Architecture of the Annales. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Elmer, D. F. 2013. The Poetics of Consent: Collective Decision Making and the Iliad. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Emlyn-Jones, C. 1984. “The Reunion of Penelope and Odysseus.” Greece & Rome 31 (1): 1–18.Google Scholar
Fantuzzi, M., and Hunter, R. L.. 2004. Tradition and Innovation in Hellenistic Poetry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. 1983. “The Taciturnity of Aeneas.” Classical Quarterly 33 (1): 204–19.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. 2014. “First Similes in Epic.” Transactions of the American Philological Association 144 (2): 189–228.Google Scholar
Feichtinger, B. 2013. “Gewaltvolles Begehren: Eros und Macht in Ovids Metamorphosen.” In Harich-Schwarzbauer, H. and Honold, A., eds. Carmen perpetuum: Ovids ‘Metamorphosen’ in der Weltliteratur, pp. 43–64. Basel: Schwabe Verlag.Google Scholar
Fenik, B. 1968. Typical Battle Scenes in the Iliad: Studies in the Narrative Techniques of Homeric Battle Description. Vol. 21, Hermes Einzelschriften. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Fenik, B. 1974. Studies in the Odyssey. Vol. 30, Hermes Einzelschriften. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Finglass, P. J., ed. 2007. Sophocles Electra. Vol. 44, Cambridge Classical Texts and Commentaries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Finkelberg, M. 1995. “Odysseus and the Genus ‘Hero.’” Greece & Rome 42 (1): 1–14.Google Scholar
Fludernik, M. 1993. The Fictions of Language and the Languages of Fiction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Foley, H. P. 1978. “‘Reverse Similes’ and Sex Roles in the Odyssey.” Arethusa 11: 7–26.Google Scholar
Foley, J. M., and Arft, J.. 2015. “The Epic Cycle and Oral Tradition.” In Fantuzzi, M. and Tsagalis, C., eds. The Greek Epic Cycle and Its Ancient Reception, pp. 78–95. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Forte, A. 2021. “Enumeration and Embodiment in Homeric Repetition.” In Beck, D., ed. Repetition, Communication, and Meaning in the Ancient World, pp. 44–71. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Fowler, D. P. 1987. “Vergil on Killing Virgins.” In Whitby, L. M., Hardie, P. R., and Whitby, M., eds. Homo Viator: Classical Essays for John Bramble, pp. 185–99. Bristol: Bristol Classical Press.Google Scholar
Fowler, D. P. 1991. “Narrate and Describe: The Problem of Ekphrasis.” Journal of Roman Studies 81: 25–35.Google Scholar
Fowler, R. L. 2018. “Review of Homer’s Allusive Art by Bruno Currie.” American Journal of Philology 139 (3): 511–14.Google Scholar
Frank, J. 1990. “You Call That a Rhetorical Question?” Journal of Pragmatics 14: 723–38.Google Scholar
Fränkel, H. 1921. Die homerischen Gleichnisse. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Fränkel, H. 1952. “Apollonius Rhodius as a Narrator in Argonautica 2.1–140.” Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 83: 144–55.Google Scholar
Fränkel, H. 1968. Noten zu den Argonautika des Apollonios. Munich: C. H. Beck.Google Scholar
Fraser, P. M. 1972. Ptolemaic Alexandria. 3 vols. Vol. I, Text. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Friedrich, P., and Redfield, J.. 1978. “Speech as a Personality Symbol: The Case of Achilles.” Language 54 (2): 263–88.Google Scholar
Friedrich, R. 1981. “On the Compositional Use of Similes in the Odyssey.” American Journal of Philology 102 (2): 120–37.Google Scholar
Friedrich, W.-H. 1956. “Episches Unwetter.” In Erbse, H., ed. Festschrift Bruno Snell zum 60. Geburtstag, pp. 77–87. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
Fusillo, M. 1985. Il tempo delle Argonautiche: Un’analisi del racconto in Apollonio Rodio. Rome: Edizione dell’Ateneo.Google Scholar
Gaca, K. L. 2008. “Reinterpreting the Homeric Simile of Iliad 16.7–11: The Girl and Her Mother in Ancient Greek Warfare.” American Journal of Philology 129 (2): 145–71.Google Scholar
