Standardising English Spelling The Role of Printing in Sixteenth and Seventeenth-century Graphemic Developments
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 31 March 2022
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Standardising English SpellingThe Role of Printing in Sixteenth and Seventeenth-century Graphemic Developments, pp. 224 - 250Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022
References
Primary Sources
Anthony, L. (developer). 2020. AntConc. Tokyo: Waseba University. www.laurenceanthony.net/software/antconc [accessed 20 Oct. 2021].Google Scholar
Denison, D. & Yáñez-Bouza, N. (compilers). 2012. ARCHER: A Representative Corpus of Historical English Registers. Manchester: University of Manchester.Google Scholar
Early English Books Online Text Creation Partnership (EEBO TCP). 2015–ongoing. https://quod.lib.umich.edu/e/eebogroup [accessed 13 Oct. 2021].Google Scholar
Kytö, M. & Culpeper, J., in collaboration with Walker, T. & Archer, D. (compilers). 2006. A Corpus of English Dialogues: 1560–1760. Uppsala: Uppsala University.Google Scholar
Kytö, M., Grund, P. J. & Walker, T. (compilers). 2011. An Electronic Text Edition of Depositions 1560–1760, available on CD-ROM. In Kytö, M., Grund, P. J. & Walker, T., Testifying to Language and Life in Early Modern England. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McEnery, T. & Hardie, A. (compilers). 2007. The Lancaster Newsbooks Corpus. Lancaster: University of Lancaster.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, T., Raumolin-Brunberg, H., Nurmi, A., et al. (compilers). 1998. Corpus of Early English Correspondence. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
Oxford English Dictionary. 2020. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://oed.com [accessed 19 Oct. 2021].Google Scholar
Rissanen, M., Kytö, M., Kahlas-Tarkka, L., et al. 1991. Helsinki Corpus of English Texts. Helsinki: Department of Modern Languages, University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
Schmied, J., Claridge, C. & Siemund, R. (compilers). 1994. The Lampeter Corpus of Early Modern English Tracts. Chemnitz: Chemnitz University of Technology.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, W. 1623. Plays. Oxford Text Archive. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12024/0119 [accessed 19 Oct. 2021].Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, I., Pahta, P., Hiltunen, T., et al. (compilers). 2010. Early Modern English Medical Texts. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Secondary Sources
Anon. 1538. The B A C bothe in Latyn and in Englysshe. Londo[n]: In Paules Chyrche yarde at the sygne of the maydens heed by thomas Petyt.Google Scholar
Brooksbank, J. 1651. An English Monosyllabary […]. London: Printed for Edward Brewster.Google Scholar
Bullokar, W. 1580a. A Short Introduction or Guiding to Print, Write, and Reade Inglish Speech […]. London: Henry Denham.Google Scholar
Bullokar, W. 1968 [1580]. The Amendment of Orthographie for English Speech. Amsterdam: Theatrum Orbis Terrarum.Google Scholar
Catholic Church. 1538. Here after Foloweth the Prymer in Englysshe Sette out Alonge, after the Vse of Sarum. Rowen: By Nycholas le Roux, for F. Regnault.Google Scholar
Catholic Church. 1540? The Primer in Englishe wyth the A.B.C. for Children after the Vse of Salisburye. Newlye Imprinted. London: R. Grafton and E. Whitchurch?Google Scholar
Chaucer, G. 1532. The Workes of Geoffray Chaucer Newly Printed. London: Thomas Godfray.Google Scholar
Clement, F. 1587. The Petie Schole with an English Orthographie […]. London: Thomas Vautrollier.Google Scholar
Clowes, W. 1596. A Profitable and Necessarie Booke […]. London: Edm. Bollifant for Thomas Dawson.Google Scholar
Cockeram, H. 1626. The English Dictionarie […]. London: Isaac Jaggard for Edmund Weaver.Google Scholar
Coote, E. 1596. Englishe Scholemaister […]. London: Widow Orwin for Icksten and Robert Dexter.Google Scholar
Digges, L. 1555. Prognostication of Right Good Effect […]. London: Within the blacke Fryars, by Thomas Gemini.Google Scholar
Hart, J. 1569. An Orthographie: Conteyning the Due Order and Reason, Howe to Write or Paint Thimage of Mannes Voice, Most like to the Life or Nature. London: By [Henry Denham? for] William Seres, dwelling at the west ende of Paules, at the signe of the Hedge-hogge. Reprinted in B. Danielsson, 1955, John Hart’s Works on English Orthography and Pronunciation, 1551, 1569, 1576, vol. 2. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell, pp. 165–228.Google Scholar
Hart, J. 1570. A Methode or Comfortable Beginning for all Vnlearned […]. London: Henrie Denham.Google Scholar
Hart, J. 1955 [1551]. The Opening of the Unreasonable Writing of Our Inglish Toung. In Danielsson, B., John Hart’s Works on English Orthography and Pronunciation, 1551, 1569, 1576, vol. 1. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell, pp. 109–64.Google Scholar
Hayward, T. c. 1625. The Institutions of Children in the English Tongue. British Library, MS Sloane 2609.Google Scholar
Hodges, R. 1649. The Plainest Directions for the True-Writing of English […]. London: William Dugard for Thomas Euster.Google Scholar
Hume, A. 1617. Of the Orthographie and Congruitie of the Britan Tongue […]. London: Truebner & Co.Google Scholar
Johnson, S. 1755. A Dictionary of the English Language […]. London: Printed for Longman, Hurst, Rees, Orme, and Brown.Google Scholar
Moxon, J. 1683. Mechanick Exercises: Or The Doctrine Of Handy-Works […], vol. 1. London: J. Moxon at the sign of the Atlas on Ludgate Hill.Google Scholar
Mulcaster, R. 1582. The First Part of the Elementarie […]. London: Tomas Vautroullier.Google Scholar
Savonarola, G. 1509a. Sermo Fratris Hieronymi de Ferraria […]. London: Richard Pynson.Google Scholar
Smith, Sir T. 1963 [1568]. De recta et emendata linguæ anglicanæ scriptione dialogus (Stockholm Studies in English, 56). Danielsson, B. (ed. and tr.), Sir Thomas Smith’s Literary and Linguistic Works, vol. 3. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Trissino, G. G. 1529. A b c […]. [A single sheet containing the alphabet, a series of simple syllables, the Lord’s Prayer and a hymn to the Virgin]. See also T. I. Da Bressa: Vicenza, 1529: […]. The additional characters invented by G. G. Trissino are employed. British Library catalogue entry, pressmark C. 107. K.8.Google Scholar
Adamson, J. W. 1946 [1929]. ‘The extent of literacy in England in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries: Notes and conjectures’. In The Illiterate Anglo-Saxon and Other Essays on Education, Medieval and Modern. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 38–61. Reprinted from ‘The extent of literacy in England in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries: Notes and conjectures’, Library, 4th ser., 10, pp. 163–93.Google Scholar
Agata, M. 2011. ‘Improvements, corrections, and changes in the Gutenberg Bible’. In Thaisen, J. & Rutkowska, H. (eds.), Scribes, Printers, and the Accidentals of Their Texts. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, pp. 135–55.Google Scholar
Agha, A. 2003. ‘The social life of cultural value’, Language and Communication, 23, pp. 231–73.Google Scholar
Andersen, J. L. & Sauer, E.. 2002. ‘Current trends in the history of reading’. In Andersen, J. L. & Sauer, E. (eds.), Books and Readers in Early Modern England: Material Studies. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, pp. 1–20.Google Scholar
Archer, D., Kytö, M., Baron, A. & Rayson, P.. 2015. ‘Guidelines for normalising early modern English corpora: Decisions and justifications’, ICAME Journal, 39, pp. 7–42.Google Scholar
Aronoff, M. 1989. ‘The orthographic system of an early English printer: Wynkyn de Worde’, Folia Linguistica Historica, 8 (1–2), pp. 65–97.Google Scholar
Atwell, E. & Elliot, S.. 1987. ‘Dealing with ill-formed English text’. In Garside, R., Leech, G. & Sampson, G. (eds.), The Computational Analysis of English: A Corpus-Based Approach. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Auer, A. 2006. ‘Precept and practice: The influence of prescriptivism on the English subjunctive’. In Dalton-Puffer, C., Kastovsky, D., Ritt, N. & Schendl, H. (eds.), Syntax, Style and Grammatical Norms: English from 1500–2000. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, pp. 33–53.Google Scholar
Auer, A. & Fairman, T.. 2013. ‘Letters of artisans and the labouring poor (England, c. 1750–1835)’. In Bennett, P., Durrell, M., Scheible, S. & Whitt, R. J. (eds.), New Methods in Historical Corpus Linguistics (Corpus Linguistics and Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Language, 3). Narr: Tübingen, pp. 77–91.Google Scholar
Auer, P. 2005. ‘Europe’s sociolinguistic unity, or: A typology of European dialect/ standard constellations’. In Delbecque, N., van der Auwera, J. & Geeraerts, D. (eds.), Perspectives on Variation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 7–42.Google Scholar
Ayres-Bennett, W. 1994. ‘Elaboration and codification: Standardization and attitudes towards the French language in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries’. In Parry, M. M., Davis, W. V. & Temple, R. A. M. (eds.), The Changing Voices of Europe: Social and Political Changes and Their Linguistic Repercussions. Cardiff: University of Wales Press, pp. 53‒73.Google Scholar
Baddeley, S. 2012. ‘French orthography in the 16th century’. In Baddeley, S. & Voeste, A. (eds.), Orthographies in Early Modern Europe. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, pp. 97‒126.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M. 1981. The Dialogic Imagination, ed. Holquist, M., trans. C. Emerson & M. Holquist. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bambas, R. C. 1947. ‘Verb forms in -s and -eth in early modern English prose’, Journal of English and Germanic Philology, 46, pp. 183–7.Google Scholar
