Anghie, A, Imperialism, Sovereignty, and the Making of International Law (1st pbk. edn, Cambridge University Press 2007)Google Scholar

Alston, P (ed), Non-State Actors and Human Rights (Oxford University Press 2005)Google Scholar

Aristotle, , Nicomachean Ethics (Hackett 2014)Google Scholar

Arrowsmith, S, Linarelli, J and Wallace, D, Regulating Public Procurement – National and International Perspectives (Kluwer Law International BV 2000)Google Scholar

Badia, A, Piercing the Veil of State Enterprises in International Arbitration (Kluwer Law International 2014)Google Scholar

Baldwin, R, Cave, M and Lodge, M, Understanding Regulation: Theory, Strategy, and Practice (Oxford University Press 2012)Google Scholar

Baslar, K, The Concept of the Common Heritage of Mankind in International Law (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 1998)Google Scholar

Bassan, F, The Law of Sovereign Wealth Funds (Edward Elgar 2011)Google Scholar

Benvenisti, E, The Law of Global Governance (Brill Nijhoff 2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bernaz, N, Business and Human Rights: History, Law and Policy: Bridging the Accountability Gap (Routledge 2017)Google Scholar

Bianchi, A, International Law Theories: An Inquiry into Different Ways of Thinking (Oxford University Press 2016)Google Scholar

Bianchi, A, (ed), Non-State Actors and International Law (Routledge 2017)Google Scholar

Blackstone, W, Commentaries on the Laws of England, Volume 2: A Facsimile of the First Edition of 1765–1769 (University of Chicago Press 1979)Google Scholar

Bomann-Larsen, L and Wiggen, O, Responsibility in World Business: Managing Harmful Side-Effects of Corporate Activity (United Nations University Press 2004)Google Scholar

Bremmer, I, The End of the Free Market: Who Wins the War between States and Corporations? (Penguin 2010)Google Scholar

Butt, P, Butterworths Concise Australian Legal Dictionary (LexisNexis Butterworths 2004)Google Scholar

Clapham, A, Human Rights in the Private Sphere (Clarendon Press 1996)Google Scholar

Clapham, A, Human Rights Obligations of Non-State Actors (Oxford University Press 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Collier, P, The Bottom Billion: Why the Poorest Countries Are Failing and What Can Be Done about It (Oxford University Press 2007)Google Scholar

Crawford, J, Brownlie’s Principles of Public International Law (Oxford University Press 2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crawford, J, State Responsibility: The General Part (Cambridge University Press 2013)Google Scholar

Crawford, J, Chance, Order, Change: The Course of International Law (Hague Academy of International Law 2014)Google Scholar

Crawford, J, State Responsibility: The General Part (1st pbk. edn, Cambridge University Press 2014)Google Scholar

d’Aspremont, J (ed), Participants in the International Legal System: Multiple Perspectives on Non-State Actors in International Law (Taylor & Francis 2011)Google Scholar

Dellapenna, JW, Suing Foreign Governments and Their Corporations (2nd edn, Transnational Publishers 2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deva, S, Regulating Corporate Human Rights Violations: Humanizing Business (1st pbk. edn, Routledge 2014)Google Scholar

Deva, S and Bilchitz, D (eds), Human Rights Obligations of Business: Beyond the Corporate Responsibility to Respect? (Cambridge University Press 2013)Google Scholar

Donaldson, T, Corporations and Morality (Prentice-Hall 1982)Google Scholar

Evans, MD (ed), International Law (4th edn, Oxford University Press 2014)Google Scholar

Fox, H and Webb, P, The Law of State Immunity (3rd edn, Oxford University Press 2013)Google Scholar

Friedmann, W, The Changing Structure of International Law (Columbia University Press, 1966)Google Scholar

Fuchs, DA, An Institutional Basis for Environmental Stewardship (Springer Science & Business Media 2003)Google Scholar

Gary, I and Karl, TL, Bottom of the Barrel: Africa’s Oil Boom and the Poor (Catholic Relief Services 2003)Google Scholar

Gianturco, DE, Export Credit Agencies: The Unsung Giants of International Trade and Finance (Greenwood Publishing Group 2001)Google Scholar

Grewe, WG, The Epochs of International Law (Walter de Gruyter 2013)Google Scholar

Hegel, GWF, Hegel: Elements of the Philosophy of Right (Cambridge University Press 1991)Google Scholar

Hepburn, S, Australian Principles of Property Law (Routledge 2013)Google Scholar

Herdegen, M, Principles of International Economic Law (Oxford University Press 2013)Google Scholar

Higgins, R, Problems and Process: International Law and How We Use It (Clarendon Press 1994)Google Scholar

Higgins, R, Problems and Process: International Law and How We Use It (Repr, Clarendon Press 2001)Google Scholar

Hobbes, T, Hobbes: Leviathan: Revised Student Edition (Cambridge University Press 1996)Google Scholar

Hults, DR, Thurber, MC and Victor, DG (eds), Oil and Governance: State-Owned Enterprises and the World Energy Supply (Cambridge University Press 2012)Google Scholar

Humphreys, M and others, Escaping the Resource Curse (Columbia University Press 2007)Google Scholar

Johns, F (ed), International Legal Personality (Ashgate 2010)Google Scholar

Karl, TL, The Paradox of Plenty: Oil Booms and Petro-States (University of California Press 1997)Google Scholar

Kelly, MJ, Prosecuting Corporations for Genocide (Oxford University Press 2016)Google Scholar

Kelsen, H, General Theory of Law and State (The Lawbook Exchange, Ltd 2007)Google Scholar

Kolb, R, The International Law of State Responsibility: An Introduction (Edward Elgar 2018)Google Scholar

Kulesza, J, Due Diligence in International Law (Brill Nijhoff 2016)Google Scholar

Lauterpacht, H, International Law: Being the Collected Papers of Hersch Lauterpacht (Volume 2, Part I International Law in General) (Lauterpacht, Elihu ed, Cambridge University Press 1975)Google Scholar

Locke, J, Two Treatises of Government (C and J Rivington 1824)Google Scholar

Lustig, D, Veiled Power: International Law and the Private Corporation, 1886–1981 (Oxford University Press 2020)Google Scholar

Marx, K, Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844 (Prometheus Books 1988)Google Scholar

Marx, K, Capital: A Critique of Political Economy (Penguin UK 2004)Google Scholar

McBeth, A, International Economic Actors and Human Rights (Routledge 2009)Google Scholar

McConnell, L, Extracting Accountability from Non-State Actors in International Law: Assessing the Scope for Direct Regulation (Taylor & Francis 2016)Google Scholar

McCorquodale, R, International Law beyond the State: Essays on Sovereignty, Non-State Actors and Human Rights (CMP 2011)Google Scholar

Milanovic, M, Extraterritorial Application of Human Rights Treaties: Law, Principles, and Policy (Oxford University Press 2011)Google Scholar

Morrison, R, The Principles of Project Finance (Routledge 2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Muchlinski, PT, Multinational Enterprises and the Law (2nd edn, Oxford University Press 2007)Google Scholar

Musacchio, A and Lazzarini, SG, Reinventing State Capitalism (Harvard University Press 2014)Google Scholar

Nijman, JE, The Concept of International Legal Personality: An Inquiry into the History and Theory of International Law (TMC Asser Press 2004)Google Scholar

Noortmann, M, Reinisch, A and Ryngaert, C, Non-State Actors in International Law (Bloomsbury 2015)Google Scholar

Oppenheim, L, International Law: A Treatsie, vol 1 (2nd edn, Longmans, Green and Co 1912)Google Scholar

Parker, D, The Official History of Privatisation Vol. I: The Formative Years 1970–1987 (1st edn, Routledge 2009)Google Scholar

Parlett, K, The Individual in the International Legal System: Continuity and Change in International Law (Cambridge University Press 2011)Google Scholar

Pauwelyn, J, Wessel, RA and Wouters, J (eds), Informal International Lawmaking (1st edn, Oxford University Press 2012)Google Scholar

Plato, , The Republic of Plato (Basic Books 1991)Google Scholar

Pogge, TW, World Poverty and Human Rights (Polity 2008)Google Scholar

Portmann, R, Legal Personality in International Law (Cambridge University Press 2010)Google Scholar

Prosser, T, The Regulatory Enterprise: Government, Regulation, and Legitimacy (Oxford University Press 2010)Google Scholar

Proudhon, P-J, What Is Property?: An Inquiry Into the Principle of Right and of Government (BR Tucker 1876)Google Scholar

Roland, G, Privatization: Successes and Failures (Columbia University Press 2013)Google Scholar

Sauvant, KP, Sachs, LE and Jongbloed, WPFS (eds), Sovereign Investment: Concerns and Policy Reactions (Oxford University Press 2012)Google Scholar

Scelle, G, Précis de droit des gens: principes et systématique (Librairie du Recueil Sirey (société anonyme) 1932)Google Scholar

Schreuer, CH, State Immunity: Some Recent Developments, vol 8 (Grotius 1988)Google Scholar

Schultz, T, Transnational Legality: Stateless Law and International Arbitration (Oxford University Press 2014)Google Scholar

Schutter, OD, International Human Rights Law: Cases, Materials, Commentary (2nd edn, Cambridge University Press 2014)Google Scholar

Shaw, MN, International Law (Cambridge University Press 2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shaw, MN, International Law (7th edn, Cambridge University Press 2014)Google Scholar

Sinclair, HM, The Principles of International Trade (The Macmillan Company 1932)Google Scholar

Solomon, J, Corporate Governance and Accountability (John Wiley & Sons 2007)Google Scholar

Stern, PJ, The Company-State: Corporate Sovereignty and the Early Modern Foundations of the British Empire in India (Oxford University Press 2012)Google Scholar

Thirlway, H, The Sources of International Law (Oxford University Press 2014)Google Scholar

Toninelli, PM (ed), The Rise and Fall of State-Owned Enterprise in the Western World (Cambridge University Press 2000)Google Scholar

Tordo, S, National Oil Companies and Value Creation (The World Bank 2011)Google Scholar

Trindade, AAC, International Law for Humankind: Towards a New Jus Gentium (Brill Nijhoff 2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Xing, L, The Rise of China and the Capitalist World Order (Ashgate 2013)Google Scholar

Yang, X, State Immunity in International Law (Cambridge University Press 2012)Google Scholar

Zerk, JA, Multinationals and Corporate Social Responsibility: Limitations and Opportunities in International Law (1st pbk. edn, Cambridge University Press 2011)Google Scholar

Aharoni, Y, ‘The Evolution of State-Owned Multinational Enterprise Theory’ in Cuervo-Cazurra, Alvaro (ed), State-Owned Multinationals: Governments in Global Business (Palgrave Macmillan 2018)Google Scholar

Alston, P, ‘The “Not-a-Cat” Syndrome: Can the International Human Rights Regime Accommodate Non-State Actors?’ in Alston, Philip (ed), Non-State Actors and Human Rights (Oxford University Press 2005)Google Scholar

Amatori, F, ‘Beyond State and Market: Italy’s Futile Search for a Third Way’ in Toninelli, Pier Angelo (ed), The Rise and Fall of State-Owned Enterprise in the Western World (Cambridge University Press 2000)Google Scholar

Augenstein, D and Kinley, D, ‘When Human Rights “Responsibilities” Become “Duties”: The Extra-Territorial Obligations of States That Bind Corporations’ in Deva, Surya and Bilchitz, David (eds), Human Rights Obligations of Business: Beyond the Corporate Responsibility to Respect (Cambridge University Press 2013)Google Scholar

Backer, LC, ‘Human Rights Responsibilities of State-Owned Enterprises’ in Deva, Surya and Birchall, David (eds), Research Handbook on Human Rights and Business (Edward Elgar 2020)Google Scholar

Banifatemi, Y, ‘Jurisdictional Immunity of States – Commercial Transactions’ in Angelet, Nicolas and Ferro, Luca (eds), The Cambridge Handbook of Immunities and International Law (Cambridge University Press 2019)Google Scholar

