Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-669899f699-qzcqf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-01T16:30:42.312Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Kleptoparasitic spiders of the subfamily Argyrodinae: a special case of behavioural plasticity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

By
Mary Whitehouse
Edited by
Marie Elisabeth Herberstein
Mary Whitehouse
Affiliation:
Australian Cotton Research Unit, Australia
Marie Elisabeth Herberstein
Affiliation:
Macquarie University, Sydney
Get access

Summary

Throughout this book we have seen numerous examples of the flexible nature of spider behaviour. This includes flexibility in silk and web production and design; foraging, anti-predatory and deceptive behaviour; and sociality and courtship behaviour. We have also seen how behavioural plasticity and learning enhances the flexibility of these different behaviours. In this chapter we will look at a subfamily of spiders, Argyrodinae (Theridiidae), to see how all these forms of flexibility contribute to the success of this group. Argyrodinae are by no means the most successful group of spiders, nor are they likely to be the most intelligent (if it were possible to measure such a thing in spiders, that award would undoubtedly go to individuals in the Portia genus) but they are an interesting group of spiders that illustrate many of the concepts discussed in the book, and they also show some unusual takes on common themes.

Introduction

The subfamily Argyrodinae, which contains over 200 species, is well known for its association with the webs of other spiders, and the range of foraging techniques this group uses to exploit other spiders. For example, there are species that glean insects off the edge of the web (e.g. Hénaut, 2000, Kullmann, 1959), eat the silk from the web (e.g. Cangialosi, 1991, Grostal and Walter, 1997, Kerr and Quenga, 2004, Miyashita et al., 2004), steal food bundles caught and wrapped by the host spider (e.g. Hénaut et al., 2007, Vollrath, 1984, Whitehouse, 1997a), attack the host while it is moulting (Cangialosi, 1990, Tanaka, 1984, Whitehouse, 1986) and actively prey on the host or its young (Eberhard, 1979, Larcher and Wise, 1985, Smith Trail, 1980) by either by throwing a sticky thread (Eberhard, 1979, Whitehouse, 1987a) or by lunging at them (Whitehouse, 1986).

Type
Chapter
Information
Spider Behaviour
Flexibility and Versatility
 , pp. 348 - 386
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Agnarsson, I. (2002). Sharing a web: on the relation of sociality and kleptoparasitism in theridiid spiders (Theridiidae, Araneae). Journal of Arachnology, 30, 181–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agnarsson, I. (2004). Morphological phylogeny of cobweb spiders and their relatives (Araneae, Araneoidea, Theridiidae). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 141, 447–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aisenberg, A. and Eberhard, W. G. (2009). Female cooperation in plug formation in a spider: effects of male copulatory courtship. Behavioral Ecology, 20, 1236–1241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archer, A. F. (1946). The Theridiidae or comb-footed spiders of Alabama. Alabama Museum of Natural History, 22, 1–67.Google Scholar
Arnedo, M. A., Coddington, J., Agnarsson, I. and Gillespie, R. G. (2004). From a comb to a tree: phylogenetic relationships of the comb-footed spiders (Araneae, Theridiidae) inferred from nuclear and mitochondrial genes. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 31, 225–245.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arnott, G. and Elwood, R. W. (2009). Assessment of fighting ability in animal contests. Animal Behaviour, 77, 991–1004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baba, Y. G., Walters, R. J. and Miyashita, T. (2007). Host-dependent differences in prey acquisition between populations of a kleptoparasitic spider Argyrodes kumadai (Araneae: Theridiidae). Ecological Entomology, 32, 38–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrantes, G. and Weng, J. L. (2007). Natural history, courtship, feeding behaviour and parasites of Theridion evexum (Araneae: Theridiidae). Bulletin of the British Arachnological Society, 14, 61–65.Google Scholar
Berger-Tal, O., Mukherjee, S., Kotler, B. P. and Brown, J. S. (2010). Complex state-dependent games between owls and gerbils. Ecology Letters, 13, 302–310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berry, J. W. (1987). Notes on the life history and behavior of the communal spider Cyrtophora moluccensis (Doleschall) (Araneae, Araneidae) in Yap, Caroline Islands. Journal of Arachnology, 15, 309.Google Scholar
Bradoo, B. L. (1983). A new record of commensalism between Argyrodes progiles Tikader (Araneae: Theridiidae) and Stegodyphus sarasinorum Karsch. Current Science, 52, 217–218.Google Scholar
