Summary
DESPITE his dismissal of Monro's concerns about the legal limits of police action, the Commissioner was himself in a legal conundrum in late 1888. As he explained to Ruggles-Brise on 4 October:
I am quite prepared to take the responsibility of adopting the most drastic or arbitrary measures that the S[ecretary] of S[tate] can name wh[ich] w[oul]d further the securing of the murderer however illegal they may be, provided Hm. Govt will support me… All I want to ensure is that the Govt will indemnify us for our action wh[ich] must necessarily be adopted to the circ[umstance]s of the case.
Three weeks ago I do not think the public would have acquiesced in any illegal action but now I think they would welcome anything which shows activity [and] enterprise. Of course the danger… is that if we did not find the murderer our action would be condemned & there is the danger that an illegal act… might bond the Social Democrats together to resist the Police & it might be then be said to have caused a serious riot… [Houses] could not be searched illegally without violent resistance & bloodshed & the certainty of one or more Police officers being killed… We have in times past done something on a very small scale but then we had certain information that a person was concealed in a house. In this matter I have not only myself to think of but the lives & position of 12,000 men, any one of whom might be hanged if a death occurred in entering a house illegally.
What specific past case(s) Warren was referring to we do not know, but all the same this letter tells us several important things: firstly, that illegal house searches had been undertaken by Metropolitan Police officers in the past; secondly, that Warren still feared ‘the mob’ and its socialist instigators; thirdly, that Warren's relationship with the Home Secretary had not necessarily improved following Monro's departure; and fourthly, that ‘the murderer’ – known to the public only by a macabre letter received by the Central News Agency on 27 September signed ‘Jack the Ripper’ – was increasingly making a mockery of the police's ability to combat violent crime in London.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- State Surveillance, Political Policing and Counter-Terrorism in Britain1880–1914, pp. 112 - 124Publisher: Boydell & BrewerPrint publication year: 2021