Barnes, MM, ‘International Investment Law and State-Owned Entities: Recurrent Key Issues and Future Directions’ in Sachs, Lisa E and others (eds), 2018 Yearbook of International Investment Law and Policy (Oxford University Press 2019)Google Scholar

Bellini, N, ‘The Decline of State-Owned Enterprise and the New Foundations of the State–Industry Relationship’ in Toninelli, Pier Angelo (ed), The Rise and Fall of State-Owned Enterprise in the Western World (Cambridge University Press 2000)Google Scholar

Bianchi, A, ‘Reflexive Butterfly Catching: Insights from a Situated Catcher’ in Pauwelyn, Joost, Wessel, Ramses A and Wouters, Jan (eds), Informal International Lawmaking (Oxford University Press 2012)Google Scholar

Bilchitz, D, ‘A Chasm between “Is” and “Ought”? A Critique of the Normative Foundations of the SRSG’s Framework and the Guiding Principles’ in Deva, Surya and Bilchitz, David (eds), Human Rights Obligations of Business: Beyond the Corporate Responsibility to Respect? (Cambridge University Press 2013)Google Scholar

Bilchitz, D and Deva, S, ‘The Human Rights Obligations of Business: A Critical Framework for the Future’ in Deva, Surya and Bilchitz, David (eds) Human Rights Obligations of Business: Beyond the Corporate Responsibility to Respect? (Cambridge University Press 2013)Google Scholar

Boyle, A, ‘Soft Law in International Law-Making’ in Evans, Malcolm D (ed), International Law (4th edn, Oxford University Press 2014)Google Scholar

Brölmann, CM and Nijman, JE, ‘Legal Personality as a Fundamental Concept for International Law’ in D’Aspremont, Jean and Singh, Sahib (eds), Concepts for International Law (Edward Elgar 2019)Google Scholar

Brownsword, R, ‘What the World Needs Now: Techno-Regulation, Human Rights and Human Dignity’ in Brownsword, Roger (ed), Global Governance and the Quest for Justice, vol IV: Human Rights (Oxford University Press 2004)Google Scholar

Buhmann, K, ‘Navigating from “Train Wreck” to Being “Welcomed”: Negotiation Strategies and Argumentative Patterns in the Development of the UN Framework’ in Deva, Surya and Bilchitz, David (eds), Human Rights Obligations of Business: Beyond the Corporate Responsibility to Respect (Cambridge University Press 2013)Google Scholar

Carreras, A, Tafunell, X and Torres, E, ‘The Rise and Decline of Spanish State-Owned Firms’ in Toninelli, Pier Angelo (ed), The Rise and Fall of State-Owned Enterprise in the Western World (Cambridge University Press 2000)Google Scholar

Chadeau, E, ‘The Rise and Decline of State-Owned Industry in Twentieth-Century France’ in Toninelli, Pier Angelo (ed), The Rise and Fall of State-Owned Enterprise in the Western World (Cambridge University Press 2000)Google Scholar

Charlesworth, H, ‘A Regulatory Perspective on the International Human Rights System’ in Drahos, Peter (ed), Regulatory Theory: Foundations and Applications (ANU Press 2017)Google Scholar

Chetail, V, ‘The Legal Personality of Multinational Corporations, State Responsibility and Due Diligence: The Way Forward’ in Alland, Denis and others (eds), Unity and Diversity of International Law: Essays in Honour of Professor Pierre-Marie Dupuy (Brill 2014)Google Scholar

Chinkin, C, ‘Normative Development in the International Legal System’ in Shelton, Dinah (ed), Commitment and Compliance: The Role of Non-binding Norms in the International Legal System (Oxford University Press 2003)Google Scholar

Choudhury, P and Khanna, T, ‘Toward Resource Independence – Why State-Owned Entities Become Multinationals: An Empirical Study of India’s Public R&D Laboratories’ in Cuervo-Cazurra, Alvaro (ed), State-Owned Multinationals: Governments in Global Business (Palgrave Macmillan 2018)Google Scholar

Crawford, J and Keene, A, ‘The Structure of State Responsibility under the European Convention on Human Rights’ in van Aaken, Anne and Motoc, Iulia (eds), The European Convention on Human Rights and General International Law (Oxford University Press 2018)Google Scholar

Crawford, J and Olleson, S, ‘The Character and Forms of International Responsibility’ in Evans, Malcolm D (ed), International Law (4th edn, Oxford University Press 2014)Google Scholar

Cuervo-Cazurra, A, ‘State-Owned Multinationals: An Introduction’ in Cuervo-Cazurra, Alvaro (ed), State-Owned Multinationals: Governments in Global Business (Palgrave Macmillan 2018)Google Scholar

Cui, L and Jiang, F, ‘State Ownership Effect on Firms’ FDI Ownership Decisions under Institutional Pressure: A Study of Chinese Outward-Investing Firms’ in Cuervo-Cazurra, Alvaro (ed), State-Owned Multinationals: Governments in Global Business (Palgrave Macmillan 2018)Google Scholar

d’Argent, P and Lesaffre, P, ‘Immunities and Jus Cogens Violations’ in Angelet, Nicolas and Ferro, Luca (eds), The Cambridge Handbook of Immunities and International Law (Cambridge University Press 2019)Google Scholar

d’Aspremont, J, ‘Bindingness’ in d’Aspremont, Jean and Singh, Sahib (eds), Concepts for International Law (Edward Elgar 2019)Google Scholar

Damrosch, LF, ‘The Sources of Immunity Law: Between International and Domestic Law’ in Ruys, Tom and Angelet, Nicolas (eds), The Cambridge Handbook of Immunities and International Law (Cambridge University Press 2019)Google Scholar

Davids, M and Van Zanden, JL, ‘A Reluctant State and Its Enterprises State-Owned Enterprises in the Netherlands in the “Long” Twentieth Century’ in Toninelli, Pier Angelo (ed), The Rise and Fall of State-Owned Enterprise in the Western World (Cambridge University Press 2000)Google Scholar

Den Hertog, J, ‘General Theories of Regulation’ in Bouckaert, Boudewijn and de Geest, Gerrit (eds.), Encyclopedia of Law and Economics, Vol. III, The Regulation of Contracts (Edward Elgar 2000)Google Scholar

Deva, S, ‘Treating Human Rights Lightly: A Critique of the Consensus Rhetoric and the Language Employed by the Guiding Principles’ in Deva, Surya and Bilchitz, David (eds), Human Rights Obligations of Business: Beyond the Corporate Responsibility to Respect (Cambridge University Press 2013)Google Scholar

Deva, S, ‘From Business or Human Rights to Business and Human Rights: What Next?’ in Deva, Surya and Birchall, David, Research Handbook on Human Rights and Business (Edward Elgar 2020)Google Scholar

Douglas, Z, ‘Other Specific Regimes of Responsibility: Investment Treaty Arbitration and ICSID’ in Crawford, James and others (eds), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford University Press 2010)Google Scholar

El Sawah, S, ‘Jurisdictional Immunity of States and Non-Commercial Torts’ in Ruys, Tom and Angelet, Nicolas (eds), The Cambridge Handbook of Immunities and International Law (Cambridge University Press 2019)Google Scholar

Evans, M, ‘State Responsibility and the European Convention on Human Rights: Role and Realm’ in Fitzmaurice, Malgosia and Sarooshi, Dan (eds), Issues of State Responsibility before International Judicial Institutions (Hart 2004)Google Scholar

Fox, H, ‘The Restrictive Rule of State Immunity: The 1970s Enactment and Its Contemporary Status’ in Ruys, Tom and Angelet, Nicolas (eds), The Cambridge Handbook of Immunities and International Law (Cambridge University Press 2019)Google Scholar

Galambos, L, ‘State-Owned Enterprises in a Hostile Environment: The U.S. Experience’ in Toninelli, Pier Angelo (ed), The Rise and Fall of State-Owned Enterprise in the Western World (Cambridge University Press 2000)Google Scholar

Galambos, L and Baumol, W, ‘Conclusion’ in Toninelli, Pier Angelo (ed), The Rise and Fall of State-Owned Enterprise in the Western World (Cambridge University Press 2000)Google Scholar

Goldmann, M, ‘Relative Normativity’ in d’Aspremont, Jean and Singh, Sahib (eds), Concepts for International Law (Edward Elgar 2019)Google Scholar

Hua Li, M, Cui, L and Lu, J, ‘Varieties in State Capitalism: Outward FDI Strategies of Central and Local State-Owned Enterprises from Emerging Economy Countries’ in Cuervo-Cazurra, Alvaro (ed), State-Owned Multinationals: Governments in Global Business (Palgrave Macmillan 2018)Google Scholar

Ietto-Gillies, G, ‘The Role of Transnational Corporations in the Globalisation Process’ in Michie, Jonathan (ed), The Handbook of Globalisation (2nd edn, Edward Elgar 2011)Google Scholar

Page, J, ‘Towards an Understanding of Public Property’ in Hopkins, Nicholas (ed), Modern Studies in Property Law (Bloomsbury 2013)Google Scholar

Johns, F, ‘Theorizing the Corporation in International Law’ in Orford, Anne and Hoffmann, Florian (eds), The Oxford Handbook of the Theory of International Law (Oxford University Press 2016)Google Scholar

Kammerhofer, J, ‘Hans Kelsen in Today’s International Legal Scholarship’ in Kammerhofer, Jörg and D’Aspremont, Jean (eds), International Legal Positivism in a Post-Modern World (Cambridge University Press 2014)Google Scholar

Kammerhofer, J and D’Aspremont, J, ‘Introduction: The Future of International Legal Positivism’ in Kammerhofer, Jörg and D’Aspremont, Jean (eds), International Legal Positivism in a Post-Modern World (Cambridge University Press 2014)Google Scholar

Krajewski, M and Singer, C, ‘Should Judges Be Front-Runners? The ICJ, State Immunity and the Protection of Fundamental Human Rights’ in Bogdandy von, A and Wolfrum, R (eds), Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law, vol 16 (Brill 2012)Google Scholar

Lauterpacht, H, ‘The Subjects of International Law’ in Lauterpacht, Elihu (ed), International Law: Volume 1, The General Works: Being the Collected Papers of Hersch Lauterpacht (Cambridge University Press 1970)Google Scholar

Marks, S and Azizi, F, ‘Responsibility for Violations of Human Rights Obligations: International Mechanisms’ in Crawford, James and others (eds), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford University Press 2010)Google Scholar

Martin-Ortega, O and O’Brien, CM, Public Procurement and Human Rights (Edward Elgar 2019)Google Scholar

Mazzolini, R, ‘European Government-Controlled Enterprises: Explaining International Strategic and Policy Decisions’ in Cuervo-Cazurra, Alvaro (ed), State-Owned Multinationals: Governments in Global Business (Palgrave Macmillan 2018)Google Scholar

McCorquodale, R, ‘The Impact of International Human Rights Law on State Responsibility’ in Kamminga, Menno T and Scheinin, M (eds), The Impact of Human Rights on General International Law (Oxford University Press 2009)Google Scholar

McCorquodale, R, ‘The Individual and the International Legal System’ in Evans, Malcolm D (ed), International Law (4th edn, Oxford University Press 2014)Google Scholar

McCorquodale, R, ‘Sources and the Subjects of International Law: A Plurality of Law-Making Participants’ in Besson, Samantha and d’Aspremont, Jean (eds), The Oxford Handbook on the Sources of International Law (1st edn, Oxford University Press 2017)Google Scholar

Meyer, KE, Ding, Y and Zhang, H, ‘Overcoming Distrust: How State-Owned Enterprises Adapt Their Foreign Entries to Institutional Pressures Abroad’ in Cuervo-Cazurra, Alvaro (ed), State-Owned Multinationals: Governments in Global Business (Palgrave Macmillan 2018)Google Scholar

Michalowski, S, ‘Due Diligence and Complicity: A Relationship in Need of Clarification’ in Deva, Surya and Bilchitz, David (eds), Human Rights Obligations of Business: Beyond the Corporate Responsibility to Respect? (Cambridge University Press 2013)Google Scholar

