Book contents
- Statelessness in Asia
- Statelessness in Asia
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Editor Bios
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Notes on the Cover Image
- Abbreviations
- 1 Statelessness in Asia
- Part I Asia and the Phenomenon of Statelessness
- Part II Statelessness and Intersecting Vulnerabilities
- Part III Challenges and Prospects for Change
- 10 Stranded in Limbo
- 11 Statelessness in Myanmar
- 12 Addressing Statelessness through the Human Rights and Development Frameworks
- 13 Persuading to Ratify
- Table of Legislation
- Table of Treaties
- Index
10 - Stranded in Limbo
(De Facto) Denationalization and Statelessness of Indonesian Foreign Terrorist Fighters
from Part III - Challenges and Prospects for Change
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 December 2024
- Statelessness in Asia
- Statelessness in Asia
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Editor Bios
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Notes on the Cover Image
- Abbreviations
- 1 Statelessness in Asia
- Part I Asia and the Phenomenon of Statelessness
- Part II Statelessness and Intersecting Vulnerabilities
- Part III Challenges and Prospects for Change
- 10 Stranded in Limbo
- 11 Statelessness in Myanmar
- 12 Addressing Statelessness through the Human Rights and Development Frameworks
- 13 Persuading to Ratify
- Table of Legislation
- Table of Treaties
- Index
Summary
This chapter explores denationalization, focusing on Indonesian foreign terrorist fighters (FTFs). Post-9/11 and during the Arab Spring, Western democracies tightened border control to combat terrorism, enabling the stripping of citizenship from involved individuals. Denationalization, via law or public-authority decisions, emerged as a contentious counter-terrorism tool. Indonesia, as a Muslim-majority Southeast Asian nation, partially embraced denationalization, refusing to repatriate Indonesian FTFs. This aligns with global security concerns but raises statelessness questions. The chapter examines denationalization’s legal framework, international obligations, and the blurred line between de jure and de facto statelessness. Critics argue that disproportionately applying denationalization to Muslims undermines human rights, inter-state cooperation and international justice. Refusal to repatriate Indonesian FTFs raises concerns about long-term consequences and due process. Understanding denationalization nuances is vital, considering its impact on the citizenship rights of individuals involved in terrorism.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Statelessness in Asia , pp. 261 - 280Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2025