Gale, M. 2007. “Lucretius and Previous Poetic Traditions.” In Gillespie, S. and Hardie, P., eds. The Cambridge Companion to Lucretius, pp. 59–75. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Galinsky, G. K. 1996. Augustan Culture: An Interpretive Introduction. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Garvie, A. F., ed. 1994. Homer Odyssey Books VI–VIII. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. Jr., Lima, P. L. C., and Francozo, E.. 2004. “Metaphor Is Grounded in Embodied Experience.” Journal of Pragmatics 36: 1189–1210.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. Jr., and Colston, H. L.. 2012. Interpreting Figurative Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Giora, R. , Fein, O., Kronrod, A. et al. 2004. “Weapons of Mass Distraction: Optimal Innovation and Pleasure Ratings.” Metaphor and Symbol 19 (2): 115–41.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. 1991. The Poet’s Voice: Essays on Poetics and Greek Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grethlein, J. 2017. Die Odyssee: Homer und die Kunst des Erzählens. Munich: C. H. Beck.Google Scholar
Grethlein, J., Huitink, L., and Tagliabue, A.. 2019. “Introduction.” In Grethlein, J., Huitink, L., and Tagliabue, A., eds. Experience, Narrative, and Criticism in Ancient Greece: Under the Spell of Stories, pp. 1–12. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Griffin, J. 1977. “The Epic Cycle and the Uniqueness of Homer.” Journal of Hellenic Studies 97: 39–53.Google Scholar
Griffin, J. 1980. Homer on Life and Death. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Griffin, J. 1986. “Homeric Words and Speakers.” Journal of Hellenic Studies 106: 36–57.Google Scholar
Hainsworth, J. B. 1993. The Iliad: A Commentary. Vol. III, Books 9–12. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Harder, A., ed. 2012. Callimachus Aetia: Introduction, Text, Translation, and Commentary. 2 vols. Vol. 1, Introduction, Text, and Translation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. R. 1986. Virgil’s Aeneid: Cosmos and Imperium. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. R., ed. 1994. Virgil Aeneid Book IX. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. R., 1998. Virgil. Vol. 28, Greece & Rome New Surveys in the Classics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. J. 1988. “Vergil on Kingship: The First Simile of the Aeneid.” Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 34: 55–59.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. J., ed. 1991. Vergil Aeneid 10. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. J., 2019. “Force, Frequency and Focalisation: The Function of Similes in the Battle-Narrative of Vergil, Aeneid 10.” In van Gils, L., Jong, I. D., and Kroon, C., eds. Textual Strategies in Ancient War Narrative: Thermopylae, Cannae and Beyond, pp. 359–75. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Haubold, J. 2000. Homer’s People: Epic Poetry and Social Formation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Haught, C. 2013. “A Tale of Two Tropes: How Metaphor and Simile Differ.” Metaphor and Symbol 28 (4): 254–74.Google Scholar
Henry, J. 1873. Aeneidea or Critical, Exegetical, and Aesthetical Remarks on the Aeneis, Vol. I. London: Williams and Norgate.Google Scholar
Hershkowitz, D. 1998. The Madness of Epic: Reading Insanity from Homer to Statius. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Heubeck, A., West, S., and Hainsworth, J.. 1990. A Commentary on Homer’s Odyssey, Vol. I, Introduction and Books I–VIII. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Heyne, C. G. 1800. P. Virgilius Maro, Vol. 4: Aeneidis Libri IX–XII. Lipsiae: Caspari Fritsch.Google Scholar
Hill, D. E., ed. 1985. Ovid Metamorphoses I–IV. Oak Park: Bolchazy-Carducci.Google Scholar