Millward, R and Toninelli, PA, ‘State Enterprise in Britain in the Twentieth Century’ in Toninelli, Pier Angelo (ed), The Rise and Fall of State-Owned Enterprise in the Western World (Cambridge University Press 2000)Google Scholar

Motoc, I and Vasel, JJ, ‘The ECHR and Responsibility of the State: Moving Towards Judicial Integration’ in van Aaken, Anne and Motoc, Iulia (eds), The European Convention on Human Rights and General International Law (Oxford University Press 2018)Google Scholar

Mulligan, M, ‘East India Company: Non-State Actor as Treaty-Maker’ in Summers, James and Gough, Alex (eds), Non-State Actors and International Obligations (Brill Nijhoff 2018)Google Scholar

Musacchio, A and Lazzarini, SG, ‘State-Owned Enterprises as Multinationals: Theory and Research Directions’ in Cuervo-Cazurra, Alvaro (ed), State-Owned Multinationals: Governments in Global Business (Palgrave Macmillan 2018)Google Scholar

Nolan, J, ‘The Corporate Responsibility to Respect Human Rights: Soft Law or Not Law?’ in Deva, Surya and Bilchitz, David (eds), Human Rights Obligations of Business: Beyond the Corporate Responsibility to Respect? (Cambridge University Press 2013)Google Scholar

O’Brien, CM and Martin-Ortega, O, ‘Human Rights and Public Procurement of Goods and Services’ in Deva, Surya and Birchall, David (eds), Research Handbook on Human Rights and Business (Edward Elgar 2020)Google Scholar

Orakhelashvili, A, ‘Jurisdictional Immunities of States and General International Law: Explaining the Jus Gestionis v. Jus Imperii Divide’ in Ruys, Tom and Angelet, Nicolas (eds), The Cambridge Handbook of Immunities and International Law (Cambridge University Press 2019)Google Scholar

Pauwelyn, J, ‘Is It International Law or Not, and Does It Even Matter?’ in Pauwelyn, Joost, Wessel, Ramses A and Wouters, Jan (eds), Informal International Lawmaking (Oxford University Press 2012)Google Scholar

Pellet, A, ‘The Definition of Responsibility in International Law’ in Crawford, James and others (eds), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford University Press 2010)Google Scholar

Russo, D, ‘The Attribution to States of the Conduct of Public Enterprises in the Fields of Investment and Human Rights Law’, The Italian Yearbook of International Law 2019 (Brill Nijhoff 2020)Google Scholar

Ruys, T, Angelet, N and Ferro, L, ‘Introduction: International Immunities in a State of Flux?’ in Angelet, Nicolas and Ferro, Luca (eds), The Cambridge Handbook of Immunities and International Law (Cambridge University Press 2019)Google Scholar

Shan, W and Wang, P, ‘Divergent Views on State Immunity in the International Community’ in Angelet, Nicolas and Ferro, Luca (eds), The Cambridge Handbook of Immunities and International Law (Cambridge University Press 2019)Google Scholar

Shapiro, D and Globerman, S, ‘The International Activities and Impacts of State-Owned Enterprises’ in Sauvant, Karl P, Sachs, Lisa E and Wouter, Schmit Jongbloed PF (eds), Sovereign Investment: Concerns and Policy Reactions (Oxford University Press 2012)Google Scholar

Shelton, D, ‘Law, Non-Law and the Problem of “Soft-Law”’ in Shelton, Dinah (ed), Commitment and Compliance: The Role of Non-binding Norms in the International Legal System (Oxford University Press 2003)Google Scholar

Shue, H, ‘The Interdependence of Duties’ in Philip, Alston and Katarina, Tomaševski (eds), The Right to Food (Martinus Nijhoff 1984)Google Scholar

Simma, B and Pulkowski, D, ‘Leges Speciales and Self-Contained Regimes’ in Crawford, James and others (eds), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford University Press 2010)Google Scholar

Stewart, DP, ‘Immunity and Terrorism’ in Ruys, Tom and Angelet, Nicolas (eds), The Cambridge Handbook of Immunities and International Law (Cambridge University Press 2019)Google Scholar

Stiefel, D, ‘Fifty Years of State-Owned Industry in Austria, 1946–1996’ in Toninelli, Pier Angelo (ed), The Rise and Fall of State-Owned Enterprise in the Western World (Cambridge University Press 2000)Google Scholar

Stiglitz, JE, ‘On Liberty, the Right to Know, and Public Discourse: The Role of Transparency in Public Life’ in Gibney, Matthew J (ed), Globalizing Rights: The Oxford Amnesty Lectures 1999 (Oxford University Press 2003)Google Scholar

Stiglitz, JE, ‘Making Natural Resources into a Blessing Rather Than a Curse’ in Tsalik, S and Schiffrin, A (eds), Covering Oil: A Reporter’s Guide to Energy and Development (New York Revenue Watch, Open Society Institute 2005)Google Scholar

Sullivan, D, ‘The Public/Private Distinction in International Human Rights Law’ in Julie, Peters and Andrea, Wolper (eds), Women’s Rights, Human Rights: International Feminist Perspectives (Routledge 1995)Google Scholar

Toninelli, PA, ‘Preface’ in Toninelli, Pier Angelo (ed), The Rise and Fall of State-Owned Enterprise in the Western World (Cambridge University Press 2000)Google Scholar

Toninelli, PA, ‘The Rise and Fall of Public Enterprise: The Framework’ in Toninelli, Pier Angelo (ed), The Rise and Fall of State-Owned Enterprise in the Western World (Cambridge University Press 2000)Google Scholar

Vernon, R, ‘The International Aspects of State-Owned Enterprises’ in Cuervo-Cazurra, Alvaro (ed), State-Owned Multinationals: Governments in Global Business (Palgrave Macmillan 2018)Google Scholar

Webb, P, ‘A Moving Target: The Approach of the Strasbourg Court to Immunity’ in van Aaken, Anne and Motoc, Iulia (eds), The European Convention on Human Rights and General International Law (Oxford University Press 2018)Google Scholar

Wegenroth, U, ‘The Rise and Fall of State-Owned Enterprise in Germany’ in Toninelli, Pier Angelo (ed), The Rise and Fall of State-Owned Enterprise in the Western World (Cambridge University Press 2000)Google Scholar

Wettstein, F, ‘Making Noise about Silent Complicity: The Moral Inconsistency of the “Protect, Respect and Remedy” Framework’ in Deva, Surya and Bilchitz, David (eds) Human Rights Obligations of Business beyond the Corporate Responsibility to Respect? (Cambridge University Press 2013)Google Scholar

Aidoo, R and others, ‘Footprints of the Dragon: China’s Oil Diplomacy and Its Impacts on Sustainable Development Policy in Ecuador and Ghana’ (2017) 8 Revue internationale de politique de développement <https://doi:10.4000/poldev.2408>Google Scholar

Allott, P, ‘State Responsibility and the Unmaking of International Law’ (1988) 29 Harv. Int’l. L.J. 1Google Scholar

Alvarez, JE, ‘Are Corporations “Subjects” of International Law?’ (2011) 9 Santa Clara J. Int’l L. 1Google Scholar

Alvarez, JE, ‘The Relativity Apocalypse Is Nigh’ (2020) 114 AJIL Unbound 77Google Scholar

Arnold, DG, ‘Transnational Corporations and the Duty to Respect Basic Human Rights’ (2010) 20 Bus. Ethics Q. 371Google Scholar

Augustine, ZP, ‘Cyber Neutrality: A Textual Analysis of Traditional Jus in Bello Neutrality Rules through a Purpose-Based Lens’ (2014) 71 AFL Rev. 69Google Scholar

Backer, LC, ‘Sovereign Investing in Times of Crisis: Global Regulation of Sovereign Wealth Funds, State-Owned Enterprises, and the Chinese Experience’ (2010) 19 Transnat’l L. & Contemp. Probs. 3Google Scholar

Backer, LC, ‘Sovereign Investing and Markets Based Transnational Rule of Law Building: The Norwegian Sovereign Wealth Fund in Global Markets’ (2013) 29 Am. Univ. Int. Law Rev. 1Google Scholar

Backer, LC, ‘The Human Rights Obligations of State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs): Emerging Conceptual Structures and Principles in National and International Law and Policy’ (2017) 50 Vand. J. Transnat’l L. 827Google Scholar

Barelli, M, ‘The Role of Soft Law in the International Legal System: The Case of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples’ (2009) 58 Int’l & Comp. L.Q. 957Google Scholar

Barnes, MM, ‘The United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, the State Duty to Protect Human Rights and the State-Business Nexus’ (2018) 15 Brazilian J. Int. Law 42.Google Scholar

Barnes, MM, ‘State-Owned Entities as Key Actors in the Promotion and Implementation of the Agenda 2030 for Sustainable Development: Examples of Good Practices’ (2019) Laws 1Google Scholar

Barnett, GM, ‘Combating Trade Secret Theft by Foreign State-Owned Entities: An International Law Approach’ (2016) 5 J. Int. and Comp. Law 2Google Scholar

Barnidge, RP Jr, ‘The Due Diligence Principle under International Law’ 8 ICLR 81Google Scholar

Baxter, RR, ‘International Law in “Her Infinite Variety”’ (1980) 29 Int’l & Comp. L.Q. 549Google Scholar

Baylis, E, ‘The International Law Commission’s Soft Law Influence’ (2019) 13 Fla. Int’l U. L. Rev. 1007Google Scholar

Belsky, AC, Merva, M and Roht-Arriaza, N, ‘Implied Waiver under the FSIA: A Proposed Exception to Immunity for Violations of Peremptory Norms of International Law’ (1989) 77 Cal. L. Rev. 365Google Scholar

Bianchi, A, ‘Immunity versus Human Rights: The Pinochet Case’ (1999) 10 Eur. J. Int. Law 237Google Scholar

Bianchi, A, ‘Human Rights and the Magic of Jus Cogens’ (2008) 19 Eur. J. Int. Law 491Google Scholar

Bianchi, A, ‘Gazing at the Crystal Ball (Again): State Immunity and Jus Cogens beyond Germany v Italy’ (2013) 4 J. Int. Dispute Settl. 457Google Scholar

Blank, Y and Rosen-Zvi, I, ‘The Persistence of the Public/Private Divide in Environmental Regulation’ (2014) 15 Theor. Inq. Law 199Google Scholar

Blyschak, P, ‘State-Owned Enterprises and International Investment Treaties: When Are State-Owned Entities and Their Investments Protected (2011) 6 J. Int’l L. & Int’l Rel. 1Google Scholar

Bonnitcha, J and McCorquodale, R, ‘The Concept of “Due Diligence” in the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights’ (2017) 28 Eur. J. Int. Law 899Google Scholar

Bonnitcha, J and McCorquodale, R, ‘The Concept of “Due Diligence” in the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: A Rejoinder to John Gerard Ruggie and John F. Sherman, III’ (2017) 28 Eur. J. Int. Law 929Google Scholar

Boon, KE, ‘Are Control Tests Fit for the Future: The Slippage Problem in Attribution Doctrines’ (2014) 15 Melb. J. Int’l L. 330Google Scholar

Borlini, L, ‘When the Leviathan Goes to the Market: A Critical Evaluation of the Rules Governing State-Owned Enterprises in Trade Agreements’ (2020) 33 Leiden J. Int. Law 313Google Scholar

Bruton, GD and others, ‘State-Owned Enterprises around the World as Hybrid Organizations’ (2015) 29 Acad. Manag. Perspect. 92Google Scholar

Buhi, J, ‘Negocio de China: Building Upon the Santiago Principles to Form an Effective International Approach to Sovereign Wealth Fund Regulation’ (2009) 39 Hong Kong L.J. 197Google Scholar

Caplan, LM, ‘State Immunity, Human Rights, and Jus Cogens: A Critique of the Normative Hierarchy Theory’ (2003) 97 Am. J. Int. Law 741Google Scholar

Caron, DD, ‘The ILC Articles on State Responsibility: The Paradoxical Relationship between Form and Authority’ (2002) 96 Am. J. Int. Law 857Google Scholar

Casini, L, ‘“Down the Rabbit-Hole”: The Projection of the Public/Private Distinction beyond the State’ (2014) 12 Int. J. Const. Law 402Google Scholar