Barber, C. 1997. Early Modern English, 2nd rev. ed. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Barber, C., Beal, J. C. & Shaw, P. A.. 2009. The English Language: A Historical Introduction, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barker, N. 1994. ‘The Aldine italic’. In Myers, R. & Harris, M. (eds.), A Millennium of the Book: Production, Design and Illustration in Manuscript and Print, 900‒1900. Winchester: St Paul’s Bibliographies, pp. 45‒60.Google Scholar
Barnard, J. 2002. ‘Introduction’. In Bernard, J. & McKenzie, D. F. (eds.), The Cambridge History of the Book in Britain, vol. 4: 1557–1695. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–25.Google Scholar
Barnard, J. & Bell, M.. 2002a. ‘The English provinces’. In Barnard, J. & McKenzie, D. F. (eds.), The Cambridge History of the Book in Britain, vol. 4: 1557–1695. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 636–44.Google Scholar
Barnard, J. & Bell, M., 2002b. ‘Appendix 1: Statistical tables’. In Barnard, J. & McKenzie, D. F. (eds.), The Cambridge History of the Book in Britain, vol. 4: 1557–1695. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 779–93.Google Scholar
Baron, A. & Rayson, P.. 2008. ‘VARD2: A tool for dealing with spelling variation in historical corpora’, Proceedings of the Postgraduate Conference in Corpus Linguistics, Birmingham, Aston University, Birmingham, 22 May 2008. http://ucrel.lancs.ac.uk/people/paul/publications/BaronRaysonAston2008.pdf [accessed 20 Oct. 2021].Google Scholar
Baron, A. & Rayson, P.. 2009. ‘Automatic standardization of texts containing spelling variation: How much training data do you need?’ In Mahlberg, M., González-Díaz, V. & Smith, C. (eds.), Proceedings of the Corpus Linguistics Conference, CL2009, 20–23 July 2009. Liverpool: University of Liverpool. http://ucrel.lancs.ac.uk/publications/cl2009/314_FullPaper.pdf [accessed 2 Nov. 2018].Google Scholar
Baron, A., Rayson, P. & Archer, D.. 2009a. ‘The Extent of Spelling Variation in Early Modern English’. Presented at ICAME (International Computer Archive for Modern and Medieval English) 30, Lancaster University, UK, 27–31 May 2009.Google Scholar
Baron, A., Rayson, P. & Archer, D.. 2009b. ‘Word frequency and key word statistics in historical corpus linguistics’, Anglistik: International Journal of English Studies, 20 (1), pp. 41–67.Google Scholar
Baron, A., Rayson, P. & Archer, D.. 2011a. ‘Innovators of Early Modern English Spelling Change: Using DICER to Investigate Spelling Variation Trends’. Presented at the Helsinki Corpus Festival, Helsinki, Finland, 28 September–2 October 2011.Google Scholar
Baron, A., Rayson, P. & Archer, D.. 2011b. ‘Quantifying Early Modern English Spelling Variation: Change over Time and Genre’. Presented at the Conference on New Methods in Historical Corpora, University of Manchester, UK. 29–30 April 2011.Google Scholar
Bartsch, R. 1985. ‘The influence of language standardisation on linguistic norms’, Studia Linguistica, 39, pp. 23–50.Google Scholar
Basu, A. 2016. “‘Ill shapen sounds, and false orthography”: A computational approach to Early English orthographic variation’. In Estill, L., Ullyot, M. & Jackaki, D. (eds.), New Technologies in Medieval and Renaissance Studies. Tempe, AZ: Arizona Center for Medieval and Renaissance Studies and Iter, pp. 167–200.Google Scholar
Basu, A. & Pentecost, S.. 2014. EEBO N-Gram Browser. St Louis: Humanities Digital Workshop, Washington University. https://earlyprint.org/lab/tool_ngram_browser.html [accessed 20 Oct. 2021].Google Scholar
Baugh, A. C. & Cable, T.. 2013. A History of the English Language, 6th ed. London: Pearson.Google Scholar
Beal, J. C. 2016. ‘Standardisation’. In Kytö, M. & Pahta, P. (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of English Historical Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 301–17.Google Scholar
Bell, A. 2007. ‘Style and the linguistic repertoire’. In Llamas, C., Mullany, L. & Stockwell, P. (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Sociolinguistics. London: Routledge, pp. 95–100.Google Scholar
Bell, M. & Barnard, J.. 1992. ‘Provisional count of STC titles 1475–1640’, Publishing History, 31, pp. 49–55.Google Scholar
Bellingradt, D. & Salman, J.. 2017. ‘Books and book history in motion: Materiality, sociality and spatiality’. In Bellingradt, D., Nelles, P. & Salman, J. (eds.), Books in Motion in Early Modern Europe: Beyond Production, Circulation and Consumption. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1–11.Google Scholar
Bennett, H. S. 1989. English Books and Readers, vol. I: 1475–1557, vol. II: 1558–1603, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Benskin, M. 2004. ‘Chancery standard’. In Kay, C., Hough, C. & Wotherspoon, I. (eds.), New Perspectives on English Historical Linguistics, vol. 2. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 1–40.Google Scholar
Berg, K. & Aronoff, M.. 2017. ‘Self-organization in the spelling of English suffixes: The emergence of culture out of anarchy’, Language, 93 (1), pp. 37–64.Google Scholar
Bevan, J. 2002. ‘Scotland’. In Bernard, J. & McKenzie, D. F. (eds.), The Cambridge History of the Book in Britain, vol. 4: 1557–1695. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 687–700.Google Scholar
Bidwell, J. 2002. ‘French paper in English books’. In Bernard, J. & McKenzie, D. F. (eds.), The Cambridge History of the Book in Britain, vol. 4: 1557–1695. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 583–601.Google Scholar
Binns, J. W. 1990. Intellectual Culture in Elizabethan and Jacobean England: The Latin Writings of the Age. Leeds: Cairns.Google Scholar
Blake, N. F. 1965. ‘English versions of “Reynard the Fox” in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries’, Studies in Philology, 62, pp. 63–77.Google Scholar
Blake, N. F. 1985. William Caxton: A Bibliographical Guidance. New York: Garland Publishing, Inc.Google Scholar
Blake, N. F. 1989. ‘Manuscript to print’. In Griffiths, J. & Pearsall, D. (eds.), Book Production and Publishing in Britain 1375–1475. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 403–33.Google Scholar
Blake, N. F. 1992. ‘Early modern English’. In Nocera Avila, C., Pantaleo, N. & Pezzini, D. (eds.), Early Modern English: Trends, Forms and Texts. Fasano: Schena editore, pp. 13–37.Google Scholar
Blake, N. F. 2000. ‘The English language of the early modern period’. In Hattaway, M. (ed.), A Companion to English Renaissance Literature and Culture (Blackwell Companions to Literature and Culture). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 71–80.Google Scholar
Bland, M. 1996. ‘“Invisible dangers”: Censorship and the subversion of authority in early modern England’, The Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America, 90 (2), pp. 151‒93.Google Scholar
Bland, M. 1998. ‘The appearance of the text in early modern England’, Text, 11, pp. 91–154.Google Scholar
Bland, M. 1999. ‘The London book-trade in 1600’. In Kastan, D. S. (ed.), A Companion to Shakespeare. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 450–63.Google Scholar
Bland, M. 2005. ‘Further information: Drummond’s Democritie, a labyrinth of delight and his “Certain Informations and Manners of Ben Jonson”’, Text, 17, pp. 145–86.Google Scholar
Bland, M. 2010. A Guide to Early Printed Books and Manuscripts. London: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Blatt, H. 2018. Participatory Reading in Late-Medieval England. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Blayney, P. W. M. 1973. ‘The prevalence of shared printing in the early seventeenth century’, Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America, 67, pp. 437–42.Google Scholar
Blayney, P. W. M. 2003a. ‘The site of the sign of the sun’. In Myers, R., Harris, M. & Mandelbrote, G. (eds.), The London Book Trade: Topographies of Print in the Metropolis from the 16th Century. Newcastle: Oak Knoll, pp. 1–21.Google Scholar
Blayney, P. W. M. 2003b. The Stationers’ Company before the Charter, 1403–1557. London: The Worshipful Company of Stationers and Newspapermakers.Google Scholar
de Boer, B. 2011. ‘Self-organization and language evolution’. In Gibson, K. R. & Tallerman, M. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Language Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 612–20.Google Scholar
Bollmann, M. 2012. ‘(Semi-)automatic normalization of historical texts using distance measures and the Norma tool’. In Mambrini, F., Passarotti, M. & Sporleder, C. (eds.), Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Annotation of Corpora for Research in the Humanities. Lisbon: Colibri, pp. 3–14.Google Scholar
Bourcier, G. 1978. L’orthographie de l’anglais. Histories et situation actuelle. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Brackmann, R. 2012. ‘Inkhorns, orthographers, and antiquaries: Standardised English and the dawn of Anglo-Saxon studies’. In The Elizabethan Invention of Anglo-Saxon England. Martlesham: Boydell & Brewer, D. S. Brewer, pp. 55–83.Google Scholar
Breeze, A. & Glomski, J.. 1991. ‘An early British treatise upon education: Leonard Cox’s De erudienda iuventute (1526)’, Humanistica Louvaniensia, 40, pp. 112–67.Google Scholar
Brengelman, F. H. 1980. ‘Orthoepists, printers, and the rationalization of English spelling’, Journal of English and Germanic Philology, 79, pp. 332–54.Google Scholar
Bühler, C. T. 1960. William Caxton and His Critics. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