Hinds, S. 1998. Allusion and Intertext: Dynamics of Appropriation in Roman Poetry. In Feeney, D. and Hinds, S., eds, Roman Literature and Its Contexts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Holzberg, N. 1998. “Ter Quinque Volumina as Carmen Perpetuum: The Division into Books in Ovid’s Metamorphoses.” Materiali e discussioni per l’analisi dei testi classici 40: 77–98.Google Scholar
Holzberg, N. 2002. Ovid: The Poet and His Work. Translated by Goshgarian, G. M.. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hopkinson, N., ed. 2000. Ovid Metamorphoses Book XIII. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hornsby, R. A. 1970. Patterns of Action in the Aeneid: An Interpretation of Vergil’s Epic Similes. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press.Google Scholar
Horsfall, N. 1987. “‘Non Viribus Aequis’: Some Problems in Virgil’s Battle-Scenes.” Greece & Rome 34 (1): 48–55.Google Scholar
Horsfall, N. 1990. “Virgil and the Illusory Footnote.” Papers of the Leeds International Latin Seminar 6: 49–63.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. L., ed. 1989. Apollonius of Rhodes Argonautica Book III. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. L., 1993. The Argonautica of Apollonius: Literary Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. L., 2006. The Shadow of Callimachus: Studies in the Reception of Hellenistic Poetry at Rome. In Feeney, D. and Hinds, S., eds. Roman Literature and Its Contexts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. L., ed. 2015. Apollonius of Rhodes Argonautica Book IV. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, G. O. 1988. Hellenistic Poetry. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, G. O. 2006. “Hellenistic Epic and Homeric Form.” In Clarke, M. J., Currie, B. G. F., and Lyne, R. O. A. M., eds. Epic Interactions: Perspectives on Homer, Virgil, and the Epic Tradition: Presented to Jasper Griffin by Former Pupils, pp. 105–29. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, G. O. 2017. “Repetition, Range, and Attention: The Iliad.” In Tsagalis, C. and Markantonatos, A., eds. The Winnowing Oar – New Perspectives in Homeric Studies, pp. 144–70. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ingalls, W. B. 1998. “Attitudes toward Children in the Iliad.” Echos du Monde Classique 42 n.s. (17): 13–34.Google Scholar
Innes, D. 2003. “Metaphor, Simile, and Allegory as Ornaments of Style.” In Boys-Stones, G. R., ed. Metaphor, Allegory, and the Classical Tradition, pp. 7–27. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Iser, W. 1974. The Implied Reader: Patterns of Communication in Prose Fiction from Bunyan to Beckett. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Israel, M., Harding, J. R., and Tobin, V.. 2004. “On Simile.” In Achard, M. and Kemmer, S., eds. Language, Culture, and Mind, pp. 123–35. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Janko, R. 1992. The Iliad: A Commentary. Vol. IV, Books 13–16. Edited by Kirk, G. S.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, W. R. 2015. Darkness Visible. Chicago: University of Chicago Press (original publication University of California Press, 1976).Google Scholar
Katz, J. T. 2014. “Inherited Poetics.” In Bakker, E. J., ed. A Companion to the Ancient Greek Language, pp. 357–69. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Katz, M. A. 1991. Penelope’s Renown: Meaning and Indeterminacy in the Odyssey. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Keith, A. M. 2002. “Ovid on Vergilian War Narrative.” Vergilius 48: 105–122.Google Scholar
