Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T17:00:56.933Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Why (Not) Pragmatism?

from Part III - Luc Boltanski and Pragmatism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2014

Tanja Bogusz
Affiliation:
New York University
Get access

Summary

Theories thus become instruments, not answers to enigmas, in which we can rest. We don't lie back upon them, we move forward, and, on occasion, make nature again over by their aid. Pragmatism unstiffens all our theories, limbers them up and sets each one at work.

William James, ‘What Pragmatism Means’ (1922 [1907])

Is Luc Boltanski a pragmatist thinker? In some current French debates, this question is not a rhetorical one. More than ten years after Pierre Bourdieu's death, and about thirty years after the founding of the Groupe de Sociologie Politique et Morale (GSPM) with Laurent Thévenot and Michael Pollak at the École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales in Paris, the critical stance towards Bourdieusian sociology seems to be increasingly linked to the question of whether or not one may be described as a pragmatist.

At the end of the 1980s, being ‘pragmatic’ permitted a couple of former students and collaborators of Bourdieu to create a fruitful and widely discussed ‘sociology of critique’, in contrast with Bourdieu's ‘critical sociology’. It is no secret that this so-called ‘pragmatic sociology of critique’ – or, if one prefers, simply ‘pragmatic sociology’ – was not explicitly referring to the classical American pragmatism founded by Charles Sanders Peirce, William James, George Herbert Mead, and John Dewey. This has been largely admitted by members of the GSPM (Dodier, 2005; Thévenot, 2011). Interestingly, no one seems to care less about it than the most emblematic figure of the group, Boltanski himself. Though internationally recognized as one of the founders of French neo-pragmatism, Boltanski's references to this philosophy of knowledge and action are scattered and appear anything but systematic. Known for his scepticism towards theoreticist intellectualism, this is, after all, not surprising. Does this mean, however, that his sociology is, after all, not pragmatist (Stavo-Debauge, 2012)? Moreover, what – if anything – can we learn from this question?

Type
Chapter
Information
The Spirit of Luc Boltanski
Essays on the 'Pragmatic Sociology of Critique'
, pp. 129 - 152
Publisher: Anthem Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×