Burkhard, C. 2002. Zur Ungleichzeitigkeit in der Weltgesellschaft. Erkenntnistheoretische Kommentare zur Kriegsursachenforschung, Arbeitspapier 1/2002. Hamburg: Universität Hamburg, IPW, Forschungsstelle Kriege, Rüstung und Entwicklung.https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/71735506.pdf [accessed 20 Oct. 2021].Google Scholar
Burlinson, C. 2016. ‘Manuscript and print: 1500–1700’. Oxford Handbooks Online: Literature. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199935338.013.86.Google Scholar
Cantos, P. 2012. ‘The use of linguistic corpora for the study of linguistic variation and change: Types and computational applications’. In Hernández-Campoy, J. M. & Conde Silvestre, J. C. (eds.), The Handbook of Historical Sociolinguistics. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell, pp. 99–122.Google Scholar
Caon, L. 2010. ‘Final -E and spelling habits in the fifteenth-century versions of the Wife of Bath’s Prologue’, English Studies, 83 (4), pp. 296–310.Google Scholar
Capp, B. 1979. English Almanacs 1500–1800: Astrology and the Popular Press. London: Faber & Faber.Google Scholar
Cercignani, F. 1981. Shakespeare’s Works and Elizabethan Pronunciation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Cheshire, J. & Milroy, J.. 1993. ‘Syntactic variation in non-standard dialects: Background issues’. In Milroy, J. & Milroy, L. (eds.), Real English: The Grammar of English Dialects in the British Isles. London: Longman, pp. 3–33.Google Scholar
Classen, E. 1919. Outlines of the History of the English Language. London: Macmillan & Co.Google Scholar
Colin, C. 1972. ‘Refugee printers and publishers in Britain during the Tudor period’, Proceedings of the Huguenot Society of London, 22, pp. 115–26.Google Scholar
Collison, P., Hunt, A. & Walsham, A.. 2002. ‘Religious publishing in England: 1557–1640’. In Barnard, J. & McKenzie, D. F. (eds.), The Cambridge History of the Book in Britain, vol. 4: 1557–1695. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 29–66.Google Scholar
Comrie, B. 1981. Language Universals and Linguistic Typology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Conde-Silvestre, J. C. & Hernández-Campoy, J. M.. 2004. ‘A sociolinguistic approach to the diffusion of Chancery written practices in late fifteenth century private correspondence’, Neuphilologische Mitteilungen, 105, pp. 133–52.Google Scholar
Condorelli, M. 2020a. ‘From the early modern era to an international research area’. In Condorelli, M. (ed.), Advances in Historical Orthography, c. 1500–1800. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108674171.001.Google Scholar
Condorelli, M. 2020b. ‘Towards a relativity of spelling change’. In Condorelli, M. (ed.), Advances in Historical Orthography, c. 1500–1800. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 219–237. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108674171.011.Google Scholar
Condorelli, M. 2021a. ‘Positional spelling redistribution: Word-initial <u>/<v> and <i>/<j> in early modern English (1500–1700)’, English Language and Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674320000349./+and+/+in+early+modern+English+(1500–1700)’,+English+Language+and+Linguistics.+https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674320000349.>Google Scholar
Condorelli, M. 2021b. ‘The standardisation of i and y in early modern English (1500–1700)’, English Studies, 102 (1), pp. 101–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/0013838X.2020.1785169.Google Scholar
Condorelli, M. forthcoming a. ‘What is spelling standardisation?’ In M. Condorelli & H. Rutkowska (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Historical Orthography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Condorelli, M. forthcoming b. ‘The standardisation of vowel diacritic spelling in early modern English (1500–1700)’, Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics.Google Scholar
Condorelli, M. & Rutkowska, H.. forthcoming. ‘Historical orthography: purposes, ambitions and boundaries’. In Condorelli, M. & Rutkowska, H. (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Historical Orthography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Condorelli, M. & Voeste, A.. 2020. ‘Synergic dialogue in historical orthography: National philologies, comparability and questions for the future’. In Condorelli, M. (ed.), Advances in Historical Orthography, c. 1500–1800. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 238–49. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108674171.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Condorelli, M. & De Wulf, C.. forthcoming. ‘Networks of practice across English and Dutch corpora’. In Condorelli, M. & Rutkowska, H. (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Historical Orthography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Corrie, M. 2006. ‘Middle English – dialects and diversity’. In Mugglestone, L. (ed.), The Oxford History of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 86–119.Google Scholar
Craig, H. & Whipp, R.. 2010. ‘Old spellings, new methods: Automated procedures for indeterminate linguistic data’, Literary and Linguistic Computing, 25 (1), pp. 37–52.Google Scholar
Cram, D. 1989. ‘Seventeenth-century punctuation theory: Butler’s philosophical analysis and Wilkins’ philosophical critique’, Folia Linguistica Historica, 8, pp. 309–49.Google Scholar
Cressy, D. 1977. ‘Levels of illiteracy in England, 1530–1730’, Historical Journal, 20, pp. 1–23.Google Scholar
Cressy, D. 1980. Literacy and the Social Order: Reading and Writing in Tudor and Stuart England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Crystal, D. 2012. Spell It Out: The Story of English Spelling. London: St Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Culpeper, J. & Archer, D.. 2009. ‘The history of English spelling’. In Culpeper, J., Katamba, F., Kerswill, P., Wodak, R. & McEnery, T. (eds.), English Language: Description, Variation and Context. London: Palgrave MacMillan, pp. 244–58.Google Scholar
Curzan, A. 2008. ‘Historical corpus linguistics and evidence of language change’. In Lüdeling, A. & Kytö, M. (eds.), Corpus Linguistics: An International Handbook. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 1091–109.Google Scholar
Curzan, A. 2012. ‘Interdisciplinarity and historiography: Periodization in the history of the English language’. In Bergs, A. & Brinton, L. J. (eds.), English Historical Linguistics: An International Handbook, vol. 2. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, pp. 1233–56.Google Scholar
Dane, J. A. 2011. Out of Sorts: On Typography and Print Culture. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Deumert, A. & Vandenbussche, W.. 2003. ‘Standard languages: Taxonomies and histories’. In Deumert, A. & Vandenbussche, W. (eds.), Germanic Standardizations: Past to Present. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
Devitt, A. J. 1989. Standardising Written English: Diffusion in the Case of Scotland 1520–1659. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Diller, H.-J. 2001. ‘Genre in linguistic and related discourses’. In Diller, H.-J. & Görlach, M. (eds.), Towards a History of English as a History of Genres. Heidelberg: C. Winter, pp. 3–43.Google Scholar
Dobson, E. J. 1955. ‘Early modern standard English’, Transactions of the Philological Society, 54 (1), pp. 25–54.Google Scholar
Dobson, E. J. 1957. English Pronunciation 1500–1700, vols. I–II. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Dons, U. 2004. Descriptive Adequacy of Early Modern English Grammars. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Duff, E. G. 1948 [1906]. The Printers, Stationers and Bookbinders of Westminster and London from 1476 to 1535. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Durkin, P. 2014. Borrowed Words: A History of Loanwords in English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ehala, M. 1996. ‘Self-organization and language change’, Diachronica, 13 (1), pp. 1–28.Google Scholar
Eisenstein, E. L. 2005. The Printing Revolution in Early Modern Europe, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press [originally published as The Printing Press as an Agent of Change, 1979].Google Scholar
Evans, M. 2012. ‘A sociolinguistics of early modern spelling? An account of Queen Elizabeth I’s correspondence’. In J. Tyrkkö, M. Kilpiö, T. Nevalainen & M. Rissanen (eds.) Outposts of Historical Corpus Linguistics: From the Helsinki Corpus to a Proliferation of Resources (Studies in Variation, Contacts and Change in English, 10). Helsinki: VARIENG. https://varieng.helsinki.fi/series/volumes/10/evans [accessed 28 Aug. 2020].Google Scholar
Evans, M. 2013. The Language of Queen Elizabeth I: A Sociolinguistic Perspective on Royal Style and Identity. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Evans, M. 2015. ‘The vsuall speach of the court? Investigating language change in the Tudor family network (1544–1556)’, Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics, 1 (2), pp. 153–88.Google Scholar
Evans, M. & Tagg, C.. 2020. ‘Women’s spelling in early modern English: Perspectives from new media’. In Condorelli, M. (ed.), Advances in Historical Orthography, c. 1500–1800. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 191–218.Google Scholar
Ezell, M. M. J. 2014. ‘Handwriting and the book’. In Howsam, L. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to the History of the Book. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 90‒106.Google Scholar
Fisher, J. H. 1977. ‘Chancery and the emergence of standard written English in the fifteenth century’, Speculum, 52 (4), pp. 870–99.Google Scholar
Fisher, J. H. 1996. The Emergence of Standard English. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.Google Scholar