Kelly, A. 2008. “Performance and Rivalry: Homer, Odysseus, and Hesiod.” In Revermann, M. and Wilson, P., eds. Performance, Iconography, Reception: Studies in Honour of Oliver Taplin, pp. 177–203. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kelly, A. 2014. “Homeric Battle Narrative and the Ancient Near East.” In Cairns, D. and Scodel, R., eds. Defining Greek Narrative, pp. 29–54. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Kirk, G. S. 1990. The Iliad: A Commentary. Vol. II, Books 5–8. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Knauer, G. N. 1964. Die Aeneis und Homer: Studien zur poetischen Technik Vergils mit Listen der Homerzitate in der Aeneis. Vol. 7, Hypomnemata. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Knight, V. 1995. The Renewal of Epic: Responses to Homer in the Argonautica of Apollonius. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Knox, P. E. 1986. Ovid’s Metamorphoses and the Traditions of Augustan Poetry. Vol. 11, Cambridge Philological Society Supplementary Volumes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Korpanty, J. 1985. “Furor in der augusteischen Literatur.” Klio 67 (1): 248–57.Google Scholar
Krischer, T. 1971. Formale Konventionen der homerischen Epik. Vol. 56, Zetemata. Munich: C. H. Beck’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung.Google Scholar
Laird, A. 1999. Powers of Expression, Expressions of Power: Speech Presentation and Latin Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Latacz, J., and Bierl, A., eds. 2015. Homer’s Iliad: The Basel Commentary: Prolegomena. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Leaf, W., ed. 2010. Homer: The Iliad. Vol. 2, Books 13–24, Cambridge Library Collection. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lee, D. J. N. 1964. The Similes of the Iliad and the Odyssey Compared. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
Leigh, M. 2010. “Early Roman Epic and the Maritime Moment.” Classical Philology 105 (3): 265–80.Google Scholar
Létoublon, F. 2016. “Entre lions et loups: à propos des comparaisons homériques.” Gaia 19: 127–50.Google Scholar
Létoublon, F. 2018. “Les figures selon les scholies à Homère.” In Dubel, S., Favreau-Linder, A.-M., and Oudot, E., eds. Homère rhétorique: Études de réception antique, pp. 121–39. Turnhout: Brepols Publishers.Google Scholar
Levin, D. N. 1971. Apollonius’ Argonautica Re-examined: The Neglected First and Second Books. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Lloyd, M. 2004. “The Politeness of Achilles: Off-Record Conversation Strategies in Homer and the Meaning of ‘Kertomia.’” Journal of Hellenic Studies 124: 75–89.Google Scholar
Lonsdale, S. H. 1990. Creatures of Speech: Lion, Herding, and Hunting Similes in the Iliad. In Heitsch, E. and Koenen, L., eds. Vol. 5, Beiträge zur Altertumskunde. Stuttgart: Teubner.Google Scholar
Lyne, R. O. A. M. 1989. Words and the Poet: Characteristic Techniques of Style in Vergil’s Aeneid. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Lynn-George, K. 1996. “Structures of Care in the Iliad.” Classical Quarterly 46 (1): 1–26.Google Scholar
Mackie, H. 1997. “Song and Storytelling: An Odyssean Perspective.” Transactions of the American Philological Association 127: 77–95.Google Scholar
Magnani, M. 2008. “Verg. Aen. IV 469–73.” Eikasmos: quaderni bolognesi di filologia classica 19: 225–33.Google Scholar
Martin, R. P. 1989. The Language of Heroes: Speech and Performance in the Iliad. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, R. P. 1997. “Similes and Performance.” In Bakker, E. and Kahane, A., eds. Written Voices, Spoken Signs: Tradition, Performance, and the Epic Text, pp. 138–66. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
McDermott, E. A. 2016. “‘Furor’ as Failed ‘Pietas’: Constructions of Madness through the Time of Virgil.” In Perdicoyanni-Paléologou, H., ed. The Concept of Madness from Homer to Byzantium: Manifestations and Aspects of Mental Illness and Disorder, pp. 191–244. Amsterdam: Hakkert.Google Scholar
Mills, S. 2000. “Achilles, Patroclus and Parental Care in Some Homeric Similes.” Greece & Rome 47 (1): 3–18.Google Scholar
