Book contents
- Statius and Ovid
- Statius and Ovid
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Note on Texts and Translations
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- 1 The Post-Ovidian World of the Thebaid
- 2 Rewriting the Foundational Myths of Rome
- 3 Forging Divinity, Conceptualising Power
- Conclusion
- Appendix
- References
- Index Locorum
- General Index
2 - Rewriting the Foundational Myths of Rome
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 March 2024
- Statius and Ovid
- Statius and Ovid
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Note on Texts and Translations
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- 1 The Post-Ovidian World of the Thebaid
- 2 Rewriting the Foundational Myths of Rome
- 3 Forging Divinity, Conceptualising Power
- Conclusion
- Appendix
- References
- Index Locorum
- General Index
Summary
While Statius’ interventions in the poem seem to encourage a comparison between the poem’s characters and Virgil’s heroes, Chapter 2 shows that the Thebaid actually patterns its heroic narratives after some of the most politically charged myths of Ovid’s Metamorphoses, such as the stories of Cadmus, Perseus, Hercules, and Theseus. Statius’ descriptions of dysfunctional heroes, who re-tread the failure of their Ovidian ancestors to carry on the foundational mission of Virgil’s Hercules and Aeneas, seem to rework the anti-heroic paradigm set by Ovid’s Cadmus (Met. 3–4). By exploring the darker sides of the Aeneid’s gigantomachic discourse, these narratives open the Thebaid to a redefinition of traditional heroic paradigms that potentially questions the political significance of the heroes appropriated by the Flavian emperors in their refashioning of Augustan ideology. While offering new insights into Statius’ renegotiation of poetic independence from his predecessors, this exploration also illuminates the Thebaid’s sophisticated engagement with the material and ideological environments of Flavian Rome.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Statius and OvidPoetics, Politics, and Intermediality in the <I>Thebaid</I>, pp. 106 - 186Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2024