Caudill, DS, ‘Breaking Out of the Capitalist Paradigm: The Significance of Ideology in Determining the Sovereign Immunity of Soviet and Eastern-Bloc Commercial Entities’ (1979) 2 Houst. J. Int. Law 425Google Scholar

Chaisse, J, ‘State Capitalism on the Ascent: Stress, Shock, and Adaptation of the International Law on Foreign Investment’ (2018) 27 Minn. J. Int’l L. 339Google Scholar

Charlesworth, H, ‘The Public/Private Distinction and the Right to Development in International Law’ (1988) 12 Aust. YBIL 190Google Scholar

Chick, M, ‘Review of The First Privatisation: The Politicians, the City, and the Denationalisation of Steel’ (1989) 63 Bus. Hist. Rev. 986Google Scholar

Chinkin, C, ‘A Critique of the Public/Private Dimension’ (1999) 10 Eur. J. Int. Law 387Google Scholar

Chinkin, C, ‘The Challenge of Soft Law: Development and Change in International Law’ (1989) 38 Int’l & Comp. L.Q. 850Google Scholar

Chirwa, DM, ‘The Doctrine of State Responsibility as a Potential Means of Holding Private Actors Accountable for Human Rights’ (2004) 5 Melb. J. Int’l L. 1Google Scholar

Christenson, GA, ‘Attributing Acts of Omission to the State’ (1991) 12 Mich. J. Int’l L 60Google Scholar

Ciriacy-Wantrup, SV and Bishop, RC, ‘Common Property as a Concept in Natural Resources Policy’ (1975) 15 Nat. Resources J. 713Google Scholar

Cleveland, SH, ‘After Kiobel’ (2014) 12 J. Int. Crim. Justice 551Google Scholar

Cragg, W, ‘Ethics, Enlightened Self-Interest, and the Corporate Responsibility to Respect Human Rights: A Critical Look at the Justificatory Foundations of the UN Framework’ (2012) 22 Bus. Ethics Q. 9Google Scholar

Crawford, J, ‘International Law and Foreign Sovereigns: Distinguishing Immune Transactions’ (1984) 54 Br. Yearb. Int. Law 75Google Scholar

Crawford, J, ‘Revising the Draft Articles on State Responsibility’ (1999) 10 Eur. J. Int. Law 435Google Scholar

Crow, ME, ‘Smokescreens and State Responsibility: Using Human Rights Strategies to Promote Global Tobacco Control’ (2004) 29 Yale J. Int’l L. 209Google Scholar

Cuervo-Cazzura, A, ‘Governments as Owners: State-Owned Multinational Companies’ (2014) 45 J. Int. Bus. Stud. 919Google Scholar

d’Aspremont, J, ‘Softness in International Law: A Self-Serving Quest for New Legal Materials’ (2008) 19 Eur. J. Int. Law, 1075Google Scholar

De Schutter, O, ‘Commentary to the Maastricht Principles on Extraterritorial Obligations of States in the Area of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights’ (2012) 34 HRQ 1084Google Scholar

De Schutter, O, ‘Towards a New Treaty on Business and Human Rights’ (2016) 1 BHRJ 41Google Scholar

De Sena, P and De Vittor, F, ‘State Immunity and Human Rights: The Italian Supreme Court Decision on the Ferrini Case’ (2005) 16 Eur. J. Int. Law 89Google Scholar

Demsetz, H, ‘Toward a Theory of Property Rights’ (1967) 57 Am. Econ. Rev. 347Google Scholar

Deva, S, ‘Global Compact: A Critique of the UN’s Public-Private Partnership for Promoting Corporate Citizenship’ (2006) 34 Syracuse J. Int’l L. & Com. 107Google Scholar

Dickinson, LA, ‘Government for Hire: Privatizing Foreign Affairs and the Problem of Accountability under International Law’ (2005) 47 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 135Google Scholar

Dixon, AD, ‘Enhancing the Transparency Dialogue in the Santiago Principles for Sovereign Wealth Funds’ (2013) 37 Seattle UL Rev. 581Google Scholar

Du, M, ‘China’s State Capitalism and World Trade Law’ (2014) 63 Int. Comp. Law Q. 409Google Scholar

Dufresne, R, ‘Opacity of Oil: Oil Corporations, Internal Violence, and International Law, The’ (2003) 36 NYUJ Int’l. L. & Pol. 331Google Scholar

Dupuy, P, ‘Reviewing the Difficulties of Codification: On Ago’s Classification of Obligations of Means and Obligations of Result in Relation to State Responsibility’ (1999) 10 Eur. J. Int. Law 371Google Scholar

Dupuy, P-M, ‘The International Law of State Responsibility: Revolution or Evolution?’ (1989) 11 Mich. J. Int’l L.Google Scholar

Dupuy, P-M, ‘Soft Law and the International Law of the Environment’ (1991) 12 Mich. J. Int’l L.Google Scholar

Dupuy, P-M, ‘Prosper Weil’s Article: A Stimulating Warning’ (2020) 114 AJIL Unbound 72Google Scholar

Epstein, RA and Rose, AM, ‘The Regulation of Sovereign Wealth Funds: The Virtues of Going Slow’ (2009) 76 U. Chi. L. Rev. 111Google Scholar

Feit, M, ‘Responsibility of the State under International Law for the Breach of Contract Committed by a State-Owned Entity’ (2010) 28 Berkeley J. Int’l L. 142Google Scholar

Feit, M, ‘Attribution and the Umbrella Clause: Is There a Way out of the Deadlock’ (2012) 21 Minn. J. Int’l L. 21Google Scholar

Finke, J, ‘Sovereign Immunity: Rule, Comity or Something Else?’ (2010) 21 Eur. J. Int. Law 853Google Scholar

Forcese, C, ‘“Militarized Commerce” in Sudan’s Oilfields: Lessons for Canadian Foreign Policy’ (2001) 8 Can. Foreign Policy J. 37Google Scholar

Fortineaux, E, ‘Fight against the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative, The’ (2013) 11 Loy. U. Chi. Int’l L. Rev. 65Google Scholar

Friedmann, W, ‘International Public Corporations’ (1943) 6 Mod. L. Rev. 185Google Scholar

Friedmann, W, ‘The Legal Status and Organization of the Public Corporation’ (1951) 16 Law & Contemp. Probs. 576Google Scholar

Friedmann, W, ‘Some Impacts of Social Organisation on International Law’ (1956) 50(3) Am. J. Int. Law 475Google Scholar

Friedmann, W, ‘Changing Social Arrangements in State-Trading States and Their Effect on International Law’ (1959) 24 Law & Contemp. Probs. 350Google Scholar

Federico, G and Tena-Junguito, A, ‘A Tale of Two Globalizations: Gains from Trade and Openness 1800–2010’ (2017) 153 Rev. World Econ. 601Google Scholar

Gaeta, P, ‘The Super-Normativity of International Criminal Law’ (2020) 114 AJIL Unbound 82Google Scholar

Galai, K, ‘Companies of Past and Present: Lessons from the East Indian Company on the Use and Regulation of Private Forces Today’ (2016) 4 Legal Issues J. 1Google Scholar

Gallo, D, ‘The Rise of Sovereign Wealth Funds (SWFs) and the Protection of Public Interest (s): The Need for a Greater External and Internal Action of the European Union’ (2016) 27 Eur. Bus. Law Rev. 459Google Scholar

Gallus, N, ‘State Enterprises as Organs of the State and BIT Claims’ (2006) 7 JWIT 761Google Scholar

Garcia Sanchez, GJ, ‘A Critical Approach to International Investment Law, the Hydrocarbons Industry, and Its Relation to Domestic Institutions’ (2016) 57 Harv. Int’l L.J. 475Google Scholar

García-Salmones Rovira, M, ‘What Is Positivism Today?’ (2020) 114 AJIL Unbound 87Google Scholar

Gathii, J and Puig, S, ‘Introduction to the Symposium on Investor Responsibility: The Next Frontier in International Investment Law’ (2019) 113 AJIL Unbound 1Google Scholar

Gavison, R, ‘Feminism and the Public/Private Distinction’ (1992) 45 Stan. Law Rev. 1Google Scholar

Gerber, P, Kyriakakis, J and O’Byrne, K, ‘General Comment No. 16 on State Obligations Regarding the Impact of the Business Sector on Children’s Rights: What Is Its Standing, Meaning and Effect’ (2013) 14 Melb. J. Int’l L. 93Google Scholar

Gibney, M, Tomasevski, K and Vedsted-Hansen, J, ‘Transnational State Responsibility for Violations of Human Rights’ (1999) 12 Harv. Hum. Rts. J. 267Google Scholar

Gillies, A and Heuty, A, ‘Does Transparency Work: The Challenges of Measurement and Effectiveness in Resource-Rich Countries’ (2011) 6 Yale J. Int’l Aff. 25Google Scholar

Gilson, RJ and Milhaupt, CJ, ‘Sovereign Wealth Funds and Corporate Governance: A Minimalist Response to the New Mercantilism’ (2007) 60 Stan. L. Rev. 1345Google Scholar

Goldmann, M, ‘A Matter of Perspective: Global Governance and the Distinction between Public and Private Authority (and Not Law)’ (2016) 5 GlobCon 48Google Scholar

Guttman, D and others, ‘Environmental Governance in China: Interactions between the State and “Nonstate Actors”’ (2018) 220 J. Environ. Manage. 126Google Scholar

Hackett, C and Moffett, L, ‘Mapping the Public/Private-Law Divide: A Hybrid Approach to Corporate Accountability’ (2016) 12 Int. J. Law Context. 312Google Scholar

Hart, O, Shleifer, A and Vishny, RW, ‘The Proper Scope of Government: Theory and an Application to Prisons’ (1997) 112 Q. J. Econ. 1127Google Scholar

Hazard, JN, ‘State Trading in History and Theory’ (1959) 24 Law & Contemp. Probs. 243Google Scholar

Heller, MA, ‘The Tragedy of the Anticommons: Property in the Transition from Marx to Markets’ (1998) 111 Harv. L. Rev. 621Google Scholar

Henry, WM Jr, ‘Litigating Global Warming: Substantive Law in Search of a Forum’ (2004) 16 Fordham Envtl. L. Rev. 371Google Scholar

Hessbruegge, JA, ‘The Historical Development of the Doctrines of Attribution and Due Diligence in International Law’ (2003) 36 NYUJ Int’l. L. & Pol. 265Google Scholar

Hillgenberg, H, ‘A Fresh Look at Soft Law’ (1999) 10 Eur. J. Int. Law 499Google Scholar

Holcombe, K, ‘JASTA Straw Man: How the Justice against Sponsors of Terrorism Act Undermines Our Security and Its Stated Purpose’ (2017) 25 Am. U.J. Gender Soc. Pol’y & Law 359Google Scholar

Horwitz, MJ, ‘The History of the Public/Private Distinction’ (1982) 130 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1423Google Scholar

Hu, S., ‘Clash of Identifications: State Enterprises in International Law’ 19 UC Davis Bus. L.J. 171Google Scholar

Hyclak, TJ and King, AE, ‘The Privatisation Experience in Eastern Europe’ (1994) 17 World Econ. 529Google Scholar

Jachtenfuchs, M and Krisch, N, ‘Subsidiarity in Global Governance’ (2016) 79 Law & Contemp. Probs. 1Google Scholar

Jarvis, RM, ‘The Tate Letter: Some Words Regarding Its Authorship’ (2015) 55 Am. J. Legal Hist. 465Google Scholar

Kaeb, C and Scheffer, D, ‘The Paradox of Kiobel in Europe’ (2013) 107 Am. J. Int. Law 852Google Scholar

Kelly, M, ‘Ending Corporate Impunity for Genocide: The Case against China’s State-Owned Petroleum Company in Sudan’ (2011) 90 Or. L. Rev. 413Google Scholar

Kennedy, D, ‘The Stages of the Decline of the Public/Private Distinction’ (1981) 130 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1349Google Scholar

Klabbers, J, ‘The Redundancy of Soft Law’ (1996) 65 Nord. J. Int. Law 167Google Scholar