Fishman, J. A. 2008. ‘Rethinking the Ausbau-Abstand dichotomy into a continuous and multivariate system’, International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 191, pp. 17–26.Google Scholar
Fisiak, J. 1994. ‘Linguistic reality of Middle English’. In Fernandez, F., Fuster, M. & Jose Calvo, J. (eds.), English Historical Linguistics, 1992: Papers from the 7th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics, Valencia, 22–26 September 1992. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 47–61.Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, S., Robinson, J. A., Alexander, M., Hine, I. C., Mehl, S. & Dallachy, F.. 2017. ‘Linguistic DNA: Investigating conceptual change in early modern English discourse’, Studia Neophilologica, 89 (1), pp. 1–18.Google Scholar
Foster, J. R. 1953. The Triumph of the English Language: A Survey of Opinions Concerning the Vernacular from the Introduction of Printing to the Restoration. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Freeborn, D. 1992. From Old English to Standard English: A Course Book in Language Variation across Time. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Gadd, I. A. 1999. ‘“Being like a field”: Corporate identity in the stationers’ company 1557–1684’. Unpublished D. Phil. thesis, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
Gadd, I. A. 2009. ‘The use and misuse of early English books online’, Literature Compass, 3 (3), pp. 680–92.Google Scholar
Gants, D. L. 2002. ‘A quantitative analysis of the London book trade 1614–1618’, Studies in Bibliography, 55, pp. 185–213.Google Scholar
Gaskell, P. 1972. A New Introduction to Bibliography, revised ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gόmez-Soliño, J. S. 1981. ‘Thomas Wolsey, Thomas More y la lengua inglesa estándar de su época’, Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses, 3, pp. 74–84.Google Scholar
Gόmez-Soliño, J. S. 1984. ‘Variaciόn y estandarizaciόn de la lengua Inglesa en el Ingles Modern Temprano 1470–1540’. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Oviedo.Google Scholar
Gόmez-Soliño, J. S. 1986. ‘La normalizaciόn lingüistica en la época de Enrique VIII’. In Onega, S. (ed.), Estudios literarios ingleses: Renacimiento y Barroco. Madrid: Cátedra, pp. 19–44.Google Scholar
Görlach, M. 1990. ‘The development of standard Englishes’. In Görlach, M. (ed.), Studies in the History of the English Language. Heidelberg: Winter, pp. 9‒64. German version: Görlach, M. 1988. ‘Sprachliche Standardisierungsprozesse im englischprachigen Bereich’. In U. Ammon, K. J. Mattheier & P. H. Nelde (eds.), Sociolinguistica. Internationales Jahrbuch für Europӓische Soziolinguistik, 2. Tübingen: Niemeyer, pp. 131‒85.Google Scholar
Görlach, M. 1991. Introduction to Early Modern English, revised ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Görlach, M. 1999. ‘Regional and social variation’. In Lass, R. (ed.), The Cambridge History of the English Language, vol. 3: 1476‒1776. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 459‒538.Google Scholar
Görlach, M. 2001. Eighteenth-Century English. Heidelberg: Karl Winter Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
Graband, G. 1965. Die Entwicklung der Frühneuenglischen Nominalflexion. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Greenfield, L. 1992. Nationalism: Five Roads to Modernity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Grund, P. J. 2011. ‘Scribes and scribal practices’. In Kytö, M., Grund, P. J. & Walker, T., Testifying to Language and Life in Early Modern England. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 147–80.Google Scholar
Halasz, A. 1997. The Marketplace of Print: Pamphlets and the Public Sphere in Early Modern England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Harding, V. 1990. ‘The population of London, 1500–1700: A review of the published evidence’, London Journal, 15, pp. 122–3.Google Scholar
Harris, M. 2003. ‘Print in neighbourhood commerce: The case of Carter Lane’. In Myers, R., Harris, M. & Mandelbrote, G. (eds.), The London Book Trade: Topographies of Print in the Metropolis from the Sixteenth Century. New Castle: Oak Knoll Press, pp. 45–69.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, M. 2008. ‘Creating economical morphosyntactic patterns in language change’. In Good, J. (ed.), Language Universals and Language Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 185–214.Google Scholar
Haugen, E. 1966. ‘Dialect, language, nation’, American Anthropologist, 68, pp. 922–35.Google Scholar
Haugen, E. 1987. ‘Language planning’. In Ammon, U., Dittmar, N., Mattheier, K. J. & Trudgill, P. (eds.), Sociolinguistics, vol. 1. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 626–37.Google Scholar
Hawkins, J. A. 2014. Cross-Linguistic Variation and Efficiency. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heikkonen, K. 1996. ‘Regional variation in standardization: A case study of Henry V’s Signet Office’. In Nevalainen, T. & Raumolin-Brunberg, H. (eds.), Sociolinguistics and Language History: Studies Based on the Corpus of Early English Correspondence. Amsterdam: Rodopi, pp. 111–27.Google Scholar
Hellinga, L. 1983. ‘Manuscripts in the hands of printers’. In Trapp, J. B. (ed.), Manuscripts in the Fifty Years after the Invention of Printing. London: University of London, pp. 3–12.Google Scholar
Hellinga, L. 1991. ‘Importation of books printed on the continent into England and Scotland before c. 1520’. In Hindman, S. (ed.), Printing the Written Word: The Social History of Books, circa 1450‒1520. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, pp. 205‒24.Google Scholar
Hellinga, L. 1999. ‘Printing’. In Hellinga, L. & Trapp, J. B. (eds.), The Cambridge History of the Book in Britain, vol. 3: 1400–1557. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 65–108.Google Scholar
Hellinga, L. & Trapp, J. B.. 1999. ‘Introduction’. In Hellinga, L. & Trapp, J. B. (eds.), The Cambridge History of the Book in Britain, vol. 3: 1400–1557. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–30.Google Scholar
Henderson, L. 1984. ‘Writing systems and reading processes’. In Henderson, L. (ed.), Orthographies and Reading: Perspectives from Cognitive Psychology, Neuropsychology, and Linguistics. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 11–24.Google Scholar
Hernández-Campoy, J. M. 2015. Sociolinguistic Styles (Language in Society). Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hernández-Campoy, J. M. 2016. ‘Authorship and gender in English historical sociolinguistic research: Samples from the Paston letters’. In Russi, C. (ed.), Current Trends in Historical Sociolinguistics. Berlin: De Gruyter Open, pp. 108–42.Google Scholar
Hernández-Campoy, J. M. & Conde-Silvestre, J. C.. 1999. ‘The social diffusion of linguistic innovations in 15th century England: Chancery spellings in private correspondence’, Cuadernos de Filología Inglesa, 8, pp. 251–74.Google Scholar
Hernández-Campoy, J. M. & Conde-Silvestre, J. C.. 2005. ‘Sociolinguistic and geolinguistic approaches to the historical diffusion of linguistic innovations: Incipient standardisation in late middle English’, International Journal of English Studies, 5 (1), pp. 101–34.Google Scholar
Hickey, R. (ed.) 2010. Eighteenth-Century English: Ideology and Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hinman, C. 1963. The Printing and Proof-Reading of the First Folio of Shakespeare, vol. 1. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hoeppner Moran, J.-A. 1985. The Growth of English Schooling 1340–1548. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hope, J. 2000. ‘Rats, bats, sparrows, and dogs: Biology, linguistics, and the nature of standard English’. In Wright, L. (ed.), The Development of Standard English, 1300–1800: Theories, Descriptions, Conflicts (Studies in English Language). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 49–56.Google Scholar
Horobin, S. 2001. ‘The language of the fifteenth-century printed editions of The Canterbury Tales’, Anglia, 119 (2), pp. 249–58.Google Scholar
Houston, K. 2013. Shady Characters: Ampersands, Interrobangs and Other Typographical Curiosities. London: Penguin Group.Google Scholar
Howard-Hill, T. 2006. ‘Early modern printers and the standardization of English spelling’, Modern Language Review, 101, pp. 16–29.Google Scholar
Isaac, F. 1932. English & Scottish Printing Types 1501–35. London: Oxford University of the Bibliographical Society.Google Scholar
Isaac, F. 1936. English Printers’ Types of the Sixteenth Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jaffe, A., Androutsopoulos, J., Sebba, M. & Johnson, S. (eds.). 2012. Orthography as Social Action: Scripts, Spelling, Identity and Power. Berlin: Walter De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Johansson, S. 2008. ‘Some aspects of the development of corpus linguistics in the 1970s and 1980s’. In Lüdeling, A. & Kytö, M. (eds.), Corpus Linguistics: An International Handbook. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 33–53.Google Scholar
Johns, A. 1998. The Nature of the Book: Print and Knowledge in the Making. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, F. R. 1950. ‘Notes on English retail book-prices, 1550‒1640’, Library, 5, pp. 83‒112.Google Scholar
Johnston, M. D. 1988. ‘Mateo Alemán’s problem with spelling’, Publications of the Modern Language Association of America, 103 (5), pp. 759–69.Google Scholar