Bouskila, A. and Blumstein, D. T. (1992). Rules of thumb for predation hazard assessment: predictions form a dynamic model. American Naturalist, 139, 162–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bretman, A., Lawniczak, M. K. N., Boone, J. and Chapman, T. (2010). A mating plug protein reduces early female remating in Drosophila melanogaster. Journal of Insect Physiology, 56, 107–113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, J. S. (1988). Patch use as an indicator of habitat preference, predation risk, and competition. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 22, 37–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buskirk, R. E. (1981). Sociality in the Arachnida. In Social Insects (ed. Hermann, H. R.). London: Academic Press, pp. 281–367.Google Scholar
Cangialosi, K. R. (1990). Life cycle and behaviour of the kleptoparasitic spider, Argyrodes ululans (Araneae, Theridiidae). Journal of Arachnology, 18, 347–358.Google Scholar
Cangialosi, K. R. (1991). Attack strategies of a spider kleptoparasite: effects of prey availability and host colony size. Animal Behaviour, 41, 639–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cangialosi, K. R. (1997). Foraging versatility and the influence of host availability in Argyrodes trigonum (Araneae, Theridiidae). Journal of Arachnology, 25, 182–193.Google Scholar
Clyne, D. (1979). The Garden Jungle. Sydney, Australia: Collins.Google Scholar
Dingemanse, N. J., Kazem, A. J. N., Réale, D. and Wright, J. (2010). Behavioural reaction norms: animal personality meets individual plasticity. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 25, 81–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eberhard, W. G. (1979). Argyrodes attenuatus (Theridiidae): a web that is not a share. Psyche, 86, 407–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, G. B. (2006). Cyrtophora citricola (Araneae: Araneidae), a colonial tentweb orbweaver established in Florida. Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services Entomology Circular, 411(Mar/Apr), 1–4.Google Scholar
Elgar, M. A. (1993). Interspecific associations involving spiders: kleptoparasitism, mimicry and mutualism. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum, 33, 411–430.Google Scholar
Elgar, M. A. (1994). Experimental evidence of a mutualistic association between two web-building spiders. Journal of Animal Ecology, 63, 880–886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elgar, M. A., Pope, B. and Williamson, I. (1983). Observations on the spatial distribution and natural history of Cyrtophora hirta (L. Koch) (Araneae: Araneidae) in Queensland, Australia. Bulletin of the British Arachnological Society, 6, 83–87.Google Scholar
Enquist, M. and Leimar, O. (1983). Evolution of fighting behaviour: decision rules and assessment of relative strength. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 102, 387–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, T. A. (1998). Factors influencing the evolution of social behaviour in Australian crab spiders (Araneae: Thomisidae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 63, 205–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Exline, H. and Levi, H. W. (1962). American spiders of the genus Argyrodes (Araneae, Theridiidae). Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, 127, 75–202.Google Scholar
Gillespie, R. G. and Rivera, M. A. J. (2007). Free-living spiders of the genus Ariamnes (Araneae, Theridiidae) in Hawaii. Journal of Arachnology, 35, 11–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grostal, P. and Walter, D. E. (1997). Kleptoparasites or commensals? Effects of Argyrodes antipodianus (Araneae: Theridiidae) on Nephila plumipes (Araneae: Tetragnathidae). Oecologia, 11, 570–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hénaut, Y. (2000). Host selection by a kleptoparasitic spider. Journal of Natural History, 34, 747–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hénaut, Y., Delme, J., Legal, L. and Williams, T. (2005). Host selection by a kleptobiotic spider. Naturwissenschaften, 92, 95–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horton, C. C. (1982). Predators of two orb-web spiders (Araneae, Araneidae). Journal of Arachnology, 11, 47.Google Scholar
Houser, J. D., Jennings, D. T. and Jakob, E. M. (2005). Predation by Argyrodes trigonum on Linyphia triangularis, an invasive sheet-web weaver in coastal Maine. Journal of Arachnology, 33, 193–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iwasa, Y., Higashi, M. and Yamamura, N. (1981). Prey distribution as a factor determining the choice of optimal foraging strategy. American Naturalist, 117, 710–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, R. R. and Hallas, S. E. A. (1986). Comparative biology of Portia africana, P. albimana, P. fimbriata, P. labiata, P. shultzi. New Zealand Journal of Zoology, 13, 423–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, R. R. and Wilcox, R. S. (1990). Aggressive mimicry, prey-specific predatory behavior and predator-recognition in the predator-prey interactions of Portia fimbriata and Euryattus sp., jumping spiders from Queensland. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 26, 111–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerr, A. M. (2005). Behavior of web-invading spiders Argyrodes argentatus (Theridiidae) in Argiope appensa (Araneidae) host webs in Guam. Journal of Arachnology, 33, 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerr, A. M., and Quenga, A. S. (2004). Population variation of web-invading spiders (Theridiidae: Argyrodes spp.) on host webs in Guam, Mariana Islands, Micronesia. Journal of Natural History, 38, 671–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kotler, B. P. and Blaustein, L. (1995). Titrating food and safety in a heterogeneous environment: when are the risky and safe patches of equal value?Oikos, 74, 251–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krafft, B. (1979). Organisation et évolution des sociétés d'araignées. Journal de Psychologie, 1, 23–51.Google Scholar