Klare, KE, ‘The Public/Private Distinction in Labor Law’ (1982) 130 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1358Google Scholar

KløCker Larsen, R and Atler, S, ‘Applying the First Pillar of the UN Guiding Principles to Development Cooperation: The Performance of Swedish Agencies and State-Owned Enterprises’ (2018) 3 BHRJ 131Google Scholar

Knop, K, ‘Introduction to the Symposium on Prosper Weil, “Towards Relative Normativity in International Law?”’ (2020) 114 AJIL Unbound 67Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, M, ‘Global Governance and Public International Law’ (2004) 37 Kritische Justiz 241Google Scholar

Kotter, J and Lel, U, ‘Friends or Foes? Target Selection Decisions of Sovereign Wealth Funds and Their Consequences’ (2011) 101 J. Financ. Econ. 360Google Scholar

Krajewski, M ‘The State Duty to Protect against Human Rights Violations through Transnational Business Activities’ (2018) 23 Deakin L. Rev. 13Google Scholar

Lauterpacht, H, ‘The Problem of Jurisdictional Immunities of Foreign States’ (1951) 28 Brit. YB Int’l L. 220Google Scholar

Le Moli, G, ‘The Human Rights Committee, Environmental Protection and the Right to Life’ (2020) 69 Int. Comp. Law Q. 735Google Scholar

Lee, J, ‘State Responsibility and Government-Affiliated Entities in International Economic Law: The Danger of Blurring the Chinese Wall between “State Organ” and “Non-State Organ” as Designed in the ILC Draft Articles’ (2015) 49 J. World Trade 117Google Scholar

Lerrick, A, ‘Venezuela’s Debt: Untying the PDVSA Knot’ (2018) 13 Cap. Mark. Law J. 131Google Scholar

Li, T and Belal, A, ‘Authoritarian State, Global Expansion and Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting: The Narrative of a Chinese State-Owned Enterprise’ (2018) 42 Account. Forum 199Google Scholar

Lin, L-W and Milhaupt, CJ, ‘We Are the (National) Champions: Understanding the Mechanisms of State Capitalism in China’ (2013) 65 Stan. L. Rev. 697Google Scholar

Loncle, J-M and Morel, J-B, ‘Emanations of States and ICSID Arbitration’ (2008) Int’l Bus. L.J. 29Google Scholar

Macchi, C, ‘Right to Water and the Threat of Business: Corporate Accountability and the State’s Duty to Protect’ (2017) 35 Nord. J. Hum. Rights 186Google Scholar

Malekos Smith, JZ, ‘No State Is an Island in Cyberspace’ (2016) 5 J.L. & Cyber Warfare 4Google Scholar

Marquis, C and Qian, C, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting in China: Symbol or Substance?’ (2014) 25 Organ. Sci. 127Google Scholar

Marquis, C, Yin, J and Yang, D, ‘State-Mediated Globalization Processes and the Adoption of Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting in China’ (2017) 13 Manag. Organ. Rev. 167Google Scholar

Martin-Ortega, O, ‘Public Procurement as a Tool for the Protection and Promotion of Human Rights: A Study of Collaboration, Due Diligence and Leverage in the Electronics Industry’ (2018) 3 BHRJ 75Google Scholar

Martin-Ortega, O and O’Brien, CM, ‘Advancing Respect for Labour Rights Globally through Public Procurement’ (2017) 5 Politics Gov. 69Google Scholar

Marx, A, ‘The Public-Private Distinction in Global Governance: How Relevant Is It in the Case of Voluntary Sustainability Standards?’ (2017) 3 CJGG 1Google Scholar

Maupin, JA, ‘Public and Private in International Investment Law: An Integrated Systems Approach’ (2013) 54 Va. J. Int’l L. 367Google Scholar

McCorquodale, R, ‘An Inclusive International Legal System’ (2004) 17 Leiden J. Int. Law 477Google Scholar

McCorquodale, R, ‘Beyond State Sovereignty: The International Legal System and Non-State Participants’ (2006) Revista Colombiana de Derecho International 103Google Scholar

McCorquodale, R, ‘Waving Not Drowning: Kiobel Outside the United States’ (2013) 107 Am. J. Int. Law 846Google Scholar

McCorquodale, R, ‘Human Rights Due Diligence in Law and Practice: Good Practices and Challenges for Business Enterprises’ (2017) 2 BHRJ 195Google Scholar

McCorquodale, R and Simons, P, ‘Responsibility Beyond Borders: State Responsibility for Extraterritorial Violations by Corporations of International Human Rights Law’ (2007) 70 Mod. L. Rev. 598Google Scholar

McGregor, L, ‘State Immunity and Human Rights: Is There a Future after Germany v. Italy?’ (2013) 11 J. Int. Crim. Justice 125Google Scholar

McIntyre, O, ‘The Proceduralisation and Growing Maturity of International Water Law: Case concerning Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay (Argentina v Uruguay), International Court of Justice, 20 April 2010’ (2010) 22 J. Environ. Law 475Google Scholar

Methven, O’Brien C, ‘The Home State Duty to Regulate the Human Rights Impacts of TNCs Abroad: A Rebuttal’ (2018) 3 BHRJ 47Google Scholar

Milanovic, M, ‘Special Rules of Attribution of Conduct in International Law’ (2020) 96 Int. Law Stud. 295Google Scholar

Milin, Z, ‘Mapping Recent Developments in Transparency of Extractive Industries’ (2016) 1 BHRJ 321Google Scholar

Mizsei, K, ‘Privatisation in Eastern Europe: A Comparative Study of Poland and Hungary’ (1992) 44 Sov. Stud. 283Google Scholar

Mnookin, RH, ‘Public/Private Dichotomy: Political Disagreement and Academic Repudiation’ (1981) 130 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1429Google Scholar

Morris, PS, ‘Lex Internationalis: Kiobel, Empires, and the Color of Human Rights’ (2015) 7 Geo. J.L. & Mod. Critical Race Persp. 71Google Scholar

Norton, JJ, ‘The Santiago Principles and the International Forum of Sovereign Wealth Funds: Evolving Components of the New Bretton Woods II Post-Global Financial Crisis Architecture and Another Example of Ad Hoc Global Administrative Networking and Related Soft Rulemaking’ (2009) 29 Rev. Banking & Fin. L. 465Google Scholar

Nayyar, D, ‘Globalisation, History and Development: A Tale of Two Centuries’ (2006) 30 Camb. J. Econ. 137Google Scholar

Odudu, O, ‘The Public/Private Distinction in EU Internal Market Law’ (2003) 62 ECLR 62Google Scholar

Ofodile, UE, ‘Trade, Empires, and Subjects-China-Africa Trade: A New Fair-Trade Arrangement, or the Third Scramble for Africa’ (2008) 41 Vand. J. Transnat’l L. 505Google Scholar

Olsen, FE, ‘The Family and the Market: A Study of Ideology and Legal Reform’ (1983) Harv. L. Rev. 1497Google Scholar

Orakhelashvili, A, ‘Case Note on Jurisdictional Immunities of the State’ (2012) 106 Am. J. Int. Law 609Google Scholar

Page, J, ‘Common Property and the Age of Aquarius’ (2010) 19 Griffith L. Rev. 172Google Scholar

Payne, T, ‘Teaching Old Law New Tricks: Applying and Adapting State Responsibility to Cyber Operations’ (2016) 20 Lewis & Clark L. Rev. 683Google Scholar

Pellet, A, ‘The Normative Dilemma: Will and Consent in International Law-Making’ (1992) 12 AYBIL 22Google Scholar

Peng, MW and others, ‘Theories of the (State-Owned) Firm’ (2016) 33 Asia Pac. J. Manag. 293Google Scholar

Perera, SM, ‘State Responsibility: Ascertaining the Liability of States in Foreign Investment Disputes’ (2005) 6 JWIT 499Google Scholar

Perruso, R, ‘Development of the Doctrine of Res Communes in Medieval and Early Modern Europe, The’ (2002) 70 Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis 69Google Scholar

Philip, G, ‘When Oil Prices Were Low: Petroleos de Venezuela (PdVSA) and Economic Policy-Making in Venezuela since 1989’ (1999) 18 Bull. Lat. Am. Res. 361Google Scholar

Pisillo-Mazzeschi, R, ‘The Due Diligence Rule and the Nature of the International Responsibility of States’ 35 Ger. Yearb. Int. Law 9Google Scholar

Posner, EA and Sykes, AO, ‘An Economic Analysis of State and Individual Responsibility under International Law’ (2007) 9 Am. L. & Econ. Rev. 72Google Scholar

Pugh, GW, ‘Historical Approach to the Doctrine of Sovereign Immunity’ (1953) 13 La. L. Rev. 476Google Scholar

Qiu, J, ‘Quality of CSR Reporting in China: A Comparative Analysis between State- and Privately-Owned Real Estate Companies’ (2017) 50 SIRE 38Google Scholar

Rajavuori, M, ‘How Should States Own? Heinisch v. Germany and the Emergence of Human Rights-Sensitive State Ownership Function’ (2015) 26 Eur. J. Int. Law 727Google Scholar

Rajavuori, M, ‘State Ownership and the United Nations Business and Human Rights Agenda: Three Instruments, Three Narratives’ (2016) 23 Indiana J. Glob. Leg. Stud. 665Google Scholar

Rajavuori, M, ‘Making International Legal Persons in Investment Treaty Arbitration: State-Owned Enterprises Along the Person/Thing Distinction’ (2017) 18 Ger. Law J.Google Scholar

Rajavuori, M, ‘Governing the Good State Shareholder: The Case of the OECD Guidelines on Corporate Governance of State-Owned Enterprises’ (2018) 29 Eur. Bus. Law Rev. 103Google Scholar

Rasche, A and others, ‘Which Firms Leave Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives? An Analysis of Delistings from the United Nations Global Compact’ (2020) Regul. and Gov. < https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12322>>Google Scholar

Ratner, SR, ‘Corporations and Human Rights: A Theory of Legal Responsibility’ (2001) 111 Yale L.J. 443Google Scholar

Ratner, SR, ‘Introduction to the Symposium on Soft and Hard Law on Business and Human Rights’ (2020) 114 AJIL Unbound 163Google Scholar

Raymond, H, ‘Sovereign Wealth Funds as Domestic Investors of Last Resort during Crises’ (2010) 123 Int. Econ. 121Google Scholar

Romany, C, ‘Women as Aliens: A Feminist Critique of the Public/Private Distinction in International Human Rights Law’ (1993) 6 Harv. Hum. Rts. J. 87Google Scholar

Rose, P, ‘Sovereigns as Shareholders’ (2008) 87 N.C. L. Rev. 83Google Scholar

Ruggie, JG and Sherman, JF, ‘The Concept of “Due Diligence” in the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: A Reply to Jonathan Bonnitcha and Robert McCorquodale’ (2017) 28 Eur. J. Int. Law 921Google Scholar

Schachter, O, ‘The Twilight Existence of Nonbinding International Agreements’ (1977) 71 Am. J. Int. Law 296Google Scholar

Schicho, L, ‘Attribution and State Entities: Diverging Approaches in Investment Arbitration’ (2011) 12 JWIT 283Google Scholar

Schmitt, M and Vihul, L, ‘Proxy Wars in Cyberspace: The Evolving International Law of Attribution’ (2014) 1 Fletcher Sec. Rev. 53Google Scholar

Schönsteiner, J, ‘Attribution of State Responsibility for Actions or Omissions of State-Owned Enterprises in Human Rights Matters’ (2019) 40 U. Pa. J. Int’l L. 42Google Scholar

Seck, SL, ‘Home State Responsibility and Local Communities: The Case of Global Mining’ (2014) 11 Yale Hum. Rts. & Dev. L.J. 10Google Scholar

Shackelford, SJ, Russell, S and Kuehn, A, ‘Unpacking the International Law on Cybersecurity Due Diligence: Lessons from the Public and Private Sectors’ (2016) 17 Chi. J. Int’l L. 1Google Scholar