Jones, R. F. 1953. The Triumph of the English Language: A Survey of Opinions Concerning the Vernacular from the Introduction of Printing to the Restoration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kaislaniemi, S. 2017. ‘Code-switching, script-switching, and typeface switching in early modern English manuscript letters and printed tracts’. In Peikola, M., Mäkilähde, A., Varila, M.-L., Salmi, H. & Skaffari, J. (eds.), Verbal and Visual Communication in Early English Texts. Turnhout: Brepols, pp. 165–200.Google Scholar
Kaislaniemi, S., Evans, M., Juvonen, T. & Sairio, A.. 2017. ‘“A graphic system which leads its own linguistic life?” Epistolary spelling in English, 1400–1800’. In Säily, T., Nurmi, A., Palander-Collin, M. & Auer, A. (eds.), Exploring Future Paths for Historical Sociolinguistics (Advances in Historical Sociolinguistics, 7). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 187–213.Google Scholar
Kichuk, D. 2007. ‘Metamorphosis: Remediation in Early English Books Online (EEBO)’, Literary and Linguistic Computing, 22 (3), pp. 291–303.Google Scholar
Kights, M. 2005. Representation and Misrepresentation in Later Stuart Britain: Partisanship and Political Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
King, J. H. 1999. ‘The book-trade under Edward VI and Mary I’. In Hellinga, L. & Trapp, J. B. (eds.), The Cambridge History of the Book in Britain, vol. 3: 1400–1557. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 164–75.Google Scholar
Kloss, H. 1967. ‘Abstand-languages and Ausbau-languages’, Anthropological Linguistics, 9, pp. 29–41.Google Scholar
Kloss, H. 1978. Die Entwicklung neuer Germanischer Kultursprachen seit 1800, 2nd revised ed. Düsseldorf: Schwann.Google Scholar
Kniezsa, V. 1997. ‘The origins of Scots orthography’. In Jones, C. (ed.), The Edinburgh History of the Scots Language. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 24–46.Google Scholar
Knight, J. T. 2013. Bound to Read: Compilations, Collections, and the Making of Renaissance Literature. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Kohnen, T. 2014. Introduction to the History of English (Textbooks in English Language and Linguistics, 6). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Kopaczyk, J. 2013. The Legal Language of Scottish Burghs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Koselleck, R. 1979. Vergangene Zukunft. Zur Semantik geschichtlicher Zeiten. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Kroch, A. 1994. ‘Morphosyntactic variation’. In Beals, K., Denton, J., Knippen, R., Melnar, L., Suzuki, H. & Zeinfeld, E. (eds.), Papers from the 30th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, vol. 2: The Parasession on Variation in Linguistic Theory. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society, pp. 180–201.Google Scholar
Kytö, M. & Walker, T.. 2006. Guide to a Corpus of English Dialogues 1560–1760 (Studia Anglistica Upsaliensia, 130). Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.Google Scholar
Labov, W. 1972. Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Lane Ford, M. 1999a. ‘Importation of printed books into England and Scotland’. In Hellinga, L. & Trapp, J. B. (eds.), The Cambridge History of the Book in Britain, vol. 3: 1400–1557. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 179–201.Google Scholar
Lane Ford, M. 1999b. ‘Private ownership and printed books’. In Hellinga, L. & Trapp, J. B. (eds.), The Cambridge History of the Book in Britain, vol. 3: 1400–1557. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 205–28.Google Scholar
Lange, C. 2012. ‘Standardization: Standards in the history of English’. In Bergs, A. & Brinton, L. J. (eds.), English Historical Linguistics: An International Handbook. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, pp. 994–1006.Google Scholar
Lass, R. 1976. English Phonology and Phonological Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lass, R. 1999a. ‘Introduction’. In Lass, R. (ed.), The Cambridge History of the English Language, vol. 3: 1476–1776. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–12.Google Scholar
Lass, R. 1999b. ‘Phonology and morphology’. In Lass, R. (ed.), The Cambridge History of the English Language, vol. 3: 1476–1776. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 56–186.Google Scholar
Leedham-Green, E. & McKitterick, D.. 2002. ‘Ownership: Private and public libraries’. In Barnard, J. & McKenzie, D. F. (eds.), The Cambridge History of the Book in Britain, vol. 4: 1557–1695. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 323–38.Google Scholar
Lehto, A., Baron, A., Ratia, M. & Rayson, P.. 2010. ‘Improving the precision of corpus methods’. In Taavitsainen, I. & Pahta, P. (eds.), Early Modern English Medical Texts: Corpus Description and Studies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 279–89.Google Scholar
Lesser, Z. 2006. ‘Typographic nostalgia: Play-reading, popularity, and the meanings of black letter’. In Straznicky, M. (ed.), The Book of the Play: Playwrights, Stationers, and Readers in Early Modern England. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, pp. 99–126.Google Scholar
Lillis, T. M. 2013. The Sociolinguistics of Writing. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Little, G. D. 1984. ‘Punctuation’. In Moran, M. G. & Funsford, R. F. (eds.), Research in Composition and Rhetoric: A Bibliographic Sourcebook. Westport: Greenwood Press, pp. 371–98.Google Scholar
Liuzza, R. 1996. ‘Orthography and historical linguistics’, Journal of English Linguistics, 24 (1), pp. 25–44.Google Scholar
Loach, J. 1986. ‘The Marian establishment and the printing press’, English Historical Review, 101, pp. 135–48.Google Scholar
Locher, M. A. & Strässler, J.. 2008. ‘Introduction: Standards and norms’. In Locher, M. A. & Strässler, J. (eds.), Standards and Norms in the English Language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 1–20.Google Scholar
López-Couso, M. J. 2016. ‘Corpora and online resources in English historical linguistics’. In Kytö, M. & Pahta, P. (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of English Historical Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 127–45.Google Scholar
Love, H. 1978. ‘Preacher and publisher: Oliver Heywood and Thomas Parkhurst’, Studies in Bibliography, 31, pp. 227–35.Google Scholar
Lucas, P. J. 1973. ‘Consistency and correctness in the orthographic usage of John Capgrave’s Chronicle’, Studia Neophilologica, 45 (2), pp. 323–55.Google Scholar
Malone, E. A. 2006. ‘Learned correctors as technical editors: Specialization and collaboration in early modern European printing houses’, Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 20 (4), pp. 389–424.Google Scholar
Mann, J. 2009. The Gutenberg Revolution: How Printing Changed the Course of History. London: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
Marckwardt, A. H. 1977. ‘The development of oa spellings in early modern English’, American Speech, 52 (1/2), pp. 105–11.Google Scholar
Marks, A. 2012. ‘England, the English and the Thirty Years’ War (1618–1648)’. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of St Andrews.Google Scholar
Markus, M. 1999. (compiler) Innsbruck Computer-Archive of Machine-Readable English Texts (ICAMET) (Innsbrucker Beitraege zur Kulturwissenschaft, Anglistische Reihe, 7). Innsbruck: Leopold-Franzens-Universitaet Innsbruck.Google Scholar
Markus, M. 2006. ‘Abbreviations in early modern English correspondence’. In Dossena, M. & Fitzmaurice, S. M. (eds.), Business and Official Correspondence: Historical Investigations. Bern: Peter Lang, pp. 107–29.Google Scholar
Mattison, A. 2019. Solitude and Speechlessness: Renaissance Writing and Reading in Isolation. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
McConchie, R. 2011. ‘Compounds and code-switching: Compositorial practice in William Turner’s Libellus de re Herbaria Novvs, 1538’. In Thaisen, J. & Rutkowska, H. (eds.), Scribes, Printers, and the Accidentals of Their Texts. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, pp. 177–90.Google Scholar
McEnery, T. & Hardie, A.. 2012. Corpus Linguistics: Method, Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McKenzie, D. F. 1969. ‘Printers of the mind: Some notes on bibliographical theories and printing-house practices’, Studies in Bibliography, 22, pp. 1–75.Google Scholar
McKenzie, D. F. 2002. ‘Printing and publishing 1557–1700: Constraints on the London book trades’. In Barnard, J. & McKenzie, D. F. (eds.), The Cambridge History of the Book in Britain, vol. 4: 1557–1695. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 553–67.Google Scholar
McKerrow, R. B. 1927. An Introduction to Bibliography for Literary Students. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
McLeod, R. 1979. ‘Spellbound: Typography and the concept of old-spelling editions’, Renaissance and Reformation, 3 (1), pp. 50–65.Google Scholar
McLuhan, M. 1962. The Gutenberg Galaxy: The Making of Typographical Man. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
del R. Medina Sánchez, B. 2015. ‘Punctuation in eighteenth-century English grammars’. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of las Palmas de Gran Canaria.Google Scholar
Millward, C. M. 1989. A Biography of the English Language. New York: Holt Rinehard Winston.Google Scholar
Milroy, J. 1994. ‘The notion of “standard language” and its applicability to the study of early modern English pronunciation’. In Stein, D. & Tieken-Boon van Ostade, I. (eds.), Towards a Standard English 1600‒1800. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 19‒29.Google Scholar
Milroy, J. 2000. ‘Historical description and the ideology of the standard language’. In Wright, L. (ed.), The Development of Standard English, 1300–1800: Theories, Descriptions, Conflicts (Studies in English Language). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 11–28.Google Scholar