Milnor, K. 2005. Gender, Domesticity, and the Age of Augustus: Inventing Private Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Minchin, E. 2001a. Homer and the Resources of Memory: Some Applications of Cognitive Theory to the Iliad and the Odyssey. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Minchin, E. 2001b. “Similes in Homer: Image, Mind’s Eye, and Memory.” In Watson, J., ed. Speaking Volumes: Orality and Literacy in the Greek and Roman World, pp. 25–52. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Minchin, E. 2002. “Verbal Behaviour in Its Social Context: Three Question Strategies in Homer’s ‘Odyssey.’” Classical Quarterly 52 (1): 15–32.Google Scholar
Mori, A. 2008. The Politics of Apollonius Rhodius’ Argonautica. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Morwood, J. 1998. “Virgil’s Pious Man and Menenius Agrippa: A Note on ‘Aeneid’ 1.148–53.” Greece & Rome n.s. 45 (2): 195–98.Google Scholar
Moulton, C. 1977. Similes in the Homeric Poems. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Mueller, J. M. 1977. “Review Article: Living Imagery, a Dead Tongue, and a Contemporary Mode of Analysis: Silk’s Theory of Poetic Interaction.” Classical Philology 72 (2): 146–59.Google Scholar
Mueller, M. 1984. The Iliad. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Muellner, L. 1990. “The Simile of the Cranes and Pygmies: A Study of Homeric Metaphor.” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 93: 59–101.Google Scholar
Murnaghan, S. 1986. “Penelope’s Agnoia: Knowledge, Power, and Gender in the Odyssey.” Helios 13 (2): 103–115.Google Scholar
Murnaghan, S. 1987. Disguise and Recognition in the Odyssey. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Murnaghan, S. 1994. “Reading Penelope.” In Oberhelman, S. M., Kelly, V., and Golsan, R. J., eds. Epic and Epoch: Essays on the Interpretation and History of a Genre, pp. 76–96. Lubbock: Texas Tech University Press.Google Scholar
Murnaghan, S. 2002. “The Trials of Telemachus: Who Was the Odyssey Meant For?” Arethusa 35 (1): 133–53.Google Scholar
Nagle, B. R. 1988. “Ovid’s ‘Reticent’ Heroes.” Helios 15 (1): 23–39.Google Scholar
Nagle, B. R. 1989. “Ovid’s Metamorphoses: A Narratological Catalogue.” Syllecta Classica 1: 92–125.Google Scholar
Nagy, G. 1979. The Best of the Achaeans: Concepts of the Hero in Archaic Greek Poetry. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Nagy, G. 1996. Poetry as Performance: Homer and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nannini, S. 2003. Analogia e polarità in similitudine: Paragoni iliadici e odissiaci a confronto. Amsterdam: Adolf M. Hakkert.Google Scholar
Nelis, D. 2005. “Apollonius of Rhodes.” In Foley, J. M., ed. A Companion to Ancient Epic, pp. 353–63. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Nicoll, W. S. M. 1980. “Cupid, Apollo, and Daphne (Ovid, Met. 1. 452 ff.).” Classical Quarterly 30 (1): 174–82.Google Scholar
Nimis, S. A. 1987. Narrative Semiotics in the Epic Tradition: The Simile. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Nünlist, R. 2009. The Ancient Critic at Work: Terms and Concepts of Literary Criticism in Greek Scholia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
O’Donoghue, J. 2009. “Is a Metaphor (Like) a Simile? Differences in Meaning, Effect and Processing.” UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 21: 125–49.Google Scholar
Olson, S. D. 1990. “The Stories of Agamemnon in Homer’s Odyssey.” Transactions of the American Philological Association 120: 57–71.Google Scholar
Otis, B. 1970. Ovid as an Epic Poet, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Otis, B. 1995. Virgil: A Study in Civilized Poetry, 2nd ed. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Papillon, T. L., and Haigh, A. E., eds. 1892. P. Vergili Maronis Opera Virgil. Vol. II, Notes. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Parry, A. 1972. “Language and Characterization in Homer.” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 76: 1–22.Google Scholar