Kullmann, E. J. (1959). Beobachtungen und Betrachtungen zum Verhalten der Theridiide Conopistha argyrodes Walckenaer (Araneae). Mitteilungen aus dem Museum fuer Naturkunde in Berlin, 35, 275–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kullmann, E. J. (1972). Evolution of social behaviour in spiders. American Zoologist, 12, 419–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larcher, S. F. and Wise, D. H. (1985). Experimental studies of the interactions between a web-invading spider and two host species. Journal of Arachnology, 13, 43–59.Google Scholar
Legendre, R. (1960). Quelques remarques sur le comportement des Argyrodes malgaches. Annalées des Sciences Naturelles Zoologie, 12, 507–512.Google Scholar
Legendre, R. and Lopez, A. (1975). Ultrastructure de la glande clypéale des mâles d'araignées appartenant au genre Argyrodes (Theridiidae). Comptes Rendues de l'Académie des Sciences, Paris, 281, 1101–1103.Google Scholar
Lubin, Y. D. (1974). Adaptive advantages and the evolution of colony formation in Cyrtophora (Araneae: Araneidae). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 34, 321–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miyashita, T. (2001). Competition for a limited space in kleptoparasitic Argyrodes spiders revealed by field experiments. Population Ecology, 43, 97–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miyashita, T. (2002). Population dynamics of two species of kleptoparasitic spiders under different host availabilities. Journal of Arachnology, 30, 31–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miyashita, T., Maezono, Y. and Shimazaki, A. (2004). Silk feeding as an alternative foraging tactic in a kleptoparasitic spider under seasonally changing environments. Journal of Zoology, 262, 225–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Opell, B. D. (1998). Economics of spider orb-webs: the benefits of producing adhesive capture thread and of recycling silk. Functional Ecology, 12, 613–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Packer, C. and Ruttan, L. (1988). The evolution of cooperative hunting. American Naturalist, 132, 159–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Platnick, N. I. (2010). The World Spider Catalog, version 11.0. American Museum of Natural History. Online at http://research.amnh.org/iz/spiders/catalog/
Proctor, H. (1992). Cohabitation of six species of spiders in webs of Cyrtophora moluccensis (Araneae, Araneidae) in Moorea, French Polynesia. Journal of Arachnology, 20, 144–145.Google Scholar
Robinson, M. H. and Olazarri, J. (1971). Units of behavior and complex sequences in the predatory behavior of Argiope argentata (Fabricius) (Araneae: Araneidae). Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology, 65, 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, M. H. and Robinson, B. (1973). Ecology and behavior of the giant wood spider Nephila maculata (Fabricius) in New Guinea. Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology, 149, 1–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rypstra, A. L. (1981). The effect of kleptoparasitism on prey consumption and web relocation in a Peruvian population of the spider Nephila clavipes. Oikos, 37, 179–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shamble, P. S., Wilgers, D. J., Swoboda, K. A. and Hebets, E. A. (2009). Courtship effort is a better predictor of mating success than ornamentation for male wolf spiders. Behavioral Ecology, 20, 1242–1251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherman, P. M. (1994). The orb-web: an energetic and behavioural estimator of a spider's dynamic foraging and reproductive strategies. Animal Behaviour, 48, 19–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sih, A., Bell, A. and Johnson, J. C. (2004). Behavioral syndromes: an ecological and evolutionary overview. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 19, 372–378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simon, E. (1893). Histoire Naturelle des Araignées. Paris: Libraire Encyclopédique de Roret.Google Scholar
Smith Trail, D. (1980). Predation by Argyrodes (Theridiidae) on solitary and communal spiders. Psyche, 87, 349–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephens, D. W. (1993). Learning and Behavioural Ecology: Incomplete Information and Environmental Predictability. New York: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Tanaka, K. (1984). Rate of predation by a kleptoparasitic spider, Argyrodes fissifrons, upon a large host spider Agelena limbata. Journal of Arachnology, 12, 363–367.Google Scholar