Shaffer, GC and Pollack, MA, ‘Hard vs. Soft Law: Alternatives, Complements, and Antagonists in International Governance’ (2010) 94 Minn. L. Rev. 706Google Scholar

Shamir, H, ‘The Public/Private Distinction Now: The Challenges of Privatization and of the Regulatory State’ (2014) 15 Theor. Inq. Law 1Google Scholar

Simma, B, ‘Of Planets and the Universe: Self-Contained Regimes in International Law’ (2006) 17 Eur. J. Int. Law 483Google Scholar

Sovacool, BK and others, ‘Energy Governance, Transnational Rules, and the Resource Curse: Exploring the Effectiveness of the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI)’ (2016) 83 World Dev. 179Google Scholar

Stebek, EN, ‘Conceptual Foundations of Property Rights: Rethinking De Facto Rural Open Access to Common-Pool Resources in Ethiopia’ (2011) 5 Mizan L. Rev. 1Google Scholar

Stone, CD, ‘Corporate Vices and Corporate Virtues: Do Public/Private Distinctions Matter?’ (1982) 130 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1441Google Scholar

Stoyanova, V, ‘Fault, Knowledge and Risk within the Framework of Positive Obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights’ (2020) Leiden J. Int. Law 1Google Scholar

Takano, A, ‘Due Diligence Obligations and Transboundary Environmental Harm: Cybersecurity Applications’ (2018) 7 Laws 36Google Scholar

Tasioulas, J, ‘Prosper Weil and the Mask of Classicism’ (2020) 114 AJIL Unbound 92Google Scholar

Tejera, V, ‘The US Law Regime of Sovereign Immunity and the Sovereign Wealth Funds’ (2016) 25 U. Miami Bus. L. Rev. 1Google Scholar

Thomas, N, ‘Regulating Sovereign Wealth Funds through Contract’ (2013) 24 Duke J. Comp. & Int’l L. 459Google Scholar

Tsagourias, N and Farrell, M, ‘Cyber Attribution: Technical and Legal Approaches and Challenges’ (2020) 31 Eur. J. Int. Law 23Google Scholar

Tsikata, DA, ‘The International Public Corporation: A Concept More Relevant Than Ever?’ (2017) 14 Int. Organ. L. Rev. 120Google Scholar

Van der Vyver, JD, ‘Ownership in Constitutional and International Law’ (1985) Acta Juridica 119Google Scholar

Van Harten, G, ‘The Public–Private Distinction in the International Arbitration of Individual Claims against the State’ (2007) 56 Int. Comp. Law Q. 371Google Scholar

Vázquez, CM, ‘Direct vs. Indirect Obligations of Corporations under International Law’ 43 Colum. J. Transnat’l Law 928Google Scholar

Villapando, S, ‘Attribution of Conduct to the State: How the Rules of State Responsibility May Be Applied within the WTO Dispute Settlement System’ (2002) J. Int. Econ. Law 393Google Scholar

Weil, P, ‘Towards Relative Normativity in International Law’ (1983) 77 Am. J. Int. LawGoogle Scholar

Werhane, PH, ‘Corporate Moral Agency and the Responsibility to Respect Human Rights in the UN Guiding Principles: Do Corporations Have Moral Rights?’ (2016) 1 BHRJ 5Google Scholar

Willis, HE, ‘Capitalism, The United States Constitution and the Supreme Court’ (1934) XXII Ky. L.J. 343Google Scholar

Wong, A, ‘Sovereign Wealth Funds and the Problem of Asymmetric Information: The Santiago Principles and International Regulations’ (2008) 34 Brook. J. Int’l L. 1081Google Scholar

Xili, M, ‘Advancing Direct Corporate Accountability in International Human Rights Law: The Role of State-Owned Enterprises’ (2019) 14 Front. Law China 43Google Scholar

Xu, D, Wang, L and Liu, J, ‘Assessing the Social Performance of State-Owned Forest Farms in China: Integrating Forest Social Values and Corporate Social Responsibility Approaches’ (2017) 32 Scand. J. For. Res. 338Google Scholar

Xun, A, Hanrui, B and Xiaoyang, Z, ‘A DEA Approach to Evaluate Economical and Social Roles of NOCs’ (2011) 5 Energy Procedia 763Google Scholar

Yee, S, ‘The International Law of Co-Progressiveness as a Response to the Problems Associated with “Relative Normativity”’ (2020) 114 AJIL Unbound 97Google Scholar

Yu, X, ‘State Legalism and the Public/Private Divide in Chinese Legal Development’ (2014) 15 Theor. Inq. Law 27Google Scholar

Zhang, M, ‘From Public to Private: The Newly Enacted Chinese Property Law and the Protection of Property Rights in China’ (2008) 5 Berkeley Bus. Law J. 317Google Scholar

Zhu, J, ‘The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and China’s Implementation’ (2017) 15 CJPRE 142Google Scholar

‘Annual Report on the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises 2016’ (OECD 2017)Google Scholar

Augenstein, D, ‘State Responsibilities to Regulate and Adjudicate Corporate Activities under the European Convention on Human Rights’ (2011) Submission to the Special Representative of the United Nations Secretary-General (SRSG) on the Issue of Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and Other Business EnterprisesGoogle Scholar

Bortolotti, B and Fotak, V, ‘The Rise of Sovereign Wealth Funds: Definition, Organisation and Governance’ [2014] BAFFI Center Research Paper Series No. 2014-163 26Google Scholar

Capobianco, A and Christiansen, H, ‘Competitive Neutrality and State-Owned Enterprises’ (2011) OECD Corporate Governance Working Papers 1Google Scholar

Christiansen, H, ‘Balancing Commercial and Non-Commercial Priorities of State-Owned Enterprises’ (2013) OECD Corporate Governance Working Papers 6Google Scholar

Clapham, A and Rubio, MG, ‘The Obligations of States with Regard to Non-State Actors in the Context of the Right to Health’ (2002) Health and Human Rights Working Paper SeriesGoogle Scholar

De Schutter, O, ‘Human Rights Due Diligence: The Role of States’Google Scholar

‘Diverse and Value-Creating Ownership’ (2014) Meld. St. 27 (2013–2014) Report to the Storting (white paper) Recommendation of the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Fisheries of 20 June 2014, approved in the Council of State the same day. (The Solberg Government) <https://www.regjeringen.no/en/dokumenter/meld.-st.-27-2013-2014/id763968/>>Google Scholar

‘Draft Report with Recommendations to the Commission on Corporate Due Diligence and Corporate Accountability’ (European Parliament, Committee on Legal Affairs 2020) 2020/2129(INL)Google Scholar

EITI International Secretariat, ‘Chinese Companies Reporting in EITI Countries: Review of the Engagement of Chinese Firms in Countries Implementing the EITI’ (2016)Google Scholar

Expert meeting on the role of states in regulating and adjudicating the activities of corporations with respect to human rights, organized by the Special Representative of the UN Secretary-General on Business and Human Rights and the Danish section of the International, and Commission of Jurists, ‘The Role of States in Effectively Regulating and Adjudicating the Activities of Corporations with Respect to Human Rights’Google Scholar

Finnish Ministry of Employment and the Economy (46/2014), ‘National Action Plan for the Implementation of the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights’Google Scholar

‘First Report Submitted to the Council by the Preparatory Committee for the Codification’ (Preparatory Committee for the Codification Conference (Conference for the Codification of International Law) 1930)Google Scholar

Fox, H, ‘Resolution on the Immunity from Jurisdiction of the State and of Persons Who Act on Behalf of the State in Case of International Crimes (Napoli Session)’ (Institut de Droit International 2009)Google Scholar

French, D and Stephens, T, ‘ILA Study Group on Due Diligence in International Law (First Report)’ (International Law Association 2014)Google Scholar

French, D (Chair) and Stephens, T ‘ILA Study Group on Due Diligence in International Law (Second Report)’ (International Law Association 2016)Google Scholar

Government of Finland, ‘Government Ownership Steering: Financial Annual Report 2015’ (2015) <vnk.fi/government-ownership-steering>>Google Scholar

Government of Sweden, Ministry of Enterprise and Innovation, ‘The State’s Ownership Policy and Guidelines for State-Owned Enterprises 2017’ <https://www.government.se/reports/2017/06/the-states-ownership-policy-and-guidelines-for-state-owned-enterprises-2017/>>Google Scholar

Heller, PRP, Mahdavi, P and Schreuder, J, ‘Reforming National Oil Companies: Nine Recommendations’ Natural Resource Governance Institute, Research Paper (July 2014)Google Scholar

Human Rights Council, ‘Towards Operationalizing the “Protect, Respect and Remedy” Framework; Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the Issue of Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises’ (2009) A/HRC/11/13Google Scholar

Human Rights Council, ‘Report of the Working Group on the Issue of Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises’ (2013) A/HRC/23/32/Add.2Google Scholar

Human Rights Council, ‘Report of the Working Group on the Issue of Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises’ (Human Rights Council, Seventeenth Session, Agenda Item 3 2016) A/HRC/32/45Google Scholar

‘Implementing the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises: The National Contact Points from 2000 to 2015’ (OECD 2016)Google Scholar

‘Indigenous and Tribal Peoples’ Rights over Their Ancestral Lands and Natural Resources: Norms and Jurisprudence of the Inter-American Human Rights System’ (Inter-American Commission on Human Rights 2009) OEA/Ser.L/V/II. Doc. 56/09Google Scholar

Institute for Human Rights and Business, ‘Protecting Rights by Purchasing Right: The Human Rights Provisions, Opportunities and Limitations under the 2014 EU Public Procurement Directives’ (2015)Google Scholar

International Labour Organisation, ‘Report III (Part 1B): General Survey concerning the Labour Clauses (Public Contracts) Convention 1949 (No. 84)’ (International Labour Office 2008)Google Scholar

International Law Commission, ‘Report of the International Law Commission on the Work of Its Twenty-Sixth Session, 6 May–26 July 1974, Official Records of the General Assembly, Twenty-Ninth Session, Supplement No. 10’ (1974) A/9610/Rev.1Google Scholar

International Law Commission, ‘Yearbook of the International Law Commission: Documents of the Twenty-Sixth Session: Reports of Special Rapporteurs, Other Documents Submitted by Members of the Commission and Report of the Commission to the General Assembly’ (1974) A/CN.4/SER.A/1974/Add.l (Part 1)Google Scholar

International Law Commission, ‘First Report on State Responsibility, by Mr. James Crawford, Special Rapporteur’ (1998) DOCUMENT A/CN.4/490 and Add. 1–7*Google Scholar

International Law Commission, Draft Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts, with Commentaries (Yearbook of the International Law Commission, Vol II, Part Two 2001)Google Scholar

International Law Commission, ‘Draft Conclusions on Identification of Customary International Law, with Commentaries, 2018 (A/73/10)’ (2018)Google Scholar

International Monetary Fund, Fiscal Monitor: Policies to Support People during the COVID-19 Pandemic (Washington, April 2020)Google Scholar

Krajewski, M and others, ‘Human Rights Due Diligence Legislation – Options for the EU’ (European Union, Policy Department for External Relations 2020)Google Scholar

Lagoutte, S, ‘The State Duty to Protect against Business-Related Human Rights Abuses. Unpacking Pillar 1 and 3 of the UN Guiding Principles on Human Rights and Business’ (Danish Institute for Human Rights 2014) 2014/1Google Scholar

‘Leading by Example: The State, State-Owned Enterprises and Human Rights (Report of the Working Group on the Issue of Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises)’ (2016) A/HRC/32/45Google Scholar

‘List of Issues and Questions in Relation to the Combined Eighth and Ninth Periodic Reports of Portugal’ (Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women 2015) CEDAW/C/PRT/Q/8–9Google Scholar

McCorquodale, R, ‘Survey of the Provision in the United Kingdom of Access to Remedies for Victims of Human Rights Harms Involving Business Enterprises’ (British Institute of International and Comparative Law 2015)Google Scholar