Partington, A. 2006. “Metaphors, Motifs and Similes across Discourse Types: Corpus-Assisted Discourse Studies (CADS) at Work.” Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 171: 258–94.Google Scholar
Pavlock, B. 1990. Eros, Imitation, and the Epic Tradition. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Podlecki, A. J. 1971. “Some Odyssean Similies.” Greece & Rome 18 (1): 81–90.Google Scholar
Porter, D. H. 1972. “Violent Juxtaposition in the Similes of the ‘Iliad.’” Classical Journal 68 (1): 11–21.Google Scholar
Porter, D. H. 2010. “The Simile at Iliad 16.7–11 Once Again: Multiple Meanings.” Classical World 103 (4): 447–54.Google Scholar
Pöschl, V. 1970. The Art of Vergil. Translated by G. Seligson. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Purves, A. C. 2019. Homer and the Poetics of Gesture. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, M. C. J. 1966. The Poetry of the Aeneid: Four Studies in Imaginative Unity and Design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, M. C. J. 2011. The Humanness of Heroes. In Rijser, D., ed.. Vol. 1, The Amsterdam Vergil Lectures. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Raaflaub, K. A. 2006. “Romulus und die Wölfin: Roms Anfänge zwischen Mythos und Geschichte.” In Stein-Hölkeskamp, E. and Hölkeskamp, K.-J., eds. Erinnerungsorte der Antike: Die römische Welt, pp. 18–39. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
Ready, J. L. 2011. Character, Narrator, and Simile in the Iliad. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ready, J. L. 2018. The Homeric Simile in Comparative Perspectives: Oral Traditions from Saudi Arabic to Indonesia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Redfield, J. M. 1994. Nature and Culture in the Iliad: The Tragedy of Hector. Expanded ed. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Reed, J. D., ed. 2013. Ovidio Metamorfosi. Vol. V, Libri X–XII. Rome: Fondazione Lorenzo Valla.Google Scholar
Reitz, C. 1996. Zur Gleichnistechnik des Apollonios von Rhodos. Vol. 99, Studien zur klassischen Philologie. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Rengakos, A. 1994. Apollonios Rhodios und die antike Homererklärung. Vol. 92, Zetemata. Munich: C. H. Beck.Google Scholar
Richards, I. A. 1936. The Philosophy of Rhetoric. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Richardson, N. 1993. The Iliad: A Commentary. Vol. VI, Books 21–24. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Richlin, A. 2014. Arguments with Silence: Writing the History of Roman Women. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Rieks, R. 1981. “Die Gleichnisse Vergils.” In Haase, W., ed. Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt: Principät (Sprache und Literatur) II.31.2, pp. 1011–1110. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Rimmon-Kenan, S. 2002. Narrative Fiction: Contemporary Poetics, 2nd ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rood, N. 2006. “Implied Vengeance in the Simile of Grieving Vultures (Odyssey 16.216–19).” Classical Quarterly 56 (1): 1–11.Google Scholar
Rood, N. 2008. “Craft Similes and the Construction of Heroes in the Iliad.” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 104: 19–43.Google Scholar
Rosati, G. 2002. “Narrative Techniques and Narrative Structures in the Metamorphoses.” In Boyd, B. W., ed. Brill’s Companion to Ovid, pp. 271–304. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Rosati, G., ed. 2009. Ovidio Metamorfosi. Vol. III. Libri V–VI. Rome: Fondazione Lorenzo Valla.Google Scholar