Milroy, J. 2001. ‘Language ideologies and the consequences of standardization’. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 5 (4), pp. 530–55.Google Scholar
Milroy, J. & Milroy, L.. 1999. Authority in Language: Investigating Language Prescription and Standardisation, 3rd ed. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Moessner, L. 2012. ‘Early modern English: Standardization’. In Bergs, A. & Brinton, L. J. (eds.), English Historical Linguistics: An International Handbook, vol. 1. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, pp. 698–714.Google Scholar
Moore, J. K. 1992. Primary Materials Relating to Copy and Print in English Books of the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries (OBS Occasional Publications, 24). Oxford: Oxford Bibliographical Society.Google Scholar
Morrill, J. 1997. ‘The religious context of the English Civil War’. In Cust, R. & Hughes, A. (eds.), The English Civil War. London: Arnold, pp. 159–81.Google Scholar
Mosley, J. 2009. ‘The technologies of printing’. In Suarez, M. F., S. J. & Turner, M. L. (eds.), The Cambridge History of the Book in Britain, vol. 5: 1695–1830. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 163–99.Google Scholar
Mueller, M. 2009. Nupos: A Part of Speech Tag Set for Written English from Chaucer to the Present. WordHoard. http://wordhoard.northwestern.edu/userman/nupos.pdf [accessed 5 Jul. 2017].Google Scholar
Nelson, C. & Seccombe, M.. 2002. ‘The creation of the periodical press, 1620–1695’. In Bernard, J. & McKenzie, D. F. (eds.), The Cambridge History of the Book in Britain, vol. 4: 1557–1695. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 533–50.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, T. 1999. ‘Lexis and semantics’. In Lass, R. (ed.), The Cambridge History of the English Language, vol. 3: 1476–1776. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 332–458.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, T. 2006. An Introduction to Early Modern English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, T. 2012. ‘Variable focusing in English spelling between 1400 and 1600’. In Baddeley, S. & Voeste, A. (eds.), Orthographies in Early Modern Europe.Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, pp. 127–65.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, T. 2014. ‘Norms and usage in language history, 1600–1900: A sociolinguistic and comparative perspective’. In Rutten, G., Vosters, R. & Vandenbussche, W. (eds.), Norms and Usage in Language History, 1600–1900: A Sociolinguistic and Comparative Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 103–28.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, T. 2015. ‘What are historical sociolinguistics?’, Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics, 1 (2), pp. 243–69.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, T. & Raumolin-Brunberg, H.. 1989. ‘A corpus of early modern standard English in a socio-historical perspective’, Neuphilologische Mitteilungen, 90 (1), pp. 67–110.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, T. & Raumolin-Brunberg, H.. 2003. Historical Sociolinguistics: Language Change in Tudor and Stuart England (Longman Linguistics Library). London: Longman.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, T. & Raumolin-Brunberg, H.. 2005. ‘Sociolinguistics and the history of English: A survey’, International Journal of English Studies, 5 (1), pp. 33–58.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, T. & Raumolin-Brunberg, H.. 2012. ‘Historical sociolinguistics: Origins, motivations, and paradigm’. In Hernández-Campoy, J. M. & Conde Silvestre, J. C. (eds.), The Handbook of Historical Sociolinguistics. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell, pp. 22–40.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, T. & Tieken-Boon van Ostade, I.. 2006. ‘Standardisation’. In Hogg, R. & Denison, D. (eds.), A History of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 271–311.Google Scholar
Newmeyer, F. J. 2005. Possible and Probable Languages: A Generative Perspective on Linguistic Typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nielsen, H. F. 2005. From Dialect to Standard English in England, 1154–1776 (NOWELE Supplement Series). Odense: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Nurmi, A. 2012. ‘Periods: Early modern English’. In Bergs, A. & Brinton, L. J. (eds.), English Historical Linguistics: An International Handbook, vol. 1. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, pp. 48–63.Google Scholar
Oldireva-Gustafsson, L. 2002. Preterite and Past Participle Forms in English: 1680–1790 (Studia Anglistica Upsaliensia, 120). Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.Google Scholar
Orme, N. 1999. ‘The lay reader: Schools and school-books’. In Hellinga, L. & Trapp, J. B. (eds.), The Cambridge History of the Book in Britain, vol. 3: 1400–1557. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 449–69.Google Scholar
Osselton, N. E. 1963. ‘Formal and informal spelling in the 18th century. Errour, honor and related words’, English Studies, 44, pp. 267–75.Google Scholar
Osselton, N. E. 1984. ‘Informal spelling systems in early modern English, 1500–1800’. In Blake, N. F. & Jones, C. (eds.), English Historical Linguistics: Studies in Development. Sheffield: CECTAL, University of Sheffield, pp. 123–37. Reprinted in M. Rydén, I. Tieken-Boon van Ostade & M. Kytö (eds.). 1998. A Reader in Early Modern English. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, pp. 33–45.Google Scholar
Osselton, N. E. 1985. ‘Spelling book rules and the capitalisation of nouns in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries’. In Arn, M.-J. & Wirtjes, H. (eds.), Historical and Editorial Studies in Medieval and Early Modern English. Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff, pp. 49–62.Google Scholar
Pahta, P. 2011. ‘Code-switching in early modern English medical writing’. In Taavitsainen, I. & Pahta, P. (eds.), Medical Writing in Early Modern English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 115–34.Google Scholar
Partridge, A. C. 1964. Orthography in Shakespeare and Elizabethan Drama. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Patterson, A. 1984. Censorship and Interpretation: The Conditions of Writing and Reading in Early Modern England. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Peacey, J. 2011. ‘Pamphlets’. In Raymond, J. (ed.), The Oxford History of Popular Print Culture, vol. 1: Cheap Print in Britain and in Ireland to 1660. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 453–70.Google Scholar
Pennell, S. 1999. ‘Consumption and consumerism in Early Modern England’, Historical Journal, 42 (2), pp. 549–64.Google Scholar
Percy, C. 2012. ‘Standardization: Codifiers’. In Bergs, A. & Brinton, L. J. (eds.), English Historical Linguistics: An International Handbook. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, pp. 1006–20.Google Scholar
Perfetti, C. 2007. ‘Reading ability: Lexical quality to comprehension’, Scientific Studies of Reading, 11 (4), pp. 357–83.Google Scholar
Perfetti, C. A. & Hart, L.. 2002. ‘The lexical quality hypothesis’, Studies in Written Language and Literacy, 11, pp. 189–213.Google Scholar
Pettegree, A. 1986. Foreign Protestant Communities in Sixteenth-Century London. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Poussa, P. 1982. ‘The evolution of early standard English’, Studia Anglica Posnaniensia, 14, pp. 69–85.Google Scholar
Pyles, T. & Algeo, J.. 1982. The Origins and Development of the English Language, 3rd ed. New York: Harcourt Brace Janovich.Google Scholar
Queiroz de Barros, R. 2007. ‘Spelling standardisation in Shakespeare’s first editions: Evidence from the second Quarto and first Folio versions of Romeo and Juliet’, Sederi: Yearbook of the Spanish and Portuguese Society for English Renaissance Studies, 17, pp. 93–108.Google Scholar
Rappaport, S. 1989. Worlds within Worlds: Structures of Life in Sixteenth-Century London. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Raumolin-Brunberg, H. 2011. ‘Leaders of linguistic change in Early Modern England’. In Facchinetti, R. & Rissanen, M. (eds.), Corpus-Based Studies of Diachronic English. Oxford: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Raven, J. 2002. ‘The economic context’. In Bernard, J. & McKenzie, D. F. (eds.), The Cambridge History of the Book in Britain, vol. 4: 1557–1695. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 568‒82.Google Scholar
Raven, J. 2007. The Business of Books: Booksellers and the English Book Trade, 1450–1850. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Raymond, J. 2003a. Pamphlets and Pamphleteering in Early Modern Britain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Raymond, J. 2003b. ‘“The language of the public”: Print, politics and the book trade in 1614’. In Clucas, S. & Davies, R. (eds.), The Crisis of 1614 and the Added Parliament: Literary and Historical Perspectives. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing, pp. 95–112.Google Scholar
Raymond, J. 2011a. ‘Development of the book trade’. In Raymond, J. (ed.), The Oxford History of Popular Print Culture, vol. 1: Cheap Print in Britain and in Ireland to 1660. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 59–75.Google Scholar
Raymond, J. 2011b. ‘Introduction: The origins of popular print culture’. In Raymond, J. (ed.), The Oxford History of Popular Print Culture, vol. 1: Cheap Print in Britain and in Ireland to 1660. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
Reith, R. 1999. Lohn und Leistung. Lohnformen im Gewerbe 1450–1900. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