Tanaka, K. (1989). Energetic cost of web construction and its effect on web relocation in the web-building spider Agelena limbata. Oecologia, 81, 459–464.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, P. W. and Elwood, R. W. (2003). The mismeasure of animal contests. Animal Behaviour, 65, 1195–1202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Townley, M. A. and Tillinghast, E. K. (1988). Orb web recycling in Araneus cavaticus (Araneae, Araneidae) with an emphasis on the adhesive spiral component, gabamide. Journal of Arachnology, 16, 303–319.Google Scholar
Valone, T. S. and Brown, J. S. (1989). Measuring patch assessment abilities of desert granivores. Ecology, 70, 1800–1810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vinson, A. (1863). Aranéides des îles de la Réunion, Maurice et Madacascar. Paris: Rovel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vollrath, F. (1976). Konkurrenzvermeidung bei tropischen kleptoparasitischen Haubennetzspinnen der Gattung Argyrodes (Arachnida: Araneae: Theridiidae). Entomologica Germanica, 3, 104–108.Google Scholar
Vollrath, F. (1979a). Behaviour of the kleptoparasitic spider Argyrodes elevatus (Araneae, Theridiidae). Animal Behaviour, 27, 515–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vollrath, F. (1979b). Vibrations: their signal and function for a spider kleptoparasite. Science, 205, 1149–1150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vollrath, F. (1984). Kleptobiotic interactions in invertebrates. In Producers and Scavengers: Strategies of Exploitation and Parasitism (ed. Barnard, C. J.). London: Croom Helm, pp. 61–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vollrath, F. (1987). Kleptobiosis in spiders. In Ecophysiology of Spiders (ed. Nentwig, W.). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer Verlag, pp. 61–94.Google Scholar
Whitehouse, M. E. A. (1986). The foraging behaviours of Argyrodes antipodiana (Araneae, Theridiidae), a kleptoparasitic spider from New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Zoology, 13, 151–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitehouse, M. E. A. (1987a). Spider eat spider: the predatory behaviour of Rhomphaea sp. indet. from New Zealand. Journal of Arachnology, 15, 355–362.Google Scholar
Whitehouse, M. E. A. (1987b). The external structural detail of the protrusions on the cephalothorax of male Argyrodes antipodiana. Bulletin of the British Arachnological Society, 7, 142–144.Google Scholar
Whitehouse, M. E. A. (1988). Factors influencing specificity and choice of host in Argyrodes antipodiana (Theridiidae). Journal of Arachnology, 16, 349–355.Google Scholar
Whitehouse, M. E. A. (1991). To mate or fight? Male-male competition and alternative mating strategies in Argyrodes antipodiana (Theridiidae, Araneae). Behavioural Processes, 23, 163–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitehouse, M. E. A. (1992). Behavioural plasticity in the New Zealand spider Argyrodes antipodiana. Ph.D. thesis, University of Canterbury, New Zealand.Google Scholar
Whitehouse, M. E. A. (1997a). The benefits of stealing from a predator: foraging rates, predation risk, and intraspecific aggression in the kleptoparasitic spider Argyrodes antipodiana. Behavioral Ecology, 8, 665–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitehouse, M. E. A. (1997b). Experience influences male-male contests in the spider Argyrodes antipodiana (Theridiidae: Araneae). Animal Behaviour, 53, 913–923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitehouse, M. E. A. and Jackson, R. R. (1993). Group structure and time budgets of Argyrodes antipodiana (Araneae, Theridiidae), a kleptoparasitic spider from New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Zoology, 20, 201–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitehouse, M. E. A. and Jackson, R. R. (1994). Intraspecific interactions of Argyrodes antipodiana (Araneae: Theridiidae), a kleptoparasitic spider from New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Zoology, 21, 253–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitehouse, M. E. A. and Jackson, R. R. (1998). Predatory behaviour and parental care in Argyrodes flavipes, a social spider from Queensland. Journal of Zoology, 244, 95–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitehouse, M. E. A. and Lubin, Y. D. (2005). The functions of societies and the evolution of group living: spider societies as a test case. Biological Reviews, 80, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitehouse, M. E. A., Agnarsson, I., Miyashita, T., et al. (2002). Argyrodes: phylogeny, sociality and interspecific interactions: – a report on the Argyrodes symposium, Badplaas, 2001. Journal of Arachnology, 30, 238–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiehle, H. (1928). Beiträge zur Biologie der Araneen. Zeitschrift für Morphologie und Ökologie der Tiere, 11, 115–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoshida, H. (2001). The genus Rhomphaea (Araneae: Theridiidae) from Japan, with notes on the subfamily Argyrodinae. Acta Arachnologica, 50, 183–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×