Rossi, A. 2004. Contexts of War: Manipulation of Genre in Virgilian Battle Narrative. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Russo, J. A., Fernández-Galiano, M., and Heubeck, A.. 1992. A Commentary on Homer’s Odyssey. Vol. III, Books XVII–XXIV. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Rutherford, R. B. 1986. “The Philosophy of the Odyssey.” Journal of Hellenic Studies 106: 145–62.Google Scholar
Rutherford, R. B., ed. 1992. Homer Odyssey Books XIX and XX. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rutherford, R. B., 2013. Homer, 2nd ed. Vol. 41, Greece & Rome New Surveys in the Classics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rutherford, R. B., ed. 2019. Homer Iliad Book XVIII. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Saïd, S. 2011. Homer & the Odyssey. Translated by Webb, R.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Saïd, S. 2013. “From Homeric ATE to Tragic Madness.” In Harris, W. V., ed. Mental Disorders in the Classical World, pp. 363–93. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Saylor, C. 1990. “Group vs. Individual in Vergil ‘Aeneid’ IX.” Latomus 49 (1): 88–94.Google Scholar
Schadewaldt, W. 1959. Neue Kriterien zur Odyssee-Analyse: Die Wiedererkennung des Odysseus und der Penelope. Heidelberg: Carl Winter Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
Schein, S. L. 1984. The Mortal Hero: An Introduction to Homer’s Iliad. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Schenk, P. 1984. Die Gestalt des Turnus in Vergils Aeneis. Königstein: Verlag Anton Hain.Google Scholar
Schindler, C. 2000. Untersuchungen zu den Gleichnissen im römischen Lehrgedicht. Vol. 129, Hypomnemata. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Schmit-Neuerburg, T. 1999. Vergils Aeneis und die antike Homerexegese: Untersuchungen zum Einfluß ethischer und kritischer Homerrezeption auf imitatio und aemulatio Vergils. In Bühler, W., Herrmann, P., and Zwierlein, O., eds. Vol. 56, Untersuchungen zur antiken Literatur und Geschichte. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Schnapp-Gourbeillon, A. 1981. Lions, héros, masques: les représentations de l’animal chez homère. Paris: François Maspero.Google Scholar
Scott, W. C. 1974. The Oral Nature of the Homeric Simile. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Scott, W. C. 2009. The Artistry of the Homeric Simile. Hanover: University Press of New England.Google Scholar
Segal, C. P. 2001. “Intertextuality and Immortality: Ovid, Pythagoras and Lucretius in Metamorphoses 15.” Materiali e discussioni per l’analisi dei testi classici 46: 63–101.Google Scholar
Silk, M. S. 1974. Interaction in Poetic Imagery: With Special Reference to Early Greek Poetry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sistakou, E. 2016. Tragic Failures: Alexandrian Responses to Tragedy and the Tragic. Vol. 38, Trends in Classics. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Skutsch, O., ed. 1985. The Annals of Quintus Ennius. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Smith, S. M. 2008. “Primacy/Recency Effects.” In Darity, W. A. Jr., ed. International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences 6, pp. 457–458. Detroit: Macmillan Reference USA.Google Scholar
Snipes, K. 1988. “Literary Interpretation in the Homeric Scholia: The Similes of the Iliad.” American Journal of Philology 109 (2): 196–222.Google Scholar
Solodow, J. B. 1988. The World of Ovid’s Metamorphoses. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Stahl, H.-P. 1981. “Aeneas – An ‘Unheroic’ Hero?” Arethusa 14 (1): 157–77.Google Scholar
Steiner, H. R. 1952. Der Traum in der Aeneis. Bern: Verlag Paul Haupt.Google Scholar
Stephens, S. 2003. Seeing Double: Intercultural Poetics in Ptolemaic Alexandria. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Suerbaum, W. 1968. “Die Ich-Erzählungen des Odysseus: Überlegungen zur epischen Technik der Odyssee.” Poetica 2: 150–177.Google Scholar
Taaffe, L. K. 1990. “There’s No Place Like Home: ἀσπάσιος and Related Words in the ‘Odyssey.’” Classical Journal 86 (2): 131–38.Google Scholar