de Ricci, S. 1909. A Census of Caxtons. Oxford: Printed for the Bibliographical Society at the Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Richardson, M. 1980. ‘Henry V, the English Chancery, and Chancery English’, Speculum, 55 (4), pp. 726–50.Google Scholar
Rissanen, M. 2000. ‘Standardization and the language of early statutes’. In Wright, L. (ed.), The Development of Standard English, 1300–1800: Theories, Descriptions, Conflicts (Studies in English Language). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 117–30.Google Scholar
Rissanen, M. 2008. ‘The world of English historical corpora: From Cædmon to computer age’, Journal of English Linguistics, 28, pp. 7–20.Google Scholar
Roberts, J. 2002. ‘The Latin trade’. In Bernard, J. & McKenzie, D. F. (eds.), The Cambridge History of the Book in Britain, vol. 4: 1557–1695. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 141–73.Google Scholar
Rocha, L. M. 1998. ‘Selected self-organization and the semiotics of evolutionary systems’. In Van de Vijver, G., Salthe, S. N. & Delpos, M. (eds.), Evolutionary Systems: Biological and Epistemological Perspectives on Selection and Self-Organization. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 341–58.Google Scholar
Rodríguez-Álvarez, A. 2010. ‘Teaching punctuation in Early Modern England’, Studia Anglica Posnaniensia, 46 (1), pp. 35–49.Google Scholar
Romaine, S. 1998. ‘Introduction’. In Romaine, S. (ed.), The Cambridge History of the English Language, vol. 4: 1776–1997. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–56.Google Scholar
Rostenberg, L. 1971. The Minority Press and the English Crown: A Study in Repression, 1558–1625. Nieuwkoop: B. De Graaf.Google Scholar
Rutkowska, H. 2005. ‘Selected orthographic features in English editions of the Book of Good Manners (1487–1507)’, SELIM: Journal of the Spanish Society for Medieval English Language and Literature, 12, pp. 127–42.Google Scholar
Rutkowska, H. 2012. ‘Linguistic levels: Orthography’. In Bergs, A. & Brinton, L. J. (eds.), English Historical Linguistics: An International Handbook, vol. 1. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, pp. 224–37.Google Scholar
Rutkowska, H. 2013a. ‘Changes affecting the distribution of selected graphemes and clusters of graphemes’. In Rutkowska, H., Orthographic Systems in Thirteen Editions of the ‘Kalender of Shepherdes’ (1506–1656). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, pp. 117–40.Google Scholar
Rutkowska, H. 2013b. Orthographic Systems in Thirteen Editions of the ‘Kalender of Shepherdes’ (1506–1656) (Polish Studies in English Language and Literature). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Rutkowska, H. 2013c. ‘Typographical and graphomorphemic features of five editions of the Kalender of Shepherdes as elements of the early printers’ community of practice’. In Kopaczyk, J. & Jucker, A. H. (eds.), Communities of Practice in the History of English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 123–49.Google Scholar
Rutkowska, H. 2015. ‘Late medieval dialectal and obsolescent spellings in the sixteenth-century editions of the Kalender of Shepherdes’. In Conde-Silvestre, J. C. & Calle-Martín, J. (eds.), Approaches to Middle English: Variation, Contact and Change. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, pp. 129–47.Google Scholar
Rutkowska, H. 2016. ‘Orthographic regularization in early modern English printed books: Grapheme distribution and vowel length indication’. In Russi, C. (ed.), Current Trends in Historical Sociolinguistics. Warsaw: De Gruyter, pp. 165–93.Google Scholar
Rutkowska, H. & Rössler, P.. 2012. ‘Orthographic variables’. In Hernández-Campoy, J. M. & Conde Silvestre, J. C. (eds.), The Handbook of Historical Sociolinguistics. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell, pp. 214–36.Google Scholar
Saenger, P. 1997. Space between Words: The Origins of Silent Reading. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Sairio, A. 2008a. ‘Methodological and practical aspects of historical network analysis: A case study of the bluestocking letters’. In Nurmi, A., Nevala, M. & Palander-Collin, M. (eds.), The Language of Daily Life in England (1400–1800). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 107–35.Google Scholar
Sairio, A. 2008b. ‘A social network study of the eighteenth-century bluestockings: The progressive and preposition stranding in their letters’, Historical Sociolinguistics and Sociohistorical Linguistics, 8, pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
Sairio, A. 2009a. ‘Bluestocking letters and the influence of eighteenth-century grammars’. In Dossena, M. & Tieken-Boon van Ostade, I. (eds.), Studies in Late Modern English Correspondence: Methodology and Data. Bern: Peter Lang, pp. 137–62.Google Scholar
Sairio, A. 2009b. Language and Letters of the Bluestocking Network: Sociolinguistic Issues in Eighteenth-Century Epistolary English (Mémoires de la Société néophilologique de Helsinki, 75). Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar
Sairio, A. 2013. ‘Elizabeth Montagu’s Shakespeare essay (1769): The final draft and the first edition as evidence of two communities of practice’. In Kopaczyk, J. & Jucker, A. H. (eds.), Communities of Practice in the History of English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 177–97.Google Scholar
Salles Bernal, S. 2016. ‘Punctuation patterns in a 17th-century medical manuscript: A corpus-based study of G.U.L. MS 303, Treatise on the Diseases of Women’, Nordic Journal of English Studies, 15 (4), pp. 78–106.Google Scholar
Salmon, V. 1986. ‘The spelling and punctuation of Shakespeare’s time’. In Wells, S. & Taylor, G. (eds.), William Shakespeare: The Complete Works, original spelling edition. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. xlii–lvi.Google Scholar
Salmon, V. 1988 [1962]. ‘Early seventeenth-century punctuation as a guide to sentence structure’. In The Study of Language in Seventeenth-Century England. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 47–6.Google Scholar
Salmon, V. 1989. ‘John Rastell and the normalization of early sixteenth-century orthography’. In Breivik, L. E., Hille, A. & Johansson, S. (eds.), Essays on English Language in Honour of Bertil Sundby. Oslo: Novus Forlag, pp. 289–301.Google Scholar
Salmon, V. 1999. ‘Orthography and punctuation’. In Lass, R. (ed.), The Cambridge History of the English Language, vol. 3: 1476–1776. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 13–55.Google Scholar
Sampson, G. 2018. ‘The redundancy of self-organisation as an explanation of English spelling’, Language, 94 (1), pp. 43–7.Google Scholar
Samuels, M. L. 1969 [1963]. ‘Some applications of Middle English dialectology’. In Lass, R. (ed.), Approaches to English Historical Linguistics. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, pp. 404–18. Reprinted from English Studies, 44, pp. 81–94.Google Scholar
Samuels, M. L. 1972. Linguistic Evolution, with Special Reference to English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Samuels, M. L. 1981. ‘Spelling and dialect in the late and post-Middle English periods’. In Benskin, M. & Samuels, M. L. (eds.), So Meny People Longages and Tonges: Philological Essays in Scots and Mediaeval English presented to Angus McIntosh. Edinburgh: Middle English Dialect Project, pp. 43–54.Google Scholar
Schaefer, U. 2006. ‘The beginnings of standardization: The communicative space in fourteenth-century England’. In Schaefer, U. (ed.), The Beginnings of Standardization: Language and Culture in Fourteenth-Century England. Frankfurt: Peter Lang, pp. 3–24.Google Scholar
Schlögl, R. 2013. Alter Glaube und moderne Welt. Frankfurt am Main: S. Fischer Verlag.Google Scholar
Schneider, P. 2002. ‘Computer assisted spelling normalization of 18th century English’. In Peters, P., Collins, P. & Smith, A. (eds.), New Frontiers of Corpus Research: Papers from the 21st International Conference on English Language Research on Computerized Corpora, Sydney, 2000. Amsterdam: Rodopi, pp. 199–211.Google Scholar
Scott, C. T. 1967. ‘On the dating of NE ee and ea spellings […]’. In Rauch, I. & Scott, C. (eds.), Approaches to Linguistic Methodology. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Scragg, D. G. 1974. A History of English Spelling. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Sebba, M. 2007. Spelling and Society: The Culture and Politics of Orthography around the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shaw, D. J. 2007. ‘The book trade comes of age: The sixteenth century’. In Eliot, S. & Rose, J. (eds.), A Companion to the History of the Book. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 220–31.Google Scholar
Shawcross, J. T. 1963. ‘One aspect of Milton’s spelling: Idle final E’, Publications of the Modern Language Association of America, 78, pp. 501–10.Google Scholar
Shevlin, E. F. 1999. ‘“To reconcile book and title, and make ‘em kin to one another”: The evolution of the title’s contractual functions’, Book History, 2 (1), pp. 42–77.Google Scholar
Shuger, D. 2006. Censorship and Cultural Sensibility: The Regulation of Language in Tudor-Stuart England. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Shute, R. 2017a. ‘A quantitative study of spelling variation in William Caxton’s printed texts’. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Sheffield.Google Scholar
Shute, R. 2017b. ‘Pressed for space: The effects of justification and the printing process on fifteenth-century orthography’, English Studies, 98 (3), pp. 262–82.Google Scholar