Methven, O’Brien C and Martin-Ortega, O, ‘The Role of the State as Buyer under UN Guiding Principle 6 (Submission to UN Working Group on Business and Human Rights Consultation on “The State as an Economic Actor: The Role of Economic Diplomacy Tools to Promote Business Respect of Human Rights”)’ [2018] University of Groningen Faculty of Law Research Paper Series No. 14/2018Google Scholar

Morrison, J and St. Dennis, H, ‘State of Play: Human Rights in the Political Economy of States: Avenues for Application’ (Institute for Human Rights and Business 2014) <https://www.ihrb.org/pdf/2014-03-18_State-of-Play_HR-Political-Economy-States.pdf>>Google Scholar

Musacchio, A and Lazzarini, SG, ‘Leviathan in Business: Varieties of State Capitalism and Their Implications for Economic Performance’ [2012] Harvard Business School Working Paper, No. 12–108, June 2012Google Scholar

‘OHCHR | State National Action Plans on Business and Human Rights’ <https://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Business/Pages/NationalActionPlans.aspx> accessed 10 August 2020+accessed+10+August+2020>Google Scholar

‘OHCHR | Working Group Surveys on Implementation of the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights’ <https://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Business/Pages/ImplementationGP.aspx> accessed 18 August 2020+accessed+18+August+2020>Google Scholar

‘Opportunities for All: Human Rights in Norway’s Foreign Policy and Development Cooperation’ (2014) Meld. St. 10 (2014–2015) Report to the Storting (white paper)Google Scholar

‘Outcome of the Seventh Session of the Working Group on the Issue of Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises (A/HRC/WG.12/7/1)’Google Scholar

‘Remarks by SRSG John Ruggie “Engaging Export Credit Agencies in Respecting Human Rights” OECD Export Credit Group’s “Common Approaches” Meeting’Google Scholar

‘Report of the International Law Commission’ (International Law Commission 1999) A/54/10Google Scholar

‘Report of the Working Group on the Issue of Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises (A/HRC/32/45)’Google Scholar

Ruggie, JG, ‘Promotion and Protection of Human Rights (Interim Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the Issue of Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises)’ (2006) E/CN.4/2006/97Google Scholar

Ruggie, JG, ‘Corporate Responsibility under International Law and Issues in Extraterritorial Regulation: Summary of Legal Workshops (Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the Issue of Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises)’ (2007) A/HRC/4/35/Add.2Google Scholar

Ruggie, JG, ‘State Responsibilities to Regulate and Adjudicate Corporate Activities under the United Nations Core Human Rights Treaties: An Overview of Treaty Body Commentaries (Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the Issue of Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises)’ (2007) A/HRC/4/35/Add.1Google Scholar

Ruggie, JG, ‘State Responsibilities to Regulate and Adjudicate Corporate Activities under the United Nations’ Core Human Rights Treaties (Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the Issue of Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises)’ (John F Kennedy School of Government 2007)Google Scholar

Ruggie, JG, ‘Protect, Respect and Remedy: A Framework for Business and Human Rights (Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the Issue of Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises, John Ruggie)’ (2008) A/HRC/8/5Google Scholar

Ruggie, JG, ‘Corporations and Human Rights: A Survey of the Scope and Patterns of Alleged Corporate-Related Human Rights Abuse (Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the Issue of Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises)’ (2008) A/HRC/8/5/Add.2Google Scholar

Ruggie, JG, ‘Summary of Five Multi-Stakeholder Consultations (Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the Issue of Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises)’ (2008) A/HRC/8/5/Add.1Google Scholar

Ruggie, JG, ‘State Obligations to Provide Access to Remedy for Human Rights Abuses by Third Parties, Including Business: An Overview of International and Regional Provisions, Commentary and Decisions (Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the Issue of Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises, John Ruggie)’ (2009) A/HRC/11/13/Add.1Google Scholar

Ruggie, JG, ‘Business and Human Rights: Further Steps toward the Operationalization of the “Protect, Respect and Remedy” Framework (Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the Issue of Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises, John Ruggie’ (2010) A/HRC/14/27Google Scholar

Ruggie, JG, ‘Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: Implementing the United Nations “Protect, Respect and Remedy” Framework (Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the Issue of Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises)’ (2011) A/HRC/17/31Google Scholar

Ruggie, JG, ‘Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: Implementing the United Nations “Protect, Respect and Remedy” Framework (Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the Issue of Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises, John Ruggie)’ (Human Rights Council, Seventeenth Session, Agenda Item 3 2011) A/HRC/17/31Google Scholar

Ruggie, JG, ‘Human Rights and Corporate Law: Trends and Observations from a Crossnational Study Conducted by the Special Representative (Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the Issue of Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises, John Ruggie)’ (2011) A/HRC/17/31/Add.2Google Scholar

Sachs, JD and Warner, AM, ‘Natural Resource Abundance and Economic Growth’ (National Bureau of Economic Research 1995)Google Scholar

Sartori, N, ‘The European Commission’s Policy towards the Southern Gas Corridor: Between National Interests and Economic Fundamentals’, IAI Working Papers 12/01 January 2012Google Scholar

Shahab, Y, Ntim, CG and Ullah, F, ‘The Brighter Side of Being Socially Responsible: CSR Ratings and Financial Distress among Chinese State and Non-State Owned Firms’ (2018) Applied Economics Letters < https://doi:%2010.1080/13504851.2018.1450480>>Google Scholar

Sucharitkul, S, ‘Fifth Report on Jurisdictional Immunities of States and Their Property (UN Doc. A/CN.4/363 and Add.1*, 22 March and 11 April 1983)’ (Yearbook of the International Law Commission 1983)Google Scholar

Szamosszegi, A and Cole, K, ‘An Analysis of State-Owned Enterprises and State Capitalism in China’ (US-China Economic and Security Review Commission 2011)Google Scholar

‘The State’s Direct Ownership of Companies: Sustainable Value Creation’ The State’s Direct Ownership of Companies Meld. St. 8 (2019–2020) Report to the Storting (white paper)Google Scholar

UNCTAD, ‘World Investment Report 2007: Transnational Corporations, Extractive Industries and Development’ (United Nations 2007)Google Scholar

UNCTAD, ‘World Investment Report 2014: Investing in the SDGs: An Action Plan’ (United Nations 2014)Google Scholar

UNCTAD, ‘World Investment Report 2017: Investment and the Digital Economy’ (United Nations 2017)Google Scholar

UNCTAD, ‘World Investment Report 2017: Investment and the Digital Economy (Methodological Note)’ (2017)Google Scholar

‘UNCTAD’s Reform Package for the International Investment Regime (2018 Edition)’Google Scholar

World Bank, Corporate Governance of State-Owned Enterprises: A Toolkit (2014)Google Scholar

China Chamber of Commerce of Metals, Minerals & Chemicals Importers & Exporters, ‘CCMCMC Guidelines for Social Responsibility in Outbound Mining Investments’ (2014)Google Scholar

EITI International Secretariat, ‘The EITI Standard 2016’ (EITI 2016)Google Scholar

EITI International Secretariat, ‘EITI Standard 2019’Google Scholar

‘FIFA’s Human Rights Policy’ (May 2017 Edition)Google Scholar

G20/OECD Principles of Corporate Governance 2015 (OECD 2015)Google Scholar

‘Guidelines to the State-Owned Enterprises Directly under the Central Government’ <http://en.sasac.gov.cn/2011/12/06/c_313.htm> accessed 18 August 2020+accessed+18+August+2020>Google Scholar

Guidelines on Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability for Central Public Sector Enterprises (India)Google Scholar

OECD, Accountability and Transparency: A Guide for State Ownership (OECD 2010)Google Scholar

OECD, Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises, 2011 Edition (OECD 2011)Google Scholar

OECD, Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas (17 July 2012)Google Scholar

OECD, Boards of Directors of State-Owned Enterprises: An Overview of National Practices (OECD 2013)Google Scholar

OECD, Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas (OECD 2013)Google Scholar

OECD, Competition Assessment Toolkit Volume III: Operational Manual (Version 3, 2015)Google Scholar

OECD, Due Diligence Guidance for Meaningful Stakeholder Engagement in the Extractive Sector (4 December 2015)Google Scholar

OECD, OECD Guidelines on Corporate Governance of State-Owned Enterprises (OECD 2015)Google Scholar

OECD, Policy Framework for Investment, 2015 Edition (OECD 2015)Google Scholar

OECD, State-Owned Enterprise Governance: A Stocktaking of Government Rationales for State Ownership (2015)Google Scholar

OECD, Common Approaches for Officially Supported Export Credits and Environmental and Social Due Diligence (TAD/ECG(2016)3) 2016Google Scholar

OECD, Competition Assessment Toolkit Volume I: Principles (Version 3, 2016)Google Scholar

OECD, Competition Assessment Toolkit Volume II: Guidance (Version 3, 2016)Google Scholar

Publications, WB, Corporate Governance of State-Owned Enterprises: A Toolkit (World Bank 2014)Google Scholar

IFC Performance Standards on Environmental and Social Sustainability (2012)Google Scholar

ILO Tripartite Declaration of Principles concerning Multinational Enterprises and Social Policy 2017Google Scholar

Sovereign Wealth Funds Generally Accepted Principles and Practices ‘Santiago Principles’ 2008Google Scholar

World Bank Group Environmental, Health, and Safety Guidelines (30 April 2007)Google Scholar

Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, ‘Statement on the Obligations of States Parties Regarding the Corporate Sector and Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (UN Doc. E/C.12/2011/1)’Google Scholar

‘Consideration of Reports Submitted by States Parties under Article 12, Paragraph 1, of the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the Sale of Children, Child Prostitution and Child Pornography’ (Committee on the Rights of the Child 2012) CRC/C/OPSC/SWE/CO/1Google Scholar

Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: Implementing the United Nations ‘Protect, Respect and Remedy’ Framework 2011Google Scholar

Basic Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Remedy and Reparation for Victims of Gross Violations of International Human Rights Law and Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law (A/RES/60/147)Google Scholar

General Assembly, Human Rights Council, Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and other Business Enterprises (A/HRC/RES/17/4)Google Scholar

General Assembly Resolution A/Res/74/180, 18 December 2019Google Scholar

General Recommendation No. 19 (UN Doc. A/47/38, 1992)Google Scholar

Guide to Enactment of the UNCITRAL Model Law on Public Procurement 2014Google Scholar

Human Rights Commission, Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises SRSG mandate 2005 (E/CN4/RES/2005/69)Google Scholar

Human Rights Council, Resolution 17/4 Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises 2011 (A/HRC/RES/17/4)Google Scholar

Towards Global Partnerships: A Principle-Based Approach to Enhanced Cooperation between the United Nations and All Relevant Partners (A/RES/73/254) 2019Google Scholar

UN Committee against Torture (CAT), General Comment No. 2: Implementation of Article 2 by States Parties, 24 January 2008, CAT/C/GC/2Google Scholar

UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (CESCR), General Comment No. 3: The Nature of States Parties’ Obligations (Art. 2, Para. 1, of the Covenant), 14 December 1990, E/1991/23Google Scholar

UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (CESCR), General Comment No. 14: The Right to the Highest Attainable Standard of Health (Art. 12 of the Covenant), 11 August 2000, E/C.12/2000/4 2000Google Scholar

UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (CESCR), General comment No. 24 (2017) on State obligations under the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in the context of business activities, 10 August 2017, E/C.12/GC/24Google Scholar

UN Committee on the Rights of the Child (CRC), General comment No. 16 (2013) on State obligations regarding the impact of the business sector on children’s rights, 17 April 2013, CRC/C/GC/16Google Scholar

UN Human Rights Committee (HRC), General comment no. 31, The nature of the general legal obligation imposed on States Parties to the Covenant, 26 May 2004, CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add.13Google Scholar

UN Human Rights Committee (HRC), General comment no. 36, Article 6 (Right to Life), 3 September 2019, CCPR/C/GC/35Google Scholar

UN Working Group on Business and Human Rights, ‘Guidance on National Action Plans on Business and Human Rights’ (United Nations 2016)Google Scholar

Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts (November 2001, Supplement No. 10 (U.N. Doc. A/56/83 (2001)Google Scholar

Draft Articles on Jurisdictional Immunities of States and Their Property, with Commentaries (1991) Yearbook of the International Law Commission, 1991, vol. II, part 2. (A/46/10)Google Scholar