Tannen, D. 1989. Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tarrant, R. J. 2005. “Roads Not Taken: Untold Stories in Ovid’s Metamorphoses.” Materiali e discussioni per l’analisi dei testi classici 54: 65–89.Google Scholar
Tarrant, R. J, ed. 2012. Virgil Aeneid Book XII. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tartakovsky, R., and Shen, Y.. 2019. “Meek as Milk and Large as Logic: A Corpus Study of the Non-Standard Poetic Simile.” Language and Literature 28 (3): 203–220.Google Scholar
Thalmann, W. G. 2011. Apollonius of Rhodes and the Spaces of Hellenism. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. F., ed. 1988. Virgil Georgics. Vol. 2, Books III–IV. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tissol, G. 1993. “Ovid’s Little Aeneid and the Thematic Integrity of the Metamorphoses.” Helios 20 (1): 69–79.Google Scholar
Tsagalis, C. 2004. Epic Grief: Personal Laments in Homer’s Iliad. In Lehmann, G.-A., Nesselrath, H.-G., and Zwierlein, O., eds. Untersuchungen zur antiken Literatur und Geschichte 70. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Utz, R. L. , Caserta, M., and Lund, D.. 2012. “Grief, Depressive Symptoms, and Physical Health among Recently Bereaved Spouses.” The Gerontologist 52 (4): 460–71.Google Scholar
Valverde Sánchez, M. 1989. El Aition en las Argonáuticas de Apolonio de Rodas. Estudio literario. Murcia: Universidad de Murcia.Google Scholar
Vian, F., ed. 1974. Apollonios de Rhodes Argonautiques. Vol. I. Chants I–II. Paris: Société d’édition “les belles lettres.”Google Scholar
von Albrecht, M. 1981. “Les comparaisons dans les Métamorphoses d’Ovide.” Bulletin de l’Association Guillaume Budé 1: 24–34.Google Scholar
von Glinski, M. L. 2012. Simile and Identity in Ovid’s Metamorphoses. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Warwick, C. 2019. “The Maternal Warrior: Gender and Kleos in the Iliad.” American Journal of Philology 140 (1): 1–28.Google Scholar
Weiberg, E. 2018. A Story with No Ending: Penelope and Ambiguous Loss in the Odyssey. Albuquerque, NM: Annual Meeting of the Classical Association of the Midwest and South.Google Scholar
West, D. 1969. “Multiple-Correspondence Similes in the Aeneid.” Journal of Roman Studies 59 (1/2): 40–49.Google Scholar
Wheeler, S. M. 1999. A Discourse of Wonders: Audience and Performance in Ovid’s Metamorphoses. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Wilkins, E. G. 1932. “A Classification of the Similes of Ovid.” Classical Weekly 25 (10): 73–78 and 81–86.Google Scholar
Willcock, M. M. 1983. “Battle Scenes in the Aeneid.” Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society n.s. 29: 87–99.Google Scholar
Williams, G. W. 1980. “The Importance of Aspect in Virgilian Similes.” In Marshall, B., ed. Vindex Humanitatis: Essays in Honour of John Huntly Bishop, pp. 177–95. Armidale, New South Wales: University of New England.Google Scholar
Wofford, S. L. 1992. The Choice of Achilles: The Ideology of Figure in the Epic. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Zanker, A. T. 2019. Metaphor in Homer: Time, Speech, and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Deborah Beck, University of Texas, Austin
  • Book: The Stories of Similes in Greek and Roman Epic
  • Online publication: 06 July 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108668071.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Deborah Beck, University of Texas, Austin
  • Book: The Stories of Similes in Greek and Roman Epic
  • Online publication: 06 July 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108668071.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Deborah Beck, University of Texas, Austin
  • Book: The Stories of Similes in Greek and Roman Epic
  • Online publication: 06 July 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108668071.008
Available formats
×