Siebert, F. S. 1965. Freedom of the Press in England, 1476–1776: The Rise and Decline of Government Control. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Simmons, R. C. 2002. ‘ABCs, almanacs, ballads, chapbooks, popular piety and textbooks’. In Bernard, J. & McKenzie, D. F. (eds.), The Cambridge History of the Book in Britain, vol. 4: 1557–1695. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 404–513.Google Scholar
Simpson, P. 1935. Proof-Reading in the Sixteenth, Seventeenth, and Eighteenth Centuries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, J. 1996. An Historical Study of English: Function, Form and Change. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Smith, J. 2005. Essentials of Early English: An Introduction to Old, Middle and Early Modern English. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Smith, J. 2012. ‘From Middle English to early modern English’. In Mugglestone, L. (ed.), The Oxford History of English, updated ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 147–79.Google Scholar
Smith, M. M. 1994. ‘The design relationship between the manuscript and the incunable’. In Myers, R. & Harris, M. (eds.), A Millennium of the Book: Production, Design and Illustration in Manuscript and Print 900–1900. Winchester: St Paul’s Bibliographies, pp. 23‒43.Google Scholar
Smith, N. 1994. Literature and Revolution in England, 1640–1660. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Smoluk, M. 2012. ‘The dissolution of the monasteries and its impact on education in Tudor times’, International Studies: Interdisciplinary Political and Cultural Journal, 14, pp. 109–20.Google Scholar
Sönmez, M. J.-M. 1993. ‘English spelling in the seventeenth century: A Study of the nature of standardisation as seen through the MS and printed versions of the Duke of Newcastle’s “A New Method …”’. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Durham.Google Scholar
Sönmez, M. J.-M. 2000. ‘Perceived and real differences between men’s and women’s spelling in the early to mid-seventeenth century’. In Kastovky, D. & Mettinger, A. (eds.), The History of English as a Social Context: A Contribution to Historical Sociolinguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 405–39.Google Scholar
Spolsky, B. 2012. ‘What is language policy?’ In Spolsky, B. (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Language Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–15.Google Scholar
Stein, D. 1994. ‘Sorting out the variants: Standardization and social factors in the English language 1600‒1800’. In Stein, D. & Tieken-Boon van Ostade, I. (eds.), Towards a Standard English 1600‒1800. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 1‒14.Google Scholar
Stenbrenden, G. F. 2016. Long-Vowel Shifts in English, c. 1050–1700: Evidence from Spelling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, I. 2000. ‘Scientific language and spelling standardisation’. In Wright, L. (ed.), The Development of Standard English 1300–1800: Theories, Descriptions, Conflicts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 131–54.Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, I. 2001. ‘Changing conventions of writing: The dynamics of genres, text types, and text traditions’, European Journal of English Studies, 5 (2), pp. 139–50.Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, I. 2004a. ‘Genre of secular instruction: A linguistic history of useful entertainment’, Miscelànea: A Journal of English and American Studies, 29, pp. 75–94.Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, I. 2004b. ‘Scriptorial “house-styles” and discourse communities’. In Taavitsainen, I. & Pahta, P. (eds.), Medical and Scientific Writing in Late Medieval English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 209–40.Google Scholar
Thomson, D. (ed.) 1984. An Edition of the Middle English Grammatical Texts. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Tieken-Boon van Ostade, I. 1996. ‘Social network theory and eighteenth-century English: The case of Boswell’. In Britton, D. (ed.), English Historical Linguistics 1994: Papers from the 8th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 327–37.Google Scholar
Tieken-Boon van Ostade, I. 1998. ‘Standardization of English spelling: The eighteenth-century printers’ contribution’. In Fisiak, J. & Krygier, M. (eds.), Advances in English Historical Linguistics 1996. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 457–70.Google Scholar
Tieken-Boon van Ostade, I. 2003. ‘Lowth’s language’. In Dossena, M. & Jones, C. (eds.), Insights into Late Modern English. Bern: Peter Lang, pp. 241–64.Google Scholar
Tieken-Boon van Ostade, I. 2006a. ‘English at the onset of the normative tradition’. In Mugglestone, L. (ed.), The Oxford History of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 240–73.Google Scholar
Tieken-Boon van Ostade, I. 2006b. ‘“Disrespectful and too familiar?” Abbreviations as an index of politeness in 18th-century letters’. In Dalton-Puffer, C., Kastovsky, D., Ritt, N. & Schendl, H. (eds.), Syntax, Style and Grammatical Norms: English from 1500–2000. Bern: Peter Lang, pp. 229–47.Google Scholar
Tieken-Boon van Ostade, I. 2009. An Introduction to Late Modern English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Took, P. 1977. ‘Government and the printing trade, 1540–1560’. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of London.Google Scholar
Trapp, J. B. 1999. ‘Literacy, books and readers’. In Hellinga, L. & Trapp, J. B. (eds.), The Cambridge History of the Book in Britain, vol. 3: 1400–1557. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 31–43.Google Scholar
Tyrkkö, J. 2013. ‘Printing houses as communities of practice: Orthography in early modern medical books’. In Kopaczyk, J. & Jucker, A. H. (eds.), Communities of Practice in the History of English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 151–76.Google Scholar
Tyrkkö, J. 2017. ‘Quantifying contrasts: A method of computational analysis of visual features on the early printed page’. In Peikola, M., Mäkilähde, A., Varila, M.-L., Salmi, H. & Skaffari, J. (eds.), Verbal and Visual Communication in Early English Texts. Turnhout: Brepols, pp. 95–112.Google Scholar
Tykkö, J., Hickey, R. & Marttila, V.. 2010. ‘Exploring early modern English medical texts’. In Taavitsainen, I. & Pahta, P. (eds.), Early Modern English Medical Texts: Corpus Description and Studies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 219–78.Google Scholar
Upward, C. & Davidson, G.. 2011. The History of English Spelling. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
van Vliet, R. 2007. ‘Print and public in Europe: 1600–1800’. In Eliot, S. & Rose, J. (eds.), A Companion to the History of the Book. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 247–58.Google Scholar
Voeste, A. 2012. ‘The emergence of suprasegmental spellings in German’. In Baddeley, S. & Voeste, A. (eds.), Orthographies in Early Modern Europe. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, pp. 168‒91.Google Scholar
Voet, L. 1966. ‘The making of books in the renaissance as told by the archives of the Plantin-Moretus museum’, Paga (Printing & Graphic Arts), 10, pp. 33–66.Google Scholar
Wall, W. 2000. ‘Authorship and the material conditions of writing’. In Kinney, A. F. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to English Literature, 1500–1600. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 64–89.Google Scholar
Watt, T. 1991. Cheap Print and Popular Piety, 1550–1640. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Weiner, E. 2012. ‘Early modern English pronunciation and spelling’. Oxford English Dictionary. http://public.oed.com/aspects-of-english/english-in-time/early-modern-english-pronunciation-and-spelling [accessed 16 Sept. 2017].Google Scholar
Weinstock, H. 1978. ‘Typographical aspects of early modern English orthoepy’, Zeitschrift fur Anglistik und Amerikanistik, 26 (4), pp. 340–50.Google Scholar
Wełna, J. 2011. ‘On early pseudo-learned orthographic forms: A contribution to the history of English spelling and pronunciation’, Studia Anglica Posnaniensia, 46 (4), pp. 25–39.Google Scholar
Whalley, J. I. 1969. English Handwriting, 1540–1853: An Illustrated Survey Based on Material in the National Art Library, Victoria and Albert Museum. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Wilson, R. M. 1963. ‘The orthography and provenance of Henry Machyn’. In Browne, A. & Foote, P. (eds.), Early English and Norse Studies: Presented to Hugh Smith in Honour of His Sixtieth Birthday. London: Methuen, pp. 202–16.Google Scholar
Wójcik, J. 2016. ‘The orthographical representation of {-NESS}, {-SHIP}, {-DOM} and {-HOOD} in the first printed editions of English Psalms’, Roczniki Humanistyczne, 64 (5), pp. 63–78.Google Scholar
Wolfe, H. 2009. ‘Women’s handwriting in Early Modern England’. In Knoppers, L. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Early Modern Women’s Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 21–39.Google Scholar
Wright, L. 1994. ‘On the writing of the history of Standard English’. In Fernandez, F., Fuster, M. & Calvo, J. J. (eds.), English Historical Linguistics 1992 (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 113). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 105–15.Google Scholar
Wright, L. (ed.) 2020. The Multilingual Origins of Standard English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Wrigley, E. A., Davies, R. S., Oppen, J. E. & Schofield, R. S.. 1997. English Population History from Family Reconstitution, 1580–1837. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Yáñez-Bouza, N. 2016. ‘Early and late modern English grammars as evidence in English historical linguistics’. In Kytö, M. & Pahta, P. (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of English Historical Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 164–80.Google Scholar