Draft Articles on Prevention of Transboundary Harm from Hazardous Activities, with commentaries 2001Google Scholar

Legally Binding Instrument to Regulate, in International Human Rights Law, the Activities of Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises (Zero Draft July 16, 2018)Google Scholar

Maastricht Principles on Extraterritorial Obligations of States in the Area of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights 2013Google Scholar

Second Revised Draft, Legally Binding Instrument to Regulate, in International Human Rights Law, the Activities of Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises (August 6 2020)Google Scholar

UNCITRAL Model Law on Public Procurement (2011)Google Scholar

Castro, JMA, ‘Human Rights and the Critiques of the Public-Private Distinction’ (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Faculty of Law 2010)Google Scholar

Tejera, V, ‘The Interaction of the Jurisdictional Immunities of the State and the Sovereign Wealth Funds: The Case of the US FSIA Vis-à-Vis the 2004 UN Convention’ (Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies 2017)Google Scholar

‘About Us | International Forum of Sovereign Wealth Funds’ <https://www.ifswf.org/about-us> accessed 10 August 2020+accessed+10+August+2020>Google Scholar

‘Case Database – OECD Watch Case Database’ <https://complaints.oecdwatch.org/cases> accessed 11 August 2020+accessed+11+August+2020>Google Scholar

‘Chile’s Response to the Survey on the Implementation of the Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: The Role of States as Economic Actors’ <https://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Business/Pages/2015Survey.aspx>>Google Scholar

‘Clarifying Kiobel’s “Touch and Concern” Test’ <https://harvardlawreview.org/2017/05/clarifying-kiobels-touch-and-concern-test/> accessed 12 August 2020+accessed+12+August+2020>Google Scholar

‘Colombia’s Response to the Survey on the Implementation of the Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: The Role of States as Economic Actors’ <https://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Business/Pages/2015Survey.aspx>>Google Scholar

‘Countries’ (Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative) <https://eiti.org/countries> accessed 12 August 2020+accessed+12+August+2020>Google Scholar

‘Cuba’s Response to the Survey on the Implementation of the Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: The Role of States as Economic Actors’ <https://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Business/Pages/2015Survey.aspx>>Google Scholar

‘Cyprus’ Response to the Survey on the Implementation of the Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: The Role of States as Economic Actors’ <https://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Business/Pages/2015Survey.aspx>>Google Scholar

‘Denmark’s Response to the Survey on the Implementation of the Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: The Role of States as Economic Actors’ <https://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Business/Pages/2015Survey.aspx>>Google Scholar

‘Environmental and Social Policies’ (World Bank) <http://www.worldbank.org/en/projects-operations/environmental-and-social-policies> accessed 10 July 2020+accessed+10+July+2020>Google Scholar

Fan, G and Hope, NC, ‘Chapter 16: The Role of State-Owned Enterprises in the Chinese Economy’ [2013] China US Focus <www.chinausfocus.com> accessed 12 December 2020+accessed+12+December+2020>Google Scholar

‘Foreign Government Investors [GN23] | Foreign Investment Review Board’ <https://firb.gov.au/resources/guidance/gn23> accessed 26 July 2020+accessed+26+July+2020>Google Scholar

‘France’s Response to the Survey on the Implementation of the Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: The Role of States as Economic Actors’ <https://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Business/Pages/2015Survey.aspx>>Google Scholar

‘Georgia’s Response to the Survey on the Implementation of the Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: The Role of States as Economic Actors’ <https://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Business/Pages/2015Survey.aspx>>Google Scholar

‘Ghana’s Response to the Survey on the Implementation of the Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: The Role of States as Economic Actors’ <https://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Business/Pages/2015Survey.aspx>>Google Scholar

‘History of the EITI’ (Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative) <https://eiti.org/history> accessed 12 August 2020+accessed+12+August+2020>Google Scholar

‘Homepage | UN Global Compact’ <https://www.unglobalcompact.org/> accessed 12 August 2020+accessed+12+August+2020>Google Scholar

‘Human Rights and Business Dilemmas Forum – Dilemmas’ <https://hrbdf.org/dilemmas/working-soe/> accessed 27 July 2020+accessed+27+July+2020>Google Scholar

‘ILO Revises Its Landmark Declaration on Multinational Enterprises’ (17 March 2017) <http://www.ilo.org/global/about-the-ilo/newsroom/news/WCMS_547615/lang--en/index.htm> accessed 12 August 2020+accessed+12+August+2020>Google Scholar

IMFBlog, ‘State-Owned Enterprises in the Time of COVID-19’ (IMF Blog) <https://blogs.imf.org/2020/05/07/state-owned-enterprises-in-the-time-of-covid-19/> accessed 9 December 2020+accessed+9+December+2020>Google Scholar

‘Italy’s Response to the Survey on the Implementation of the Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: The Role of States as Economic Actors’ <https://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Business/Pages/2015Survey.aspx>>Google Scholar

Kenya’s Response to the Survey on the Implementation of the Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: The Role of States as Economic Actors’ <https://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Business/Pages/2015Survey.aspx>>Google Scholar

Ministry of Enterprise and Innovation: Sweden, ‘Response to Working Group Survey on Implementation of the Guiding Principles – Business Enterprises Owned or Controlled by the State’ (2016) <https://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Business/Pages/2015Survey.aspx>>Google Scholar

‘MOFCOM and MEP Jointly Issued Guidance on Environmental Protection in Foreign Investment and Cooperation’ <http://english.mofcom.gov.cn/article/newsrelease/significantnews/201303/20130300043146.shtml> accessed 18 August 2020+accessed+18+August+2020>Google Scholar

‘National Action Plans on Business and Human Rights’ (National Action Plans on Business and Human Rights) <https://globalnaps.org/> accessed 10 August 2020+accessed+10+August+2020>Google Scholar

‘National Contact Points – Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development’ <http://mneguidelines.oecd.org/ncps/> accessed 11 August 2020+accessed+11+August+2020>Google Scholar

‘National Human Rights Action Plan of China (2016–2020)’ <http://english.gov.cn/archive/publications/2016/09/29/content_281475454482622.htm> accessed 18 August 2020+accessed+18+August+2020>Google Scholar

‘Netherland’s Response to the Survey on the Implementation of the Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: The Role of States as Economic Actors’ <https://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Business/Pages/2015Survey.aspx>>Google Scholar

‘Norway’s Response to the Survey on the Implementation of the Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: The Role of States as Economic Actors’ <https://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Business/Pages/2015Survey.aspx>>Google Scholar

Norges Bank Investment Management, ‘Human Rights Expectations towards Companies’ <https://www.nbim.no/contentassets/3258fe10181544cc8e02566c7237fa5f/human-rights-expectations-document2.pdf> 29 December 2020+29+December+2020>Google Scholar

Norwegian Government, ‘Response to Working Group Survey on Implementation of the Guiding Principles – Business Enterprises Owned or Controlled by the State’ (2016) <https://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Business/Pages/2015Survey.aspx>>Google Scholar

Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, ‘Business and Human Rights National Action Plan for the Implementation of the UN Guiding Principles’ <https://www.regjeringen.no/en/dokumenter/business_hr/id2457944/>>Google Scholar

‘Notice of the CBRC on Issuing the Green Credit Guidelines’ <http://www.cbrc.gov.cn/EngdocView.do?docID=3CE646AB629B46B9B533B1D8D9FF8C4A> accessed 18 August 2020+accessed+18+August+2020>Google Scholar

‘Observation and Exclusion of Companies’ (Norges Bank Investment Management) <https://www.nbim.no/en/the-fund/responsible-investment/exclusion-of-companies/> accessed 13 December 2020+accessed+13+December+2020>Google Scholar

Office of the United Nations Commissioner for Human Rights, ‘Status of Ratification of the 18 International Human Rights Treaties’ <http://indicators.ohchr.org/> accessed 10 December 2020+accessed+10+December+2020>Google Scholar

‘Policy Documents | Foreign Investment Review Board’ <https://firb.gov.au/guidance-resources/policy-documents> accessed 26 July 2020+accessed+26+July+2020>Google Scholar

‘Publish What You Pay: History’ <http://www.publishwhatyoupay.org/about/history/> accessed 12 August 2020+accessed+12+August+2020>Google Scholar

‘Russia’s Response to the Survey on the Implementation of the Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: The Role of States as Economic Actors’ <https://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Business/Pages/2015Survey.aspx>>Google Scholar

‘SASAC’ <http://en.sasac.gov.cn/index.html> accessed 18 August 2020+accessed+18+August+2020>Google Scholar

‘SASAC About SASAC – SASAC Main Functions – SASAC’ <http://en.sasac.gov.cn/n1408028/n1408521/index.html> accessed 4 February 2019+accessed+4+February+2019>Google Scholar

‘Secretary-General Proposes Global Compact on Human Rights, Labour, Environment, in Address to World Economic Forum in Davos | Meetings Coverage and Press Releases’ <https://www.un.org/press/en/1999/19990201.sgsm6881.html> accessed 12 August 2020+accessed+12+August+2020>Google Scholar

‘States’ Obligations to Respect and Protect Human Rights Abroad Joint Statement on John Ruggie’s Draft Guiding Principles (Statement by a Group of International Organisations and Eminent Scholars)’ <https://www.fidh.org/en/>>Google Scholar

‘Status: UNCITRAL Model Law on Public Procurement (2011) | United Nations Commission On International Trade Law’ <https://uncitral.un.org/en/texts/procurement/modellaw/public_procurement/status> accessed 16 August 2020+accessed+16+August+2020>Google Scholar

‘Sustainability – GIEK’ <https://www.giek.no/sustainability/> accessed 31 August 2020+accessed+31+August+2020>Google Scholar

‘Sweden’s Response to the Survey on the Implementation of the Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: The Role of States as Economic Actors’ <https://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Business/Pages/2015Survey.aspx>>Google Scholar

‘Switzerland’s Response to the Survey on the Implementation of the Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: The Role of States as Economic Actors’ <https://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Business/Pages/2015Survey.aspx>>Google Scholar

‘The COVID-19 Crisis and State Ownership in the Economy: Issues and Policy Considerations’ (OECD) <https://www.oecd.org/coronavirus/policy-responses/the-covid-19-crisis-and-state-ownership-in-the-economy-issues-and-policy-considerations-ce417c46/> accessed 10 December 2020+accessed+10+December+2020>Google Scholar

‘The EITI Principles’ (Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative, 27 January 2017) <https://eiti.org/document/eiti-principles> accessed 12 August 2020+accessed+12+August+2020>Google Scholar

‘The Kyrgyz Republic’s Response to the Survey on the Implementation of the Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: The Role of States as Economic Actors’ <https://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Business/Pages/2015Survey.aspx>>Google Scholar

‘The Ten Principles | UN Global Compact’ <https://www.unglobalcompact.org/what-is-gc/mission/principles> accessed 12 August 2020+accessed+12+August+2020>Google Scholar

‘Top 91 Largest Sovereign Wealth Fund Rankings by Total Assets – SWFI’ <https://www.swfinstitute.org/fund-rankings/sovereign-wealth-fund> accessed 26 July 2020+accessed+26+July+2020>Google Scholar

‘UK’s Response to the Survey on the Implementation of the Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: The Role of States as Economic Actors’ <https://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Business/Pages/2015Survey.aspx>>Google Scholar

‘UN Global Compact Policy on Communicating Progress’ <https://www.unglobalcompact.org/participation/report/cop>>Google Scholar

‘USA’s Response to the Survey on the Implementation of the Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: The Role of States as Economic Actors’ <https://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Business/Pages/2015Survey.aspx>>Google Scholar

‘What We Do’ <http://en.sasac.gov.cn/2018/07/17/c_7.htm> accessed 18 August 2020+accessed+18+August+2020>Google Scholar

‘What’s the Commitment? | UN Global Compact’ <https://www.unglobalcompact.org/participation/join/commitment> accessed 26 August 2020+accessed+26+August+2020>Google Scholar

‘Who We Are’ (Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative) <https://eiti.org/who-we-are> accessed 12 August 2020+accessed+12+August+2020>Google Scholar